Creative Community Index

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Creative Community Index CREATIVE COMMUNITY INDEX Measuring Progress Toward A Vibrant Silicon Valley IN QUIRIES INTO CULTURE SERIES Published by C U LTURAL INITIATIVES SILICON VA L L E Y Welcome The purpose of the C r e a t i ve Community Index i s : I wish to extend my deep gratitude to the funding sources and partners who have made • To describe, based on quantitative research, the 2005 Creative Community Index possible. the cultural landscape of Silicon Valley, with The concept of including analysis on the special emphasis on the arts. cultural views and aspirations of local leaders • To illuminate correlations between Silicon originated with American Leadership Forum Valley’s cultural vitality and its capacity to Silicon Valley, which also contributed gener- generate creative ideas significant to the ously to the project. The release of the 2005 region’s economic and social well-being. Index coincides with a major conference on creativity in Silicon Valley for which the Silicon Valley has a tradition of gathering Forum was a key organizer. The James Irvine objective data on a wide range of regional Foundation provided the initial grant support, issues of public import. For many years, Joint and major funding was also provided by the Venture: Silicon Valley Network has produced John S. and James L. Knight Foundation, The an annual Index of Silicon Valley, which presents David and Lucile Packard Foundation, The extensive data and analysis on the region’s William and Flora Hewlett Foundation, and economy, environment, society and area stew- Adobe Systems Incorporated. Garnering sup- ardship. Joint Venture’s steady research has port for research and analysis is usually diffi- been instrumental in several important region- cult, but these funders all expressed a keen al initiatives related to transportation, educa- interest in the results of this effort. tion, housing and the economy. A special thanks to Frederick Ferrer, In 2002, Cultural Initiatives Silicon Valley, Commission Chair of FIRST 5 Santa Clara with major support from the John S. and County, for the inspiration to collect data on James L. Knight Foundation, published the preschool children. Credit is also due to the first Creative Community Index. It presented Survey and Policy Research Institute at San data on cultural trends in Silicon Valley, the José State University, whose staff conducted a first since 20/21: A Regional Cultural Plan for remarkable random telephone survey of adult the New Millennium in 1997. Following up on residents of the Valley, and to the San José the 2002 Index, Cultural Initiatives separately Office of Cultural Affairs and Arts Council commissioned two anthropologists, Dr. Pia Silicon Valley for their assistance. Moriarty and Dr. Maribel Alvarez, to conduct field research and write first-ever reports on the condition of this region’s participatory (amateur) cultural activities. Dr. Moriarty’s report was released in May 2004, and Dr. Alvarez’s work will be published this fall. Susan Hammer Board President Cultural Initiatives Silicon Valley 1 Cultural Initiatives Silicon Valley Board of Directors Susan Hammer, President Ann Gralnek Kim Walesh, Vice President Michael Hackworth Robert Wayman, Treasurer Christine Harris Mai Bui Kim Polese Virginia Chang Kiraly Dr. Harry Saal Creative Community Index Advisors Paul Bains, Saint Samuels Church of God in Christ Chris Block, Charities Housing Development Corporation Dennise Carter, Carter McNulty Alexa Cortes Culwell Debra L. Dunn Phaedra Ellis-Lamkins, South Bay AFL-CIO Labor Council Chris Eyre, Legacy Venture John Ford, Stanford University Susan Goldberg, San Jose Mercury News Teresa Guerrero-Daley, Superior Court, Santa Clara County Ammar Hanafi, Alloy Ventures Talat Hasan, India Community Center Marc Jones, Visionael Corporation Vani Kola, Certus Diane Savage, Cooley Godward Scott Seaman, Los Gatos Police Department Bryan Stolle, Agile Software Amari Romero Thomas, United Way Silicon Valley Chui L. Tsang, San Jose City College Authors John Kreidler and Philip J. Trounstine Contributing Writer Jessica Zenk Technical Advisors Alan Brown, Brendan Rawson and Kim Walesh Editor and Production Manager Laura Jason Survey Manager Vanessa Shieh Design and Publication San Francisco Study Center D a ta Archive Cultural Policy and the Arts National Data Arc h i ve (CPA N DA), Princeton Un i ve r s i t y Copyright © 2005 Cultural Initiatives Silicon Valley Printed in the United States of America Cultural Initiatives Silicon Valley 1153 Lincoln Avenue, Suite I San José, California 95125-3009 Telephone: 408.283.7000, Facsimile: 408.283.2127 www.ci-sv.org This publication is made possible through the generous support of American Leadership Forum Silicon Valley, the John S. and James L. Knight Foundation, The James Irvine Foundation, The David and Lucile Packard Foundation, The William and Flora Hewlett Foundation and Adobe Systems Incorporated. Cover Photo: Girls perform classical Indian dances for packed crowds at the Hindu