Discovering True Muonium at Lhcb

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

CERN-TH-2019-049 Discovering True Muonium at LHCb Xabier Cid Vidal,1, ∗ Philip Ilten,2, y Jonathan Plews,2, z Brian Shuve,3, 4, x and Yotam Soreq5, 6, { 1Instituto Galego de Fısica de Altas Enerxıas (IGFAE), Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain 2School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B152 2TT, UK 3Harvey Mudd College, 301 Platt Blvd., Claremont, CA 91711, USA 4University of California, 900 University Ave., Riverside, CA 92521, USA 5Theoretical Physics Department, CERN, CH-1211 Geneva 23, Switzerland 6Department of Physics, Technion, Haifa 32000, Israel We study the potential of the LHCb experiment to discover, for the first time, the µ+µ− true 3 muonium bound state. We propose a search for the vector 1 S1 state, TM, which kinetically mixes with the photon and dominantly decays to e+e−. We demonstrate that a search for η ! γTM, TM! e+e− in a displaced vertex can exceed a significance of 5 standard deviations assuming statistical uncertainties. We present two possible searches: an inclusive search for the e+e− vertex, and an exclusive search which requires an additional photon and a reconstruction of the η mass. I. INTRODUCTION cay are to γγ, which is challenging to reconstruct with the LHCb detector. Therefore, we concentrate on the discovery of , the spin-triplet true muonium state. Electromagnetic (EM) interactions between oppositely Other possibleTM search avenues for are with the cur- charged particles form bound states; by far, the most well TM known of these are the atoms. Similar atom-like bound rently running HPS experiment [19] or via rare B decays states of elementary particles have since been discovered, into leptonium at LHCb [20]. However, both of these including positronium (a bound state of e+e−) [1] and methods are statistically limited with potentially large muonium (a bound state of µ+e−) [2]. The properties of backgrounds and are not expected to have discovery po- these bound states are predicted by quantum electrody- tential. The proposed RedTop [21, 22] experiment at namics (QED), and measurements of the mass and spec- Fermilab is designed to produce a large flux of η mesons, tra provide precision tests of QED. and using the methods outlined in this work, might also be sensitive to . Searching for a γ final state However, there remain heavier QED bound states that from e+e− collisionsTM has also been proposedTM [23], which have not yet been experimentally observed which can pro- may be accessible to Belle II. However, discovery is vide unique probes that are sensitive to beyond the stan- not expected given the Belle II dark photonTM reach [24]. dard model (BSM) physics. In particular, the hypoth- + − The rest of the paper is organized as follows. In Sec- esized bound state known as true muonium (µ µ ) [3] tions II and III we describe the analogy between and has yet to be discovered. In this work, we explore the dark-photon and highlight the differences. SectionTM IV potential of the LHCb experiment to discover the lowest contains the details of the proposed LHCb search. We spin-1 state of true muonium via its displaced decays to + − conclude in Section V. The appendices contains techni- e e pairs. We show that true muonium can be observed cal details and a discussion about and new physics. with a statistical significance exceeding 5 standard devi- TM ations using the expected 15 fb−1 of LHC Run 3 data to be collected with the upgraded LHCb detector [4{9]. II. TRUE MUONIUM SIGNAL AS A DARK The most promising true muonium state for discov- PHOTON 3 ery is the 1 S1 state, which in the non-relativistic limit has zero orbital angular momentum and is in the spin- arXiv:1904.08458v2 [hep-ph] 13 Sep 2019 Dark photons are massive spin-1 states that couple via triplet state. This vector muonium state, which we de- a kinetic mixing " to the standard model (SM) photon: note as , kinetically mixes with the photon resulting in a phenomenologyTM similar to the dark photon [10{15]. Dark photons have been the subject of much recent study, " 0µν Fµν F ; (1) e.g. [16{18], allowing us to use these latest developments L ⊃ 2 in the discovery of at LHCb. Note that spin-singlet µν 0µν true muonium statesTM also exist, but their dominant de- where F and F are the dark photon and SM pho- ton field strengths, respectively. The phenomenology of is similar to that of a dark photon, and the mass and kineticTM mixing are predicted by QED at leading order: ∗Electronic address: [email protected] yElectronic address: [email protected] z Electronic address: [email protected] mTM = 2mµ BE 211 MeV ; (2) x − ≈ Electronic address: [email protected] 2 −5 { "TM = α =2 2:66 10 ; (3) Electronic address: [email protected] ≈ × 2 2 2 where BE mµα =4 = 1:41 keV is the binding 10− ≈ TM energy, estimated in the non-relativistic limit. Our result Belle II FASER is in agreement with Ref. [25], where the kinetic mixing of HPS SeaQuest hidden sector onium states was calculated. We emphasise 10 3 + − LHCb µ µ− SHiP that the above analogy between and the dark photon 0 LHCb D∗ is valid only at energies close to theTM mass, as relevant TM 4 to our study. 