Wind River Canopy Crane Research Facility and Wind River Experimental Forest

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Wind River Canopy Crane Research Facility and Wind River Experimental Forest Focus on Field Stations WIND RIVER CANOPY CRANE RESEARCH FACILITY AND WIND RIVER EXPERIMENTAL FOREST Introduction Rising over 75 m into the air, the Wind River Canopy Crane circles slowly above 500-year-old Douglas-fir–west- ern hemlock forest in the Thornton T. Munger Research Natural Area (RNA). The crane swings around an area of 2.3 ha, carrying a 4- or 8-person gondola along its 85 m long jib (see cover, this Fig. 2. Map of the Wind River Experimental Forest, including the T. T. Munger issue of the ESA Bulletin). From the RNA and WRCCRF, located in southwestern Washington State. gondola one can gaze over the entire old-growth canopy of the RNA, beyond to the surrounding Wind River Experi- The Wind River Canopy Crane Re- The WREF includes a mosaic of mental Forest, east and west to the search Facility (WRCCRF) and Wind age classes resulting from a major fire Western Cascades of Washington State, River Experimental Forest (WREF; in the late 1840s, the extensive 1902 south across the Wind River Valley to Fig. 2) have a close and exciting sym- Yacolt Burn (Fig. 3) and subsequent re- the Columbia Gorge, or down into the biosis. The crane lies within an RNA burns, and a variety of stands that have lacy, undulating canopy of lichen- and that has remained in more or less natu- been managed since the early 1900s. bryophyte-laden conifers. The operator ral condition since the last major forest The Yacolt fire burned over 200,000 slowly glides the gondola over the tree- fire about 500 years ago (Franklin acres (81,000 ha) and 38 people died. It tops before descending next to a tree 1972). The 478-ha (1,180-acre) RNA is burned more than 36 hours, at speeds or snag of interest to the researcher. surrounded by the Wind River Experi- up to 87 mph, with flame lengths of 30 Whether studying atmospheric carbon mental Forest. Near the RNA is a large feet and a heat intensity of 1,000˚F. fixation or sampling foliose lichens on (39-ha), newly abandoned nursery field There were at least five re-burns. The branches of 60-m trees, the opportunity that has been plowed and irrigated original fire was started by slash and to study within the canopy, face to face since the early 1980s. settler fires fanned by east winds. with the trees, is exciting (Fig. 1). Fig. 1. Examining needles for herbivory at the top of a 60-m Douglas-fir. Fig. 3. J. V. Hofman, early Wind River scientist, standing amidst the Yacolt burn. July 2003 115 ics, reproductive strategies, adapt- cates with the crane operator to posi- ability, and growth potential of Dou- tion the gondola in suitable locations glas-fir forests (Isaac 1943). It is also for research purposes. In addition, the here in 1977 that the first efforts at arbornaut is trained in vertical rope res- actually describing old-growth forests cue and, in case of emergency, can took place (Franklin et al. 1981). evacuate personnel from the gondola. The WRCCRF is a University of One exceptional aspect of work- Washington College of Forest Resources ing at the WREF and WRCCRF is the facility, managed in cooperation with scientific foundation built by past re- the USDA Forest Service Pacific North- search and monitoring. Forestry re- west Research Station, the Gifford search has been ongoing at Wind Pinchot National Forest, and the West- River since the early 1900s. Many ern Regional Center of the National permanent plots have been estab- Institute for Global Environmental lished in the experimental forest and Change (Department of Energy). The its environs, providing opportunities Pacific Northwest Research Station, in for a wide variety of both silvicultural cooperation with the Gifford Pinchot and ecosystem studies (Fig. 5). The Fig. 4. T. T. Munger measuring trees in National Forest, manages the WREF, array of age classes lends itself to one of the earliest permanent study plots. which is 4,208 ha in size and divided ecosystem process studies across into two blocks, the Trout Creek and chronosequences. The experimental The WREF/WRCCRF complex is Panther Creek divisions (Fig. 2). forest and the RNA designations pro- within the Mt. Adams Ranger District The canopy crane, with its forest vide good administrative protection of the Gifford Pinchot National For- canopy access capabilities, is a central for research studies and plots. est. The well-known Pacific Crest feature of the WRCCRF and WREF The canopy crane has been used for Trail that travels along the Cascade (Shaw et al., in press). The old-growth a broad range of research, including crest from Canada to Mexico passes forest (~ 500 years old) under the crane organismal biology and ecology, pro- through the experimental forest, less is a mix of