Temple and Community Center, South Bay, in Sunnyvale. Photographer: Raj Bhanot 2 We want leaders and residents to operate from an informed position in making Silicon Valley a more lively, satisfying, innovative place in which to live and work. Contents Welcome 1 Key Findings 4 What’s New in 2005 5 Why Art and Culture Are Important to Silicon Valley 5 The Cultural Ecology of Silicon Valley 6 Cultural Literacy: Children and Youth 8 Cultural Literacy: Adults 11 Participatory Cultural Practice 12 Professional Cultural Goods and Services: Nonprofit Cultural Organizations 14 Professional Cultural Goods and Services: Artists 17 Cultural Views and Aspirations of Regional Leaders 18 Recommendations 21 Sources of Data and Methodology 22 3 Arts and culture have vital practical relevance for the economy • Many Silicon Valley adults are and civil society of Silicon Valley. amateur artists: 55% reported par- ticipating in some cultural genre. The leading form of expression was playing a musical instrument (30%), followed by creative writing hours each school week. A major (22%), dancing (19%), painting KEY FINDINGS effort to restore arts education in (18%) and drawing (13%). They Creativity is widely the Valley’s K-5 schools is now average four to five hours per under way in three-fourths of week on these activities. valued in Silicon Valley Santa Clara County school dis- where many residents tricts as a result of Silicon Valley’s • The 52% of respondents who 1997 20/21 Regional Cultural Plan. participate in some form of civic exercise creativity on An independent evaluation of this activity and the 39% who volun- the job and in their effort shows strong results, but it teer regularly were significantly will take much more work to more likely to say arts play a daily lives attain the three to four hours a major role in their lives than those week of instruction favored by the who do neither (43% for both civic Overall, the regional “creative survey respondents. participants and volunteers, 31% commons,” the environment that of nonparticipants and 33% of • Significant correlations were promotes the generation of original nonvolunteers). These findings found between adults employed ideas, appears to be strong. are the strongest evidence among in creative occupations and their the 2005 data to support the • And yet, 58% of regional leaders participation in the arts. The assertion that the arts and culture surveyed for the Index said that Index’s 2005 telephone survey are correlated to enhanced civic Silicon Valley is slipping in its of 1,010 adults identified 406 engagement. ability to attract new creative tal- employed in jobs requiring cre- ent, even though creative workers ative skills. A significantly higher None of our data suggest that the want to live and work here and proportion of people in creative cultural ecology of Silicon Valley is, enjoy the region once they move occupations, 41%, indicated that as yet, in a state of crisis. Significant here. The data further suggest the arts played a major role in problems are apparent in K-12 arts that improvements in the arts, their lives, compared with 34% education, nonprofit cultural organ- leisure opportunities, and vibrant for people in noncreative jobs. izations, and for professional artists. urban neighborhoods would Creative workers consistently Significant opportunities are evi- make Silicon Valley more attrac- said they attended cultural out- dent in reaping greater public bene- tive to creative, talented people. ings more often than those whose fits from a robust tier of amateur jobs did not involve significant arts practice, and fulfilling the A dramatic finding is just how • creativity. For example, 33% of region’s aspiration to establish an many residents of the region want creative workers attended musical authentic cultural identity. These to learn more about the arts, and concerts, compared with 27% not problems and opportunities can be want children to receive substan- engaged in creative work. For addressed through intelligent lead- tial arts training from preschool movie attendance, the comparison ership, a Silicon Valley tradition. through high school. Nine of 10 was 63%/54%; for theater, 26%/21%; adults said arts education should for museums, 21%/15%; and for be required in the schools, and the dance, 23%/18%. Moreover, people median response was that they in creative jobs favored mandatory should be taught art three to four arts education at an exceptionally high rate, 92%, and they favored more hours per week of arts education than people in non- creative jobs. 4 WHAT’S NEW IN 2005 More and Better Data in the Index As in 2002, the 2005 Creative Community Index has • Recognizing that leadership is pivotal in any initia- assembled data from original surveys and secondary tive aimed at improving the regional cultural ecology, sources to achieve a broad understanding of Silicon the 2005 Index includes data from a new survey of Valley’s cultural ecology. Several new features have leaders in business, civic affairs, labor, education, been incorporated into the 2005 edition.
