DOCSLIB.ORG

Djvu Document

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

INSECTA MUNDI, Vol. 9, No. 1-2, March - June, 1995 1 Neotropical Cerambycidae (Coleoptera) ofthe Canadian Museum ofNature, Ottawa. V. Onciderini (Lamiinae). Ubirajara R. Martins Museu de Zoologia, IIniversidade de Sao Paulo Caixa Postal 7172 01064 970 Sao Paulo, SP, Brasil. and Maria Helena M Galileo Museu de Ciencias Naturais Funda!;3.o Zoobotanica do Rio GI ande do Sui Caixa Postal 1188 9110111-970 Porto Alegre, HS, Brasil Abstract.The tollowing new speeies are described. Lydipta hurneralis, sp. ft. and Cacostola obliquata, sp. n., from Ecuador; Lochmaeocles leuripennis, sp. n., and Carenesycha velezi, sp. n., from Colombia; Oncideres marauara, sp. n., from Brazil (Amazonas) Oncideres minllta Thomson, 1865, is recorded from Ecuador Key words' Coleoptera, Cerambycldae, Lamiinae, Onciderini Introduction Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazonia, Manaus This fifth contribution on the Neotropical (INPp...); Museo Francisco Luis Gallego, FacuItad de Celambycidae ofthe Canadian M UBeum of Nature CienciaB, UniverBidad Nacional de Colombia, (CMNC) deals with the tribe Onciderini, a predomi­ Medellin; (UNCM); and Museu de Zoologia, nantly Neotropical group with anout 80 genera and I Iniversidade de Sao Paulo (MZSP) 400 species. The tribe was revised by Dillon and Dillon Lydipta humeralis, new species (Fig. 2) (1945, 1946). However, type material of previous authOIs, especially Thomson and Bates, was not Description. Male. Integument dalk bIOl'I'nish, examined and several species were erroneously bases of antennomeres III-XI and basal half of interpreted. Some corrections were provided in a tarsomere V yellowish. General pubescence yel­ later paper (Dillon and Dlllon, 1952) lowlsh mtermixed with glabrous areas and pnnc- In 1979, Martins studied the types of the spe- tures. Two oblique brownishfasciae oneachelytron: cies described by Erichson (1847) and additional one wider at anterior third, the other less evident synonyms and corrections were proposed. Some at posterior third. Apices of pro- and mesotibiae more corrections and descriptions ofnew taxa were dark brown. Inferior ocular lobes shorter than pllbUsbed byMartins (1981) and Martinsand GaJileo genae Antenniferous tubercles projected Anten- (1990). nae longer than body (the eighth antennomere Five new species from Ecuador, Colombia, and attainingeJYtraI apex). Scapeclavate.Antennomere Brazil (Amazonas) are described in this paper and III bisinuate. PrOIlQtum convex; sides sulcate at matelial belonging to the following institutions is basal thild. Sides ofpIOtholax unalmed. IIumelal added: Departamento de Zoologia. Universidade carina attaining middle ofelytra; a minute tubercle Federal do Parana, Curitiba (DZUP); Instituto on the carina immediatly posterior to the humeral 2 Volume 9, nos. 1-2, March-June, 1995, INSECTA MUNDI region. Femora pedunculate andclavate. Mesotibiae swollen. Measurements, in rom. Male. Total length, 7.5· 7.8; prothorax length, 1.4-1.5; prothorax width, 2.0-2.1; elytrallength, 5.3-5.4; humeral width, 2.9. Material. Ecuador. Napo-Pastaza:Limoncocha(250 m). Holotype male (CMNC). paratype male (MZSP), 15·28.VI.1976, S. and J. Peck col. Paratype col· lected in Malaise trap. Discussion. Besides L. humeralis. three other species are included in Lydipta Thomson, 1868: L. pumilio Thomson, 1868, type species; L. conspersa \ (Aurivillius, 1922) and L. senicula (Bates, 1865). I Lydipta humeralis is immediately distinguished by -< ' the tubercle on the humeral carina which is absent 1 2 in the other species. From L. sen.icula, an Amazo­ nian species, L. humeralis can be separated by the yellowish pubescence on the antennal scape with Figures 1-2: L Cocostola obliquata, sp. n., holotype male. few intermixed brown areas and by the sparser 2. Lydipto humeralis. sp. n., holotype male. elytral basal punctures. Measurements, in nun. Holotype female. Total Lochmaeocles leuripennis. new species length, 18.6; prothorax length, 3.0; prothoraxwidth, (Fig. 6). 5.5; elytrallength, 14.1; humeral width, 7.5. Description: Female. Integument dark brownish Material. Colombia. Valle: Anchicaya Dam (70 km red, paler to antennal tips. Frons sparsely orang­ E Buenaventura, 1200') Holotype female, ish-yellow pubescent; the pubescencemore concen­ 21.VII.I970. H. and A. Howden col. (CMNC). The trated in a narrow longitudinal line at sides. In­ left antenna ofthe holotype is broken at the middle ferior ocular lobes twice as long as gena. ofthe scape and the left side ofabdominal sterna IV Antenniferous tubercles projected. Upper ocular and V are destroyed. lobes distant. Vertex and occiput sparsely covered by orangish-yellow pubescence; coronal suture gla­ Discussion. Lochmaeocles leuripennis, and L. brous. Anennaeattainingelytralapices atthe middle pulcher Dillon and Dillon, 1946, are very