Burt Lake Watershed Management Plan

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Burt Lake Watershed Management Plan Burt Lake, Little Carp River, Hasler Creek, Unnamed Creek of West Burt Lake Road, White Goose Creek, Douglas Lake, Lancaster Lake, Lancaster Creek, Larks Lake, Munro Lake, Burt Lake Watershed Certon Creek, Cold Creek, Cope Creek, Bessey Creek, Beaver Management Plan Tail Creek, Brush Creek, Maple River, East Branch Maple River, West Branch Maple River, Van Creek, Arnott Lake, Sherett Lake, Vincent Lake, Crooked Lake, Mud Lake (Emmet County), Pickerel Lake (Emmet County), Round Lake, Spring Lake, Iduna Creek, Weber Lake, Cedar Creek, Crooked River, McPhee Creek, Minnehaha Creek, West Branch Minnehaha Creek, Mud Creek, Oden Creek, Sanford Creek, Silver Creek, Silver Creek Pond, Berry Creek, Deer Creek, Allen Creek, Blackjack Creek, Bradley Creek, Barhite Lake, Berry Lake, Beebe Creek, Black Lake, Bows Lake, Fitzek Lake, Fleming Lake, Fulmer Lake, Heart Lake, Hoffman Lake, Kidney Lake, Clifford Lake, Lake Eighteen, Olund Lake, Reardon Lake, Standard Lake, Storey Lake, Woodin Lake, Mud Lake (Cheboygan County), Huffman Lake, Protecting the Water Resources of the Pickerel Lake (Otsego County), Silver Lake, Mossback Creek, Marl Burt Lake Watershed Creek, Pickerel Creek, Stewart Creek, Thumb Lake, Wildwood Lake, Club Stream, Sturgeon December 2016 River, West Branch 1 Sturgeon River Acknowledgements Thank you to Julia Kirkwood and Greg Goudy of the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality Nonpoint Source Program for their assistance with development of the Burt Lake Watershed Management Plan. Thank you to the Burt Lake Watershed Advisory Committee for their dedication to protecting the Burt Lake Watershed through watershed management planning and implementation. Financial assistance for this project was provided, in part, by a Michigan Department of Environmental Quality’s Nonpoint Source Program grant under Section 319 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (Clean Water Act). Funding for the program is provided to the MDEQ from the United States Environmental Protection Agency for the implementation of nine-element watershed management plans. The Burt Lake Watershed Management Plan was prepared by: Tip of the Mitt Watershed Council 426 Bay St. Petoskey, MI 49770 www.watershedcouncil.org December 2016 2 Table of Contents Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................. 2 Table of Contents...................................................................................................................... 3 Figures ......................................................................................................................................... 6 Tables .......................................................................................................................................... 9 Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 11 The Burt Lake Watershed Advisory Committee .............................................................. 12 CHAPTER 1 ................................................................................................................................... 14 The Burt Lake Watershed ....................................................................................................... 14 Burt Lake Direct Drainage ......................................................................................................... 68 Burt Lake ............................................................................................................................... 69 Maple River Watershed ............................................................................................................. 75 Maple River .......................................................................................................................... 77 Munro Lake .......................................................................................................................... 82 Douglas Lake ....................................................................................................................... 83 Crooked River Watershed ......................................................................................................... 89 Spring and Mud Lakes ........................................................................................................ 93 Round Lake .......................................................................................................................... 93 Crooked and Pickerel Lakes .............................................................................................. 97 Crooked River .................................................................................................................... 101 Sturgeon River Watershed ....................................................................................................... 103 Sturgeon River .................................................................................................................... 109 Huffman Lake ..................................................................................................................... 110 Lance Lake ......................................................................................................................... 112 Wildwood Lake .................................................................................................................. 115 Silver Lake ........................................................................................................................... 118 CHAPTER 2 ................................................................................................................................. 119 State Water Quality Standards, Designated Uses and Desired Uses ............................. 119 State Water Quality Standards ........................................................................................ 120 Designated Uses ................................................................................................................ 122 CHAPTER 3 ................................................................................................................................. 125 Water Quality of the Burt Lake Watershed ........................................................................ 125 3 Water Quality of the Burt Lake Direct Drainage ........................................................... 130 Water Quality of the Maple River Watershed ............................................................... 