DOCSLIB.ORG

The Radical Reformation the Radical Reformation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Radical Reformation the Radical Reformation The Radical Reformation The Radical Reformation CH508 LESSON 08 of 24 Waldshut: Hubmaier and Politics Abraham Friesen, PhD Experience: Professor Emeritus of History, University of California, Santa Barbara This is lecture 8. The topic is Waldshut and Hubmaier. Balthasar Hubmaier, a student of Dr. John Eck at the University of Ingolstadt, Luther’s most famous Catholic opponent, received a doctorate of theology at the University of Ingolstadt. An effective administrator and preacher, he became pro-rector of the University of Ingolstadt in 1515, and then pastor and chaplain at the Regensburg Cathedral. In 1521 he became priest in the town of Waldshut, which, though close to the Swiss border, was in Austrian-Habsburg territory. This factor will become very important later on. By 1522 Hubmaier began to study Luther’s writings. He sought out friends of the Reformation and began a study of the Pauline Epistles. Then he received a call to return to the Regensburg Cathedral. He did so, staying only one year, however; because his religious convictions were undergoing changes, and so he returned to Waldshut. Now he came increasingly under Zwingli’s influence. He entered into correspondence with him, in particular discussing New Testament passages dealing with baptism. It is quite likely, as we shall see later, that these passages centered on Matthew 28:19 and 20. In other words, they centered on the Great Commission, for he later cites this passage in connection with Erasmus and in virtually every other writing on baptism. Zwingli, who had himself been heavily influenced by Erasmian Christian humanism after 1515, and who undoubtedly knew of Erasmus’s annotations on the baptismal passages, according to Hubmaier, agreed that “children should not be baptized before they are instructed in the faith.” Hubmaier attended the second Zurich disputation in October 26–28, 1523, where the Catholic Mass and the images were discussed. At the close of that disputation, Zwingli had turned the implementation of the reforms over to my lords of the city council. Simon Stumpf, however, objected, saying that the Holy Spirit had already decided the issue and that it had now to be Transcript - CH508 The Radical Reformation 1 of 8 © 2019 Our Daily Bread University. All rights reserved. Lesson 08 of 24 Waldshut: Hubmaier and Politics acted upon. Upon his return to Waldshut from Zurich in the fall of 1523, Hubmaier began to implement his reforms. The populace was already on his side, if not, in fact, all the clergy. He delivered his “18 Articles Concerning the Christian Faith,” abolished the laws on fasting and celibacy, and married—all with the tacit approval of the town council. But Waldshut was not autonomous, like the free imperial cities of the empire, which owed allegiance only to the emperor Charles V, who was absent from Germany in Spain between 1521 and 1530. Waldshut’s political overlord was Charles’s brother Ferdinand, the archduke of Austria and a very staunch Catholic indeed. Sometime between Hubmaier’s return from Zurich in early November of 1523 and December 11, 1523, the government—that is, the Catholic government at Innsbruck—must have written to the Waldshut authorities demanding that Hubmaier reverse his reforms and that he should do so on the basis of the Nuremberg Imperial Edict of March 6, 1523. This edict—and we shall have to enter into a fairly substantial discussion of it here—has been ignored in its impact on the Reformation. I have completed all of the research on it and have commenced writing a book about it. It is an edict that depends largely on the political context for its interpretation, and it is the result of Frederick the Wise’s own attempt to find a solution for the problem of Luther in his territory. We cannot go into the background of the edict here, but it was formulated by a counselor to Frederick the Wise. It was formulated in the imperial governing council, the executive branch of the imperial government of Germany, in the summer of 1523 Frederick’s representative on the council was aided by one of Germany’s best legal minds at the time, a man by the name of Hans von Schwarzenberg, who was all but Lutheran by this time. Reflecting Frederick’s desire to allow Luther to continue preaching the