sign in sign up
<<
Home , Quasar, Wormhole

arXiv:1303.1301v2 [astro-ph.CO] 15 Apr 2013 cl of scale oia est parameter density logical us n hypoie h osrito t asden- ray its gamma on the constraint hypotheti- as as the the sity provided detected lensing by they be and the nuclei could burst al. that galactic mass et assumed negative active Safonova (1998) cal distant 1995; the al. et of al. Torres Galac- et the 2001a). in (Cramer detected microlensing be could suggested an- tic have deflection authors negative its Several the but sign. that mass, opposite positive the has the gle by that halo. as Galactic same the the acts in case, mass reside this thus negative In could the . masses hand, negative ordinary the other mass as the inertial gravitationally the on If negative, 1997). is Piran (e.g. voids cosmological a.Tengtv assatatec te oform to other Milky each the attract from escape masses to a negative likely The is the it Way. positive, (positive-mass hence is matter and ordinary mass negative objects) the inertial or repels the positive mass If be negative 1961). can Jammer mass mass (e.g. inertial gravitational its its if negative, Even (Bondi is them 1999). the for 1961, evidence since Jammer no 1957; discussed been often has there been century, 19th have ideas the mass gener- thus to negative could sign mass the opposite Negative ate of matter. is normal mass of whose mass matter of concept odto sitoue oepanteosre acceler- observed the explain to the violate the introduced could maintain is that condition and energy be Dark create would 1995). to (Visser condition the order energy as in The solution violated this Morris, wormhole. studied and traversable (1988) (1988) Yurtsever Thorne & & Thorne Morris field Later, scalar tunnel. massless equation 1973). a - (Ellis Einstein introducing by the a relativity of like general solution in wormhole , a the found Ellis of regions tant BET N LI OMOE RMTESONDGTLSYSURVE SKY DIGITAL SLOAN THE FROM ELLIS AND OBJECTS negative h rvttoa esn ytengtv asi the is mass negative the by lensing gravitational The ntertclpyis eaiems sahypothetical a is mass negative physics, theoretical In h omoei yohtclojc oncigdis- connecting object hypothetical a is wormhole The rpittpstuigL using 2018 typeset 6, Preprint August version Draft BEVTOA PE ON NTECSI BNACSO NEGAT OF ABUNDANCES COSMIC THE ON BOUND UPPER OBSERVATIONAL | repulsive ρ | orsod otecsooia est parameter density cosmological the to corresponds | ujc headings: Subject hotradius throat nuprbudi u ntecsi bnacso hs ess Th lenses. these of abundances cosmic is the on objects put compact is mass bound upper an mgslne yteaoetoeoi bet for objects exotic two above the by and lensed objects images compact negative-mass on constraints cosmological M M | h aetrsl nteSonDgtlSySre usrLn Search Lens Survey Sky Digital Sloan the in result latest The . asv lm.Sc lmsmgtrsd in reside might clumps Such clump. massive ∼ | | 10 = 10 0 − . 1 36 12 rvttoa oc.Atog possible Although force. gravitational M 1. gcm − ⊙ 15 A . INTRODUCTION T a M E − tl mltajv 03/07/07 v. emulateapj style X 10 = 3 aut fSineadTcnlg,Hrsk nvriy Hi University, Hirosaki Technology, and of Faculty ⊙ rvttoa esn:srn omlg:observations : – strong lensing: gravitational h ubrdniyo h li omoeis wormhole Ellis the of density number The . | crepnigt h cosmo- the to (corresponding Ω | − . 