DOCSLIB.ORG

Exploring Ukraine

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

#8 (102) August 2016 How economic decline and war Why privatization How Ukrainian Avant-garde started affect crime scene in Ukraine of Odesa Port Plant failed and ended in the 1920s EXPLORING UKRAINE WWW.UKRAINIANWEEK.COM Featuring selected content from The Economist FOR FREE DISTRIBUTION CONTENTS | 3 BRIEFING NEIGHBOURS 4 General test: What will follow the 25 Old faultlines: arrest of the odious ex-Regional How tensions over Erdogan affect Oleksandr Yefremov Turkish minority in Germany POLITICS 26 What are we fighting for? 7 Oleksiy Donskiy: “Sometimes lawyers Philippe de Lara on where European defending a lower level official are politicians are wrong on current protecting the interests challenges of the kingpin” 29 Calm after the storm: Senior GPU prosecutor Ghia Nodia of the Caucasus on investigation of crimes Institute for Peace, Democracy and by ex-prosecutor Viktor Pshonka and Development on Georgia’s domestic interference with his work political scene and voters’ preferences in the run-up to elections ECONOMICS 32 In search of a Suliko: 10 Just not yet: Why Odesa Port Plant Kornely Kakachia from the Georgian privatization auction failed Institute of Politics on what shapes 12 We can’t—or we won’t? Georgia’s foreign policy and how How Ukraine’s imports changed people perceive it at home in the past two years 34 The once and future kings of Georgia: SOCIETY A short history of attempts to restore 16 What they’re saying and showing: the Georgian monarchy The Ukrainian Week looks at the FOCUS editorial policies and ideological 38 Handmade tourism: positions of Ukrainian media outlets Where to go for authentic and 18 The new era of crime: unusual experiences in Ukraine How the past two years have changed 42 Museums of enthusiasm: Ukraine’s crime scene How amateurs build unique 20 A spinoff of war: collections of art and artifacts How war veterans and volunteers in their hometowns become criminals 45 The pain of changes: 22 Ditte Marcher: “When a soldier Travel blogger Bogdan Logvynenko returns home, it doesn't mean that on Ukraine’s underappreciated tourist he is at home already” potential and the role of locals Director of Bodynamic International in keeping it that way and the founder of a rehabilitation CULTURE & ARTS program for the military on 46 The rise and fall of Avant-garde: understanding of war, forgiveness, An artistic provocation of the 1920s and ways to cope with the trauma that outraged the proletariat E-mail [email protected] www.ukrainianweek.com Tel. (044) 351-13-00 The Ukrainian Week #8 (102) August 2016 Editors address 37 Mashynobudivna str., Kyiv, 03067, Ukraine Founder ECEM Media GmbH. Publisher ECEM Media GmbH Print run 15 000. Free distribution Address Austria, Am Gestade,1, 1010 Vienna Our partner State registration certificate КВ № 19823-9623ПР 19.03.2013 Chief Editor Dmytro Krapyvenko Editors Anna Korbut, Lidia Wolanskyj #8 (102) August 2016| THE UKRAINIAN WEEK THE UKRAINIAN WEEK | #8 (102) August 2016 BRIEFING General test Stanislav Kozliuk igh-profile arrests have been expected for a very long time. For over two years now, Ukrainians have been demanding punishment for those in power who were guilty of es- calating events on the Maidan and then the war in Donbas. The question “Why aren’t the HRegionals being punished?” is hotter than ever, and it’s only recently that the Prosecutor General’s Office has tried to answer it. Now Oleksandr Yefremov, ex-Head of Luhansk Oblast State Administration, then First Deputy Head of the Party of Regions and generally one of the more odious ex-Regionals, is sitting in jail awaiting trial. “I want to cry with all my heart that I’m not guilty,” Oleksandr Yefremov whines from his cell in the stuffy hall. “It’s impossible when the entire state machine is working against you.” The one- time head of the Party of the Regions faction in the Verkhovna Rada is now the #1 suspect in a case over separatism. Yefremov is unlikely to get used to being in the defendant’s seat. In winter 2014-15, when Vik- tor Shokin was the Prosecutor General, they tried to arrest him for the show-of-hands vote on the “draconian laws” on January 16, 2014. At that time, Yefremov was incriminated for overstepping his authority and stirring inter-ethnic enmity. But by February, he was released under bail and KOZLIUK STANISLAV BY PHOTO fitted with an electronic bracelet. Later, the fine print in Ukrainian laws allowed Yefremov to get #8 (102) August 2016| THE UKRAINIAN WEEK 6 | BRIEFING | rid of even that, get back his passport and freely move This was probably the first hint that “cutting a deal” around in Ukraine. with the justice system did not work this time. So it Later he was jailed once again. On July 30, 2016, at looks