similar of antennomere IX; antennal pubescence reddish (Figs. 5, 6). Lochmaeocles leuripennis can be imme­ brown, uniform; base of antennomeres III and IV diatelydistinguished (comparisonbetweenfemales) indistinctly paler. Pronotum densely yellowish or­ by the presence of glabrous rounded areas on the ange pubescent, with three glabrous rounded areas pronotum and by the elytral basal granulations (one larger at the middle, two at the sides). Scutel­ sparser. This latter character separates L. lum orangish yellow pubescent. Elytral basal de­ leuripen"is from L. callidryas (Bates, 1866), the clivity white pubescent; remainder of surface dark elytral base of which also has dense granulations. brown with many irregular orangish yellow macu­ lae. Basal elytral granulated punctures sparse, Cacostola obliquata, new species shallow. Prosternal process without transverse el­ (Fig. 1) evation. Venter of thorax covered by white pubes­ cence; metepisterna with yellowish orange pubes· Description: Male. Integumentdark brown; whit· cence intermixed. Yellowish pubescence on ab­ ish integument at base of antennomeres III·VI. dominal sterna and legs. General elytral integument reddish with dark brownish areas especially an oblique belt behind middle. General pubescence whitish, more concen- INSECTA MUNDI, Vol. 9, No. 1-2, March - June, 1995 3 bated at. an oblique "itta anterior to the brownish some short longitudinal areas of brownish pubes­ oblique elytral belt; longitudinal area on apical cence on lateral sides ofposterior third and close to thIrd; and longitudinal sinuous stripe at sides of apex. The whitish pubescence of the obhque vltta abdominal Iilterna Pubelilcence on vertex and prologedposteriorlybysuturalregionbut not reach· pronotum uniform. Upper ocUlar lobes as dIstant as mgthe apIces. Oranglshpubescence onmesepimera the width ofone lobe, inferior ocular lobes twice as and metepisterna; whitish pubescence on long as gena. Antennae attaining elytral apices at mesosternum, metasternum, abdominal sterna I, the tip of antennomere IX, antennomere IV longer base of abdominal sterna II and middle of abdomi­ than III Pronotal disk not transversely rugose, nal sterna VA large glabrous sbiningrmmded area finely punctate. Humeral carma absent. GIbbOSIty at the SIdes of andommal sterna I. lriferlOr ocular at elytral apical fifth scarcely projected. Metatibiae lobes scarcely longer than genae. ",A~ntenniferous swollen. tubercles acuminate. Antennae attaining elytral apical four tho Scape pedunculate and clavate. Description' Female. Antennae shorter than Antennomere III curved, bisinuous; XI scarcely body, bases of antennomeres III-XI whItish; apIcal longer than half of X. Pronotum WIth three third ofantennomeres IV, VI, VIII and X brownililh. gibbolilitielil: one central and two lateral; a little glabrous area at the middle of the basal furrow. Measurenrents, in mIn,respectively male/female. Sides ofprothorax with a minute tubercle at poste- Total length, 7.417.4; prothorax length, 1.2/1.2; rior third. Humeral carina projected, punctate, prothorax WIdth, 1.311.3; elytral length, 5.5/5.5; curved, reaching elytral anterior third. hJlmeral width, 1 7/1 7 Measurements, In rom. Holotype female. Total Material. Ecuador. Manabi: Pto. Cayo (1.5 km E, length, 12.8;prothoraxlength, 2.1; prothoraxwidth, 20 m), holotype male, 28.II.1981, H. Howden col. 3.2; elytrallength, 9.4; humeral width, 4.7. (CMNC); EI Palmar, paratype female, 27.II.1965, L. Pena col. (MZSP). Material. Colombia. Antioquia: V. Medellin, holo- type female, 1.1955, Gallego col. (UNCM). Diseussion. In the key to the species of Cacostola (Dillon and Dillon, 1946: 254), C. obliquata, sp.n., Discussion. The genus Carenesycha was estab­ will key to couplet 13 where C. simplex (Pascoe, lished by Martins and Galileo (1990) for a single 1859) and C. sirena Dillon and Dillon, 1946 are species, C. carenata, described from Ecuador. separated Cacostola obliquata differs from C sim- Gnrenesycha lIelezi presents some morphological plex as follows: antennom~m.l III dililtinctly Iilhorter characters which modify the generic definition' than IV; pronotal pubescence uniform; elytra with tubercle at sides of prothorax mmute; humeral an oblique dark belt at the middle and lacking tubercle absent; presence ofglabrous macula at the longitudinal whitish vittae. Cacostola sirena was sides ofurosternite I. These characters will distin­ originally described from Venezuela and is un- guish C. velezi and C. carenata. Aside from these known to us, but by the original description and characters there are different elytral color patterns figure, the elytra have longitudinal whitililh Vittae in both Iilpecielil Wig 3 and figure 39 In MartIns and and lack a dark oblique belt. Galileo, 1990: 78),
Recommended publications
  • The Beetle Fauna of Dominica, Lesser Antilles (Insecta: Coleoptera): Diversity and Distribution

