DOCSLIB.ORG

Dirac-Born-Infeld Actions and the Dilaton in N=2 Supersymmetry

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Dirac-Born-Infeld Actions and the Dilaton in N=2 Supersymmetry Dirac-Born-Infeld actions and the dilaton in N=2 Supersymmetry Nicola Ambrosetti Institute for Theoretical Physics Albert Einstein Center for fundamental physics University of Bern SUSY 2010, Bonn Based on: NA, Antoniadis, Derendinger, Tziveloglou, \Nonlinear Supersymmetry, Brane-bulk Interactions and Super-Higgs without Gravity" (arXiv:0911.5212) and \The Hypermultiplet with Heisenberg Isometry in N=2 Global and Local Supersymmetry" (arXiv:1005.0323) N. Ambrosetti (Bern U.) DBI and dilaton in N=2 SUSY 2010, Bonn 1 / 11 General setting Type II string compactifications on Calabi-Yau to D = 4 ) N = 2 supersymmetry in the bulk D-branes break half of supersymmetry which is then nonlinearly realised on their worldvolume Gauge field on D-brane described by Dirac-Born-Infeld (DBI) action Complete effective action includes a topological term with coupling to RR fields Dilaton belongs to Universal Hypermultiplet, which has Heisenberg symmetry preserved in string perturbation theory Shift symmetries of the Universal Hypermultiplet allow dualisation of one or two scalars into two-forms ) single-tensor or double-tensor descriptions N. Ambrosetti (Bern U.) DBI and dilaton in N=2 SUSY 2010, Bonn 2 / 11 Description Global N = 2 supersymmetry realised on N = 1 superfields Hypermultiplet dualised into single-tensor to allow off-shell supersymmetric description DBI and nonlinear supersymmetry introduced by constrained superfields Lagrangian given by supersymmetrisation of b ^ F interaction with one linear and one nonlinear supersymmetry Nonlinear N = 2 vector multiplet coupled to full single-tensor: no orientifold truncation Bosonic fields are: In abelian vector: Aµ (Fµν) and the auxiliary d2. In single-tensor: bµν , C (dilaton),Φ (complex RR scalar), 4-form Cµνρσ (see later). N. Ambrosetti (Bern U.) DBI and dilaton in N=2 SUSY 2010, Bonn 3 / 11 Dilaton-Brane coupling and DBI After integration of auxiliary field d2 the bosonic Lagrangian is p Re φ h q C 2 q i LDBI ;bos: = 4κ 1 − 1 + 2(Re φ)2 − det(ηµν + 2 2κFµν) κ 1 1 + µνρσ Im φ F F − b F + C 4 µν ρσ 4 µν ρσ 24κ µνρσ κ (mass−2) is the nonlinear scale. We recovered the DBI action with field dependent coefficient in front of the square root generated by integration of auxiliary field P F Full topological term ∼ k Ck ^ e Invariance under non-linearly realised 2nd SUSY C arises as the MP ! 1 limit of the dilaton for a quaternionic-K¨ahlermanifold with Heisenberg symmetry (in string perturbation theory) [AADT, 1005.0323] N. Ambrosetti (Bern U.) DBI and dilaton in N=2 SUSY 2010, Bonn 4 / 11 Analysis of the vacuum: super-Higgs without gravity There is a scalar potential "s # Re φ C 2 V (C; Re φ) = 1 + − 1 4κ 2(Re φ)2 Im φ is a flat direction. SUSY vacuum at hCi = 0, for any value of Re φ. Properties of SUSY vacuum: φ is massless 2 1 C is massive mC = 4κhRe φi , same mass as the vector Partial breaking of supersymmetry N = 2 to N = 1 Gaugino transforms as a goldstino, but is not massless The mixing term χλ gave a mass to the gaugino, but 2nd SUSY preserved since its variation is canceled by the variation of the 4-form. N. Ambrosetti (Bern U.) DBI and dilaton in N=2 SUSY 2010, Bonn 5 / 11 Realisation of N = 2 on N = 1 superfields Off-shell realisation with two real N = 1 superfields V1, V2 (16B + 16F ): p ∗ i ∗ δ V1 = −p (ηD − ηD)V2 ; δ V2 = 2i(ηD − ηD)V1 2 Works for two off-shell N = 2 multiplets (not for hypermultiplets): 1 Impose supersymmetric constraint on V1 and V2: V1 = L linear( DDL = 0), V2 = Φ + Φ, Φ chiral. ) Single-tensor multiplet (L; Φ), 8B + 8F off-shell. Bosons: real C, complexΦ, bµν with δbµν = 2@[µΛν], auxiliary fΦ. 2 Impose gauge invariance on V1 and V2 Use the single-tensor (Λ`; Λc ) as gauge parameters: δgauge V1 = Λ` ; δgauge V2 = Λc + Λc ) N = 2 abelian vector multiplet, 8B + 8F off-shell. N. Ambrosetti (Bern U.) DBI and dilaton in N=2 SUSY 2010, Bonn 6 / 11 The constrained vector multiplet Gauge invariant vector multiplet: 1 1 X = DDV ; W = − DDD V : 2 1 α 4 α 2 Can be embedded into usual N = 2 chiral superfield p α 1 W = X + 2iθe Wα − θeθeDDX 4 Nonlinear supersymmetry can be obtained imposing a quadratic constraint 1 2 1 1 1 W − θeθe = W2 − θeθeW = 0 () WW − X DDX = X 2κ κ 2 κ Need to deform the 2nd SUSY transformation of Wα Gaugino transforms as a goldstino. Solution of the constraint X (WW ) contains the Born-Infeld N. Ambrosetti (Bern U.) DBI and dilaton in N=2 SUSY 2010, Bonn 7 / 11 Single-tensor version II The N = 1 superfields( L; Φ) supersymmetrise Hµνρ = 3@[µBνρ] with 8B + 8F off-shell. To supersymmetrise bµν one needs 16B + 16F with gauge invariance: α α_ (Y ; χα; Φ) with L = D χα − Dα_ χ and Y a chiral superfield containing the four-form Cµνρσ We can construct a chiral N = 2 superfield p α i 1 Y = Y + 2θe χα − θeθe Φ + DDY 2 4 Bosonic fields: N = 1 superfield Field Gauge invariance Number of fields χα bµν δbµν = 2 @[µΛν] 6B − 3B = 3B C 1B Φ Φ 2B fΦ 2B (auxiliary) Y Cµνρσ δ Cµνρσ = 4 @[µΛνρσ] 1B − 1B = 0B N. Ambrosetti (Bern U.) DBI and dilaton in N=2 SUSY 2010, Bonn 8 / 11 Supersymmetric coupling D-brane gauge field is described by constrained vector multiplet 1 2 Wnl = W − 2κ θeθe, Wnl = 0 Dilaton multiplet is described by single-tensor Y N = 2 Supersymmetric coupling with one linear and one nonlinear supersymmetry is given by Z 2 2 L = d θd θeiYWnl + c:c: + single-tensor kinetic terms which is the supersymmetrisation of b ^ F (Chern-Simons). N. Ambrosetti (Bern U.) DBI and dilaton in N=2 SUSY 2010, Bonn 9 / 11 Conclusions Global N = 2 supersymmetry and Heisenberg symmetry uniquely determine the form of the theory Generalized the derivation of the DBI from constrained superfields to the coupling to the dilaton (single-tensor) with one linear and one nonlinear supersymmetry Nonlinear N = 2 vector multiplet coupled to full single-tensor: no orientifold truncation needed New super-Higgs without gravity Low energy effective theory description of string theory compactified on rigid Calabi-Yau including perturbative corrections N. Ambrosetti (Bern U.) DBI and dilaton in N=2 SUSY 2010, Bonn 10 / 11 Web of supersymmetric dualities Double-tensor (L; L0) 6 ? Single-tensor ST-ST duality Single-tensor E-M duality Magnetic dual St¨uckelberg Chern-Simons - Single-tensor - gauging (L; Φ) (L; Φ) (L0; Φ0) 6 ? Hypermultiplet (Φ; Φ0) N. Ambrosetti (Bern U.) DBI and dilaton in N=2 SUSY 2010, Bonn 11 / 11.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Compactifying M-Theory on a G2 Manifold to Describe/Explain Our World – Predictions for LHC (Gluinos, Winos, Squarks), and Dark Matter