10− [unitless] As noted earlier, decays through the same kinetic ε mixing to an e+e− finalTM state with a branching fraction of TM 5 BR( e+e−) 98 %, while the sub-dominant decay 10− modeTM! has BR( ≈ 3γ) 1:7 % . The lifetime at leading order isTM! ≈ TM 6 10− 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.40 m [GeV] 6 −12 FIG. 1: Dark photon parameter space in dark photon mass τTM 5 1:8 10 sec : (4) ≈ α mµ ≈ × and kinetic mixing with (gray) previous limits and future reach from (magenta) Belle II, (purple) FASER, (cyan) HPS, and (green/yellow) LHCb. TM corresponds to the marked Because of the forward coverage of LHCb, light par- point, using Eqs. (2) and (3). ticles produced within LHCb acceptance typically have large boosts. Given the expected boost of within LHCb and the relatively long proper lifetimeTM of 0:53 mm, III. DISSOCIATION OF TRUE MUONIUM the decay of into e+e− within LHCb will typically TM produce a resolvable displaced vertex. While searches Because is a bound state rather than an elemen- for long-lived particles typically focus on new BSM tary particle,TM there are significant differences between states [26], is an example of a SM long-lived par- and dark photon phenomenology. Most importantly, TM ticle that can be searched for at LHCb. Predictions of TM can dissociate when the constituent muons of the the mass and lifetime at higher order than those derived boundTM state interact with the detector material, result- here are available [22, 27]; however, it is unlikely that ing in a separated µ+ and µ− with an invariant mass just LHCb will be sensitive to these higher order corrections. above the mass of , mTM. TM Since and dark photon phenomenology are sim- The dissociation cross section is estimated to TM 2 ilar, excludingTM dissociation detailed in Section III, be [34{37] σTM!µµ 13Z b , where Z is the atomic ≈ projected darkTM photon reaches from future experiments number of the material inducing the dissociation. The can provide a rough guide to sensitivity. In Fig. 1 the bulk of the material traversed by within LHCb prior TM dark photon parameter spaceTM is plotted in dark photon to its decay is the aluminum radio frequencey (RF)-foil mass (m) and kinetic mixing (") using Darkcast [28], (made of AlMg3) and the silicon vertex locator (VELO) where corresponds to a single point given by the " sensors. Since both aluminum and silicon have similar and mTMof Eqs. (2) and (3). The gray regions correspond Z and number densities, the mean free path for TM to already excluded parameter space, while the colored traversing the material of the detector is, regions represent possible reach from relevant future ex- periments. Dashed lines indicate experiments where dis- −1 −1 λ = σTM!µµna 13 mm ; (5) sociation will be an issue. These include searches by ≈ FASER [29], SeaQuest [30], and SHiP [31] where where the number density is na 6:0 (5:0) will dissociate as it passes through the shielding. TM 1019 atoms=mm3 [38] and Z = 13≈ (14) for alu-× ∗0 0 0 + minum (silicon). Thus, the probability of dissoci- Both the proposed LHCb D D A ( e e) [32] TM and inclusive A0( µ+µ−) [33] searches! are! shown, to ating is given by demonstrate how! dark photon searches based on this study could be used to fill the gap between the two −x/λ dis = 1 e ; (6) searches. The dashed regions for these LHCb searches P − correspond to post-module search strategies where the where x is the distance of the material traversed. The will dissociate. The expected displaced reach of RF-foil will have a nominal width of 0:25 mm in Run 3 HPSTM [19] does not cover the parameter space point, and the VELO sensors a nominal width of 0:2 mm. Con- and will also suffer from someTM dissociation. Additionally, sequently, every encounter of with material in the the expected prompt Belle II reach [24] does not extend VELO results in a minimum dissociationTM probability of to large enough lifetimes to discover , and the nom- dis & 90%. inal Belle II lifetime resolution will notTM be sufficient for P Given the expected material budget of the LHCb de- effective displaced searches.
Recommended publications
  • The Lamb Shift Experiment in Muonic Hydrogen