    The Beetle Fauna of Dominica, Lesser Antilles (Insecta: Coleoptera): Diversity and Distribution

    INSECTA MUNDI, Vol. 20, No. 3-4, September-December, 2006 165 The beetle fauna of Dominica, Lesser Antilles (Insecta: Coleoptera): Diversity and distribution Stewart B. Peck Department of Biology, Carleton University, 1125 Colonel By Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K1S 5B6, Canada stewart_peck@carleton. ca Abstract. The beetle fauna of the island of Dominica is summarized. It is presently known to contain 269 genera, and 361 species (in 42 families), of which 347 are named at a species level. Of these, 62 species are endemic to the island. The other naturally occurring species number 262, and another 23 species are of such wide distribution that they have probably been accidentally introduced and distributed, at least in part, by human activities. Undoubtedly, the actual numbers of species on Dominica are many times higher than now reported. This highlights the poor level of knowledge of the beetles of Dominica and the Lesser Antilles in general. Of the species known to occur elsewhere, the largest numbers are shared with neighboring Guadeloupe (201), and then with South America (126), Puerto Rico (113), Cuba (107), and Mexico-Central America (108). The Antillean island chain probably represents the main avenue of natural overwater dispersal via intermediate stepping-stone islands. The distributional patterns of the species shared with Dominica and elsewhere in the Caribbean suggest stages in a dynamic taxon cycle of species origin, range expansion, distribution contraction, and re-speciation. Introduction windward (eastern) side (with an average of 250 mm of rain annually). Rainfall is heavy and varies season- The islands of the West Indies are increasingly ally, with the dry season from mid-January to mid- recognized as a hotspot for species biodiversity June and the rainy season from mid-June to mid- (Myers et al.
  • (Coleoptera) of Peru Miguel A