10 10 4 < n c hc smc mle hnteEnti igradius. ring Einstein the than smaller much is which pc, − 7 rudtemass the around ) 10 yih aaah ieiAsada Hideki & Takahashi Ryuichi − 8 (10 rf eso uut6 2018 6, August version Draft − 4 ) h 3 ABSTRACT Mpc ∼ − 00 itn usr nteSL aa Therefore, data. SQLS the in distant 50000 3 | Ω ttems scale mass the at eety b 21)hssgetdta h wormhole path. 100 the of that radius the throat suggested deflect the has lives at can it (2010) it no if Abe However, makes even Recently, density, universe. it mass our Hence, cosmic in or- the distance. is with to remote wormhole interact contribution at Ellis gravitationally matter The not dinary does universe. and the massless of expansion ated 21)gv h og pe on fisnme density al. number et its of Yoo bound as recently, upper universe More rough the the gave in 2010). (2013) authors Abe as some Al- abundant 2000; as unknown, (Krasnikov is quite microlensing. it that is Galactic speculated abundance the its using though by detected) (or esdqaas(gr ta.20,20,21;Iaaet Inada 2012; 2008, 2006, al. et (Oguri quasars lensed apefo h DSI aaRlae7(oke al. et (York 7 Release 50 lens Data are quasar II There largest SDSS current 2000). the the to from has of is lensing abundances SQLS sample gravitational letter cosmic The latest this the the of survey. using on objects purpose bound exotic upper The such such first of a abundances objects. place absence cosmological lens the The these limit of El- can object. formed the images lens are multiple and quasar normal the mass any of negative without images (the multiple wormhole), objects lis lens above & the Tsukamoto 2013; al. ex- such et 2013). probe (Kitamura Harada gravita- to objects the tool dark observational study otic an to as interests lensing Hence, attracted tional thus recently objects. is luminous has it as and it them wormhole, see directly Ellis to the unlikely by and force mass repulsive because negative the to the mainly ob- owing rare, occurs 1995), Visser very matter 1995; no been have al. et studies Cramer servational 1988; Thorne Mor- (e.g., & wormholes ris Ellis and objects negative-mass ing (Barnacka 2012). bursts ray al. gamma et distant of femtolensing the of than h mg nua eaaino 1 of separation angular image the | hnalgtryfo itn usrpse near passes quasar distant a from ray light a When concern- works theoretical of lot a are there Although < z n 0 = 10 . i 19 = − 10 4 . 6 li omoe.Teeaen multiple no are There wormholes. Ellis − tteglx n lse asrange mass cluster and the at − < n 9 . .TeSL erhdteln ytm in systems lens the searched SQLS The 1. AU oai0686,Japan 036-8561, rosaki 2 . ihteaprn antd brighter magnitude apparent the with 2 10 − 3 − ubrdniyo negative of density number e | M o h hotradius throat the for 4 h , | 3 3 usr nterdhf range the in quasars 836 SL)hssttefirst the set has (SQLS) Mpc > USRLN SEARCH LENS QUASAR Y 10 − − 10 15 3 V-ASCOMPACT IVE-MASS (10 o ag fthe of range a for 7 mcudb constrained be could km 12 ′′ ) − M 20 ⊙ which , ′′ a n on 19 found and ∼ c from 1cm 2 R. Takahashi & H. Asada al. 2012). Note that this is currently the largest homoge- negative−mass object Ellis wormhole neous sample for all the of light. However, there is no lensed image candidate formed by unseen lens objects1 such as the , the , and the dark halo (Oguri & Kayo, private communications). 100 Hence, the absence of the unusual lensed quasar gives a

