Phylogenetic Analysis of Hydrophiloidea Based on Characters of the Head of Adults and Larvae (Staphyliniformia)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Phylogenetic Analysis of Hydrophiloidea Based on Characters of the Head of Adults and Larvae (Staphyliniformia) ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Koleopterologische Rundschau Jahr/Year: 1994 Band/Volume: 64_1994 Autor(en)/Author(s): Beutel Rolf Georg Artikel/Article: Phylogenetic analysis of Hydrophiloidea based on characters of the head of adults and larvae (Staphyliniformia). 103-131 ©Wiener Coleopterologenverein (WCV), download unter www.biologiezentrum.at Koleopterologische Rundschau 64 103 - 131 Wien, Juni 1994 Phylogenetic analysis of Hydrophiloidea based on characters of the head of adults and larvae (Coleoptera: Staphyliniformia) R.G. BEUTEL Abstract Characters of the head of adults and larvae of Hydrophiloidea (sensu CROWSON 1955) are analyzed phylogenetically. The monophyly of the superfamily is strongly suggested by autapomorphies of adults such as palpicorn antenna, antenna! groove, postocular emargination, complex hypopharyngeal Suspensorium, distal galeomere composed by fimbriate lamellae, large, quadrangular mental plate, and others. First instar larvae of Hydrophiloidea possess cephalic egg bursters as a common derived feature. Hydrophiloidea (excl. Hydraenidae) share two autapomorphies of adults and five larval synapomorphies such as the loss of the clypeolabral and frontoclypeal sutures, and the insertion of the galea on palpomere I. Hydrophiloidea (excl. Hydraenidae and Spercheidae) are characterized by one autapomorphy of adults and 5 larval autapomorphies such as prognathism, strongly reduced intra- maxillary moveability, subdivided cardo, partly reduced maxillary fossa, and rudimentary lacinia. The transformation of the broad gula into a median gular suture, contiguous posterior tentorial grooves which are distant from the foramen occipitale, and the presence of a nasal projection and conspicuous triangular adnasalia are significant larval synapomorphies of Helophoridae, Epimetopidae, Georissidae, and Hydrophilidae. Helophoridae are the sistergroup of Georissidae, Epimetopidae, and Hydrophilidae. A separate, cranial submental sclerite is a possible synapomorphy of the latter families. Hydrophilidae are characterized by hyperprognathism, a V-shaped submental suture, complete reduction of the maxillary groove, and dorsal insertion of the antennae. The presence òf a pronotai shield which covers parts of the dorsal wall of the head capsule of adults, a strongly deflexed head, cuticular spines along the mesal edges of the larval adnasalia, and an elongated palpomere I with a minute galea are possible synapomorphies of Epimetopidae and Georissidae. Key words: Hydrophiloidea, head structures, adults, larvae, phylogenetic analysis Introduction The concept of the superfamily Hydrophiloidea or Palpicornia was subject to several changes during its taxonomic history. BÖVING & CRAIGHEAD (1931) included Histeridae, but excluded Hydraenidae in their synopsis of the larval forms of Coleoptera. Both families, Hydraenidae and Histeridae, were included in Palpicornia in another larval study by EMDEN (1942). Hydrophiloidea (or Palpicornia) include Hydraenidae, Spercheidae, Hydrochidae, Georissidae, and Hydrophilidae (incl. Helophorinae) in a system proposed by D'ORCHYMONT (1916, 1919) and by CROWSON (1955). Histeroidea are considered as members of Hydrophiloidea, whereas Hydraenidae are transferred to Staphylinoidea, close to Ptiliidae in several recent studies (DYBAS 1976; LAWRENCE 1982; COSTA et al. 1988). Hydrophiloidea include the families Helophoridae, Epimetopidae, Georissidae, Hydrochidae, Spercheidae, and