Modelling and Optimisation of Dynamic Motorway Traffic Ying Li

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Modelling and Optimisation of Dynamic Motorway Traffic Ying Li Modelling and Optimisation of Dynamic Motorway Traffic Thesis submitted to University College London for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Ying Li Department of Civil, Environmental & Geomatic Engineering Centre for Transport Studies University College London December 2015 Declaration I, Ying Li, confirm that the work presented in this thesis is my own. Where information has been derived from other sources, I confirm that this has been indicated in the thesis. Signed: Date: iii Abstract Ramp metering, variable speed limits, and hard shoulder running control strategies have been used for managing motorway traffic congestion. This thesis presents a modelling and optimisation framework for all these control strategies. The optimal control prob- lems that aim to minimise the travel delay on motorways are formulated based upon a macroscopic cell transmission model with piecewise linear fundamental diagram. With the piecewise linear nature of the traffic model, the optimal control problems are for- mulated as linear programming (LP) and are solved by the IBM CPLEX solver. The performance of different control strategies are tested on real scenarios on the M25 Mo- torway in England, where improvements were observed with proper implementation. With considering of the uncertainties in traffic demand and characteristics, this thesis also presents a robust modelling and optimisation framework for dynamic motorway traffic. The proposed robust optimisation aims to minimise both mean and variance of travel delays under a range of uncertain scenarios. The robust optimisation is formulated as a minimax problem and solved by a two stage solution procedure. The performances of the robust ramp metering are illustrated through working examples with traffic data collected from the M25 Motorway. Experiments reveal that the deterministic optimal control would outperform slightly the robust control in terms of minimising average delays, while the robust controller gives a more reliable performance when uncertainty is taken into account. This thesis contributes to the development and validation of dynamic simulation, and deterministic and robust optimisation. v Acknowledgements First and foremost, I would like to present my deep gratitude to my principal supervisor Andy Chow for his incredible support, insightful instructions and detailed comments and suggestions on the thesis. I am forever grateful for his help. I would also like to thank my secondary supervisor Professor B.G. Heydecker for his time to provide sound advice and valuable criticism for completing the thesis. I am also grateful to both examiners Professor Richard Gibbens and Dr Ke Han for their useful comments and suggestions on the thesis. Many staff at the Centre for Transport Studies have assisted me during my stay at University College London. I am particularly grateful to Catherine Holloway, Taku Fujiyama, Nicola Christie, and Helena Titheridge. Special thanks to Angela Cooper (in UCL Centre for Languages & International Education) who supports me on the thesis writing. I would like to convey my warm and profound thanks to my dearest friends in the United Kingdom and China for their patience and invaluable support throughout my study period. I am grateful to my friends and fellow colleagues RuNing Ye, ChienPang Liu, Nuo Duan, Simrn Gill, Shuai Li, Rui Sha, Fang Xu, Aris Pavlides, Matthew Tsang, HuaiDong Wang, SiDi Sun, ZiJia Wang, Kun Liu, MengYang Qin, and Li Zhao for standing beside me along this path and for all the time, joy and sorrow we shared together. I am tremendously indebted to my family members, especially my parents XiaoJuan Zhang and ZhongXian Li, and my master for all their support, care and encouragement. They are the sources of confidence and strength for me to overcome difficulties in study and life. Finally, I would also like to acknowledge Highways England for providing the MIDAS traffic data, and IBM Academic Initiative for providing the software and license for using the CPLEX Optimisation Studio. The contents do not reflect the official views or policies of Highways Agency, and other organisations. vii viii Contents Abstract v Acknowledgements vii List of Figures xiii List of Tables xv Abbreviations xvi Symbols xix 1 Introduction1 1.1 Background and Motivation..........................1 1.2 Review of Traffic Models............................2 1.2.1 Microscopic models...........................3 1.2.2 Macroscopic models..........................6 1.2.3 Discussion................................ 10 1.3 Current Practice of Traffic Control...................... 12 1.3.1 Ramp metering............................. 12 1.3.2 Variable speed limits.......................... 