DOCSLIB.ORG

5D Kaluza-Klein Theories - a Brief Review

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
5D Kaluza-Klein Theories - a Brief Review 5D Kaluza-Klein theories - a brief review Andr´eMorgado Patr´ıcio, no 67898 Departamento de F´ısica, Instituto Superior T´ecnico, Av. Rovisco Pais 1, 1049-001 Lisboa, Portugal (Dated: 21 de Novembro de 2013) We review Kaluza-Klein theory in five dimensions from the General Relativity side. Kaluza's original idea is examined and two distinct approaches to the subject are presented and contrasted: compactified and noncompactified theories. We also discuss some cosmological implications of the noncompactified theory at the end of this paper. ^ ^ 1 ^ I. INTRODUCTION where GAB ≡ RAB − 2 g^ABR is the Einstein tensor. Inspired by the ties between Minkowki's 4D space- For the metric, we identify the αβ-part ofg ^AB with time and Maxwell's EM unification, Nordstr¨om[3] in 1914 gαβ, the α4-part as the electromagnetic potential Aα and and Kaluza[4] in 1921 showed that 5D general relativ- g^44 with a scalar field φ, parametrizing it as follows: ity contains both Einstein's 4D gravity and Maxwell's g + κ2φ2A A κφ2A EM. However, they imposed an artificial restriction of no g^ (x; y) = αβ α β α ; (4) AB κφ2A φ2 dependence on the fifth coordinate (cylinder condition). β Klein[5], in 1926, suggested a physical basis to avoid this where κ is a multiplicative factor. If we identifyp it in problem in the compactification of the fifth dimension, terms of the 4D gravitational constant by κ = 4 πG, idea now used in higher-dimensional generalisations to then, using the metric4 and applying the cylinder con- include weak and strong interactions. dition, the action3 contains three components: The models to be discussed have three key features: Z p R φ2F F αβ 2@αφ∂ φ (i) matter in 4D is a manifestation of pure geometry S = − d4x −gφ + αβ + α ; (5) in 5D, i.e., no energy-momentum tensor is needed; 16πG 4 3κ2φ2 (ii) the higher-dimensional theory is a minimal exten- where the 4D gravitational constant G is defined in terms sion of general relativity, i.e., there is no modifica- of its 5D counterpart G^ by G = G=^ R dy. tion to the mathematical structure of the theory; From this action, the field equations3 reduce to the (iii) Physics only depends on the first four coordinates following field equations in terms of 4D quantities[1]: (cylinder condition). κ2φ2 1 G = T EM − [r (@ φ) − g φ] ; (6) There are three approaches to study higher- αβ 2 αβ φ α β αβ dimensional theories, each one sacrifices one of the key α α @ φ features: compactified, projective and noncompactified r Fαβ = −3 Fαβ; (7) theories. Here we will review the general relativity as- φ κ2φ3 pects of the compactified and noncompactified ones. φ = F F αβ; (8) 4 αβ A. Remarks on notation and conventions where T EM is the EM energy-momentum tensor Throughout this report, capital Latin indices A, B, ... αβ run over 0,1,2,3,4 and Greek indices α; β, ... over 0,1,2,3. γδ EM gαβFγδF γ Five dimensional quantities are denoted by hats and the Tαβ ≡ − Fα Fβγ ;Fαβ ≡ @αAβ − @βAα: (9) new fifth coordinate will be denoted by y = x4. 