as though the PGO has actually managed to put 07:28, he was removed from an Austrian Airlines flight together some more-or-less serious evidence of Yefre- enroute to Vienna and arrested right in Boryspil Airport. mov’s guilt in events from two years ago. Here, there is This time, he was accused by the Prosecutor General of his likely role in the takeover of Oblast State Adminis- far more serious crimes: acting in a way to change the ter- tration and SBU buildings in Luhansk (see The surren- ritorial boundaries of Ukraine, providing organizational der of Luhansk SBU at ukrainianweek.com for more and other support at the time when LNR was emerging, details), and in organizing demonstrations in support of and, for the icing on the cake, of stealing assets belonging Donbas joining Russia. to LuhanskVuhillia, the regional coal association. Testimony about these events began to come from Had the accusations been limited to just this last Tornado, the scandalous volunteer battalion, in particu- item, Mr. Yefremov might have easily expected that he lar Mykola Tsukur. They claim that their first testimony would once again be released on bail and the familiar from 2014 mysteriously disappeared from the military little bracelet on his arm. However, infringing on the prosecutor’s office. And now the GPO has to reconstruct territorial integrity of the country was a far more seri- them. The Tornado witnesses also clamed that Yefre- ous accusation. At this point, there was no alternative to mov’s people tried to negotiate with them, but they re- detention in a pre-trial facility, known as SIZO in Ukrai- fused to cooperate. Not long ago, another ex-PR deputy nian. The intriguing question at the court hearing this and Yefremov’s fellow homeboy, Volodymyr Landik, time was just one: Would the former PR leader walk free showed up again. In his recent comments to the press, this time and how would he manage that? There were Landik has openly accused Yefremov of being a princi- two possible options: violations of procedure during the pal in these crimes. arrest of the politician which would allow the infamous After the fiasco of their first delaying tactics, Yefre- Pechersk Court to let the suspect go free, or a simple de- mov’s lawyers decided to try another approach: they lay in the process. In the second case, the lawyers had to proposed examining the evidence presented to the PGO drag the court hearing out until the morning of August and, if possible, interrogating witnesses. This would 2. That would pass the 72-hour time limit during which have meant the court not only working until dawn but preventive measures with regard to the suspect needed actually sitting without interruption in the courtroom to be decided and Yefremov would then be free as the for several days. The folks in the black gowns did not wind in the Luhansk steppes. agree to this and remained implacable: the norms of the Criminal Procedural Code stated that when selecting preventive measures, there was no obligation to engage THE EX-PR LEADER IN THE RADA HAS BEEN SENTENCED in a detailed review of the materials of the case. At this, TO TWO MONTHS IN THE SIZO. HE HAS LITTLE REASON the court withdrew to the deliberation chambers. It be- came clear that, unless Yefremov suddenly became sick TO FEEL OPTIMISTIC BECAUSE HIS CASE IS INTENDED TO and an ambulance appeared on the scene, by evening he BE A DEMONSTRATION would be in an SBU detention cell. Perhaps the situation would have changed had there been any associates of the Luhansk Regional, but not For the PGO, this arrest was an all-or-nothing move. one PR or Opposition Bloc deputy showed up. At pre- If it won, that is, if it got to arrest the odious Regional, vious hearings, Yefremov’s support group included Na- the PGO could get to wear a big star for “downing a pilot” talia Korolevska, Yuriy Voropayev, Tetiana Bakhteyeva, and show everyone who had accused it of doing noth- and Mykhailo Dobkin, but this time the “boss of Lu- ing to investigate so many cases related to separatism, hansk Country” was left pretty much on his own with that it had put a blue-and-white politician behind bars. the prosecutors. The overwhelming impression was In other words, “We may be working slowly, but we’re that his former comrades had decided to write off their working. Expect more arrests.” colleague. Instead, the room was filled with his oppo- But if the PGO lost and Yefremov was released, there nents: Narodniy Front’s Andriy Levus and Yuriy Ber- would not have been enough fingers on the hands in all eza, Samopomich’s Semen Semenchenko and Svoboda’s four sides of the courtroom to calculate the loss of repu- Yuriy Levchenko.
Recommended publications
  • Pre-Election Monitoring of October 8, 2016 Parliamentary Elections Second Interim Report July 17 - August 8