134 Water Quality of the Crooked River Watershed ........................................................... 140 Water Quality of the Sturgeon River Watershed ........................................................... 145 CHAPTER 4 ................................................................................................................................. 151 Resource Inventories of the Burt Lake Watershed ........................................................... 151 Land Cover ........................................................................................................................ 152 Stormwater ......................................................................................................................... 155 Shoreline Surveys ............................................................................................................... 161 Road/Stream Crossing Inventories .................................................................................. 189 Agricultural Inventory ........................................................................................................ 197 Forestry Inventory .............................................................................................................. 206 Streambank Erosion Surveys ............................................................................................ 217 Tributary Monitoring .......................................................................................................... 232 CHAPTER 5 ................................................................................................................................. 237 Water Quality Threats ........................................................................................................... 237 Chapter 6................................................................................................................................... 242 Critical and Priority Areas ..................................................................................................... 242 Critical Areas ...................................................................................................................... 243 Priority Areas ....................................................................................................................... 245 Priority Parcel Analysis ....................................................................................................... 247 CHAPTER 7 ................................................................................................................................. 254 Goals and Objectives .......................................................................................................... 254 CHAPTER 8 ................................................................................................................................. 258 Implementation Steps .........................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Burt Lake Shoreline Survey 2009
    Burt Lake Shoreline Survey 2009 By Tip of the Mitt Watershed Council Report written by: Kevin L. Cronk Monitoring and Research Coordinator Table of Contents Page List of Tables and Figures iii Summary 1 Introduction 2 Background 2 Shoreline development impacts 3 Study Area 7 Methods 13 Field Survey Parameters 13 Data processing 17 Results 18 Discussion 21 Recommendations 26 Literature and Data Referenced 29 ii List of Tables Page Table 1. Burt Lake watershed land-cover statistics 9 Table 2. Categorization system for Cladophora density 15 Table 3. Cladophora density statistics 18 Table 4. Septic Leachate Detector (SLD) results 18 Table 5. Greenbelt score statistics 19 Table 6. Shoreline alteration statistics 19 Table 7. Cladophora density comparisons: 2001 to 2009 21 Table 8. Greenbelt rating comparisons: 2001 to 2009 21 Table 9. Shore survey statistics from Northern Michigan lakes 22 List of Figures Page Figure 1. Map of Burt Lake, Features and Depths 8 Figure 2. Map of the Burt Lake watershed 10 Figure 3. Chart of phosphorus data from Burt Lake 12 Figure 4. Chart of trophic status index data from Burt Lake 12 iii SUMMARY During the summer of 2009, the Tip of the Mitt Watershed Council conducted a comprehensive shoreline survey on Burt Lake that was sponsored by the Burt Lake Preservation Association. Watershed Council staff surveyed the entire shoreline in June and July to document conditions that potentially impact water quality. The parameters surveyed include: algae as a bio-indicator of nutrient pollution, greenbelt status, shoreline erosion, shoreline alterations, nearshore substrate types, and stream inlets and outlets.
    [Show full text]
  • Approved Unsigned DNR NRC Memos January
    STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES LANSING GRETCHEN WHITMER DANIEL EICHINGER GOVERNOR DIRECTOR SUBMITTED: November 12, 2019 RESUBMITTED: December 16, 2019 MEMORANDUM TO THE DIRECTOR Information: Natural Resources Commission Subject: Parks and Recreation Division (PRD) Management of State Forest Campgrounds Land Use Order of the Director Amendment No. 1 of 2020 Authority: The Natural Resources and Environmental Protection Act, 1994 PA 451, authorizes the Director to issue orders to implement land use rules. Discussion and Background: Currently, existing state forest campgrounds are located on land administered by the Forest Resources Division (FRD), but PRD performs the day-to-day management and operation of the campgrounds. The intent of this order is to designate existing state forest campgrounds as “state parks” within the meaning of MCL 324.74101(g) to formally recognize PRD’s current land administration and management functions. In 2012, the Department of Natural Resources (Department) transferred forest recreation activities to PRD, including management responsibilities of the state forest campgrounds identified below. An increased expectation for these lands has led to a desire to formalize the transfer of administration and management. Additionally, since park improvement funds are restricted for use only to support designated state parks and recreation areas, this designation will enable funds to be used to support the areas defined in this order. To facilitate this conveyance, the lands identified below, consisting of and not exceeding a 50-foot perimeter around the most outer edge of the campsites, are to be dedicated within the meaning of MCL 324.74101(g) with administration and management to be formally undertaken by PRD.
