Biography Gregor Mcgregor

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Biography Gregor Mcgregor James Macfarlane (1844-1914) Gregor McGregor (1848-1914) Senator for Tasmania 1901-1910 Senator for South Australia 1901-1914 ames Macfarlane was born in Glasgow, regor McGregor was born in Kilmun, McGregor was universally respected and was JScotland and arrived in Tasmania around GArgyllshire, Scotland and worked his renowned for being a practical rather than a 1870. With his brother he formed Macfarlane passage to South Australia in 1877. A theoretical politician. Ill health forced him to Brothers which became one of the colony’s labourer, McGregor was an active unionist retire from the Senate in July 1914 and he leading shipping businesses. He was who was instrumental in the formation of died soon after retiring. Chairman of the Hobart Chamber of the South Australian Labor Party. McGregor Commerce. was a member of the South Australian Legislative Council 1894-1901. At the first federal election in 1901 Macfarlane was elected to represent Tasmania as a In 1901 McGregor was elected to represent Freetrader in the Senate. He was active in the South Australia in the Senate at the first first Senate on matters relating to shipping federal election. A fervent supporter of and navigation, including the Select protectionist policies, McGregor was the Committee appointed to inquire into first South Australian Labor representative in steamship communication between the the Senate. He led the Federal Parliamentary Australian mainland and Tasmania in 1901, Labor Party in the Senate in 1901 and was and was a member of the Royal Commission Leader of the Opposition 1913-14. In three on the Navigation Bill 1904-06. Macfarlane pre-war Labor ministries he was Vice- was defeated in the election of 1910. President of the Executive Council. Although virtually blind, McGregor was assisted in his work in the Senate by a remarkable memory. The state of Tasmania was also represented in the first Senate by: The state of South Australia was also represented in the first Senate by: John Henry Keating John Singleton Clemons David John O’Keefe Sir Josiah Henry Symon Thomas Playford Sir Richard Chaffey Baker Henry Dobson Cyril St.Clair Cameron Sir John William Downer David Morley Charleston.
Recommended publications
  • Inside the Canberra Press Gallery: Life in the Wedding Cake of Old
    INSIDE the CANBERRA PRESS GALLERY Life in the Wedding Cake of Old Parliament House INSIDE the CANBERRA PRESS GALLERY Life in the Wedding Cake of Old Parliament House Rob Chalmers Edited by Sam Vincent and John Wanna THE AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY E PRESS E PRESS Published by ANU E Press The Australian National University Canberra ACT 0200, Australia Email: [email protected] This title is also available online at: http://epress.anu.edu.au National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry Author: Chalmers, Rob, 1929-2011 Title: Inside the Canberra press gallery : life in the wedding cake of Old Parliament House / Rob Chalmers ; edited by Sam Vincent and John Wanna. ISBN: 9781921862366 (pbk.) 9781921862373 (ebook) Notes: Includes bibliographical references and index. Subjects: Australia. Parliament--Reporters and Government and the press--Australia. Journalism--Political aspects-- Press and politics--Australia. Other Authors/Contributors: Vincent, Sam. Wanna, John. Dewey Number: 070.4493240994 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publisher. Cover design and layout by ANU E Press Back cover image courtesy of Heide Smith Printed by Griffin Press This edition © 2011 ANU E Press Contents Acknowledgments . vii Foreword . ix Preface . xi 1 . Youth . 1 2 . A Journo in Sydney . 9 3 . Inside the Canberra Press Gallery . 17 4 . Menzies: The giant of Australian politics . 35 5 . Ming’s Men . 53 6 . Parliament Disgraced by its Members . 71 7 . Booze, Sex and God .