Douglas-fir, western hem- cess ecology, tree ecophysiology, and than a mile from the RNA. Numerous lock, western redcedar, Pacific silver global climate change/carbon dynam- other Research Natural Areas are in fir, and Pacific yew. Researchers step ics. The Annual Wind River Canopy the immediate vicinity, as are several into a gondola at the forest floor and are Crane Research Facility Scientific Con- Wilderness Areas, Mt. St. Helens Na- lifted up to their desired locations. The ference (The ninth was held in 2003) tional Volcanic Monument, and Mt. crane is operated by a Research Tower highlights current research at the site Rainier National Park. Portland, Or- Crane Operator who sits 74 m above the and provides an opportunity for a di- egon, a major Northwest metropoli- forest floor in an operator’s cab. An verse group of scientists to communi- tan center, is an hour away, and is arbornaut accompanies researchers in cate and collaborate. Recent programs accessed by driving through the spec- the gondola. The arbornaut communi- have included 35 papers, with about 70 tacular Columbia River Gorge Na- people attending. The conference oc- tional Scenic Area. curs in the historic Hodgson-Lindberg The WRCCRF was established in Training Center (Fig. 6). 1995, but the surrounding experimen- tal forest provides an historical context that goes back as far as 1909 when Environment Thornton T. Munger began a long-term study on the growth of Douglas-fir Located in the central Cascade (Fig. 4) in what was to become the mountain range of southern Washing- Wind River Experimental Forest some ton State, the Wind River Valley is a 25 years later. Munger also had the north–south oriented valley that prescience to establish one of the first merges into the Columbia River RNAs in the region, later named after Gorge, a major geographical feature him, and now the site of the canopy that cuts through the Cascade moun- crane. This experimental forest is where tain range at the border of Oregon the earliest research on Douglas-fir and Washington State (Fig. 7). The was done, results that established the gorge connects the maritime-influ- most basic tenets for silviculture and enced regions of western Oregon and management of the great Douglas-fir Washington to the continental influ- forests in western Washington and Fig. 5. Installing soil moisture probes ences of eastern Washington and Or- Oregon. Long-term research in the WREF in an old-growth forest adjacent to per- egon. This sea-level environmental has provided insights into tree genet- manent sample plots. and ecological gradient from the 116 Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America The climate is characterized by high rainfall (2223 mm/yr), moderate temperatures (mean annual tempera- ture 8.7˚C), winter snowpack, and summer drought (June, July, and Au- gust receive < 5% of annual precipi- tation) (Fig. 8). The forests are tem- perate coniferous seasonal rain for- ests due to the contrast in seasonal rainfall. Rain-on-snow, freezing rain, graupel events, and cold east winds are common in winter. The Wind River Experimental Forest is blanketed with young, ma- ture, and old forests of Douglas-fir, western hemlock, western redcedar, grand fir, Pacific silver fir, noble fir, Pacific yew, western white pine, bigleaf maple, and Pacific dogwood. The diversity of forests is also ex- Fig. 6. The Hodgson-Lindberg Training Center at the Wind River Work Center, pressed at the head of the valley Gifford Pinchot National Forest, site of the WRCCRF Annual Scientific Confer- where lodgepole pine, Engelmann ence, various workshops, and meetings. spruce, and western larch occur. A small cedar swamp, beaver ponds, western hemlock/Douglas-fir forests of the experimental forest; Mt. Hood and marshes provide areas of aquatic, of the west to the shrubsteppe com- is about 50 km to the south. Within semiaquatic, and moist habitat. munities to the east occurs in less the valley and a central feature of the than 100 km. experimental forest is Trout Creek Research Volcanism characterizes the Cas- Hill, a Quaternary volcano, which re- cade Mountains and the Wind River leased lava flows that filled the valley Biodiversity Valley. Bedrock in the valley is com- floor about 340,000 years ago. Soils posed of Miocene/Oligocene and within the valley, mostly derived The spatial and temporal organi- Quaternary volcanic flows, as well as from volcanic ash, are generally stone zation of biodiversity, as well as the intrusive Miocene basalts. Mt. St. free and may be from eruptions of maintenance of habitat to protect rare Helens is approximately 30 km north Mt. St. Helens. and endangered organisms, has been an ongoing research and monitoring topic in the Wind River Valley for some time. The T. T. Munger RNA was established in 1926 to protect a large tract of low-elevation old- growth forest, and includes wetlands.