    Pre-Election Monitoring of October 8, 2016 Parliamentary Elections Second Interim Report July 17 - August 8

    International Society for Fair Elections and Democracy Pre-Election Monitoring of October 8, 2016 Parliamentary Elections Second Interim Report July 17 - August 8 Publishing this report is made possible by the generous support of the American people, through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) and the National Endowment for Democracy (NED). The views expressed in this report belong solely to ISFED and may not necessarily reflect the views of the USAID, the United States Government and the NED. 1. Introduction The International Society for Fair Elections and Democracy (ISFED) has been monitoring October 8, 2016 elections of the Parliament of Georgia and Ajara Supreme Council since July 1, with support from the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) and the National Endowment for Democracy (NED). The present report covers the period from July 18 to August 8, 2016. 2. Key Findings Compared to the previous reporting period, campaigning by political parties and candidates has become more intense. ISFED long-term observers (LTOs) monitored a total of 114 meetings of electoral subjects with voters throughout Georgia, from July 18 through August 7. As the election campaigning moved into a more active phase, the number of election violations grew considerably. Failure of relevant authorities to take adequate actions in response to these violations may pose a threat to free and fair electoral environment. During the reporting period ISFED found 4 instances of intimidation/harassment based on political affiliation, 2 cases of physical violence, 3 cases of possible vote buying, 4 cases of campaigning by unauthorized persons, 8 cases of misuse of administrative resources, 4 cases of interference with pre- election campaigning, 4 cases of use of hate speech, 7 cases of local self-governments making changes in budgets for social and infrastructure projects; 3 cases of misconduct by election commission members.
  • The Relevance of the Actual Values of the Political Actors of Georgia with the Ideologies Declared by Them

    The Relevance of the Actual Values of the Political Actors of Georgia with the Ideologies Declared by Them

    The Relevance of the Actual Values of the Political Actors of Georgia with the Ideologies Declared by Them Dr. Maia Urushadze1, Dr. Tamar Kiknadze2 1Caucasus International University 2Head of the Doctoral Program in Political Science, Caucasus International University Abstract The permanent ideological impact of the propaganda narratives of powerful political entities on the international community is perceived as one of the most important challenges of the 21st century. The international agenda is full of controversial interpretations, produced by powerful international political actors. As a result, the international media agenda is getting like the battlespace for the struggle of interpretations, where the ruthless kind of "frame-games" between the strongest global agenda-setting political entities takes place. The information field is open for all countries, including the small states, where political parties are not strong enough to have their propaganda to resist the ideological pressure from outside. Due to this, the societies of these countries are still easily influenced by the narratives of global political actors creating a suitable psychological environment for internal conflicts in societies. We consider Georgia among these states. Therefore, our research aimed to study the relevance of the actual values of local (Georgian) political actors with the ideologies declared by them. In this regard, our primary objective was to understand the specifics of strategic communication of local political actors, then, to compare their narratives with the rhetoric of international actors, and finally, to determine the strength of local society's resistance to these narratives. We hope that in this way we can assess the long-term impact of global actors’ propaganda communication could have on a small country.
  • Pre-Election Media Monitoring, Interim Report