gospel but worried about imperial intervention if changes were to be made in the church services, his representatives drew up the law, which reads in part as follows. And this is the critical passage that we want to keep in mind: “That every elector, prince, prelate, count, and other estate in the realm shall, with all due diligence, so order and decree that all preachers in his territory are justly and equitably advised to avoid everything that might lead to disobedience, dissension, and revolt in the Holy Empire, or that might cause Christians to be led astray in their faith. Instead, Transcript - CH508 The Radical Reformation 2 of 8 © 2019 Our Daily Bread University. All rights reserved. Lesson 08 of 24 Waldshut: Hubmaier and Politics they are to preach and teach only the Holy Gospel and that in accordance with the interpretation of the Scriptures as approved by the Holy Christian Church.” There are clearly two separate aspects to this edict. On the one hand, there are to be no innovations made in the church’s liturgy, in the church’s services, or any other changes in it. Clearly, this was what Frederick had feared most when Karlstadt had held his evangelical Mass on Christmas Day, 1521, because it would have given the imperial government an excuse to intervene in what he considered his internal political affairs. The second aspect had to do with preaching only the gospel. One would nearly call this a Lutheran tenet and the aspect that Frederick wanted protected the most, but the edict added the clause “according to the interpretation approved by the Holy Christian Church.” In the original draft had been written in specific names of such teachers approved by the Christian church. The names listed were those of Augustine, of Saint Jerome, Saint Ambrose, Saint Cyprian, and other of the great church fathers. But Catholics on the council had objected. The best teachers of the Christian church, they insisted, were the latest ones—teachers like Thomas Aquinas, William of Auken, Duns Scotus, Gabriel Biel, et cetera— in other words, the scholastic theologians of the High Middle Ages. Clearly, the argument reflected differences of opinion between Reformers and Catholics as to who the best teachers of the Christian church were. In this case, Luther and Melanchthon had adopted the Christian humanist position that one should go back to the Bible, the purest source of Christianity, and to those interpreters who stood in closest in time to the Bible. But in the council the two sides reached a stalemate, and so it was decided to delete the specific names and simply to say “as approved by the Christian church.” This compromise did not resolve the issue. It merely allowed both sides to interpret this part of the edict in diametrically opposing ways, and it transferred the quarrel from the smaller confines of the imperial governing council to the broader confines of the empire at large. Had we the time, one could show in detail how Catholics interpreted the edict in one way and Protestants interpreted it in quite another. The political context in which this confrontation took place was absolutely critical to the outcome. So sometime between November 1, 1523, and December 11 of the same year, the Catholic Austrian government wrote to the Waldshut mayor and council arguing that Hubmaier was preaching a heretical Transcript - CH508 The Radical Reformation 3 of 8 © 2019 Our Daily Bread University. All rights reserved. Lesson 08 of 24 Waldshut: Hubmaier and Politics version of the gospel and was introducing innovations clearly condemned by this particular edict. On December 11, 1523, the mayor and town council of Waldshut wrote to the Austrian authorities at Innsbruck defending Hubmaier against these accusations. The specific accusations were the following. First, that Hubmaier had “interpreted the holy gospel differently than it actually was.” And this, the Austrians said, had angered the people of Waldshut and their neighbors. The second accusation was that he had introduced unheard-of innovations into the church services. To these charges, the mayor and town council answered as follows. First, they said that they had always published all imperial mandates, and this last one (the one of March 6, 1523) had been read from the pulpits of their churches by two secular priests from Constance. Second, they said, Hubmaier had not preached anything contrary to the gospel, nor would