    [Show full text]
  • Burt Lake Watershed Permit Guide
    Attention All Burt Lake Watershed Property Owners: If you have plans to build, drill or fill there are some things you should know before you begin. Many home improvement activities are regulated by local, state or federal agencies. As a result, a review process and permits are often required before work begins. This process can be confusing for the homeowner seeking answers. To help you navigate through the right channels, we offer this resource to set you on your course toward achieving your property goals. If any of the following activities are included in your future plans for your property in Cheboygan or Emmet County, learn now what steps you will need to take. As a Northern Michigan resident, you are surrounded by our beautiful natural resources every day. Preserving Regulated activities on private the character and quality of the land and water is very likely important to you. Regulations are intended property include: to protect water resources, as well as neighboring • Building a new home properties. Activities inconsistent with permitted uses threaten the immediate and future health of these • Modifying an existing home (expanding resources. By observing standards established in local or building an addition) ordinances, you can do your part to protect the waters • Installing a new septic system of Burt Lake and the Burt Lake Watershed. • Repairing an existing septic system A healthy watershed depends on sound and responsible • Excavating earth within 500 feet of a lake or land use. The presence of pollutants anywhere within stream or if an earth change will disturb an acre the Watershed can easily end up in Burt Lake and its or more of land (regardless of distance to lake connecting waters.
    [Show full text]
  • Bearinger Township Presque Isle County
    Bearinger Township Presque Isle County Adopted: Planning Commission: August 14, 2007 Township Board: September 10, 2007 Prepared by: Bearinger Township Planning Commission Assisted by: Northeast Michigan Council of Governments BEARINGER TOWNSHIP MASTER PLAN Bearinger Township Presque Isle County, Michigan Township Board Richard Mowers, Supervisor Irene Seeyle, Clerk Nancy Mowers, Treasure Margaret A. Pilaczynski, Trustee Ronald J. Snider, Trustee Prepared by: Bearinger Township Planning Commission Tom Harkleroad, Chair Ronald Dulak, Vice-Chair Beverly Rossetto, Secretary Robert Sido Ronald Snider Assisted by: Northeast Michigan Council of Governments 121 East Mitchell Street P. O. Box 457 Gaylord, Michigan 49734 www.nemcog.org Adopted: Planning Commission: August 14, 2007 Township Board: September 10, 2007 This project was funded in part under the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972, as amended, Office of Ocean and Coastal Resource Management, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce and the Michigan Coastal Management Program, Michigan Department of Environmental Quality. Additional funding support was provided by the City of Alpena. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Planning Staff from NEMCOG: Richard Deuell, AICP BEARINGER TOWNSHIP MASTER PLAN Table of Contents CHAPTER 1 - INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................... 1-1 CHAPTER 2 -SOCIO ECONOMIC PROFILE............................................................................2-1 CHAPTER 3 - COMMUNITY
    [Show full text]
  • Resilient Shorelines Protect Northern Michigan Lakes
    Resilient Shorelines Protect Northern Michigan Lakes Northern Michigan is home to thousands of acres of inland lakes Enhancing shoreline resiliency is key to countering both human and hundreds of miles of shoreline, but the connection between and natural influences. For natural shorelines that have a healthy healthy lakes and shorelines is oftentimes overlooked. A lake cannot greenbelt of trees, shrubs, grasses, herbaceous plants, and emergent support a robust fishery, nor can it have good water quality without plants like bulrushes growing in nearshore areas, the best practice a healthy shoreline. A healthy shoreline is a resilient shoreline: one is to retain as much vegetation as possible. These plants are critical that responds to change yet retains its functions over time, and pro- to stabilizing shorelines. tects the lake it borders without impacting the lake’s ecosystem. Restoring resiliency to shorelines that have been altered requires Shorelines serve as a critical interface between land and water. They more effort, but will provide significant benefits to the lake in the protect their lakes every day by filtering runoff and providing crit- long run. Consider taking the following actions as they apply: ical habitat for hundreds of shoreline-dependent amphibians, birds, fish, and more. When shorelines are compromised, so are the func- • Where shoreline plants have been removed, plant native tions that serve to protect our lakes. species adapted to local conditions. They will hold soils in place and provide important habitat. All shorelines are in a state of constant change. Whether the change is natural, influenced by human activities, or both, is an important • Refrain from introducing or replenishing sand to create an distinction.
