Colour in the Construction and Usage of Monuments of Neolithic Atlantic Europe
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Colour Out of Space: Colour in the Construction and Usage of Monuments of Neolithic Atlantic Europe Penelope Foreman In submission for the award of PhD at Bournemouth University June 2019 Colour Out of Space: Colour in the Construction and Usage of Monuments of Neolithic Atlantic Europe Penelope Foreman Colour is a fundamental human experience – if not a universally constant one. There are, after all, individuals who are colour-blind to various degrees, or even those that see extra colours. However, there is something about the perception and categorisation of colour that is near uniform across humanity, as evidenced by Berlin and Kay’s Basic Color Terms and studies into the key mechanisms of colour vision. Deeper still, it seems to be the case that specific colours re-appear in human art, iconography, ritual and folklore as a leitmotif running through our cultural evolution; that is, the colours red, white, and black. Evidence for this significant triad, as well as other colours showing repeated and deliberate selection, has been gathered and analysed. A summary of the literature on this is presented in this, along with a review with existing work on colour, and why the materiality and material semiotics of stone are important to this research. The aim of this research is to survey a sample of Neolithic monuments across Atlantic Europe, and see if there are any commonalities, significant patterns, and demonstrable signs of specific colour selection that may hint at colour being an important part of Neolithic cosmology – regionally, locally, or culturally. There has been some work touching upon this concept, most recently and notably at the Clava Cairns and sites on Arran; this study will develop this existing research and deepen the understanding of colour use in the Neolithic. In order to see if the fascinating possibilities raised in these works has broader Neolithic context, this research will study sites in similar levels of detail at locations across Atlantic Europe. This will include many styles of monument, from stone circles to passage graves to long barrows to stone rows, in order to evaluate colour significance across a broad range of monument building traditions. Colour was recorded via both human perception and through the use of a digital recording device, custom designed for this project. Recording these colours using a digital tool achieves two things: namely, to go some way towards compensating for the fallibility of the human visual cortex, and to provide a vector for the material properties to speak without being directly interpreted by a human intermediary. This taking into account of the material agency of the stones themselves played a key role in understanding the networks of influence that colours may have had on Neolithic peoples, and how this could have affected their cosmologies. The main stage of this research is six case studies of groupings of Neolithic monuments across the Atlantic façade of north western Europe. Discussion is focused through a lens of these findings along with studies into ethnographic parallels on colour use, stone provenance, and materiality among early farming societies. Using the methodology refined by the initial pilot studies, these six regions are examined for patterns and connections, and analysed both within their own regions and in a wider context, to enable statements on the importance of colour to Neolithic monument builders to be made. 2 This copy of the thesis has been supplied on condition that anyone who consults it is understood to recognise that its copyright rests with its author and due acknowledgement must always be made of the use of any material contained in, or derived from, this thesis. 3 For Julian Who has grown into a wild, adventurous, curious, brilliant child of fields and stones and exploration through the course of this research. Stay wild, stay curious, and keep exploring. I followed my dreams; always, always, follow yours. 4 Table of Contents List of Figures 9 List of Tables 12 Acknowledgements 14 1. Introduction 15 1.1 Colour in Archaeology - a brief background 15 1.2 Research Questions 18 1.3 Aim and Objectives 20 2. Literature review 21 2.1 Colour Categories – how we think about colour 21 2.1.1 Basic Color Terms 21 2.1.2 Critique of Basic Color Terms 24 2.1.3 A pan-human physiological process? 