    Pre-Election Media Monitoring, Interim Report

    PRE-ELECTION MEDIA MONITORING INTERIM REPORT მედიის განვითარების ფონდი MEDIA DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION 1 APRIL - 31 JULY, 2016 Authors: TAMAR KHORBALADZE Peer review: JEAN MARIE COAT, FPU Expert Researchers: TAMAR GAGNIASHVILI, SOPHO GOGADZE, KHATIA LOMIDZE, ROMAN BAINDURASHVILI, TAMAR SOPROMADZE, TINA GOGOLADZE, IRAKLI TSKHADADZE, MARIAM TSUTSKIRIDZE, NATIA GOGELIA, NATIA GOGOLASHVILI, DALI KURDADZE Editor: TAMAR KINTSURASHVILI Designed by BESIK DANELIA / IBDesign The report is prepared by Media Development Foundation (MDF) in the framework of the project “Transparent and Accountable Media for Enhancing Democratic Practices during Elections” supported by the Embassy of the Kingdom of the Netherlands in Georgia. The contents of this report is the sole responsibility of the MDF and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Embassy. ©2016, MEDIA DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION MDFGEORGIA.GE MEDIAMETER.GE/GE Media Development Foundation (MDF) is conducting a pre-election media monitoring from April 1 to October 31, 2016. The monitoring is carried out with the financial support of the Embassy of the Kingdom of Netherlands in Georgia within the frame of the project Transparent and Accountable Media for Enhancing Democratic Practices during Elections. The aim of the project is to study how political subjects are represented in qualitative and quantitative terms in primetime news programs of TV channels and in online media; to clarify whether media provides citizens with relevant information to help them make an informed choice. The aim of the project also is to reveal essential problems through publicizing the findings of the research and attract citizens‟ attention to the reliability of their sources. The methodology for MDF‟s monitoring was developed by Dominique Thierry, consultant of Free Press Unlimited (FPU).
  • Young Researchers in the Global World: Vistas and Challenges

    Young Researchers in the Global World: Vistas and Challenges

    MINISTRY OF EDUCATION AND SCIENCE OF UKRAINE O. M. BEKETOV NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF URBAN ECONOMY IN KHARKIV TESOL-UKRAINE CENTER OF FOREIGN LANGUAGES (NUUE) YOUNG RESEARCHERS IN THE GLOBAL WORLD: VISTAS AND CHALLENGES BOOK OF PAPERS OF THE INTERNATIONAL FORUM FOR YOUNG RESEARCHERS (April 11, 2019) Kharkiv – O. M. Beketov NUUE – 2019 УДК [339.9:303.8-053.81](06) Y70 Редакційна колегія: Сухонос М. К. – доктор технічних наук, професор, проректор з наукової роботи Харківського національного університету міського господарства імені О. М. Бекетова; Ільєнко О. Л. – кандидат філологічних наук, доцент, завідувач кафедри іноземних мов Харківського національного університету міського господарства імені О. М. Бекетова; Крохмаль А. М. – кандидат педагогічних наук, доцент кафедри іноземних мов Харківського національного університету міського господарства імені О. М. Бекетова; Зубенко С. О. – старший викладач кафедри іноземних мов Харківського національного університету міського господарства імені О. М. Бекетова; Максименко Ю. С. – викладач кафедри іноземних мов Харківського національного університету міського господарства імені О. М. Бекетова Young Researchers in the Global World : Vistas and Challenges : Book of Y70 Papers of the International Forum for Young Researchers, Kharkiv, April 11, 2019 yr. / O. M. Beketov National University of Urban Econомy in Kharkiv, TESOL-Ukraine [and oth.]. – Kharkiv : O. M. Beketov NUUE in Kharkiv, 2019. – 301 p. ISBN 978-966-695-490-2 Збірник містить матеріали Міжнародного форуму «Молоді дослідники у глобалізованому світі: перспективи та виклики», який відбувся у квітні 2019 року в Харківському національному університеті міського господарства імені О. М. Бекетова на базі кафедри іноземних мов. УДК [339.9:303.8-053.81](06) © Колектив авторів, 2019 ISBN 978-966-695-490-2 © Харківський національний університет міського господарства імені О.
  • Tamar Orjonikidze Georgian Diaspora and Current Diaspora Policy In