    The Lamb Shift Experiment in Muonic Hydrogen

    The Lamb Shift Experiment in Muonic Hydrogen Dissertation submitted to the Physics Faculty of the Ludwig{Maximilians{University Munich by Aldo Sady Antognini from Bellinzona, Switzerland Munich, November 2005 1st Referee : Prof. Dr. Theodor W. H¨ansch 2nd Referee : Prof. Dr. Dietrich Habs Date of the Oral Examination : December 21, 2005 Even if I don't think, I am. Itsuo Tsuda Je suis ou` je ne pense pas, je pense ou` je ne suis pas. Jacques Lacan A mia mamma e mio papa` con tanto amore Abstract The subject of this thesis is the muonic hydrogen (µ−p) Lamb shift experiment being performed at the Paul Scherrer Institute, Switzerland. Its goal is to measure the 2S 2P − energy difference in µp atoms by laser spectroscopy and to deduce the proton root{mean{ −3 square (rms) charge radius rp with 10 precision, an order of magnitude better than presently known. This would make it possible to test bound{state quantum electrody- namics (QED) in hydrogen at the relative accuracy level of 10−7, and will lead to an improvement in the determination of the Rydberg constant by more than a factor of seven. Moreover it will represent a benchmark for QCD theories. The experiment is based on the measurement of the energy difference between the F=1 F=2 2S1=2 and 2P3=2 levels in µp atoms to a precision of 30 ppm, using a pulsed laser tunable at wavelengths around 6 µm. Negative muons from a unique low{energy muon beam are −1 stopped at a rate of 70 s in 0.6 hPa of H2 gas.
  • Muonium-Antimuonium Conversion Abstract

    Muonium-Antimuonium Conversion Abstract

    SciPost Phys. Proc. 5, 009 (2021) Muonium-antimuonium conversion Lorenz Willmann? and Klaus Jungmann Van Swinderen Institute, University of Groningen, 9747 AA, Groningen, The Netherlands ? [email protected] Review of Particle Physics at PSI doi:10.21468/SciPostPhysProc.5 Abstract The MACS experiment performed at PSI in the 1990s provided an yet unchallenged upper bound on the probability for a spontaneous conversion of the muonium atom, + + M =(µ e−), into its antiatom, antimuonium M =(µ−e ). It comprises the culmination of a series of measurements at various accelerator laboratories worldwide. The experimen- tal limits on the process have provided input and steering for the further development of a variety of theoretical models beyond the standard theory, in particular for mod- els which address lepton number violating processes and matter-antimatter oscillations. Several models beyond the standard theory could be strongly disfavored. There is inter- est in a new measurement and improved sensitivity could be reached by exploiting the time evolution of the conversion process, e.g., at intense pulsed muonium sources. Copyright L. Willmann and K. Jungmann. Received 16-02-2021 This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Accepted 28-04-2021 Check for Attribution 4.0 International License. Published 06-09-2021 updates Published by the SciPost Foundation. doi:10.21468/SciPostPhysProc.5.009 9.1 Introduction + The bound state of a positive muon (µ ) and an electron (e−) is an exotic atom which has been named muonium (M) by V.Telegdi. This exotic atom was first produced and observed by V.W. Hughes and collaborators in 1960 [1].
  • Hadronic Light-By-Light Contribution to $(G-2) \Mu $ from Lattice QCD: A