25 2.1.4 The World Color Survey and recent updates to colour category 28 theory 2.2 Ethnographic and archaeological examples of colour – What’s black, white, and red all over? 30 2.2.1 Ethnography - after the data is done 30 2.2.2 How do people look at colours? 31 2.2.2.1 Victor Turner and The Forest of Symbols 31 2.2.2.2 Red, White, Black As A Mode of Thought and related 33 texts 2.2.2.3 Recent Work 35 2.2.3 Procuring materials – symbolism, practicality, or a little of both? 37 2.2.4 Summary of Enthnographic work 41 2.3 Current work on colour in the Neolithic 44 2.4 Materiality 50 2.5 Material agency and “vibrant matter” 52 3. Methodology 55 3.1 Definitions 55 3.2 Site Selection 58 3.2.1 Geography of Atlantic Europe 58 3.2.2 Islands and Mainlands 58 3.3 Recording the Stones 59 3.3.1 Reflexive journaling 59 3.3.2 Public outreach - multivocality in recording the stone 59 3.3.3 Constructing a digital recording device 60 3.3.3.1 Design and prototyping 60 3.3.3.2 Refining the programming 61 3.3.3.3 Construction 62 3.3.3.3.1 Challenges and adaptations in construction 62 3.3.3.4 Rationale for open source software 66 3.4 Analysing the stones 66 3.4.1 QGIS and R - a brief outline and justification 67 3.5 Digital media as mouthpieces for material agency 72 3.5.1 “Born digital” data and its implications 73 3.5.2 Letting stones speak free of human voices? 74 5 3.6 Is phenomenology dead? Object oriented approaches to experiencing 75 the stones 3.7 Assembling the cosmology of colour 76 3.7.1 Assemblage theory and its relevance 76 3.7.2 Russian Dolls - colour in local, regional, international cosmologies 78 and archaeological interpretation itself 3.8 Whither Ethnography? 81 3.8.1 Ethnography's troubled image 81 3.8.2 Timing of ethnographic research - a justification 82 3.9 Summary 82 4. Gathering data digitally: using a colour sensor to map colour patterns in 84 the monuments 4.1 Pilot Study – Bryn Celli Ddu 84 4.1.1 Bryn Celli Ddu - the site in context 85 4.1.2 Recent findings 86 4.1.3 Blueschist as important to Anglesey past and present 86 4.1.4 Methodology - ORAC V1 87 4.1.5 Human responses to stone stories - reflexive journal entries 89 4.1.6 Initial findings 91 4.1.7 Digitally coloured site plan 93 4.1.8 Raw data 94 4.1.9 Follow up study at the Calderstones 95 4.1.9.1 Brief history of the monument 95 4.1.9.2 Geology of the Liverpool area 96 4.1.9.3 Results 97 4.2 Anglesey 99 4.2.1 On sample size and distribution 99 4.2.2 Background 99 4.2.3 Geology of Anglesey 100 4.2.4 Plas Newydd 101 4.2.5 Hendrefor 103 4.2.6 Bodowyr 104 4.2.7 Ty Newydd 106 4.2.8 Trefignath 107 4.2.9 Presaddfed 109 4.2.10 Lligwy 110 4.2.11 Pant y Saer 112 4.2.12 Bryn yr Hen Bobl 114 4.3 Pembrokeshire 116 4.3.1 On sample size and distribution 116 4.3.2 Background 116 4.3.3 Geology of Pembrokeshire 119 4.3.4 Llech-y-Tribedd 121 4.3.5 Trellyffant 122 4.3.6 Carreg Coetan 123 4.3.7 Cerrig – y – Gof 124 4.3.8 Pentre Ifan 128 4.3.9 Bedd yr Afanc 130 4.3.10 Ffyst Samson 132 4.3.11 Carreg Samson 133 4.3.12 Coetan Arthur 134 4.3.13 Treffynon 135 4.3.14 St Elvis Farm 136 6 4.3.15 Carn Llidi 137 4.3.16 Hanging Stone 138 4.3.17 Devil’s Quoit 140 4.3.18 King’s Quoit 141 4.4 Wessex 142 4.4.1 On sample size and distribution 142 4.4.2 Background 142 4.4.3 Geology of Wessex 143 4.4.4 The Avebury Circles / ‘Z Feature’ stones 144 4.4.5 West Kennet Long Barrow 150 4.4.6 Stonehenge 153 4.5 Denmark 157 4.5.1 On sample size and distribution 157 4.5.2 Background 157 4.5.3 Geology of Mon, Denmark 160 4.5.4 Sprove Kong Asgers Høj 160 4.5.5 Sprovedyssen 163 4.5.6 Klekkende-Høj 165 4.5.7 Sømarksdyssen 169 4.6 Sweden 171 4.6.1 On sample size and distribution 171 4.6.2 Background 171 4.6.3 Geology of Falbygdens, Sweden 175 4.6.4 Kyrkerör 175 4.6.5 Lusthushögens 178 4.6.6 Glasthall/Kung Björns Grav 180 4.6.7 Ängshögen, sodra 182 4.6.8 Åttagården 183 4.6.9 Hjelmsrör 185 4.6.10 Girommen, Ekornavallen 187 4.6.11 Klövagårdens (Karleby 57:1) 189 4.6.12 Ragnvalds Kull (Karleby 58:1) 191 4.6.13 Logårds Kulle (Karleby 59:1) 193 4.7 Netherlands 195 4.7.1 On sample size and distribution 195 4.7.2 Background 196 4.7.3 Geology of Drenthe, Netherlands 198 4.7.4 D27 199 4.7.5 D43 201 4.7.6 D47 203 4.7.7 D46 205 4.7.8 D38 207 4.7.9 D39 209 4.7.10 D40 210 4.7.11 D21 212 4.7.12 D22 214 4.7.13 D23 215 4.7.14 D24 217 4.7.15 D25 219 4.8 Summary 220 5.