Comments from Your Wisconsin Department Commander Brothers
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Catherine Mary White Foster's Eyewitness Account of the Battle of Gettysburg, with Background on the Foster Family Union Soldiers David A
Volume 1 Article 5 1995 Catherine Mary White Foster's Eyewitness Account of the Battle of Gettysburg, with Background on the Foster Family Union Soldiers David A. Murdoch Follow this and additional works at: https://cupola.gettysburg.edu/ach Part of the Military History Commons, United States History Commons, and the Women's History Commons Share feedback about the accessibility of this item. Murdoch, David A. (1995) "Catherine Mary White Foster's Eyewitness Account of the Battle of Gettysburg, with Background on the Foster Family Union Soldiers," Adams County History: Vol. 1 , Article 5. Available at: https://cupola.gettysburg.edu/ach/vol1/iss1/5 This open access article is brought to you by The uC pola: Scholarship at Gettysburg College. It has been accepted for inclusion by an authorized administrator of The uC pola. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Catherine Mary White Foster's Eyewitness Account of the Battle of Gettysburg, with Background on the Foster Family Union Soldiers Abstract Catherine Mary White Foster lived with her elderly parents in the red brick house on the northwest corner of Washington and High Streets in Gettysburg at the time of the battle, 1-3 July 1863. She was the only child of James White Foster and Catherine (nee Swope) Foster (a former resident of Lancaster county), who married on 11 May 1817 and settled in Gettysburg, Adams county, Pennsylvania. Her father, James White Foster, had served his country as a first lieutenant in the War of 1812. Her grandparents, James Foster and Catherine (nee White) Foster, had emigrated with her father and five older children from county Donegal, Ireland, in 1790, and settled near New Alexandria, Westmoreland county, Pennsylvania. -
National Register of Historic Places Inventory — Nomination Form 1
FHR-8-300 (11-78) United States Department off the Interior Heritage Conservation and Recreation Service National Register of Historic Places Inventory — Nomination Form See instructions in How to Complete National Register Forms Type all entries — complete applicable sections ________________ 1. Name . historic JeffersoniDavis I Capture Site and/or common 2. Location street & number Approxifflately-4"-4/2 mles north of IrwAnville not for publication city, town Irwinville x vicinity of congressional district 8th <- Billy L. Evans state Georgia code 13 county Irwin code 155 3., Classification Category Ownership Status Present Use district x public x occupied agriculture x museum building(s) private unoccupied commercial X park structure both work in progress educational private residence X site Public Acquisition Accessible entertainment religious _ object in process yes: restricted government scientific being considered x yes: unrestricted industrial transportation no military other: name G. W. Paulk, Chairman, Irwin County Commission city, town Ocilla vicinity of state Georgia 31774 5. Location of Legal Description courthouse, registry of deeds, etc. Superior Court city, town Ocilla state Georgia 6. Representation in Existing Surveys title None has this property been determined elegible? __ yes x no date federal state county local depository for survey records city, town state 7. Description Condition Check one Check one excellent deteriorated unaltered x original site X good $ I ruins X altered moved date fair unexposed Describe the present and original (iff known) physical appearance The 12,668r*acre Jefferson Davis capture site is located approximately one- and one-half wiles north of Irwinville, Irwtn County, Georgia. The site is partly in: relatively undisturbed woods, where a trace of the Old Abbeville Road cuts across a narrow swamp, while the rest of the acreage contains a small, one- story, brick museum, a oner*story, brick caretaker f s house, a small, concrete- block pavillion, restroom facilities, and picnic area. -
Hydrology at War: Bailey's Dam at the Red River Rapids
GEOGRAPHER'S SPACE Hydrology at War Bailey’s Dam at the Red River Rapids BY Richard Campanella erhaps more so than any other state in the When Southern states seceded from the Union in 1861, Union, Louisiana’s human history is a story federal military planners aimed to suppress the rebellion of hydrological manipulation. We’ve steered by encircling the Confederacy as an anaconda grips its water in every conceivable direction: between prey. Ports along the Atlantic and Gulf Coasts would be Plevees when it wanted to overflow, out of swamps it blockaded, and western rivers would be brought under preferred to inundate, onto fields to grow our crops, into control. This strategy made the Red River secondary in the pipes to quench our thirst, through channels to float our beginning of the Civil War, as Union gunboats would first vessels, behind dams when we wanted it to accumulate, have to secure the Ohio River and win back the Mississippi. through pumps when we wanted to remove it, and out Once this had been achieved in 1863, the Red River diversions and spillways when we wanted to relocate it. Valley came squarely into the theater of war. Reasons In some cases, hydrological manipulation has even were threefold: the Red accessed the ample resources been a tactic of war, and there’s no better example of Texas, which in turn abutted Mexico—a potential than Bailey’s Dam on the Red River at Alexandria. Southern ally—while the valley itself was said to hold ample Alexandria is in aptly named Rapides Parish, where stores of cotton, desperately needed for the Union cause. -