they have tolerated him preaching against the imperial edict. Rather, they were seeking to enforce it. Third, as far as they could tell, Hubmaier was interpreting the gospel from the pulpit as it actually was. His intention was, as he stated openly from the pulpit, to preach “the pure and clear gospel from here on out, which he has done according to our understanding. We even invited the dean and priests to see if he preached anything but the clear and pure Word of God.” If the Austrian authorities wished, the mayor and town council continued, they could act in compliance with the edict and send several theologians from the Bishop of Constance to check Hubmaier out themselves. If these authorities could prove Hubmaier’s interpretation of the Gospels to be wrong, the latter would surely back down; but this was difficult to do, as Catholics had learned by this time, and so nothing was done.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Protestant and Catholic Medicine in the Sixteenth Century? the Case of Ingolstadt Anatomy
    Medical History, 2001, 45: 83-96 Protestant and Catholic Medicine in the Sixteenth Century? The Case of Ingolstadt Anatomy JURGEN HELM* There is an ongoing debate about the relation between religious confession and sixteenth-century medicine. Although it is generally agreed that Richard Toellner's statement "In Wittenberg the Reformation does not affect the medical faculty", which closes a paper published in 1984,' cannot be maintained in this apodictic formulation, recent research still discusses how and to what extent confessional matters might have influenced sixteenth-century medical thinking. Interest has focused in particular on the "anatomical Renaissance", as Andrew Cunningham's book is entitled,2 which reviewed the works of Andreas Vesalius (1514-1564) and several sixteenth-century anatomists as well as the dissemination of their ideas celebrated by generations ofmedical historians as the beginning ofmodem anatomical research. In his paper on 'Wittenberg anatomy' Vivian Nutton showed in 1994 that a special view of anatomical knowledge was taken at Wittenberg University.3 According to Nutton, Wittenberg anatomy must be considered as an "education process in which a variety of messages was transmitted" to the students.4 Here, at the Leucorea, the heart of Lutheran Reformation, anatomy was focused on its theological implications: it dealt particularly with the links between the body and the Christian soul and hence affected Christian morality. Furthermore, anatomy, the disclosure of the wonderful structure of the human body, was most suitable for demonstrating the Creator's skill in designing nature. Philipp Melanchthon's (1497-1560) Commentarius Jiurgen Helm, Dr med., Martin-Luther- in A Buck (ed.), Renaissance Reformation.
    [Show full text]
  • Reformation Roots Edited by John B
    THE LIVING THEOLOGICAL HERITAGE OF THE UNITED CHURCH OF CHRIST Barbara Brown Zikmund Series Editor L T H VOLUME TWO Reformation Roots Edited by John B. Payne The Pilgrim Press Cleveland, Ohio Contents The Living Theological Heritage of the United Church of Christ ix Reformation Roots 1 Part L Late Medieval and Renaissance Piety and Theology 37 1. The Book of the Craft of Dying (c. mid-15th century) 37 2. The Imitation of Christ (c. 1427) 51 THOMAS À KEMPIS 3. Eternal Predestination and Its Execution in Time (1517) 69 JOHN VON STAUPITZ 4.Paraclesis(1516) 86 DESIDERIUS ERASMUS Part II. Reformation in Germany, Switzerland, and the 98 Netherlands Martin Luther and the German Reformation 5. The Freedom of a Christian (1520) 98 MARTIN LUTHER 6. Formula of Mass and Communion for the Church 121 at Wittenberg (1523) MARTIN LUTHER 7. Hymn: Out of the Depths I Cry to Thee (1523) 137 MARTIN LUTHER 8. Small Catechism (1529) 140 MARTIN LUTHER 9. The Augsburg Confession (1530) 160 Zwingli and the Swiss Reformation 10. Sixty-Seven Articles (1523) 196 ULRICH ZWINGLI 11. Action or Use of the Lord's Supper (1525) 205 ULRICH ZWINGLI 12. The Schleitheim Confession of Faith (1527) 214 13. The Marburg Colloquy (1529) 224 VI • CONTENTS 14. Sermon One, Decade One: Of the Word of God 248 from Decades (1549-51) HEINRICH BULLINGER Calvin and the Genevan Reformation 15. The Law from Institution of the Christian Religion (1536) 266 JOHN CALVIN 16. The Geneva Confession (1536) 272 WILLIAM FAREL AND JOHN CALVIN 17. The Strasbourg Liturgy (1539) 280 MARTIN BUCER 18.