Hydrophilidae in a comprehensive work by HANSEN (1991a). A sistergroup relationship between those groups and Histeroidea is considered as more likely than a sistergroup relationship between Hydrophiloidea (sensu HANSEN 1991a) and Hydraenidae. The present study of characters of the head of larvae and adults is considered as a contribution towards a clarification of the monophyly or paraphyly of Hydrophiloidea (sensu CROWSON 1955) and of the interrelationships of the hydrophiloid subgroups. Emphasis is placed upon a detailed ©Wiener Coleopterologenverein (WCV), download unter www.biologiezentrum.at 104 Koleopt. Rdsch. 64 (1994) discussion of the characters presented. It is well understood that a "final solution" of these questions requires an analyis of a broader set of characters than presented in this paper, even though the head is the most complex structure of an insect body. Detailed study of more structural features (especially internal characters) of adult and larval Staphyliniformia and a phylogenetic evaluation of those data should be the purport of future studies. Material and methods Selected larvae and newly hatched adults were imbedded in Histoplast S for microtome sections (5 /xm). The sections were stained with haemalaun. Drawings were made using an ocular grid. Scanning electron microscopy was accomplished after specimens were cleaned with ultra sound, dried (critical point method) and coated with gold-palladium (Cambridge Stereoscan Mk 2). The determination of the polarity of character states is based on the outgroup and ingroup comparison method described by WATROUS & WHEELER (1981). The outgroup includes Staphylinoidea and other Polyphaga, Adephaga, Myxophaga, and Cupedidae. Character states found in representatives of these groups and subgroups of Hydrophiloidea are considered plesiomorphic. The corresponding character states in other subgroups of Hydrophiloidea as apomorphic. Only synapomorphic i.e. common derived character states are criteria for phylogenetic relationship. Information on several groups discussed in this context, especially larval Staphylinoidea (e.g. Ptiliidae, Leiodidae, Leptinidae) are taken from the literature (e.g. DYBAS 1976; LAWRENCE 1982; STEHR 1991). Muscular nomenclature and corresponding numbers used in the illustrations are according to KELER (1963). Plesiomorphic character states = 0; apomorphic character states in a transformation series = 1, 2; alternative apomorphic character states = 1*; reversal = 0,5R (partial), OR (total). List of species examined: Hydraenidae: adults: Orchymontia spinipennis BRAUN, Prosthetops WATERHOUSE sp., Gymnochthebius chilenus (J.BALFOUR-BROWNE), Meropathus campbellensis BROOKES, Ochthebius melanescens DALLA TORRE, Hydraena britteni JOY, Limnebius crassipes KUWERT, L. papposus MULSANT Spercheidae: adults: Spercheus emarginatus (SCHALLER); larvae: Spercheus emarginatiti (SCHALLER) Hydrochidae: adults: Hydrochus angustatus GERMAR Georissidae: adults: Georissus crenulatus (ROSSI) Helophorinae: adults: Helophorus aquaticus (L.), Helophorus minutus FABRICIUS; larvae: Helophorus FABRICIUS ssp. Hydrophilinae: adults: Coelostoma orbiculare (FABRICIUS), Sphaeridium bipustulatum FABRICIUS, Cercyon impressiti (STURM), Hydrobius fuscipes (L.), Anacaena globulus (PAYKULL), A. limbata (FABRICIUS), Laccobius minutus (L.), Helochares obscurus (MÜLLER), Enochrus bicolor (FABRICIUS), E. testaceus (FABRICIUS), E. qffinis THUNBERG, Hydrochara caraboides (L.), Hydrophilus piceus (L.), H. aterrimus ESCHSCHOLTZ, Berosus signaticollis (CHARPENTIER); larvae: Sphaeridium bipustulatum FABRICIUS, Enochrus THOMSON sp., Hydrobius LEACH sp., Hydrophilus LEACH sp., Sperchopsis tesselata (ZŒGLER), Berosus LEACH sp. Histeridae: adults: Margarinotus cadaverinus (HOFFMANN); larvae: Saprinus semistriatus (SCRIBA), Paralister BlCKHARDT sp., Histeridae ssp. Silphidae: adults: Oeceoptoma thoracica (L.), Silpha obscura L., Necrophorus vespillo (L.); larvae: Silpha L. sp. Ptiliidae: Acrotrichis MOTSCHULSKY sp. Leiodidae: adults: Catops PAYKULL sp.; larvae: Catops sp. Scydmaenidae: Cephennium MÜLLER et KUNZE sp., Neuraphes THOMSON sp. Staphylinidae: adults: Philonthus decorus (GRAVENHORST), Ocypus olens (MÜLLER); larvae: Philonthus CURTIS sp. Leptinidae: adults: Platypsyllus castoris RITSEMA Hydroscaphidae: larvae: Hydroscapha LECONTE sp. ©Wiener Coleopterologenverein (WCV), download unter www.biologiezentrum.at BEUTEL: Phylogenetic analysis of Hydrophiloidea (STAPHYLINIFORMIA) 105 Cupedidae: adults: Priacma serrata LECONTE Abbreviations and muscular nomenclature used in Figs. 1-36: 7 M. labroepipharyngalis gu gula 8 M. frontolabralis gur gular ridge 11 M. craniomandibularis intemus gus gular suture 12 M. craniomandibularis externus hy hypopharynx 15 M. craniocardinalis lbr labrum 17 M. tentoriocardinalis lc lacinia 18 M. tent.-stipitalis md mandible 19 M. craniolacinialis mo mola 41 M. frontohypopharyngalis mst mediostipes 42 M. tent.-hypopharyngalis mt mentum 43 M. clypeopalatalis nas nasale 44 M. clypeobuccalis Pf palpifer 45 M. frontobucc. anterior pguscl pregular sclerite 46 M. frontobucc. posterior ph pharynx pi palpus labialis adnas adnas ale pml palpomere I amgupl anteromedian gular plate pmt prementum ant antenna pmtr premental retractors antm antennal muscles pmx palpus maxillaris ata anterior tentorial arm poem postocular emargination bst basistipes Ptg posterior tentorial groove c cardo ret retinaculum ce compound eye rm ring muscle cly clypeus sap sensorial appendage esci cervical sclerite smt submentum dta dorsal tentorial arm soes suboesophageal ganglion eph epipharynx st stipes fcls frontoclypeal suture ste stemmata fm fossa maxillaris sus anterior hypopharyngeal Suspensorium fs frontal suture tb tentorial bridge ga galea y-s Y-shaped suture gf ganglion frontale Character analysis (Table I) I. Autapomorphies of Hydrophiloidea (sensu CROWSON 1955) Adult features 1. Head protruding (1.0)/ head strongly retracted, transverse posterodorsal ridge present (1.1)
Recommended publications
  • Beetle Appreciation Diversity and Classification of Common Beetle Families Christopher E
    Beetle Appreciation Diversity and Classification of Common Beetle Families Christopher E. Carlton Louisiana State Arthropod Museum Coleoptera Families Everyone Should Know (Checklist) Suborder Adephaga Suborder Polyphaga, cont. •Carabidae Superfamily Scarabaeoidea •Dytiscidae •Lucanidae •Gyrinidae •Passalidae Suborder Polyphaga •Scarabaeidae Superfamily Staphylinoidea Superfamily Buprestoidea •Ptiliidae •Buprestidae •Silphidae Superfamily Byrroidea •Staphylinidae •Heteroceridae Superfamily Hydrophiloidea •Dryopidae •Hydrophilidae •Elmidae •Histeridae Superfamily Elateroidea •Elateridae Coleoptera Families Everyone Should Know (Checklist, cont.) Suborder Polyphaga, cont. Suborder Polyphaga, cont. Superfamily Cantharoidea Superfamily Cucujoidea •Lycidae •Nitidulidae •Cantharidae •Silvanidae •Lampyridae •Cucujidae Superfamily Bostrichoidea •Erotylidae •Dermestidae •Coccinellidae Bostrichidae Superfamily Tenebrionoidea •Anobiidae •Tenebrionidae Superfamily Cleroidea •Mordellidae •Cleridae •Meloidae •Anthicidae Coleoptera Families Everyone Should Know (Checklist, cont.) Suborder Polyphaga, cont. Superfamily Chrysomeloidea •Chrysomelidae •Cerambycidae Superfamily Curculionoidea •Brentidae •Curculionidae Total: 35 families of 131 in the U.S. Suborder Adephaga Family Carabidae “Ground and Tiger Beetles” Terrestrial predators or herbivores (few). 2600 N. A. spp. Suborder Adephaga Family Dytiscidae “Predacious diving beetles” Adults and larvae aquatic predators. 500 N. A. spp. Suborder Adephaga Family Gyrindae “Whirligig beetles” Aquatic, on water