    Tamar Orjonikidze Georgian Diaspora and Current Diaspora Policy In

    Tamar Orjonikidze I. Javakhishvili Tbilisi State University Ph.D candidate in political sciences Georgian Diaspora and Current Diaspora Policy in Georgia Abstract Apart from historical diasporas, over million Georgian citizens reside abroad these days. Majority of them who went abroad in search of jobs should be considered migrants. Diaspora has great importance both for their families and Georgian economy. Therefore, Georgia needs to have a well-considered diaspora policy in place. Studying the interest spheres of diaspora members, their problems, the ways of strengthening their links with Georgia and developing the relevant policy is the biggest challenge for Georgian political parties, especially for the ruling party, which is responsible for carrying out the adequate diaspora policy. In this article we will try to look at the present day diaspora policy for which purpose we will discuss “2016-2020 Migration Strategy of Georgia”, the document developed by the ruling party (“Georgian Dream”) and carry out content analysis of 2016 election platform on diaspora of the above party and make comparisons. Key words: Georgia; Georgian diaspora; Diaspora policy. Introduction Unfortunately, the State Minister’s Office on Diaspora Issues does not have any accurate data on the number of citizens of the present day Georgian diaspora, since, on their explanation, the majority of our compatriots reside abroad illegally; consequently, they are not registered with the Consular Record Division. Besides, the intensiveness of movement from country to country is rather high. Although there are no exact data on the number of Georgian citizens residing outside the country, the fact is that this figure is quite high.
  • Intra-Party Democracy in the Georgian Political System

    Intra-Party Democracy in the Georgian Political System

    INTRA-PARTY DEMOCRACY IN THE GEORGIAN POLITICAL SYSTEM BAKUR KVASHILAVA eecmd.org INTRA-PARTY DEMOCRACY IN DEMOCRACY INTRA-PARTY THE GEORGIAN POLITICAL SYSTEM THE GEORGIAN POLITICAL The publication was commissioned by the Eastern European Centre for Multiparty Democ- racy (EECMD) as part of the Enhancing Institutional and Electoral Capacities of Democratic Political Parties project funded by the Danish Institute for Parties and Democracy (DIPD). The author is responsible for the content of this publication, and the opinions expressed in it do not necessarily reflect the views of the EECMD and DIPD. eecmd.org CONTENT 01 INTRODUCTION 05 METHODOLOGY 09 RESEARCH FINDINGS APPENDIX eecmd.org 21 INTRODUCTION Political parties play a significant role in the modern state. It is difficult to imagine running a country without them. There are still countries where no political parties exist; however, these are exceptions to the norm. Without political parties, it is difficult for the government of any 1 country to solve the complex and diverse issues that the modern state is responsible for solv- ing. Foreign policy, economics, social security, education, environmental protection, public development, law enforcement – this is just a small and general list of functions performed by a state in the modern world. When political parties do not function, we are dealing either with a government based on antiquated principles or with a microstate with a population of less than 20,000. Political parties are an integral part of modern reality and perform their functions not only in democratic nations but also even in authoritarian regimes. INTRA-PARTY DEMOCRACY IN DEMOCRACY INTRA-PARTY THE GEORGIAN POLITICAL SYSTEM THE GEORGIAN POLITICAL Naturally, political parties have a special role to play in a democratic system as the optimal means of gaining power.
  • CAUCASUS ANALYTICAL DIGEST No. 89, 15 November 2016 2