17 1.3.3 Hard shoulder running......................... 19 1.4 Research Contributions............................ 21 1.5 Thesis Outline................................. 23 2 Modelling of Motorway Traffic 25 2.1 Introduction................................... 25 2.2 Cell Transmission Model............................ 25 2.3 Traffic Data................................... 29 ix Contents x 2.3.1 Flow................................... 30 2.3.2 Occupancy............................... 31 2.3.3 Speed.................................. 31 2.3.4 Density................................. 32 2.4 Model Calibration............................... 33 2.4.1 Step 1: Free flow line.......................... 34 2.4.2 Step 2: Capacity............................ 35 2.4.3 Step 3: Congested line......................... 36 2.4.4 Review of procedure.......................... 41 2.5 Summary.................................... 43 3 Optimisation of Ramp Metering 45 3.1 Introduction................................... 45 3.2 Objective Function............................... 46 3.3 Ramp Metering Formulation......................... 50 3.4 Effect of Off-ramp Position.......................... 57 3.5 Sensitivity Analysis of Balance Parameter η ................. 60 3.6 Working Example................................ 63 3.6.1 Without ramp metering........................ 68 3.6.2 With ramp metering.......................... 71 3.7 Summary.................................... 76 4 Optimisation of Variable Speed Limits and Hard Shoulder Running 77 4.1 Introduction................................... 77 4.2 Variable Speed Limits............................. 78 4.2.1 Changes in fundamental diagram under VSL............ 78 4.2.2 Optimisation of VSL.......................... 80 4.2.3 The effect of fundamental diagram specifications under VSL.... 89 4.3 Hard Shoulder Running............................ 94 4.3.1 Changes in fundamental diagram under HSR............ 94 4.3.2 Optimisation of HSR.......................... 95 4.3.3 Optimisation of integrated control strategy............. 97 4.4 Working Example................................ 100 4.4.1 Variable speed limits.......................... 100 4.4.2 Hard shoulder running......................... 102 4.4.3 Integrated control strategy...................... 104 4.5 Summary.................................... 107 Contents xi 5 Robust Optimisation of Ramp Metering 109 5.1 Introduction................................... 109 5.2 Characteristic of Road Traffic Flow...................... 110 5.2.1 Set-valued fundamental diagram................... 110 5.2.2 Demand uncertainty.......................... 114 5.3 Robust Optimisation of Ramp Metering................... 115 5.3.1 Review of robust optimisation..................... 115 5.3.2 Likelihood region............................ 117 5.3.3 Robust ramp metering formulation.................. 122 5.4 Working Example................................ 125 5.5 Summary.................................... 134 6 Concluding Remarks 135 6.1 Summary.................................... 135 6.2 Future Work.................................. 138 A Calculate Density from the Occupancy Measurements 141 B Constrained Regression 143 References 145 List of Figures 1.1 Fundamental diagram.............................6 1.2 Configuration of responsive ramp metering system............. 13 1.3 Demand-capacity ramp metering strategy.................. 14 1.4 ALINEA ramp metering strategy....................... 15 1.5 Variable speed limits in operation....................... 18 1.6 Operation of hard shoulder running on the M42 Motorway......... 20 2.1 Discretisation of a road section........................ 26 2.2 Triangle shaped fundamental diagram.................... 28 2.3 Empirical scatter plot of traffic flow and density.............. 34 2.4 Estimation of free flow speed......................... 36 2.5 Estimation of capacity............................. 37 2.6 Trained regression............................... 41 2.7 Calibrated fundamental diagram for CTM.................. 42 3.1 Specification of outflow ratio......................... 51 3.2 Performance of ramp metering........................ 59 3.3 Delays of ramp metering with η lower than one............... 61 3.4 UK M25 Traffic Speed............................. 64 3.5 UK M25 Motorway map - section between Junctions 10 and 16...... 65 3.6 Observed density count plot - section between Junctions 10 and 16.... 66 3.7 Modelling result between Junctions 12 and 16 over one day........ 70 3.8 Comparison of main road densities (Three Junctions)............ 73 3.9 Ramp queues under metering at Junction 15................ 74 3.10 Comparison of main road delays....................... 75 3.11 Comparison of ramp delays.......................... 75 4.1 Changes in fundamental diagram under VSL with real data........ 79 4.2 Changes in fundamental diagram under VSL...............