4 The four-dimensional metric signature is taken to be This ability is the central \miracle" of Kaluza-Klein (+ − −−) and we work in a system of units with c = 1. theory: 4D matter (EM radiation) has arised purely from We also set ~ = G = 1 in the cosmology section. the geometry of empty 5D space. Two important cases are worth of mention: φ = constant and Aα = 0. II. 5D KALUZA MECHANISM For φ = constant, the field equations are just Einstein From feature (ii) of Kaluza's approach, the Ricci tensor and Maxwell equations: ^ ^ ^C RAB, Ricci scalar R and Christoffel symbols ΓAB are 2 EM α Gαβ = 8πGφ Tαβ ; r Fαβ = 0 : (10) R^ = @ Γ^C − @ Γ^C + Γ^C Γ^D − Γ^C Γ^D ; AB C AB B AC AB CD AD BC This result was obtained by Kaluza and Klein, who ^ AB ^ R =g ^ RAB; (1) set φ = 1. However, it isn't consistent with eq.8 if αβ ^C 1 CD FαβF 6= 0, fact first noted by Jordan[8] and Thiry[9]. ΓAB = g^ (@Ag^DB + @Bg^DA − @Dg^AB) ; 2 The restriction Aα = 0 is a physical one. In fact, with the cylinder condition we are working in a special coor- whereg ^ is the five-dimensional metric tensor. AB dinate system, so that we can't set A = 0 by a special The action and field equations are a five-dimensional α choice of coordinates because this theory is no longer in- version of the usual 4D Einstein action and equations variant to general coordinate transformations. Then, the −1 Z metric4 becomes block diagonal and we get that the ac- S = R^p−gd^ 4xdy; (2) 16πG^ tion is the special case ! = 0 of a Brans-Dicke action[10]: ^ ^ δS = 0 ! GAB = 0 , RAB = 0; (3) Z Rφ @αφ∂ φ S = − d4x + ! α : (11) 16πG φ Another interesting point to analyze is the possibility In fact, from eq. 20, we have of rescaling the metric and put the gravitational part of p m = jnj=(rpφ); (23) the action5 in canonical form: −gR=16πG. This can n 2 −1 19 be done by making the redefinition φ ! φ and then which gives for the electron mass m1 ∼ lpl ∼ 10 GeV, carrying out the conformal rescaling of the metric much less than the experimental value me ≈ 0:5 MeV. This problem can be avoided by doing three things[1]: g^ ! g^0 = Ω2g^ ; Ω2 = φ−1=3; (12) AB AB AB (1) identify observed light particles with n = 0 modes; (2) which leads to the rescaled canonical action[2] invoke the mechanism of spontaneous symmetry break- ! ing to give them masses; (3) go to higher dimensions to Z R0 φF 0 F 0αβ @0αφ∂0 φ S0 = − d4xp−g0 + αβ + α : (13) solve the problem of n = 0 modes with nonzero charges, 16πG 4 6κ2φ2 because the particles are no longer singlets of the gauge group corresponding to the ground state. The Brans-Dicke case isp obtained if Aα = 0. In terms of the "dilaton" σ ≡ lnφ/( 3κ), the action is then that IV. NONCOMPACTIFIED THEORIES for a minimally coupled scalar field with no potential: In this aproach, we don't restrict the topology and Z R0 @0ασ@0 σ S0 = − d4xp−g0 + α : (14) scale of the fifth dimension in an attempt to satisfy ex- 16πG 2 actly the cylinder condition. Instead, we stay with the III. COMPACTIFIED THEORIES idea that the new coordinates are physical. The theory is then invariant to general 5D coordinate To avoid the cylinder condition, Klein assumed that transformations and we can choose coordinates such that the extra spatial dimension compactifies to the topology Aα = 0. The 5D metric tensor4 is then block diagonal 1 of a circle S of very small radius r. We are then left g 0 g^ (x; y) = αβ ; (24) with a residual 4D coordinate invariance and an abelian AB 0 εφ2 gauge invariance associated with transformations of the coordinate of S1. Thus, space has topology R4 × S1. where " is a factor which allows a timelike as well as 2 To see this, consider the transformation spacelike signature for the fifth dimension (" = 1). The procedure to obtain the field equations is exactly y ! y0 = y + f(x); (15) the same as in Kaluza's Mechanism, except that now we @xC @xD keep derivatives with respect to the fifth coordinate. Re- g^ ! g^0 = g^ : (16) AB AB @x0A @x0B CD quiring the usual Einstein 4D equations hold, Then, for the particular transformation 15, 1 8πGTαβ = Rαβ − Rgαβ; (25) 0 2 Aα ! A = Aα + @αf(x): (17) α this procedure produces the 4D field equations 26 to 28: Thus we see that the transformation 15 induces an abelian gauge