    Compactifying M-theory on a G2 manifold to describe/explain our world – Predictions for LHC (gluinos, winos, squarks), and dark matter Gordy Kane CMS, Fermilab, April 2016 1 OUTLINE • Testing theories in physics – some generalities - Testing 10/11 dimensional string/M-theories as underlying theories of our world requires compactification to four space-time dimensions! • Compactifying M-theory on “G2 manifolds” to describe/ explain our vacuum – underlying theory - fluxless sector! • Moduli – 4D manifestations of extra dimensions – stabilization - supersymmetry breaking – changes cosmology first 16 slides • Technical stuff – 18-33 - quickly • From the Planck scale to EW scale – 34-39 • LHC predictions – gluino about 1.5 TeV – also winos at LHC – but not squarks - 40-47 • Dark matter – in progress – surprising – 48 • (Little hierarchy problem – 49-51) • Final remarks 1-5 2 String/M theory a powerful, very promising framework for constructing an underlying theory that incorporates the Standard Models of particle physics and cosmology and probably addresses all the questions we hope to understand about the physical universe – we hope for such a theory! – probably also a quantum theory of gravity Compactified M-theory generically has gravity; Yang- Mills forces like the SM; chiral fermions like quarks and leptons; softly broken supersymmetry; solutions to hierarchy problems; EWSB and Higgs physics; unification; small EDMs; no flavor changing problems; partially observable superpartner spectrum; hidden sector DM; etc Simultaneously – generically Argue compactified M-theory is by far the best motivated, and most comprehensive, extension of the SM – gets physics relevant to the LHC and Higgs and superpartners right – no ad hoc inputs or free parameters Take it very seriously 4 So have to spend some time explaining derivations, testability of string/M theory Don’t have to be somewhere to test theory there – E.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Report of the Supersymmetry Theory Subgroup
    Report of the Supersymmetry Theory Subgroup J. Amundson (Wisconsin), G. Anderson (FNAL), H. Baer (FSU), J. Bagger (Johns Hopkins), R.M. Barnett (LBNL), C.H. Chen (UC Davis), G. Cleaver (OSU), B. Dobrescu (BU), M. Drees (Wisconsin), J.F. Gunion (UC Davis), G.L. Kane (Michigan), B. Kayser (NSF), C. Kolda (IAS), J. Lykken (FNAL), S.P. Martin (Michigan), T. Moroi (LBNL), S. Mrenna (Argonne), M. Nojiri (KEK), D. Pierce (SLAC), X. Tata (Hawaii), S. Thomas (SLAC), J.D. Wells (SLAC), B. Wright (North Carolina), Y. Yamada (Wisconsin) ABSTRACT Spacetime supersymmetry appears to be a fundamental in- gredient of superstring theory. We provide a mini-guide to some of the possible manifesta- tions of weak-scale supersymmetry. For each of six scenarios These motivations say nothing about the scale at which nature we provide might be supersymmetric. Indeed, there are additional motiva- tions for weak-scale supersymmetry. a brief description of the theoretical underpinnings, Incorporation of supersymmetry into the SM leads to a so- the adjustable parameters, lution of the gauge hierarchy problem. Namely, quadratic divergences in loop corrections to the Higgs boson mass a qualitative description of the associated phenomenology at future colliders, will cancel between fermionic and bosonic loops. This mechanism works only if the superpartner particle masses comments on how to simulate each scenario with existing are roughly of order or less than the weak scale. event generators. There exists an experimental hint: the three gauge cou- plings can unify at the Grand Uni®cation scale if there ex- I. INTRODUCTION ist weak-scale supersymmetric particles, with a desert be- The Standard Model (SM) is a theory of spin- 1 matter tween the weak scale and the GUT scale.
