DOCSLIB.ORG

North Carolina's First Railroads, a Study in Historical Geography

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
North Carolina's First Railroads, a Study in Historical Geography BURKE, JAMES C., Ph.D. North Carolina’s First Railroads, A Study in Historical Geography. (2008) Directed by Dr. Jeffrey C. Patton. 438 pp. Part One of this study is a historical narrative that addresses the political, economic, and technological factors associated with the building of the first railroads in North Carolina, and their relationship to the railroad in Virginia. Both the Raleigh & Gaston Rail Road and the Wilmington & Raleigh Rail Road were completed in 1840. The latter did not run to Raleigh, as was the original intention when it was incorporated in 1833, but rather it terminated near the Weldon Toll Bridge on the Roanoke River where it connected to the Portsmouth & Roanoke Rail Road. The Raleigh & Gaston Rail Road, incorporated in 1835, connected to the Greensville & Roanoke Rail Road, a branch line of the Petersburg Rail Road, by its own bridge over the Roanoke approximately twelve miles west of Weldon. The two North Carolina railroads lacked the benefit of a connection that would bring them into a network. This part of the study concludes with the assessment that trade competition between the commercial centers of Norfolk and Petersburg adversely influenced early railroad development in North Carolina. Part Two of this study presents two spatial hypotheses. The first advances the position that early railroad development in North Carolina would mirror railroad development in southern Virginia to form an alignment of commercial centers north-to-south rather than east-to-west within physiographic regions. The second hypothesis suggests that the early railroads in North Carolina could have intersected north-to-south and east-to-west to form a productive network across physiographic regions. Of the many railroads proposed in North Carolina during the 1830s, the Waynesborough and Raleigh route seems the most likely component of an alternative network that would support the second hypothesis, if its practicality can be demonstrated by a plausible model. The empirical model prepared for this study replicates the conventions of a period railroad survey utilizing modern geographic tools and resources. The analysis of the resulting estimate supports the proposition that this railroad could have been built at that time had the interests in Raleigh and Wilmington agreed to one railroad to the Roanoke. The viability of other options suggests the possible that the rail network in North Carolina could have evolved differently under the same conditions. NORTH CAROLINA’S FIRST RAILROADS, A STUDY IN HISTORICAL GEOGRAPHY by James C. Burke A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of The Graduate School at The University of North Carolina at Greensboro in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy Greensboro 2008 Approved by ____________________________ Committee Chair In Memory of My Mother, Anne Rhodes Burke ii APPROVAL PAGE This dissertation has been approved by the following committee of the Faculty of The Graduate School of The University of North Carolina at Greensboro. Committee Chair ____________________________________ Committee Members ____________________________________ ____________________________________ ____________________________________ ____________________________________ ____________________________ Date of Acceptance by Committee ____________________________ Date of Final Oral Examination iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Dr. Maureen Basedow, an archaeology professor at the University of North Carolina at Wilmington, initiated my research on the early railroads of North Carolina by suggesting that I map the surviving structures of the site of the railroad complex at Wilmington and provide the general dates of their construction. This was a particularly attractive assignment for the reason that my father, Edmund E. Burke, had frequently taken me to the facility as a child during the twilight years of its operation; and as an undergraduate in the 1970s, I had frequented the site before most of its structures had been demolished. After completing this assignment, I had a strong desire to continue the research. Under the guidance of Dr. W. Frank Ainsley of the Earth Sciences department at UNC- Wilmington, I began preparing a survey of the