    (Coleoptera) of Peru Miguel A

    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Center for Systematic Entomology, Gainesville, Insecta Mundi Florida 2-29-2012 Preliminary checklist of the Cerambycidae, Disteniidae, and Vesperidae (Coleoptera) of Peru Miguel A. Monné Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, [email protected] Eugenio H. Nearns University of New Mexico, [email protected] Sarah C. Carbonel Carril Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Peru, [email protected] Ian P. Swift California State Collection of Arthropods, [email protected] Marcela L. Monné Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/insectamundi Part of the Entomology Commons Monné, Miguel A.; Nearns, Eugenio H.; Carbonel Carril, Sarah C.; Swift, Ian P.; and Monné, Marcela L., "Preliminary checklist of the Cerambycidae, Disteniidae, and Vesperidae (Coleoptera) of Peru" (2012). Insecta Mundi. Paper 717. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/insectamundi/717 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Center for Systematic Entomology, Gainesville, Florida at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Insecta Mundi by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. INSECTA MUNDI A Journal of World Insect Systematics 0213 Preliminary checklist of the Cerambycidae, Disteniidae, and Vesperidae (Coleoptera) of Peru Miguel A. Monné Museu Nacional Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro Quinta da Boa Vista São Cristóvão, 20940-040 Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil Eugenio H. Nearns Department of Biology Museum of Southwestern Biology University of New Mexico Albuquerque, NM 87131-0001, USA Sarah C. Carbonel Carril Departamento de Entomología Museo de Historia Natural Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos Avenida Arenales 1256, Lima, Peru Ian P.
  • Plantas Hospedadoras De Cerambycidae (Coleoptera) En El Noreste De Argentina

    Plantas Hospedadoras De Cerambycidae (Coleoptera) En El Noreste De Argentina

    Rev. Bio!. Trop., 44(3)145(1): 167-175, 1996-1997 Plantas hospedadoras de Cerambycidae (Coleoptera) en el noreste de Argentina Oscar E. Gonzalez' y Osvaldo R. Di Iori02 1 Museo Regional Municipal Sudoeste Chaqueño, (3730) Charata, Chaco, Argentina. Entomología, Departamento de Ciencias Biológicas, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, (1428) Ciudad Universitaria, Buenos Aires, Argentina. E-mai!: Dü[email protected] (Ree. 4-1-1996. Rev. 24-IV-1996. Acep. 8-VIII-1996) Abstraet: New host p1ants and loealities are recorded for 84 species of Cerambycidae of Chaco Province (Chaquenian Dominion) and Paranaense Province (Amazonian Dominion) in northeastem Argentina and Brazil. Host p1ants belong to Anacardiaceae, Asc1epiadaceae, Apocynaceae, Bignoniaceae, Bombacaceae, Cactaceae, Caesalpinaceae, Capparidaceae, Casuarinaceae, Fabaceae, Mimosaceae, Moraceae, Nyctaginaceae, Polygonaceae, Rhamnaceae, Rutaceae, Sapindaceae, Sapotaceae and Ulmaceae.First records for Argentinaand host plants: Compsocerus barbicor­ nis Serville 1834, Desmiphora lenkoi (Lane 1959), Neocompsa serrana (Martins 1962) and Trachysomus dromedarius (Voet 1778). Fírst host plants records of rare or uncornrnon Argentine specíes of Cerambycidae are Methia tubuliven­ tris GounelIe 1913, Paraleptidea femorata GounelIe1913 and Oncideres pepotinga Martíns 1981. Key words: Cerambycidae, host plants, north-eastem Argentina. La presente contribución continúa con la in­ Cuando una localidad se visitó en más de vestigación de plantas hospedadoras de Ce­ una oportunidad, se agrega al lado del nombre rambycidae del noreste de Argentina (Di lorio el año correspondiente al de recolección de la 1994 a): se presentan nuevos registros de loca­ planta de donde emergieron los ejemplares lidades, plantas hospedadoras y correcciones a mencionados; en el caso de plantas taladas más dicha publicación. de una vez, la fecha también se incluye entre paréntesis luego de la abreviatura relativa a la planta.
  • Ethnoentomological and Distributional Notes on Cerambycidae and Other Coleoptera of Guerrero and Puebla,Mexico

