Symposium on Corporate Crime in America

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Symposium on Corporate Crime in America PROCEEDINGS OF THE SECOND SYMPOSIUM ON CRIME AND PUNISHMENT IN THE UNITED STATES Corporate Crime in America: Strengthening the “Good Citizen” Corporation SEPTEMBER 7-8, 1995 WASHINGTON , D.C. Corporate Crime in America: Strengthening the “Good Citizen” Corporation Richard P. Conaboy Chairman Michael S. Gelacak Vice Chairman A. David Mazzone Vice Chairman Wayne A. Budd Commissioner Julie E. Carnes Commissioner Michael Goldsmith Commissioner Deanell R. Tacha Commissioner Mary Frances Harkenrider Ex-officio Edward F. Reilly, Jr. Ex-officio Corporate Crime in America: Strengthening the “Good Citizen” Corporation INTRODUCTION On September 7-8, 1995, approximately 450 people gathered in Washington, D.C., for the U.S. Sentencing Commission’s second symposium on crime and punishment, “Corporate Crime in America: Strengthening the ‘Good Citizen’ Corporation.” The symposium focused on the ways in which companies, industries, and enforcement officials have responded to the organizational sentencing guidelines’ “carrot and stick” incentives and other changes in the enforcement landscape that encourage businesses to develop strong compliance programs and adopt crime-controlling measures. Participants included a wide range of federal enforcement officials, representatives of Fortune 500 as well as smaller corporations, private attorneys and other consultants who advise organizations, and academics who focus on business ethics and crime. The Sentencing Commission sponsored this second symposium on crime and punishment in furtherance of its various authorities to collect and disseminate information on sound sentencing policies and practices (see 28 U.S.C. §§ 991-98). The event was co-chaired by Commissioners Wayne A. Budd and Michael Goldsmith. The organizational sentencing guidelines became effective on November 1, 1991. With a general focus on the organizational guidelines’ policy of tying potential penalties for criminal offenses to the quality of corporate self-policing efforts, the symposium addressed the following issues: 1. corporate experiences in developing “effective” compliance programs; 2. whether the government can (or should) do more to foster “good corporate citizenship”; 3. whether and when compliance practices should be protected from disclosure; 4. new models and proposals for evolving compliance standards; 5. the role of ethics, incentives, and private inspectors general in achieving compliance; 6. whether and how overlapping enforcement schemes can be coordinated more effectively; and 7. the views and experiences of the enforcement community on compliance and related “good corporate citizenship” issues. The first day began with a welcoming address from Judge Richard P. Conaboy, Chairman of the Sentencing Commission, who stated that at the core of the organizational guidelines is the notion that “people committed to high ethical standards and carefully considered policies can, in fact, reduce corporate crime.” He added that he hoped the symposium would “provide a window” on the way in which corporations, industry groups, and iii U.S. Sentencing Commission government enforcement personnel are responding to the organizational sentencing guidelines’ emphasis on compliance programs and other crime-deterring measures. Two presentations followed that provided participants an overview of the organizational guidelines’ operation and goals. L. Russell Burress, the Sentencing Commission’s Principal Training Advisor, and Julie R. O’Sullivan, Associate Professor, Georgetown University Law Center, discussed the operation of the organizational guidelines’ culpability score and other guideline features that combine to provide structured sentencing for organizations. Win Swenson, the Commission’s Deputy General Counsel, then outlined the “carrot and stick” philosophy that underlies the organizational guidelines. This philosophy strongly encourages the establishment and maintenance of effective compliance plans to prevent and detect wrongdoing by providing for substantially reduced penalties for companies that have