DOCSLIB.ORG

A Governance Practitioner's Notebook

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Governance Practitioner's Notebook THE DAC NETWORK ON GOVERNANCE (GOVNET) A Governance Practitioner’s Notebook: Alternative Ideas and Approaches Alan Whaites, Eduardo Gonzalez, Sara Fyson and Graham Teskey A Governance Practitioner’s Notebook ALTERNATIVE IDEAS AND APPROACHES The opinions expressed and arguments employed herein are those of the authors, andThis are work designed is published to stimulate under discussion the responsibility on a broad of therange Secretary-General of issues. Accordingly, of the theyOECD. should The opinions not be reported expressed as andrepresenting arguments the employed official views herein ofdo the not OECD necessarily or of its memberreflect the countries. official views of OECD member countries. This document and any map included herein are without prejudice toto thethe statusstatus ofof oror sovereignty sovereignty over any territory, territory, to the delimitation of international frontiers andand boundariesboundaries and to the namename ofof anyany territory,territory, city city or or area. area. Please cite this publication as: OECD (2014), Accountability and Democratic Governance: Orientations and Principles for Development, DAC Guidelines and Reference Series, OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264183636-en ISBN 978-92-64-18362-9 (print) ISBN 978-92-64-18363-6 (PDF) Series: DAC Guidelines and Reference Series ISSN 1990-0996 (print) ISSN 1990-0988 (online) ThePlease statistical cite this data publication for Israel are as: supplied by and under the responsibility of the relevant IsraeliWhaites authorities. et al. The(2015), use A of Governance such data by Practitioner’s the OECD is without Notebook: prejudice Alternative to the statusIdeas ofand the Golan Heights, East Jerusalem and Israeli settlements in the West Bank under the terms of internationalApproaches law., OECD, Paris, http://www.oecd.org/dac/governance-peace/governance/ governance-practitioners-notebook.htm. Photo credits: Cover © Roman Dekan | Dreamstime.com. Corrigenda to OECD publications may be found on line at: www.oecd.org/about/publishing/corrigenda.htm. © OECD 20142015 You can copy, download or print OECD content for your own use, and you can include excerpts from OECD publications, databases and multimedia products in your own documents, presentations, blogs, websites and teaching materials, provided that suitable acknowledgment of the source and copyright owner is given. All requests for public or commercial use and translation rights should be submitted to [email protected]. Requests for permission to photocopy portions of this material for public or commercial use shall be addressed directly to the Copyright Clearance Center (CCC) at [email protected] or the Centre français d'exploitation du droit de copie (CFC) at [email protected]. Foreword Foreword The OECD-DAC Network on Governance (GovNet) is a forum for practitioners from the development co-operation agencies of Development Assistance Committee (DAC) countries. The members of GovNet work collaboratively with each other and with other bodies and platforms on issues of governance and institutional development. GovNet’s aim is to promote dialogue, knowledge exchange and research and it seeks to advance innovative approaches to these issues. This publication is unusual. GovNet has traditionally produced evaluations, guidance documents and summaries of “good practice”. We are, however, at an interesting time in the evolution of thinking on governance practice – for reasons that we hope become clear in the document itself. This publication takes a rather different approach by articulating the thoughts, aspirations and concerns of a newly inducted governance adviser employed by a fictitious development agency. Rather than offer any definitive answers, it tries to stimulate ideas and thinking. As Govnet is a network of practitioners, it is to them that this “Notebook” is primarily addressed, and it focuses on the challenges and dilemmas that they face. However, we are very aware that improved practice by aid actors is only part of the much broader development story. This always requires us to understand the challenges and dilemmas faced by others. While we have attempted to maintain a clear scope and focus in the notebook we are conscious of the need to engage with other networks such as the Effective Institutions Platform, with its emphasis on peer to peer learning. We have a joint responsibility to take forward the debate on alternative ideas and approaches. Above all this publication continues to stress the golden rule that supporting governance reform is first and foremost about laying aside preconceptions and listening to local counterparts. In offering this publication we seek to encourage debate. The process has been open and informal and has relied heavily on the goodwill and commitment of the many people involved. All of those who have contributed to this publication have done so as a personal contribution to the sector. GovNet is extremely grateful for their willingness to share their time and thoughts with practitioners. Therefore please note that the views expressed A GOVERNANCE PRACTITIONER’S NOTEBOOK: ALTERNATIVE IDEAS AND APPROACHES © OECD 2015 3 Foreword throughout the publication should be attributed to the authors alone. We hope that this Notebook also has resonance with the wider development community – adding to the lively debate that already exists. Graham Teskey and David Yang Co-Chairs, OECD DAC Network on Governance (GovNet) 4 A GOVERNANCE PRACTITIONER’S NOTEBOOK: ALTERNATIVE IDEAS AND APPROACHES © OECD 2015 AcknowledgeMents Acknowledgements The OECD-DAC Governance Network would like to thank the many contributors to this publication – all of whom offered their work as a contribu tion to the debate on support to governance reform. The report was completed under the responsibility of Alan Whaites (OECD). Eduardo Gonzalez and Alan Whaites brought together the work of so many contributors. Thanks are also owed to Cassandra Hendricks and our external editor Sally Hinchcliffe. GovNet is also grateful to the German Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ) which provided support for the design and printing of the publication. The cover design was by Stephanie Coic. Any errors or omissions remain the authors’ responsibility, and any opinions expressed and arguments employed do not necessarily reflect the views of the OECD nor those of its member countries. A GOVERNANCE PRACTITIONER’S NOTEBOOK: ALTERNATIVE IDEAS AND APPROACHES © OECD 2015 5 TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of contents About the authors. 11 Introduction. Lucy in the field with briefings . 15 Alan Whaites, Graham Teskey, Sara Fyson and Eduardo Gonzalez Memo to Lucy. Some reading for your assignment. 19 Alan Whaites Notes to self for my first overseas visit! . 27 Graham Teskey Section One Politics Notes to self – organisational politics . 43 Lucy It’s the politics! Can donors rise to the challenge? . 47 Sue Unsworth Mind the gaps: What’s missing in political economy analysis and why it matters ������������������� 67 David Hudson and Heather Marquette Putting political economy to use in aid policies ������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 83 Wil Hout Practitioner perspective: Politics on Monday morning ������������������������������������������������������������������� 99 Richard Butterworth A GOVERNANCE PRACTITIONER’S NOTEBOOK: ALTERNATIVE IDEAS AND APPROACHES © OECD 2015 7 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Two The Public Sector and Reform Notes to self – Public sector new institutional complexity action problems . 107 Lucy Achieving governance reforms under pressure to demonstrate results: Dilemma or new beginning?. .111 David Booth Building capability by delivering results: Putting Problem-Driven Iterative Adaptation (PDIA) principles into practice ����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 123 Matt Andrews, Lant Pritchett, Salimah Samji and Michael Woolcock Release the pressure on governance practitioners. 135 Frauke de Weijer and Volker Hauck Supporting “small” improvements in government functioning: A rough guide for development professionals. 151 Nick Manning Supporting “big” improvements in government functioning: How public sector management development specialists can harness the growing significance of country choice ����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 191 Nick Manning Accountability and service delivery in decentralising environments: Understanding context and strategically advancing reform ������������������������������������������������������� 219 Paul Smoke Practitioner’s perspective: Engaging in public-sector reform. 233 Chiara Bronchi and Marco Larizza Section Three Institutions and Stakeholders Notes to self – Empowered partners and voices ����������������������������������������������������������������������������� 245 Lucy The deeper struggle over country ownership ��������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 249 Thomas Carothers 8 A GOVERNANCE PRACTITIONER’S NOTEBOOK: ALTERNATIVE IDEAS AND APPROACHES © OECD 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS A force for emancipation: Squaring the circle of ownership and progress in the promotion of better governance ��������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 257 Jörn Grävingholt Media and communication in governance:
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Lessons for Emergent Post-Modern Democrats by Ken White
    Extreme Democracy 90 8 The dead hand of modern democracy: Lessons for emergent post-modern democrats By Ken White et us not be too hasty to bury the present; it’s not dead yet, and a pre- mortem might provide some useful information. Those of us moving L ahead ought to remember Santayana’s famous dictum, and meditate— deeply—on what, and whom, we might leave behind. Emergent democracy can augment and, perhaps, even gradually supplant outmoded forms of self-governance, but only if we appreciate why those forms were once “moded”—suited to their times and uses. After all, Democracy 2.0 (if we consider Athens “1.0”) has enjoyed a pretty good 220- year run, even with all its failings. Considering which critical functions of modern democracy deserve preservation in intent, if not in form, offers the opportunity to appreciate the rich complexity of democratic self-governance and its astonishingly diverse modes of participation and action. By attending to what made modern democracy successful we might learn a few lessons; extract some insights from the old model; and identify a few pitfalls we ought to avoid, even as we cheerfully acknowledge the inevitability of creating a new set of pitfalls. I draw on personal experience in arriving at this conclusion. Working in the United States on democratic reforms (including campaign financing) for many years, I came to appreciate the difference between “reform” and “redesign.” Although the former may occur more often in some limited way, the promise of the latter drives truly significant change. As Extreme Democracy 91 Buckminster Fuller said: “You never change things by fighting against the existing reality.