Recommended publications
  • Carson - Wind River Valley Water Supply by Ivan Donaldson Skamania County Historical Society Carson - Wind River Valley Water Supply
    Irrigation flume wends way from Panther Creek toward yet-to-be-built High Bridge over Wind River. Carson - Wind River Valley Water Supply By Ivan Donaldson Skamania County Historical Society Carson - Wind River Valley Water Supply By Ivan Donaldson Skamania County Historical Society E. J. Weigle home north of Carson. (This and other photos presented to Skamania County Historical Museum by Paul Boyd.) Much of the soil of the Carson Valley is a shallow sandy layer deposited on top of the geologically recent Trout Creek Olivine basalt lava flow. This is the lava flow which filled the Wind River canyon to a considerable depth, dammed the Columbia River, and created the Panther Creek reef or lava dike which is described later in this article. The soil, while fertile and productive, dries out quickly and crops grown in this valley require frequent watering in the summertime. Contra to this statement is the knowledge that the early strawberry fields produced well with no irrigation water. During the first decade of the 1900s, entrepreneur and promoter, B. M. Hawley of Home Valley, Washington, and his associates began action upon their dream to convert the heavily timbered Carson Valley into an agricultural paradise. These gentlemen indulged their expensive fantasy to inititate construction of an irrigation flume which to exrend from Panther Creek six to eight miles to the semi-level Carson Valley plain as we know it now in 1984. Carson Water Supply — Page 2 Skamania County records show that on 1 April 1907 B. M. Hawley filed for a water right on Panther Creek, tributary to Wind River, for 60 cubic feet per second of water, giving the point of diversion and stating it was for irrigation, power, and domestic use.
    [Show full text]
  • ªª47 ªª47 ªª63 ªª85 ªª85 ªª84 ªª84 ªª48 ªª45 ªª26 ªª56 ªª21 ªª22 ªª22 ªª55 ªª55
    Gifford Pinchot National Forest Special Forest Products Map: North Half R. 2 E. R. 3 E. R. 4 E. R. 5 E. R. 6 E. R. 7 E. R. 8 E. R. 9 E. R. 10 E. R. 11 E. Puyallup Point Lower C edar Lake N Aurora Peak Ceda r Lake 6 1 . Swa mp Lake 8 1 6 3 2 Bald Hill Glacier V8 iew 2 . 6 2 1 Alder T Shriner Peak Cou gar Lake Green Hill &M Alder Reservoir 2 6 7 2 Gla4cier View Wilderness 5 8 G 9 obblers Knob 7 2 . 0 4 Reliance H 9 ill 0 Mount Beljica 0 N Mount Wow 0 .1 9 4 0 2 5 Elbe Crag Mountain 1 7409017 &M Ashford . &M 706 5900037 T 0 0 5 Stahl Mountain Tumtum Peak 0 2 0 0 Bald Mountain 0 0 28 4 8 BIG CRE E K 2 2 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 7400000 0 52 0 6 0 7 Ladd Mou ª 42 4 ntain 5 Mineral Lake Fry "2 ingpan Moun 0 tain 0 9 9 0 Butter 3 0 4 85 Creek RNA 4 0 0 7 5 ª 2 Huckle ª berry Mountain 2 5 7 Roundtop Mo 2 4 untain 2 0 5 2 0 4 Cougar Mo 5 5 2 7 untain 0 .1 &M 5 8 1 2 4 8 50 0 O 0 L 1B 5 sborne Mountain 4 ookout Mountain 16 4 00 7 Jug Lake 41 0 Mineral 0 ª52 0 0 1 1 6 44 9 2 1 5 0 0 84 0 4 4 0 0 A .
