DOCSLIB.ORG

Burkean Frames in Phyllis Schlafly's Equal Rights Amendment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Burkean Frames in Phyllis Schlafly's Equal Rights Amendment The Feminine Mistake: Burkean Frames in Phyllis Schlafly’s Equal Rights Amendment Speeches Kayla J. Hastrup Thesis submitted to the faculty of the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts In Communication Jim A. Kuypers, Chair Robert E. Denton, Jr. Rachel L. Holloway April 29, 2015 Blacksburg, Virginia Keywords: Phyllis Schlafly, Equal Rights Amendment, Burkean frames, feminism The Feminine Mistake: Burkean Frames in Phyllis Schlafly’s Equal Rights Amendment Speeches Kayla J. Hastrup ABSTRACT Situated within the larger scholarship on the women’s liberation movement of the 1970s exists a body of literature that analyzes the rhetorical functions of pro- and anti- Equal Rights Amendment messages in relation to communication studies. Although limited in scope, this literature acknowledges the tremendous impact of Phyllis Schlafly’s STOP ERA campaign in the prevention of the ratification and unratification of states. However, with the exception of a few theses and dissertations, a lion’s share of published articles proclaim the STOP ERA and Schlafly herself to be predominantly negative and serve solely as prevailing threats to the women’s movement. As a result, heterogeneous scholarship grounded in communication theory proves limited when applied to critical rhetorical analyses of anti-feminist rhetoric. Using Kenneth Burke’s frames of acceptance and rejection as a perspective for rhetorical criticism, this thesis demonstrates how Schlafly’s conservative ideals functioned rhetorically through acceptance-based frames in the past, and through rejection-based frames after the failed ERA ratification in 1982. In doing so, I provide today’s scholars with an important body of knowledge to further examine the ERA debate and its influence on contemporary feminism. Until rhetoric is fully explored within the cultural and historical conditions distinctive to Schlafly’s main speeches during the ERA debate, meaningful debate about the women’s movement and feminism’s current state is subject to remain truncated. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank my thesis committee members for their continued patience and support of my project. First, I wish to thank Dr. Jim Kuypers for providing the encouragement and guidance needed to facilitate my growth as a communication scholar. Since my very first semester as a Master’s student, you have challenged me to be a better researcher, writer, and critical thinker. Because of that, I am confident and excited to continue my path as an academic and life-long learner. I would also like to thank Dr. Bob Denton and Dr. Rachel Holloway for lending their significant expertise and wonderful insights to help create a research project that I am proud of and value. The support I received from each of you in developing this thesis has been invaluable. Thank you. I also wish to thank several faculty members in the department of communication at Virginia Tech for their unreserved and continued support of my academic and teaching career, including Dr. Jimmy Ivory, Dr. John Tedesco, Dr. Buddy Howell, and Brandi Quesenberry. I only hope that one day I can be half as good a teacher as all of you. I would be remiss if I did not mention how much I appreciate Dr. Beth Waggenspack for providing constant encouragement since day one, and for helping me through some very difficult times. I could not have made it through without you, and for that I am eternally thankful. Finally, I wish to thank my friends and classmates for always willing to be my sounding board. And, of course, my family for always being there and supporting me with whatever I chose to do. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract Acknowledgements ......................................................................................................... iii Table of Contents ............................................................................................................ iv Chapter 1. Introduction ..................................................................................................... 1 Chapter 2. Review of Literature ........................................................................................ 6 Phyllis Schlafly ..................................................................................................... 6 Equal Rights Amendment ..................................................................................... 7 STOP ERA ................................................................................................ 9 Equal Rights and Feminism in Scholarship ........................................................ 12 Burkean Frames of Reference ............................................................................. 15 Frames of Acceptance ............................................................................. 17 Frames of Rejection ................................................................................ 19 Chapter 3. Description of Artifact and Method .............................................................. 23 Applying Burkean Frames for Criticism ............................................................. 23 Criticism as a Method ......................................................................................... 24 Schlafly’s ERA Speeches ................................................................................... 25 Potential Problems and Pitfalls ........................................................................... 27 Chapter 4. Analysis 1 ...................................................................................................... 