DOCSLIB.ORG

Frames and Their Consequences

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Frames and Their Consequences Frames and their Consequences For Rural Issues Part Two How Americans Think About Rural Issues The Research Base • 30 one-on-one interviews 10 each urban, suburban, rural Maryland, Colorado, Illinois • 7 focus groups New Hampshire (3), Arkansas (2), New Mexico (2) mixed gender, ethnicity/race Urban/suburban + rural (2 hour drive) community influentials screen • Builds on extensive prior research from Kellogg Focus groups, survey research, content analysis, etc. What Are the Pictures in Americans’ Heads When they think about rural America? Depends on Where You Sit • Q: How do people in rural areas make a living? • A: Beats the heck out of me. If they don’t farm, I have no idea. [urban IL man] vs. I think one of the problems in rural areas is that there aren’t enough white collar jobs. I’m speaking for this particular area. It’s a very blue collar town, and I would like to see this town, anyway, develop some white collar jobs, some high-tech jobs. [rural IL woman] When In Doubt, Default Visible Issue Attitude Implication 1 Rural Utopia Implication 2 Implication 3 Implication 4 Rural Dystopia Implication 5 Implication 6 Implication 7 Rural Systems Implication 8 Implication 9 What Frames Are Available from Media The Dominant Frame • Rural = areas facing urbanization and trying to preserve their rural past or atmosphere (encroachment) • Change = loss • Rural residents oppose it • “TV news just wasn’t interested in civic life in rural America.” • Change = inevitable • Future = negative, fearful • Less about agriculture or farming than open space • 1/12 = quaint and charming • 1/12 = economically challenged, socially marginalized • Farm Bill covered as “politics as usual” • Largely episodic, little contextualization or issues orientation • Nice place to visit Center for Media and Public Affairs for W. K. Kellogg Foundation, content analysis of 337 rural stories, national TV, magazine and print Rural Dystopia Another Available Default Frame • Poverty, hardship, “I’ve done some traveling in hopelessness the South and there the real poverty is devastating. I mean • Backward people live in shacks I’ve • Dysfunctional driven past that looks like if you sneezed it would fall • Shiftless, trashy, down. Not quite as bad a place as like India, inbred, drunk but…”[urban CO male] • The Other Rural Systems: Connect the Dots • Explains disconnection, decline, lack of a reliable economic base • Shows cause and effect • Connects rural to rest of America – both physically and same issues • Gets civic culture and empowerment into picture • Wal-Mart, not Mayberry or Dogpatch Systems Thinking • Big pictures not snapshots • Interconnections between people in cities and country • No quaintness • Lack of facilities and services affecting many people • Situations not people Rural Utopia • Life is simple • Poverty is a virtue • Encroachment is the main threat • We help each other • They chose this lifestyle Life is Simple I'm thinking in a rural neighborhood, life is much simpler… [It’s not about] the latest color of eyeshadow that came out, which is what a city need is, or, in suburbia it's that wine that you need for dinner. I mean, not that not that people in rural neighborhoods are light-years behind anybody else, I mean, but there's probably a smaller selection, so their needs are probably more basic… I'm not saying that as a put-down, I think that's something people need to revert back to. I'm all for it. You know? Eliminate all the 20 different products of one thing, you know, we don't need it. [suburban IL woman] Consequences of the Rural Utopia Frame: Poverty Is Not A Rural Problem Q: So when you think about poverty in America, would you associate that more with cities or with the country? A: I think the cities. I think I hear more about it in the cities, the large cities. Although I take stuff to the mission down here [in a small Colorado town] and I know there’s plenty of poor people down there…I mean the inner city, that’s where to me, I think you have more poverty. [rural CO woman] Well, I’d rather be poor in the country than I would in the city. I feel very sorry for people that have very bad incomes and live in the city. I really don’t know what, how they manage. Whereas in the country, you can just go outside and smell the grass and..I really don’t have much feeling of how they cope with it. I feel terribly sorry for them and I think it’s very sad. [rural CO woman] Q: Do you think there tends to be more poverty in rural parts of the country or more in the cities? A: I think more in the cities, like out here [in suburban Colorado], I don’;t really see many homeless people, but like in the city, there’s tons of them. Q: Okay. But in rural areas you figure people probably aren’t so poor? A: Or they go to the city. I don’t know. Like they might be struggling, but I mean they’re not like to the verge of poverty, I guess. [suburban CO woman] Consequences of the Rural Utopia Frame: Poverty Is Not A Rural Problem Rural people Urban people • Own land • Are dispossessed • Work hard •Are lazy • Self sufficient • Hand out • Ennobling • Degrading Consequences of the Rural Utopia Frame: No Role for Government Rural Urban • Natural • Man made •Simple • Complex • Backward •Progress •No stress •Stress • Get away from it all • Strive, achieve • Village • Isolated individuals • Government would • Government tries to spoil it fix it Consequences of the Rural Utopia Frame: Encroachment as the Main Threat • Progress is inevitable • Save the Family Farm = Save the Whales • Precious resources to be mined till gone vs. disrupted systems • Leads to Museum Stance and tourists in the rural landscape We Help Each Other A Rural Code of Ethics • Do whatever you can for yourself • When things get tough, sacrifice and do with less • When necessary, help friends, family and neighbors • Only truly dysfunctional people would need outside help • Intervention is not respectful They Chose This Lifestyle “I don’t think farmers are being exploited, because it’s a choice. They’ve chosen to do that as where their passion is or how they want to live.” [suburban IL man] If you don’t like being the country, why don’t you go somewhere else? Consequences of the Frames Foreground Conclusion • Simplicity • Don’t spoil it • Self-sufficiency • Don’t interfere • Choice •Move • Saving/preserving • Museum mindset • (Invisible) poverty • The way things are supposed to be Speculative Reframes from Past Research • Rural areas are places of innovation. • Rural areas are places of history and culture. • Rural areas are places of diversity. • Rural areas are an untapped asset. • What are the consequences of these frames from FW elicitations? • What are the consequences of these frames from FW focus groups? Rural areas are places of innovation. • More ingenious than high-tech • Work with what you’ve got (self- sufficiency) • Doesn’t automatically set up education, training, jobs • Needs work to prevent default Rural areas are places of history and culture. • Already think that • Negates Rural Dystopia • Sets up Rural Utopia • Antiquated forms • Modern progress is inevitable • Save the last best space/museums mindset Rural areas are places of diversity. • Diversity of race and ethnicity not routinely perceived • May connect to crime frame, if asserted • Intra-rural diversity: do you have indoor plumbing? • Uniqueness of regional crafts does little to motivate policies • Civic culture in rural America not visible Rural areas are untapped assets. • Offers the public a compelling vision of what stronger rural communities would look like in the contemporary context • Foregrounds new successful small businesses on Main Street • Explains the systems at work: agribusiness, Wal-Mart • Connects rural America to urban and suburban America Refining the Reframes Results from the Focus Groups Structure of Focus Groups • Collaging symbols (dominant frames) • Probe for past speculative reframes • Problems discussion • Solutions, responsibility probe • Vision of future • Policies discussion (importance for rural areas, nation, future) • 6 frames: 2 dominant frames plus 4 new speculative reframes as news articles • Revisit policies • What are rural issues/areas about? Top of Mind Issues • Economy • Education • Opportunity (to get out) • Farm consolidation • Transportation • Health care • All problems, no solutions • Responsibility is on rural residents to fix these problems Reactions to Inserted Issues • Economic development important, robust conversation, must be done with respect and participation of rural residents • Internet connections a no-brainer • Helping farmers switch to organic farming is about health, not economics • Living wages are about migrant workers • Child care is not a problem (farm frame) Six Focus Group Reframes 1. In the Path of Progress: Preserving Yorkville (dominant frame of museum mindset/inevitability) 2. Rural Poverty (dominant frame of problem/deficits) 3. Innovation in the Heartland (innovation/ingenuity, diversity, help from outside) 4. We are All Connected – Boundaries Blend Between Rural and Urban Areas (systems) 5. Outside Forces Breaking the Small Town Economy (cause and effect) 6. Restoring Main Street (vitality, cause and effect) In the Path of Progress: Preserving Yorkville Like small towns everywhere, Yorkville • Familiar story/script is struggling with how to adjust to progress. People who live in the area • People in rural areas have mixed views on the new housing developments sprouting up. “It’s some conflicted over future of the greatest land in the world,k and it’s gone forever..We’ll look just like • Progress is inevitable every other shopping mall in America,” says Frank Ahrens. “There is going to • Focuses attention on be growth. We need to try to make it happen the way we want it to, a rural as place not people balanced approach,” says city administrator.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Poverty, Rurality, and Termination of Parental Rights