    Ethnoentomological and Distributional Notes on Cerambycidae and Other Coleoptera of Guerrero and Puebla,Mexico

    The Coleopterists Bulletin, 71(2): 301–314. 2017. ETHNOENTOMOLOGICAL AND DISTRIBUTIONAL NOTES ON CERAMBYCIDAE AND OTHER COLEOPTERA OF GUERRERO AND PUEBLA,MEXICO JONATHAN D. AMITH Research Affiliate, Department of Anthropology, Gettysburg College, Campus Box 2895, Gettysburg, PA 17325, U.S.A. and Research Associate, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC 20013-7012, U.S.A. AND STEVEN W. LINGAFELTER Systematic Entomology Laboratory, Agriculture Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution,Washington, DC 20013-7012, U.S.A. Current address: 8920 South Bryerly Ct., Hereford, AZ 85615, U.S.A. ABSTRACT This article presents both ethnoentomological notes on Nahuatl and Mixtec language terms as they are applied to Cerambycidae (Coleoptera) and distributional records for species collected during three projects carried out in the states of Guerrero and Puebla, Mexico. Some comparative data from other Mesoamerican and Native American languages are discussed. Indigenous common names are mapped onto current taxonomic nomenclature, and an analysis is offered of the logical basis for Indigenous classification: the exclusion of some cerambycids and the inclusion of other beetles in the nominal native “cerambycid” category. New state distributional records for the Cerambycidae collected in this study are offered for Guerrero: Bebelis picta Pascoe, Callipogon senex Dupont, Neocompsa macrotricha Martins, Olenosus ser- rimanus Bates, Ornithia mexicana zapotensis Tippmann, Stenygra histrio Audinet-Serville, Strongylaspis championi Bates, Lissonotus flavocinctus puncticollis Bates, and Nothopleurus lobigenis Bates; and Puebla: Juiaparus mexicanus (Thomson), Ptychodes guttulatus Dillon and Dillon, and Steirastoma senex White. Key Words: linguistics, etymology, Nahuatl, Mixtec, longhorned beetle, wood-borer DOI.org/10.1649/0010-065X-71.2.301 The present article emerges from two language shapes.
  • Section IV – Guideline for the Texas Priority Species List

    Section IV – Guideline for the Texas Priority Species List

    Section IV – Guideline for the Texas Priority Species List Associated Tables The Texas Priority Species List……………..733 Introduction For many years the management and conservation of wildlife species has focused on the individual animal or population of interest. Many times, directing research and conservation plans toward individual species also benefits incidental species; sometimes entire ecosystems. Unfortunately, there are times when highly focused research and conservation of particular species can also harm peripheral species and their habitats. Management that is focused on entire habitats or communities would decrease the possibility of harming those incidental species or their habitats. A holistic management approach would potentially allow species within a community to take care of themselves (Savory 1988); however, the study of particular species of concern is still necessary due to the smaller scale at which individuals are studied. Until we understand all of the parts that make up the whole can we then focus more on the habitat management approach to conservation. Species Conservation In terms of species diversity, Texas is considered the second most diverse state in the Union. Texas has the highest number of bird and reptile taxon and is second in number of plants and mammals in the United States (NatureServe 2002). There have been over 600 species of bird that have been identified within the borders of Texas and 184 known species of mammal, including marine species that inhabit Texas’ coastal waters (Schmidly 2004). It is estimated that approximately 29,000 species of insect in Texas take up residence in every conceivable habitat, including rocky outcroppings, pitcher plant bogs, and on individual species of plants (Riley in publication).
  • Zootaxa, Catalogue of Family-Group Names in Cerambycidae