undertaken these actions but have nevertheless sustained a criminal conviction. The program next turned to the first of 11 topical panels, each led by a moderator who laid out the issues to be addressed by the panel, facilitated the transition and interaction between the speakers, and relayed questions submitted by the audience. (Panel moderators were Jeffrey M. Kaplan of Arkin, Schaffer & Supino, and Commissioner Wayne A. Budd, Mary E. Didier, Marguerite A. Driessen, Donald A. Purdy, and Win Swenson of the Sentencing Commission). The first panel, consisting of Kenneth D. Martin of Sundstrand Corporation, Herbert L. Thornhill of the Bank of Tokyo, and John A. Meyers formerly of Tenet Healthcare Corporation, discussed experiences with compliance programs in the defense and general manufacturing, financial services, and health care industries, respectively. Sundstrand established a government contracts-oriented compliance program in the 1980s after being prosecuted for billing irregularities and at a time when the defense industry generally was instituting compliance-related reforms. When the organizational guidelines were promulgated, Sundstrand expanded its compliance efforts to cover its commercial business and adopted an innovative “responsible executive” program in which an executive with responsibility for a specific compliance area (e.g., antitrust, environment, copyright) reports directly to the highest echelon of the company on a wide range of compliance issues relating to that area. The Bank of Tokyo responded to a climate influenced by the savings and loan crisis and new regulatory demands by instituting an integrated compliance structure based on the sentencing guidelines. After a major government investigation focused on one of its multiple businesses, Tenet Healthcare, formerly National Medical Enterprises, was required to establish costly and demanding compliance practices, some of which might have been avoided had the company been able to establish company-wide the significant compliance measures it had adopted in other sections of the company. The next panel discussed the sharing of “best practices” information within four associations formed in large part for this information-sharing purpose. Members on the panel were Howrey & Simon attorney Alan R. Yuspeh, the coordinator of the Defense Industry Initiative on Business Ethics and Conduct, W. Michael Hoffman of the Ethics Officer Association, Thomas Furtado of United Technologies representing the Ombudsman’s Association, and Anne L. Gill from Sprint who described the Telecommunications Industry Compliance Practices Forum. iv Corporate Crime in America: Strengthening the “Good Citizen” Corporation The first day’s luncheon keynote address was given by Senator Edward M. Kennedy (D-Mass.), one of the principal architects of the Sentencing Reform Act that created the Sentencing Commission. Senator Kennedy discussed how the organizational guidelines brought greater rationality to federal enforcement of corporate crime. This system, he said, had been characterized by “law without order,” with penalties largely dependent on the views of individual judges. He emphasized that corporate crime is not “an overblown, anti-business invention of career-hungry prosecutors, regulators, and politicians,” but is “both serious and distressingly common.” In this regard, he praised the “serious commitment to compliance” that some companies are making. Senator Kennedy added that government enforcement personnel must attempt to understand better what an effective compliance plan entails, and to coordinate criminal, civil, and administrative penalties to make federal policy more effective. He recommended that small businesses be given a fair opportunity to develop effective compliance plans as well. The first afternoon panel presented the results of empirical research on compliance practices – cataloging what compliance practices companies are undertaking and shedding light on the differences between what companies believe they are doing and what employees actually perceive. The first three panelists presented results from Commission-sponsored studies: Andrew R. Apel of the Minnesota Association for