    CAUCASUS ANALYTICAL DIGEST No. 89, 15 November 2016 2

    No. 89 15 November 2016 Abkhazia South Ossetia caucasus Adjara analytical digest Nagorno- Karabakh www.laender-analysen.de/cad www.css.ethz.ch/en/publications/cad.html PARLIAMENTARY ELECTIONS IN GEORGIA Special Editor: Tatia Chikhladze, Research Centre for East European Studies at the University of Bremen ■■Undecided Voters in 2016: Leaning Towards a Multi-Party System? 2 Tamar Iakobidze, Tbilisi ■■Georgia’s Parliamentary Elections—a Step Forward? 6 Tornike Zurabashvili, Tbilisi ■■Implication of Increased Anti-Western Propaganda in the Election Results 10 Teona Turashvili, Tbilisi ■■DOCUMENTATION The Results of the Georgian Parliamentary Elections 14 This publication has been produced within the Innovative Training Network “Caspian” which is funded by an MSCA grant of the European Union in the context of Horizon 2020 (Grant agreement no: 642709). This publication reflects only the authors’ views. The funding body is not responsible for any use that may be made of the information it contains. Research Centre Center Caucasus Research German Association for for East European Studies for Security Studies Resource Centers East European Studies University of Bremen ETH Zurich CAUCASUS ANALYTICAL DIGEST No. 89, 15 November 2016 2 Undecided Voters in 2016: Leaning Towards a Multi-Party System? Tamar Iakobidze, Tbilisi Abstract The Georgian political party system has been marked by radical polarization between the Georgian Dream (GD) and the United National Movement (UNM) since 2012. However, the Parliamentary Elections in 2016 have shown growing indecision among voters, which indicates dissatisfaction with both GD and UNM as well as the need for a third alternative. Examining the profile of undecided voters and their behavior dur- ing the 2016 October elections gives insight into the prospects of a multi-party system in Georgia.
  • Georgia's Parliamentary Election: the Final Report of IRI's Long-Term

    Georgia's Parliamentary Election: the Final Report of IRI's Long-Term

    GEORGIA'S PARLIAMENTARY ELECTION OCTOBER 8 AND OCTOBER 30, 2016 The Final Report of IRI’s Long-Term Observation Mission GEORGIA'S PARLIAMENTARY ELECTION OCTOBER 8 AND OCTOBER 30, 2016 The Final Report of IRI’s Long-Term Observation Mission December 2016 International Republican Institute www.IRI.org | @IRIGlobal © 2016 All Rights Reserved Georgia Parliamentary Election Report Copyright © 2016 International Republican Institute. All rights reserved. Permission Statement: No part of this work may be reproduced in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system without the written permission of the International Republican Institute. Requests for permission should include the following information: • The title of the document for which permission to copy material is desired. • A description of the material for which permission to copy is desired. • The purpose for which the copied material will be used and the manner in which it will be used. • Your name, title, company or organization name, telephone number, fax number, e-mail address and mailing address. Please send all requests for permission to: Attention Communications Department International Republican Institute 1225 Eye Street NW, Suite 700 Washington, DC 20005 [email protected] Disclaimer: This publication was made possible through the support provided by the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). The opinions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily
  • THE UKRAINIAN WEEKLY 2000 Volume I (1933-1969)

    THE UKRAINIAN WEEKLY 2000 Volume I (1933-1969)

    THE UKRAINIAN WEEK THE UKRAINIAN WEEK L L Y 2000 Y 2000 THETHE 2000UKRAINIANUKRAINIAN WEEKWEEKLLYY The most significant news stories and commentaries published in The Ukrainian Weekly. Volume I 1933-1969 Volume I (1933-1969) Volume THE 2000UKRAINIAN WEEKLY The most significant news stories and commentaries published in The Ukrainian Weekly. Volume I 1933-1969 The Ukrainian Weekly Parsippany, N.J. © 2000 The Ukrainian Weekly 2200 Route 10 P.O. Box 280 Parsippany, N.J. 07054 Compiled and written by the editors of The Ukrainian Weekly Cover design/layout: Serge Polishchuk Typesetting: Awilda Rolon Administration: Walter Honcharyk Contents Introduction .................................................................................................................................................................... 10 The 1930s: A neophyte newspaper and the Great Famine ................................................. 12 Our Stand ......................................................................................................................................................... 14 Famine Under Soviets ............................................................................................................................ 15 Present Conditions In Ukraine .......................................................................................................... 17 Germany Press Reports Great Famine In Ukraine Under Soviets ....................... 17 Famine – Deliberate Soviet Weapon ..........................................................................................
  • The Pre-Election Environment in Georgia