    [Show full text]
  • Columbia River Basin, Columbia Gorge Province Carson, Spring Creek, Little White Salmon, and Willard National Fish Hatcheries As
    U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service - Pacific Region Columbia River Basin Hatchery Review Team Columbia River Basin, Columbia Gorge Province Little White Salmon, Big White Salmon, and Wind River Watersheds Carson, Spring Creek, Little White Salmon, and Willard National Fish Hatcheries Assessments and Recommendations Final Report, Appendix B: Briefing Document; Summary of Background Information December 2007 USFWS Columbia Basin Hatchery Review Team Columbia Gorge NFHs Assessments and Recommendations Report – December 2007 Carson NFH Willard NFH Spring Creek NFH Little White Salmon NFH Figure 1. National Fish Hatcheries in the Columbia River Gorge1 1 Modified figure from Rawding 2000b. USFWS Columbia Basin Hatchery Review Team Columbia Gorge NFHs Assessments and Recommendations Report – December 2007 Table of Contents I. COLUMBIA GORGE REGION ............................................................................................. 1 II. CARSON NATIONAL FISH HATCHERY .......................................................................... 51 IIA. CARSON NFH SPRING CHINOOK ....................................................................... 59 III. SPRING CREEK NATIONAL FISH HATCHERY .............................................................. 95 IIIA. SPRING CREEK NFH TULE FALL CHINOOK ..................................................... 104 IV. LITTLE WHITE SALMON NATIONAL FISH HATCHERY ............................................. 137 IVA. LITTLE WHITE SALMON NFH UPRIVER BRIGHT FALL CHINOOK .................... 147 IVB. LITTLE
    [Show full text]
  • Speaker Bios
    Columbia Gorge 2017 Economic Symposium Speaker Information Welcome from Ken Bailey Ken is Chair of the Board of Directors for Mid-Columbia Economic Development District and Vice President and Shareholder in Orchard View Farms, Inc. Orchard View grows, packs and ships premium fresh cherries for domestic and international sales and grows some pears and wine grapes. It is a 4th generation family business founded in 1923. Ken returned to the farm after his graduation from Oregon State University with a BS in horticulture. Ken and his wife Shirley have three grown children and six grandchildren. Keynote from Jason Spadaro Jason Spadaro is President of SDS Lumber. Wally Stevenson, Frank Daubenspeck, and Bruce Stevenson founded SDS Lumber Company in 1946, and Stevenson Land Company in 1990. SDS Lumber Company Manufactures Lumber, Plywood, Power and Pulp in Bingen for a variety of markets. Stevenson Land Company is focused on managing approximately 70,000 acres of timberland in the mid-Columbia gorge. These two companies work in partnership to grow high-quality timber and manufacture high-quality lumber products. SDS Lumber Company’s mill site is fully integrated including full maintenance, engineering and construction capability. This structure provides constant innovation and improvement to our manufacturing processes keeping them efficient and productive in increasingly challenging markets. Economic Data Presentations Scott Bailey For the past 25 years, Scott Bailey has served as the Regional Economist for the Employment Security Department’s Labor Market & Economic Analysis Branch covering Southwest Washington. Scott is the local source of labor market information for the region, tracking unemployment, industry trends, the occupational outlook, and wages and income.
    [Show full text]
  • Gifford Pinchot
    THE FORGOTTEN FOREST: EXPLORING THE GIFFORD PINCHOT A Publication of the Washington Trails Association1 7A 9 4 8 3 1 10 7C 2 6 5 7B Cover Photo by Ira Spring 2 Table of Contents About Washington Trails Association Page 4 A Million Acres of outdoor Recreation Page 5 Before You Hit the Trail Page 6 Leave No Trace 101 Page 7 The Outings (see map on facing page) 1. Climbing Mount Adams Pages 8-9 2. Cross Country Skiing: Oldman Pass Pages 10-11 3. Horseback Riding: Quartz Creek Pages 12-13 4. Hiking: Juniper Ridge Pages 14-15 5. Backpacking the Pacific Crest Trail: Indian Heaven Wilderness Pages 16-17 6. Mountain Biking: Siouxon Trail Pages 18-19 7. Wildlife Observation: Pages 20-21 A. Goat Rocks Wilderness B. Trapper Creek Wilderness C. Lone Butte Wildlife Emphasis Area 8. Camping at Takhlakh Lake Pages 22-23 9. Fly Fishing the Cowlitz River Pages 24-25 10. Berry Picking in the Sawtooth Berry Fields Pages 26-27 Acknowledgements Page 28 How to Join WTA Page 29-30 Volunteer Trail Maintenance Page 31 Important Contacts Page 32 3 About Washington Trails Association Washington Trails Association (WTA) is the voice for hikers in Washington state. We advocate protection of hiking trails, take volunteers out to maintain them, and promote hiking as a healthy, fun way to explore Washington. Ira Spring and Louise Marshall co-founded WTA in 1966 as a response to the lack of a political voice for Washington’s hiking community. WTA is now the largest state-based hiker advocacy organization in the country, with over 5,500 members and more than 1,800 volunteers.