    Hadronic Light-By-Light Contribution to $(G-2) \Mu $ from Lattice QCD: A

    MITP/21-019 CERN-TH-2021-047 Hadronic light-by-light contribution to (g − 2)µ from lattice QCD: a complete calculation En-Hung Chao,1 Renwick J. Hudspith,1 Antoine G´erardin,2 Jeremy R. Green,3 Harvey B. Meyer,1, 4, 5 and Konstantin Ottnad1 1PRISMA+ Cluster of Excellence & Institut f¨urKernphysik, Johannes Gutenberg-Universit¨atMainz, D-55099 Mainz, Germany 2Aix Marseille Univ, Universit´ede Toulon, CNRS, CPT, Marseille, France 3Theoretical Physics Department, CERN, 1211 Geneva 23, Switzerland 4Helmholtz Institut Mainz, Staudingerweg 18, D-55128 Mainz, Germany 5GSI Helmholtzzentrum f¨urSchwerionenforschung, Darmstadt, Germany (Dated: April 7, 2021) We compute the hadronic light-by-light scattering contribution to the muon g 2 − from the up, down, and strange-quark sector directly using lattice QCD. Our calcu- lation features evaluations of all possible Wick-contractions of the relevant hadronic four-point function and incorporates several different pion masses, volumes, and lattice-spacings. We obtain a value of aHlbl = 106:8(14:7) 10−11 (adding statistical µ × and systematic errors in quadrature), which is consistent with current phenomenolog- ical estimates and a previous lattice determination. It now appears conclusive that the hadronic light-by-light contribution cannot explain the current tension between theory and experiment for the muon g 2. − I. INTRODUCTION The anomalous magnetic moment of the muon, aµ (g 2)µ=2, is one of the most precisely measured quantities of the Standard Model (SM)≡ of− particle physics. Its value is of considerable interest to the physics community as, currently, there exists a 3:7σ tension between the experimental determination of Ref.
  • Angular Distribution Measurement of Beam-Foil Muonium Part II: Muon Injection Simulation for a New Muon G-2 Experiment

    Angular Distribution Measurement of Beam-Foil Muonium Part II: Muon Injection Simulation for a New Muon G-2 Experiment

    LAr-12380-T DE93 002178 Part I: Angular Distribution Measurement of Beam-Foil Muonium Part II: Muon Injection Simulation for a New Muon g-2 Experiment Hyo Eun Ahn* 'Guest Scientist at Los Alamos. Department of Physics, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511-8167. DISTFUDUTiCN Of-' TH5S DOCUMENT 16 f7\\C^ /A\ fl^ir?Trr)/?^i(^ Los A|amos National Laboratoryy L ^© ZAiUaiLI LJ U\VJ& LoL s Alamos.NeAlN w MexicMi o 8754875455 Acknowledgement s I thank my advisor, Vernon Hughes, for his support and guidance throughout the last five years and for providing me an opportunity to work on both muonium experiments at LAMPF and the simulation study on muon g—2 experiment at BNL. I am grateful to Walter Lysenko for introducing me to the simulation study of muon injection and the availability of his help whenever I need. I also like to thank my collaborators for the angular distribution experiment. They are Frank Chmely, Ver- non Hughes, Steve Kittell, Yunan Kuang, Bjorn Matthias, Hans-Jurgen Mundinger, Benwen Ni, Gisbert zu Putlitz, Reiner Schaefer, and Kim Woodle. This experiment would not have been possible without the effort and commitment of these co-workers. Special thanks goes to Bjorn Matthias ior many helpful remarks and discussion from the first stage of data analysis to reading this manuscript. Technical support from LAMPF staff was marvelous. Thanks goes to Jov Ivie, Chandra Pillai, Richard Werbeck, and the LAMPF staff. I appreciate the help of the staff at the data analysis center (DAC) of LAMPF; they are Art Chavez, John Faucett, Elvira Martinez, and Mike Oothoudt.
  • Experimental Limits for the Electron-Proton Charge Difference and for the Neutron Charge

    Experimental Limits for the Electron-Proton Charge Difference and for the Neutron Charge

    790 Session P 1 (II and III) polarized muons were stopped in argon Our recent measurements of the asymmetry para­ at different magnetic fields and for case I pions were meter, a, for various gases at high pressure, done in stopped. The solid curves were obtained from the a free muon precession experiment3), give : analysis of the data and represent the per cent am­ plitude of A compared to the total counting rate. The dashed curves are theoretical line shapes centered in each case at the muonium precession frequency predicted from the measured value of the magnetic field. Resonances are clearly seen in cases II and Since depolarization in this experiment is a necessary III and indicate abundant formation of muonium condition for muonium formation, it can be conclu­ in pure argon. ded that no more than one half of the muons stopping The general conditions required to form muonium in SF6 and 02 form muonium, whereas all of the and to retain its polarization are not well understood. muons may form muonium in A, N2, and N20. From our experiments alone it is not determined In view of the abundant formation of muonium in whether the high purity of the argon gas is required, pure argon, it should be possible to measure the although if they are combined with unpublished hyperfine structure, Av, of muonium with high preci­ negative results of others2) it appears that the purity sion. Comparison of a precise experimental value is essential. If this is indeed true, it seems quite for Av with the theoretical value would provide a likely that free muonium is lost in a chemical reac­ critical test of electrodynamics involving the muon tion in impure argon.
  • Physics of Muonium and Muonium Oscillations