Recommended publications
  • M42 Junction 6 Improvement Scheme
    M42 junction 6 Improvement scheme Statutory public consultation 9 January 2018 to 19 February 2018 Contents Introduction ........................................... 3 The scheme in detail (maps) ................. 16 Consultation .......................................... 4 Proposed land requirements ................. 19 Why do we need How this scheme may impact this scheme? ......................................... 6 on you .................................................. 20 Construction impacts ........................... 24 Scheme benefits and objectives ....................................... 7 What happens next ............................. 25 Evolution of the scheme ...................... 8 Proposed timeline ................................. 25 The preferred route ............................. 9 Consultation events ........................... 26 Incorporating your views .................. 10 Consultation information available ......... 26 Deposit point locations ...................... 27 What are we proposing .......................11 Contact information ............................... 27 Cycle routes and non-motorised users (NMU) ................................................... 12 Consultation questionnaire ............... 28 Traffic ................................................... 14 Impacts on the environment ................. 15 2 Introduction Highways England is a Government-owned During 2016, we identified and assessed a number company. We are responsible for the operation, of options to improve the junction. Following
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 5.0 M4 Junctions 3 to 12 Smart Motorway TR010019
    Safe roads, reliable journeys, informed travellers M4 junctions 3 to 12 smart motorway TR010019 5.1 Consultation report Revision 0 March 2015 Planning Act 2008 Infrastructure Planning (Applications: Prescribed Forms and Procedure) Regulations 2009 Volume 5.0 Volume An executive agency of the Department for Transport HIGHWAYS AGENCY – M4 JUNCTIONS 3 TO 12 SMART MOTORWAY TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................ 3 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................. 7 1.1 SCHEME OVERVIEW .............................................................................................................................. 7 1.2 BACKGROUND ....................................................................................................................................... 8 1.3 PURPOSE OF REPORT ......................................................................................................................... 10 1.4 CONSULTATION OVERVIEW ................................................................................................................. 10 1.5 STRUCTURE OF THE REPORT .............................................................................................................. 13 2 LEGISLATIVE CONTEXT ............................................................................................................ 15 2.1 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Birmingham ■ B76 1Al
    maybrook business park BLOCK 10 ■ MINWORTH ■ BIRMINGHAM ■ B76 1AL Last remaining units - incentives available High Quality Industrial & Warehouse Units To Let - from 2,000 sq ft to 3,000 sq ft ■ Modern, fully refurbished units ■ Electric sectional shutter doors ■ Excellent motorway access ■ Open plan offices ■ Close to Birmingham City Centre ■ Male & female toilets WC’s BIRMINGHAM www.maybrookbusinesspark.co.uk maybrook business park BLOCK 10 ■ MINWORTH ■ BIRMINGHAM ■ B76 1AL DESCRIPTION The units benefit from modern steel clad roof and elevations providing thermal insulation to modern standards, concrete floor, 4m eaves (3.5m working height), an electric insulated sectional shutter door and is lit by way of sodium lighting. The offices provide a combination of reception area, toilets, kitchenette and an open plan office area. The offices are carpeted throughout and provide lighting and electric security grilles to windows and shutter to entrance door. Externally, there are demised car parking spaces and a loading area to the unit frontage. Sat Nav Ref A A A51 A51 M6 TollM6 Junction Toll Junction T3 T3 B76 1AL A38 A38 11 11 LOCATION A38 A38 11 11 M6TM6T M42M42 10a 10a The premises are located on the Maybrook M6 ToM6ll Junction Toll Junction T1 T1 A5 A5 A460 A460 M42 JunctionM42 Junction 9 9 Business Park, a popular and multi-occupied estate WalmleyWalmley Ash Ash WOLVERHAMPTOWOLVERHAMPTON N A4 A4 WALSWAALLSALL T3 T3 A5 A5 extending with current tenants including NHS, A4097A4097 9 9 Speedy Hire Group, Edmundson Electrical, Collier 49 49 7 7 SandwelSandwell l 8 8 T1 9 T1 9 TyburTnyburn A38 A38 Motor Group and DHL.