existing railroad-related structures and architecture along the 161½ miles of the route of the Wilmington & Weldon Railroad. Dr. Ainsley has maintained an unflagging interest in my research since that time, and I am honored the he chose to serve as the outside member of my dissertation committee. Upon entering the Historic Preservation program at the University of North Carolina at Greensboro in 2002, Dr. Jo Ramsay Leimenstoll encouraged me to continue my research by exploring the relationship between railroad development in Eastern North Carolina and the diffusion of stylistic innovations in domestic architecture within the rail corridor. This research served as a foundation for preparing several chapters and appendices presented here. iv In 2004, I was granted the privilege of being accepted into the Ph.D. Program in the Department of Geography at UNC-Greensboro, where I encountered a faculty that led me to expand the scope of my research to embrace the many spatial aspects of the topic. I begin by thanking my committee. Dr. Elizabeth Nelson devoted a considerable portion of her time to reviewing the maps in my dissertation, and offering her editorial skills to its final preparation. Dr. Zhi-Jun Liu introduced me to the area of GIS programming, and rekindled my interest in mathematics. Dr. Phillip Royall encouraged me to expand my inquiry into the realm of physical geography, a direction that had a profound influence upon the changing of my original research design. Dr. Jeffery Patton served as chairman of my dissertation, and I greatly appreciate the many enlightening four-hour meetings he set aside to discuss the many drafts of my work, and provide sound advice from the preparation of my research design to the completion of the dissertation. Other member of the faculty not connected with my dissertation offered useful input, including Dr. Gordon Bennett, Dr. Selima Sultana, and Dr. Keith Debbage. I am grateful to the department for securing an assistantship and tuition wavier in 2007. Many individuals and institutions have aided my research over the years. I would like to express my thanks to Donna Kelly in the Historical Publications Section of the Division of Historical Resources in the Office of Archives and History in Raleigh that facilitated permission to use maps from North Carolina in Maps by W.P. Cumming. Beverly Tetterton and Joseph Sheppard of the New Hanover County Library provided copies of useful maps, and most of stockholder reports of the Wilmington & Weldon Rail Road Company referenced in this study. Sadie Hood and the staff of the Wilmington v Railroad Museum gave me unlimited access to their archives and collection of artifacts. Through their assistance, I gained insight into the early railroad technology and the day- to-day operation of the Wilmington & Raleigh Rail Road. I appreciate the assistance of Habte M. Teclemariam, Senior Reference Librarian of the Geography and Map Division of The Library of Congress in locating Hamilton Fulton’s Plan of Croatan and Roanoke Sounds, a copy of which is included herein. I also acknowledge the assistance of Traci Thompson of the Braswell Library, Elaine Sandberg of the South Carolina State Library, Molley French of the Charleston County Public Library, Rhonda Koenig of the Wayne County Public Library, the staff of the North Carolina State Archives, the staff and volunteers at the North Carolina Transport Museum at Spencer, and the staff of the Richmond Public Library. F. Donald Hickman applied his skills to the grueling task of proofing multiple drafts of this work, along with offering valuable editorial criticism, encouragement, and sound advice in dealing with the less pleasant moments of this endeavor. I appreciate his tireless work, often proofing different versions of the same chapter many times over. Cynthia A. Johnson assisted me with field study, and several of her photographs appear as figures in the present volume. I am appreciative of the generosity of Gregg Turner for sending a copy of his book A short History of Florida Railroads, to Bob Cooke of the Civil War Roundtable for sharing copies of his articles on the history of the Wilmington & Weldon Railroad during the Civil War, and to Dr. Doug Rader, who shared his research on the deeds of the Slocomb Plantation in Dudley, North Carolina. My conversations with George Savage of Tarboro enhanced my understanding of the vi transportation and economy of rural Edgecombe County