Misophonia phenomenology and impact

Misophonia phenomenology, impact, and clinical correlates

James M. Claiborn1, Thomas H. Dozier2,

1Independent practice, South Portland, ME, USA 2Misophonia Institute, Livermore, CA, USA

*Corresponding author: James M. Claiborn, 6 D St. South Portland ME 04106, USA phone: 1- 207-799-0408, fax: 1-207-767-7002, email: [email protected]

Key Words: misophonia, anger, , phenomenology, impairment

Conflict of Interest: Thomas Dozier is a misophonia treatment provider and owner of several smartphone apps directed toward individuals with misophonia.

1 Misophonia phenomenology and impact

Abstract

This research study was conducted to determine the effect on quality of life and gather information about the characteristics of misophonia. It was a large scale, online survey with over 1,000 respondents. The key findings were as follows. 1) People suffering with misophonia experience a reduced quality of life. 2) Misophonia can develop at any age, with the median and mode age of onset at 9-10 years. 3) Treatments to date had been generally ineffective, but some reported treatment being very helpful. 4) Eating stimuli are by far the most common, with 96% of people reporting this trigger. 5) Most people reported physical reactions as a part of their response to triggers.

2 Misophonia phenomenology and impact

If you are looking for a definition of misophonia, it is a severe sensitivity to specific soft sounds and visual images. It also includes other forms of stimuli that cause an immediate extreme reaction. When a person hears the sounds, the person has a very strong emotional reaction such as hate, anger, , rage, and resentment. People who suffer with misophonia often report that they feel the person is intentionally making the sound, even though when they are calm and away from the sound, they acknowledge that the conclusion at that time was not accurate.

A person experiencing misophonia generally has excellent hearing. It is not a sensitivity to the volume of sound, but an emotional and physiological reaction to specific sounds. At first it is generally the sounds of specific individuals that cause the reaction, but it usually spreads to the sounds made by others and to additional sounds. The chewing sound of a friend may be annoying, while the chewing sound of a parent elicits (forces automatically) a strong reaction and is intolerable.

2What causes misophonia? The misophonic reaction appears to be an involuntary physical and emotional reflex caused by the sound. The sound directly activates the Autonomic Nervous

System which is located in the brain stem and the Limbic System which is associated with emotion. This is a direct connection between the sound and a reflex reaction. Think of the sound as causing the same reaction as a hard poke in the ribs with a stick.

Behavior science explains this physiological reaction as a “respondent” or “reflex” behavior that has been acquired or developed by pairing the sound with a distressed (stress, anxiety, etc.) physiological condition. When these two things happen at the same time (distress and the

3 Misophonia phenomenology and impact sound), it creates neurological wiring in the brain that causes the misophonia reaction when the sound is heard again. I call this an acquired reflex because it is not an innate or inborn reaction

(did not exist at birth). It is a reflex because it is a direct connection from a sense (hearing) to the Autonomic Nervous System and the Lymbic System.

We see that misophonia is actually a double reflex. We think of misophonia as an extreme emotional (reflex) response, and it is. The brain imaging study by Dr. Sukhbinder Kumar, The

Brain Basis of Misophonia (2017) provides evidence for the emotional reflex response of misophonia, and it is driven by the vmPFC which is an emotional learning brain structure. But there appears to also be a physical reflex that occurs, which is usually a skeletal muscle flinch.

The physical reflex can also be deeper inside the body. There are reports of individuals with stomach, intestine, or esophagus constriction, urge to urinate, or a sexual sensation. This will be discussed more on other pages. A study of the physical reflex of misophonia (Dozier &

Morrision, 2017, Phenomenology of Misophonia: Initial Physical and Emotional Responses) was published in the American Journal of Psychology.

Once again, what causes misophonia? Misophonia seems to occur more frequently in a person with a higher level of anxiety, stress, or compulsive behavior. The reaction often develops first to a parent or family member where the person has a high level of anxiety or distress

(physiological state of distress) and they repeatedly hear the sound. It also seems to happen when a person cannot escape from the sound, such as at the dinner table, in a car, or even laying in bed. In rare cases, the original misophonia trigger has been a repeating visual image

(body movement).