    [Show full text]
  • Thorne Moors :A Palaeoecological Study of A
    T...o"..e MO<J "S " "",Ae Oe COlOOIC'" S T<.OY OF A e"ONZE AGE slTE - .. "c euc~ , A"O a • n ,• THORNE MOORS :A PALAEOECOLOGICAL STUDY OF A BRONZE AGE SITE A contribution to the history of the British Insect fauna P.c. Buckland, Department of Geography, University of Birmingham. © Authors Copyright ISBN ~o. 0 7044 0359 5 List of Contents Page Introduction 3 Previous research 6 The archaeological evidence 10 The geological sequence 19 The samples 22 Table 1 : Insect remains from Thorne Moors 25 Environmental interpretation 41 Table 2 : Thorne Moors : Trackway site - pollen and spores from sediments beneath peat and from basal peat sample 42 Table 3 Tho~ne Moors Plants indicated by the insect record 51 Table 4 Thorne Moors pollen from upper four samples in Sphagnum peat (to current cutting surface) 64 Discussion : the flooding mechanism 65 The insect fauna : notes on particular species 73 Discussion : man, climate and the British insect fauna 134 Acknowledgements 156 Bibliography 157 List of Figures Frontispiece Pelta grossum from pupal chamber in small birch, Thorne Moors (1972). Age of specimen c. 2,500 B.P. 1. The Humberhead Levels, showing Thorne and Hatfield Moors and the principal rivers. 2 2. Thorne Moors the surface before peat extraction (1975). 5 3. Thorne Moors the same locality after peat cutting (1975). 5 4. Thorne Moors location of sites examined. 9 5. Thorne Moors plan of trackway (1972). 12 6. Thorne Moors trackway timbers exposed in new dyke section (1972) • 15 7. Thorne Moors the trackway and peat succession (1977).
    [Show full text]
  • First Record of a Minute Mud-Loving Beetle of the Family Georissidae (Insecta: Coleoptera: Hydrophiloidea) in Thailand
    NAT. HIST. BULL. SIAM SOC. 61(2): 131–133, 2016 First Record of a Minute Mud-loving Beetle of the Family Georissidae (Insecta: Coleoptera: Hydrophiloidea) in Thailand William D. Shepard1 and Robert W. Sites2* The family Georissidae (minute mud-loving beetles) is represented by a single genus, Georissus, which occurs on all continents except Antarctica. However, country records of species of Georissus are scattered. The genus comprises three subgenera (Georissus [Georissus], Georissus [Neogeorissus], and Georissus [Nipponogeorissus]), 80 species, and 2 subspecies (+$16(1/,729.,1 ),.Éÿ(. 2011). Various authors have considered the family as a subfamily within Hydrophilidae; however, current opinion retains family status (6+257 ),.Éÿ(. 2013). Larval, pupal, and adult Georissus are found on damp, sandy shores of lakes and rivers (SHEPARD, 6RPHDGXOWVFDPRXÁDJHWKHPVHOYHVZLWKDFRYHULQJ of sand grains glued to their dorsum (BAMEUL, 1989). Most descriptions of adults are of the external morphology and only a few included a description or illustration of the aedeagus. Larvae have been described by VAN EMDEN (1956), BERTRAND (1972), SPANGLER (1991) and $5&+$1*(/6.< (1997); pupae have been described by BERTRAND (1972) and SHEPARD (2003). The chromosomal karyotype of Georissus crenulatus (Rossi) has been described and illustrated by SHAARAWI & ANGUS (1992), and the life cycle of Georissus californicus LeConte) has been described by SHEPARD (2003). This family is little known because of their small size (many less than 2 mm) and the adults of some taxa conceal themselves with sand and remain still upon disturbance. Although most species are described from a limited number of adults, if a collector takes the time to closely examine sandy shores, the adults can be found.
