Ganz Notes on a Wizard of Earthsea (1968) by Ursula K
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
GANZ NOTES ON A WIZARD OF EARTHSEA (1968) BY URSULA K. LE GUIN Version: 22, 26, 27, 31 January 2021; 3, 4, 6, 9, 13, 14 February 2021 QUOTES Only in silence the word, only in dark the light, only in dying life: bright the hawk's flight on the empty sky. —The Creation of Éa “This is a skill science fiction and fantasy writers are keenly aware of, because they often have a great deal of information to convey that the reader has no way of knowing unless told. If my story’s set in Chicago in 2005, I can assume that my readers have some general idea of the time and place and how things were and can fill in the picture from the barest hints. But if my story’s set on 4-Beta Draconis in 3205, my readers have no idea what to expect. The world of the story must be created and explained in the story. This is part of the particular interest and beauty of science fiction and fantasy: writer and reader collaborate in world-making. But it’s a tricky business.” [Le Guin, Ursula K.. Steering the Craft: A Twenty-First-Century Guide to Sailing the Sea of Story (p. 96). Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. Kindle Edition.] TEXTS WORTH CONSIDERING Johnson, Robert A. Owning Your Own Shadow. HarperOne. Kindle Edition.] NOTES BY RICHARD GANZ 1 ASIN : 0062507540 Publisher : HarperSanFrancisco; Illustrated edition (February 17, 1994) Language : English Paperback : 128 pages ISBN-10 : 9780062507549 ISBN-13 : 978-0062507549 Kidd, Susan Monk. When the Heart Waits: Spiritual Direction for Life’s Sacred Questions (plus). ASIN : B00JOFFNLI Publisher : HarperOne (September 20, 2016) Publication date : September 20, 2016 Language : English Print Length: 229 pages Le Guin, Ursula K.. The Language of the Night: Essays on Fantasy and Science Fiction, edited by Susan Wood (1979), and in particular the essay, “The Child and the Shadow”, pp. 59-71. THE VIDEO OF BECKY HAGELIN’S TWINS On 14 February 2021, Becky Hagelin sent the family a video of her twins in their sleep suits crawling after each other on the floor. I love the child-joy of it as one chases the other: the one trying to get away, but never wanting to get too far away … and so waiting for the other to catch up. I love the video for how it brings JOY (the presence of the Holy Spirit) into this evening’s Faber Sessions, but I also, playfully, like to use it as an image of Ged being chased by his Shadow. So, do the Share Screen feature on ZOOM and show it. TODAY’S GOSPEL Gospel - Mark 1:40–45 40 A leper came to him [and kneeling down] begged him and said, “If you wish, you can make me clean.” 41 Moved with pity, he stretched out his hand, touched him, and said to him, “I do will it. Be made clean.” 42 The leprosy left him immediately, and he was made clean. 43 Then, warning him sternly, he dismissed him at once. 44 Then he said to him, “See that you tell no one anything, but go, show yourself to the priest and offer for your NOTES BY RICHARD GANZ 2 cleansing what Moses prescribed; that will be proof for them.” 45 The man went away and began to publicize the whole matter. He spread the report abroad so that it was impossible for Jesus to enter a town openly. He remained outside in deserted places, and people kept coming to him from everywhere. 1 What exactly was it that Jesus did? We call it a miracle. But what if what Jesus is trying to teach us is what human beings are supposed to be normally, what we were to have been when we have become again what God made us to be in Paradise? Ephraim the Syrian thought profoundly about this. We became in significant degree de-humanized (i.e., we have lost access to, awareness of, our powers) when we were sent from Paradise, losing what we would now speak of as extraordinary/super-natural powers that God baked-in to human beings from the start. Jesus demonstrates what our true humanity is able to do when it has re-discovered its way to be as God made us to be. Jesus walking on the sea is another example. Why is what Jesus did here not identified as MAGIC? What is the difference between MAGIC and a MIRACLE? One of the ways I would sort this out is to say that a MIRACLE is something God chooses to do through me, when He wishes to do it, and for His usually inscrutable purposes. MAGIC is what Sparrowhawk thought a “wizard” was all about before he unleashed the/his shadow – someone able to do what he wants, whenever he wants to do it, and for his own reasons. My