    The Pre-Election Environment in Georgia

    The Pre-Election Environment in Georgia A report by the International Republican Institute’s Long-Term Election Observation Mission The Pre-Election Environment in Georgia August 1 – August 25, 2016 International Republican Institute www.IRI.org | @IRIGlobal © 2014 All Rights Reserved The Pre-Election Environment in Georgia Copyright © 2016 International Republican Institute. All rights reserved. Permission Statement: No part of this work may be reproduced in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system without the written permission of the International Republican Institute. Requests for permission should include the following information: • The title of the document for which permission to copy material is desired. • A description of the material for which permission to copy is desired. • The purpose for which the copied material will be used and the manner in which it will be used. • Your name, title, company or organization name, telephone number, fax number, e-mail address and mailing address. Please send all requests for permission to: Attention Communications Department International Republican Institute 1225 Eye Street NW, Suite 700 Washington, DC 20005 [email protected] Disclaimer: This publication was made possible through the support provided by the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). The opinions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID. Introduction On August 1, as part of its long-term election observation mission (LTO) to Georgia, the International Republican Institute (IRI) deployed seven long-term observation teams to Ajara, Samegrelo, Imereti, Samtskhe-Javakheti, Kvemo-Kartli and Kakheti.1 This report describes the findings of IRI’s long-term observation efforts from August 1 – August 25, and provides recommendations designed to increase public confidence in the electoral process.

  • Policy P Aper Series

    saqarTvelos strategiisa da saerTaSoriso urTierTobebis kvlevis fondi sajaro politikis dokumentebi POLICY SERIES PAPER Mentors: Vladimer Papava Aleksandre Kvakhadze Editor: Rusudan Margishvili Technical Editor: Artem Melik-Nubarov All rights reserved and belong to Georgian Foundation for Strategic and International Studies. No part of this publication may be reproduced in any form, including electronic and mechanical, without the prior written permission of the publisher Copyright © 2020 Georgian Foundation for Strategic and International Studies ABOUT THE PROJECT The Policy Paper Series include policy briefs developed within the framework of the National Minorities in Political Processes – Engagement for a Better Future project. The papers were elaborated by the ethnic minority youth from Samtskhe-Javakheti and Kvemo Kartli for whom it was their first attempt to work on an analytical document. The papers address the challenges and solutions for the engagement of ethnic minorities in the political, economic or social life of Georgia. The project was implemented by the Rondeli Foundation with the support and active participation of the OSCE High Commissioner on National Minorities (OSCE HCNM). The project aims to increase the political and social inclusion of ethnic minorities and facilitate a healthy policy debate on the issues of national minorities among the political parties, thus overall contributing to good governance practices. Within the framework of the multi-component project, members of Tbilisi-based political party youth organizations, young people living in Samtskhe-Javakheti and Kvemo Kartli and active representatives of the local community attended various thematic seminars. The project also included thematic meetings of representatives of political parties and government agencies with the representatives of national minorities, the preparation of TV programs and organizing internships in political parties for young people representing ethnic minorities.

  • International Society for Fair Elections and Democracy Final

    International Society for Fair Elections and Democracy Final Report for the period of February 11th, 2016- March 31st, 2017 Strengthening Political and Electoral Environment for Democracy in Georgia (SPEED) USAID Cooperative Agreement No. AID-114-A-16-00002 Total budget: $ 1,385,030 I. SUMMARY On February 11th, 2016 ISFED signed the contract with the USAID on the new project: `Strengthening Political and Electoral Environment for Democracy in Georgia (SPEED)`. At the first stage of the project, in March and April, ISFED had the introductory and consultation meetings with the USAID representatives on the financial and program related issues. Taking into consideration the needs assessment of the project and feedback received from the USAID representatives, the Project Core Team (PCT) updated the project PMP and the work plan, which was submitted to the donor in May. In March-April, ISFED worked on research and study of the new electoral districts determined by the Central Election Commission (CEC)1. Within the project, ISFED selected two new staff members on the positions of the Program Manager and the Project Assistant. In May, organization started the recruitment process of Long Term observers (LTOs) for monitoring the pre-election period. In April, the PCT organized the meeting for the central office staff members, presented and discussed the new redistribution, boarders and functions of the electoral districts. On May 3-5, ISFED organized the retreat to Kakheti region. The meetings held at the retreat were attended by ten central and five regional office staff members and covered the topics related with the observation of the pre-election period.