Synthèse Et Évaluation Pharmacologique D'analogues Préactivés De L'ifosfamide

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Synthèse Et Évaluation Pharmacologique D'analogues Préactivés De L'ifosfamide Synthèse et évaluation pharmacologique d’analogues préactivés de l’ifosfamide : prodrogues et nanoparticules à visée antitumorale Charles Skarbek To cite this version: Charles Skarbek. Synthèse et évaluation pharmacologique d’analogues préactivés de l’ifosfamide : prodrogues et nanoparticules à visée antitumorale. Pharmacie galénique. Université Paris Saclay (COmUE), 2017. Français. NNT : 2017SACLS247. tel-01618196 HAL Id: tel-01618196 https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-01618196 Submitted on 17 Oct 2017 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. 1 2 REMERCIEMENTS Je voudrais exprimer mes remerciements aux membres du jury, aux rapporteurs : les Maitres de Conférences Joseph Ciccolini et Sylvie Bégu, ainsi qu’aux examinateurs : les professeurs Elias Fattal, Thierry Martens et Nathalie Chaput ainsi que les docteurs Alain Herrera et Emilie Roger, d’avoir accepté de juger mon travail de thèse. Je souhaite remercier le Dr Lluis Mir, directeur de l’unité UMR CNRS 8203 pour m’avoir accueilli dans son laboratoire « vectorologie et thérapeutiques anticancéreuses » et de m’avoir permis de réaliser mes travaux de thèse après mon stage de Master 2, au cours desquels j’ai pu développer la formulation des dérivés préactivés de l’ifosfamide et réaliser leur évaluation pharmacologique. Je tiens à exprimer ma profonde gratitude au Pr Angelo Paci, mon directeur de thèse, pour m’avoir accueilli dans l’équipe « vectorologie chimique », pour m’avoir offert l’opportunité de travailler sur un projet de recherche scientifique intéressant et pour m’avoir guidé pendant ces années de thèse. Je le remercie de m’avoir transmis ses connaissances en pharmacologie avec pédagogie ainsi que pour m’avoir encouragé pour présenter mes travaux lors de plusieurs congrès internationaux. J’adresse mes remerciements au Pr Erwan Le Gall pour son accueil au sein de son équipe « électrochimie et synthèse organique » au sein de l’institut de chimie des matériaux Paris Est (UMR CNRS 7182) et de m’avoir permis de réaliser la synthèse des analogues préactivés de l’ifosfamide durant mon stage de master 2 et mes années de thèse. Je veux adresser un grand merci au Dr Michaël Rivard, maitre de conférences, pour m’avoir transmis tout son savoir dans le domaine de la chimie organique. Je le remercie pour sa grande disponibilité pendant mes expériences de laboratoire. Je le remercie aussi pour sa contribution lors de la rédaction de mon manuscrit. Je souhaite remercier le Pr Jean-Pierre Benoit ainsi que le Dr Emilie Roger pour leur collaboration et pour la mise en œuvre des travaux d’encapsulation de certains analogues préactivés de l’ifosfamide. Je voudrais aussi remercier le Pr Nathalie Chaput et les Dr Mélanie Desbois et Dr Sophie Viaud (Laboratoire d’Immunomonitoring en Oncologie, Gustave Roussy) qui m’ont permis d’acquérir une expérience en immunologie lors des travaux sur l’étude de l’effet immunomodulateur de l’ifosfamide. Je remercie aussi plus particulièrement Julia Delahousse qui a participé grandement à cette étude. Je remercie vivement Alain Deroussent, ingénieur de recherche, qui m’a apporté ses connaissances en chimie analytique et son expertise en spectrométrie de masse. Je le remercie aussi pour sa disponibilité lors de la correction et la rédaction de mes articles ainsi que de mon manuscrit. 3 J’exprime ma sincère gratitude à l’ensemble de mes collègues de l’équipe « électrochimie et synthèse organique » et plus particulièrement au Dr Anthony Olivier ainsi qu’à Patrice Renevret qui ont tous les deux participé à la réussite de mon projet de recherche. Je tiens à remercier le Dr Eric Le Cam, Catherine Durieu et Sonia Baconnais (UMR 8126) pour leur collaboration lors de la réalisation de l’étude des nanosystèmes par microscopie électronique à transmission. Je remercie aussi le Dr Jean-Rémi Bertrand ingénieur de recherche pour avoir obtenu l’analyseur des nanoparticules par diffusion de la lumière. Je remercie également l’équipe de la « plateforme d’évaluation préclinique » de Gustave Roussy, et plus particulièrement, le Dr Karine Ser Le Roux et Mélanie Polrot pour leur contribution à plusieurs études