29 Speech 1—1975 .................................................................................................. 29 Speech 2—1977 .................................................................................................. 36 Chapter 5. Analysis 2 ...................................................................................................... 40 Speech 3—1984 .................................................................................................. 40 Speech 4—2002 .................................................................................................. 44 Speech 5—2007 .................................................................................................. 49 Chapter 6. Discussion and Conclusions .......................................................................... 57 Summary ............................................................................................................. 57 Analysis 1 ................................................................................................ 57 Analysis 2 ................................................................................................ 60 Theoretical Implications ..................................................................................... 61 Practical Implications .......................................................................................... 63 Third Wave Feminism ............................................................................ 64 Conclusion .......................................................................................................... 66 iv Appendix A. Speech 1 Transcript ................................................................................... 68 Appendix B. Speech 2 Transcript ................................................................................... 89 Appendix C. Speech 3 Transcript ................................................................................... 91 Appendix D. Speech 4 Transcript ................................................................................... 99 Appendix E. Speech 5 Transcript .................................................................................. 118 Notes .............................................................................................................................. 129 v CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION In a September 2008 issue of In These Times, a politically progressive democratic magazine of news and opinion articles, Susan Douglas, a feminist academic in communication studies and a cultural critic, criticized Sarah Palin for her use of feminism to repudiate feminist causes.1 In this article, “Feminism Without Feminism,” Douglas briefly made a comparison between Palin and Phyllis Schlafly. When asked if she thought this was an apt comparison during the interview with representatives of Journal of Communication Inquiry (JCI), Douglas replied with a surprising admiration for Schlafly’s intellect: She’s [Palin] benefited from feminism, which she has done everything in her politics, appearance, and her manner to destroy. That’s why she’s worse than Schlafly. … I disagree fundamentally and profoundly with her politics, but Phyllis Schlafly was an incredibly hard- working, smart, shrewd woman. She pretty much single-handedly defeated the ERA. She has support, help, and a network, but she was very smart. And that’s what her strength was.2 Douglas’s response represents a seemingly undisputed view by Equal Rights Amendment (ERA) activists and historians concerning Schlafly. Love her or loathe her, Schlafly was the most recognized leader in opposition to the liberal side of the women’s liberation movement. She spearheaded the successful grassroots campaigns against the ERA with the STOP ERA, a group mobilized in 1972 to defeat ratification of the ERA. However, little critical research has examined her effectively persuasive
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Excerpts from Mackinnon/Schlafly Debate
    Minnesota Journal of Law & Inequality Volume 1 Issue 2 Article 4 December 1983 Excerpts from MacKinnon/Schlafly Debate Catharine A. MacKinnon Follow this and additional works at: https://lawandinequality.org/ Recommended Citation Catharine A. MacKinnon, Excerpts from MacKinnon/Schlafly Debate, 1(2) LAW & INEQ. 341 (1983). Available at: https://scholarship.law.umn.edu/lawineq/vol1/iss2/4 Minnesota Journal of Law & Inequality is published by the University of Minnesota Libraries Publishing. Excerpts from MacKinnon/Schlafly Debate Catharine A. MacKinnon Introduction In the waning months of the most recent attempt to ratify a federal Equal Rights Amendment (ERA), I twice debated Phyllis Schlafly, its leading opponent since 1973 '-once at Stanford Law School', once in Los Angeles.' The argument printed here is from my presentations. I had not been actively involved in the ratification effort, had not spoken on ERA before, and had been persuaded to modify my criticism of its leading interpretation' because I did not want to undercut its chances for approval. I still do not know if it was right to remain silent while the debate on the meaning of sex equality was defined in liberal terms, thereby excluding the issues most central to the status of women and the issues most crucial to most women. Pursuing an untried, if more true, analysis of sex inequality risked losing something that might, once gained, be more meaningfully interpreted. Acquiescence in this calculation overcame the sense that ERA's theory, and strategies based on it, would not only limit its value if won, but insure its loss--a conviction that grew with each setback.