    [Show full text]
  • Prism Vol. 9, No. 2 Prism About Vol
    2 021 PRISMVOL. 9, NO. 2 | 2021 PRISM VOL. 9, NO. 2 NO. 9, VOL. THE JOURNAL OF COMPLEX OPER ATIONS PRISM ABOUT VOL. 9, NO. 2, 2021 PRISM, the quarterly journal of complex operations published at National Defense University (NDU), aims to illuminate and provoke debate on whole-of-government EDITOR IN CHIEF efforts to conduct reconstruction, stabilization, counterinsurgency, and irregular Mr. Michael Miklaucic warfare operations. Since the inaugural issue of PRISM in 2010, our readership has expanded to include more than 10,000 officials, servicemen and women, and practi- tioners from across the diplomatic, defense, and development communities in more COPYEDITOR than 80 countries. Ms. Andrea L. Connell PRISM is published with support from NDU’s Institute for National Strategic Studies (INSS). In 1984, Secretary of Defense Casper Weinberger established INSS EDITORIAL ASSISTANTS within NDU as a focal point for analysis of critical national security policy and Ms. Taylor Buck defense strategy issues. Today INSS conducts research in support of academic and Ms. Amanda Dawkins leadership programs at NDU; provides strategic support to the Secretary of Defense, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, combatant commands, and armed services; Ms. Alexandra Fabre de la Grange and engages with the broader national and international security communities. Ms. Julia Humphrey COMMUNICATIONS INTERNET PUBLICATIONS PRISM welcomes unsolicited manuscripts from policymakers, practitioners, and EDITOR scholars, particularly those that present emerging thought, best practices, or train- Ms. Joanna E. Seich ing and education innovations. Publication threshold for articles and critiques varies but is largely determined by topical relevance, continuing education for national and DESIGN international security professionals, scholarly standards of argumentation, quality of Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • What Is Good Governance?
    United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific What is Good Governance? Introduction institutes, religious leaders, finance institutions political parties, the military etc. The situation in urban areas is much more Recently the terms "governance" and "good complex. Figure 1 provides the governance" are being increasingly used in interconnections between actors involved in development literature. Bad governance is urban governance. At the national level, in being increasingly regarded as one of the addition to the above actors, media, root causes of all evil within our societies. lobbyists, international donors, multi-national Major donors and international financial corporations, etc. may play a role in decision- institutions are increasingly basing their aid making or in influencing the decision-making and loans on the condition that reforms that process. ensure "good governance" are undertaken. All actors other than government and the This article tries to explain, as simply as military are grouped together as part of the possible, what "governance" and "good "civil society." In some countries in addition to governance" means. the civil society, organized crime syndicates also influence decision-making, particularly in Governance urban areas and at the national level. Similarly formal government structures are The concept of "governance" is not new. It is one means by which decisions are arrived at as old as human civilization. Simply put and implemented. At the national level, "governance" means: the process of informal decision-making structures, such as decision-making and the process by "kitchen cabinets" or informal advisors may which decisions are implemented (or not exist. In urban areas, organized crime implemented).