transformation on A . r (@αφ) " @4φ @4g α 8πG T = β − αβ − @ (@ g ) αβ 2 4 4 αβ To see how Aα couples to matter, we introduce in the φ 2φ φ ^ " γδ # theory the simplest 5D matter, a scalar field (x; y): " γδ g @4gγδ @4gαβ − g @4gαγ @4g − Z 2φ2 βδ 2 4 p A ^ ^ S ^ = − d xdy −g@^ @A : (18) " h gαβ γδ γδ 2i − @4g @4g + (g @4g ) ; (26) 2φ2 4 γδ γδ Because of the S1 topology of the fifth dimension, β β 1 βγ β γ ^ ^ ^ rβ Pα = 0 ;Pα ≡ p g @4gγα − δα g @4gγ ; (27) (x; y + 2πr) = (x; y), from which we can expand : 2 g^44 αβ αβ 2 αβ n=+1 @4g @4g g @ g @4φ g @4g X εφ2φ = − αβ − 4 αβ + αβ : (28) ^(x; y) = ^(n)einy=r: (19) 4 2 2φ n=−∞ The first equations allow us to interpret 4D matter Putting this expansion into the action 18, one finds described by Tαβ as a manifestation of pure geometry in the 5D world, which has been termed the "induced- Z 2 ^(n) 2 # X 4 p h α (n) (n) n S = − dyd x −g D ^ D ^ − ; (20) matter interpretation"of Kaluza-Klein theory. ^ α φ r2 n The interpretation of eqs. 27-28 is not so straightfor- α inκAα ward. We could conjecture that these equations describe where Dα ≡ @ + r is an EM covariant derivative. Comparing this with the usual minimal coupling of the microscopic properties of matter[1]. In particular, if gauge field Aα, we find that the nth Fourier mode of the Pαβ = k(mivαvβ + mggαβ) ; (29) scalar field ^ carries a quantized charge p where k is a constant, mi and mg are definitions for −1=2 p qn = nκφ =r = n 16πG=(r φ) ; (21) the inertial and gravitational mass of a particle in the p induced-matter fluid, and vα ≡ dxα=ds is its 4-velocity, where we have divided Aα by φ to get the correct EM contribution in 13.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Kaluza-Klein Gravity, Concentrating on the General Rel- Ativity, Rather Than Particle Physics Side of the Subject
    Kaluza-Klein Gravity J. M. Overduin Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Victoria, P.O. Box 3055, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada, V8W 3P6 and P. S. Wesson Department of Physics, University of Waterloo, Ontario, Canada N2L 3G1 and Gravity Probe-B, Hansen Physics Laboratories, Stanford University, Stanford, California, U.S.A. 94305 Abstract We review higher-dimensional unified theories from the general relativity, rather than the particle physics side. Three distinct approaches to the subject are identi- fied and contrasted: compactified, projective and noncompactified. We discuss the cosmological and astrophysical implications of extra dimensions, and conclude that none of the three approaches can be ruled out on observational grounds at the present time. arXiv:gr-qc/9805018v1 7 May 1998 Preprint submitted to Elsevier Preprint 3 February 2008 1 Introduction Kaluza’s [1] achievement was to show that five-dimensional general relativity contains both Einstein’s four-dimensional theory of gravity and Maxwell’s the- ory of electromagnetism. He however imposed a somewhat artificial restriction (the cylinder condition) on the coordinates, essentially barring the fifth one a priori from making a direct appearance in the laws of physics. Klein’s [2] con- tribution was to make this restriction less artificial by suggesting a plausible physical basis for it in compactification of the fifth dimension. This idea was enthusiastically received by unified-field theorists, and when the time came to include the strong and weak forces by extending Kaluza’s mechanism to higher dimensions, it was assumed that these too would be compact. This line of thinking has led through eleven-dimensional supergravity theories in the 1980s to the current favorite contenders for a possible “theory of everything,” ten-dimensional superstrings.