    Missouri Law Review Volume 77 Issue 1 Winter 2012 Article 6 Winter 2012 Judging Parents, Judging Place: Poverty, Rurality, and Termination of Parental Rights Janet L. Wallace Lisa R. Pruitt Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.missouri.edu/mlr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Janet L. Wallace and Lisa R. Pruitt, Judging Parents, Judging Place: Poverty, Rurality, and Termination of Parental Rights, 77 MO. L. REV. (2012) Available at: https://scholarship.law.missouri.edu/mlr/vol77/iss1/6 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at University of Missouri School of Law Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Missouri Law Review by an authorized editor of University of Missouri School of Law Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Wallace and Pruitt: Wallace: Judging Parents, Judging Place Judging Parents, Judging Place: Poverty, Rurality, and Termination of Parental Rights Janet L. Wallace* Lisa R. Pruitt** ABSTRACT Parents arejudged constantly, by fellow parents and by wider society. But the consequences ofjudgingparents may extend beyond community repu- tation and social status. One of the harshest potential consequences is the state's termination ofparentalrights. In such legal contexts, the state assess- es parents' merits as parents in relation to a wide array of their characteris- tics, decisions and actions, including where the parents live. Among those parents judged harshly in relation to geography are im- poverishedparents who live in ruralplaces. We argue that such judgments are unjust becausepoor ruralparents often do not have ready access to state support in the form of programs that would permit them to be better parents.
    [Show full text]
  • 14E PLENARY SESSION
    The Congress of Local and Regional Authorities Chamber of Regions 14th PLENARY SESSION CPR(14)5REP 17 April 2007 Ensuring territorial continuity of social services in rural regions Stefan Berger, Germany, (R, EPP/CD) Explanatory Memorandum Committee on Social Cohesion Summary: Europe’s rural areas may face higher levels of social exclusion and deprivation than their urban counterparts due to a number of factors (ageing population, strained transport systems, diminishing supply of trained professionals, difficulty of access, higher costs, single employment sector) which are often compounded by lower levels and higher costs of social service provision. Since social services are the bedrock of a cohesive society – meeting the needs of citizens with regard to employment, housing, education, social security and care – access to them should not be conditional upon living in geographically less isolated areas. In its report the Congress’ Chamber of the Regions stresses the need to ensure the sustainability of social services in remote or rural communities and to reduce disparities in levels of development between different regions and within regions themselves and recommends that states and regional authorities examine and address rurality as an issue in itself and aim for the adoption of a common definition of the term as well as a coordinated and consistent approach between different levels of governance. R : Chamber of Regions / L : Chamber of Local Authorities ILDG : Independent and Liberal Democrat Group of the Congress EPP/CD : Group European
    [Show full text]
  • Rural Minority Ethnic Experiences: Housing and Health. Briefing 7
    Better Housing Briefing 7 Rural minority ethnic experiences: housing and health Philomena de Lima A Race Equality Foundation Briefing Paper March 2008 Better Housing Briefing 7 Rural minority ethnic experiences: housing and health Key messages 1 A recurrent theme is the emphasis on a numbers-led rather than a needs- or rights-led approach to service delivery. This results in many policy and service providers ignoring the needs of rural minority ethnic people 2 In the rural context, potential barriers to access and use of services consistently emerge. These are: poor access to advice and information; language and communication difficulties; and lack of culturally sensitive services and investment in capacity building 3 The main constraints that emerge in relation to housing are lack of knowledge and access to appropriate information and advice. In addition, there is a lack of understanding and skills among some housing providers with regard to the requirements of minority ethnic households 4 The lack of an evidence base makes it difficult to say with any certainty whether the health of rural minority ethnic households is any different from that of their urban counterparts as well as from rural residents in general. However, as with housing, similar concerns emerge from the scarce evidence that exists Mechanisms for exchanging knowledge and practice are important. There is 5 an urgent need to explore the most appropriate ways of achieving these There is a need for consistent monitoring and evaluation of race equality 6 policies and practices. In this context, gathering independent evidence which assesses the impact of policies and practice on rural minority ethnic households is vital.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evaluation of Multicultural Teaching Concerns Among Pre-Service Teachers in the South
