DOCSLIB.ORG

Instrument-Based Vs. Target-Based Rules∗

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Instrument-Based Vs. Target-Based Rules∗ Instrument-Based vs. Target-Based Rules∗ Marina Halacy Pierre Yaredz April 15, 2020 Abstract We study rules based on instruments vs. targets. Our application is a New Keynesian economy where the central bank has non-contractible information about aggregate demand shocks and cannot commit to policy. Incentives are provided to the central bank via punishment which is socially costly. Instrument- based rules condition incentives on the central bank's observable choice of policy, whereas target-based rules condition incentives on the outcomes of policy, such as inflation, which depend on both the policy choice and realized shocks. We show that the optimal rule within each class takes a threshold form, imposing the worst punishment upon violation. Target-based rules dominate instrument- based rules if and only if the central bank's information is sufficiently precise, and they are relatively more attractive the less severe the central bank's commit- ment problem. The optimal unconstrained rule relaxes the instrument threshold whenever the target threshold is satisfied. Keywords: Policy Rules, Private Information, Delegation, Mechanism De- sign, Monetary Policy, Policy Objectives JEL Classification: D02, D82, E52, E58, E61 ∗We would like to thank Hassan Afrouzi, V. V. Chari, John Cochrane, John Geanakoplos, Johannes H¨orner,Navin Kartik, Narayana Kocherlakota, Jen Jen La'O, Alessandro Lizzeri, George Mailath, Rick Mishkin, Ken Rogoff, Larry Samuelson, and Mike Woodford for comments. Jan Knoepfle and Angus Lewis provided excellent research assistance. yYale University and CEPR: [email protected]. zColumbia University and NBER: [email protected]. 1 Introduction The question of whether to base incentives on agents' actions or the outcomes of these actions arises in various contexts. In particular, scholars and policymakers have long debated on the merits of using instrument-based vs. target-based rules to guide monetary policy.1 Instrument-based rules evaluate central bank performance on the choice of policy, taking a number of forms such as money growth rules, interest rate rules, and exchange rate rules. In contrast, target-based rules evaluate central bank performance on the outcomes of policy, such as the realized inflation level, price level, and output growth. Target-based rules have become increasingly popular over the last decades, with 60 central banks around the world adopting inflation targeting since 1990 (International Monetary Fund, 2019).2 Many of the early adopters were central banks in advanced economies, like those in New Zealand, Canada, and the United Kingdom, while more recent adopters included emerging economies such as India and Russia. Nevertheless, many developing economies still guide monetary policy based only on instruments; for example, many countries in Sub-Saharan Africa remain under an instrument-based rule in the form of a fixed exchange rate regime.3 As for the US, a number of studies describe US monetary policy as adhering to an instrument-based rule in the form of a Taylor rule from the 1980s through the early 2000s, while pursuing an inflation target since that time.4 In this paper, we develop a simple model to study and compare instrument-based and target-based rules. Our focus is on the implications of these rules for optimal incen- tives. While both rule classes are broadly used and discussed in the context of mone- tary policy, as just described, the theoretical literature on central bank incentives|and 1This debate includes many arguments for and against Taylor rules; see Svensson(2003), Bernanke(2004, 2015), McCallum and Nelson(2005), Appelbaum(2014), Blinder(2014), Taylor (2014), Kocherlakota(2016), and the Statement on Policy Rules Legislation signed by a num- ber of economists, available at http://web.stanford.edu/~johntayl/2016_pdfs/Statement_on_ Policy_Rules_Legislation_2-29-2016.pdf. There are also numerous discussions of inflation tar- geting; see Bernanke and Mishkin(1997), Bernanke et al.(1999), Mishkin(1999, 2017), Svensson (2003), and Woodford(2007), among others. 2This includes the 19 countries in the Eurozone plus 41 other countries classified by International Monetary Fund(2019) as inflation targeters. 3Of the 48 countries in sub-Saharan Africa, 21 have conventional pegs, 18 have managed exchange rates, and the rest have floating exchange rates. See International Monetary Fund(2019). 