    [Show full text]
  • Kaluza-Klein Gravity, Concentrating on the General Rel- Ativity, Rather Than Particle Physics Side of the Subject
    Kaluza-Klein Gravity J. M. Overduin Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Victoria, P.O. Box 3055, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada, V8W 3P6 and P. S. Wesson Department of Physics, University of Waterloo, Ontario, Canada N2L 3G1 and Gravity Probe-B, Hansen Physics Laboratories, Stanford University, Stanford, California, U.S.A. 94305 Abstract We review higher-dimensional unified theories from the general relativity, rather than the particle physics side. Three distinct approaches to the subject are identi- fied and contrasted: compactified, projective and noncompactified. We discuss the cosmological and astrophysical implications of extra dimensions, and conclude that none of the three approaches can be ruled out on observational grounds at the present time. arXiv:gr-qc/9805018v1 7 May 1998 Preprint submitted to Elsevier Preprint 3 February 2008 1 Introduction Kaluza’s [1] achievement was to show that five-dimensional general relativity contains both Einstein’s four-dimensional theory of gravity and Maxwell’s the- ory of electromagnetism. He however imposed a somewhat artificial restriction (the cylinder condition) on the coordinates, essentially barring the fifth one a priori from making a direct appearance in the laws of physics. Klein’s [2] con- tribution was to make this restriction less artificial by suggesting a plausible physical basis for it in compactification of the fifth dimension. This idea was enthusiastically received by unified-field theorists, and when the time came to include the strong and weak forces by extending Kaluza’s mechanism to higher dimensions, it was assumed that these too would be compact. This line of thinking has led through eleven-dimensional supergravity theories in the 1980s to the current favorite contenders for a possible “theory of everything,” ten-dimensional superstrings.
    [Show full text]
  • Off-Shell Interactions for Closed-String Tachyons
    Preprint typeset in JHEP style - PAPER VERSION hep-th/0403238 KIAS-P04017 SLAC-PUB-10384 SU-ITP-04-11 TIFR-04-04 Off-Shell Interactions for Closed-String Tachyons Atish Dabholkarb,c,d, Ashik Iqubald and Joris Raeymaekersa aSchool of Physics, Korea Institute for Advanced Study, 207-43, Cheongryangri-Dong, Dongdaemun-Gu, Seoul 130-722, Korea bStanford Linear Accelerator Center, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94025, USA cInstitute for Theoretical Physics, Department of Physics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA dDepartment of Theoretical Physics, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Homi Bhabha Road, Mumbai 400005, India E-mail:[email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Abstract: Off-shell interactions for localized closed-string tachyons in C/ZN super- string backgrounds are analyzed and a conjecture for the effective height of the tachyon potential is elaborated. At large N, some of the relevant tachyons are nearly massless and their interactions can be deduced from the S-matrix. The cubic interactions be- tween these tachyons and the massless fields are computed in a closed form using orbifold CFT techniques. The cubic interaction between nearly-massless tachyons with different charges is shown to vanish and thus condensation of one tachyon does not source the others. It is shown that to leading order in N, the quartic contact in- teraction vanishes and the massless exchanges completely account for the four point scattering amplitude. This indicates that it is necessary to go beyond quartic inter- actions or to include other fields to test the conjecture for the height of the tachyon potential. Keywords: closed-string tachyons, orbifolds.
    [Show full text]
  • An Introduction to Supersymmetry
    An Introduction to Supersymmetry Ulrich Theis Institute for Theoretical Physics, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, Max-Wien-Platz 1, D–07743 Jena, Germany [email protected] This is a write-up of a series of five introductory lectures on global supersymmetry in four dimensions given at the 13th “Saalburg” Summer School 2007 in Wolfersdorf, Germany. Contents 1 Why supersymmetry? 1 2 Weyl spinors in D=4 4 3 The supersymmetry algebra 6 4 Supersymmetry multiplets 6 5 Superspace and superfields 9 6 Superspace integration 11 7 Chiral superfields 13 8 Supersymmetric gauge theories 17 9 Supersymmetry breaking 22 10 Perturbative non-renormalization theorems 26 A Sigma matrices 29 1 Why supersymmetry? When the Large Hadron Collider at CERN takes up operations soon, its main objective, besides confirming the existence of the Higgs boson, will be to discover new physics beyond the standard model of the strong and electroweak interactions. It is widely believed that what will be found is a (at energies accessible to the LHC softly broken) supersymmetric extension of the standard model. What makes supersymmetry such an attractive feature that the majority of the theoretical physics community is convinced of its existence? 1 First of all, under plausible assumptions on the properties of relativistic quantum field theories, supersymmetry is the unique extension of the algebra of Poincar´eand internal symmtries of the S-matrix. If new physics is based on such an extension, it must be supersymmetric. Furthermore, the quantum properties of supersymmetric theories are much better under control than in non-supersymmetric ones, thanks to powerful non- renormalization theorems.