Recommended publications
  • A Master Plan Report OVERFELT GARDENS a Botanical Garden
    A Master Plan Report for OVERFELT GARDENS a botanical garden SAN JOSE CITY COUNCIL Thomas McEnery Mayor Blanca Alvarado Vice-Mayor/District 5 Lu Ryden District 1 Judy Stabile District 2 Susan Hammer District 3 Shirley Lewis District 4 Nancy Ianni District 6 Iola Williams District 7 Patricia Sausedo District 8 James Beall, Jr. District 9 Joe Head District 10 PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION Stanley E. Anderson Chairperson Joseph Guerra III Vice-Chairperson Virginia Holtz Commissioner Dr. Paul Brown Commissioner Ron Wood Commissioner Julie Sabadin Commissioner Jerry Strangis Commissioner Dr. Rodger Cryer Commissioner Charles Walton Commissioner CITY ADMINISTRATION Leslie R. White City Manager Robert G. Overstreet Director of Recreation, Parks and Community Services D. Kent Dewell Director of Public Works MASTER PLAN ELEMENTS.................................................................... 29 The Gardens................ 29 Percolation Ponds..................................................;..........................29 Chinese Cultural Garden................................................ •..................30 Botanical Center................................................................................30 Demonstration Garden.......................................................................30 Conservatory..................................................................................... 31 Orientation / Observation Deck........................................................31 Water Garden...................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • JUNTOS Initiative
    7/9/2020 Print/Preview Powered by ZoomGrants™ Santa Clara Valley Open Space Authority 2020 Urban Grant Program Deadline: 7/1/2020 Santa Clara County Public Health Department JUNTOS Initiative Jump to: Project Description Documents Upload $ 199,955.00 Requested Santa Clara County Public Health Department Submitted: 6/30/2020 11:43:58 AM Telephone408-817-6881 (Pacific) 1775 Story Road, Suite 120 Fax 408-251-4014 San Jose, CA 95122 Web www.sccphd.org Project Contact EIN 94-6000533 Michelle Wexler Senior Health Care Program [email protected] Manager Tel: 408-817-6881 Bonnie Broderick [email protected] Additional Contacts none entered Project Description top Applicant Type 1. What type of organization is this? ✔ Public Agency School or School District 501(c)3 Nonprofit Eligible organization acting as Fiscal Sponsor for another organization 2. Does the application include a fiscal sponsor? If the project includes a fiscal sponsor, the fiscal sponsor must be the applicant. YES ✔ NO Overview https://www.zoomgrants.com/printprop.asp?rfpidu=EAFEEA1775E740ADA668DE61AB8BC94A&propidu=1827D0E2B10C428BBA75DF3417C12D24 1/13 7/9/2020 Print/Preview 3. Which type of grant are you requesting? Small ($10,000 - $39,999) ✔ Large ($40,000 - $250,000) 4. Grant category (check all that apply) Environmental Stewardship and Restoration Parks, Trails, and Public Access ✔ Environmental Education ✔ Urban Agriculture / Food Systems 5. Type of project (check all that apply) Capital improvement (Large projects only) Planning ✔ Program 6. Project Location: Address / Neighborhood What is the physical location of the project? If there is no physical location, please enter "N/A." If the project will be in multiple locations, please list all.