) strong constraint on the abundances of such exotic lens i 100

,m objects. s 10−2 Throughout this paper, we employ the units of G =

P(z c = 1 and use the cosmological parameters of the Hub- m =17 ble constant h =0.7, the matter density Ωm =0.28 and i 10−4 m =18 the cosmological constant ΩΛ =0.72, which is in concor- z =1.56 i s m =19 dance with the latest WMAP 9yr result (Hinshaw et al. −3 i −5 n=1(Mpc/h) 2012). 10 w/o mag. bias

10 12 14 16 18 0 2 4 2. GRAVITATIONAL LENSING BY NEGATIVE-MASS 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 COMPACT OBJECTS AND ELLIS WORMHOLES M (M /h) a (pc/h) 2.1. Negative-mass compact object Fig. 1.— Multiple lensing probability that a quasar at the The lensing by the negative-mass compact object could redshift zs is lensed by a foreground lens object. Left: Negative- be described by the Schwarzschild lens with its objects. Right: Ellis wormholes. The horizontal axis is the absolute value of mass |M| (left panel) and the throat radius a mass M < 0. The lensing properties such as image po- (right panel). The source redshift is set to be zs = 1.56 that is sitions and magnifications were theoretically studied by the mean redshift of statistical sample. We consider three cases Cramer et al. (1995) and Safonova et al. (2001a,b). The for the of the observed quasar as mi = 17 image angular position θ and the source position β are (orange curve), 18 (blue) and 19 (green). The black curve is the result without the magnification bias. Note that the probability is related via the lens equation, for the fixed number density of the lens n = 1h3Mpc−3 and the result scales as P ∝ n. θ2 β = θ + E , (1) θ a2)(dθ2 + sin2 θdφ2). For Ellis wormholes, the lens equa- with the Einstein angular radius, tion in the weak field approximation becomes, θ 1/2 3 D β = θ − θE 3 , (3) θ = 4 |M| LS , (2) |θ| E  D D  L S with the Einstein angular radius, where DL and DS are the angular-diameter distances πa2 D 1/3 to the lens and the source, DLS is the distance from the LS θE = 2 . (4) lens to the source. The number of images depends on the  4 DLDS  source position: no image forms for β < 2θE, one image The two images form irrespective of the source position forms for β =2θE, and the two images form for β > 2θE − 3 2 1 3 at the positions θ± = (β ± β2 − 4θ )/2. The image at the angular positions, x± = ± 1/2+ 1/4 ± y /27 E q angular separation is ∆θ = |θp+ − θ−|. The magnification 3 3 p 4 4 − ∓1/2 ± 1/4 ± y /27, where x± = θ±/θE and y = of each image is µ± = |1 − θE/θ±|. q We obtain a relation between the typical lens mass β/θE (Toki etp al. 2011; Nakajima & Asada 2012). The −3 −3 and the image angular separation from Eq.(2) as, |M|≃ magnification for each image is µ± = |(1 ∓ x± )(2x± ± 11 −1 ′′ 2 −1 − 1 × 10 h M⊙ (θE/1 ) [(DLDS/DLS)/1h Gpc]. As 1)| 1. 11−14 a result, the sensitive mass range is |M| = 10 M⊙ The typical throat radius for a given θ is estimated as, ′′ ′′ E for the image separation of 1 − 20 . −1 ′′ 3/2 2 −1 2 1/2 a ≃ 10h pc (θE/1 ) [(DLDS/DLS)/(1h Gpc) ] , from Eq.(4). As a result, the sensitive throat radius is 2.2. Ellis wormhole lens a = 10 − 100pc from the image separation of 1′′ − 20′′. The Ellis wormhole is known to be a massless worm- Note that the relevant throat radius is much smaller than hole, which means that the asymptotic mass at infinity the corresponding Einstein radius RE = θE × DL ∼ ′′ −1 is zero. However, this wormhole deflects light by grav- 10kpc(θE/1 )(DL/1h Gpc). In practice, the range of itational lensing (Cl´ement 1984; Chetouani & Cl´ement the radius is slightly wider, since the lensing effects are 1984; Perlick 2004; Nandi et al. 2006; Dey & Sen 2008; dependent also on the distance ratios. Nakajima & Asada 2012; Gibbons & Vyska 2012) be- 3. STRONG LENSING PROBABILITY cause of its local curvature of the . The Ellis wormhole is characterized by one parameter as its throat In this section, we discuss the lensing probability that radius a, and the line element is ds2 = dt2 − dr2 − (r2 + a distant quasar is lensed by the foreground negative- mass object or the Ellis wormhole. We assume that the 1 This paper assumes that the negative masses are unseen. How- lens objects are uniformly distributed in the Universe. ever, they might form stars (or ) to emit like the We basically follow the calculation in the SQLS (Oguri usual matter. In this case, it would be difficult to distinguish the negative mass object from the positive one if these spectral energy et. al. 2012). The basics of the lensing probability is distributions are the same. However the spectra of such negative- discussed in Schneider et al. (1992, 2006). The proba- mass stars are quite unknown. bility is roughly estimated as a product of the distance Upper bound on the cosmic abundances of the negative-mass object and the Ellis wormhole 3

5 to the quasar DS, the number density of the lens n, and 10 the cross section σ, i.e. P ∼ nσDS. Here, the cross sec- negative−mass object tion is defined in the lens and is roughly given by 2 σ ∼ π(DLθE) . upper bound First, we evaluate the cross section. The SQLS