    [Show full text]
  • Off-Shell Interactions for Closed-String Tachyons
    Preprint typeset in JHEP style - PAPER VERSION hep-th/0403238 KIAS-P04017 SLAC-PUB-10384 SU-ITP-04-11 TIFR-04-04 Off-Shell Interactions for Closed-String Tachyons Atish Dabholkarb,c,d, Ashik Iqubald and Joris Raeymaekersa aSchool of Physics, Korea Institute for Advanced Study, 207-43, Cheongryangri-Dong, Dongdaemun-Gu, Seoul 130-722, Korea bStanford Linear Accelerator Center, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94025, USA cInstitute for Theoretical Physics, Department of Physics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA dDepartment of Theoretical Physics, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Homi Bhabha Road, Mumbai 400005, India E-mail:[email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Abstract: Off-shell interactions for localized closed-string tachyons in C/ZN super- string backgrounds are analyzed and a conjecture for the effective height of the tachyon potential is elaborated. At large N, some of the relevant tachyons are nearly massless and their interactions can be deduced from the S-matrix. The cubic interactions be- tween these tachyons and the massless fields are computed in a closed form using orbifold CFT techniques. The cubic interaction between nearly-massless tachyons with different charges is shown to vanish and thus condensation of one tachyon does not source the others. It is shown that to leading order in N, the quartic contact in- teraction vanishes and the massless exchanges completely account for the four point scattering amplitude. This indicates that it is necessary to go beyond quartic inter- actions or to include other fields to test the conjecture for the height of the tachyon potential. Keywords: closed-string tachyons, orbifolds.
    [Show full text]
  • Unification of Gravity and Quantum Theory Adam Daniels Old Dominion University, [email protected]
    Old Dominion University ODU Digital Commons Faculty-Sponsored Student Research Electrical & Computer Engineering 2017 Unification of Gravity and Quantum Theory Adam Daniels Old Dominion University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/engineering_students Part of the Elementary Particles and Fields and String Theory Commons, Engineering Physics Commons, and the Quantum Physics Commons Repository Citation Daniels, Adam, "Unification of Gravity and Quantum Theory" (2017). Faculty-Sponsored Student Research. 1. https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/engineering_students/1 This Report is brought to you for free and open access by the Electrical & Computer Engineering at ODU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty-Sponsored Student Research by an authorized administrator of ODU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Unification of Gravity and Quantum Theory Adam D. Daniels [email protected] Electrical and Computer Engineering Department, Old Dominion University Norfolk, Virginia, United States Abstract- An overview of the four fundamental forces of objects falling on earth. Newton’s insight was that the force that physics as described by the Standard Model (SM) and prevalent governs matter here on Earth was the same force governing the unifying theories beyond it is provided. Background knowledge matter in space. Another critical step forward in unification was of the particles governing the fundamental forces is provided, accomplished in the 1860s when James C. Maxwell wrote down as it will be useful in understanding the way in which the his famous Maxwell’s Equations, showing that electricity and unification efforts of particle physics has evolved, either from magnetism were just two facets of a more fundamental the SM, or apart from it.