during the late 19th and early 20th century. Trillian Hosticka offered her skills in proofing early drafts of two chapters of this work. I feel fortunate to have had the benefit of support from my friends and family including John E. Best, Mary Hall-Brown, Edmund Burke, Patrick Burke, Robert Burke, Ernesto Ferreri, Victor Galloway, Donald Hickman, Almira Johnson, Cynthia A. Johnson, Clyde Rollins Sr., Clyde Rollins, Jr., the late Elizabeth Rollins, Dr. Michael Wentworth, Roberta Williams, Chanda Wynne, and the late Dr. John L. Zintsmaster, vii PREFACE Throughout the preparation of this work, the author considered several different approaches to organizing its content. Ordinarily, empirical studies in geography follow the traditional form of introduction of the hypotheses, a review of the literature, a description of the research methodology, analysis of the acquired
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Tacci7 Centuries
    North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources State Historic Preservation Office David L. S. Brook, Administrator Michael F. Easley, Governor Division of Archives and History Lisbeth C. Evans, Secretary Jeffrey J. Crow, Director June 12, 2001 MEMORANDUM To: William Gilmore Project Development & Environmental Analysis, NCDOT From: David Brook Ple___1:51,-Stur.A.Cinc)clz_ Re: Improve NC 24 from 2.8 miles east of 1-95 to 1-40, R-2303, Multi County, ER 01-9171 Thank you for your letter of May 4, 2000, transmitting the survey report addendum by Marvin A. Brown for the above project. We apologize for the delay in our response. The report addendum is eloquently written and meets our office's guidelines and those of the Secretary of the Interior. For purposes of compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act, we concur that the following property is eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places under .the criterion cited: Stedman Historic District under Criteria A and C as an intact example of a rural Cumberland County town that arose, along with a railroad line and depot, in the late nineteenth and early twentieth tacCI7 centuries. The boundaries shown are appropriate. oc' There are two additions to the report which would be helpful to the reader and ensure that the report, as outlined in our guidelines, serves as a stand-alone document. These are the addition of a map that shows the relationship of the Stedman Historic District to the area of potential effect for the improvement of NC 24 and the former rail lines' being shown on Figure 2.
    [Show full text]
  • North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources State Historic Preservation Office David L
    North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources State Historic Preservation Office David L. S. Brook. Administrator Michael F. Easley, Governor Division of Historical Resources Lisbeth C. Evans, Secretary David J. Olson, Director Jeffrey J. Crow, Deputy Secretary May 23, 2003 MEMORANDUM TO: Greg Thorpe, Manager Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch NCDOT Division of Highways FROM: David Brook SUBJECT: Flistoric/Architectural Resources Survey Report, Widen US 221 from SR 1536 in Rutherford County to 1-40 in McDowell County, R-2597, Rutherford and McDowell Counties, CH02-10510 Thank you for your letter of April 29, 2003, transmitting the survey report by Frances P. Alexander of Mattson, Alexander and Associates. For purposes of compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act, we concur that the following properties are eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places under the criterion cited: William Monteith House, Gilkey, Rutherford County Albert Weaver Farm, Thermal City, Rutherford County B. G. Hensley House, Glenwood vicinity, McDowell County ; The William Monteirkliouse, west side of US 221, 0.1 mile north of SR 1351, Gilkey, RutherfasnaCounty,is-eligible,for the National Register ,under Criterion C for architecture. The Monteith _House is an especially fine expression of the Queen Anne style in Rutherford County-,.. We concur with the proposed National Register boundaries as described and delMeated.in the report. - The Albert Weaver Farm, west side of SR 1321-, 0.1 mile west of, US 221; Thermal City, Rutherford County, is eligible for the National Register underCriterion A for agriculture and Criterion C for .architecture-. The farmhouse and its collection of intact and in-place .