    [Show full text]
  • Australia's Awakening Thirty Years in the Life of an Australian Agitator
    Australia's Awakening Thirty Years in the Life of an Australian Agitator Spence, W G William Guthrie (1846-1926) A digital text sponsored by New South Wales Centenary of Federation Committee University of Sydney Library Sydney 2000 http://setis.library.usyd.edu.au/fed/ © University of Sydney Library. The texts and Images are not to be used for commercial purposes without permission Source Text: Prepared from the print edition published by Australia: The Worker Trustees, Sydney and Melbourne 1909 First Published: 1909 Languages: French Latin 329.994/13 Australian Etexts 1890-1909 labour history prose nonfiction federation 2001 Creagh Cole Coordinator Final Checking and Parsing Australia's Awakening Thirty Years in the Life of an Australian Agitator Sydney and Melbourne The Worker Trustees 1909 To The Tyrranical Employer and the Aggressive Fighting Trade Unionist The Author [William Guthrie Spence, M.H.R., President Australian Workers' Union] .. .. .. .. .. .. Following Page 40 Contents. Chapter. Page. I. Bedrock .. .. .. .. .. .. 11 II. Gold Digging Days .. .. .. .. 18 III. The A.M.A. .. .. .. .. .. .. 24 IV. “He vos Come Back no More” .. 37 V. The King of the North-East .. .. 45 VI. Capitalistic Intrigue .. .. .. .. 51 VII. The Wool Kings of Australia .. .. 62 VIII. Organizing the Shearers .. .. .. 68 IX. A Fighting Union .. .. .. .. 80 X. The Employers and Freedom of Contract .. .. .. .. .. .. 94 XI. The Turning Point .. .. .. .. 111 XII. Incidents of the Big Strike .. .. 137 XIII. The Industrial Fight in Queensland 145 XIV. Law and its Administration .. .. 169 XV. The Press .. .. .. .. .. .. 195 XVI. Union Outrages .. .. .. .. .. 203 XVII. Catching “Scabs” .. .. .. .. 211 XVIII. Political Action .. .. .. .. .. 220 XIX. In New South Wales .. .. .. 230 XX. Queensland .
    [Show full text]
  • Unsound Minds’ from Populating the British World Australasian Immigration Control & Mental Illness 1830S —1920S
    Preventing ‘Unsound Minds’ From Populating the British World Australasian Immigration Control & Mental Illness 1830s —1920s Jennifer S. Kain PhD May 2015 Preventing ‘Unsound Minds’ From Populating the British World Australasian Immigration Control & Mental Illness 1830s —1920s Jennifer S. Kain A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the University of Northumbria at Newcastle for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Research undertaken in the Faculty of Arts, Design and Social Sciences May 2015 Abstract This thesis examines the bureaucratic controls designed to restrict the entry of migrants perceived to be ‘mentally ill’ into New Zealand and Australia in the period between the 1830s and 1920s. It is the first study to analyse the evolution of these practices in this region and timeframe. It addresses a gap in the current literature because it explores the tensions that emerged when officials tried to implement government policy. This study sheds new light on the actions, motivations and ideologies of the British and Australasian officials who were responsible for managing and policing immigration. While there were attempts to coordinate the work of border officials, this proved very difficult to achieve in practice: some immigration controllers were, for instance, receptive to the theories that were coming out of international debates about border control, others retained a parochial perspective. The thesis argues that every attempt to systematise border management failed. The regulation of the broad spectrum of ‘mental illness’ was a messy affair: officials struggled with ill-defined terminology and a lack of practical instructions so tensions and misunderstandings existed across local, national and metropolitan levels.
    [Show full text]
  • Religious Dynamics in Australian Federal Politics
    Department of the Parliamentary Library Informati nand Research Services For God and Countryo' Religious Dynamics in Australian Federal Politics Dr Marion Maddox 1999Australian Parliamentary Fellow Department of the Parliamentary Library For God and Country Religious Dynamics in Australian Federal Politics Dr Marion Maddox 1999 Australian Parliamentary Fellow ISBN 0-642-52724-5 © Commonwealth of Australia 2001 Except to the extent of the uses permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means including information storage and retrieval systems, without the prior written consent of the Department of the Parliamentary Library, other than by Senators and Members of the Australian Parliament in the course of their official duties. For God and Country: Religious Dynamics in Australian Federal Politics The views expressed in this publication are those of the author and may not be attributed to the Information and Research Services (IRS) or to the Department of the Parliamentary Library. Readers are reminded that the paper is not an official parliamentary or Australian government document. Presiding Officers' Foreword Established in 1971, the Australian Parliamentary Fellowship has provided an opportunity for an academic analysis of many aspects of Parliament and the work of Parliamentarians. The work of Dr Marion Maddox, the 1999 Fellow, has been the first to assess and set in context the religious influences felt by current and past Senators and Members as they pursue their parliamentary duties. With two doctorates (in theology and political philosophy) Dr Maddox brought both fields together in her Fellowship project. In for For God and Country: Religious Dynamics in Australian Federal Politics Dr Maddox explores religious influences and debate in and around the Thirty-Eighth and Thirty-Ninth Parliaments.