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Cunningham Park Regional Park 8 4 183.25 Alum Rock Park 15350 Penitencia Creek Rd
    Developed Council Park Area (in Name Address Park Type District District acres) Lake Cunningham Park Regional Park 8 4 183.25 Alum Rock Park 15350 Penitencia Creek Rd. Regional Park 4 6 77.5 Kelley Park Regional Park 7 7 47.44 Kelley Park - Happy Hollow Park and Zoo Regional Park 7 7 41.57 Penitencia Creek Park Neighborhood Park 4 8 36.65 Emma Prusch Farm Park Regional Park 5 6 36.41 Cataldi Park Neighborhood Park 4 8 33.97 Overfelt Gardens Regional Park 5 6 32.04 Almaden Lake Park 6099 Winfield Blvd Regional Park 10 1 30.4 Guadalupe Gardens Regional Park 3 5 27.23 Watson Park Neighborhood Park 3 5 22.32 Municipal Baseball Stadium Sports Facility 7 7 19.22 Edenvale Garden Park Regional Park 2 2 18.76 Jeffery Fontana Park Neighborhood Park 10 1 18.05 T.J. Martin Park Neighborhood Park 10 1 15.75 Calabazas Park Neighborhood Park 1 3 15.12 Arcadia Ballpark Regional Park 8 4 15.08 P.A.L. Stadium Park Sports Facility 5 6 14.28 Hillview Park Neighborhood Park 5 6 14.04 Willow Street Frank Bramhall Park Neighborhood Park 6 3 13.63 Roosevelt Park Neighborhood Park 3 5 13.62 Flickinger Park Neighborhood Park 4 8 13.53 La Colina Park Neighborhood Park 2 1 12.58 Houge Park Neighborhood Park 9 3 12.22 Evergreen Park Neighborhood Park 8 4 12.1 Capitol Park Neighborhood Park 5 6 11.91 Los Paseos Park Neighborhood Park 2 1 11.8 Fowler Creek Park Neighborhood Park 8 4 11.68 Great Oaks Park Neighborhood Park 2 2 11.54 Groesbeck Hill Park Neighborhood Park 8 4 11.46 John Mise Park Neighborhood Park 1 3 11.45 Backesto Park 13th Street and Empire Street
    [Show full text]
  • Council Report Writing Format
    PRC AGENDA: 5/5/2021 ITEM: VI. D. 2. TO: PARKS AND RECREATION FROM: David Delong COMMISSION SUBJECT: PRNS BUDGET DISCUSSION DATE: 4/13/2021 Approved Date The Parks, Recreation and Neighborhood Services Department will provide the Parks and Recreation Commission with a brief update on changes being advanced for the Department in the Proposed 2021-2022 Operating Budget, and respond to Commissioner inquiries about the budget development process, in general. /s/ David Delong Interim Division Manager Park, Recreation and Neighborhood Services For questions, please contact CJ Ryan, Interim Administrative Officer, at (408) 793-4175. PRC AGENDA: 5/5/2021 ITEM: VI. D. 2. 1 2021-2022 BUDGET UPDATE CJ Ryan, Interim Administrative Officer Parks and Recreation Commission May 5, 2021 PRC AGENDA: 5/5/2021 ITEM: VI. D. 2. 2 Context • Estimated $38.2 M shortfall over 5 years • Uncertainty in forecast • Federal Funding providing one-time monies • Equity in budgeting process PRC AGENDA: 5/5/2021 ITEM: VI. D. 2. 3 Parks Community Community Maintenance Facilities Services Development and Operations Recreation Strategic Services Support PRC AGENDA: 5/5/2021 2021-2022 Proposed Budget SummaryITEM: VI. D. 2. 4 Title FTE All Funds General Fund Ongoing Beautify San José Management Consolidation and Operations 34.00 $ 5,476,135 $ 2,776,615 Placemaking/San José Abierto Program 13.25 Project Hope 4.00 Police Activities League Facilities Support 4.00 $ 327,553 $ 327,553 New Parks and Recreation Facilities Maintenance and Operations 4.30 $ 275,309 $ 384,000 $ 510,000
    [Show full text]
  • Audubon at Home
    The Newsletter of the Santa Clara Audubon Society May-June 2004 Audubon at home wanted to plant native and Annual Potluck Youryard is an importantbird habitat- Mediterranean plants to landscapeand maintainit accordingly minimize water use. They did Dinner June 9 great for the first few years, -all members by Nancy Teater but were soon shaded out by welcome! -Page4 Many yards in the Bay Area are landscaped using the "one of my large California Live Oak, these and one of those" plan. Since most things grow well here, redwood tree, and my those cute little bushes and trees that were planted a few years neighbor's Deodora and Incense Cedars. The natives are now ago may now be a hodgepodge that is difficult to maintain and on their last gasp because they don't get enough sun. Only the not particularly attractive. If this describes your yard and Western Sword Fern flourishes; I have replaced the others with you're thinking of making some changes, you can find many plants more suitable for shade. However, with the oak and resources to help you create a healthy yard that is safe for people redwood, I do have some nice habitat. My birding yard list and pets and attractive to birds and other wildlife. includes resident Bewick's Wren, Oak Titmouse, Chestnut­ One such resource is a new section of National Audubon backed Chickadee, House Finch, California Towhee, Anna's Society's website called "Audubon At Home" Hummingbird, and Western Scrub-Jay as well as visiting <www.audubon .org/bird/at_home/ >. Audubon suggests what Nuttall' s Woodpecker, Cedar Waxwing, Black Phoebe, Lesser I'll call the "more and less" approach: more bird feeding, native and American Goldfinch, White-crowned Sparrow, and Hermit plants, water features, and nest sites; less invasive plants, turf Thrush.