    [Show full text]
  • Marble Portfolio Six Trade Counter Units Let to Marble Portfolio Six Trade Counter Units Let To
    MARBLE PORTFOLIO SIX TRADE COUNTER UNITS LET TO MARBLE PORTFOLIO SIX TRADE COUNTER UNITS LET TO Investment Summary ◆ Opportunity to acquire a south east focused portfolio ◆ All units let to the secure covenant of Multi Tile Limited of well-let trade counter units. (t/a Topps Tiles) ◆ 6 prominent trade counter units totalling ◆ AWULT of c.4.5 years unexpired (certain) 50,517 sq ft (4,693.1 sq m) ◆ Total passing rent of £638,680 per annum ◆ Situated in strong towns/cities within established ◆ All leases subject to annual RPI lined review with a minimum trade locations uplift of 2.5% with the exception of Glasgow which has ◆ Topps Tiles have continued to pay their rent a minimum of 2% uplift throughout the lockdown period ◆ All properties held on Freehold/ Heritable interests Proposal ◆ We are instructed to seek offers in excess of £8,515,000 (Eight Million, Five Hundred and Fifteen Thousand Pounds), subject to contract and exclusive of VAT. A purchase at this level provides a Net Initial Yield of 7.00%, which will rise every year in accordance with the fixed rental increases. YIELD PROFILE: Yield profile assumes 2.5% uplifts and continued occupancy on the same lease terms. 2021 7. 2 0 % 2023 7. 5 0 % 2025 7.9 0 % 2027 8.30% 2029 8.70% 2022 7. 4 0 % 2024 7. 70 % 2026 8.10% 2028 8.50% 2030 9.00% MARBLE PORTFOLIO OF SIX TRADE COUNTER UNITS LET TO TOPPS TILES PORTFOLIO GLASGOW Covenant Multi Tile Limited is a wholly owned subsidiary of Topps Tiles PLC and for the year ending 29/09/2019 Multi-Tile Limited reported a pre-tax profit of £9.08M and Shareholders funds of £197.213M.
    [Show full text]
  • Lagrangian Multi-Class Traffic State Estimation
    Lagrangian Multi-Class Traffic State Estimation Yufei Yuan This thesis is a result from a project funded by Delft University of Technology (TUDelft) and the Netherlands Research School for Transport, Infrastructure and Logistics (TRAIL). Cover illustration: Yufei Yuan and Jing Wei Lagrangian Multi-Class Traffic State Estimation Proefschrift ter verkrijging van de graad van doctor aan de Technische Universiteit Delft, op gezag van de Rector Magnificus prof. ir. K.C.A.M. Luyben, voorzitter van het College voor Promoties, in het openbaar te verdedigen op dinsdag 19 maart 2013 om 10:00 uur door Yufei YUAN Master of Science in Transport and Planning geboren te Guilin, China Dit proefschrift is goedgekeurd door de promotor: Prof. dr. ir. S.P. Hoogendoorn Copromotor: Dr. ir. J.W.C. van Lint Samenstelling promotiecommissie : Rector Magnificus, voorzitter Prof. dr. ir. S.P. Hoogendoorn, Technische Universiteit Delft, promotor Dr. ir. J.W.C. van Lint, Technische Universiteit Delft, copromotor Prof. dr. ir. C. Vuik, Technische Universiteit Delft Prof. ir. L.H. Immers, Technische Universiteit Delft Prof. dr. R.E. Wilson, University of Bristol Prof. dr. L. Leclercq, Ecole´ Nationale des Travaux Publics de l’Etat´ Prof. dr. P.B. Mirchandani, Arizona State University Prof. dr. ir. B. van Arem, Technische Universiteit Delft, reservelid TRAIL Thesis Series no. T2013/5, the Netherlands Research School TRAIL TRAIL P.O. Box 5017 2600 GA Delft The Netherlands Phone: +31 (0) 15 278 6046 E-mail: [email protected] ISBN: 978-90-5584-162-2 Copyright c 2013 by Yufei Yuan All rights reserved. No part of the material protected by this copyright notice may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, in- cluding photocopying, recording or by any information storage and retrieval system, without written permission from the author.