    [Show full text]
  • 1835. EXECUTIVE. *L POST OFFICE DEPARTMENT
    1835. EXECUTIVE. *l POST OFFICE DEPARTMENT. Persons employed in the General Post Office, with the annual compensation of each. Where Compen­ Names. Offices. Born. sation. Dol. cts. Amos Kendall..., Postmaster General.... Mass. 6000 00 Charles K. Gardner Ass't P. M. Gen. 1st Div. N. Jersey250 0 00 SelahR. Hobbie.. Ass't P. M. Gen. 2d Div. N. York. 2500 00 P. S. Loughborough Chief Clerk Kentucky 1700 00 Robert Johnson. ., Accountant, 3d Division Penn 1400 00 CLERKS. Thomas B. Dyer... Principal Book Keeper Maryland 1400 00 Joseph W. Hand... Solicitor Conn 1400 00 John Suter Principal Pay Clerk. Maryland 1400 00 John McLeod Register's Office Scotland. 1200 00 William G. Eliot.. .Chie f Examiner Mass 1200 00 Michael T. Simpson Sup't Dead Letter OfficePen n 1200 00 David Saunders Chief Register Virginia.. 1200 00 Arthur Nelson Principal Clerk, N. Div.Marylan d 1200 00 Richard Dement Second Book Keeper.. do.. 1200 00 Josiah F.Caldwell.. Register's Office N. Jersey 1200 00 George L. Douglass Principal Clerk, S. Div.Kentucky -1200 00 Nicholas Tastet Bank Accountant Spain. 1200 00 Thomas Arbuckle.. Register's Office Ireland 1100 00 Samuel Fitzhugh.., do Maryland 1000 00 Wm. C,Lipscomb. do : for) Virginia. 1000 00 Thos. B. Addison. f Record Clerk con-> Maryland 1000 00 < routes and v....) Matthias Ross f. tracts, N. Div, N. Jersey1000 00 David Koones Dead Letter Office Maryland 1000 00 Presley Simpson... Examiner's Office Virginia- 1000 00 Grafton D. Hanson. Solicitor's Office.. Maryland 1000 00 Walter D. Addison. Recorder, Div. of Acc'ts do..
    [Show full text]
  • THE PRICE of BONDAGE: SLAVERY, SLAVE VALUATION, and ECONOMICS in the ALBEMARLE by Jacob T. Parks April 2018 Director of Thesis
    THE PRICE OF BONDAGE: SLAVERY, SLAVE VALUATION, AND ECONOMICS IN THE ALBEMARLE By Jacob T. Parks April 2018 Director of Thesis: Donald H. Parkerson Major Department: History This thesis examines the economics of antebellum slavery in the Albemarle region of North Carolina. Located in the northeastern corner of the Carolina colony, the Albemarle was a harsh location for settlement and thus, inhabitants settled relatively late by Virginians moving south in search of better opportunities. This thesis finds that examination of a region’s slave economics not only conformed to, but also departed from, the larger slave experience in antebellum America. The introduction of this thesis focuses on the literature surrounding slave economics and valuation in antebellum America. After this, the main body of the thesis follows. Chapter one focuses on the various avenues slaves became property of white men and women in the Albemarle. This reveals that the county courts were intrinsically involved in allowing slave sales to occur, in addition to loop-holes slave owners utilized to retain chattel slavery cheaply. Additionally, this chapter pays special attention to slave valuation and statistical analysis. The following chapters revolve around the topics of: the miscellaneous costs associated with slavery in the Albemarle, such as healthcare, food, and clothing; insuring the lives of slaves and hiring them out for work away from their master; and examination of runaway slave rewards in statistical terms, while also creating a narrative of the enslaved and their actions. THE PRICE OF BONDAGE: SLAVERY, SLAVE VALUATION, AND ECONOMICS IN THE ALBEMARLE A Thesis Presented To the Faculty of the Department of History East Carolina University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in History by Jacob Parks April 2018 © Jacob Parks, 2018 THE PRICE OF BONDAGE: SLAVERY, SLAVE VALUATION, AND ECONOMICS IN THE ALBEMARLE by Jacob T.
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliography of North Carolina Underwater Archaeology
    i BIBLIOGRAPHY OF NORTH CAROLINA UNDERWATER ARCHAEOLOGY Compiled by Barbara Lynn Brooks, Ann M. Merriman, Madeline P. Spencer, and Mark Wilde-Ramsing Underwater Archaeology Branch North Carolina Division of Archives and History April 2009 ii FOREWARD In the forty-five years since the salvage of the Modern Greece, an event that marks the beginning of underwater archaeology in North Carolina, there has been a steady growth in efforts to document the state’s maritime history through underwater research. Nearly two dozen professionals and technicians are now employed at the North Carolina Underwater Archaeology Branch (N.C. UAB), the North Carolina Maritime Museum (NCMM), the Wilmington District U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (COE), and East Carolina University’s (ECU) Program in Maritime Studies. Several North Carolina companies are currently involved in conducting underwater archaeological surveys, site assessments, and excavations for environmental review purposes and a number of individuals and groups are conducting ship search and recovery operations under the UAB permit system. The results of these activities can be found in the pages that follow. They contain report references for all projects involving the location and documentation of physical remains pertaining to cultural activities within North Carolina waters. Each reference is organized by the location within which the reported investigation took place. The Bibliography is divided into two geographical sections: Region and Body of Water. The Region section encompasses studies that are non-specific and cover broad areas or areas lying outside the state's three-mile limit, for example Cape Hatteras Area. The Body of Water section contains references organized by defined geographic areas.