précliniques chez la souris. Je remercie tout particulièrement le Dr Estelle Daudigeos-Dubus, Léa Lesueur, Julia Delahousse, Ludivine Le Dret, Antoine Azan, Alexandre Plessier, Atmane Seck pour leur présence, leur écoute, leur aide au quotidien dans le déroulement de mon projet de recherche ainsi que pour leur participation à mon épanouissement au sein du laboratoire. Je remercie toutes les stagiaires (Aurore, Sandra, Valentine, Déborah, Naïma...) que j’ai pu encadrer lors de mon doctorat et qui ont participé à l’avancement de ce projet de recherche. Je remercie enfin l’ensemble de l’unité « vectorologie et thérapeutiques anticancéreuses » de Gustave Roussy pour l’ambiance cordiale au sein du laboratoire. 4 TABLE DES MATIERES REMERCIEMENTS .................................................................................................... 3 ABREVIATIONS ......................................................................................................... 9 LISTE DES ILLUSTRATIONS .................................................................................. 11 1 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................. 15 1.1 LES OXAZAPHOSPHORINES, AGENTS ALKYLANTS DE L’ADN .................................. 15 1.1.1 Historique du développement des agents alkylants ................................ 15 1.1.2 Mécanisme d’action des agents alkylants ............................................... 16 1.1.3 Généralités sur les oxazaphosphorines .................................................. 17 1.1.4 L’ifosfamide ............................................................................................. 18 1.2 LES NANOTECHNOLOGIES .................................................................................. 24 1.2.1 Généralités .............................................................................................. 24 1.2.2 Historique ................................................................................................ 25 1.2.3 Classification des nanomédecines .......................................................... 25 1.2.4 Classification selon leur composition ...................................................... 28 1.2.5 Utilisation des nanomédicaments en cancérologie ................................. 34 1.2.6 Caractérisation des nanomédicaments ................................................... 38 1.2.7 Propriétés des nanomédicaments ........................................................... 41 1.2.8 Mécanismes de ciblage .......................................................................... 45 1.2.9 La nanotoxicologie .................................................................................. 48 2 OBJECTIFS DES TRAVAUX DE THÈSE ............................................................ 53 3 ETAT DE L’ART ................................................................................................... 57 3.1 STRATÉGIES DE PHARMACOMODULATION ............................................................ 57 3.1.1 Modification du cycle oxazaphosphorine ................................................ 57 3.1.2 Modification des chaînes latérales .......................................................... 60 5 3.1.3 Modification de la moutarde alkylante ..................................................... 62 3.2 IMMUNITÉ ET CANCER ........................................................................................ 67 3.2.1 Généralités .............................................................................................. 67 3.2.2 L’immunoediting ...................................................................................... 70 3.2.3 Association chimiothérapie/immunothérapie ........................................... 72 3.2.4 Effet immunomodulateur des agents cytototoxiques ............................... 73 4 RESULTATS ........................................................................................................ 77 4.1 ANALOGUES D’IFOSFAMIDE PREACTIVES PERMETTANT LA LIBERATION DE LA MOUTARDE ISOPHOSPHORAMIDEE : SYNTHESE ET PREUVE DE CONCEPT ........................................ 77 4.1.1 Introduction de l’article ............................................................................ 77 4.1.2 Discussion de l’article ............................................................................. 80 4.2 ANALOGUES D’IFOSFAMIDE POLY-ISOPRENIQUES : AGENTS ANTITUMORAUX PREACTIVES SOUS LA FORME LIBRE OU NANOPARTICULAIRE ........................................................... 82 4.2.1 Introduction de l’article ............................................................................ 82 4.2.2 Discussion de l’article. ............................................................................ 95 4.3 ENCAPSULATION D’ANALOGUES PREACTIVES D’IFOSFAMIDE AU SEIN DE NANOCAPSULES LIPIDIQUES (NCLS). ................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Docetaxel Formulation in Polysorbate 80