    Zootaxa, Catalogue of Family-Group Names in Cerambycidae

    Zootaxa 2321: 1–80 (2009) ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Monograph ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2009 · Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) ZOOTAXA 2321 Catalogue of family-group names in Cerambycidae (Coleoptera) YVES BOUSQUET1, DANIEL J. HEFFERN2, PATRICE BOUCHARD1 & EUGENIO H. NEARNS3 1Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Central Experimental Farm, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0C6. E-mail: [email protected]; [email protected] 2 10531 Goldfield Lane, Houston, TX 77064, USA. E-mail: [email protected] 3 Department of Biology, Museum of Southwestern Biology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131-0001, USA. E-mail: [email protected] Corresponding author: [email protected] Magnolia Press Auckland, New Zealand Accepted by Q. Wang: 2 Dec. 2009; published: 22 Dec. 2009 Yves Bousquet, Daniel J. Heffern, Patrice Bouchard & Eugenio H. Nearns CATALOGUE OF FAMILY-GROUP NAMES IN CERAMBYCIDAE (COLEOPTERA) (Zootaxa 2321) 80 pp.; 30 cm. 22 Dec. 2009 ISBN 978-1-86977-449-3 (paperback) ISBN 978-1-86977-450-9 (Online edition) FIRST PUBLISHED IN 2009 BY Magnolia Press P.O. Box 41-383 Auckland 1346 New Zealand e-mail: [email protected] http://www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ © 2009 Magnolia Press All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored, transmitted or disseminated, in any form, or by any means, without prior written permission from the publisher, to whom all requests to reproduce copyright material should be directed in writing. This authorization does not extend to any other kind of copying, by any means, in any form, and for any purpose other than private research use.
  • Example Insect Natural History Data

    Example Insect Natural History Data

    Example Insect Natural History Data These data were assembled by participants of a workshop held at the University of Florida from May 30 to June 1 of 2018. The data cover all five major insect orders (Coleoptera, Diptera, Hemiptera, Hymenoptera, Lepidoptera) and represent most of the various kinds of natural history information found on insect specimen labels. The data also include representative natural history information from literature sources and online databases. For more information about how these data were assembled and why, see Stucky et al. (2019) __________. Except for works in the public domain, data use licenses are as specified by the original data owners. Coleoptera Example 1 Taxonomy: Coleoptera: Buprestidae: Acmaeodera sp. Record type: database Life stage(s): adult Source: iNaturalist Record URL: https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/12840335 Comments and relevant content: "Feeding on wildflowers in an open meadow in the midlands of South Carolina." Example 2 Taxonomy: Coleoptera: Cerambycidae Record type: literature Source: Paro et al. (2011) Relevant text: "Table 1. Association between girdled and available host-plants (listed alphabetically) and Onciderini beetles in Serra do Japi from 2002 to 2006." The table gives the percentages of each plant species that were girdled along with associated beetle species. Example 3 Taxonomy: Coleoptera: Cerambycidae: Rhaesus serricollis Record type: literature Source: Sama et al. (2010) Relevant text: "Host plants: Polyphagous on deciduous trees like Platanus (Platanaceae), Ficus
  • Appendix 2. Species Lists of the Beetles, Non-Beetle Hexa- Pods and Non-Hexapod Invertebrates of Montserrat M

    Appendix 2. Species Lists of the Beetles, Non-Beetle Hexa- Pods and Non-Hexapod Invertebrates of Montserrat M

    Appendix 2. Species lists of the beetles, non-beetle hexa- pods and non-hexapod invertebrates of Montserrat M. A. Ivie, K. A. Marske, I. A. Foley & L. L. Ivie The beetles of Montserrat: an annotated checkllist Below are listed all of the beetles known to us from Montserrat, organized by family. Each has a name at the level we are able to assign it. Each has a code indicating the species’ distributional status (Table A), from single island endemic to invasive exotic. The symbol “?” associated with this ranking, indicates our lack of knowledge of a particular taxon. Following the distributional code is the original citation (if any) of the species from Montserrat, as well as any notes. This format is also followed for the sections on non‐beetle hexapods and the non‐hexapods invertebrates. Table A. Key to Distributional Status Distributional status Code Description Island Endemic IE Montserrat only Local Endemic LE Few islands, i.e St. Kitts, Montserrat & Guadeloupe Leeward Island Endemic LIE Sombrero to Dominica North Eastern Caribbean NEC Puerto Rico to Dominica Endemic Lesser Antilles Endemic LAE Sombrero to Grenada West Indian Endemic WIE Not on mainland, or only south Florida Widespread Native WN West Indies and Mainland S. America and Lesser SA Sombrero to Grenada & S. America Antilles Native Native N? Full distribution unknown Exotic EIS Invasive Species (exotic species not introduced on purpose) Biological Control Agent EBC Exotic spp introduced for beneficial purpose Status Uncertain ? Identity not yet ascertained, or range in dispute COLEOPTERA Rhysodidae Clinidium (s.str.) n.sp. nr planum IE Carabidae (determined by George Ball and Danny Shpeley, with individual species determined by Wendy Moore, James Liebherr and Terry Erwin) Cicindela trifasciata Fabricius WN Eohomopterus n.sp.
  • Download Download