    [Show full text]
  • A Contribution Towards a Vascular Flora of the Great Dismal Swamp
    - i -. A Contribution towards a Vascular Flora of the Great Dismal Swamp LYTTON J. MUSSELMAN, DANIEL L. NICKRENT, AND GERALD F. LEVY r Reprinted from RHODORA, Vol. 79, No. 818, April 1977 pages 240-268 - A CONTRIBUTION TOW ARDS A VASCULAR FLORA OF THE GREAT DISMAL SWAMP LYTTON J. MUSSELMAN, DANIELL. NICKRENT,1 AND GERALD F. LEVY This flora is an enumeration of the vascular plants growing without cultivation in the Great Dismal Swamp. It is hoped that this work will be of value to the rapidly increasing number of persons visiting the swamp, particularly since the establishment of the Dismal Swamp National Wildlife Refuge in 1973. Great pains have been taken to ensure completeness of the inventory presented here. Yet, the Dismal Swamp is difficult to botanize, and additional species will undoubtedly be added to the present list. Previous botanical work in the swamp is listed in Kirk et al. (in press). LOCATION AND EXTENT OF AREA The Great Dismal Swamp, which occupies about 104,000 ha. of North Carolina and Virginia (Figure 1), is one of the largest remaining swamp forests on the Coastal Plain. Although the swamp is considered to be centered around Lake Drummond in the Virginia cities of Suffolk and Chesapeake, it extends into the North Carolina counties of Currituck, Camden, Perquimans, Gates, and Pasquotank. Except for the western edge, which is delimited by the Suffolk Escarpment (Henry, 1970), the boundaries of the swamp are not sharply defined. TOPOGRAPHY AND DRAINAGE The Dismal Swamp is situated on a low, poorly drained flat marine terrace which ranges from 4.5 to 7 m.
    [Show full text]
  • The History of the College of William and Mary from Its Foundation, 1693
    1693 - 1870 m 1m mmtm m m m&NBm iKMi Sam On,•'.;:'.. m '' IIP -.•. m : . UBS . mm W3m BBSshsR iillltwlll ass I HHH1 m '. • ml §88 BmHRSSranH M£$ Sara ,mm. mam %£kff EARL GREGG SWEM LIBRARY THE COLLEGE OF WILLIAM AND MARY IN VIRGINIA Presented By Dorothy Dickinson PIPPEN'S a BOOI^ a g OllD STORE, 5j S) 60S N. Eutaw St. a. BALT WORE. BOOES EOUOE' j ESCHANQED. 31 Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2011 with funding from LYRASIS Members and Sloan Foundation http://www.archive.org/details/historyofcollege1870coll 0\JI.LCkj£ THE HISTORY College of William and Mary From its Foundation, 1693, to 1870. BALTIMOKE: Printed by John Murphy & Co. Publishers, Booksellers, Printers and Stationers, 182 Baltimore Street. 1870. Oath of Visitor, I. A. B., do golemnly promise and swear, that I will truly and faith- fully execute the duties of my office, as a vistor of William and Mary College, according to the best of my skill and judgment, without favour, affection or partiality. So help me God. Oath of President or Professor. I, do swear, that I will well and truly execute the duties of my office of according to the best of my ability. So help me God. THE CHARTER OF THE College of William and Mary, In Virginia. WILLIAM AND MARY, by the grace of God, of England, Scot- land, France and Ireland, King and Queen, defenders of the faith, &c. To all to whom these our present letters shall come, greeting. Forasmuch as our well-beloved and faithful subjects, constituting the General Assembly of our Colony of Virginia, have had it in their minds, and have proposed
    [Show full text]
  • Transportation Planning for the Richmond–Charlotte Railroad Corridor