Applied Corporate Ethics presented preliminary results from a national study of compliance practices; William S. Laufer of the Wharton School of Business presented the preliminary results of a study of small business compliance practices; and Edward S. Petry of the Center for Business Ethics presented preliminary results from a study of compliance practices in “compliance aware” companies. The remaining two panelists were Rebecca Goodell of Howery & Simon, and Mark Pastin of the Council of Ethical Organizations. These two panelists described, respectively, the Ethics Resource Center’s survey of ethics practices and employee perceptions, and the Council of Ethical Organizations’s study of organizational factors and their effect on compliance. The first day’s program concluded with two breakout sessions. One breakout session was devoted to new models and proposals for compliance standards. Edward A. Dauer, President of the National Center for Preventive Law, discussed his organization’s efforts to develop standards for corporate compliance. James T. Banks, Director of Governmental and Environmental Affairs for WMX Technologies, Inc., presented the compliance plan designed by the Advisory Working Group on Environmental Sanctions. Christopher L. Bell, a member of the U.S. delegation to the
Recommended publications
  • Presidential Documents
    Weekly Compilation of Presidential Documents Monday, October 3, 1994 Volume 30ÐNumber 39 Pages 1835±1915 1 VerDate 14-MAY-98 10:32 May 27, 1998 Jkt 010199 PO 00001 Frm 00001 Fmt 1249 Sfmt 1249 C:\TERRI\P39SE4.000 INET03 Contents Addresses and Remarks Appointments and Nominations See also Bill Signings; Meetings With Foreign Environmental Protection Agency, Deputy Leaders AdministratorÐ1869 Chicago, IL, Democratic Senatorial Campaign National Cancer Advisory Board, membersÐ Committee dinnerÐ1836 1911 Congressional Hispanic Caucus receptionÐ U.S. District Court, judgeÐ1836 1877 Bill Signings New York City Bethel A.M.E. ChurchÐ1851 Departments of Veterans Affairs and Housing Democratic Congressional Campaign and Urban Development, and Independent Committee dinnerÐ1855 Agencies Appropriations Act, 1995, United Nations statementÐ1889 General AssemblyÐ1862 Riegle-Neal Interstate Banking and Branching Luncheon for heads of stateÐ1867 Efficiency Act of 1994, remarksÐ1896 Reception for heads of state and U.N. Communications to Congress delegationsÐ1867 Belarus-U.S. investment treaty, message Radio addressÐ1841 transmittingÐ1836 Receptions for Senate candidates Compact of Free Association With the Alan Wheat in Kansas City, MOÐ1847 Republic of Palau, letterÐ1874 Ann Wynia in Minneapolis, MNÐ1842 General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, Edward M. Kennedy in McLean, VAÐ1902 messageÐ1876 Visit of Russian President Yeltsin Haiti, message transmitting noticeÐ1909 Business leadersÐ1888 Proliferation of chemical and biological ``In the Beginning'' exhibit at the Library of weapons, messageÐ1907 CongressÐ1880 Russian and American veterans of World Communications to Federal Agencies War IIÐ1872 China, memorandumÐ1911 State dinnerÐ1879 Guatemala, memorandumÐ1911 Welcoming ceremonyÐ1869 Haiti, memorandumÐ1910 (Contents Continued on inside of back cover.) WEEKLY COMPILATION OF regulations prescribed by the Administrative Committee of the Federal Register, approved by the President (37 FR 23607; 1 CFR Part 10).
    [Show full text]
  • “What Happened to the Post-War Dream?”: Nostalgia, Trauma, and Affect in British Rock of the 1960S and 1970S by Kathryn B. C
    “What Happened to the Post-War Dream?”: Nostalgia, Trauma, and Affect in British Rock of the 1960s and 1970s by Kathryn B. Cox A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Music Musicology: History) in the University of Michigan 2018 Doctoral Committee: Professor Charles Hiroshi Garrett, Chair Professor James M. Borders Professor Walter T. Everett Professor Jane Fair Fulcher Associate Professor Kali A. K. Israel Kathryn B. Cox [email protected] ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6359-1835 © Kathryn B. Cox 2018 DEDICATION For Charles and Bené S. Cox, whose unwavering faith in me has always shone through, even in the hardest times. The world is a better place because you both are in it. And for Laura Ingram Ellis: as much as I wanted this dissertation to spring forth from my head fully formed, like Athena from Zeus’s forehead, it did not happen that way. It happened one sentence at a time, some more excruciatingly wrought than others, and you were there for every single sentence. So these sentences I have written especially for you, Laura, with my deepest and most profound gratitude. ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Although it sometimes felt like a solitary process, I wrote this dissertation with the help and support of several different people, all of whom I deeply appreciate. First and foremost on this list is Prof. Charles Hiroshi Garrett, whom I learned so much from and whose patience and wisdom helped shape this project. I am very grateful to committee members Prof. James Borders, Prof. Walter Everett, Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • Official Game Information
    Official Game Information Yankee Stadium • One East 161st Street • Bronx, NY 10451 Phone: (718) 579-4460 • E-mail: [email protected] • Twitter: @yankeespr & @losyankeespr World Series Champions: 1923, ’27-28, ’32, ’36-39, ’41, ’43, ’47, ’49-53, ’56, ’58, ’61-62, ’77-78, ’96, ’98-2000, ’09 YANKEES BY THE NUMBERS NOTE 2014 (2013) New YORK Yankees (41-40) vs. TAMPA BAY RAYS (36-49) Standing in AL East: ..............3rd, -2.5 Current Streak: .....................Lost 3 RHP Hiroki Kuroda (5-5, 4.23) vs. LHP David Price (6-7, 3.63) Home Record: .............18-21 (46-35) Road Record:. 23-19 (44-37) Tuesday, July 1, 2014 • Yankee Stadium • 7:05 P.M. ET Day Record: ................15-10 (32-24) Night Record: ..............26-30 (53-53) Game #82 • Home Game #40 • TV: YES • Radio: WFAN 660AM/101.9FM Pre-All-Star .................41-40 (51-44) Post-All-Star ...................0-0 (34-33) vs. AL East: ................. 17-16 (37-39) AT A GLANCE: Tonight the Yankees play the second game of a GEHRIG REMEMBERED: On Wednesday, the vs. AL Central: ................ 4-6 (22-11) three-game series vs. Tampa Bay… are 1-3 thus far on their six- Yankees will commemorate the 75th anniversary vs. AL West: ................ 10-11 (17-16) vs. National League: ..........10-7 (9-11) game homestand (are 0-1 vs. the Rays and went 1-2 vs. Boston of Lou Gehrig’s “Luckiest Man” speech (the team is vs. RH starters: ............. 27-27 (53-54) over the weekend)… beginning on Thursday, embark on an on the road on Friday at Minnesota on the actual vs.
    [Show full text]
  • Criminal Redistribution of Stolen Property: the Need for Law Reform
    Michigan Law Review Volume 74 Issue 8 1976 Criminal Redistribution of Stolen Property: The Need for Law Reform G. Robert Blakey Cornell Law School Michael Goldsmith Vermont State Attorneys' Office Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mlr Part of the Criminal Law Commons Recommended Citation G. R. Blakey & Michael Goldsmith, Criminal Redistribution of Stolen Property: The Need for Law Reform, 74 MICH. L. REV. 1511 (1976). Available at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mlr/vol74/iss8/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Michigan Law Review at University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Michigan Law Review by an authorized editor of University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CRIMINAL REDISTRIBUTION OF STOLEN PROPERTY: THE NEED FOR LAW REFORM G. Robert Blakey and Michael Goldsmith TABLE OF CONTENTS I. THE REALITIES OF MODERN FENCING SYSTEMS ___ 1523 A. Marketing Theory and the Fence ______ 1523 B. Patterns of Redistribution _________ 1528 l. The "Neighborhood Connection" _____ 1529 2. The Outlet Fence ______ 1531 3. The Professional Fence ________ 1533 4. The Master Fence __________ 1535 5. The Role of Organz"zed Crime _____ 1538 Il. SoCIAL CONTROL THROUGH LAW ____ 1542 A. Crimz"nal Sanctions _________ 1542 l. The Development of the Law ______ 1542 2. Receiving Stolen Property: A Modern Perspective ______ 1545 a. The "receipt'' of property _____ 1545 b. The goods must be stolen ---------------- 1551 c. The state of mz"nd requz"rement ----------·--------- 1558 (i).