4 Misophonia phenomenology and impact

With most sounds, the sound is taken into the brain and then the person makes a thoughtful response. The person considers the meaning of the sound and then responds. This is called a

“high road” response. (It goes through the higher part of the brain before the person reacts.) For example, a person says to you, “I hate you.” You have to first think about the words and the meaning. You then respond based on the meaning. In this case, if words are a reply to “Your feet stink,” then you know it is joking or name calling, and you don’t have a negative emotional response. If you perceive the person is serious and the person is important to you, then you may have a strong, negative emotional response, such as crying.

Once the misophonic response is established for one sound, other sounds seem to be added over time. Because of this, those with misophonia often have a number of sounds that cause the reflex reaction, and it may impact many aspects of their lives. Without treatment, the prognosis for misophonia is grim. The misophonic responses usually get worse and worse, and the negative impact on the person’s life gets progressively greater.

Prevalence of Misophonia

How common is misophonia? Many consider it a rare disease, and on rare disease day (the last day of February), many on the Facebook misophonia group express a desire to speak out about misophonia. In the United States, a rare disease has officially been defined as one that affects less than 200,000 people in the US, which is about one in 1,500 people (0.07%). By this definition misophonia is not a rare disease. It is a “rarely known” disorder.

5 Misophonia phenomenology and impact

I did my first survey on misophonia in February of 2013 on different characteristics of individuals with misophonia. I was trying to determine how misophonia develops and if there were certain characteristics people with misophonia have in common. I wanted to have a control group to compare some of the personality traits and characteristics, and so I sent the survey to my LinkedIn contacts. Much to my surprise, 5% of my LinkedIn contacts had misophonic reactions. And so I thought, wow, this is not some extremely unusual phenomenon here. In fact,

I had people with misophonia popping up all over the place.

I paid for a survey using SurveyMonkey.com, where they randomly solicited individuals who had no connection to misophonia. These were just individuals who were willing to fill out surveys to have fifty cents donated to the cause of their choice. I purchased three hundred and I got ten extra for free. I made sure that the title of the survey did not mention sound or sensitivities. I gave the same survey to a group of people with misophonia to determine a standard of reference for my Survey Monkey group. Out of the 310 people surveyed (50% of them women, 50% men), I found that 15.2% had reactions suggesting misophonia. It was more common among the women (18.6%) than it was among of the men (11.6%).[i] Rather than being a rare disease, which is one in 1,500, it was a rarely known but common disorder with about 225 in 1,500 having misophonia.

That was actually a higher number that I expected. I was expecting 5% to 10%, but it came in at

15%. In 2014, there was a published peer-reviewed study that came out of the University of

South Florida’s College of and their psychology department. They used undergraduate psychology students. (This is very common in college research; they give

6 Misophonia phenomenology and impact psychology students a little extra credit for taking a survey or participating in some form of research for the graduate students.) They had almost 500 participants in this study, and 84% were women. Their study was comprehensive enough to see how the misophonia affected the individual’s life. They found that 20% had clinically significant misophonia,[ii] significant meaning they had to spend a good deal of conscious energy resisting or being affected by triggers. They did not find any statistical difference in the prevalence of misophonia in men vs. women.

A recent blog post on the family ancestry website 23andMe.com mentioned an internal study conducted with about 80,000 customers, in which people were asked “Does the sound of other people chewing fill you with rage? (Yes/No/Not Sure).” About 19% replied yes. They also found that the affirmative response was more common in women.[iii] 23andMe reported 20% yes and 80% no (excluding the not sure responses). One internet post indicated there were about

4% not sure. So that would reduce the percentage of “yes” responses from 20% to 19%.

A 2015 PhD dissertation on decreased sound tolerance (, tinnitus, and misophonia) reported 15.6% of participants with clinically significant misophonia, in a mix of college students and community participants[iv]. A higher percentage of males reported misophonia symptoms, but females reported greater severity. This provides further support for the surprisingly high prevalence of misophonia.

The takeaway from this is that misophonia is really quite common – perhaps affecting approximately 15% of adults (or 1 in 6.5 adults). It seems to be more common (or at least more

7 Misophonia phenomenology and impact severe) in women than in men, but many, many people suffer in silence, or they are written off as being grouchy, cranky, or irritable. If this number is correct, and research is beginning to confirm it is, there could be forty million people with misophonia in the United States alone – that is 40,000,000 people.