    American Journal of Pharmacology & Therapeutics Research Article Docetaxel Formulation in Polysorbate 80: A Complex and Sensitive System - Jean-René Authelin1*, Doris Andert2, Lucile Boilait3, Jean-Jacques Nguyen-Huu1, Yan-Yan Zhang4 and Ping Ni1 1Sanofi R&D, 94400 Vitry sur Seine, France 2Sanofi Industrial Affairs, 65926 Frankfurt am Main, Germany 3Sanofi R&D, 34000 Montpellier, France 4Sanofi R&D, 200040 Shanghai, China *Address for Correspondence: Jean-René Authelin, Sanofi R&D, 94400 Vitry sur Seine, France, E-mail: Submitted: 21 September 2020; Approved: 25 September 2020; Published: 30 September 2020 Cite this article: Authelin JR, Andert D, Boilait L, Nguyen-Huu JJ, Zhang YY, Ni P. Docetaxel Formulation in Polysorbate 80: A Complex and Sensitive System. Am J Pharmacol Ther. 2020 Sep 30;4(1): 001-006. doi: 10.37871/ajpt.id19 Copyright: © 2020 Authelin JR, et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. American Journal of Pharmacology & Therapeutics ABSTRACT Background: Innovator docetaxel (in Taxotere reference product), a poorly water-soluble agent with a narrow therapeutic index, is developed as a solution in Polysorbate 80 and ethanol. Such formulations form metastable micelles and are considered complex parenterals. Formulation process control impacts quality attributes effi cacy and safety. Characterization of micellar systems in infusion bags is required to ensure good biopharmaceutical performance and equivalence of docetaxel generic formulation. Methods: HPLC, GC, water content (Karl Fischer) and pH were used to characterize chemical properties and oxygen content in the vial headspace.
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of Selected Polysorbate and Sucrose Ester Emulsifiers on the Physicochemical Properties of Astaxanthin Nanodispersions
    Molecules 2013, 18, 768-777; doi:10.3390/molecules18010768 OPEN ACCESS molecules ISSN 1420-3049 www.mdpi.com/journal/molecules Article Effects of Selected Polysorbate and Sucrose Ester Emulsifiers on the Physicochemical Properties of Astaxanthin Nanodispersions Navideh Anarjan 1,2 and Chin Ping Tan 1,* 1 Department of Food Technology, Faculty of Food Science and Technology, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 UPM Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia; E-Mail: [email protected] 2 Young Researchers and Elites Club, East Azarbaijan Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, 15655/461, Tabriz, Iran * Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: [email protected]; Tel.: +603-8946-8418; Fax: +603-8942-3552. Received: 7 December 2012; in revised form: 28 December2012 / Accepted: 31 December 2012 / Published: 9 January 2013 Abstract: The effects of selected nonionic emulsifiers on the physicochemical characteristics of astaxanthin nanodispersions produced by an emulsification/evaporation technique were studied. The emulsifiers used were polysorbates (Polysorbate 20, Polysorbate 40, Polysorbate 60 and Polysorbate 80) and sucrose esters of fatty acids (sucrose laurate, palmitate, stearate and oleate). The mean particle diameters of the nanodispersions ranged from 70 nm to 150 nm, depending on the emulsifier used. In the prepared nanodispersions, the astaxanthin particle diameter decreased with increasing emulsifier hydrophilicity and decreasing carbon number of the fatty acid in the emulsifier structure. Astaxanthin nanodispersions with the smallest particle diameters were produced with Polysorbate 20 and sucrose laurate among the polysorbates and the sucrose esters, respectively. We also found that the Polysorbate 80- and sucrose oleate-stabilized nanodispersions had the highest astaxanthin losses (i.e., the lowest astaxanthin contents in the final products) among the nanodispersions.