    [Show full text]
  • Tachyon-Dilaton Inflation As an Α'-Non Perturbative Solution in First
    Anna Kostouki Work in progress with J. Alexandre and N. Mavromatos TachyonTachyon --DilatonDilaton InflationInflation asas anan αα''--nonnon perturbativeperturbative solutionsolution inin firstfirst quantizedquantized StringString CosmologyCosmology Oxford, 23 September 2008 A. Kostouki 2 nd UniverseNet School, Oxford, 23/09/08 1 OutlineOutline • Motivation : String Inflation in 4 dimensions • Closed Bosonic String in Graviton, Dilaton and Tachyon Backgrounds; a non – perturbative configuration • Conformal Invariance of this model • Cosmological Implications of this model: FRW universe & inflation (under conditions) • Open Issues: Exit from the inflationary phase; reheating A. Kostouki 2 nd UniverseNet School, Oxford, 23/09/08 2 MotivationMotivation Inflation : • elegant & simple idea • explains many cosmological observations (e.g. “horizon problem”, large - scale structure) Inflation in String Theory: • effective theory • in traditional string theories: compactification of extra dimensions of space-time is needed • other models exist too, but no longer “simple & elegant” A. Kostouki 2 nd UniverseNet School, Oxford, 23/09/08 3 ProposalProposal • Closed Bosonic String • graviton, dilaton and tachyon background • field configuration non-perturbative in Does it satisfy conformal invariance conditions? A. Kostouki 2 nd UniverseNet School, Oxford, 23/09/08 4 ConformalConformal propertiesproperties ofof thethe configurationconfiguration General field redefinition: • Theory is invariant • The Weyl anomaly coefficients transform : ( ) A. Kostouki 2 nd UniverseNet School, Oxford, 23/09/08 5 ConformalConformal propertiesproperties ofof thethe configurationconfiguration • 1-loop beta-functions: homogeneous dependence on X0, besides one term in the tachyon beta-function • Power counting → Every other term that appears at higher loops in the beta-functions is homogeneous A. Kostouki 2 nd UniverseNet School, Oxford, 23/09/08 6 ConformalConformal propertiesproperties ofof thethe configurationconfiguration One can find a general field redefinition , that: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • S-Duality of D-Brane Action at Order $ O (\Alpha'^ 2) $
    S-duality of D-brane action 2 at order O(α′ ) Mohammad R. Garousi1 Department of Physics, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad P.O. Box 1436, Mashhad, Iran Abstract Using the compatibility of the DBI and the Chern-Simons actions with the T- duality transformations, the curvature corrections to these actions have been recently extended to include the quadratic B-field couplings at order O(α′2). In this paper, we use the compatibility of the couplings on D3-brane with the S-duality to find the nonlinear RR couplings at order O(α′2). We confirm the quadratic RR couplings in the DBI part with the disk-level scattering amplitude. Using the regularized non- holomorphic Eisenstein series E1, we then write the results in SL(2,Z) invariant form. arXiv:1103.3121v5 [hep-th] 25 Dec 2013 [email protected] 1 Introduction The low energy effective field theory of D-branes consists of the Dirac-Born-Infeld (DBI) [1] and the Chern-Simons (CS) actions [2]. The curvature corrections to the CS part can be found by requiring that the chiral anomaly on the world volume of intersecting D-branes (I-brane) cancels with the anomalous variation of the CS action. This action for a single ′2 Dp-brane at order O(α ) is given by [3, 4, 5], 2 ′2 π α Tp (p−3) SCS C tr(RT RT ) tr(RN RN ) (1) p+1 ⊃ − 24 ZM ∧ ∧ − ∧ p+1 where M represents the world volume of the Dp-brane. For totally-geodesic embeddings of world-volume in the ambient spacetime, RT,N are the pulled back curvature 2-forms of the tangent and normal bundles respectively (see the appendix in ref.