    Journal of Agricultural Education, 55(1), 152-166. doi: 10.5032/jae.2014.01152 The Evaluation of Multicultural Teaching Concerns among Pre-service Teachers in the South Stacy K. Vincent1, Andrea T. Kirby2, Jacque P. Deeds3, and Paula E. Faulkner4 Abstract This descriptive, causal-comparative study of pre-service agriculture education teachers (N = 438) enrolled in universities (n = 31) throughout the south sought to determine a difference in multicultural teaching concern. Variables in the study consisted of pre-service teachers with a with/without a multicultural education requirement, and pre-service teachers with a multicultural education requirement that is taught by an agriculture teacher educator. Results show a negligible effect size in teaching concern between pre-service teachers who have a multicultural education course requirement and pre-service teachers that do not. However, significant differences exist in teaching concern when an agricultural education teacher educator taught the multicultural education course. With the theory of Gay and Kirkland’s (2003) theory of cultural critical consciousness and self-reflection, the researchers provided recommendations for teacher educators, practicing teachers, organizations affiliated with agricultural education, and pre- service teachers. Keywords: cultural consciousness, teacher preparation, teaching concerns, diversity, multicultural education, pre-service teachers The beginning premise of multicultural education was for ethnic minorities to adopt mainstream values and behaviors of the dominant culture in vocational skills, civic duties, and democratic ideals (Banks, 2008). This later evolved after research revealed students being exposed to only Western-European, middle-class, Christian cultures, values, patterns of thinking and history while other cultures were being ignored (Gibson, 2004). Today’s mission of multicultural education encompasses all cultures being important and showcased within the educational system (Banks, 2006).
    [Show full text]
  • Contemporary Rural Social Work Journal
    Contemporary Rural Social Work Journal Volume 7 | Number 2 Article 26 9-1-2015 Contemporary Rural Social Work - Fall 2015 (Volume 7, Number 2) Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.murraystate.edu/crsw Part of the Social Work Commons Recommended Citation (2015) "Contemporary Rural Social Work - Fall 2015 (Volume 7, Number 2)," Contemporary Rural Social Work Journal: Vol. 7 : No. 2 , Article 26. Available at: https://digitalcommons.murraystate.edu/crsw/vol7/iss2/26 This Complete Issue is brought to you for free and open access by Murray State's Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Contemporary Rural Social Work Journal by an authorized editor of Murray State's Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. et al.: Volume 7, Number 2 Contemporary Rural Social Work, Vol. 7 No. 2: Regular Issue, 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS EDITOR-in-CHIEF’S INTRODUCTION Peggy Pittman-Munke ...................................................................................................i FEATURE ARTICLES Building Collaboratives with Southern Rural African American Churches through the Integration of the Interorganizational Collaborative Framework Alex D. Colvin, Angela Bullock.....................................................................................1 Longitudinal Description of Developmental Youth Assets and Substance Use: A Cohort Study of Rural Youth Michael P. Vimont ........................................................................................................18
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Diversity in Appalachia
    Economic Diversity in Appalachia Statistics, Strategies, and Guides for Action February 2014 Prepared for the Appalachian Regional Commission ECONOMIC DIVERSITY IN APPALACHIA CONTENTS List of Tables ...................................................................................................................... iii List of Figures ..................................................................................................................... iii About this Report .............................................................................................................. iv Executive Summary ............................................................................................................ v Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 1 Research on Diversity and Regional Development ............................................................. 3 Economic Diversity and Regional Stability ..................................................................... 3 Economic Diversity and Regional Growth ...................................................................... 4 Industrial Specializations and Regional Growth and Stability ........................................ 4 Summary ........................................................................................................................ 5 Appalachian diversity: A Statistical portrait ....................................................................... 6 Diversity is
    [Show full text]
  • The US Economic Environment Is Quite Favorable for Rural Areas