    [Show full text]
  • Michael Goldsmith
    BYU Law Review Volume 2010 Issue 2 Article 2 5-1-2010 Michael Goldsmith Frederick Mark Gedicks Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.byu.edu/lawreview Part of the Legal Biography Commons Recommended Citation Frederick Mark Gedicks, �������������� ������������������, 2010 BYU L. Rᴇᴠ. 339. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Brigham Young University Law Review at BYU Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in BYU Law Review by an authorized editor of BYU Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. DO NOT DELETE 4/12/2010 2:52 PM Michael Goldsmith Frederick Mark Gedicks The most fitting way to begin an essay in memory of Michael Goldsmith would be to tell one of his jokes, because Michael had a terrific sense of humor. The trouble is that, as I thought of all of the jokes that Michael had told me over the many years that we knew each other, I couldn’t actually remember one that I could safely tell in public, let alone in print. He did send a lot of them through his BYU Law School email account, however, so it makes me smile to think that somewhere in the vast reaches of the BYU server, these jokes are sitting there, like time bombs waiting to go off, which is its own kind of joke. The first and by far the most important thing to remember about Michael was his love and care for his family. Two of his sisters spoke at the funeral service in Albany, and it was immediately evident how much they loved their brother, and how good he had been to them and to their mother.
    [Show full text]
  • The Supreme Court and Title Iii: Rewriting the Law of Electronic Surveillance
    Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology Volume 74 Article 1 Issue 1 Spring Spring 1983 The uprS eme Court and Title III: Rewriting the Law of Electronic Surveillance Michael Goldsmith Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/jclc Part of the Criminal Law Commons, Criminology Commons, and the Criminology and Criminal Justice Commons Recommended Citation Michael Goldsmith, The uS preme Court and Title III: Rewriting the Law of Electronic Surveillance, 74 J. Crim. L. & Criminology 1 (1983) This Criminal Law is brought to you for free and open access by Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology by an authorized editor of Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. 0091-4169/83/7401-1 THE JOURNAL OF CRIMINAL LAW & CRIMINOLOGY . Vol. 74, No. I Copyright © 1983 by Northwestern University School of Law P'ntdin USA. THE SUPREME COURT AND TITLE III: REWRITING THE LAW OF ELECTRONIC SURVEILLANCE MICHAEL GOLDSMITH* I. INTRODUCTION .............................................. 3 II. HISTORICAL ORIGINS OF TITLE III ...................... 7 A. THE ORIGINAL CONSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK: OLMSTEAD AND ITS EARLY PROGENY ................ 7 B. THE FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS ACT OF 1934: STATUTORY PRECURSOR TO TITLE III ................ 10 C. THE REVISED CONSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK ........ 13 1. PreliminaqModifiations ........................... 13 2. Berger v. New York and Katz v. United States... 21 III. LEGISLATIVE DESIGN ........................................ 32 A. THE CONTEXT OF REFORM ............................ 32 B. THE MECHANICS OF REFORM .......................... 38 C. TITLE III STANDARDS ................................... 39 1. Prohibitionsand Sanctions .......................... 39 2. Prerequisitesto Lawful Surveillance .................. 41 a. Jurisdictional requirements ................... 41 b. Documentary requirements .................. 42 * Assistant Professor of Law, Vanderbilt Law School.
    [Show full text]
  • Tax Representatives and Practitioners Program
    THE CITY OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE BILL DE BLASIO, MAYOR JACQUES JIHA, COMMISSIONER TAX REPRESENTATIVES AND PRACTITIONERS PROGRAM OCTOBER 19, 2015 Fair, Efficient, Transparent, Exceptional Customer Service 2 Taxpayer Representatives and Practitioners Program (TAXRAPP) New York Athletic Club 180 Central Park South New York, NY 10019 Monday, October 19, 2015 Event Program 7:30 - 8:30 REGISTRATION AND CONTINENTAL BREAKFAST 8:30 - 9:00 WELCOME AND INTRODUCTIONS Jacques Jiha, Ph.D., Commissioner New York City Department of Finance Jerry Boone, Commissioner New York State Department of Taxation and Finance 9:00 - 9:50 TRANSPARENCY IN THE AUDIT PROCESS The Department of Finance has undergone a significant shift toward a more transparent business model that makes tax-related information and data, Agency budgeting and spending publicly available to New York City residents. For tax practitioners, that means making sure that our rules, policies, and statements of audit procedure and other written policies are clear and easy to understand. Our goal is to become more transparent in all of our business practices. This panel outlines the major steps we’ve implemented, and provides an overview of our ongoing initiatives. Moderator: Richard Genetelli, President The Genetelli Consulting Group Panelists: Harry Leonard, Esq., Deputy Commissioner, Tax Audit & Enforcement New York City Department of Finance Diana Beinart, Esq., Deputy Commissioner and General Counsel New York City Department of Finance 3 Cesar Bencosme, Assistant Commissioner, Tax Audit New York City Department of Finance 9:55 - 10:50 NEW YORK CITY CORPORATE TAX REFORM: AN ESSENTIAL PRIMER FOR TAX PRACTITIONERS New York City’s Corporate Income Tax has been significantly reformed and is in effect for tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2015.