    [Show full text]
  • Trapper Creek Loop, WA
    Trapper Creek Loop, WA Vicinity Location: The trailhead is about 42 miles northeast of Portland, Oregon in the Gifford Pinchot National Forest. Directions: From Portland, Oregon, there are two ways to drive to the trailhead. If you have an extra 30 minutes then make your trip a loop drive. For the loop drive, take I-205 north across the Columbia River. Exit I-205 on Highway 14 east for about 28 miles through the town of Stevenson. For the non-loop option, take I-84 east from Portland and take exit #44 for Cascade Locks. Take the first right turn, just after you go under the Bridge of the Gods. Pay the $2.00 toll, cross the bridge, and turn right onto Highway 14 and drive 2.5 miles to Stevenson. Once you get to Stevenson, drive about 2 more miles east to Wind River Road. Wind River Road is 5.9 miles east of the Bridge of the Gods. Drive on the Wind River Road north for about 13.4 miles until about 0.25 mile past the Carson National Fish Hatchery. Take a left on Mineral Springs Road (Forest Road 3065) and drive for 0.5 mile. Take the first right on Forest Road 5401 and drive about 0.3 mile to the parking area and trailhead. There is an outhouse at the trailhead. A Northwest Forest Park permit is required at the trailhead. Length and Elevation: To Observation Peak: Length 8.6 miles, total ascent 3,446 feet, descent 432 feet. Total: Length 15.1 miles, total ascent 5,362 feet, total descent 5,362 feet.
    [Show full text]
  • IC-62, Heat Flow Studies in the Steamboat Mountain-Lemei Rock
    ,. \\ :\ .J ~\ .... 7 \; t,6 i u2 W~~fnffl:RY u.no C ';I, .... DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES i n BERT L. COLE, Commissioner of Public Lands ; RALPH A. BESWICK Supervisor I: s DIVISION OF GEOLOGY AND EARTH RESOURCES VAUGHN E. LIVINGSTON, JR., State Geologist INFORMATION CIRCULAR 62 HEAT FLOW STUDIES IN THE STEAMBOAT MOUNTAIN-LEMEI ROCK AREA, SKAMANIA COUNTY, WASHINGTON BY J. ERIC SCHUSTER, DAVID D. BLACKWELL, PAUL E. HAMMOND, and MARSHALL T. HUNTTING Final report to the NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION on sponsored proiect AER75 ... 02747 1978 STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES BERT L COLE, Commissioner of Public Lands RALPH A. BESWICK Supervisor DIVISION OF GEOLOGY AND EARTH RESOURCES VAUGHN E. LIVINGSTON, JR., State Geologist INFORMATION CIRCULAR WA He<1.t iluw 33.J. -7 stu.diei::,; ln the .M6 t> i Stean, l:on. t --- bJ. ~uu,i ta i u-.Lem~ i 1970 Jiuck d.rea, Skaina11ia Cuunt),, W a i'ii1 i u ~ton HEAT FLOW STUDIES IN THE STEAMBOAT MOUNTAIN-LEMEI ROCK AREA, SKAMANIA COUNTY, WASHINGTON BY J. ERIC SCHUSTER, DAVID D. BLACKWELL, PAUL E. HAMMOND, and MARSHALL T. HUNTTING Final report to the NATIONAL SC !ENCE FOUNDATION on sponsored project AER75-02747 1978 CONTENTS Abstract ................. , . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 1 Introduction ..................................................................... , • . 2 Acknowledgments • • • • • • . • • . • . • • . • . • . • . • . • . • • • • • • . • • • • . • . 3 Geo logy • . • • • • • • . • • • • • • . • • . • • . • . • . • • . • . 4 Genera I features ............................