'-Siiirma"N;'Willinm -Tecl~Mseh, Soldier, B. in Lancaster, Ohio, 8 Feb., 1820
'-siiiRMA"N;'willinm -Tecl~mseh, soldier, b. in Lancaster, Ohio, 8 Feb., 1820. His branch of the family is traced to Samuel Sherman, of Essex, England, who carne to this country in 1634 with his brother, the Rev. John Sherman, and his cousin. Capt. John Sherman. Roger Sherman. signer of the Declaration of Independence, traces his lineage to the captain, and Gen. Sherman to that of the Rev. John, whose family settled in Woodbury and Norwalk, Conn., whence some of them removed to Lancaster, Fairfield co., Ohio, in 1810. The father of Gen. Sherman was 1\ lawyer. and for five years before his death in 1829 judge of the snpreme court. His mother, who was married in 1810, was Mary Hoyt. They had eleven children. of whom William was the sixth and John the eighth. Will· iam was adopted by Thomas Ewing, and attended school in Lancaster till 1836. In July of that year he was sent as a cadet to West Point, where he was graduated in 1840 sixth in a class of forty-two members. Among his classmates was George H. Thomas. As a cadet, he is remembered as an earnest., high-spiriteo, honorable, and outspoken youth, deeply impressed, according to one of his early letters, with the grave responsibility propel']Y attaching to "serving the country." He also at that time expressed a wish to go to the far west, . out of civilization. He was commissioned as a 2d lieutenant in the Bd artillery, 1 July. 1840, and sent to Florida, where the embers of the Indian war were still smouldering. -
“Old Abe” Camp #8 Commander's Corner
Camp Orders 2011 ~ 2 Sons of Union Veterans of the Civil War Grand Army of the Republic “Old Abe” Camp #8 Wisconsin Department NEXT Commander's MEETING Corner March 21, by Vince Barker 2011 Lower Level Lecture Room, Oshkosh Public Museum, Oshkosh, Wis. Doors open ~ 6:00 PM Meeting Begins Greetings Brothers of Camp 8! at 7:00 PM I hope you all are surviving our rough winter. It may not seem like it but spring is right around the corner and with 1331 Algoma Blvd. it our main activity season in the SUVCW. We have some great events lined up to kick off the Civil War Oshkosh, WI Sesquicentennial, starting with our March meeting in the Lower Level Lecture Room at the Oshkosh Public Musuem “Social Hour” before on March 21st. Start time is our usual 7pm. The museum the business portion curator, Brad Larsen, is giving a presentation on the history begins. and restoration efforts of the 3rd Wisconsin Volunteer Infantry battle flag. Camp 8 is being asked to assist with the restoration costs. It should be a very interesting and informative program. Also, mark your calendars for Saturday, May 21st, for what will probably be our first dedication ceremony of the season. We are dedicating five new headstones in Plummer Cemetery, located just north of Oshkosh, on old Hwy 110. Several of these veterans were well known in the area and the event has stirred up considerable interest among descendants near and far. So far several are planning to attend and are spreading the word to more family members. -
George Henry Thomas Was Appointed a Major General in the Regular Army
George Henry Thomas was appointed a major general in the During the Civil War, Rufus Ingalls was appointed a brevet major regular army and received a formal “Thanks of Congress” for his general in both the regular and volunteer Union forces. success in driving Confederate forces from Tennessee in 1864. (Library of Congress) (Library of Congress) P. G. T. (Pierre Gustave Toutant) Beauregard was one of only William Clarke Quantrill, in Confederate uniform, was not only seven “full” generals in the Confederate Army. a notorious Civil War guerrilla but a former civilian teamster, (National Archives) gambler, and camp cook with the Utah Expedition. (Kansas Historical Society.) APPENDIX A William P. MacKinnon ROOTED IN UTAH Civil War Strategy and Tactics, Generals and Guerrillas n addition to chapter 1, another way to illus- officers—Thomas and Ingalls—displayed Itrate the connection between the Utah and some nervousness over the “irregular” nature Civil Wars (and the impact of the former on of their communications; the more flamboy- the latter) is to probe the extent to which three ant Beauregard was unabashedly assertive. very prominent West Point–trained Civil War It may be helpful to provide a brief biogra- generals had earlier tried to influence pros- phy for each of these three officers, though it ecution of the Utah campaign. They did so will not do justice to their distinguished and by gratuitously sending long memos to their varied service careers. General George Henry military superiors or, in one case, to influen- Thomas (July 31, 1816–March 28, 1870) was tial politicians. These documents contained one of the Union army’s principal command- information about alternate approaches to the ers in the Western Theater and won Union Great Basin accompanied by strategic recom- victories across Kentucky and Tennessee. -