    [Show full text]
  • Transnational Punk: the Growing Push for Global Change Through a Music-Based Subculture Alexander Lalama Claremont Graduate University, [email protected]
    LUX: A Journal of Transdisciplinary Writing and Research from Claremont Graduate University Volume 3 | Issue 1 Article 9 2013 Transnational Punk: The Growing Push for Global Change Through a Music-Based Subculture Alexander Lalama Claremont Graduate University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.claremont.edu/lux Part of the Other Arts and Humanities Commons Recommended Citation Lalama, Alexander (2013) "Transnational Punk: The Growing Push for Global Change Through a Music-Based Subculture," LUX: A Journal of Transdisciplinary Writing and Research from Claremont Graduate University: Vol. 3: Iss. 1, Article 9. Available at: http://scholarship.claremont.edu/lux/vol3/iss1/9 Lalama: Transnational Punk Lalama 1 Transnational Punk: The Growing Push for Global Change Through a Music-Based Subculture Alexander Lalama, M.A. Claremont Graduate University School of Arts and Humanities Department of English Abstract Little media attention has been devoted to the burgeoning punk scene that has raised alarm abroad in areas such as Banda Aceh, Indonesia and Moscow, Russia. While the punk subculture has been analyzed in-depth by such notable theorists as Dick Hebdige and Stuart Hall, their work has been limited to examining the rise and apparent decline of the subculture in England, rendering any further investigations into punk as looking back at a nostalgic novelty of post- World War II British milieu. Furthermore, the commodification of punk music and style has relegated punk to the realm of an alternative culture in Britain and locally in the U.S. In these current international incarnations, however, a social space for this alternative culture is threatened by severe punishment including what Indonesian police officials have label “moral rehabilitation” and, in the case of Russian punks, imprisonment.
    [Show full text]
  • Xerox University Microfilms
    INFORMATION TO USERS This material was produced from a microfilm copy of the original document. While the most advanced technological means to photograph and reproduce this document have been used, the quality is heavily dependent upon the quality of the original submitted. The following explanation of techniques is provided to help you understand markings or patterns which may appear on this reproduction. 1. The sign or "target" for pages apparently lacking from the document photographed is "Missing Page(s)". If it was possible to obtain the missing page(s) or section, they are spliced into the film along with adjacent pages. This may have necessitated cutting thru an image and duplicating adjacent pages to insure you complete continuity. 2. When an image on the film is obliterated with a large round black mark, it is an indication that the photographer suspected that the copy may have moved during exposure and thus cause a blurred image. You will find a good image of the page in the adjacent frame. 3. When a map, drawing or chart, etc., was part of the material being photographed the photographer followed a definite method in "sectioning" the material. It is customary to begin photoing at the upper left hand corner of a large sheet and to continue photoing from left to right in equal sections with a small overlap. If necessary, sectioning is continued again — beginning below the first row and continuing on until complete. 4. The majority of users indicate that the textual content is of greatest value, however, a somewhat higher quality reproduction could be made from "photographs" if essential to the understanding of the dissertation.