    [Show full text]
  • An Annotated Checklist of Wisconsin Handsome Fungus Beetles (Coleoptera: Endomychidae)
    The Great Lakes Entomologist Volume 40 Numbers 3 & 4 - Fall/Winter 2007 Numbers 3 & Article 9 4 - Fall/Winter 2007 October 2007 An Annotated Checklist of Wisconsin Handsome Fungus Beetles (Coleoptera: Endomychidae) Michele B. Price University of Wisconsin Daniel K. Young University of Wisconsin Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/tgle Part of the Entomology Commons Recommended Citation Price, Michele B. and Young, Daniel K. 2007. "An Annotated Checklist of Wisconsin Handsome Fungus Beetles (Coleoptera: Endomychidae)," The Great Lakes Entomologist, vol 40 (2) Available at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/tgle/vol40/iss2/9 This Peer-Review Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Biology at ValpoScholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Great Lakes Entomologist by an authorized administrator of ValpoScholar. For more information, please contact a ValpoScholar staff member at [email protected]. Price and Young: An Annotated Checklist of Wisconsin Handsome Fungus Beetles (Cole 2007 THE GREAT LAKES ENTOMOLOGIST 177 AN Annotated Checklist of Wisconsin Handsome Fungus Beetles (Coleoptera: Endomychidae) Michele B. Price1 and Daniel K. Young1 ABSTRACT The first comprehensive survey of Wisconsin Endomychidae was initiated in 1998. Throughout Wisconsin sampling sites were selected based on habitat type and sampling history. Wisconsin endomychids were hand collected from fungi and under tree bark; successful trapping methods included cantharidin- baited pitfall traps, flight intercept traps, and Lindgren funnel traps. Examina- tion of literature records, museum and private collections, and field research yielded 10 species, three of which are new state records. Two dubious records, Epipocus unicolor Horn and Stenotarsus hispidus (Herbst), could not be con- firmed.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Beetles
    Ireland Red List No. 1 Water beetles Ireland Red List No. 1: Water beetles G.N. Foster1, B.H. Nelson2 & Á. O Connor3 1 3 Eglinton Terrace, Ayr KA7 1JJ 2 Department of Natural Sciences, National Museums Northern Ireland 3 National Parks & Wildlife Service, Department of Environment, Heritage & Local Government Citation: Foster, G. N., Nelson, B. H. & O Connor, Á. (2009) Ireland Red List No. 1 – Water beetles. National Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of Environment, Heritage and Local Government, Dublin, Ireland. Cover images from top: Dryops similaris (© Roy Anderson); Gyrinus urinator, Hygrotus decoratus, Berosus signaticollis & Platambus maculatus (all © Jonty Denton) Ireland Red List Series Editors: N. Kingston & F. Marnell © National Parks and Wildlife Service 2009 ISSN 2009‐2016 Red list of Irish Water beetles 2009 ____________________________ CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .................................................................................................................................... 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY...................................................................................................................................... 2 INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................................................ 3 NOMENCLATURE AND THE IRISH CHECKLIST................................................................................................ 3 COVERAGE .......................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • An Annotated Checklist of Wisconsin Mordellidae (Coleoptera)
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Center for Systematic Entomology, Gainesville, Insecta Mundi Florida September 2003 An annotated checklist of Wisconsin Mordellidae (Coleoptera) Anneke E. Lisberg University of Wisconsin-Madison Daniel K. Young University of Wisconsin-Madison Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/insectamundi Part of the Entomology Commons Lisberg, Anneke E. and Young, Daniel K., "An annotated checklist of Wisconsin Mordellidae (Coleoptera)" (2003). Insecta Mundi. 39. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/insectamundi/39 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Center for Systematic Entomology, Gainesville, Florida at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Insecta Mundi by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. INSECTA MUNDI, Vol. 17, No. 3-4, September-December, 2003 195 An annotated checklist of Wisconsin Mordellidae (Coleoptera) Anneke E. Lisberg and Daniel K. Young Department of Entomology University of Wisconsin-Madison 445 Russell Labs 1630 Linden Dr. Madison, WI 53706, U.S.A. Abstract: A three-year survey of Wisconsin Mordellidae (Coleoptera) encompassing a compilation of data from literature records and local collections as well as field work including trapping, hand-collecting, and rearing yielded 68 species comprising 14 genera in three tribes. Sixty-three species (92% of Wisconsin fauna) represent new state species records, not previously recorded from the state in the literature. Plant-associations and state- specific temporal and spatial distribution data for larvae and adults are noted as available. Distributional records suggest 16 additional species and one additional genus are likely to occur in Wisconsin.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Genus and Species of Asiocoleidae (Coleoptera) From
    ISRAEL JOURNAL OF ENTOMOLOGY, Vol. 50 (2), pp. 1–9 (21 July 2020) This contribution is published to honor Prof. Vladimir Chikatunov, a scientist, a colleague and a friend, on the occasion of his 80th birthday. The first finding of an asiocoleid beetle (Coleoptera: Asiocoleidae) in the Upper Permian Belmont Insect Beds, Australia, with descriptions of a new genus and species Aleksandr G. Ponomarenko1, Evgeny V. Yan1, Olesya D. Strelnikova1 & Robert G. Beattie2 1A.A. Borissiak Palaeontological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Profsoyuznaya ul. 123, Moscow, 117997 Russia. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] 2The Australian Museum, 1 William Street, Sydney, New South Wales, 2010 Australia. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] ABSTRACT A new genus and species of Archostematan beetles, Gondvanocoleus chikatunovi n. gen. & sp., is described from an isolated elytron from the Upper Permian Belmont locality in Australia. Gondvanocoleus n. gen. differs from other members of the family Asiocoleidae in having only one row of cells in the middle part of the elytral field 3 and in having unorganized cells not forming rows near the elytral apex. Further relationships of the new genus with other asiocoleids are discussed. The fossil record of the Asiocoleidae is briefly overviewed. KEYWORDS: Coleoptera, Archostemata, Asiocoleidae, beetles, new genus, new species, Permian, Lopingian, Australia, Gondwana, fossil record. РЕЗЮМЕ Новый род и вид жуков-архостемат, Gondvanocoleus chikatunovi n. gen. & sp., описаны по изолированному надкрылью из верхнепермского мес то­ нахождения Бельмонт в Австралии. Gondvanocoleus n. gen. отличается от остальных родов семейства Asiocoleidae присутствием только одного ряда ячей в средней части предшовного поля и не организованных в ряды ячей в апикальной части надкрылья.
    [Show full text]
  • ACTA ENTOMOLOGICA 59(1): 253–272 MUSEI NATIONALIS PRAGAE Doi: 10.2478/Aemnp-2019-0021
    2019 ACTA ENTOMOLOGICA 59(1): 253–272 MUSEI NATIONALIS PRAGAE doi: 10.2478/aemnp-2019-0021 ISSN 1804-6487 (online) – 0374-1036 (print) www.aemnp.eu RESEARCH PAPER Aquatic Coleoptera of North Oman, with description of new species of Hydraenidae and Hydrophilidae Ignacio RIBERA1), Carles HERNANDO2) & Alexandra CIESLAK1) 1) Institute of Evolutionary Biology (CSIC-Universitat Pompeu Fabra), Passeig Maritim de la Barceloneta 37, E-08003 Barcelona, Spain; e-mails: [email protected], [email protected] 2) P.O. box 118, E-08911 Badalona, Catalonia, Spain; e-mail: [email protected] Accepted: Abstract. We report the aquatic Coleoptera (families Dryopidae, Dytiscidae, Georissidae, 10th June 2019 Gyrinidae, Heteroceridae, Hydraenidae, Hydrophilidae and Limnichidae) from North Oman, Published online: mostly based on the captures of fourteen localities sampled by the authors in 2010. Four 24th June 2019 species are described as new, all from the Al Hajar mountains, three in family Hydraenidae, Hydraena (Hydraena) naja sp. nov., Ochthebius (Ochthebius) alhajarensis sp. nov. (O. punc- tatus species group) and O. (O.) bernard sp. nov. (O. metallescens species group); and one in family Hydrophilidae, Agraphydrus elongatus sp. nov. Three of the recorded species are new to the Arabian Peninsula, Hydroglyphus farquharensis (Scott, 1912) (Dytiscidae), Hydraena (Hydraenopsis) quadricollis Wollaston, 1864 (Hydraenidae) and Enochrus (Lumetus) cf. quadrinotatus (Guillebeau, 1896) (Hydrophilidae). Ten species already known from the Arabian Peninsula are newly recorded from Oman: Cybister tripunctatus lateralis (Fabricius, 1798) (Dytiscidae), Hydraena (Hydraena) gattolliati Jäch & Delgado, 2010, Ochthebius (Ochthebius) monseti Jä ch & Delgado 2010, Ochthebius (Ochthebius) wurayah Jäch & Delgado, 2010 (all Hydraenidae), Georissus (Neogeorissus) chameleo Fikáč ek & Trávní č ek, 2009 (Georissidae), Enochrus (Methydrus) cf.