experience of being part of a “miracle” when working at the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center in Seattle, in the summer of 1982. WHAT IS THIS BOOK ABOUT? What a book is “about” is first and foremost the affect it has on you, the reader of it. You must be able to let the Story have you. Consider C.S. Lewis’ essay “A Meditation in a Toolshed” in which he articulates what for him will be one of the most essential insights about our power of Understanding anything: LOOKING AT the beam of light; LOOKING ALONG the beam of light – “The answer is that we must never allow the rot to begin. We must, on pain of idiocy, deny from the very outset the idea that looking at is, by its own nature, intrinsically truer or better than looking along. One must look both along and at everything. In particular cases we shall find reason for regarding the one or the other vision as inferior. Thus the inside vision of rational thinking must be truer than the outside vision which sees only movements of the grey matter; for if the outside vision 1 Catholic Daily Readings (Bellingham, WA: Faithlife, 2009). NOTES BY RICHARD GANZ 3 were the correct one all thought (including this thought itself) would be valueless, and this is self-contradictory. You cannot have a proof that no proofs matter. On the other hand, the inside vision of the savage’s dance to Nyonga may be found deceptive because we find reason to believe that crops and babies are not really affected by it. In fact, we must take each case on its merits. But we must start with no prejudice for or against either kind of looking. We do not know in advance whether the lover or the psychologist is giving the more correct account of love, or whether both accounts are equally correct in different ways, or whether both are equally wrong. We just have to find out. But the period of brow-beating has got to end.” [C. S. Lewis, God in the Dock, ed. Walter Hooper (HarperOne, 1994), “Meditation in a Toolshed”, pages 233–234. My personal version of looking at vs looking along was especially during my Theology studies. Too many of my Professors knew so much about God (looking at), but I became convinced that very few of them actually knew God (looking along). I came to understand that to receive the Holy Spirit meant to be given the power, inside of our human powers of soul, to know God from the inside … which is really the only way that God allows us to know Him. Religion goes bad, or at least become irrelevant, when it has lost its ability, or lost interest in, showing its followers how to know God from the inside – to know God, not just to know about God. And thus my decades long search to understand what Fr. Gordon Moreland, SJ had taught me as a Novice: God can only be truly know as Subject, not as Object. Ursula K. Le Guin, “The Child and the Shadow” (1975) – “The great fantasies, myths, and tales are indeed like dreams: they speak from the unconscious to the unconscious, in the language of the unconscious - symbol and archetype. Though they use words, they work the way music does: they short-circuit verbal reasoning, and go straight to the thoughts that lie too deep to utter.” Ursula K. Le Guin, “The Child and the Shadow” (1975) –“It also seems to me that most of the great works of fantasy are about that journey; and that fantasy is the medium best suited to a description of that journey, its perils and rewards. The events of a voyage into the unconscious are not describable in the language of rational daily life: only the symbolic language of the deeper psyche will fit them without trivializing them.” ASKING Before we continue, I want to ask those attending: “What do you think that the book is about?” NOTES BY RICHARD GANZ 4 WONDERING ABOUT THE TITLE Why is this first of the Earthsea novels called A Wizard of Earthsea? Asking this, reminds us of the importance of NAMING in this and all of the novels of Earthsea. “To know the true name of a thing.” For example: (1) It does not say The but A Wizard…, even though we are pretty sure that the book is about one particular Wizard; (2) It is arguable that the most important part of this story happens before Sparrowhawk/Ged earns his wizard’s staff, because finding a way to reconcile what he unleashed into the world, being pursued and then pursuing, and then what came to pass, is what will define essentially what Ged’s mastery is: self-knowledge; (3) Why does it matter, or have so prominent a notice, where Ged learns to become a wizard; i.e.