    [Show full text]
  • The True Story of 'Mrs. America' | History | Smithsonian Magazine 4/16/20, 907 PM the True Story of ‘Mrs
    The True Story of 'Mrs. America' | History | Smithsonian Magazine 4/16/20, 907 PM The True Story of ‘Mrs. Americaʼ In the new miniseries, feminist history, dramatic storytelling and an all-star-cast bring the Equal Rights Amendment back into the spotlight Cate Blanchett plays conservative activist Phyllis Schlafly (Sabrina Lantos / FX) By Jeanne Dorin McDowell smithsonianmag.com April 15, 2020 It is 1973, and conservative activist Phyllis Schlafly and feminist icon Betty https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/true-story-mrs-america-180974675/ Page 1 of 11 The True Story of 'Mrs. America' | History | Smithsonian Magazine 4/16/20, 907 PM Friedan trade verbal barbs in a contentious debate over the Equal Rights Amendment at Illinois State University. Friedan, author of The Feminine Mystique and “the mother of the modern womenʼs movement,” argues that a constitutional amendment guaranteeing men and women equal treatment under the law would put a stop to discriminatory legislation that left divorced women without alimony or child support. On the other side, Schlafly, an Illinois mother of six who has marshalled an army of conservative housewives into an unlikely political force to fight the ERA, declares American women “the luckiest class of people on earth.” Then Schlafly goes for the jugular. “You simply cannot legislate universal sympathy for the middle-aged woman,” she purrs, knowing that Friedan had been through a bitter divorce. “You, Mrs. Friedan, are the unhappiest women I have ever met.” “You are a traitor to your sex, an Aunt Tom,” fumes Friedan, taking the bait. “And you are a witch. God, Iʼd like to burn you at the stake!” Friedanʼs now-infamous rejoinder is resurrected in this fiery exchange in “Mrs.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservative Women's Activism from Anticommunism to the New Christian Right
    Hollins University Hollins Digital Commons Undergraduate Honors Theses Honors Theses 2021 Mothers, Morals, and Godly Motivations: Conservative Women’s Activism from Anticommunism to the New Christian Right Kaitlyn C. Phillips Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.hollins.edu/ughonors Part of the United States History Commons, and the Women's History Commons MOTHERS, MORALS, AND GODLY MOTIVATIONS: CONSERVATIVE WOMEN’S ACTIVISM FROM ANTICOMMUNISM TO THE NEW CHRISTIAN RIGHT A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the degree of Bachelor of Arts Department of History Hollins University May 2021 By Kaitlyn C. Phillips TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION: 1 CHAPTER ONE: The Minute Women: Anticommunist Women, Domesticity and Conservative Unity 8 CHAPTER TWO: Phyllis Schlafly: The Privileged Status of Women and Idealized National Identity 20 CHAPTER THREE: Beverly LaHaye: The Evangelical Essentials and Women in the New Christian Right 35 CONCLUSION: 51 BIBLIOGRAPHY: 55 ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS To start, I want to thank Dr. Nunez for her guidance, care, and wisdom throughout this thesis process and my entire time at Hollins. Your kindness and sense of humor have brightened my days countless times, and when I think of myself as a potential scholar, I hope to be as thoughtful, knowledgeable, and passionate as you are. Additionally, I want to thank Dr. Florio and Dr. Coogan for their time, knowledge, and support. You have helped me in numerous ways and I am incredibly grateful for you both. I want to thank my father, Steven Phillips, for being just as big of a history nerd as I am. Lastly, I want to remember my grandfather Donald Bruaw, who showed me how to love history.
    [Show full text]
  • The New Right
    W&M ScholarWorks Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects 1984 The New Right Elizabeth Julia Reiley College of William & Mary - Arts & Sciences Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/etd Part of the Political Science Commons Recommended Citation Reiley, Elizabeth Julia, "The New Right" (1984). Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects. Paper 1539625286. https://dx.doi.org/doi:10.21220/s2-mnnb-at94 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE NEW RIGHT 'f A Thesis Presented to The Faculty of the Department of Sociology The College of William and Mary in Virginia In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts by Elizabeth Reiley 1984 This thesis is submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Elizabeth Approved, May 1984 Edwin H . Rhyn< Satoshi Ito Dedicated to Pat Thanks, brother, for sharing your love, your life, and for making us laugh. We feel you with us still. Presente! iii. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ........................... v ABSTRACT.................................... vi INTRODUCTION ................................ s 1 CHAPTER I. THE NEW RIGHT . '............ 6 CHAPTER II. THE 1980 ELECTIONS . 52 CHAPTER III. THE PRO-FAMILY COALITION . 69 CHAPTER IV. THE NEW RIGHT: BEYOND 1980 95 CHAPTER V. CONCLUSION ............... 114 BIBLIOGRAPHY .................................. 130 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The writer wishes to express her appreciation to all the members of her committee for the time they gave to the reading and criticism of the manuscript, especially Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • SAY NO to the LIBERAL MEDIA: CONSERVATIVES and CRITICISM of the NEWS MEDIA in the 1970S William Gillis Submitted to the Faculty
    SAY NO TO THE LIBERAL MEDIA: CONSERVATIVES AND CRITICISM OF THE NEWS MEDIA IN THE 1970S William Gillis Submitted to the faculty of the University Graduate School in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in the School of Journalism, Indiana University June 2013 ii Accepted by the Graduate Faculty, Indiana University, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Doctoral Committee David Paul Nord, Ph.D. Mike Conway, Ph.D. Tony Fargo, Ph.D. Khalil Muhammad, Ph.D. May 10, 2013 iii Copyright © 2013 William Gillis iv Acknowledgments I would like to thank the helpful staff members at the Brigham Young University Harold B. Lee Library, the Detroit Public Library, Indiana University Libraries, the University of Kansas Kenneth Spencer Research Library, the University of Louisville Archives and Records Center, the University of Michigan Bentley Historical Library, the Wayne State University Walter P. Reuther Library, and the West Virginia State Archives and History Library. Since 2010 I have been employed as an editorial assistant at the Journal of American History, and I want to thank everyone at the Journal and the Organization of American Historians. I thank the following friends and colleagues: Jacob Groshek, Andrew J. Huebner, Michael Kapellas, Gerry Lanosga, J. Michael Lyons, Beth Marsh, Kevin Marsh, Eric Petenbrink, Sarah Rowley, and Cynthia Yaudes. I also thank the members of my dissertation committee: Mike Conway, Tony Fargo, and Khalil Muhammad. Simply put, my adviser and dissertation chair David Paul Nord has been great. Thanks, Dave. I would also like to thank my family, especially my parents, who have provided me with so much support in so many ways over the years.
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Figures in Social Studies Teks Draft – October 17, 2009
    HISTORICAL FIGURES IN SOCIAL STUDIES TEKS DRAFT – OCTOBER 17, 2009 FOLLOW THE WORD FOLLOW THE WORDS “SUCH GRADE OR INTRODUCTION “INCLUDING” (REQUIRED TO BE AS” (EXAMPLES OF WHAT MAY COURSE TAUGHT) BE TAUGHT) Kindergarten George Washington Stephen F. Austin No additional historical figures are George Washington listed. Grade 1 Abraham Lincoln Sam Houston Clara Harlow Barton (moved to Gr. 3) Martin Luther King, Jr. Alexander Graham Bell Abraham Lincoln Thomas Edison George Washington Nathan Hale (moved to Gr. 5) Sam Houston (moved to including) Frances Scott Key Martin Luther King, Jr.(to including) Abraham Lincoln (moved to including) Benjamin Franklin Garrett Morgan Eleanor Roosevelt Grade 2 No historical figures are listed. No specific historical figures are Abigail Adams required. George Washington Carver Amelia Earhart Robert Fulton Henrietta C. King (deleted) Thurgood Marshall Florence Nightingale (deleted) Irma Rangel Paul Revere (deleted) Theodore Roosevelt Sojourner Truth Women Airforce Service Pilots (WASP) of World War II Black = In Current TEKS and 10/17/09 Draft; Green = Recommended Additions; Red = Recommended Deletions 1 Historical figures listed alphabetically by last name HISTORICAL FIGURES IN SOCIAL STUDIES TEKS DRAFT – OCTOBER 17, 2009 FOLLOW THE WORD FOLLOW THE WORDS “SUCH GRADE OR INTRODUCTION “INCLUDING” (REQUIRED TO BE AS” (EXAMPLES OF WHAT MAY COURSE TAUGHT) BE TAUGHT) Grade 3 Paul Bunyan Benjamin Banneker Wallace Amos Clara Barton Mary Kay Ash Todd Beamer Jane Addams (moved to Gr. 5) Christopher Columbus Pecos Bill (deleted) Founding Fathers Daniel Boone (deleted) Henry Ford Paul Bunyan (deleted) Benjamin Franklin William Clark (moved to Gr. 5) Dr. Hector P. Garcia Christopher Columbus (to including) Dolores Huerta David Crockett (moved to Gr.