    [Show full text]
  • The Columbia River Gorge: Its Geologic History Interpreted from the Columbia River Highway by IRA A
    VOLUMB 2 NUMBBI3 NOVBMBBR, 1916 . THE .MINERAL · RESOURCES OF OREGON ' PuLhaLed Monthly By The Oregon Bureau of Mines and Geology Mitchell Point tunnel and viaduct, Columbia River Hi~hway The .. Asenstrasse'' of America The Columbia River Gorge: its Geologic History Interpreted from the Columbia River Highway By IRA A. WILLIAMS 130 Pages 77 Illustrations Entered aa oeoond cl,... matter at Corvallis, Ore., on Feb. 10, l9lt, accordintt to tbe Act or Auc. :U, 1912. .,.,._ ;t ' OREGON BUREAU OF MINES AND GEOLOGY COMMISSION On1cm or THm Co><M188ION AND ExmBIT OREGON BUILDING, PORTLAND, OREGON Orncm or TBm DtBIICTOR CORVALLIS, OREGON .,~ 1 AMDJ WITHY COMBE, Governor HENDY M. PABKB, Director C OMMISSION ABTBUB M. SWARTLEY, Mining Engineer H. N. LAWRill:, Port.land IRA A. WILLIAMS, Geologist W. C. FELLOWS, Sumpter 1. F . REDDY, Grants Pass 1. L. WooD. Albany R. M. BIITT8, Cornucopia P. L. CAI<PBELL, Eugene W 1. KEBR. Corvallis ........ Volume 2 Number 3 ~f. November Issue {...j .· -~ of the MINERAL RESOURCES OF OREGON Published by The Oregon Bureau of Mines and Geology ~•, ;: · CONTAINING The Columbia River Gorge: its Geologic History l Interpreted from the Columbia River Highway t. By IRA A. WILLIAMS 130 Pages 77 Illustrations 1916 ILLUSTRATIONS Mitchell Point t unnel and v iaduct Beacon Rock from Columbia River (photo by Gifford & Prentiss) front cover Highway .. 72 Geologic map of Columbia river gorge. 3 Beacon Rock, near view . ....... 73 East P ortland and Mt. Hood . 1 3 Mt. Hamilton and Table mountain .. 75 Inclined volcanic ejecta, Mt. Tabor. 19 Eagle creek tuff-conglomerate west of Lava cliff along Sandy river.
    [Show full text]
  • NEON Site-Level Plot Summary Wind River Experimental Forest (WREF)
    NEON Site-Level Plot Summary Wind River Experimental Forest (WREF) Document Information Date March 14, 2019 Author Erik Dahlke, Senior Regional Soil Scientist Soil Survey Region 1, Portland, OR Site Background The Wind River Experimental Forest NEON site (WREF) site is approximately 60 kilometers northeast of Vancouver in Skamania County, Washington. The WREF site is at the United States Forest Service (USFS) Pacific Northwest Research Station – Wind River Experimental Station in the Gifford Pinchot National Forest (GPNF). WREF covers roughly 10,360 acres within Major Land Resource Area 3 (MLRA 3) – Olympic and Cascade Mountains. Most of the area lacks a Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) Soil Survey; a small portion occurs within the 1990 Soil Survey of Skamania County, Area, Washington (WA659). A USFS Soil Resource Inventory (SRI) is available for GPNF. This product, produced at a smaller scale than NRCS soil maps, provides inventory information for geology, landform, and slope, as well as general soil groupings. Site Information The WREF site has varied relief. Elevation and slope ranges were derived from a digital elevation model (DEM), and range from slightly less than 300 meters to over 1275 meters; slope gradients range from 0 to more than 90 percent. Mean annual precipitation is between 2200 millimeters to about 3000 millimeters based on data from the PRISM (Parameter-elevation Regression on Independent Slopes Model) Climate Group at Oregon State University. The WREF site consists of two distinct land areas referred to here as the ‘East Unit’ and ‘West Unit’. The West Unit contains the NEON instrument tower and all but six of the NEON distributed plots.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecological Setting of the Wind River Old-Growth Forest
    Ecosystems (2004) 7: 427439 DOI: 10.1007/~10021-004-0135-6 0 2004 Springer-Verlag - Ecological Setting of the Wind River Old-growth Forest David C. shaw,ly2* Jerry F. ~ranklin,'~'Ken ~ible,'.' Jeffrey ~lo~atek,~ Elizabeth Freeman, Sarah ~reene,~and Geoffrey G. parker5 wind River Canopy Crane Research Facility, University of Washington, Carson, Washington 98610, USA; 'college of Forest Resources, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195-2100, USA; '~epartmentof Plant Biology, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona 85287-1601, USA; 4PacificNorthwest Research Station, Forestry Sciences Laboratory, US Forest Service, Corvallis, Oregon 97331, USA; 5~mithsonianEnvironmental Research Center, Edgewater, Maryland 21037-0028, USA The Wind River old-growth forest, in the southern cific yew (86 trees ha-'), western red cedar (30 trees Cascade Range of Washington State, is a cool (av- ha-'), and Pacific silver fir (47 trees ha-'). The av- erage annual temperature, 8.7"C), moist (average erage height of Douglas-fir is 52.0 m (tallest tree, annual precipitation, 2223 mm), 500-year-old 64.6 m), whereas western hemlock averages 19.0 m Douglas-fir-westem hemlock forest of moderate to (tallest tree, 55.7 m). The regional disturbance re- low productivity at 37 1-rn elevation on a less than gime is dominated by high-severity to moderate- 10% slope. There is a seasonal snowpack (Novem- severity fire, from which this forest is thought to ber-March), and rain-on-snow and freezing-rain have originated. There is no evidence that fire has events are common in winter. Local geology is occurred in the forest after establishment.