    VOLUME I Executive Summary and Main Report Technical Monograph: Transportation Planning for the Richmond–Charlotte Railroad Corridor Federal Railroad Administration United States Department of Transportation January 2004 Disclaimer: This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the Department of Transportation solely in the interest of information exchange. The United States Government assumes no liability for the contents or use thereof, nor does it express any opinion whatsoever on the merit or desirability of the project(s) described herein. The United States Government does not endorse products or manufacturers. Any trade or manufacturers' names appear herein solely because they are considered essential to the object of this report. Note: In an effort to better inform the public, this document contains references to a number of Internet web sites. Web site locations change rapidly and, while every effort has been made to verify the accuracy of these references as of the date of publication, the references may prove to be invalid in the future. Should an FRA document prove difficult to find, readers should access the FRA web site (www.fra.dot.gov) and search by the document’s title or subject. 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. FRA/RDV-04/02 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date January 2004 Technical Monograph: Transportation Planning for the Richmond–Charlotte Railroad Corridor⎯Volume I 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Authors: 8. Performing Organization Report No. For the engineering contractor: Michael C. Holowaty, Project Manager For the sponsoring agency: Richard U. Cogswell and Neil E. Moyer 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10.
    [Show full text]
  • Springfield Railroad Underpass Project Hampshire County State Project # S314-SBV-RR-6.50 Federal Project # N/A FR#: 15-479-HM
    Springfield Railroad Underpass Project Hampshire County State Project # S314-SBV-RR-6.50 Federal Project # N/A FR#: 15-479-HM HISTORIC DOCUMENTATION July 2015 West Virginia Department of Transportation Division of Highways Engineering Division Environmental Section (304) 558-2885 HISTORIC DOCUMENTATION SPRINGFIELD RAILROAD UNDERPASS BRIDGE Location: West Virginia State Route 28 and Abernathy Run Springfield Hampshire County West Virginia USGS Springfield Quadrangle Date of Construction: circa 1880 Builder: South Branch Railroad Company Present Owner: West Virginia State Rail Authority 120 Water Plant Drive Moorefield, WV 26836 Present Use: Railroad Bridge Significance: The Springfield Railroad Underpass is significant on the local level with a period of significance 1890 to 1952. Project Information: The project has been undertaken due to the poor condition of the Underpass bridge. Any future deterioration of the underpass bridge will result in its closure, the existing underpass warrants replacement. The documentation was undertaken in July 2015 in accordance with a Memorandum of Agreement among the West Virginia Department of Transportation and West Virginia State Historic Preservation Office. These measures are required prior to replacement of this National Register eligible structure. Sondra L. Mullins, Structural Historian West Virginia Division of Highways Charleston, WV 25301 July 10, 2015 Springfield Railroad Underpass Page 2 BALTIMORE & OHIO RAILROAD HISTORY The Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Company (B & O) was chartered on February 28, 1827 by businessmen from Baltimore, Maryland. The goal of the businessmen was to ensure that traffic was not lost to the proposed Chesapeake & Ohio Canal. By the end of the 19th century the B & O had almost 5,800 miles of track connecting Chicago and St.