    [Show full text]
  • The Artistic Patronage of Albrecht V and the Creation of Catholic Identity in Sixteenth
    The Artistic Patronage of Albrecht V and the Creation of Catholic Identity in Sixteenth- Century Bavaria A dissertation presented to the faculty of the College of Fine Arts of Ohio University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy Adam R. Gustafson June 2011 © 2011 Adam R. Gustafson All Rights Reserved 2 This dissertation titled The Artistic Patronage of Albrecht V and the Creation of Catholic Identity in Sixteenth- Century Bavaria by ADAM R. GUSTAFSON has been approved for the School of Interdisciplinary Arts and the College of Fine Arts _______________________________________________ Dora Wilson Professor of Music _______________________________________________ Charles A. McWeeny Dean, College of Fine Arts 3 ABSTRACT GUSTAFSON, ADAM R., Ph.D., June 2011, Interdisciplinary Arts The Artistic Patronage of Albrecht V and the Creation of Catholic Identity in Sixteenth- Century Bavaria Director of Dissertation: Dora Wilson Drawing from a number of artistic media, this dissertation is an interdisciplinary approach for understanding how artworks created under the patronage of Albrecht V were used to shape Catholic identity in Bavaria during the establishment of confessional boundaries in late sixteenth-century Europe. This study presents a methodological framework for understanding early modern patronage in which the arts are necessarily viewed as interconnected, and patronage is understood as a complex and often contradictory process that involved all elements of society. First, this study examines the legacy of arts patronage that Albrecht V inherited from his Wittelsbach predecessors and developed during his reign, from 1550-1579. Albrecht V‟s patronage is then divided into three areas: northern princely humanism, traditional religion and sociological propaganda.
    [Show full text]
  • Illuminati Conspiracy Part One: a Precise Exegesis on the Available Evidence
    http://www.conspiracyarchive.com/NWO/Illuminati.htm Illuminati Conspiracy Part One: A Precise Exegesis on the Available Evidence - by Terry Melanson, Aug. 5th, 2005 Illuminati Conspiracy Part Two: Sniffing out Jesuits A Metaprogrammer at the Door of Chapel Perilous In the literature that concerns the Illuminati relentless speculation abounds. No other secret society in recent history - with the exception of Freemasonry - has generated as much legend, hysteria, and disinformation. I first became aware of the the Illuminati about 14 years ago. Shortly thereafter I read a book, written by Robert Anton Wilson, called Cosmic Trigger: Final Secret of the Illuminati. Wilson published it in 1977 but his opening remarks on the subject still ring true today: Briefly, the background of the Bavarian Illuminati puzzle is this. On May 1, 1776, in Bavaria, Dr. Adam Weishaupt, a professor of Canon Law at Ingolstadt University and a former Jesuit, formed a secret society called the Order of the Illuminati within the existing Masonic lodges of Germany. Since Masonry is itself a secret society, the Illuminati was a secret society within a secret society, a mystery inside a mystery, so to say. In 1785 the Illuminati were suppressed by the Bavarian government for allegedly plotting to overthrow all the kings in Europe and the Pope to boot. This much is generally agreed upon by all historians. 1 Everything else is a matter of heated, and sometimes fetid, controversy. It has been claimed that Dr. Weishaupt was an atheist, a Cabalistic magician, a rationalist, a mystic; a democrat, a socialist, an anarchist, a fascist; a Machiavellian amoralist, an alchemist, a totalitarian and an "enthusiastic philanthropist." (The last was the verdict of Thomas Jefferson, by the way.) The Illuminati have also been credited with managing the French and American revolutions behind the scenes, taking over the world, being the brains behind Communism, continuing underground up to the 1970s, secretly worshipping the Devil, and mopery with intent to gawk.