−3 searched multiple quasar images with the image sepa- 0 ration range of 1′′ < ∆θ < 20′′ and with the flux ratio 10 −0.5 µ+/µ− less than 10 . Then, the cross section to form multiple images is (Mpc/h) |Ω|=1

n −2 βmax Φ(L/µ,z ) µ |Ω|=10 σ =2πD2 dββ s Θ 10−0.5 − + L −5 |Ω|=10−4 Zβmin µΦ(L,zs)  µ−  10 ×Θ(∆θ − 1′′)Θ(20′′ − ∆θ) (5) 95% where Θ(x) is the step function: Θ(x)=1 for x ≥ 0 and 68% Θ(x)=0for x< 0. βmin and βmax are the minimum and maximum source positions to form the multiple images: 1010 1012 1014 1016 1018 (βmin,βmax) = (2θE, ∞), and (0, ∞) for the negative- mass lens and the Ellis wormhole. Note that the image mass M (M /h) separation ∆θ and the flux ratio µ+/µ− in the integrand Fig. 2.— Upper bound on the cosmological number density of of Eq.(5) are a function of β. Φ(L,zs) is the quasar negative-mass compact objects. The vertical axis denotes the den- 3 −3 function at zs and this term is so called the sity n (h Mpc ). The horizontal axis denotes the absolute value −1 magnification bias which is a correction term for flux- of the mass |M| (h M⊙). The two solid curves correspond to limited survey. We use the same luminosity function as upper bounds of 68% and 95% confidence levels. The blue dashed lines denote the absolute value of the cosmological density param- that used in Oguri et al. (2012) (see e.g. Croom et al. eter for the negative mass, |Ω| = 10−4, 10−2 and 1. 2009; Richards et al. 2006). We assume that the number density of the lens is con- stant in comoving scale. Then the lensing probability for the quasar at zs with an apparent magnitude mi is zs Ellis wormhole cdt 3 P (zs,mi)= dzl n (1 + zl) σ (6) Z0 dzl 0 where zl is the lens redshift and cdt/dzl =1/(H(zl)(1 + 10

−3 zl)) with the Hubble expansion rate H(zl). upper bound Fig.1 shows the lensing probability for the quasar at the redshift zs with the magnitude mi. The source red-