    Physics of Muonium and Muonium Oscillations

    Physics of muonium and muonium oscillations Alexey A. Petrov1 1Department of Physics and Astronomy Wayne State University, Detroit, MI 48201, USA Precision studies of a muonium, the bound state of a muon and an electron, provide access to physics beyond the Standard Model. We propose that extensive theoretical and experimental studies of atomic physics of a muonium, its decays and muonium-antimuonium oscillations could provide an impact on indirect searches for new physics. An especially clean system to study BSM effects in in the Standard Model at tree level, New Physics degrees lepton sector is muonium Mµ, a QED bound state of a of freedom can effectively compete with the SM parti- positively-charged muon and a negatively-charged elec- cles running in the loop graphs, making their discovery + − tron, jMµi ≡ jµ e i. The main decay channel of the possible. This is, of course, only true provided beyond state is driven by the weak decay of the muon. The av- the Standard Model (BSM) constructions include flavor- erage lifetime of a muonium state τMµ is thus expected violating interactions. In order to probe those we con- to be the same as that of the muon, τµ = (2:1969811 ± sider muonium decays and oscillations. −6 0:0000022) × 10 s [1], apart from the tiny effect due to Denoting the \muon quantum number" by Lµ, FCNC 2 2 2 −10 time dilation, (τMµ −τµ)/τµ = α me=(2mµ) = 6×10 . decays of a muonium would probe ∆Lµ = 1 interactions. Such a lifetime, in principle, is rather long to allow for The effective Lagrangian, L∆Lµ=1, can then be divided precision measurements of muonium's atomic and parti- eff into the dipole part, LD, and a part that involves four- cle physics properties [2].
  • RCED-85-96 DOE's Physics Accelerators

    RCED-85-96 DOE's Physics Accelerators

    DOE’s Physics Accelerators: Their Costs And Benefits This report provides an inventory of the Department of Energy’s existing and planned high-energy physics and nuclear physics accelerator facilities, identifies their as- sociated costs, and presents information on the benefits being derived from their construction and operation. These facilities are the primary tools used by high-energy and nuclear physicists to learn more about what energy and matter consist of and how their component parts or particles are influenced by the most basic natural forces. Of DOE’s $728 million budget for high-energy physics and nuclear physics during fiscal year 1985, about $372.1 million is earmarked for operating 14 DOE-supported accelerator facilities coast-to-coast. DOE’s investment in these facilities amounts to about $1.2 billion. If DOE’s current plans for adding new facilities are carried out, this investment could grow by about $4.3 billion through fiscal year 1994. Annual facility operating costs wilt also grow by about $230 million, or an increase of about 60 percent over current costs. The primary benefits gained from DOE’s investment in these facilities are new scientific knowledge and the education and training of future physicists. Accor- ding to DOE and accelerator facility officials, accelerator particle beams are also used in other scientific applications and have some medical and industrial applications. GAOIRCED-85-96 B APRIL 1,198s 031763 UNITED STATES GENERAL ACCOUNTING OFFICE WASHINGTON, D.C. 20548 RESOURCES, COMMUNlfY, \ND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DIV ISlON B-217863 The Honorable J. Bennett Johnston Ranking Minority Member Subcommittee on Energy and Water Development Committee on Appropriations United States Senate Dear Senator Johnston: This report responds to your request dated November 25, 1984.
  • Study of Nuclear Properties with Muonic Atoms