4See Kahn(2012), Taylor(2012), and Nikolsko-Rzhevskyy, Papell, and Prodan(2019) for the first time period and Bernanke(2012), Yellen(2012), and Shapiro and Wilson(2019) for the second one. The International Monetary Fund does not provide a classification of US monetary policy. 1 incentives in principal-agent relationships, more generally|has largely focused on one rule class or the other, lacking a general comparison that can inform this discussion. Using a mechanism design approach, we present a theory that elucidates the relative benefits of instrument-based vs. target-based rules and shows which class will be pre- ferred as a function of the environment. Additionally, we characterize the optimal unconstrained or hybrid rule and examine how combining instruments and targets can improve welfare. Our model builds on a canonical New Keynesian framework. Society delegates monetary policy to a central bank that lacks commitment and is therefore biased towards looser monetary policy and higher inflation at the time of choosing policy. The central bank's policy choice is observable, but optimal policy depends on non- contractible information that the central bank possesses. Specifically, the central bank observes a private forecast of aggregate demand shocks to the economy (e.g. Romer and Romer, 2000), with a more negative forecast implying a looser socially optimal choice of monetary policy. Inflation and the output gap depend on both the central bank's policy choice and the realized aggregate demand shock. Incentives are provided to the central bank via the threat of punishment. Punish- ment imposes a cost on both the central bank and society, stemming for example from formal sanctions, leadership replacement, or loss of central bank budget, autonomy, or reputation.5 We distinguish between different classes of rules depending on how incentives are structured: we say that the rule is instrument-based if punishments depend only on the central bank's policy, and the rule is target-based if punishments depend only on the outcome of policy, namely realized inflation.6 Under either class of rule, punishments could be tailored so as to incentivize the central bank to choose the socially optimal policy, thus eliminating any distortions arising from the central bank's inflation bias. However, because punishing the central bank is socially costly, society must trade off the benefit of mitigating its inflation bias with the benefit of 5See Rogoff(1985), Garfinkel and Oh(1993), and Walsh(1995, 2002) for a discussion of the differ- ent forms these punishments can take. In New Zealand the Governor of the Reserve Bank is subject to dismissal if he fails to achieve the inflation target (H¨ufner, 2004), and in several countries central- bank officials are subject to scrutiny of their policies with requirements of written explanations, or public hearings in the Parliament, or reviews by independent experts (Svensson, 2010). Consequences such as dismissal imply a cost not only to the central banker but to society at large. 6Our setting is one where the \divine coincidence" holds (e.g. Blanchard and Gal´ı, 2007), implying a one-to-one mapping between inflation and the output gap (holding fixed expectations of the future). Therefore, a target rule based on inflation is equivalent to one based on the output gap, and giving the central bank full discretion would be optimal absent an inflation bias. 2 reducing equilibrium punishments.7 Our analysis begins by showing that, within each class, an optimal rule takes a threshold form, with violation of the threshold leading to the worst feasible punish- ment. In the case of an optimal instrument-based rule, the central bank is allowed to choose any policy up to a threshold and is maximally punished for choosing looser policy. The idea is analogous to that in other models of delegation (reviewed below); since the central bank is inflation-biased relative to society, this punishment structure is optimal to deter the central bank from pursuing excessively expansionary policies. In the case of an optimal target-based rule, the central bank is subject to an inflation threshold, being maximally punished if realized inflation is above it. This punishment structure also incentivizes the central bank to not choose excessively expansionary policy, since this results in higher inflation in expectation. High-powered incentives of this form arise in moral hazard settings with hidden action.8 Our main result uses this characterization of the optimal rules for each class to compare their performance. We