(July-November 1863) Lincoln's Popularit
Chapter Thirty-one “The Signs Look Better”: Victory at the Polls and in the Field (July-November 1863) Lincoln’s popularity soared after the victories at Gettysburg, Vicksburg, and Port Hudson. His old friend from Illinois, Jesse W. Fell, reflected the changed public mood. In August, Fell told Lyman Trumbull that during the early stages of the war, “I did not like some things that were done, and many things that were not done, by the present Administration.” Along with most “earnest, loyal men, I too was a grumbler, because, as we thought, the Gov't. moved too slow.” But looking back, Fell acknowledged that “we are not now disposed to be sensorious [sic] to the ‘powers that be,’ even among ourselves.” To the contrary, “it is now pretty generally conceded, that, all things considered, Mr. Lincoln's Administration has done well.” Such “is the general sentiment out of Copperhead Circles.” Lincoln had been tried, and it was clear “that he is both honest and patriotic; that if he don't go forward as fast as some of us like, he never goes backwards.”1 To a friend in Europe, George D. Morgan explained that the president “is very popular and good men of all sides seem to regard him as the man for the place, for they see what one cannot see abroad, how difficult the position he has to fill, to keep 1 Fell to Lyman Trumbull, Cincinnati, 11 August 1863, Trumbull Papers, Library of Congress. 3378 Michael Burlingame – Abraham Lincoln: A Life – Vol. 2, Chapter 31 the border States quiet, to keep peace with the different generals, and give any satisfaction to the radicals.”2 One of those Radicals, Franklin B. -
What I Saw of Shiloh
December 8, 2016 Bjorn Skaptason General Orders No. 12 - 16 What I Saw of Shiloh: December 2016 IN THIS ISSUE Ambrose Bierce Goes to War MCWRT News ………………….……………..… page 2 Is it not strange that the phantoms of a blood-stained period have so airy a grace and Preservation News.…………………………….. page 2 look with so tender eyes? - That I recall with difficulty the danger and death and Kenosha Museum …………..……..………….. page 3 horrors of the time, and without effort all that was gracious and picturesque? From the Field …………………..….......... page 4-6 Ambrose Bierce Round Table Speakers 2016-2017………. page 7 2016-2017 Board of Directors ……..……. page 7 Ambrose Bierce wrote some of the finest literature in the genre of Meeting Reservation Form …….…..……. page 7 horror fiction of any American author. He also enjoyed a storied career Between the Covers ……………………….. page 8 as one of the greatest journalists of the age of Yellow Journalism at the Wanderings ………………..……….……… pages 9-12 turn of the Twentieth Century. But on April 7, 1862, nineteen year-old Through the Looking Glass …………. page 12-13 Sergeant Bierce of the 9th Indiana regiment faced the real horror of the Quartermaster’s Regalia ………..………… page 14 battle of Shiloh. His vivid chronicle of his experience in this battle rivals December Meeting at a Glance any work of fiction in communicating the drama, the pathos and the [Jackets required for the dining room.] horror of the Civil War and of this battle. Country Club of the Wisconsin Club Ambrose Bierce knew the value of tramping 6200 WEST GOOD HOPE ROAD over battlefields. -
NPS Form 10 900___OMB No. 1024 0018
NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 (Expires 5/31/2012) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. See instructions in National Register Bulletin, How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form. If any item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional certification comments, entries, and narrative items on continuation sheets if needed (NPS Form 10-900a). 1. Name of Property historic name Pleasant Hill Battlefield Historic District other names/site number Old Pleasant Hill, 16DS234 & 16DS235 2. Location street & number Near junction of Louisiana State Highways 175 and 177 NA not for publication city or town Between the towns of Pelican and Pleasant Hill, Louisiana X vicinity state 031 & 71065 Louisiana code LA county DeSoto & Sabine code 085 zip code 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, I hereby certify that this X nomination _ request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property X_ meets _ does not meet the National Register Criteria. I recommend that this property be considered significant at the following level(s) of significance: x national x statewide x local Phil Boggan, Deputy State Historic Preservation Officer Signature of certifying official/Title Date Louisiana Department of Culture, Recreation and Tourism State or Federal agency/bureau or Tribal Government In my opinion, the property meets does not meet the National Register criteria. -
Civil War Era Correspondence Collection