    [Show full text]
  • Questions to the Mayor
    Written Answers to questions not answered at Mayor’s Question Time on 14 October 2009 South London Line Question No: 2651 / 2009 Jenny Jones Will you express your support for the retention of the South London rail service from Victoria to London Bridge via Denmark Hill, and oppose any reduction in this service that is carried out for financial reasons rather than capacity reasons? Oral response given Missing Updates Question No: 2932 / 2009 John Biggs Are there any unusual, novel, or contentious issues that have arisen since the last Mayor’s Question Time meeting, which you have failed to include in either your last written report or your oral update today? Oral response given Limousines and chauffeurs for the Met’s senior officers Question No: 2939 / 2009 Dee Doocey Following your comments at last months MQT, where you said that cars that ferry around Ministers, civil servants, and other people on the ‘taxpayer’s payroll’ should be got rid of, will you be taking action to abolish limousines and chauffeurs for senior MPS officers? Oral response given London Plan Question No: 3106 / 2009 Steve O’Connell What does the Mayor consider to be the most important aspects of the latest draft of the London Plan and how do they reflect his priorities for London? Oral response given 1 Young People Question No: 2745 / 2009 Joanne McCartney What recent initiatives have you delivered for young people in London? Oral response given Congestion Charge Question No: 3072 / 2009 Victoria Borwick Further to your answers to questions 3014/2008 and 1053/2009 on helping the retail economy the Mayor said he would re-look at bringing forward the post-Christmas Congestion Charge-free days to before Christmas.
    [Show full text]
  • Directions to Edgbaston Golf Club Church Road, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 3TB
    Directions to Edgbaston Golf Club Church Road, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 3TB Edgbaston Golf Club is situated just over one mile SW of the centre of Birmingham making it easily accessible by car, train, air or taxi. From the North Leave the M6 motorway at Junction 6 (Spaghetti Junction) and take the A38(M) into the city. Stay in the right hand lane signposted A38 South West. Go over the flyover and then under all of the tunnels.You will emerge on the south side of the city on the A38. Go straight on at the first set of traffic lights with McDonalds on your right and at the next traffic lights take the right hand lane and turn into Wellington Road. Continue on that road until you come to a small roundabout, with a school on your left. Take the second turning (Church Road) with the church on your left hand side. Edgbaston Golf Club entrance is immediately on your left before the traffic lights. (If you miss the Wellington Road turning you will not be able to turn right into Priory Road but will need to continue to Edgbaston Park Road where you can turn right- see below). From the South East Leave the M42 motorway at Junction 3 and take the A435 towards Birmingham City Centre. Stay on this road passing through Kings Heath. Shortly after going through Kings Heath turn left into Queensbridge Road. Go straight on at the small traffic island into Russell Road. At the next island turn left into Edgbaston Road. The Edgbaston Cricket Ground is now on your right.
    [Show full text]
  • Roman Roads of Britain
    Roman Roads of Britain A Wikipedia Compilation by Michael A. Linton PDF generated using the open source mwlib toolkit. See http://code.pediapress.com/ for more information. PDF generated at: Thu, 04 Jul 2013 02:32:02 UTC Contents Articles Roman roads in Britain 1 Ackling Dyke 9 Akeman Street 10 Cade's Road 11 Dere Street 13 Devil's Causeway 17 Ermin Street 20 Ermine Street 21 Fen Causeway 23 Fosse Way 24 Icknield Street 27 King Street (Roman road) 33 Military Way (Hadrian's Wall) 36 Peddars Way 37 Portway 39 Pye Road 40 Stane Street (Chichester) 41 Stane Street (Colchester) 46 Stanegate 48 Watling Street 51 Via Devana 56 Wade's Causeway 57 References Article Sources and Contributors 59 Image Sources, Licenses and Contributors 61 Article Licenses License 63 Roman roads in Britain 1 Roman roads in Britain Roman roads, together with Roman aqueducts and the vast standing Roman army, constituted the three most impressive features of the Roman Empire. In Britain, as in their other provinces, the Romans constructed a comprehensive network of paved trunk roads (i.e. surfaced highways) during their nearly four centuries of occupation (43 - 410 AD). This article focuses on the ca. 2,000 mi (3,200 km) of Roman roads in Britain shown on the Ordnance Survey's Map of Roman Britain.[1] This contains the most accurate and up-to-date layout of certain and probable routes that is readily available to the general public. The pre-Roman Britons used mostly unpaved trackways for their communications, including very ancient ones running along elevated ridges of hills, such as the South Downs Way, now a public long-distance footpath.