    he U.S. economic environment is quite favorable for rural areas. Domestic economic growth in 2005 is expected to be above average, Tpropelled by a rise in wages, business profits, and relatively low interest rates. While world economic growth is slowing, it is expected to remain better than average. This growth and the appreciation of many currencies against the dollar should increase exports of U.S. manufactured goods and farm products, both of which are important to the rural economy. The manufacturing picture, however, will be mixed, with some industries doing well and others stagnating. Expected low, long-term interest rates and strong business profits will support higher business equipment spending and encourage employers to hire more workers. A widening U.S. trade deficit and higher oil and natural gas prices will moderate GDP and job growth. Also, continued Federal Reserve interest rate hikes are expected to eventually soften some parts of the economy. Rural recreation and tourism are expected to benefit from the strong 2005 economy. The relatively low interest rates, rising personal income, and rising real estate prices of recent years induced many individuals to purchase second houses in rural areas as future retirement homes or as real estate investments. In addition, despite high gasoline prices, this year is expected to see increased travel and spending on recreation and tourism. The recreation and tourism industries are important to many rural communities with cultural or natural amenities. At the time of this writing, it is difficult to estimate the overall impact of Hurricane Katrina on the South and on the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Rural Communities Leading the Way. Conference Proceedings of the American Council on Rural Special Education (San Antonio, Texas, March 26-29, 1997)
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 406 085 RC 020 986 AUTHOR Montgomery, Diane, Ed. TITLE Promoting Progress in Times of Change: Rural Communities Leading the Way. Conference Proceedings of the American Council on Rural Special Education (San Antonio, Texas, March 26-29, 1997). INSTITUTION American Council on Rural Special Education. PUB DATE Mar 97 NOTE 434p.; For selected individual papers, see RC 020 987-999 and RC 021 000-026. For 1996 conference proceedings, see ED 394 746. PUB TYPE Collected Works Conference Proceedings (021) EDRS PRICE MFO1 /PC18 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS *Disabilities; Distance Education; Early Childhood Education; Educational Technology; Elementary Secondary Education; Gifted; Higher Education; High Risk Students; *Inclusive Schools; Mainstreaming; Minority Groups; Program Descriptions; Regular and Special Education Relationship; Rural Areas; *Rural Education; Rural Schools; *Special Education; Special Education Teachers; Staff Development; Teacher Attitudes; *Teacher Collaboration; *Teacher Education; Transitional Programs ABSTRACT This proceedings includes 62 paper's on rural special education. Papers present promising practices for rural special education, current research, program descriptions,' discussions of theory, and topics of timely concern. The papers are organized in order of presentation, and are categorized in a topical index under the following subjects: administration, at-risk students, collaborative models, early childhood, gifted, multicultural concerns, parents and families, professional development (including
    [Show full text]
  • RURAL VIRGINIA: PROVIDING for the FUTURE Through CHANGING POLICY
    RURAL VIRGINIA: PROVIDING for the FUTURE through CHANGING POLICY George R. McDowell Jeffrey Alwang R. Michael Chandler Virginia’s Rural Economic Analysis Program George R. McDowell is Professor, Jeffrey Alwang is Associate Professor, and R. Michael Chandler is Professor, Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Virginia Tech TABLE OF CONTENTS Background................................................................................................................................ 1 Characteristics of Rural Virginia................................................................................................. 1 Diversity of Rural Problems ....................................................................................................... 4 Growing Areas.................................................................................................................... 4 Declining or Lower than Average Growth Areas ................................................................. 5 Specific Problems ............................................................................................................... 5 Current Policy Affecting Rural Virginia ..................................................................................... 7 What is Known about What Works to Solve Rural Problems ...................................................... 8 Sources of Economic Growth.............................................................................................. 8 The Efficacy of Economic Development Strategies ............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Poverty and Social Exclusion in Rural Areas