Considering these statistics and the fact that misophonia is not widely studied, if you randomly selected a doctor or therapist and then another individual, it is more likely that the random individual would have misophonia than the doctor or therapist would know about misophonia.

8 Misophonia phenomenology and impact

Figure 1. Annual rate of onset of misophonia of study participants (n = 1042)

Percent Trigger sound (N = 1,061) Mouth sounds, such as chewing, 96.5% crunching food, lip smacking, slurping, tongue clicking, or throat clearing Breathing sounds, such as gasping, 83.3% wheezing, sniffing, or other loud mouth sounds Mechanical sounds made by hand, such as 67.3% keyboard clicking, pen clicking, pencil tapping, crinkling paper, or nail clipping Foot sounds, such as tapping, stomping, 59.5% shuffling, or squeaking shoes Hand sounds, such as finger snapping, 58.7% tapping, or rubbing. Speech sounds, such as consonant sounds 31.5% (s, k, p, etc.) or mispronunciation of words

9 Misophonia phenomenology and impact

Mechanical sounds without people 38.3% involved, such as clock ticking, copy machine noise, or phone ringing Joint sounds, such as knuckle cracking 36.9% Other sounds 27.6%

References

Anderson, M. (2015). Men catch up with women on overall social media use. Retrived from

http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2015/08/28/men-catch-up-with-women-on-overall-

social-media-use

Barnes, A. L., Murphy, M. E., Fowler, C. A., & Rempfer, M. V. (2012). Health-related quality

of life and overall life satisfaction in people with serious mental illness. Schizophrenia

research and treatment, 2012. Retrieved from

http://www.hindawi.com/journals/schizort/2012/245103/ doi:10.1155/2012/245103

Bernstein, R. M., Angell, K. L., & Dehle, C. M. (2013). A brief course of cognitive behavioural

for the treatment of misophonia: a case example. The Cognitive Behaviour Therapist, 6, 1-

13. doi: 10.1017/S1754470X13000172

Cavanna, A. E., (2014). What is misophonia and how can we treat it? Expert Review of

Neurotherapeutics, 14, 357-359. doi: 101586/147375.2014.892418

Cima, R. F. F., Andersson, G., Schmidt, C. J., & Henry, J. A. (2014). Cognitive-Behavioral

treatment for tinnitus: A review of the literature. Journal of the American Academy of

Audiology, 25, 29-61. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.25.1.4

10 Misophonia phenomenology and impact

Donahoe, J. W., & Vegas, R. (2004). Pavlovian conditioning: The CS-UR relation. Journal Of

Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 30(1), 17-33. doi:10.1037/0097-

7403.30.1.17

Dozier, T. H. (2015a). Counter Conditioning treatment for misophonia. Clinical Case Studies,

14, 1-14. doi; 10.1177/1534650114566924

Dozier, T. H. (2015b). Etiology, composition, development and maintenance of misophonia: A

conditioned aversive reflex disorder. Psychological Thought, 8, 1-16. doi:

10.5964/psyct.v8i1.132

Dozier, T. H. (2015c). Treating the initial physical reflex of misophonia with the neural

repatterning technique: A counterconditioning procedure. Psychological Thought, 8(2),

189–210. doi:10.5964/psyct.v8i2.138

Dozier, T. H. (2015d). Understanding and Overcoming Misophonia, A Conditioned Aversive

Reflex Disorder. Livermore, CA: Misophonia Treatment Institute.

Edelstein, M., Brang, D., Rouw, R., & Ramachandran, V.S. (2013). Misophonia: Physiological

investigations and case descriptions. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7(296), 1-11. doi:

10.3389/fnhum.2013.00296

Endicott, J., Nee, J., Harrison, W., & Blumenthal, R (1993). Quality of life enjoymeGnt and

satisfaction questionnaire: A new measure. Psychopharmacology Bulletin, 29, 321-326.

Ferreira, G. M., Harrison, B. J., & Fontenelle, L. F. (2013). Hatred of sounds: misophonic

disorder or just an underreported psychiatric symptom. Annals of Clinical

Psychiatry, 25(4), 271-274.