    [Show full text]
  • Download the Inland Waterway and Straits Area Water Trails Plan
    Water Trail Plan Inland Waterway and Straits Area Cheboygan and Emmet Counties Funded by: Office of Ocean and Coastal Resource Management, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce and the Michigan Coastal Management Program, Michigan Department of Environmental Quality with support from the Emmet County, Cheboygan County, Mackinaw City, and volunteers. June 2014 1 Inland Waterway and Straits Area Water Trail Plan Introduction The Inland Waterway is a 40 mile long historic water route that connects Lake Huron by way of Cheboygan, Indian River, Alanson, and Conway and with series of long portages at the headwaters to Petoskey State Park and Lake Michigan. A coastal route, part of the Huron Shores Blueways, connects the City of Cheboygan to Mackinaw City and the Straits of Mackinac. Like the interior water trails, the coastal waters have been used for transportation for thousands of years. The Inland Waterway has long been marketed as the motor boating paradise. Sitting along the banks of the Indian River on a summer afternoon and watching a steady stream of motored craft pass by, attests to the marketing success. There has never been a multi-community effort to organize and promote a paddle trail. Human-powered quiet water sports are among the fastest growing outdoor recreation activities. Combined with other active sports facilities such as the North Central State Trail, North Western State Trail and the North Country Trail, the water trail will bring visitors to the area, add to the quality of life for residents and enhance the rural-recreation sense of place. Furthermore, development of the water trail represents a regional, multi organization effort and will support economic development in the region of the state dependent upon recreational visitors.
    [Show full text]
  • Depth Information Not Available for Lakes Marked with an Asterisk (*)
    DEPTH INFORMATION NOT AVAILABLE FOR LAKES MARKED WITH AN ASTERISK (*) LAKE NAME COUNTY COUNTY COUNTY COUNTY GL Great Lakes Great Lakes GL Lake Erie Great Lakes GL Lake Erie (Port of Toledo) Great Lakes GL Lake Erie (Western Basin) Great Lakes GL Lake Huron Great Lakes GL Lake Huron (w West Lake Erie) Great Lakes GL Lake Michigan (Northeast) Great Lakes GL Lake Michigan (South) Great Lakes GL Lake Michigan (w Lake Erie and Lake Huron) Great Lakes GL Lake Ontario Great Lakes GL Lake Ontario (Rochester Area) Great Lakes GL Lake Ontario (Stoney Pt to Wolf Island) Great Lakes GL Lake Superior Great Lakes GL Lake Superior (w Lake Michigan and Lake Huron) Great Lakes AL Baldwin County Coast Baldwin AL Cedar Creek Reservoir Franklin AL Dog River * Mobile AL Goat Rock Lake * Chambers Lee Harris (GA) Troup (GA) AL Guntersville Lake Marshall Jackson AL Highland Lake * Blount AL Inland Lake * Blount AL Lake Gantt * Covington AL Lake Jackson * Covington Walton (FL) AL Lake Jordan Elmore Coosa Chilton AL Lake Martin Coosa Elmore Tallapoosa AL Lake Mitchell Chilton Coosa AL Lake Tuscaloosa Tuscaloosa AL Lake Wedowee Clay Cleburne Randolph AL Lay Lake Shelby Talladega Chilton Coosa AL Lay Lake and Mitchell Lake Shelby Talladega Chilton Coosa AL Lewis Smith Lake Cullman Walker Winston AL Lewis Smith Lake * Cullman Walker Winston AL Little Lagoon Baldwin AL Logan Martin Lake Saint Clair Talladega AL Mobile Bay Baldwin Mobile Washington AL Mud Creek * Franklin AL Ono Island Baldwin AL Open Pond * Covington AL Orange Beach East Baldwin AL Oyster Bay Baldwin AL Perdido Bay Baldwin Escambia (FL) AL Pickwick Lake Colbert Lauderdale Tishomingo (MS) Hardin (TN) AL Shelby Lakes Baldwin AL Walter F.