    Download Download

    August 30 2019 INSECTA 7 urn:lsid:zoobank. A Journal of World Insect Systematics org:pub:49F18AF8-FEE4- UNDI M 4E5B-9C21-C59B474C02B6 0725 Onciderini Thomson, 1860 (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae: Lamiinae) types of the Museum für Naturkunde - Leibniz Institute for Evolution and Biodiversity Science, Berlin (ZMHB) Eugenio H. Nearns National Identification Services (NIS) USDA APHIS PPQ Plant Health Programs National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution Washington, DC 20560 USA Francisco E. de L. Nascimento Museu de Zoologia, Universidade de São Paulo São Paulo, SP, Brazil Date of issue: August 30, 2019 CENTER FOR SYSTEMATIC ENTOMOLOGY, INC., Gainesville, FL Eugenio H. Nearns and Francisco E. de L. Nascimento Onciderini Thomson, 1860 (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae: Lamiinae) types of the Museum für Naturkunde - Leibniz Institute for Evolution and Biodiversity Science, Berlin (ZMHB) Insecta Mundi 0725: 1–7 ZooBank Registered: urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:49F18AF8-FEE4-4E5B-9C21-C59B474C02B6 Published in 2019 by Center for Systematic Entomology, Inc. P.O. Box 141874 Gainesville, FL 32614-1874 USA http://centerforsystematicentomology.org/ Insecta Mundi is a journal primarily devoted to insect systematics, but articles can be published on any non- marine arthropod. Topics considered for publication include systematics, taxonomy, nomenclature, checklists, faunal works, and natural history. Insecta Mundi will not consider works in the applied sciences (i.e. medical entomology, pest control research, etc.), and no longer publishes book reviews or editorials. Insecta Mundi publishes original research or discoveries in an inexpensive and timely manner, distributing them free via open access on the internet on the date of publication. Insecta Mundi is referenced or abstracted by several sources, including the Zoological Record and CAB Abstracts.
  • Redalyc.Escarabajos Longicornios (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae)De Colombia

    Redalyc.Escarabajos Longicornios (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae)De Colombia

    Biota Colombiana ISSN: 0124-5376 [email protected] Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos "Alexander von Humboldt" Colombia Martínez, Claudia Escarabajos Longicornios (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae)de Colombia Biota Colombiana, vol. 1, núm. 1, 2000, pp. 76-105 Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos "Alexander von Humboldt" Bogotá, Colombia Disponible en: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=49110104 Cómo citar el artículo Número completo Sistema de Información Científica Más información del artículo Red de Revistas Científicas de América Latina, el Caribe, España y Portugal Página de la revista en redalyc.org Proyecto académico sin fines de lucro, desarrollado bajo la iniciativa de acceso abierto Biota Colombiana 1 (1) 76 - 105, 2000 Escarabajos Longicornios (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) de Colombia Claudia Martínez A.A.: 77038 Santafé de Bogotá 2 D.C.- Colombia. [email protected] Palabras clave: Cerambycidae, Coleoptera, Colombia. Los escarabajos longicornios de la familia ralmente a ciertos grupos de géneros), y por lo tanto, pue- Cerambycidae (Polyphaga: Chrysomeloidea) constituyen den ser excelentes indicadores del estado de conservación uno de los grupos más grandes de Coleoptera, con aproxi- de un ecosistema (Hovore 1998). madamente 35.000 especies en el mundo (Minelli 1993). En general, los cerambícidos se reconocen por sus tarsos Importancia económica pseudopentámeros, presencia de tubérculos antenales y antenas con una longitud que va desde un cuarto hasta 2 y Ecológicamente los cerambícidos son muy importantes en 3 veces el largo del cuerpo. La familia más cercana es la de el proceso de la circulación de los minerales hacia el suelo, los escarabajos de las hojas, Chrysomelidae, que carecen dado que, al igual que la mayoría de escarabajos de tubérculos antenales y antenas largas.
  • (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) Diego De Santana Souza Curitiba 2017