    [Show full text]
  • Fictional Worlds and Characters in Art-Making: Fook Island As Exemplar for Art Practice
    COPYRIGHT AND CITATION CONSIDERATIONS FOR THIS THESIS/ DISSERTATION o Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use. o NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes. o ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original. How to cite this thesis Surname, Initial(s). (2012) Title of the thesis or dissertation. PhD. (Chemistry)/ M.Sc. (Physics)/ M.A. (Philosophy)/M.Com. (Finance) etc. [Unpublished]: University of Johannesburg. Retrieved from: https://ujcontent.uj.ac.za/vital/access/manager/Index?site_name=Research%20Output (Accessed: Date). Fictional worlds and characters in art-making: Fook Island as exemplar for art practice by Allen Walter Laing Dissertation submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree Magister Technologiae: Fine Art In the Department of Visual Art Faculty of Art, Design and Architecture University of Johannesburg 8 October 2018 Supervisor: David Paton Co-supervisor: Prof. Brenda Schmahmann The financial assistance of the National Research Foundation (NRF) towards this research is hereby acknowledged. Opinions expressed and conclusions arrived at, are those of the author and are not necessarily to be attributed to the NRF. Declaration I hereby declare that the dissertation, which I herewith submit for the research qualification Master of Technology: Fine Art to the University of Johannesburg is, apart from recognised assistance, my own work and has not previously been submitted by me to another institution to obtain a research diploma or degree.
    [Show full text]
  • Ananda Devi's Narrative Strategies and Subversions. Ritu Tyagi Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 2009 Ananda Devi's Narrative Strategies and Subversions. Ritu Tyagi Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations Part of the French and Francophone Language and Literature Commons Recommended Citation Tyagi, Ritu, "Ananda Devi's Narrative Strategies and Subversions." (2009). LSU Doctoral Dissertations. 3561. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations/3561 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please [email protected]. ANANDA DEVI’S NARRATIVE STRATEGIES AND SUBVERSIONS A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The Department of French Studies by Ritu Tyagi B.A., Jawaharlal Nehru University, 1999 M.A., University of California Irvine, 2003 May 2009 ©Copyright 2009 Ritu Tyagi All rights reserved ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The completion of this dissertation and doctoral degree would not have been possible without the help and support of many individuals. I would like to express my profound gratitude to my dissertation director, Dr. Jack Yeager, for his stimulating suggestions and encouragement. His pleasant smile, optimism, and positivity helped me sail through the most frustrating and depressing moments. My thanks also go to the members of my committee for their support: Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Prism Vol 5 No 3.Pdf
    PRISM VOL. 5, NO. 3 2015 A JOURNAL OF THE CENTER FOR COMPLEX OPERATIONS PRISM About VOL. 5, NO. 3 2015 PRISM is published by the Center for Complex Operations. PRISM is a security studies journal chartered to inform members of U.S. Federal agencies, allies, and other partners on complex EDITOR and integrated national security operations; reconstruction and state-building; relevant policy Michael Miklaucic and strategy; lessons learned; and developments in training and education to transform America’s security and development EDITORIAL ASSISTANTS Connor Christenson Talley Lattimore Jeffrey Listerman Communications Giorgio Rajao Constructive comments and contributions are important to us. Direct Hiram Reynolds communications to: COPY EDITORS Editor, PRISM Dale Erickson 260 Fifth Avenue (Building 64, Room 3605) Rebecca Harper Fort Lesley J. McNair Christoff Luehrs Washington, DC 20319 Nathan White Telephone: (202) 685-3442 DESIGN DIRecTOR FAX: Carib Mendez (202) 685-3581 Email: [email protected] ADVISORY BOARD Dr. Gordon Adams Dr. Pauline H. Baker Ambassador Rick Barton Contributions Professor Alain Bauer PRISM welcomes submission of scholarly, independent research from security policymakers Dr. Joseph J. Collins (ex officio) and shapers, security analysts, academic specialists, and civilians from the United States and Ambassador James F. Dobbins abroad. Submit articles for consideration to the address above or by email to [email protected] Ambassador John E. Herbst (ex officio) with “Attention Submissions Editor” in the subject line. Dr. David Kilcullen Ambassador Jacques Paul Klein Dr. Roger B. Myerson This is the authoritative, official U.S. Department of Defense edition of PRISM. Dr. Moisés Naím Any copyrighted portions of this journal may not be reproduced or extracted MG William L.
    [Show full text]