    [Show full text]
  • Australia's Watson Labor Government
    First in the World First in the World: Australia’s Watson Labor Government* Ross McMullin Last year the ALP commemorated a special anniversary. When Chris Watson and his ministers were sworn in on 27 April 1904, they were forming not just Australia’s first national Labor government. It was the first national labour government in the world. We were leading the world. It might be hard to imagine now, but the advent of the Watson government confirmed that a century ago Australia was leading the world in progressive government, in pioneering measures benefiting the working class. Remarkable as it may seem today, curious visitors crossed the globe to scrutinise this advanced social laboratory for themselves. The Labor Party’s rise was astonishing. Labor had only been formed 13 years earlier. Let’s focus on that with some comparative contemporary context. Think about parties formed relatively recently, like the Greens or the Democrats or even One Nation, and the struggle they have each had to become anything beyond a minor party in the Senate, where the proportional representation system enables them to pick up the odd * This paper was presented as a lecture in the Department of the Senate Occasional Lecture Series at Parliament House on 25 February 2005. 11 _____________________________________________________________________ seat, or at best a few seats here and there. None of them have ever looked remotely like becoming, in the national parliament, anything other than a minor upper house party. The contrast with Labor’s first years is stark. Here you have a brand new party, with not just different policies but a different look and feel, a different way of doing politics with novel features like party control of MPs and policy, caucus control of the parliamentary party, a pledge to enforce solidarity.
    [Show full text]
  • First in the World: Australia's Watson Labor Government
    First in the World First in the World: Australia’s Watson Labor Government* Ross McMullin Last year the ALP commemorated a special anniversary. When Chris Watson and his ministers were sworn in on 27 April 1904, they were forming not just Australia’s first national Labor government. It was the first national labour government in the world. We were leading the world. It might be hard to imagine now, but the advent of the Watson government confirmed that a century ago Australia was leading the world in progressive government, in pioneering measures benefiting the working class. Remarkable as it may seem today, curious visitors crossed the globe to scrutinise this advanced social laboratory for themselves. The Labor Party’s rise was astonishing. Labor had only been formed 13 years earlier. Let’s focus on that with some comparative contemporary context. Think about parties formed relatively recently, like the Greens or the Democrats or even One Nation, and the struggle they have each had to become anything beyond a minor party in the Senate, where the proportional representation system enables them to pick up the odd seat, or at best a few seats here and there. None of them have ever looked remotely like becoming, in the national parliament, anything other than a minor upper house party. * This paper was presented as a lecture in the Department of the Senate Occasional Lecture Series at Parliament House on 25 February 2005. 11 _____________________________________________________________________ The contrast with Labor’s first years is stark. Here you have a brand new party, with not just different policies but a different look and feel, a different way of doing politics with novel features like party control of MPs and policy, caucus control of the parliamentary party, a pledge to enforce solidarity.