    [Show full text]
  • Maple River Dam EA
    ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT (EA) for MAPLE RIVER DAM REMOVAL AND ROAD CROSSING IMPROVEMENTS – MAPLE RIVER, PELLSTON, MI PREPARED FOR: PREPARED BY: January 9, 2018 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT This Environmental Assessment was prepared under grants received by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Project Authority ........................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Project Background and Location ................................................................................................. 1 1.3 Site Description ............................................................................................................................. 2 1.3.1 Dam and Embankments ........................................................................................................ 2 1.3.2 Spillway ................................................................................................................................. 3 1.3.3 Powerhouse .......................................................................................................................... 3 1.3.4 Reservoir ............................................................................................................................... 4 1.3.5 Woodland Road Crossing .....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Watersheds of Northeast Michigan
    The Watersheds of Northeast Michigan What is a Watershed? Did you know that everywhere you are, you’re within a watershed? A watershed is an area of land that contains a common set of streams, rivers and lakes that all drain into a larger waterbody. Watershed boundaries follow natural features of the landscape, such as a ridgeline or a height-of-land (see diagram at right). Watersheds include both the water features within the area, as well as the land surrounding those water bodies. As a result of the connected nature of a watershed, all activities on the land and water can affect the condition of the larger watershed. A watershed can be divided into progressively smaller watersheds, which are often referred to as subswatersheds. For example, the Klacking Creek Watershed is one of many subwatersheds that can be identified within the larger Rifle River Watershed. Likewise, the Rifle River Watershed itself is part of the larger Lake Huron Watershed. Watershed diagram: www.upperdesplainsriver.org Huron Pines is a nonprofit 501(c)(3) organization and an equal opportunity provider. Our dynamic staff of ecologists, geographers, biologists and environmental educators think big and act quickly to ensure that Northeast Michigan’s watersheds and wild places will stay healthy and resilient for future generations. Located right in the center of the Great Lakes system, we have the unique privilege and responsibility to protect our treasured lands teeming with wildlife, and to sustain the world’s most important source of fresh water. Learn more at
    [Show full text]
  • I II Mublic V
    EMMET COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING THURSDAY MAY 2,2019 7:30 PM EMMET COUNTY BUILDING COMMISSIONER'S ROOM 2OO DIVISION ST PETOSI(EY,Mr 49770 AGENDA I Call to Order and Attendance II Minutes of April 4,2019 UI Cases CASBS FROM PREVIOUS MEETINGS 1. PPUDF 18-02 Crooked Lake Yacht Club, Planned Unit Development Amendment,3704 Oden Rd, Section 18, Littlefield Township - AMENDMENT OF CONDITIONS AFTER LEGAL REVIEW 2. PSPR 18-016 David Firman, SITE PLAN REVIEW - Amendment,3529 Howard Rd, Section 20, Bear Creek Township 3. PStlPl9-003 David Coveyou/Coveyou Scenic Farm, SPECIAL USE PERMIT - Accessory Farm Uses,4160 US 131 Hwy, Sections 19 &30, BearCreekTownship NEW CASES 4. PSUPf 9-005 Ernest & Mike Spierling, SPECIAL USE PERMIT - Level III Resource Mining Operation, 6626 N US 3l Hwy, Section 35, Carp Lake Township 5. PPUD19-002 David McBride, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT - Amendment,7320 M-68 Hwy, Section I 1, Littlefield Township 6. PSPR19-001 Kristin & Phillip Schaner, SITE PLAN REVIEW - Amendment - Hotel, Motel, Motor Inn, 1256 Pirates Way, Section34,Bear Creek Township 7. PPuDl9-003 Ralph Dubey for Wolverine Interstate Properties, PUD-1 - Amendment, Professional Offices and other business uses, 347 Creekside Drive, Section 4, Bear Creek Township 8. PPTEXT19-O1 Emmet County Planning Commission, Text Amendment, Section 19.01, Footnote J; Front & Rear Yard setback 9. PPTEXT19-O2 Emmet County Planning Commission, Text Amendment, Sections 4.01, 5.01, 6.1, 7.01, 8.01 & 26.51; Wineries 10. PPTEXT19-03 Emmet County Planning Commission, Text Amendment, Section 22.07, Signs 11. PPTEXT19-O4 Emmet County Planning Commission, Text Amendment, Section 22.06, Outdoor Lighting 12.