    [Show full text]
  • C:\Data\WP\F\191\191 Internet.Wpd
    Jonathan A. Hill, Bookseller, Inc. 325 West End Avenue, Apt. 10B New York City, New York, 10023-8145 Tel: 646 827-0724 Fax: 212 496-9182 E-mail: [email protected] Catalogue 191 Proofs Science, Medicine, Natural History, & Bibliography Selective Subject Index on Following Pages 2 JONATHAN A. HILL Selective Subject Index Acoustics: 87 Aeronautics: 63 Agriculture: 39, 52, 73 Alchemy: 16, 18 Americana: 31 Anatomy: 14, 69, 89 Architecture: 41, 43 Art: 14, 41, 63 Astrology: 79 Astronomy: 54, 68, 75, 79, 82, 86, 90 Auction Catalogues: 6-15, 34 Balneology: 20 Bibliography: 4, 6-15, 19, 23, 26, 34, 37, 38, 42, 44, 45, 56, 73, 93, 94 Biography: 82 Biology: 95, 100 Botany: 31, 39, 69, 70, 73 Bridges: 74 Calculus: 33 Canals: 43 Cancer: 2 Cardiology: 69 Cartography: 46 Catalogues: 4, 6-15, 19, 38, 44, 56, 93, 94 Ceramics: 52, 81 Chemistry: 16-18, 20-22, 41, 47, 49, 51-53, 57-63, 65, 68, 75, 80, 81, 83-85, 97, 98 Coins & Medals: 14, 91 Color Theory: 70, 72 Crystallography: 50, 71, 88 Dentistry: 92 Dibner items: 29, 50, 63, 99 Dictionaries: 51 Dyeing & Bleaching: 52, 53, 75, 81, 83, 97, 98 Early Printed Books (before 1601): 3, 5, 32, 35, 45, 55, 64, 79, 80, 86 Electricity & Magnetism: 40, 63, 75 Embryology: 69, 95, 100 En Français dans le Texte items: 29, 50, 78 Engineering: 41, 74, 96, 99 CATALOGUE ONE HUNDRED & NINETY– ONE 3 Forests: 31, 52 Galileo: 5 Gardens: 39 Garrison-Morton items: 2, 24, 69, 89, 92 Gastronomy: 52, 85 Gems: 14 Geography: 68 Geology: 3, 30, 60, 66, 67, 88 Geometry: 48, 68 Glass: 52, 81 History: 20, 26 Hoover items: 3, 30, 59,
    [Show full text]
  • Jedidiah Morse, the Bavarian Illuminati and the Refashioning of the Jeremiad Tradition in New England
    University of New Hampshire University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository Master's Theses and Capstones Student Scholarship Spring 2008 Watchmen of the New Jerusalem: Jedidiah Morse, the Bavarian Illuminati and the refashioning of the jeremiad tradition in New England Rachel A. Snell University of New Hampshire, Durham Follow this and additional works at: https://scholars.unh.edu/thesis Recommended Citation Snell, Rachel A., "Watchmen of the New Jerusalem: Jedidiah Morse, the Bavarian Illuminati and the refashioning of the jeremiad tradition in New England" (2008). Master's Theses and Capstones. 81. https://scholars.unh.edu/thesis/81 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Scholarship at University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses and Capstones by an authorized administrator of University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. WATCHMEN OF THE NEW JERUSALEM: JEDJDJAH MORSE, THE BAVARIAN ILLUMINATI AND THE REFASHIONING OF THE JEREMIAD TRADITION IN NEW ENGLAND BY RACHEL A. SNELL BA, University of Maine, 2006 THESIS Submitted to the University of New Hampshire in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in History May, 2008 UMI Number: 1455014 INFORMATION TO USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleed-through, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted.
    [Show full text]
  • Beachy on Müller-Seidel and Riedel, 'Die Weimarer Klassik Und Ihre Geheimbünde'
    H-German Beachy on Müller-Seidel and Riedel, 'Die Weimarer Klassik und ihre Geheimbünde' Review published on Saturday, April 1, 2006 Walter Müller-Seidel, Wolfgang Riedel. Die Weimarer Klassik und ihre Geheimbünde. Würzburg: Verlag Königshausen & Neumann, 2003. 206 S. EUR 25.00 (paper), ISBN 978-3-8260-2528-0. Reviewed by Robert Beachy (Department of History and Historic Preservation, Goucher College) Published on H-German (April, 2006) Secret Societies and Weimar Classicism Conspiracy theories and secret societies remain a topic of perennial fascination. The international bestseller, The Da Vinci Code, offers one of the more recent examples of this phenomenon. The world of German classical letters and its relationship to secret societies offers another illustration and it serves as the general topic of this essay collection. Delivered as lectures to the Munich Goethe- Gesellschaft in 1998-99, the volume has a narrower focus than that suggested by its title. All the chapters treat the German Illuminati, a secret society founded in 1776, and its relationship to late- eighteenth-century Weimar. Founded by the 28-year-old professor of canon law Adam Friedrich Weishaupt at the Bavarian University of Ingolstadt, the Illuminati were banned within less than a decade by the Bavarian Elector Duke Karl Theodor. But by 1785, when Weishaupt was forced to flee to the Thuringian principality of Saxe-Gotha, he and his closest associates had recruited a small but powerful group of German ruling princes, state bureaucrats, academics and aristocrats--including the Weimar Duke Carl August and his officials Goethe, Wieland and Herder. After 1789, the Illuminati became fodder for a broad myth that purported to explain the American and French revolutions, as well as any number of modern political conspiracies.