    Study of Nuclear Properties with Muonic Atoms

    EPJ manuscript No. (will be inserted by the editor) Study of nuclear properties with muonic atoms A. Knecht1a, A. Skawran1;2b, and S. M. Vogiatzi1;2c 1 Paul Scherrer Institut, Villigen, Switzerland 2 Institut f¨urTeilchen- und Astrophysik, ETH Z¨urich, Switzerland Received: date / Revised version: date Abstract. Muons are a fascinating probe to study nuclear properties. Muonic atoms can easily be formed by stopping negative muons inside a material. The muon is subsequently captured by the nucleus and, due to its much higher mass compared to the electron, orbits the nucleus at very small distances. During this atomic capture process the muon emits characteristic X-rays during its cascade down to the ground state. The energies of these X-rays reveal the muonic energy level scheme, from which properties like the nuclear charge radius or its quadrupole moment can be extracted. While almost all stable elements have been examined using muons, probing highly radioactive atoms has so far not been possible. The muX experiment has developed a technique based on transfer reaction inside a high pressure hydrogen/deuterium gas cell to examine targets available only in microgram quantities. PACS. 14.60. Ef Muons { 36.10.Dr Positronium, muonium, muonic atoms and molecules { 32.30.Rj X-ray spectra { 21.10.-k General and average properties of nuclei 1 Introduction Muons are fascinating particles with experiments being conducted in the context of particle, nuclear and atomic physics [1]. Additionally, also applied research is possible by measuring the spin precession and dynamics of muons inside materials through the µSR technique [2] thus probing the internal magnetic fields of the sample under study.
  • The Nuclear Physics of Muon Capture

    The Nuclear Physics of Muon Capture

    Physics Reports 354 (2001) 243–409 The nuclear physics of muon capture D.F. Measday ∗ University of British Columbia, 6224 Agricultural Rd., Vancouver, BC, Canada V6T 1Z1 Received December 2000; editor: G:E: Brown Contents 4.8. Charged particles 330 4.9. Fission 335 1. Introduction 245 5. -ray studies 343 1.1. Prologue 245 5.1. Introduction 343 1.2. General introduction 245 5.2. Silicon-28 350 1.3. Previous reviews 247 5.3. Lithium, beryllium and boron 360 2. Fundamental concepts 248 5.4. Carbon, nitrogen and oxygen 363 2.1. Properties of the muon and neutrino 248 5.5. Fluorine and neon 372 2.2. Weak interactions 253 5.6. Sodium, magnesium, aluminium, 372 3. Muonic atom 264 phosphorus 3.1. Atomic capture 264 5.7. Sulphur, chlorine, and potassium 377 3.2. Muonic cascade 269 5.8. Calcium 379 3.3. Hyperÿne transition 275 5.9. Heavy elements 383 4. Muon capture in nuclei 281 6. Other topics 387 4.1. Hydrogen 282 6.1. Radiative muon capture 387 4.2. Deuterium and tritium 284 6.2. Summary of g determinations 391 4.3. Helium-3 290 P 6.3. The (; e±) reaction 393 4.4. Helium-4 294 7. Summary 395 4.5. Total capture rate 294 Acknowledgements 396 4.6. General features in nuclei 300 References 397 4.7. Neutron production 311 ∗ Tel.: +1-604-822-5098; fax: +1-604-822-5098. E-mail address: [email protected] (D.F. Measday). 0370-1573/01/$ - see front matter c 2001 Published by Elsevier Science B.V.
  • ELEMENTARY PARTICLES in PHYSICS 1 Elementary Particles in Physics S

    ELEMENTARY PARTICLES in PHYSICS 1 Elementary Particles in Physics S

    ELEMENTARY PARTICLES IN PHYSICS 1 Elementary Particles in Physics S. Gasiorowicz and P. Langacker Elementary-particle physics deals with the fundamental constituents of mat- ter and their interactions. In the past several decades an enormous amount of experimental information has been accumulated, and many patterns and sys- tematic features have been observed. Highly successful mathematical theories of the electromagnetic, weak, and strong interactions have been devised and tested. These theories, which are collectively known as the standard model, are almost certainly the correct description of Nature, to first approximation, down to a distance scale 1/1000th the size of the atomic nucleus. There are also spec- ulative but encouraging developments in the attempt to unify these interactions into a simple underlying framework, and even to incorporate quantum gravity in a parameter-free “theory of everything.” In this article we shall attempt to highlight the ways in which information has been organized, and to sketch the outlines of the standard model and its possible extensions. Classification of Particles The particles that have been identified in high-energy experiments fall into dis- tinct classes. There are the leptons (see Electron, Leptons, Neutrino, Muonium), 1 all of which have spin 2 . They may be charged or neutral. The charged lep- tons have electromagnetic as well as weak interactions; the neutral ones only interact weakly. There are three well-defined lepton pairs, the electron (e−) and − the electron neutrino (νe), the muon (µ ) and the muon neutrino (νµ), and the (much heavier) charged lepton, the tau (τ), and its tau neutrino (ντ ). These particles all have antiparticles, in accordance with the predictions of relativistic quantum mechanics (see CPT Theorem).
  • Positronium and Muonium Two Photon Laser Spectroscopy