    [Show full text]
  • Polysorbate 80
    Pharmacopeial Forum Vol. 35(4) [July±Aug. 2009] STAGE 6 HARMONIZATION 1019 BRIEFING ASSAY • COMPOSITION OF FATTY ACIDS Diluent: 20 g/L sodium hydroxide in methanol Polysorbate 80. The European Pharmacopoeia is the coordi- Saturated sodium chloride solution: Sodium chloride and nating pharmacopeia for the international harmonization of the water (1:2). Before use, decant the solution from any undis- compendial standards for the Polysorbate 80 monograph, as solved substance and filter, if necessary. part of the process of international harmonization of Reference solution A: Prepare 0.50 g of the mixture of cali- monographs and general analytical methods of the European, brating substances with the composition described in Table 1. Japanese, and United States pharmacopeias. The following mon- Dissolve in heptane, and dilute with heptane to 50.0 mL. Reference solution B: Reference solution A in heptane (1 in ograph, which represents the ADOPTION STAGE 6 document, Stage 6 Harmonization is based on the corresponding monograph for Polysorbate 80 10) that was prepared by the European Pharmacopoeia and pub- Reference solution C: Prepare 0.50 g of a mixture of fatty lished in PF 33(5) [Sept.±Oct. 2007]. The European Pharmaco- acid methyl esters, which corresponds to the composition of poeia draft was based in part on comments from the Japanese the substance to be examined. Dissolve in heptane, and dilute Pharmacopoeia and the United States Pharmacopeia in response with heptane to 50.0 mL. [NOTEÐCommercially available mix- to the Provisional Harmonized Text Stage 5A and 5B drafts pre- tures of fatty acid methyl esters may also be used.] pared by the European Pharmacopoeia.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Patent (19) 11 Patent Number: 5,858,330 Boltri Et Al
    USOO585833OA United States Patent (19) 11 Patent Number: 5,858,330 Boltri et al. (45) Date of Patent: *Jan. 12, 1999 54). PHARMACEUTICAL FORMULATIONS IN 52 U.S. Cl. ............................ 424/45; 424/450; 424/484; FORM OF THIXOTROPIC GEL 424/401; 514/772 58 Field of Search ............................. 424/45, 450, 484; 75 Inventors: Luigi Boltri, Antonietta Coppola; 514/772 Marco Gentile; Gaetano Clavenna, all of Milan, Italy 56) References Cited 73) ASSignee: Dompe' S.p.A., L'Aquila, Italy U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS * Notice: This patent issued on a continued pros- 4,992.256 2/1991 Skaggs ...................................... 424/45 ecution application filed under 37 CFR 4,996,240 2/1991 Osipow et al.. 1.53(d), and is subject to the twenty year patent term provisions of 35 U.S.C. Primary Examiner Rebecca Cook 154(a)(2). Attorney, Agent, or Firm-Griffin, Butler, Whisenhunt & Szipl, LLP 22 Filed: Mar 18, 1996 The present invention relates to a topical formulation of 30 Foreign Application Priority Data gel-like consistency, but nebulizable by a mechanical pump, containing colloidal Silices as gelifying agent. Mar. 22, 1995 IT Italy ................................. MI95AO568 (51) Int. Cl. .................................................. A61L 9/04 9 Claims, No Drawings 5,858,330 1 2 PHARMACEUTICAL FORMULATIONS IN Surface area from 50 to 400 m/g FORM OF THXOTROPIC GEL Average diameter from 7 to 40 nm. All of these materials give Similar gelification phenomena The present invention relates to a topical formulation of but, Since gelification occurs through adsorption, the Surface gel-like consistency, but nebulizable by mechanical pump, area characteristics become paramount for the choice of the containing colloidal Silices as gelifying agent.
    [Show full text]
  • The Effects of Polysorbate 80 on the Fat Emulsion in Ice Cream Mix: Evidence from Transmission Electron Microscopy Studies
    Food Structure Volume 6 Number 2 Article 11 1987 The Effects of Polysorbate 80 on the Fat Emulsion in Ice Cream Mix: Evidence from Transmission Electron Microscopy Studies H. D. Goff M. Liboff W. K. Jordan J. E. Kinsella Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/foodmicrostructure Part of the Food Science Commons Recommended Citation Goff, H. D.; Liboff, M.; Jordan, W. K.; and Kinsella, J. E. (1987) "The Effects of Polysorbate 80 on the Fat Emulsion in Ice Cream Mix: Evidence from Transmission Electron Microscopy Studies," Food Structure: Vol. 6 : No. 2 , Article 11. Available at: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/foodmicrostructure/vol6/iss2/11 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Western Dairy Center at DigitalCommons@USU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Food Structure by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@USU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. FOOD MICROSTRUCTURE, VoL 6 (1987), pp. 193- 198 0730-54 19/87$3 . 00+- . 00 Scanning Microscopy International , Chicago (AMF O'Hare). IL 60666 USA THE EFFECTS OF POLYSORBATE 80 ON THE FAT EMULSION IN ICE CREAM MIX EVIDENCE FROM TRANSMISSION ELECTRON MICROSCOPY STUDIES H. D. Goff", M. Uboff, W. K. Jordan, and J. E. Kinsella Institute of Food Science, Stocking Hall Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853 Introduction Emulsifiers are used in ice cream to produce a dry, smooth Emulsifiers, such as mono- and di -glycerides or textured product with desirable melting properties. They function polyoxyethylene sorbitan esters, are used in ice cream to improve by promoting a partial destabilization of the fat emulsion.