(Mpc/h) shift is set to be zs =1.56 which is the mean redshift of the statistical sample of quasars in the SQLS. The left n panel is for the negative-mass compact object, and the 95% right panel is for the Ellis wormhole. The horizontal axis −5 68% is the absolute value of the lens mass |M| (left panel) and 10 the throat radius a (right panel). The quasar magnitudes are mi = 17 (orange), 18 (blue) and 19 (green), and the black curve is the result without the magnification bias. 0 2 4 The result is plotted for the fixed number density of the 10 10 10 lens n =1h3Mpc−3 and the probability scales as P ∝ n. throat radius a (pc/h) In order to evaluate the observational upper bound on Fig. 3.— Same as Fig.2, but for the Ellis wormhole. The the number density n of the lenses, we use the likeli- horizontal axis is the throat radius a (h−1pc). hood function introduced in Kochanek (1993), ln L ≃ NQ − j=1 P (zs,j ,mi,j ), where zs,j and mi,j are the red- shift and the apparent magnitude of the j-th quasar. 68% and 95% confidence levels. It turns out that the P −7 −5 3 −3 NQ is the total number of statistical samples of quasars, number density is less than n < 10 (10 )h Mpc 14 12 NQ = 50836. The data of zs,j and mi,j were downloaded for |M| > 10 (10 )M⊙. The blue dashed lines show from the SQLS website2. the absolute value of the cosmological density parame- ter, |Ω| = 10−4, 10−2 and 1. The density parameter is 4. RESULTS defined as the mass density divided by the cosmologi- Fig.2 shows the upper bound on the cosmological num- cal critical density, Ω = Mn/ρcr. As shown in the fig- ure, the density parameter is less than |Ω| < 10−4 for ber density of the negative-mass compact objects. The 12 15 −3 galactic and cluster mass scale |M| = 10 − 10 M⊙. vertical axis is the number density n (h3Mpc ), while As a result, the negative-mass compact object is less the horizontal axis is the absolute value of the mass ∗ −1 abundant than the galaxy with typical luminosity L |M| (h M⊙). The two curves are the upper bound at −2 −3 (ngal ≈ 10 Mpc ) and the with typical 2 14 −4 −3 http://www-utap.phys.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/˜sdss/sqls/ mass 10 M⊙ (nclust ≈ 10 Mpc ), which correspond 4 R. Takahashi & H. Asada to Ωgal ≈ 0.2 for the galaxies and Ωclust ≈ 0.3 for the of such exotic lenses. clusters (e.g. Fukugita & Peebles 2004) Note that our constraint for the negative masses can Fig.3 shows the Ellis wormhole cases. The horizontal be applied only for the compact objects (i.e. its size is axis is the throat radius a (h−1pc). As shown in the smaller than the Einstein radius). As mentioned in the figure, the number density is n< 10−4h3Mpc−3 for a = introduction, the negative masses can attract each other 10 − 104pc. As a result, the Ellis wormhole with a = to form a massive clump. For such negative-mass clouds, 5 0.1 − 10 pc is much less abundant than a (nstar ≈ our upper bound in Fig.2 becomes weaker. For instance, 1010Mpc−3). Note that our extragalactic constraint is one can show that the singular isothermal sphere lens complementary to the galactic one by the microlensing composed of the negative masses does not form multiple that is sensitive for the smaller radius a = 100 − 107km images. In this case, the weak lensing is a more powerful (Abe 2010). The upper-bound curves in Fig.3 approach tool to identify the negative-mass clumps. The nega- straight lines for very small a(≪ 0.1pc) or large a(≫ tive masses could act as voids in the universe, since the 104pc). In the case of a very small a, the lens is very is the underdense region compared with the cosmic mean density and hence its convergence is negative. Sev- close to us since a ∝ DL from Eq.(4) under the fixed θE eral authors reported possible detections of voids by the and DS, while the lens for a very large a is very close to −1/2 weak lensing of background galaxies (e.g. Miyazaki et the source since a ∝ D from Eq.(4). LS al. 2002; Gavazzi & Soucail 2007; Shan et al. 2012) and 5. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION by the integrated Sachs-Wolfe effect in the Cosmic Mi- crowave Background (e.g. Granett et al. 2008; Ili´cet We presented the upper bound on the cosmic abun- al. 2013; Cai et al. 2013). If the density contrast of the dances of the negative-mass compact object and the Ellis void were less than −1, it could be an evidence for the wormhole using the quasar lens sample in the SQLS data negative masses. Because of the low signal-to-noise ratio based on SDSS II. Our main results are summarized in in the present analyses, the next generation surveys are Figs.2 and 3. On-going or surveys such as Pan- awaited. Starrs3, Survey4, Subaru Hyper Suprime- Cam (Miyazaki et al. 2006), Large Synoptic Survey Tele- scope (LSST) 5 will find much more lensed quasars by the RT thanks Masamune Oguri and Issha Kayo for useful foreground galaxies than the SDSS II (Oguri & Marshall comments about the SQLS. HA would like to thank Fu- 2010). Especially, the LSST will find about 8000 lensed mio Abe, Matthias Bartelmann, Matt Visser, Koji Izumi, quasars which are much more than the 19 lensed quasars Takao Kitamura, and Koki Nakajima for stimulating con- in the SQLS. Therefore, the LSST will provide over 100 versations on the exotic lens models. RT is supported by stronger constraint than the current upper bound Grant-in-Aid for Japan Society for the Promotion of Sci- shown in Figs.2 and 3, or might lead to a first detection ence (No. 25287062).

3 http://pan-starrs.ifa.hawaii.edu/public/ 4 http://www.darkenergysurvey.org/ 5 http://www.lsst.org/lsst/