    [Show full text]
  • The Western North Carolina Railroad, 1855-1894
    THE WESTERN NORTH CAROLINA RAILROAD, 1855-1894 A thesis Presented to The Faculty of the Graduate School Western Carolina University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts by William Hutson Abrams, Jr. August 6, 1976 PREFACE The Western North Carolina Railroad was the instrumental force in opening up the isolated communities of Western North Carolina. This paper will deal primarily with the construction of this railroad which left Salisbury, climbed the mountains to Asheville, and continued to ter.ninal points of Paint Rock and Ducktown, on the Tennessee Line. The difficulties encountered during construction will be emphasized along with the political aspects that went along with construction. Emphasis will be placed on the time between the State's acquisition of the Railroad in 1875 and the completion to Murphy in 1891. An introductory chapter will briefly cover the start of the railroad in 1855, its role in the Civil War, and the delays in construction caused by the scandals of the Reconstruction Period. Starting with 1875, a vital element in the construction, convict labor, will be dealt with. The management of the railroad varied between state and private ownership. It suffered the financial pains that many early lines endured. Most of all, it was hindered by the ever present problem presented by nature as the track was built through so~e of the roughest terrain east of the Rocky Mountains. This was really the significant feature of the railroad because at many times its further construction seemed to be impossible. Political, financial, managerial, and labor problems testify to the trying task that was accomplished and to the desire of the people of the western part of the state to have their railroad.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2014 Network for Economic Expansion Table of Contents
    ANNUAL REPORT 2014 NETWORK FOR ECONOMIC EXPANSION TABLE OF CONTENTS LETTER FROM THE CHAIRMAN .........................................................................................4 JOB CREATION FOR THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE..........................................................5 PURSUIT OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT .......................................................................6 ONGOING CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM IN PLACE .....................................7 STRATEGIC PLANNING: THE BLUEPRINT ......................................................................9 A MORE POWERFUL DRIVER OF PROSPERITY ...........................................................10 MEASURING ECONOMIC IMPACT .................................................................................... 11 BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND MANAGEMENT TEAM ................................................12 FINANCIAL REPORT...............................................................................................................13 NORTH CAROLINA RAILROAD COMPANY CORRIDOR MAP ..................................31 OUR MISSION: To develop the unique North Carolina Railroad assets for the good of the people of North Carolina. OUR VISION: To improve our state by: Enabling freight to grow business; Expanding rail to move people; Investing in North Carolina. HISTORY TELLS US THAT THE PURPOSE OF THE NORTH CAROLINA RAILROAD COMPANY’S CREATION 166 YEARS AGO WAS TO ENHANCE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT. IN 2014, THE COMPANY’S COMMITMENT TO SERVE THE PEOPLE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE SAME WAY
    [Show full text]
  • At Pocahontas Island City of Petersburg, Virginia
    ARCHAEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATION OF SIX SITES (44PG5, 44PG470, 44PG471, 44PG472, 44PG473, and 44PG474) AT POCAHONTAS ISLAND CITY OF PETERSBURG, VIRGINIA VOLUME I: RESULTS OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL TESTING Prepared For: Department of Planning and Community Development City of Petersburg 135 N. Union Street Petersburg, Virginia 23803 Prepared By: Matthew Laird (Ph.D.) James River Institute for Archaeology, Inc. 223 McLaws Circle, Suite 1 Williamsburg, Virginia 23185 (757) 229-9485 September 2006 ABSTRACT Between December 2005 and April 2006, the James River Institute for Archaeology, Inc. (JRIA), conducted intensive archaeological testing of six sites within the Pocahontas Island Historic District. The objective of the testing, which focused primarily on properties owned by the City of Petersburg, was to evaluate the integrity and research potential of a representative sample of site types encompassing both the prehistoric- and historic-period occupations of Pocahontas Island. The resources examined included the archaeological components of the extant Jarratt House (44PG470) and “Underground Railroad House” (44PG471); the site of the former Richmond & Petersburg Railroad depot (44PG472); a domestic site spanning the eighteenth- through twentieth centuries in the vacant lot at 301 Rolfe Street (44PG473); the former site of the early twentieth- century Pocahontas Distilling Co. whiskey distillery at 343 Rolfe Street, which also included a nineteenth-/twentieth-century domestic component (44PG474); and one previously inventoried site (44PG5) with prehistoric Native-American and historic domestic components. In general, the investigated sites retained a high degree of physical integrity, and yielded significant concentrations of artifacts and evidence of intact cultural layers and features. Individually, the six sites retained sufficient integrity and research potential to be considered eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places under Criterion D.
    [Show full text]