    [Show full text]
  • The Politics of Poverty: Elites, Citizens and States
    The Politics of Poverty: Elites, Citizens and States Findings from ten years of DFID-funded research on Governance and Fragile States 2001–2010 A Synthesis Paper Acknowledgements This paper was written by DFID Research and Evidence Division Staff, with help and advice from Graeme Ramshaw of IDS and from the directors and staff of the four Re­ search centres. Disclaimer: This synthesis presents some key findings of DFID-funded research and the resulting policy recommendations of the researchers: it does not necessarily reflect DFID policy. Cover Photo: Justice and Peace Commissioners, Masisi, DR Congo. © Sarah MacGregor / DFID The Politics of Poverty: Elites, Citizens, and States EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Executive Summary Evidence shows that in order to deliver sustainable international development we must be able to understand and work with its politics. Governance describes the way countries and societies manage their affairs politically and the way power and authority are exercised. For the poorest and most vulnerable, the difference that good, or particularly bad, governance, makes to their lives is profound: the inability of government institutions to prevent conflict, provide basic security, or basic services can have life-or-death consequences; lack of opportunity can prevent generations of poor families from lifting themselves out of poverty; and the inability to grow economically and collect taxes can keep countries trapped in a cycle of aid-dependency. Understanding governance, therefore, is central to achieving development and ending conflict. During the 1990s donors came to realise that development required better ‘governance’, and DFID recognised early on the need to work with the research community to identify ways of improving governance for better development outcomes.
    [Show full text]
  • South Korea: Legal and Political Overtones of Defensive Democracy in a Divided Country South Korea Has Already Passed Samuel
    South Korea: Legal and Political Overtones of Defensive Democracy in a Divided Country KWANGSUP KIM South Korea has already passed Samuel Huntington’s two-turnover test for democratic consolidation, which occurred with the peaceful transitions of power in 1992 and 1996. This occurred despite the enduring military tension on the divided Korean peninsula. Huntington said that when a nation transitions from an “emergent democracy” to a “stable democracy,” its ruling parties must undergo two democratic and peaceful turnovers.1 However, there still exists heated controversy over whether the executive power violates democratic rule and human rights in the name of national security. This is despite the fact that the military authoritarian regime perished in 1987 and subsequent civilian governments have accomplished democratic reform. On November 6, 2013, the Ministry of Justice in South Korea petitioned to the Constitutional Court to rule on dissolving the minor Unified Progressive Party (UPP) for violating the “basic rules of democracy.”2 The ministry’s filing comes after the prosecution of indicted lawmaker, Lee Seok-ki of the UPP on September 5, 2013, on charges of conspiracy to stage a rebellion, incitement and sympathizing with North Korea, and infringement of the Kwangsup Kim is a Ph.D. Fellow at Center for Constitutional Democracy of Indiana University Maurer School of Law, an academic director and vice chairperson of the Committee of Women’s Rights at the Human Rights & Welfare Institution of Korea., and a Member of the Board of Directors at The Correction Welfare Society of Korea. 1 Samuel P. Huntington, “The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century.” Norman: University of Oklahoma Press 14 (1991): 26.
    [Show full text]
  • Legislating During War: Conflict and Politics in Colombia
    Legislating During War: Conflict and Politics in Colombia Juan S. Morales∗ Collegio Carlo Alberto University of Turin July 24, 2020 Abstract This paper studies how politicians and their constituents respond to political violence by investigating the case of the Colombian civil conflict. I use data on rebel attacks, legislators’ tweets and roll-call votes, and I employ event study and difference-in-differences empirical methods. Twitter engagement (as a proxy for popular support) increases after rebel attacks for both incumbent party legislators and for tweets with a "hard-line" language. Legislators increase their support for the incumbent party after attacks, but only when the government has a hard-line policy position, as inferred both from the recent historical context and from text analysis of the president’s tweets. Though the effects are initially large they last less than two weeks. The empirical results are consistent with a political economy model of legislative behaviour in which events that shift voters’ views, and the presence of rally ‘round the flag effects, elicit different politician responses depending on the policy position of the incumbent party. Finally, I identify a set of potentially affected congressional votes, suggesting that these conflict-induced swings in incumbent support can have persistent policy consequences. JEL Codes: D72;D74;H56;O10 Keywords: civil conflict; legislative decision-making; roll-call votes; political language; social media ∗Collegio Carlo Alberto, Piazza Arbarello 8, 10122, Torino, TO, Italy (e-mail: [email protected]). I thank the editor, Maria Petrova, and anonymous referees for their careful reviews and suggestions. I am grateful to Gustavo Bobonis, Albert Berry, Marco Gonzalez-Navarro and Michel Serafinelli for their guidance and support.