    Positronium and Muonium Two Photon Laser Spectroscopy

    Positronium and Muonium two photon laser spectroscopy Paolo Crivelli Institute for Particle Physics and Astrophysics, ETH Zurich LEAP 2018- 16th of March 2018 – Paris (France) Leptonic atoms PrecisePrecise test test of of FundamentalFundamental boundbound state state QED QED freefree from from finite finite size size effects effects constantsconstants PositroniumPositronium (Ps) (Ps) MuoniumMuonium (Mu) (Mu) ee- - ee+ + TestTest of of the the fundamental fundamental TestTest the the effect effect of of gravity gravity symmetriessymmetries and and search search onon forfor new new physics physics anti-matteranti-matter See talks Vargas and Moskal See talk A. Soter ApplicationsApplications in in material material TODAY: arXiv:1803.05744 [hep-ex] sciencescience Ps/Mu energy levels Ps Energy levels Mu Energy levels n n 4 4 3S 3P 3D 3S 3P 3D 3 3 3 2 S 1.1 s 2P 3.2 ns 2S 2.2 s 2P 1.6 ns 2 1 2 2 photons transition: 2 photons transition: =486 nm =244 nm Natural linewidth: Natural linewidth: 1.2 MHz 144 kHz 3S 142 ns 1S 2.2 s 1 1 1 Positronium 1S-2S transition S. G. Karshenboim, Phys. Rep. 422, 1 (2005) Theory: νtheory=1233607222.2(6 ) MHz K. Pachucki and S. G. Karshenboim, Phys. Rev. A60, 2792 (1999), K. Melnikov and A. Yelkhovsky, Phys. Lett. B458, 143 (1999)¨. Adkins, Kim, Parsons and Fell, PRL 115 233401 (2015) Experiments: νa=1233607216 .4 (3.2 ) MHz M. S. Fee et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 1397 (1993) S. Chu, A. P. Mills, Jr. and J. Hall, Phys. Rev. Lett. 52,1689 (1984) New measurement ongoing at ETHZ: goal 0.5 MHz 1) Check QED calculations (7m) 2) Stringent test of SME See talk A.Vargas 3) Positron to electron mass ratio Paolo Crivelli Muonium 1S-2S spectroscopy Experiment: Meyer et al.
  • Muonium-Antimuonium Oscillations in Effective Field Theory

    Muonium-Antimuonium Oscillations in Effective Field Theory

    PHYSICAL REVIEW D 102, 095001 (2020) Muonium-antimuonium oscillations in effective field theory Renae Conlin 1 and Alexey A. Petrov 1,2 1Department of Physics and Astronomy Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan 48201, USA 2Leinweber Center for Theoretical Physics University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48196, USA (Received 3 June 2020; accepted 9 October 2020; published 3 November 2020) Flavor violating processes in the lepton sector have highly suppressed branching ratios in the standard model, mainly due to the tiny neutrino mass. This means that observing a lepton flavor violation (LFV) in the next round of experiments would constitute a clear indication of physics beyond the standard model (BSM). We revisit a discussion of one possible way to search for LFV, muonium-antimuonium oscillations. This process violates the muon lepton number by two units and could be sensitive to the types of BSM physics that are not probed by other types of LFV processes. Using techniques of effective field theory, we calculate the mass and width differences of the mass eigenstates of muonium. We argue that its invisible decays give the parametrically leading contribution to the lifetime difference and put constraints on the scales of new physics probed by effective operators in muonium oscillations. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.102.095001 I. INTRODUCTION So far, we have not yet observed FCNC in the charged Flavor-changing neutral current (FCNC) interactions lepton sector. This is because in the standard model with serve as a powerful probe of physics beyond the standard massive neutrinos, the charged lepton flavor violating (CLFV) transitions are suppressed by the powers of model (BSM).