    [Show full text]
  • An Annotated Checklist of Wisconsin Scarabaeoidea (Coleoptera)
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Center for Systematic Entomology, Gainesville, Insecta Mundi Florida March 2002 An annotated checklist of Wisconsin Scarabaeoidea (Coleoptera) Nadine A. Kriska University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI Daniel K. Young University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/insectamundi Part of the Entomology Commons Kriska, Nadine A. and Young, Daniel K., "An annotated checklist of Wisconsin Scarabaeoidea (Coleoptera)" (2002). Insecta Mundi. 537. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/insectamundi/537 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Center for Systematic Entomology, Gainesville, Florida at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Insecta Mundi by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. INSECTA MUNDI, Vol. 16, No. 1-3, March-September, 2002 3 1 An annotated checklist of Wisconsin Scarabaeoidea (Coleoptera) Nadine L. Kriska and Daniel K. Young Department of Entomology 445 Russell Labs University of Wisconsin-Madison Madison, WI 53706 Abstract. A survey of Wisconsin Scarabaeoidea (Coleoptera) conducted from literature searches, collection inventories, and three years of field work (1997-1999), yielded 177 species representing nine families, two of which, Ochodaeidae and Ceratocanthidae, represent new state family records. Fifty-six species (32% of the Wisconsin fauna) represent new state species records, having not previously been recorded from the state. Literature and collection distributional records suggest the potential for at least 33 additional species to occur in Wisconsin. Introduction however, most of Wisconsin's scarabaeoid species diversity, life histories, and distributions were vir- The superfamily Scarabaeoidea is a large, di- tually unknown.
    [Show full text]
  • Studies of the Laboulbeniomycetes: Diversity, Evolution, and Patterns of Speciation
    Studies of the Laboulbeniomycetes: Diversity, Evolution, and Patterns of Speciation The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:40049989 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA ! STUDIES OF THE LABOULBENIOMYCETES: DIVERSITY, EVOLUTION, AND PATTERNS OF SPECIATION A dissertation presented by DANNY HAELEWATERS to THE DEPARTMENT OF ORGANISMIC AND EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the subject of Biology HARVARD UNIVERSITY Cambridge, Massachusetts April 2018 ! ! © 2018 – Danny Haelewaters All rights reserved. ! ! Dissertation Advisor: Professor Donald H. Pfister Danny Haelewaters STUDIES OF THE LABOULBENIOMYCETES: DIVERSITY, EVOLUTION, AND PATTERNS OF SPECIATION ABSTRACT CHAPTER 1: Laboulbeniales is one of the most morphologically and ecologically distinct orders of Ascomycota. These microscopic fungi are characterized by an ectoparasitic lifestyle on arthropods, determinate growth, lack of asexual state, high species richness and intractability to culture. DNA extraction and PCR amplification have proven difficult for multiple reasons. DNA isolation techniques and commercially available kits are tested enabling efficient and rapid genetic analysis of Laboulbeniales fungi. Success rates for the different techniques on different taxa are presented and discussed in the light of difficulties with micromanipulation, preservation techniques and negative results. CHAPTER 2: The class Laboulbeniomycetes comprises biotrophic parasites associated with arthropods and fungi.