    [Show full text]
  • Post-Newtonian Approximation
    Post-Newtonian gravity and gravitational-wave astronomy Polarization waveforms in the SSB reference frame Relativistic binary systems Effective one-body formalism Post-Newtonian Approximation Piotr Jaranowski Faculty of Physcis, University of Bia lystok,Poland 01.07.2013 P. Jaranowski School of Gravitational Waves, 01{05.07.2013, Warsaw Post-Newtonian gravity and gravitational-wave astronomy Polarization waveforms in the SSB reference frame Relativistic binary systems Effective one-body formalism 1 Post-Newtonian gravity and gravitational-wave astronomy 2 Polarization waveforms in the SSB reference frame 3 Relativistic binary systems Leading-order waveforms (Newtonian binary dynamics) Leading-order waveforms without radiation-reaction effects Leading-order waveforms with radiation-reaction effects Post-Newtonian corrections Post-Newtonian spin-dependent effects 4 Effective one-body formalism EOB-improved 3PN-accurate Hamiltonian Usage of Pad´eapproximants EOB flexibility parameters P. Jaranowski School of Gravitational Waves, 01{05.07.2013, Warsaw Post-Newtonian gravity and gravitational-wave astronomy Polarization waveforms in the SSB reference frame Relativistic binary systems Effective one-body formalism 1 Post-Newtonian gravity and gravitational-wave astronomy 2 Polarization waveforms in the SSB reference frame 3 Relativistic binary systems Leading-order waveforms (Newtonian binary dynamics) Leading-order waveforms without radiation-reaction effects Leading-order waveforms with radiation-reaction effects Post-Newtonian corrections Post-Newtonian spin-dependent effects 4 Effective one-body formalism EOB-improved 3PN-accurate Hamiltonian Usage of Pad´eapproximants EOB flexibility parameters P. Jaranowski School of Gravitational Waves, 01{05.07.2013, Warsaw Relativistic binary systems exist in nature, they comprise compact objects: neutron stars or black holes. These systems emit gravitational waves, which experimenters try to detect within the LIGO/VIRGO/GEO600 projects.
    [Show full text]
  • Tachyon-Dilaton Inflation As an Α'-Non Perturbative Solution in First
    Anna Kostouki Work in progress with J. Alexandre and N. Mavromatos TachyonTachyon --DilatonDilaton InflationInflation asas anan αα''--nonnon perturbativeperturbative solutionsolution inin firstfirst quantizedquantized StringString CosmologyCosmology Oxford, 23 September 2008 A. Kostouki 2 nd UniverseNet School, Oxford, 23/09/08 1 OutlineOutline • Motivation : String Inflation in 4 dimensions • Closed Bosonic String in Graviton, Dilaton and Tachyon Backgrounds; a non – perturbative configuration • Conformal Invariance of this model • Cosmological Implications of this model: FRW universe & inflation (under conditions) • Open Issues: Exit from the inflationary phase; reheating A. Kostouki 2 nd UniverseNet School, Oxford, 23/09/08 2 MotivationMotivation Inflation : • elegant & simple idea • explains many cosmological observations (e.g. “horizon problem”, large - scale structure) Inflation in String Theory: • effective theory • in traditional string theories: compactification of extra dimensions of space-time is needed • other models exist too, but no longer “simple & elegant” A. Kostouki 2 nd UniverseNet School, Oxford, 23/09/08 3 ProposalProposal • Closed Bosonic String • graviton, dilaton and tachyon background • field configuration non-perturbative in Does it satisfy conformal invariance conditions? A. Kostouki 2 nd UniverseNet School, Oxford, 23/09/08 4 ConformalConformal propertiesproperties ofof thethe configurationconfiguration General field redefinition: • Theory is invariant • The Weyl anomaly coefficients transform : ( ) A. Kostouki 2 nd UniverseNet School, Oxford, 23/09/08 5 ConformalConformal propertiesproperties ofof thethe configurationconfiguration • 1-loop beta-functions: homogeneous dependence on X0, besides one term in the tachyon beta-function • Power counting → Every other term that appears at higher loops in the beta-functions is homogeneous A. Kostouki 2 nd UniverseNet School, Oxford, 23/09/08 6 ConformalConformal propertiesproperties ofof thethe configurationconfiguration One can find a general field redefinition , that: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • S-Duality of D-Brane Action at Order $ O (\Alpha'^ 2) $
    S-duality of D-brane action 2 at order O(α′ ) Mohammad R. Garousi1 Department of Physics, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad P.O. Box 1436, Mashhad, Iran Abstract Using the compatibility of the DBI and the Chern-Simons actions with the T- duality transformations, the curvature corrections to these actions have been recently extended to include the quadratic B-field couplings at order O(α′2). In this paper, we use the compatibility of the couplings on D3-brane with the S-duality to find the nonlinear RR couplings at order O(α′2). We confirm the quadratic RR couplings in the DBI part with the disk-level scattering amplitude. Using the regularized non- holomorphic Eisenstein series E1, we then write the results in SL(2,Z) invariant form. arXiv:1103.3121v5 [hep-th] 25 Dec 2013 [email protected] 1 Introduction The low energy effective field theory of D-branes consists of the Dirac-Born-Infeld (DBI) [1] and the Chern-Simons (CS) actions [2]. The curvature corrections to the CS part can be found by requiring that the chiral anomaly on the world volume of intersecting D-branes (I-brane) cancels with the anomalous variation of the CS action. This action for a single ′2 Dp-brane at order O(α ) is given by [3, 4, 5], 2 ′2 π α Tp (p−3) SCS C tr(RT RT ) tr(RN RN ) (1) p+1 ⊃ − 24 ZM ∧ ∧ − ∧ p+1 where M represents the world volume of the Dp-brane. For totally-geodesic embeddings of world-volume in the ambient spacetime, RT,N are the pulled back curvature 2-forms of the tangent and normal bundles respectively (see the appendix in ref.