    [Show full text]
  • Experimental Forests and Ranges of the USDA Forest Service
    United States Department of Experimental Forests and Ranges Agriculture Forest Service of the USDA Forest Service Northeastern Research Station General Technical Report NE-321 Revised Abstract The USDA Forest Service has an outstanding scientific resource in the 79 Experimental Forests and Ranges that exist across the United States and its territories. These valuable scientific resources incorporate a broad range of climates, forest types, research emphases, and history. This publication describes each of the research sites within the Experimental Forests and Ranges network, providing information about history, climate, vegetation, soils, long-term data bases, research history and research products, as well as identifying collaborative opportunities, and providing contact information. The Compilers MARY BETH ADAMS, soil scientist, LINDA H. LOUGHRY, secretary, LINDA L. PLAUGHER, support services supervisor, USDA Forest Service, Northeastern Research Station, Timber and Watershed Laboratory, Parsons, West Virginia. Manuscript received for publication 17 November 2003 Published by: For additional copies: USDA FOREST SERVICE USDA Forest Service 11 CAMPUS BLVD SUITE 200 Publications Distribution NEWTOWN SQUARE PA 19073-3294 359 Main Road September 2004 Delaware, OH 43015-8640 Revised March 2008 Fax: (740)368-0152 Revised publication available in CD-ROM only Visit our homepage at: http://www.nrs.fs.fed.us Experimental Forests and Ranges of the USDA Forest Service Compiled by: Mary Beth Adams Linda Loughry Linda Plaugher Contents Introduction
    [Show full text]
  • Wind River Watershed Restoration Project
    Wind River Watershed Restoration Project US Forest Service Annual Reports 2000 - 2002 DOE/BP-00000407-1 June 2002 Field37: This Document should be cited as follows: Bair, Brian, Anthony Olegario, Paul Powers, David Doede, Eric Plimmer, Jennifer Deshong, ''Wind River Watershed Restoration Project, Segment II'', Project No. 1998- 01900, 66 electronic pages, (BPA Report DOE/BP-00000407-1) Bonneville Power Administration P.O. Box 3621 Portland, Oregon 97208 This report was funded by the Bonneville Power Administration (BPA), U.S. Department of Energy, as part of BPA's program to protect, mitigate, and enhance fish and wildlife affected by the development and operation of hydroelectric facilities on the Columbia River and its tributaries. The views in this report are the author's and do not necessarily represent the views of BPA. Wind River Watershed Restoration 2000-2002 Annual Reports In Four Segments June 2002 Prepared by: Wind River Restoration Team Prepared for: Bonneville Power Administration Environment, Fish and Wildlife P.O. Box 3621 Portland, OR 97208-3621 Project Number: 199801901 1 Contents Segment II: <USFS Contribution> ................................................................. II-1 Report A: Restoration ...............………………............................................. II-A-1 by Brian Bair Executive Summary...............………………..........................................……... 6 Wind River Discharge Gage...............………………............................................. 8 by Brian Bair, Anthony Olegario & Paul Powers Methods,
    [Show full text]