11 Misophonia phenomenology and impact

Goodman, W. K., Price, L. H., Rasmussen, S. A., Mazure, C., Fleischmann, R. L., Hill, C. L., ...

& Charney, D. S. (1989). The Yale-Brown obsessive compulsive scale: I. Development,

use, and reliability. Archives of general , 46(11), 1006-1011.

Jasterboff, M. M., & Jasterboff, P. J. (2002). Decreased sound tolerance and tinnitus retraining

(TRT). The Australian and New Zealand Journal of , 24, 74-84.

Jastreboff, M.M., & Jastreboff, P.J. (2014). Treatments for decreased sound tolerance

(hyperacusis and misophonia). Seminars in Hearing 35(2), 105-120. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-

1372527

Johnson, P. L., Webber, T. AJ., ., Wu, M. S., Lewin, A. B., Murphy, T. K., & Storch, E. A.

(2013). When selective audiovisual stimuli become unbearable: A case series on pediatric

misophonia. Neuropsychiatry, 3, 1-7.

Martinez-Devesa, P., Perera, R, Theoudoulou, M, & Waddell, A. (2010). Cognitive behavioural

therapy for tinnitus. Cochrane Database of Systematic reviews.

doi:10.1002.14651858.CD005233.pub3

McGuire, J. F., Wu, M. A., & Storch, E. A. (2015). Cognitive-Behavioral therapy for 2 youths

with misophonia. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 76, 573-574. doi: 10.4088/JCP14cr09343

Neal, M., & Cavanna, A. E. (2013). Selective sound sensitivity syndrome (misophonia) in a

patient with Tourette’s syndrome. The Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical

Neurosciences, 25, E01-E01. doi: 10.1176/appi.neuropsych.11100235

Pallanti, S., DeCaria, C. M., Grant, J.E., Urpe, M., & Hollander, E. (2005). Reliability and

validity of the pathological gambling adaptation of the Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive

Scale (PG-YBOCS). Journal of Gambling Studies, 21(4), 431–43.

Philips, K. A., Hollander, E., Rasmussen, S. A., & Aronowitz, B. R. (1997). A severity rating

12 Misophonia phenomenology and impact

scale for body dysmorphic disorder: Development, reliability, and validity of a modified

version of the Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale. Psychopharmacology Bulletin,

33 (1), 17–22.

Rapaport, M. H., Clary, C., Fayyad, R., & Endicott, J. (2005). Quality-of-life impairment in

depressive and anxiety disorders. American Journal of Psychiatry, 162(6), 1171-1178.

Schröder, A., Vulink, N., & Denys, S. (2013). Misophonia: Diagnostic criteria for a new

psychiatric disorder. PLoS ONE 8, e54706. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0054706

Schwartz, P., Lyendecker, J., & Conlon, M. (2011). Hyperacusis and misophonia: The lesser

known siblings of tinnitus. Minnesota Medicine, Retrieved from

http://www.minnesotamedicine.com/Past-Issues/Past-Issues-2011/November-

2011/Hyperacusis-and-Misophonia

Taylor, S., Conelea, C. A., McKay, D., Crowe, K. B., & Abramowitz, J. S. (2014). Sensory

intolerance: latent structure and psychopathologic correlates. Comprehensive psychiatry,

55(5), 1279-1284.

Webber, T. A., Johnson, P. L., & Storch, E. A. (2014). Pediatric misophonia with comorbid

obsessive–compulsive spectrum disorders. General hospital psychiatry, 36(2), 231-e1.

Wu, M. S., Lewin, A. B., Murphy, T. K., & Storch, E. A. (2014) Misophonia, incidence,

phenomenology, and clinical correlates in an undergraduate student sample. Journal of

Clinical Psychology, 70, 994-1007. doi: 10.1002/jclp.22098

Wyrwich, K. W., Harnam, N., Revicki, D. A., Locklear, J. C., Svedsater, H., & Endicott, J.

(2011). Assessment of quality of life enjoyment and satisfaction questionnaire-short form

responder thresholds in generalized and

studies. International clinical psychopharmacology, 26(3), 121-129.

13