    [Show full text]
  • Cross-Party Collaboration in the Australian Federal Parliament: Testing the Limits of Institutional Constraints and Enabling Factors
    Cross-Party Collaboration in the Australian Federal Parliament: Testing the Limits of Institutional Constraints and Enabling Factors Adele Lausberg A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, Department of Politics & International Studies, School of Social Sciences, Faculty of Arts, University of Adelaide. June 2018 Abstract This thesis identifies and explores the use of cross-party collaboration (CPC) in Australian politics. It investigates why politicians collaborate across party lines in the Australian Parliament and how this relates to political representation. Although there are some earlier examples, CPC rose to prominence when it was used to achieve legislative change in 2006 by four women Senators. These women employed CPC to circumvent institutional norms by presenting a co-sponsored bill concerning the medical abortion drug RU486. Their success contributed to an acceleration of CPC. This thesis finds that both women and men have become more likely to adopt the previously rare practice of CPC since 2006. The occurrence of CPC is stimulated by enabling factors which include: electoral shifts; a shared cosmopolitan outlook that compels actors to disregard localised party policies in favour of a higher universal law; and desire for community leadership. For women using CPC to represent women, there are some differences in the enabling factors: critical actors and a critical mass of women; minor parties; and parliamentary groups/committee minority reports. CPC has occurred despite the existence of institutional constraints which deter politicians from seeking collaboration across party lines. These constraints include: strict party discipline; party leadership style; and limitations in the norms, practices, and structure of parliament.
    [Show full text]
  • 7. Booze, Sex and God
    7. Booze, Sex and God Booze, sex and power suffused the old parliamentary building and they could be sensed particularly in the non-members’ bar. The entrace to the non-members’ bar was on the ground floor at the rear of the building, on one side of the two large courtyards, each dominated by a huge poplar tree dating back to the 1920s, planted during construction of the building. The non-members’ bar was the social centre for all who worked in the place, including the parliamentarians. They had their own bar, but often preferred the company available—particularly female—in the non-members’ bar. When the Parliament was sitting, the non- members’ bar was a busy meeting spot in the evening, right up to one hour after the house or the Senate rose—generally about 10.30 or 11 pm. When the bar closed, drinkers drifted off to various offices and drinking spots around the building. Like most licensed establishments throughout Australia at the time, here, ladies did not enter the bar. Off the non-members’ bar, a small room for ladies was served via a hatch from the bar. Here there were at least as many male drinkers as there were females. Some years later, the ladies’ ‘brown room’, as it was called, was shut and ladies came into the bar. The extra space was used to expand the non-members’ bar, which, although still crowded, was a little more comfortable. It was a place for gossip, tips and assignations, as well as for excessive drinking. The gallery, until the old building was vacated, was a very boozy establishment.
    [Show full text]
  • Democratic Experiments
    Papers on Parliament No. 44 January 2006 Democratic Experiments Lectures in the Senate Occasional Lecture Series 2004-2005 Published and printed by the Department of the Senate, Parliament House, Canberra ISSN 1031-976X Published by the Department of the Senate, 2006 Papers on Parliament is edited and managed by the Research Section, Department of the Senate. Edited by Kay Walsh All inquiries should be made to: Assistant Director of Research Procedure Office Department of the Senate Parliament House CANBERRA ACT 2600 Telephone: (02) 6277 3164 ISSN 1031–976X ii Contents Australia’s Representation Gap: A Role for Parliamentary Committees? Ian Marsh 1 First in the World: Australia’s Watson Labor Government Ross McMullin 11 Independents in Federal Parliament: A New Challenge or a Passing Phase? Jennifer Curtin 25 The Constitution We Were Meant To Have AJ Brown 41 The Court Politics of the Blair Presidency Rod Rhodes 67 Democratic Experiments in New Zealand Elizabeth McLeay 91 The Australias Are One: John West Guiding Colonial Australia to Nationhood Patricia Fitzgerald Ratcliff 105 Sir Robert Garran Leslie Zines 121 The New Centralism and the Collapse of the Conservative Constitution Greg Craven 133 Contents of previous issues of Papers on Parliament 151 To order copies of Papers on Parliament 158 List of Senate Briefs 159 iii Contributors Ian Marsh is Professor at the Graduate School of Government, University of Sydney. Ross McMullin is a free-lance historian whose most recent book is So Monstrous a Travesty: Chris Watson and the world’s first national labour government (2004). Jennifer Curtin is a lecturer in the Politics Program at Monash University.
    [Show full text]