Civil War Era Correspondence Collection Processed by Curtis White – Fall 1994 Reprocessed by Rachel Thompson – Fall 2010 Table of Contents Collection Information Volume of Collection: Two Boxes Collection Dates: Restrictions: Reproduction Rights: Permission to reproduce or publish material in this collection must be obtained in writing from the McLean County Museum of History Location: Archives Historical Sketch Scope and Content Note Biographical Sketches Anonymous: This folder consists of one photocopy of a letter from an unknown soldier to “Sallie” about preparations for the Battle of Allegheny Mountain, Virginia (now West Virginia). Anonymous [J.A.R?]: This folder contains the original and enlarged and darkened copies of a letter describing to the author’s sister his sister the hardships of marching long distances, weather, and sickness. Reuben M. Benjamin was born in June 1833 in New York. He married Laura W. Woodman in 1857. By 1860, they were residents of Bloomington, IL. Benjamin was an attorney and was active in the 1869 Illinois Constitutional Convention. Later, he became an attorney in the lead Granger case of Munn vs. the People which granted the states the right to regulate warehouse and railroad charges. In 1873, he was elected judge in McLean County and helped form the Illinois Wesleyan University law school. His file consists of a transcript of a letter to his wife written from La Grange, TN, dated January 21, 1865. He may have been part of a supply train regiment bringing food and other necessities to Union troops in Memphis, TN. This letter mentions troop movements. Due to poor health, Benjamin served only a few months. -
Margaret Stafford Worth
University of Oklahoma College of Law University of Oklahoma College of Law Digital Commons American Indian and Alaskan Native Documents in the Congressional Serial Set: 1817-1899 5-23-1888 Margaret Stafford Worth. Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.ou.edu/indianserialset Part of the Indian and Aboriginal Law Commons Recommended Citation H.R. Rep. No. 2292, 50th Cong., 1st Sess. (1888) This House Report is brought to you for free and open access by University of Oklahoma College of Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in American Indian and Alaskan Native Documents in the Congressional Serial Set: 1817-1899 by an authorized administrator of University of Oklahoma College of Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. aOTH CoNGRESS, } HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES. REPORT 1st Session. { No.2292. MARGARET STAFFORD WORTH. MAY 23, 1888.-Committed to the Committee of the Whole House and ordered to be printed. M.r. BLISS, from the Committee on Pensions, submitted the following REPORT: [To accompanybill S. 867.1 The Committee on Pensions, to whom was referred the bill (S. 867) granting a pension to Margaret Stafford Worth, report that the case was considered and favorably reported by the Committee on Pensions at the last Congress. This committee again report the c) aim, with the recommendation that it do pass, adopting as its report the statement of facts presented with the former report, as follows: The claimant, Miss Margaret. Stafford Worth, is the only surviving unmarried daughter ofthe distinguished Maj. Gen. WilliamJ. Worth. She is now living in the city of Washington, with seven of her fathe1·'s grandchildren to support, in great povert.y and without adequate means of subsil:;tence. -
Louisiana Environmental Lawyer, Vol 8, No 1, Spring 2004
THE LOUISIANA ENVIRONMENTAL LAWYER Volume 8, Number 1, Summer 2004 The “IT Decision” An Evaluation of its Factual, Judicial and Legislative History and A Consideration of its Future By Al Robert, Jr. The Louisiana Supreme Court weigh them against social and eco- and the subsequent proceedings that decision in Save Ourselves, Inc.1 v. Loui- nomic benefits of the project.”5 These ultimately denied IT Corp. its operat- siana Environmental Control Commis- concerns are commonly referred to as ing permits. Part II affords a brief sion2 was handed down almost twenty part of the public trust doctrine6 and analysis of the decision and its foun- years ago. Commonly referred to as are the source of many concerns and dation and also provides insight into the “IT Decision” (or “IT Case”), the criticisms regarding the “IT Require- the reasoning of the Louisiana Su- case was appealed to the Louisiana ments.” The requirements now con- preme Court. Additionally, Part II Supreme Court by a group of citizens stitute a substantive part of the envi- summarizes the substantial body of who organized Save Ourselves, Inc. ronmental permitting process in Loui- law that has expanded, supplemented, (Save Ourselves) to challenge IT siana. and interpreted the “IT Decision.” Part Corporation’s (IT Corp.) plans to con- III examines common industry criti- struct the “World’s Largest Hazardous The “IT Decision” has been de- cisms of the “IT Decision” and pro- Waste Disposal Facility3 ” in their com- scribed as an infamous,7 wide-rang- vides insights and alternative view- munity.4 Save Ourselves originally in- ing,8 landmark decision9 that judi- points.