    [Show full text]
  • JF07-National Copy.Indd
    Making a Case against the Courts How will Americans know that their Supreme Court is truly Scott decision of 1857, that dedicated to interpreting the Constitution as the Founding Fa- the Supreme Court cannot thers would wish? Attorney, activist, and author Phyllis Schlafly, be allowed to set the law. A.M. ’45, offered some guidelines while discussing “The Culture “Activist” judges who see War in the Courts” on October 15 as part of the 2007-2008 the Constitution as a “living Phyllis Dean’s Lecture Series at the Radcliffe Institute for Advanced document” have used that Schlafly Study. Homeowners won’t face seizure of their property by mu- claim incrementally to take nicipalities eagerly seeking to increase the local tax base, she away the supremacy of the people, she charged. Thus the Fifth said. “Unborn babies” will be entitled to protection under the Amendment prohibition against governmental seizure of private Fourteenth Amendment, while gun-control laws and federal property except for public “use” was sufficiently diluted by a 50- funding of K-12 education will be abandoned.And public-school year-old judicial wording shift to public “purpose” that in 2005 a students will spend more time saying prayers than learning how Supreme Court majority could allow New London, Connecticut, to use a condom. to seize homes to make way for a business venture that might A polished, impeccably prepared speaker, Schlafly provided a generate more taxes. She provided similar examples, in her torrent of legal references, snappy comments, and vivid anec- speech and in reply to subsequent questions, covering other dotes to make her case to an audience of roughly 150, including areas of concern to her: parental rights, pornography, religious Radcliffe’s interim dean, Higgins professor of natural sciences freedom, and homosexuality.
    [Show full text]
  • Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg
    VOLUME 134 JANUARY 2021 NUMBER 3 © 2021 by The Harvard Law Review Association MEMORIAM: JUSTICE RUTH BADER GINSBURG The editors of the Harvard Law Review respectfully offer this collec- tion of tributes to Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg. Brenda Feigen∗ Ruth Bader Ginsburg changed all our lives by profoundly influenc- ing the law that had encouraged sex discrimination in the United States for centuries. I am writing now in tribute to her. In the nineteenth century, the Supreme Court ruled that women had neither the right to practice law1 nor the right to vote.2 In the mid- twentieth century, the Court approved “beneficial” practices by states making women’s service on juries optional3 and approved Michigan’s law preventing women from working in bars unless a male relative was present when they were working.4 In 1970, while some of us were joining the call of the women’s liber- ation movement to march in protest of outrageous sex discrimination, Ruth and her husband Marty, a tax lawyer, decided to represent Charles Moritz, who lived alone with his elderly mother and had tried to obtain a tax deduction for wages paid to her caregiver.5 The Tax Court had said that type of deduction was available only “to a woman, a widower ––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– ∗ J.D. 1969, Harvard Law School. Ms. Feigen directed the ACLU’s Women’s Rights Project with then-Professor Ruth Bader Ginsburg. She was National Vice President for Legislation of NOW and a cofounder of the National Women’s Political Caucus and of Ms. Magazine. She au- thored Not One of the Boys: Living Life as a Feminist (2000), republished in electronic format twenty years later with a new edition forthcoming.
    [Show full text]
  • The Two Women's Movements
    The Two Women’s Movements Feminism has been on the march since the 1970s, but so has the conservative backlash. By Kim Phillips-Fein June 1, 2017 Phyllis Schlafly at a rally at the Illinois State Capitol in 1977. (AP) Not even death could stop Phyllis Schlafly. Her final broadside, The Conservative Case for Trump, was released the day after she died at the age of 92 last September. It was a fitting bookend to her first, A Choice Not an Echo, her self-published endorsement of Barry Goldwater for president in 1964. Unlike many other Christian conservatives who backed Texas Senator Ted Cruz in the GOP’s 2016 primaries, Schlafly supported Trump from the outset. Early in the year, she gave an hour-long interview to Breitbart News, making the case that Trump represented the only chance to overturn the “kingmakers” (her word for the Republican establishment). Like Trump, Schlafly’s politics were often focused on a muscular concept of national security. She wanted to see a “fence” protecting the country’s southern border, and she argued that Democrats were recruiting “illegals” in order to bolster their electoral chances. Despite his three marriages, she saw Trump as an “old-fashioned” man whose priorities were hard work and family. After Schlafly died, Trump returned the love. He gave a eulogy at her funeral in the Cathedral Basilica of St. Louis, raising a finger to deliver a promise: “We will never, ever let you down.” Schlafly emerged on the national scene in the early 1970s, when she led the campaign against the Equal Rights Amendment through her Eagle Forum.