    [Show full text]
  • 8. Compactification and T-Duality
    8. Compactification and T-Duality In this section, we will consider the simplest compactification of the bosonic string: a background spacetime of the form R1,24 S1 (8.1) ⇥ The circle is taken to have radius R, so that the coordinate on S1 has periodicity X25 X25 +2⇡R ⌘ We will initially be interested in the physics at length scales R where motion on the S1 can be ignored. Our goal is to understand what physics looks like to an observer living in the non-compact R1,24 Minkowski space. This general idea goes by the name of Kaluza-Klein compactification. We will view this compactification in two ways: firstly from the perspective of the spacetime low-energy e↵ective action and secondly from the perspective of the string worldsheet. 8.1 The View from Spacetime Let’s start with the low-energy e↵ective action. Looking at length scales R means that we will take all fields to be independent of X25: they are instead functions only on the non-compact R1,24. Consider the metric in Einstein frame. This decomposes into three di↵erent fields 1,24 on R :ametricG˜µ⌫,avectorAµ and a scalar σ which we package into the D =26 dimensional metric as 2 µ ⌫ 2σ 25 µ 2 ds = G˜µ⌫ dX dX + e dX + Aµ dX (8.2) Here all the indices run over the non-compact directions µ, ⌫ =0 ,...24 only. The vector field Aµ is an honest gauge field, with the gauge symmetry descend- ing from di↵eomorphisms in D =26dimensions.Toseethisrecallthatunderthe transformation δXµ = V µ(X), the metric transforms as δG = ⇤ + ⇤ µ⌫ rµ ⌫ r⌫ µ This means that di↵eomorphisms of the compact direction, δX25 =⇤(Xµ), turn into gauge transformations of Aµ, δAµ = @µ⇤ –197– We’d like to know how the fields Gµ⌫, Aµ and σ interact.
    [Show full text]
  • Einstein's Gravitational Field
    Einstein’s gravitational field Abstract: There exists some confusion, as evidenced in the literature, regarding the nature the gravitational field in Einstein’s General Theory of Relativity. It is argued here that this confusion is a result of a change in interpretation of the gravitational field. Einstein identified the existence of gravity with the inertial motion of accelerating bodies (i.e. bodies in free-fall) whereas contemporary physicists identify the existence of gravity with space-time curvature (i.e. tidal forces). The interpretation of gravity as a curvature in space-time is an interpretation Einstein did not agree with. 1 Author: Peter M. Brown e-mail: [email protected] 2 INTRODUCTION Einstein’s General Theory of Relativity (EGR) has been credited as the greatest intellectual achievement of the 20th Century. This accomplishment is reflected in Time Magazine’s December 31, 1999 issue 1, which declares Einstein the Person of the Century. Indeed, Einstein is often taken as the model of genius for his work in relativity. It is widely assumed that, according to Einstein’s general theory of relativity, gravitation is a curvature in space-time. There is a well- accepted definition of space-time curvature. As stated by Thorne 2 space-time curvature and tidal gravity are the same thing expressed in different languages, the former in the language of relativity, the later in the language of Newtonian gravity. However one of the main tenants of general relativity is the Principle of Equivalence: A uniform gravitational field is equivalent to a uniformly accelerating frame of reference. This implies that one can create a uniform gravitational field simply by changing one’s frame of reference from an inertial frame of reference to an accelerating frame, which is rather difficult idea to accept.