    [Show full text]
  • Sanjose___Memorandum
    ARTS COMMISSION: 5-21-18 ITEM: v. i.C. i CITY OF c a SANjOSE______________ Memorandum CAPITAL OF SILICON VALLEY TO: ARTS COMMISSION FROM: Kerry Adams Hapner SUBJECT: PROPOSED FY 2018-2019 DATE: May 8, 2018 FESTIVAL, PARADE & CELEBRATION GRANT AWARDS Approved DatC /-jcy JC, <9o/s RECOMMENDATION Recommend that the City Council approve the proposed FY 2018-2019 Festival, Parade and Celebration Grant awards specified in Attachment A and subject to the availability of funds appropriated in the City's FY 2018-2019 Operating Budget. BACKGROUND Through the Office of Cultural Affairs (OCA), the City of San Jose provides a limited number of Festival, Parade & Celebration Grant (FPC) awards each year in order to expand access for all City residents to a wide range of cultural experiences in the form of community festivals, parades and celebrations, large and small. These events are often held in public spaces and are always open to the entire public. Most FPC-supported events have free attendance, although a few have fee- based admission to some parts of or the entire event. In various ways, these festivals contribute to the City’s cultural enrichment and economic enhancement, and they help to promote the City to visitors. As noted in the guidelines, FPC funding is granted through a competitive process. Applications are weighed each year by a review panel for their responsiveness to the evaluation criteria published in the program information booklet. ANALYSIS The panel met on March 1 - 2, 2018 to complete its evaluation and was impressed by the overall quality and quantity of cultural offerings in San Jose.
    [Show full text]
  • Silicon Valley Imperialists Create New Model Villages As Smart Cities in Their Own Image
    Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity Article Silicon Valley Imperialists Create New Model Villages as Smart Cities in Their Own Image Philip Cooke Mohn Center for Innovation & Regional Development, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, 5020 Bergen, Norway; cookepn@cardiff.ac.uk Received: 13 March 2020; Accepted: 27 March 2020; Published: 8 April 2020 Abstract: In her study of ‘Surveillance Capitalism’, Shoshana Zuboff cites Google’s parent firm Alphabet’s legal customer-purchase agreement for the parent firm’s Nest thermostats. These impose ‘oppressive privacy and security consequences’ requiring sensitive information to be shared through ‘Internet-of-Things’ (IoT) networks with other domestic and external devices, unnamed functionaries and various third parties. This is for data harvesting, analytics, processing, manipulation and transformation through digital re-sale to the same and other consumers in the form of unwanted, targeted advertising. The point of this identity ‘rendition’ is to massively augment corporate profits. It is but a short step from trapping the unwitting consumer in a ‘smart home’ to planning a similarly mediated ‘smart city’ aimed at further massively augmenting corporate profits. This is happening, as founders of digital media from Google, Facebook, Microsoft, Amazon and Tesla either commission or become beneficiaries of ‘smart city’ planning. However, there is evidence that such imperiousness is increasingly countered by emerging democratic critique of these new ‘model villages’ or ‘company towns’. Keywords: digital innovations; company towns; smart cities; surveillance capitalism 1. Introduction In recent years, such has been the rapid and successful growth of their corporate profits that Facebook, Amazon, Google, Alphabet and Microsoft (FAGAMi) firms specialising in the design or exploitation of identity theft, big data analytics and automated social media advertising that they have had to create new digital accumulation opportunities.