REFERENCES Abe, F. 2010, ApJ, 725, 787 Miyazaki, S., Hamana, T., Shimasaku, K., Furusawa, H., et al. Barnacka, A., Glicenstein, J.-F., & Moderski, R. 2012, PRD, 86, 2002, ApJL, 580, L97 043001 Miyazaki, S., Komiyama, Y., & Nakaya, H. et al. 2006, Proc. SPIE, Bondi, H. 1957, Rev. Mod. Phys., 29, 423 6269, 9 Cai, Y.-C., et al. 2013, submitted to ApJ, arXiv:1301.6136 Morris, M. S., & Thorne, K. S. 1988, Am. J. Ph., 56, 395 Chetouani, L. & Cl´ement, G. 1984, Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 16, 111 Morris, M.S., Thorne, K.S., & Yurtsever, U. 1988, Phys. Rev. Lett., Cl´ement, G. 1984, J. Theor. Phys. 23, 335 61, 1446 Croom, S.M., Richards, G.T., Shanks, T., et al., 2009, MNRAS, Nakajima, K. & Asada, H. 2012, Phys. Rev. D, 85, 107501 399, 1755 Nandi, K. K., Zhang, Y.-Z., & Zakharov, A. V. 2006, Phys. Rev. D, Cramer, J. G., Forward, R. L., Morris, M. S., Visser, M., Benford, 74, 024020 G., & Landis, G. A. 1995, Phys. Rev. D, 51, 3117 Oguri, M., Inada, N., Pindor, B. et al., 2006, AJ, 132, 999 Dey, T. K. & Sen, S. 2008, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 23, 953 Oguri, M., Inada, N., Strauss, M.A. et al., 2008, AJ, 135, 512 Ellis, H. G. 1973, J. Math. Phys., 14, 104 Oguri, M. & Marshall, P.J., 2010, MNRAS, 405, 2579 Fukugita, M. & Peebles, P.J.E. 2004, ApJ, 616, 643 Oguri, M., Inada, N., Strauss, M.A. et al., 2012, AJ, 143, 120 Gavazzi, R. & Soucail, G. 2007, A&A, 462, 459 Perlick, V. 2004, Phys. Rev. D, 69, 064017 Gibbons, G. W., Vyska, M. 2012, Class. Quant. Grav. 29, 065016 Piran, T. 1997, GRG, 29, 1363 Granett, B.R., Neyrinck, M.C., & Szapudi, I. 2008, ApJL, 683, L99 Richards, G.T., Strauss, M.A., Fan, X., et al. 2006, AJ, 131, 2766 Hinshaw, G., Larson, D., Komatsu, E., et al., 2012, Safonova, M., Torres D.F., & Romero, G. E. 2001a, Phys. Rev. D, arXiv:1212.5226, submitted to ApJ Suppl. 65, 023001 Ili´c, S., Langer, M. & Douspis, M. 2013, arXiv:1301.5849, Safonova, M., Torres D.F., & Romero, G. E. 2001b, Mod. Phys. submitted to A&A Lett. A, 16, 153 Inada, N., Oguri, M., Shin, M.-S., et al., 2012, AJ, 143, 119 Schneider, P., Ehlers, J., & Falco, E. E., 1992, Gravitational Lenses Jammer, M. 1961, Concepts of Mass in Classical and Modern (Berlin: Springer) Physics, (Cambridge, Harvard University Press) Schneider, P., Kochanek, C., & Wambsganss, J., 2006, Jammer, M. 1999, Concepts of Mass in Contemporary Physics and Gravitational Lensing: Strong, Weak and Micro (Berlin: Philosophy, (Princeton, Princeton University Press) Springer) Kitamura, T., Nakajima, K., Asada, H. 2013, Phys. Rev. D, 87, Shan, H.Y., Kneib, J.-P., Tao, C., Fan, Z., et al. 2012, ApJ, 748, 027501 56 Kochanek, C.S., 1993, ApJ, 419, 12 Toki, Y., Kitamura, T., Asada, H., & Abe, F., 2011, ApJ, 740, 121 Krasnikov, S. 2000, Phys. Rev. D, 62, 084028 Torres, D. F., Romero, G. E., & Anchordoqui, L. A. 1998, Phys. Rev. D, 58, 123001 Upper bound on the cosmic abundances of the negative-mass object and the Ellis wormhole 5

Tsukamoto, N., Harada, T. 2013, Phys. Rev. D, 87, 024024 York et al. 2000, AJ, 120, 1579 Visser, M. 1995, Lorentzuan Wormholes: From Einstein to Hawking, (NY: AIP) Yoo, C.-M., Harada, T. & Tsukamoto, N. 2013, arXiv:1302.7170