    [Show full text]
  • Winners and Losers from the Protestant Reformation: an Analysis of the Network of European Universities
    WINNERS AND LOSERS FROM THE PROTESTANT REFORMATION: AN ANALYSIS OF THE NETWORK OF EUROPEAN UNIVERSITIES David de la Croix, Pauline Morault DISCUSSION PAPER | 2020 / 29 Winners and Losers from the Protestant Reformation: An Analysis of the Network of European Universities* David de la Croix Pauline Morault October 22, 2020 Abstract Using a new database of European academics, we provide a global view of the effect of the Protestant Reformation on the network of universities and on their individual importance within the network. A connection (edge) between two uni- versities (nodes) is defined by the presence of the same scholar in both universities. We first show that the emergence of Protestantism is strongly associated with ris- ing fragmentation. Dyadic regressions confirm that geography is important as well, but does not substitute for the effect of religion. Considering eigenvector central- ity as a measure of the importance of nodes in the network, we find that becoming Protestant or being a newly founded Protestant university is associated with higher centrality. Finally, the number of publications from universities is strongly corre- lated with centrality, lending credence to the view that the loss of connectedness of the Southern European universities after the (Counter-)Reformation was key in triggering their scientific demise. Keywords: Upper-Tail Human Capital, Universities, Network, Centrality, Publica- tions, Fragmentation. JEL Classification Numbers: N33, O15, I25. *We acknowledges the financial support of the project ARC 15/19-063 of the Belgian French-speaking Community. We thank Sascha Becker, Alice Fabre, Marc Go~ni,and Gonzague Vannoorenberghe for discussions on the paper. IRES/LIDAM, UCLouvain, B-1348, Belgium & CEPR, London.
    [Show full text]
  • Did Sixteenth-Century Lutheran Women Have a Reformation?
    Did Sixteenth-century Lutheran Women Have a Reformation? Joy A. Schroeder Professor of Church History Trinity Lutheran Seminary at Capital University n 2017, Christians throughout the world commemorated the 500-year anniversary of the beginning of the Reformation. In elly-Gadol] challenged prevailing the wake of these commemorations, an essay about women of [ Ithe Lutheran reformation seems fitting for aFestschrift honoring Kconceptualizations of historical Professor Walter Taylor. During the nineteen years I have known periodization, observing that the impact him as a faculty colleague and friend, I have appreciated the ways he has been a consistent advocate for the fair and just treatment of of historical events and movements was women students, staff, and faculty in the seminary and the wider church. Furthermore, he is an accomplished scholar, outstanding often very different for women than it teacher, and faithful preacher of the gospel. I offer this essay with was for men. thanksgiving for Walter Taylor’s service. Did Lutheran women have a reformation? Women in German-speaking territories had opportunities to listen In 1977, historian Joan Kelly-Gadol published her groundbreak- to—and, in some cases, read for themselves—scripture translated by ing article, “Did Women Have a Renaissance?” She challenged Luther directly from Hebrew and Greek rather than the medieval prevailing conceptualizations of historical periodization, observing German Bibles that were translations of the Latin Vulgate. Indeed, that the impact of historical events
    [Show full text]
  • Land Enclosure and Bavarian State Centralization (1779-1835)
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 7-1-2020 Reshaping an Earthly Paradise: Land Enclosure and Bavarian State Centralization (1779-1835) Gregory DeVoe Tomlinson Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations Part of the European History Commons, and the Social History Commons Recommended Citation Tomlinson, Gregory DeVoe, "Reshaping an Earthly Paradise: Land Enclosure and Bavarian State Centralization (1779-1835)" (2020). LSU Doctoral Dissertations. 5308. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations/5308 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please [email protected]. RESHAPING AN EARTHLY PARADISE: LAND ENCLOSURE AND BAVARIAN STATE CENTRALIZATION (1779-1835) A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The Department of History by Gregory DeVoe Tomlinson B.A., San José State University, 2009 M.A., San José State University, 2012 August 2020 Acknowledgments The Central European History Society (CEHS) funded a visit to the Bayerisches Haupstaatsarchiv and Staatsarchiv München in the summer of 2016. Further support came from the LSU history department and the generous contributions of members of the LSU Osher Lifelong Learning Institute (OLLI) for a subsequent visit in the summer of 2018. The staffs of the Bayerisches Haupstaatsarchiv and Staatsarchiv München are extremely dedicated, professional, and were more than helpful with their assistance.