    [Show full text]
  • PDF Good Governance, Bad Governance
    RESEARCH ASSOCIATION for INTERDISCIPLINARY RMARA CH I 2021S STUDIES DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.4640767 Good Governance, Bad Governance: The Politics of Coronavirus Pandemic in Nigeria Muyiwa Samuel Adedayo The Polytechnic, Ibadan, Oyo State, Nigeria [email protected] ABSTRACT: This paper examines the influence of good governance on coronavirus pandemic in Nigeria. The kernel of this article is the intrinsic nexus between good governance, bad governance and coronavirus pandemic in a democratic state. It reviews articles on how democracy has influenced good governance and/or promotes bad governance. It examines the individual perspective and understanding of the virus, state of lockdown and the welfare of the populace by the political leaders; to what extent is the palliative being distributed among other welfare packages useful to the populace. The paper clearly explained the notion of good governance in the context of the Nigerian milieu and links it with how welfare of the citizens could assist in building their confidence. The paper provided evidence from around the world of the nexus between the three variables under examination and it shows that there is a yawning gap in trust and accountability between citizens and the government because the need of the populace has overtime been ignored and neglected by government. This is evident in that Nigeria is yet to comply with the inextricable indices of good governance due to lack of trust and committed leadership. The paper recommended amongst others that government and political leaders, as well as the institutions in the country, must strive to promote participatory, consensus-oriented, accountability, transparency, responsiveness, effectiveness and efficiency; equitable, inclusive and follows the rule of law to deliver good governance in Nigeria, and Africa in general.
    [Show full text]
  • The United States, Eduardo Frei's Revolution in Liberty and The
    The Gathering Storm: The United States, Eduardo Frei's Revolution in Liberty and the Polarization of Chilean Politics, 1964-1970 A dissertation presented to the faculty of the College of Arts and Sciences of Ohio University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy Sebastian Hurtado-Torres December 2016 © 2016 Sebastian Hurtado-Torres. All Rights Reserved. 2 This dissertation titled The Gathering Storm: The United States, Eduardo Frei's Revolution in Liberty, and the Polarization of Chilean Politics, 1964-1970 by SEBASTIAN HURTADO-TORRES has been approved for the Department of History and the College of Arts and Sciences by Patrick Barr-Melej Associate Professor of History Robert Frank Dean, College of Arts and Sciences 3 ABSTRACT HURTADO-TORRES, SEBASTIAN, Ph.D., December 2016, History The Gathering Storm: The United States, Eduardo Frei’s Revolution in Liberty, and the Polarization of Chilean Politics, 1964-1970 Director of Dissertation: Patrick Barr-Melej This dissertation explores the involvement of the United States in Chilean politics between the presidential campaign of 1964 and Salvador Allende’s accession to the presidency in 1970. The main argument of this work is that the partnership between the Christian Democratic Party of Chile (PDC) and the United States in this period played a significant role in shaping Chilean politics and thus contributed to its growing polarization. The alliance between the PDC and the United States was based as much on their common views on communism as on their shared ideas about modernization and economic development. Furthermore, the U.S. Embassy in Santiago, headed by men strongly committed to the success of the Christian Democratic project, involved itself heavily in the inner workings of Chilean politics as an informal actor, unable to dictate terms but capable of exerting influence on local actors whose interests converged with those of the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Corruption and Governance
    Political Corruption and Governance Series Editors Dan Hough University of Sussex Brighton, UK Paul M. Heywood University of Nottingham Nottingham, UK This series aims to analyse the nature and scope of, as well as possible remedies for, political corruption. The rise to prominence over the last 20 years of corruption-related problems and of the ‘good governance’ agenda as the principal means to tackle them has led to the develop- ment of a plethora of (national and international) policy proposals, inter- national agreements and anti-corruption programmes and initiatives. National governments, international organisations and NGOs all now claim to take very seriously the need to tackle issues of corruption. It is thus unsurprising that over couple of decades, a signifcant body of work with a wide and varied focus has been published in academic journals and in international discussion papers. This series seeks to provide a forum through which to address this growing body of literature. It invites not just in-depth single country analyses of corruption and attempts to com- bat it, but also comparative studies that explore the experiences of dif- ferent states (or regions) in dealing with different types of corruption. We also invite monographs that take an overtly thematic focus, analysing trends and developments in one type of corruption across either time or space, as well as theoretically informed analysis of discrete events. More information about this series at http://www.palgrave.com/gp/series/14545 Richard Rose · Caryn Peiffer Bad
    [Show full text]