    [Show full text]
  • An Efficient UV-Based Method for the Assessment of Oleic Acid Content in Biotherapeutic Drug Products Containing Polysorbate-80 Robert E
    [ APPLICATION NOTE ] An Efficient UV-Based Method for the Assessment of Oleic Acid Content in Biotherapeutic Drug Products Containing Polysorbate-80 Robert E. Birdsall and Ying Qing Yu Waters Corporation, Milford, MA, USA APPLICATION BENEFITS INTRODUCTION ■■ A robust and sensitive method in the Surfactants such as polyoxyethylene sorbitan monooleate (PS-80) are analysis of PS-80 degradants commonly used in formulated biopharmaceuticals to reduce protein denaturing, aggregation, and surface adsorption to vials and syringes.1 ■■ UV-based workflow that enables rapid deployment in regulated environments While PS-80 plays a critical role in stabilizing drug products, degradation of surfactants in formulated drugs can decrease overall product efficacy ■■ Minimal sample preparation with ability and safety. To this end, characterization, identification, and quantitation to perform high throughput analysis of excipients such as PS-80 must be performed to demonstrate the drug product is safe and efficacious in its formulated state. Due to its non-volatile and UV-inactive nature, direct analysis of PS-80 has resulted in methods that incorporate alternative detection techniques such as evaporative light scattering detection (ELSD).2 Yet, given the ubiquitous nature of UV-based instruments in pharmaceutical labs, methods that can utilize existing equipment would be beneficial. Conveniently, the degradation of PS-80 through radical autoxidation or enzymatic processes results in the cleavage of the hydrophobic ester tail (Figure 1) to produce the UV-active fatty acid, oleic acid.1,3,4 Various extraction techniques of fatty acids from biological matrices have resulted in assays that range in degree of sample preparation required, sensitivity, and reproducibility.3-5 UV-based methods that are robust, sensitive, and can be readily deployed in regulated environments are highly valuable in ensuring product quality and safety.
    [Show full text]
  • Polysorbate 80
    Stage 6 Harmonization Official May 1, 2016 Polysorbate 1 . Table 1 (Continued) Polysorbate 80 Mixture of the Following Composition Portions of the monograph text that are national USP text, Substances (%) and are not part of the harmonized text, are marked Methyl oleate 20 N with symbols ( .N) to specify this fact. Methyl eicosenoate 10 Sorbitan, mono-9-octadecenoate, poly(oxy-1,2-ethanediyl) Methyl behenate 10 derivs., (Z)-; Methyl lignocerate 10 Polyoxyethylene 20 sorbitan monooleate [9005-65-6]. Chromatographic system DEFINITION (See Chromatography 〈621〉, System Suitability.) Polysorbate 80 is a mixture of partial esters of fatty acids, Mode: GC mainly oleic acid, with sorbitol and its anhydrides ethox- Detector: Flame ionization ylated with approximately 20 moles of ethylene oxide for Column: 0.32-mm × 30-m G16 on fused silica; film each mole of sorbitol and sorbitol anhydrides. thickness 0.5 µm Temperatures IDENTIFICATION Injection port: 250° • A. It meets the requirements of the test for Composition Detector: 250° of Fatty Acids. Column: See Table 2. Change to read: Table 2 Hold Time LN LN • . .LNF34B. INFRARED ABSORPTION 〈197F〉 . .LNF34 Initial Tempera- Final at Final Tempera- ture Tempera- Tempera- ASSAY ture Ramp ture ture (°) (°/min) (°) (min) Change to read: 80 10 220 Ð 220 Ð 220 40 • COMPOSITION OF FATTY ACIDS Diluent: 20 g/L of sodium hydroxide in methanol Carrier gas: Helium L .Boron trifluoride±methanol solution: 140 g/L of bo- Linear velocity: 50 cm/s ron trifluoride in methanolLNF34 Injection volume: 1 µL Saturated sodium chloride solution: Sodium chloride System suitability and water (1:2). Before use, decant the solution from Samples: Reference solution A and Reference solution B any undissolved substance and filter, if necessary.