    [Show full text]
  • M4 Newport Controlled Motorway Scheme, Wales
    EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE GENERAL ENERGY AND TRANSPORT M4 Newport Controlled Motorway Scheme, Wales TEMPO Secretariat & the Euro-Regional Evaluation Expert Group STR08_M4_Newport_Controlled_Motorway.doc EUROPEAN COMMISSION - DG-TREN TEMPO G UIDELINES FOR REPORTING EVALUATION RESULTS TEMPO S ECRETARIAT Document details: Date of preparation: February 2009 Abstract: Document number: 5028956/261/114 Document version: Issue 2 Status: Issued for general use within TEMPO projects Dissemination level: Public Distribution: TEMPO projects Key audience: Project evaluation managers European Commission Associated texts: Name Organisation Project Tel: Email: Authors: Ceri-Anne Traffic Wales +44 1454 662076 Ceri- Pridham anne.pridham@atkins global.com George Traffic Wales +44 1454 662074 George.Plokamakis@ Plokamakis atkinsglobal.com Document Control Record: Version Main Changes: Contributions from: Date: Issue 1 Initial issue 17 September 2008 Issue 2 Details for Planned evaluation Ceri-Anne Pridham February 2009 STR08_M4_Newport_Controlled_Motorway.doc Page ii EUROPEAN COMMISSION - DG-TREN TEMPO G UIDELINES FOR REPORTING EVALUATION RESULTS TEMPO E VALUATION EXPERT GROUP TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. KEY EVALUATION RESULTS ......................................................................................... 1 1.1 Impact on Traffic Flow ..............................................................................................................................1 1.2 Impact on Increased Safety......................................................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • The A38 Trunk Road (Worcestershire/Gloucestershire) (Detrunking) Order 2002 and Shall Come Into Force on 17Th May 2002
    Status: This is the original version (as it was originally made). This item of legislation is currently only available in its original format. STATUTORY INSTRUMENTS 2002 No. 1179 HIGHWAYS, ENGLAND The A38 Trunk Road (Worcestershire/ Gloucestershire) (Detrunking) Order 2002 Made - - - - 26th April 2002 Coming into force - - 17th May 2002 The Secretary of State for Transport, Local Government and the Regions makes this Order in exercise of powers conferred by sections 10 and 12 of the Highways Act 1980(1) and now vested in him(2) and of all other powers enabling him in that behalf:— 1. This Order may be cited as the A38 Trunk Road (Worcestershire/Gloucestershire) (Detrunking) Order 2002 and shall come into force on 17th May 2002. 2. In this Order— (i) “the plan” means the plan folio numbered HA 10/OD/307 consisting of sheets 1, 2 and 3 and marked “The A38 Trunk Road (Worcestershire/Gloucestershire) (Detrunking) Order 2002,” signed by the authority of the Secretary of State for Transport, Local Government and the Regions and deposited at DTLR Records Management Branch, Floor 13 (IMD), Ashdown House, St. Leonards on Sea, Hastings, East Sussex TN37 7GA; (ii) “principal road” as a classification for a highway, means that the highway is a principal road for the purposes of enactments and instruments which refer to highways classified as principal roads and is also classified for the purpose of every other enactment and instrument which refers to highways classified by the Secretary of State; and (iii) “the trunk road” means the A38 Trunk Road 3. The length of the trunk road described in the Schedule to this Order shall cease to be a trunk road and shall be classified as a principal road from the date on which the Order comes into force.