  • “Small” Improvements in Government Functioning
    Supporting “SMall” IMproveMents in governMent functioning Supporting “small” improvements in government functioning: A rough guide for development professionals1 Nick Manning 1. Introduction This rough guide offers advice to development specialists seeking to support modest public sector management (PSM) reforms. The first part of this chapter offers suggestions for governance practitioners – emphasising the importance of understanding the technical domain, of practising enthusiastic scepticism as a response to the acknowledged difficulties of the field, of acting with conviction but without professional ego and of recognising the power of honest contestation in a territory which has some entrenched fault lines. In the second part I offer ideas for managing the product, concluding that while it is unlikely that any programme will be right first time, it is important to get it as right as possible about what it is that needs to be fixed, to build in enough flexibility (of ends as well as means) into the project design and to have a working theory about why autonomous individuals might want to change their behaviour as a result of the programme The starting point for this discussion is that in a development context, asserting that your task is in some way to help the public sector work better – casting light on the darkest parts of the bureaucratic black box – elicits broadly similar responses. You will hear that it is vital. Everyone is quick to assure development professionals working on this area that development is significantly a function of public sector capacity and that governments work better if budgets are better prepared and financial management systems better operated, if arrangements are in place to ensure that skilled staff are recruited on merit and rewarded for doing well, if revenues are raised more equitably and efficiently, and maybe you will even hear that it is important that social and economic regulation is managed more productively.
    [Show full text]
  • Philosophy & Social Criticism
    Philosophy & Social Criticism http://psc.sagepub.com/ Apathy: the democratic disease Jeffrey E. Green Philosophy Social Criticism 2004 30: 745 DOI: 10.1177/0191453704045763 The online version of this article can be found at: http://psc.sagepub.com/content/30/5-6/745 Published by: http://www.sagepublications.com Additional services and information for Philosophy & Social Criticism can be found at: Email Alerts: http://psc.sagepub.com/cgi/alerts Subscriptions: http://psc.sagepub.com/subscriptions Reprints: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsReprints.nav Permissions: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav >> Version of Record - Dec 6, 2004 What is This? Downloaded from psc.sagepub.com at UNIV OF PENNSYLVANIA on May 6, 2013 12 045763 (to/d) 2/9/04 11:38 am Page 745 Jeffrey E. Green Apathy: the democratic disease Abstract This essay turns to ancient sources in order to rethink the relation- ship between political apathy and democracy. If modern democratic theorists place political apathy entirely outside of democracy – either as a destructive limit upon the full realization of a democratic polity, or, more sanguinely, as a pragmatic necessity which tempers democracy so that it may function in a workable yet watered-down form – the ancients conceived of political apathy as a peculiarly democratic phenomenon that was likely to flourish in tandem with the expansion of egalitarian institutional structures and moral ideas. Evidence for the ancient recognition of political apathy as a uniquely demo- cratic kind of affliction centers on, but is not limited to, three main sources. In literature, the Homeric epic, and specifically the story of Achilles, present apathy for politics and commitment to human equality as synonymous forces.
    [Show full text]
  • Good Governance: the Inflation of an Idea Faculty Research Working Paper Series
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Research Papers in Economics Good Governance: The Inflation of an Idea Faculty Research Working Paper Series Merilee Grindle Harvard Kennedy School June 2010 RWP10-023 The views expressed in the HKS Faculty Research Working Paper Series are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect those of the John F. Kennedy School of Government or of Harvard University. Faculty Research Working Papers have not undergone formal review and approval. Such papers are included in this series to elicit feedback and to encourage debate on important public policy challenges. Copyright belongs to the author(s). Papers may be downloaded for personal use only. www.hks.harvard.edu Good Governance: The Inflation of an Idea Merilee Grindle Harvard University May 2008 Good governance is a good idea. We would all be better off, and citizens of many developing countries would be much better off, if public life were conducted within institutions that were fair, judicious, transparent, accountable, participatory, responsive, well-managed, and efficient. For the millions of people throughout the world who live in conditions of public insecurity and instability, corruption, abuse of law, public service failure, poverty, and inequality, good governance is a mighty beacon of what ought to be. Due to this intuitive appeal, good governance has grown rapidly to become a major ingredient in analyses of what’s missing in countries struggling for economic and political development. Researchers have adopted the concept as a way of exploring institutional failure and constraints on growth.
    [Show full text]