    [Show full text]
  • Principle of Relativity and Inertial Dragging
    ThePrincipleofRelativityandInertialDragging By ØyvindG.Grøn OsloUniversityCollege,Departmentofengineering,St.OlavsPl.4,0130Oslo, Norway Email: [email protected] Mach’s principle and the principle of relativity have been discussed by H. I. HartmanandC.Nissim-Sabatinthisjournal.Severalphenomenaweresaidtoviolate the principle of relativity as applied to rotating motion. These claims have recently been contested. However, in neither of these articles have the general relativistic phenomenonofinertialdraggingbeeninvoked,andnocalculationhavebeenoffered byeithersidetosubstantiatetheirclaims.HereIdiscussthepossiblevalidityofthe principleofrelativityforrotatingmotionwithinthecontextofthegeneraltheoryof relativity, and point out the significance of inertial dragging in this connection. Although my main points are of a qualitative nature, I also provide the necessary calculationstodemonstratehowthesepointscomeoutasconsequencesofthegeneral theoryofrelativity. 1 1.Introduction H. I. Hartman and C. Nissim-Sabat 1 have argued that “one cannot ascribe all pertinentobservationssolelytorelativemotionbetweenasystemandtheuniverse”. They consider an UR-scenario in which a bucket with water is atrest in a rotating universe,andaBR-scenariowherethebucketrotatesinanon-rotatinguniverseand givefiveexamplestoshowthatthesesituationsarenotphysicallyequivalent,i.e.that theprincipleofrelativityisnotvalidforrotationalmotion. When Einstein 2 presented the general theory of relativity he emphasized the importanceofthegeneralprincipleofrelativity.Inasectiontitled“TheNeedforan
    [Show full text]
  • Dilaton and Off-Shell (Non-Critical String) Effects in Boltzmann Equation for Species Abundances AB Lahanas1, NE Mavromatos2 and DV Nanopoulos3,4,5
    Research article Open Access Dilaton and off-shell (non-critical string) effects in Boltzmann equation for species abundances AB Lahanas1, NE Mavromatos2 and DV Nanopoulos3,4,5 Address: 1University of Athens, Physics Department, Nuclear and Particle Physics Section, GR157 71, Athens, Greece., 2King's College London, University of London, Department of Physics, Strand WC2R 2LS, London, UK., 3George P. and Cynthia W. Mitchell Institute for Fundamental Physics, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA., 4Astroparticle Physics Group, Houston Advanced Research Center (HARC), Mitchell Campus, Woodlands, TX 77381, USA. and 5Academy of Athens, Division of Natural Sciences, 28 Panepistimiou Avenue, Athens 10679, Greece. Email: AB Lahanas - [email protected]; NE Mavromatos - [email protected]; DV Nanopoulos - [email protected] Published: 2 October 2007 Received: 3 June 2007 Accepted: 2 October 2007 PMC Physics A 2007, 1:2 doi:10.1186/1754-0410-1-2 This article is available from: http://www.physmathcentral.com/1754-0410/1/2 © 2007 Lahanas et al. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Abstract In this work we derive the modifications to the Boltzmann equation governing the cosmic evolution of relic abundances induced by dilaton dissipative-source and non-critical-string terms in dilaton-driven non-equilibrium string Cosmologies. We also discuss briefly the most important phenomenological consequences, including modifications of the constraints on the available parameter space of cosmologically appealing particle physics models, imposed by recent precision data of astrophysical measurements.