    [Show full text]
  • Alameda Business Association
    Festival, Parade and Celebrations Grants Grant Amount Alameda Business Association $ 15,285 Event: Rose, White & Blue 4th of July Parade Grant will support the Rose, White and Blue 4th of July Parade and Picnic on July 4, 2015. Over 100 groups participate in the parade that traverses the Historic Shasta/Hanchett and Rose Garden Neighborhoods and finishes on The Alameda, with a festival and picnic to follow. Almaden Valley Women's Club $ 12,904 Event: Almaden Valley Art and Wine Festival Grant will support the 39th annual Almaden Valley Art and Wine Festival on September 20, 2015 at Almaden Lake Park. The festival includes juried arts and crafts with over 90 artists, international food, local entertainment, and a children’s area of arts, crafts and sports activities. Asian Americans for Community Involvement, Inc. $ 3,778 Event: CAAMFest San Jose Grant will support CAAMFest San Jose during September 17 - 20, 2015 at Camera 3 Theater in San Jose. Asian Americans for Community Involvement (AACI) joins in efforts with Center for Asian American Media (CAAM) to present the four day Asian film festival that reflects the diverse population of Asian Americans in San Jose and Santa Clara County. Campus Community Association $ 16,475 Event: Bark in the Park Grant will support the 19th Bark in the Park event on September 19, 2015 at William Street Park in the Naglee Park Neighborhood in downtown San Jose. The family- oriented event centers around the family canine and offers an educational stage, activities areas, demonstrations, children’s activities, food, live entertainment and vendor booths. Chinese Performing Arts of America $ 12,904 Event: CPAA Spring Festival Grant will support the 8th annual Spring Festival Silicon Valley scheduled during February 26 – March 6, 2016.
    [Show full text]
  • Caret Explains Issues with Media
    WII11111119,1 VOLUME 10II, NO. 52 WEDNESDAY APRIL 1 6 , 1 9 9 7 INSIDE SPORTS rOeig Ow Short-handed Spartans *.*** Students relax in the Pur fall to No. 7 Cardinal tvv** 44. shade between classes Page 4 kV/ Page 6 SPARTANServing San Jose State University DAILY Since 1934 Caret explains issues with media University president expands on scholarships, serach for student affairs administrator Spartan Daily staff Report of San Jose library to be developed and fund- to four. ed by both the university and the city. He The vice president is responsible for over- San Jose State University President said that two sites under consideration to be seeing student outreach, disabled services, Robert Caret held a news conference on demolished are Hugh Gillis Hall and counseling and oversees students, among Tuesday, expanding on a slate of issues, Wahlquist Librar),,,, but Caret admitted that other duties. including a scholarship program, the SJSU he wouldn't know what to do with the staff Caret is responsible for choosing the vice Foundation, the joint city-university library, in those buildings. president after the list of final applicants who and the search for a new vice president of Caret also said that the city is eager to have been interviewed by the search commit- Student Affairs. approve any site along South Fourth Street. tee is submitted to him. The SJSU Foundation has been plagued Caret said that plans for a scholarship pro- The final candidates will appear on cam- by problems recently, signaled by a drop in gram were moving ahead. Under the plan, pus over the next two weeks.