    (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) Diego De Santana Souza Curitiba 2017

    UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO PARANÁ FILOGENIA MOLECULAR DE LAMIINAE (COLEOPTERA: CERAMBYCIDAE) DIEGO DE SANTANA SOUZA CURITIBA 2017 0 UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO PARANÁ FILOGENIA MOLECULAR DE LAMIINAE (COLEOPTERA: CERAMBYCIDAE) DIEGO DE SANTANA SOUZA Tese apresentada ao Programa de Pós-graduação em Ciências Biológicas (Entomologia) da Universidade Federal do Paraná como requisito parcial à obtenção do grau de Doutor em Ciências Biológicas. Orientadora: Dra. Luciane Marinoni. Co-orientadores: Dr. Jesús Gómez-Zurita (CSIC–UPF) e Dra. Marcela Laura Monné (MNRJ). CURITIBA, PARANÁ, BRASIL MARÇO DE 2017 1 2 3 AGRADECIMENTOS Aos meus orientadores, Dra. Luciane Marinoni, Dr. Jesús Gómez-Zurita e Dra. Marcela Monné, pela amizade, dedicação com a orientação, confiança e incentivo constante. Ao Dr. Miguel Monné pela disponibilidade e ajuda com a identificação das espécies. Ao Dr. Petr Švácha pela disponibilidade e atenção durante a visita ao Institute of Entomology, em České Budějovice, República Tcheca, pela doação de material e pelas valiosas sugestões para a discussão deste estudo. Aos colegas de laboratório, especialmente Marcoandre Savaris e Silvana Lampert pela ajuda com as coletas e pela doação de material coletado em álcool absoluto. À Anabela Cardoso pela disponibilidade, paciência e ajuda laboratorial oferecida durante o doutorado sanduíche no Institut de Biologia Evolutiva, em Barcelona, Espanha. A Nikolaos-Panagiotis Vlachopoulos, pela ajuda com a obtenção de sequências e alinhamento da estrutura secundária de 28S rRNA. À CAPES, pela concessão da bolsa de doutorado no Brasil. Ao CNPq, através do programa Ciência sem Fronteiras, e ao Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC), pelo suporte financeiro fornecido durante o período de doutorado sanduíche no exterior.
  • TCAP Coordinator, TPWD

    TCAP Coordinator, TPWD

    TEXAS CONSERVATION ACTION PLAN Gulf Coast Prairies and Marshes DRAFT ECOREGION HANDBOOK JUNE 2011 Note: text in red in this document will be revised between June 10 Public Comment Draft and the final USFWS-approved document. THIS IS A SUMMARY of the HANDBOOK; more background information will be added. In accordance with Texas State Depository Law, this publication is available at the Texas State Publications Clearinghouse and/or Texas Depository Libraries. © Texas Parks and Wildlife Department PWD insert number when approved Citing this document: Texas Parks and Wildlife Department. 2011. Texas Conservation Action Plan 2011 – 2016: Gulf Coast Prairies and Marshes Handbook. Editor, Wendy Connally, Texas Conservation Action Plan Coordinator. PWD insert number when approved. Austin, Texas. Contents SUMMARY ..................................................................................................................................................... 1 HOW TO GET INVOLVED ............................................................................................................................... 2 OVERVIEW ..................................................................................................................................................... 3 RARE SPECIES and COMMUNITIES .............................................................................................................. 14 PRIORITY HABITATS ....................................................................................................................................