    [Show full text]
  • Supersymmetry and Stationary Solutions in Dilaton-Axion Gravity" (1994)
    University of Massachusetts Amherst ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst Physics Department Faculty Publication Series Physics 1994 Supersymmetry and stationary solutions in dilaton- axion gravity R Kallosh David Kastor University of Massachusetts - Amherst, [email protected] T Ortín T Torma Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/physics_faculty_pubs Part of the Physical Sciences and Mathematics Commons Recommended Citation Kallosh, R; Kastor, David; Ortín, T; and Torma, T, "Supersymmetry and stationary solutions in dilaton-axion gravity" (1994). Physics Review D. 1219. Retrieved from https://scholarworks.umass.edu/physics_faculty_pubs/1219 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Physics at ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. It has been accepted for inclusion in Physics Department Faculty Publication Series by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. For more information, please contact [email protected]. SU-ITP-94-12 UMHEP-407 QMW-PH-94-12 hep-th/9406059 SUPERSYMMETRY AND STATIONARY SOLUTIONS IN DILATON-AXION GRAVITY Renata Kallosha1, David Kastorb2, Tom´as Ort´ınc3 and Tibor Tormab4 aPhysics Department, Stanford University, Stanford CA 94305, USA bDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of Massachusetts, Amherst MA 01003 cDepartment of Physics, Queen Mary and Westfield College, Mile End Road, London E1 4NS, U.K. ABSTRACT New stationary solutions of 4-dimensional dilaton-axion gravity are presented, which correspond to the charged Taub-NUT and Israel-Wilson-Perj´es (IWP) solu- tions of Einstein-Maxwell theory. The charged axion-dilaton Taub-NUT solutions are shown to have a number of interesting properties: i) manifest SL(2, R) sym- arXiv:hep-th/9406059v1 10 Jun 1994 metry, ii) an infinite throat in an extremal limit, iii) the throat limit coincides with an exact CFT construction.
    [Show full text]
  • Soft Theorems for the Gravity Dilaton and the Nambu-Goldstone Boson Dilaton
    Soft theorems for the Gravity Dilaton and the Nambu-Goldstone Boson Dilaton Raffaele Marotta INFN Naples GGI April 2019 Talk based on: . P. Di Vecchia, R. M., M. Mojaza, JHEP 1901 (2019) 038 + work in progress. P. Di Vecchia, R. M., M. Mojaza, JHEP 1710(2017)017 . P. Di Vecchia, R.M. , M. Mojaza, J. Nohle, Phys. Rev D93 (2016) n.8, 080515. Plan of the talk • Motivations • Soft theorems in spontaneously broken conformal field theories. • Soft theorems from tree level string amplitudes • Multiloop soft theorems in bosonic string theory • Conclusions. Motivations • It is well know that scattering amplitudes in the deep infrared region (or soft limit) satisfy interesting relations. Low’s theorem: Amplitudes with a soft photon are determined from the corresponding amplitude without the soft particle 푝1 푝1 푝 Soft-photon 2 푞 → 0 푛 = ෍ 퐼=1 푝푖 푝푛 Soft-photon polarization 푒푖 charge of the particle smooth in the soft limit Weinberg: Amplitudes involving gravitons and matter particles show and universal behavior when one graviton becomes soft. They were recognized to be a consequence of the gauge invariance Soft-Photon Soft-graviton Adler’s zero (Weiberg, The Quatum Theory of Fields Vol .II.) • Goldstone theorem: When a symmetry G is spontaneously broken to a sub-group H the spectrum of the theory contains as many Goldston bosons 휋푎, parametrizing the 퐺 coset space Τ퐻 . • 푇푖, 푋푎 are the unbroken and broken generators, 푖 푎 respectively. 퐽 휇, 퐽 휇 are the corresponding currents. 푎 • The matrix elements of the broken currents 퐽휇 are: • The matrix element of a broken current between arbitrary states I, j, has two contributions: 푎 푎 퐽 휇 퐽 휇 Goldstone pole No-pole contribution to F is the “decay constant” dominance the matrix element of for 푞2 → 0 the current.
    [Show full text]