    [Show full text]
  • Park Ranger Program Annual Report Page 2 of 8
    PSFSS COMMITTEE: 3/16/17 ITEM: (d) 3 CITY OF SAN IPSE Memorandum CAPITAL OF SILICON VALLEY TO: PUBLIC SAFETY, FINANCE, AND FROM: Angel Rios, Jr. STRATEGIC SUPPORT COMMITTEE SUBJECT: PARK RANGER PROGRAM DATE: March 8, 2017 ANNUAL REPORT Approved Date .5 A - n RECOMMENDATION Accept the 2016 Annual Report on the Park Ranger Program. BACKGROUND The City of San Jose's Park Ranger Program is an integral part of the Parks, Recreation and Neighborhood Services Department (PRNS). Its mission is to provide a safe, enjoyable park experience by protecting and educating the public, providing recreational opportunities, and protecting, preserving, and enhancing the natural and cultural resources of the City's parks, trails and open spaces. The Park Ranger Program has its roots in resource and visitor protection. The City established the Park Ranger Unit in 1972 after a period in the 1960's and early 1970's when San Jose's park system expanded rapidly and crime and vandalism were deterring residents from using parks. A community task force convened to address crime issues at Alum Rock Park and other neighborhood parks and recommended adding Park Rangers. Originally, Park Rangers were Auxiliary Police Officers, appointed by the Chief of Police and granted Peace Officer powers while on duty. The Park Ranger Unit provided law enforcement services along with land management and visitor services. Park Rangers underwent police academy training, and the Police Department provided them with equipment and vehicles for their work. By the late 1970's, the San Jose Police Department created a Parks Enforcement Unit to provide a higher level of enforcement (rather than arming San Jose's Park Rangers).
    [Show full text]
  • Facilities and Programs CHAPTER 4
    Facilities & Programs CHAPTER 4_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ CHAPTER 4 Facilities & Programs The City operates and maintains a wide array of San José Family Camp recreation facilities to provide a high quality of life Non-City owned parks and recreation facilities in San José. Under the direction of the Parks, include land owned by Santa Clara County Recreation and Neighborhood Services Open Space Authority (OSA), Santa Clara Department (PRNS), the City provides and County Parks and Recreation, Santa Clara manages approximately 3,520 acres of parks Valley Water District (SCVWD) and various (regional/city-wide and neighborhood/ School Districts community), community gardens and open space lands. In addition, the City has plans for Following is a partial list of the programs and implementation to bestow over a 100-mile services the Department is currently responsible network of multi-use trails and greenways. PRNS for or participates in: also provides management for over 50 community facilities to serve the indoor recreational needs of a Mayors Gang Prevention Task Force growing urban population. Youth Intervention Services Safe School Campus Initiative (SSCI) Following is a list of these City and non-City Striving Towards Achievement with New owned and managed facilities: Direction (STAND) Clean Slate Parks San José Bringing Everyone’s Strengths Neighborhood/Community Parks Together (BEST) Citywide/Regional Parks After School Programs and
    [Show full text]
  • Open Space and Placemaking
    DRAFT 46 4 Open Space & Placemaking 4Berryessa BART Urban Village Area Plan Workshop #1 Briefing 47 DRAFTOpen Space & Placemaking 4Open Space Park BLOOMING CREEK WALK MULTI-USE PATH PLAYGROUND BART PLAZA FLEXIBLE PERFORMANCE STAGE PENITENCIA CREEK BERRYESSA ROAD COYOTE CREEK Figure 4-1: Open Space Park Concept Plan Note: This conceptual rendering does not represent a final design. It was developed to of placemaking elements and qualities that could support the design of an accessible com- convey the intent and vision for the park. This illustration demonstrates the importance munity-focused park space. For specific policy direction, see Policy 2-2 in this Chapter. 48 DRAFT This Chapter guides creation of new publicly- INTRODUCTION accessible open spaces and placemaking elements At the same time, this chapter highlights the location and character of Coyote within the Berryessa BART Urban Village. This and Penitencia Creeks as existing open space assets that offer public recreation chapter identifies opportunities for new parks, opportunities within the defined boundaries of the Urban Village and that can be integrated towards an open space system that works for the entire Urban Village plazas, and public art that can enrich recreational as a whole. The goal is to capitalize on this open space system to provide cultural experience and quality of life for existing residents amenities and recreational experiences that enrich the quality of life for existing and and future residents as further development occurs future residents as well as
    [Show full text]