    [Show full text]
  • Inland Waterway
    About the Navigating North Northern Michigan’s scenic Inland Waterway he closest communities to the Inland Waterway Tinclude Petoskey, Harbor Springs, Indian River and INLAND he first known improvement to the Inland Water- Cheboygan. Highways into the area include I-75 and Tway occurred in 1874 - the clearing of a sandbar at U.S. 31. The Web site, www.fishweb.com, has extensive the head of the Indian River. Prior to this time, the information about each of the waters along the route, lodging, boat service and rentals, boat ramps and related WATERWAY waterway was being used by Native Americans in canoes as a means of travel across the Northern end of the information. Lower Peninsula. During the lumbering era, the route was used extensively for transportation of products and people to the many resorts in the area. Since then, the 38 miles of connected lakes Inland Waterway has become one of the more popular and rivers through Emmet boat trips to be found anywhere in the country. and Cheboygan Counties Navigation notes: From Crooked Lake in Conway (Em- met County), the navigable waters flow toward Lake Hu- ron. Passing from lake to river, the water drops 18 inches at the Crooked River Lock. Through Alanson, past its quaint swing bridge, and north into Hay Lake (a marsh two miles long), the waters continue to flow northeast- erly. At Devil’s Elbow and at the Oxbow, the Crooked For information about Northern River lives up to its name. Here, on the forested banks, Front Cover 4” deer browse, herons gather and autumn creates a display Michigan, complimentary maps and more: of irresistible color.
    [Show full text]
  • Crooked Lake: Emmet County
    Michigan Dept. of Natural Resources Status of the Fishery Resource Report Page 1 Crooked Lake Emmet County, T35N, R04W, many sections Cheboygan River watershed, 2019 Neal A. Godby Jr., Senior Fisheries Biologist Environment Crooked Lake is a 2,352-acre lake in Emmet County and is part of the Inland Waterway in the Cheboygan River watershed (Figure 1). Tributaries to the lake include Minnehaha Creek and Pickerel Lake Channel (outlet from Pickerel Lake), Mud Creek (outflow from Round Lake), and Oden Creek. The outlet is the Crooked River, which flows downstream into Burt Lake. Crooked Lake has a maximum depth of 68 feet and thermally stratifies in the summer with a thermocline at 28-34 feet in depth (Figure 2, Table 1). There is a hard-surfaced boat ramp access in the northwest corner of the lake off US-31 highway. History Fisheries management in Crooked Lake dates back to 1923, when 10,000 Rainbow Trout were stocked in the lake. Rainbow Trout and Lake Trout were stocked periodically through the 1920s, along with Yellow Perch for two years. The 1930s brought an expanded stocking program to Crooked Lake, with Smallmouth Bass, Largemouth Bass, Walleye, Yellow Perch, Bluegill, Northern Pike, and Rock Bass stocked in addition to the Rainbow Trout and Lake Trout during that decade. The same nine species were stocked at various levels and frequency during the 1940s, but Walleye and Yellow Perch were the most consistently stocked species during that time period. The only stocking to take place in Crooked Lake in the 1950s and 1960s was in 1966, when 3,333 adult Coho Salmon were stocked.
    [Show full text]