    [Show full text]
  • Supersymmetric Nonlinear Sigma Models
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by CERN Document Server OU-HET 348 TIT/HET-448 hep-th/0006025 June 2000 Supersymmetric Nonlinear Sigma Models a b Kiyoshi Higashijima ∗ and Muneto Nitta † aDepartment of Physics, Graduate School of Science, Osaka University, Toyonaka, Osaka 560-0043, Japan bDepartment of Physics, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Oh-okayama, Meguro, Tokyo 152-8551, Japan Abstract Supersymmetric nonlinear sigma models are formulated as gauge theo- ries. Auxiliary chiral superfields are introduced to impose supersymmetric constraints of F-type. Target manifolds defined by F-type constraints are al- ways non-compact. In order to obtain nonlinear sigma models on compact manifolds, we have to introduce gauge symmetry to eliminate the degrees of freedom in non-compact directions. All supersymmetric nonlinear sigma models defined on the hermitian symmetric spaces are successfully formulated as gauge theories. 1Talk given at the International Symposium on \Quantum Chromodynamics and Color Con- finement" (Confinement 2000) , 7-10 March 2000, RCNP, Osaka, Japan. ∗e-mail: [email protected]. †e-mail: [email protected] 1 Introduction Two dimensional (2D) nonlinear sigma models and four dimensional non-abelian gauge theories have several similarities. Both of them enjoy the property of the asymptotic freedom. They are both massless in the perturbation theory, whereas they acquire the mass gap or the string tension in the non-perturbative treatment. Although it is difficult to solve QCD in analytical way, 2D nonlinear sigma models can be solved by the large N expansion and helps us to understand various non- perturbative phenomena in four dimensional gauge theories.
    [Show full text]
  • TASI 2008 Lectures: Introduction to Supersymmetry And
    TASI 2008 Lectures: Introduction to Supersymmetry and Supersymmetry Breaking Yuri Shirman Department of Physics and Astronomy University of California, Irvine, CA 92697. [email protected] Abstract These lectures, presented at TASI 08 school, provide an introduction to supersymmetry and supersymmetry breaking. We present basic formalism of supersymmetry, super- symmetric non-renormalization theorems, and summarize non-perturbative dynamics of supersymmetric QCD. We then turn to discussion of tree level, non-perturbative, and metastable supersymmetry breaking. We introduce Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model and discuss soft parameters in the Lagrangian. Finally we discuss several mech- anisms for communicating the supersymmetry breaking between the hidden and visible sectors. arXiv:0907.0039v1 [hep-ph] 1 Jul 2009 Contents 1 Introduction 2 1.1 Motivation..................................... 2 1.2 Weylfermions................................... 4 1.3 Afirstlookatsupersymmetry . .. 5 2 Constructing supersymmetric Lagrangians 6 2.1 Wess-ZuminoModel ............................... 6 2.2 Superfieldformalism .............................. 8 2.3 VectorSuperfield ................................. 12 2.4 Supersymmetric U(1)gaugetheory ....................... 13 2.5 Non-abeliangaugetheory . .. 15 3 Non-renormalization theorems 16 3.1 R-symmetry.................................... 17 3.2 Superpotentialterms . .. .. .. 17 3.3 Gaugecouplingrenormalization . ..... 19 3.4 D-termrenormalization. ... 20 4 Non-perturbative dynamics in SUSY QCD 20 4.1 Affleck-Dine-Seiberg
    [Show full text]
  • 8. Compactification and T-Duality
    8. Compactification and T-Duality In this section, we will consider the simplest compactification of the bosonic string: a background spacetime of the form R1,24 S1 (8.1) ⇥ The circle is taken to have radius R, so that the coordinate on S1 has periodicity X25 X25 +2⇡R ⌘ We will initially be interested in the physics at length scales R where motion on the S1 can be ignored. Our goal is to understand what physics looks like to an observer living in the non-compact R1,24 Minkowski space. This general idea goes by the name of Kaluza-Klein compactification. We will view this compactification in two ways: firstly from the perspective of the spacetime low-energy e↵ective action and secondly from the perspective of the string worldsheet. 