    POVERTY AND SOCIAL EXCLUSION IN RURAL AREAS FINAL STUDY REPORT European Commission Directorate-General for Employment, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities Unit E2 Manuscript completed in August 2008 © European Communities, 2008 Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. European Commission 1 Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY........................................................................................................................................................................4 Introduction................................................................................................................................................................................................4 Section I: Describing and understanding rural poverty............................................................................................................................4 Chapter I. Identification of rural areas: problems and methodology.........................................................................................................4 Chapter 2. Main and specific problems of rural areas...............................................................................................................................7 Chapter 3. Poverty and social exclusion in rural areas............................................................................................................................14 Section II: Policies for social inclusion in rural areas............................................................................................................................22
    [Show full text]
  • Immigration and the New Racial Diversity in Rural America*
    Rural Sociology 77(1), 2012, pp. 3–35 DOI: 10.1111/j.1549-0831.2012.00070.x Copyright © 2012, by the Rural Sociological Society Immigration and the New Racial Diversity in Rural America* Daniel T. Lichter Departments of Policy Analysis and Management and Sociology, Cornell Population Center Cornell University Abstract This article highlights the new racial and ethnic diversity in rural America, which may be the most important but least anticipated population shift in recent demographic history. Ethnoracial change is central to virtually every aspect of rural America over the foreseeable future: agro-food systems, community life, labor force change, economic development, schools and schooling, demographic change, intergroup relations, and politics. The goal here is to plainly illustrate how America’s racial and ethnic transformation has emerged as an important dimension of ongoing U.S. urbanization and urbanism, growing cultural and economic heterogeneity, and a putative “decline in community” in rural America. Rural communities provide a natural laboratory for better understanding the implications of uneven settle- ment and racial diversity, acculturation, and economic and political incorpo- ration among Hispanic newcomers. This article raises the prospect of a new racial balkanization and outlines key impediments to full incorporation of Hispanics into rural and small town community life. Immigration and the new ethnoracial diversity will be at the leading edge of major changes in rural community life as the nation moves toward becoming a majority-minority society by 2042. Introduction The conventional view today—usually reinforced by pundits and politicians—is that rural America is made of up mostly of white people of European ancestry.
    [Show full text]
  • An Underrepresentation of Food Deserts in the Rural Appalachian Mountains Kasie Richards East Tennessee State University
    East Tennessee State University Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University Electronic Theses and Dissertations Student Works 8-2012 As the Crow Flies: An Underrepresentation of Food Deserts in the Rural Appalachian Mountains Kasie Richards East Tennessee State University Follow this and additional works at: https://dc.etsu.edu/etd Part of the Policy Design, Analysis, and Evaluation Commons Recommended Citation Richards, Kasie, "As the Crow Flies: An Underrepresentation of Food Deserts in the Rural Appalachian Mountains" (2012). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. Paper 1453. https://dc.etsu.edu/etd/1453 This Dissertation - Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Works at Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. As the Crow Flies: An Underrepresentation of Food Deserts in the Rural Appalachian Mountains ____________________ A dissertation presented to the faculty of the College of Public Health East Tennessee State University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Public Health with a concentration in Community and Behavioral Health ____________________ by Kasie Richards August 2012 ____________________ Dr. Deborah Slawson, Chair Dr. Arsham Alamian Dr. Ke Chen Keywords: Appalachian, “food desert”, “food access”, “food availability”, GIS ABSTRACT As the Crow Flies: An Underrepresentation of Food Deserts in the Rural Appalachian Mountains by Kasie Richards Diet and dietary related health outcomes such as obesity and diabetes are major public health concerns. While personal choice and dietary behaviors are major influences on how an individual eats, the environment influences these choices and behaviors.
    [Show full text]