    [Show full text]
  • 2B Excipient Monographs for Injection
    USP Excipient Stakeholder Forum, September 29th 2016 Chinese Manufacturer’s Perspective on Excipient Monograph Specifications for Polysorbate 80 used for Injection LOGO Design of the polysorbate 80 for injection 南京威尔化工有限公司 Nanjing Well Chemical Co.,Ltd Ya Wang About Well Chemical 01 Specialized manufacturer of pharmaceutical excipients in China. All the excipients of Well Chemical have been 02 approved by CFDA. For polysorbate 80, we have pharma grade and for 03 injection grade. Introduction of Polysorbate 80 Definition:Polysorbate 80 is a mixture of partial esters of fatty acids,mainly oleic acid, with sorbitol and its anhydrides ethoxylated with approximately 20 moles of ethylene oxide for each mole of sorbitol and sorbitol anhydrides.(USP-39, NF34) Structure: hydrophilic group lipophilic group Introduction of Polysorbate 80 Actual composition: polysorbate 80 polyoxyethylene(12)isosorbide polyoxyethylene(12)isosorbide monooleate polyoxyethylene(12)isosorbide dioleate polyoxyethylene(24)sorbitan polyoxyethylene(24)sorbitan monooleate polyoxyethylene(24) sorbitan dioleate polyoxyethylene(24)sorbitan trioleate polyoxyethylene(24)sorbitan tetraoleate and so on…………………… Introduction of Polysorbate 80 Widely used in many formulations; Solubilizer-injection, oral solution, topical lotions Emulsifier-ointment, cream, gel Dispersing agent-biological product Introduction of Polysorbate 80 Polysorbate 80 is added as solubilizer in dozens of injections and the proportion ranges from 0.1% to 50%; Typical formulation EPO injection Vitamin k1 injection
    [Show full text]
  • The Effects of Polysorbate-80 and Lecithin on Stable Frozen Dessert
    THE EFFECTS OF POLYSORBATE-80 AND LECITHIN ON STABLE FROZEN DESSERT Linda Chang, Matthew Gerber, Esther Hur, Alyssa Jaakobs, Ginger Jiang, Neeraja Konuthula, Allison Murawski, Jeny Nirappil, Nischay Rege, Christina Sarris, Evelyn Tong, Tian Xia Advisor: Rachel Sandler Assistant: Danielle Cusmano ABSTRACT The texture and richness of an ice cream are wholly dependent on the precise combination of its ingredients. This experiment aimed to determine the effects of various concentrations of two emulsifiers: lecithin and polysorbate-80, and to determine if they had a synergistic effect. It was hypothesized that a 70% polysorbate-80 and 30% lecithin ratio would best meet the desired qualities. After conducting sensory evaluations, it was determined that in the low fat ice cream, the emulsifiers had negligible effect on the taste of the final product. In the light ice cream, the 70% polysorbate-80 and 30% lecithin trial had the best texture and richness. In the regular ice cream, the emulsifier negatively impacted the taste of the sample. INTRODUCTION Food science is the scientific discipline that involves all aspects of food development and production. The study of food science begins with the harvesting of ingredients and ends with the consumption of a food product by the consumer. Food scientists formulate and package food products, study of shelf-life of products, conduct sensory evaluation, and have chemical testing of products. Food science has many connections to other scientific disciplines, including microbiology, chemistry, biochemistry, and chemical engineering. Thus, food scientists require an understanding of the fundamental chemical, biological, and physical properties of each of the materials they work with in order to ensure that they can manufacture a microbiologically safe and chemically shelf stable product for mass consumption [1].