    [Show full text]
  • The Beetle Fauna of Dominica, Lesser Antilles (Insecta: Coleoptera): Diversity and Distribution
    INSECTA MUNDI, Vol. 20, No. 3-4, September-December, 2006 165 The beetle fauna of Dominica, Lesser Antilles (Insecta: Coleoptera): Diversity and distribution Stewart B. Peck Department of Biology, Carleton University, 1125 Colonel By Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K1S 5B6, Canada stewart_peck@carleton. ca Abstract. The beetle fauna of the island of Dominica is summarized. It is presently known to contain 269 genera, and 361 species (in 42 families), of which 347 are named at a species level. Of these, 62 species are endemic to the island. The other naturally occurring species number 262, and another 23 species are of such wide distribution that they have probably been accidentally introduced and distributed, at least in part, by human activities. Undoubtedly, the actual numbers of species on Dominica are many times higher than now reported. This highlights the poor level of knowledge of the beetles of Dominica and the Lesser Antilles in general. Of the species known to occur elsewhere, the largest numbers are shared with neighboring Guadeloupe (201), and then with South America (126), Puerto Rico (113), Cuba (107), and Mexico-Central America (108). The Antillean island chain probably represents the main avenue of natural overwater dispersal via intermediate stepping-stone islands. The distributional patterns of the species shared with Dominica and elsewhere in the Caribbean suggest stages in a dynamic taxon cycle of species origin, range expansion, distribution contraction, and re-speciation. Introduction windward (eastern) side (with an average of 250 mm of rain annually). Rainfall is heavy and varies season- The islands of the West Indies are increasingly ally, with the dry season from mid-January to mid- recognized as a hotspot for species biodiversity June and the rainy season from mid-June to mid- (Myers et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Four New Records to the Rove-Beetle Fauna of Portugal (Coleoptera, Staphylinidae)
    Boletín Sociedad Entomológica Aragonesa, n1 39 (2006) : 397−399. FOUR NEW RECORDS TO THE ROVE-BEETLE FAUNA OF PORTUGAL (COLEOPTERA, STAPHYLINIDAE) Pedro Martins da Silva1*, Israel de Faria e Silva1, Mário Boieiro1, Carlos A. S. Aguiar1 & Artur R. M. Serrano1,2 1 Centro de Biologia Ambiental, Faculdade de Ciências da Universidade de Lisboa, R. Ernesto de Vasconcelos, Ed. C2-2ºPiso, Campo Grande, 1749-016 Lisboa. 2 Departamento de Biologia Animal da Faculdade de Ciências da Universidade de Lisboa, R. Ernesto de Vasconcelos, Ed. C2- 2ºPiso, Campo Grande, 1749-016 Lisboa. * Corresponding author: [email protected] Abstract: In the present work, four rove beetle records - Ischnosoma longicorne (Mäklin, 1847), Thinobius (Thinobius) sp., Hesperus rufipennis (Gravenhorst, 1802) and Quedius cobosi Coiffait, 1964 - are reported for the first time to Portugal. The ge- nus Thinobius Kiesenwetter is new for Portugal and Hesperus Fauvel is recorded for the first time from the Iberian Peninsula. The distribution of Quedius cobosi Coiffait, an Iberian endemic, is now extended to Western Portugal. All specimens were sam- pled in cork oak woodlands, in two different localities – Alcochete and Grândola - using two distinct sampling techniques. Key word: Coleoptera, Staphylinidae, New records, Iberian Peninsula, Portugal. Resumo: No presente trabalho são apresentados quatro registos novos de coleópteros estafilinídeos para Portugal - Ischno- soma longicorne (Mäklin, 1847), Thinobius (Thinobius) sp., Hesperus rufipennis (Gravenhorst, 1802) e Quedius cobosi Coiffait, 1964. O género Hesperus Fauvel é registado pela primeira vez para a Península Ibérica e o género Thinobius Kiesenwetter é novidade para Portugal. A distribuição conhecida de Quedius cobosi Coiffait, um endemismo ibérico, é também ampliada para o oeste de Portugal.
    [Show full text]