    [Show full text]
  • Argula Von Grumbach (1492-1563) Letter of Protest to the Faculty of the University of Ingolstadt, 1523
    Argula von Grumbach (1492-1563) Letter of Protest to the Faculty of the University of Ingolstadt, 1523 To the honorable, worthy, highborn, erudite, noble, stalwart Rector and all the Faculty of the University of Ingolstadt: When I heard what you had done to Arsacius Seehofer under terror of imprisonment and the stake, my heart trembled and my bones quaked. What have Luther and Melanchthon taught save the Word of God? You have condemned them. You have not refuted them. Where do you read in the Bible that Christ, the apostles, and the prophets imprisoned, banished, burned or murdered anyone? You tell us we must obey the magistrates. Correct. But neither the pope, nor the Kaiser, nor the princes have any authority over the Word of God. You need not think you can pull God, the prophets and the apostles out of heaven with papal decretals drawn from Aristotle, who was not a Christian at all. I am not unacquainted with the word of Paul that women should be silent in church [1 Tim. 1:2] but, when no man will or can speak, I am driven by the word of the Lord when he said, “He who confesses me on earth, him will I confess and he who denies me, him will I deny” [Matt 10, Luke 9], and I take comfort in the words of the prophet Isaiah [3:12], “I will send you children to be your princes and women to be your rulers.” You seek to destroy all of Luther’s works. In that case you will have to destroy the New Testament, which he has translated.
    [Show full text]
  • Verification of Compact Articles in External Workflow 1
    Open Access Operations Margarita Bläß, Heidelberg, December 2019 Verification of Compact articles in external workflow 1. Introduction 1.1. What is Compact? Compact is an agreement that offers authors the opportunity to publish open access in hybrid subscription-based journals and is based on the Open Choice publishing option. The agreement combine the costs for article processing charges (APC) and access to subscription content for participating institutions. Researchers from participating institutions are able to publish their articles open access at no extra cost to them. Compact supports Gold Open Access publishing and promotes the transition to more transparent and sustainable open access publishing. Additionally it enables researchers to comply with their funders´ open access requirements. Currently, every journal offering Open Choice is automatically part of the nine Compact agreements: Agreement Start date Dutch agreement January 2015 UK agreement October 2015 Austrian agreement January 2016 Swedish agreement July 2016 Finnish agreement October 2018 Hungarian agreement January 2019 Polish agreement January 2019 Qatar agreement February 2019 Norwegian agreement1 January 2020 DEAL January 2020 For more information on the copyright and license terms, and Compact in general, please refer to https://www.springer.com/gp/open-access/springer-open-choice/springer-compact 1.2. Guideline abstract The document includes the guidelines for the identification and verification of Compact articles in the external workflow which is created for Publishing Editors, External Publishing Editors, Vendors and the OA Verification team, including a detailed overview of the identification and verification process. The external workflow comprises journals which do not use the “standard production workflow” (i.e.
    [Show full text]