    [Show full text]
  • Productinformation Sigma Prod
    POLYOXYETHYLENE SORBITAN MONOOLEATE ProductInformation Sigma Prod. Nos. P1754, P8074, P0567, and P8466 CAS NUMBER: 9005-65-6 SYNONYMS: Tween 80R 1; polyoxyethylene sorbitol ester; polysorbate 80; PEG (20) sorbitan monooleate PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION:2 HO(C H O) (OC H ) OH Appearance: viscous liquid, 2 4 w 2 4 x clear yellow, sometimes with greenish cast Molecular formula: C H O 3 64 124 26 O CH(OC H ) OH Molecular weight: 13103 2 4 y Specific gravity: 1.07 at 25°C H C (OC2H4) OC (CH2)7 (CH2)7 CH3 z CC HLB value: 15.04 H O H Critical micellar concentration (CMC): 13-15 mg/L4,5 H Viscosity: 400-620 cps at 25°C sum of w, x, y, z = 20 STABILITY / STABILITY AS SUPPLIED: The product is stable for years at room temperature, if protected from oxidation. Over time, particularly at high temperatures, any ether linkage is subject to oxidation to form peroxides. This should be re-evaluated for continued suitability in user application every three to five years. SOLUBILITY / SOLUTION STABILITY: Tween 80 dissolves at 1 mL in 10 mL water to give a clear to slightly hazy faint yellow solution. A 1% solution has pH 5.5-7.2.6 It is reported to be soluble in alcohol, cottonseed oil, corn oil, ethyl acetate, methanol and toluene, but insoluble in mineral oil.3 Solutions are reasonably stable at 2-8°C for short periods. Solutions and the neat liquid may undergo autoxidation over time.7 The product is not sterile. Autoclaving of solutions is generally not advised.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of Chromatography A, 1599 (2019) 136–143
    Journal of Chromatography A, 1599 (2019) 136–143 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Journal of Chromatography A jo urnal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/chroma Development of a design of experiments optimized method for quantification of polysorbate 80 based on oleic acid using UHPLC-MS a,b,c,∗ b,c a,d Julia Puschmann , Dirk-H. Evers , Christel C. Müller-Goymann , b,c Michael E. Herbig a Institut für Pharmazeutische Technologie, TU Braunschweig, Braunschweig, Germany b Almirall Hermal GmbH, Reinbek, Germany c RaDes GmbH, Hamburg, Germany d Center of Pharmaceutical Engineering (PVZ), TU Braunschweig, Braunschweig, Germany a r a t i c l e i n f o b s t r a c t Article history: The aim was to develop a straightforward UHPLC-MS quantification method for polysorbate 80 using Received 24 December 2018 oleic acid as surrogate marker, which was the commonest substance within the emulsifier. However, Received in revised form 2 April 2019 hydrolysis of polysorbate 80 and subsequent analysis of fatty acids revealed a co-elution of oleic acid Accepted 7 April 2019 and an isomer while all the other fatty acids were successfully separated by varying retention times Available online 8 April 2019 and mass-to-charge ratios. For identification and separation of the isomer a derivatization method was evaluated. Oxidation to the corresponding dihydroxystearic acids with potassium permanganate resulted Keywords: in peak separation of cis/trans and structural isomers of the 18:1 fatty acids. Hydrolyzed and derivatized Polysorbate 80 2 polysorbate 80 was quantified indirectly in the range of 0.046–5.83 ␮g/mL (R > 0.997) with a limit of Design of experiments Quantification detection of 11.4 ng/mL.
    [Show full text]
  • Polysorbates 20, 60, 65 and 80)
    Original: Japanese Provisional translation Evaluation Report of Food Additives Polysorbates (Polysorbates 20, 60, 65 and 80) June 2007 Food Safety Commission Contents History of deliberation.......................................................................................................1 Members of the Food Safety Commission.........................................................................1 Expert members of the Expert Committee on Food Additives, Food Safety Commission.…………1 Evaluation results on the Health Risk Assessment of Polysorbate 20, Polysorbate 60, Polysorbate 65 and Polysorbate 80 as food additives...................................................................................................2 Summary.............................................................................................................................................. 2 1. Introduction...................................................................................................................................... 3 2. Background...................................................................................................................................... 3 3. Outline of the designation of food additives.................................................................................... 3 4. Name, etc. ........................................................................................................................................ 3 (1) Polysorbate 20 ......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]