    [Show full text]
  • Vehicles and Infrastructure the Fourth of Eight Reports from the Transport Visions Network
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by UWE Bristol Research Repository Transport Visions Vehicles and Infrastructure The fourth of eight reports from the Transport Visions Network Authors Greg Marsden, Glenn Lyons, Mark Beecroft and Kiron Chatterjee Transportation Research Group, University of Southampton Editorial Board Jennifer Abley Cranfield University Mags Adams Lancaster University Simon Barnett Suffolk County Council Gary Burnett University of Nottingham Ali Clabburn Liftshare.com Richard Clegg University of York Matthew Frost Nottingham Trent University Simon Hubbard Peter Brett Associates Toby Rackliff Dumfries and Galloway Council Andrew Salkeld Leicester City Council The Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council, the Rees Jeffreys Road Fund and the Department of Transport, Local Government and the Regions, as sponsors of the Transport Visions Network, are very gratefully acknowledged. The views of individuals conveyed in this report are their own and do not necessarily reflect those of their respective employers. TRANSPORT VISIONS Vehicles and Infrastructure 1 Published by Landor Publishing Ltd Quadrant House 250 Kennington Lane London SE11 5RD First published February 2002 © Landor Publishing All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced without written permission from the publisher. ISBN 1 899650 28 8 No responsibility for any loss as a consequence of any person relying upon the information or the views contained in this publication is accepted by the authors, contributors, or publishers. TRANSPORT VISIONS Vehicles and Infrastructure 2 Contents Preface ................................................................................5 Introduction........................................................................9 1. Today's Vehicles and Infrastructure ............................ 13 2. Tomorrow's Vehicles and Infrastructure..................... 23 3. A Vision: Control Culture............................................
    [Show full text]
  • Effective Road and Traffic Management: Memoranda Received
    This bundle: 55 & 56 Effective road and traffic management: Memoranda Received No. Author 28 National Grid plc 01 Leornard Wells 28a Supplementary from National Grid plc 02 David Nelsey 29 National Joint Utilities Group (NJUG) 03 English Heritage 29a Supplementary from NJUG 04 Ken Todd 30 Stagecoach Group plc 05 Urban Traffic Management & Control (UTMC) 31 Road Haulage Association (RHA) 05a Supplementary from UTMC and the IHE 32 Capita Symonds 06 Intelligent Transport Systems (UK) 33 Donald Bowler 06a Supplementary from ITS (UK) 34 Stephen Plowden 07 Transport Research Laboratory (TRL) 35 City of London Corporation 08 David Metz 36 Chartered Institute of Logistics and Transport (CILT) 09 London TravelWatch 36a Supplementary from CILT 10 Passenger Focus 37 Jonathan Smith 11 Surrey County Council 38 Tony Wyer 12 ADEPT 39 Institution of Engineering and Technology 13 Cambridge Cycling Campaign 40 Transport Planning Society 14 Institute of Highway Engineers (IHE) 41 AA 15 Martin Cassini 42 Joint Authorities Group (UK) 16 Passenger Transport Executive Group (pteg) 43 CTC, the national cyclists' organisation 16a Supplementary from pteg 44 Halcrow 17 RAC Foundation 45 Chris Leithead 18 Campaign for Better Transport 46 Sustrans 19 liftshare 47 Freight Transport Association (FTA) 20 MIRA 48 Living Streets 21 Local Government Technical Advisers Group 49 Motorcycle Action Group (UK) 22 Chartered Institute of Highways and Transport 50 Cadence Driver Development 23 Network Rail 51 Motor Cycle Industry Association (MCI) 24 Kapsch TrafficCom 52 Greater London Authority 25 Department for Transport 53 Association of Chief Police Officers (ACPO) 26 Michael Coles 54 London Councils 26a Further evidence from Michael Coles 55 Cycle Sheffield 27 Green Light Group (GLG) 56 Nottinghamshire County Council Written evidence from Leonard Wells (ETM 01) I am a 70 year old pensioner.
    [Show full text]