8.1 The View from Spacetime Let’s start with the low-energy e↵ective action. Looking at length scales R means that we will take all fields to be independent of X25: they are instead functions only on the non-compact R1,24. Consider the metric in Einstein frame. This decomposes into three di↵erent fields 1,24 on R :ametricG˜µ⌫,avectorAµ and a scalar σ which we package into the D =26 dimensional metric as 2 µ ⌫ 2σ 25 µ 2 ds = G˜µ⌫ dX dX + e dX + Aµ dX (8.2) Here all the indices run over the non-compact directions µ, ⌫ =0 ,...24 only. The vector field Aµ is an honest gauge field, with the gauge symmetry descend- ing from di↵eomorphisms in D =26dimensions.Toseethisrecallthatunderthe transformation δXµ = V µ(X), the metric transforms as δG = ⇤ + ⇤ µ⌫ rµ ⌫ r⌫ µ This means that di↵eomorphisms of the compact direction, δX25 =⇤(Xµ), turn into gauge transformations of Aµ, δAµ = @µ⇤ –197– We’d like to know how the fields Gµ⌫, Aµ and σ interact.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Supersymmetry
    Introduction to Supersymmetry Pre-SUSY Summer School Corpus Christi, Texas May 15-18, 2019 Stephen P. Martin Northern Illinois University [email protected] 1 Topics: Why: Motivation for supersymmetry (SUSY) • What: SUSY Lagrangians, SUSY breaking and the Minimal • Supersymmetric Standard Model, superpartner decays Who: Sorry, not covered. • For some more details and a slightly better attempt at proper referencing: A supersymmetry primer, hep-ph/9709356, version 7, January 2016 • TASI 2011 lectures notes: two-component fermion notation and • supersymmetry, arXiv:1205.4076. If you find corrections, please do let me know! 2 Lecture 1: Motivation and Introduction to Supersymmetry Motivation: The Hierarchy Problem • Supermultiplets • Particle content of the Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model • (MSSM) Need for “soft” breaking of supersymmetry • The Wess-Zumino Model • 3 People have cited many reasons why extensions of the Standard Model might involve supersymmetry (SUSY). Some of them are: A possible cold dark matter particle • A light Higgs boson, M = 125 GeV • h Unification of gauge couplings • Mathematical elegance, beauty • ⋆ “What does that even mean? No such thing!” – Some modern pundits ⋆ “We beg to differ.” – Einstein, Dirac, . However, for me, the single compelling reason is: The Hierarchy Problem • 4 An analogy: Coulomb self-energy correction to the electron’s mass A point-like electron would have an infinite classical electrostatic energy. Instead, suppose the electron is a solid sphere of uniform charge density and radius R. An undergraduate problem gives: 3e2 ∆ECoulomb = 20πǫ0R 2 Interpreting this as a correction ∆me = ∆ECoulomb/c to the electron mass: 15 0.86 10− meters m = m + (1 MeV/c2) × .
    [Show full text]
  • Dilaton and Off-Shell (Non-Critical String) Effects in Boltzmann Equation for Species Abundances AB Lahanas1, NE Mavromatos2 and DV Nanopoulos3,4,5
    Research article Open Access Dilaton and off-shell (non-critical string) effects in Boltzmann equation for species abundances AB Lahanas1, NE Mavromatos2 and DV Nanopoulos3,4,5 Address: 1University of Athens, Physics Department, Nuclear and Particle Physics Section, GR157 71, Athens, Greece., 2King's College London, University of London, Department of Physics, Strand WC2R 2LS, London, UK., 3George P. and Cynthia W. Mitchell Institute for Fundamental Physics, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA., 4Astroparticle Physics Group, Houston Advanced Research Center (HARC), Mitchell Campus, Woodlands, TX 77381, USA. and 5Academy of Athens, Division of Natural Sciences, 28 Panepistimiou Avenue, Athens 10679, Greece. Email: AB Lahanas - [email protected]; NE Mavromatos - [email protected]; DV Nanopoulos - [email protected] Published: 2 October 2007 Received: 3 June 2007 Accepted: 2 October 2007 PMC Physics A 2007, 1:2 doi:10.1186/1754-0410-1-2 This article is available from: http://www.physmathcentral.com/1754-0410/1/2 © 2007 Lahanas et al. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Abstract In this work we derive the modifications to the Boltzmann equation governing the cosmic evolution of relic abundances induced by dilaton dissipative-source and non-critical-string terms in dilaton-driven non-equilibrium string Cosmologies. We also discuss briefly the most important phenomenological consequences, including modifications of the constraints on the available parameter space of cosmologically appealing particle physics models, imposed by recent precision data of astrophysical measurements.
    [Show full text]