    [Show full text]
  • Nebraska's Rescission of the Proposed Equal Rights Amendment, 1972-1973
    THE DEVIL IS IN THE DETAILS: NEBRASKA'S RESCISSION OF THE PROPOSED EQUAL RIGHTS AMENDMENT, 1972-1973 Elizabeth F. Schnieder A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate College of Bowling Green State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS May 2010 Committee: Dr. Stephen R. Ortiz, Advisor Dr. Leigh Ann Wheeler © 2009 Elizabeth F. Schnieder All Rights Reserved iii ABSTRACT Dr. Stephen R. Ortiz, Advisor This thesis examines the role of a single state, Nebraska, in the lengthy and complex history of the proposed Equal Rights Amendment—specifically its impact during 1972 and 1973, the two crucial years when the amendment was passed by both the House of Representatives and the Senate and then went to the individual states for ratification. The core of this project centers on these fundamental issues: Nebraska’s unique single-house legislature and the rising New Right’s ability to take advantage of liberals’ disorganization in order to strengthen their own forces. Nebraska’s unicameral legislature, lacking the built-in checks-and-balances system inherent in bicameral legislatures, permitted propositions to be passed more quickly and reduced opportunities for in-depth debate. In 1972, Nebraska became the second state in the union to pass the ERA. In 1973, Nebraska rescinded its ERA vote just as quickly. This move would have significant impact on the actions of other states, and Nebraska would become a battleground in the struggle for power between liberal and conservative groups. Data collected and analyzed for this project came from a variety of sources, including books, articles, author interviews, newspapers, published reports, and archives.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 29 Ap® Focus & Annotated Chapter Outline
    CHAPTER 29 AP® FOCUS & ANNOTATED CHAPTER OUTLINE AP® FOCUS Period 9: 1980–Present AP U.S. History Key Concepts 9.1 Conservatism arose in politics and culture. • The growth of conservatism was fueled by religious fundamentalism and loss of faith in the government. • Conservative successes were hampered by enduring support for some government programs. 9.2 U.S. foreign policy was redefined after the Cold War. • The Reagan administration set the tone for future administrations with an interventionist foreign policy based on anticommunist principles. ANNOTATED CHAPTER OUTLINE The following annotated chapter outline will help you review the major topics covered in this chapter. I. The Rise of the New Right A. Barry Goldwater and Ronald Reagan: Champions of the Right 1. The Conscience of a Conservative a. Ronald Reagan embodies the story of New Right Republican conservatism. Although a New Deal Democrat and admirer of Roosevelt, as a taxpayer and staunch anticommunist he turned away from liberalism and joined the Republican Party. b. Reagan came to national prominence in 1964. Speaking to the Republican convention on national television, he delivered a powerful speech supporting the presidential nomination of archconservative Barry Goldwater. c. In his book, The Conscience of a Conservative, Goldwater agitated for an uncompromising conservatism of limited government and great personal freedom. d. Goldwater also suggested that previous Republican and Democratic administrations had not been determined enough to stop the spread of communism. 2. Grassroots Conservatives a. Goldwater’s rhetoric inspired a grassroots movement by conservative activists to make him the Republican Party’s nominee for president in 1964.
    [Show full text]
  • Republican Feminists and Feminist Republicans: the Es Arch for the Es Nsible Center in Michigan-1968 to 1984 Ann Marie Wambeke Wayne State University
    Wayne State University Wayne State University Dissertations 1-1-2017 Republican Feminists And Feminist Republicans: The eS arch For The eS nsible Center In Michigan-1968 To 1984 Ann Marie Wambeke Wayne State University, Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.wayne.edu/oa_dissertations Recommended Citation Wambeke, Ann Marie, "Republican Feminists And Feminist Republicans: The eS arch For The eS nsible Center In Michigan-1968 To 1984" (2017). Wayne State University Dissertations. 1752. https://digitalcommons.wayne.edu/oa_dissertations/1752 This Open Access Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@WayneState. It has been accepted for inclusion in Wayne State University Dissertations by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@WayneState. REPUBLICAN FEMINISTS AND FEMINIST REPUBLICANS: THE SEARCH FOR THE SENSIBLE CENTER IN MICHIGAN-1968 TO 1984 by ANN MARIE WAMBEKE DISSERTATION Submitted to the Graduate School of Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY 2017 MAJOR: HISTORY Approved By: Dr. Liette Gidlow Date Dr. Elizabeth Faue Date Dr. Tracy Neumann Date Dr. Krista Brumley Date DEDICATION I dedicate this dissertation to my two amazing grandsons, John Steven Mellen and Maxwell Ryle Bouton. My wish for both of you is that you develop a lifelong love of learning and a passion for the study of history. ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I could not have engaged in this long and wonderful journey without the support of others. To my friends and colleagues at Wayne State University. I would like you to know that you managed to make this entire process both intellectually rewarding and tremendously fun.
    [Show full text]