show that target-based rules dominate instrument- based rules if and only if the central bank's private information is sufficiently precise. To illustrate, suppose the central bank has a perfect forecast of aggregate demand shocks. Then society guarantees the socially optimal policy by providing steep in- centives under a target-based rule, where punishments do not occur on path because the perfectly informed central bank chooses the policy that delivers the inflation tar- get outcome. This target-based rule strictly dominates any instrument-based rule, as the latter cannot incentivize the central bank while giving it enough flexibility to respond to its information. At the other extreme, suppose the central bank has no private information. Then society guarantees the ex-ante socially optimal policy with an instrument-based rule that ties the hands of the central bank, namely that punishes the central bank if any looser policy is chosen. This instrument-based rule strictly dominates any target-based rule, as the latter gives the central bank unnec- essary discretion and requires on-path punishments to provide incentives. Our main result proves that this logic applies more generally as we locally vary the precision of the central bank's private information, away from the extremes of perfect and no information.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Efficient Money Burning in General Domains
    Efficient Money Burning in General Domains? Dimitris Fotakis1, Dimitris Tsipras2, Christos Tzamos2, and Emmanouil Zampetakis2 1 School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, 157 80 Athens, Greece 2 Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, U.S.A. Emails: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Abstract. We study mechanism design where the objective is to maximize the residual surplus, i.e., the total value of the outcome minus the payments charged to the agents, by truthful mechanisms. The motivation comes from applications where the payments charged are not in the form of actual monetary transfers, but take the form of wasted resources. We consider a general mechanism design setting with m discrete outcomes and n multidimensional agents. We present two randomized truthful mechanisms that extract an O(log m) fraction of the maximum social surplus as residual surplus. The first mechanism achieves an O(log m)-approximation to the social surplus, which is improved to an O(1)-approximation by the second mechanism. An interesting feature of the second mechanism is that it optimizes over an appropriately restricted space of probability distributions, thus achieving an efficient tradeoff between social surplus and the total amount of payments charged to the agents. 1 Introduction The extensive use of monetary transfers in Mechanism Design is due to the fact that so little can be implemented truthfully in their absence (see e.g., [20]). On the other hand, if monetary transfers are available (and their use is acceptable and feasible in the particular application), the famous Vickrey-Clarke-Groves (VCG) mechanism succeeds in truthfully maximizing the social surplus (a.k.a.
    [Show full text]
  • Mystery of Banking.Pdf
    The Mystery of Banking Murray N. Rothbard The Mystery of Banking Murray N. Rothbard Richardson & Snyder 1983 First Edition The Mystery of Banking ©1983 by Murray N. Rothbard Library of Congress in publication Data: 1. Rothbard, Murray N. 2. Banking 16th Century-20th Century 3. Development of Modern Banking 4. Types of Banks, by Function, Bank Fraud and Pitfalls of Banking Systems 5. Money Supply. Inflation 1 The Mystery of Banking Murray N. Rothbard Contents Chapter I Money: Its Importance and Origins 1 1. The Importance of Money 1 2. How Money Begins 3 3. The Proper Qualifies of Money 6 4. The Money Unit 9 Chapter II What Determines Prices: Supply and Demand 15 Chapter III Money and Overall Prices 29 1. The Supply and Demand for Money and Overall Prices 29 2. Why Overall Prices Change 36 Chapter IV The Supply of Money 43 1. What Should the Supply of Money Be? 44 2. The Supply of Gold and the Counterfeiting Process 47 3. Government Paper Money 51 4. The Origins of Government Paper ,Money 55 Chapter V The Demand for Money 59 1. The Supply of Goods and Services 59 2. Frequency of Payment 60 3. Clearing Systems 63 4. Confidence in the Money 65 5. Inflationary or Deflationary Expectations 66 Chapter VI Loan Banking 77 Chapter VII Deposit Banking 87 1. Warehouse Receipts 87 2. Deposit Banking and Embezzlement 91 2 The Mystery of Banking Murray N. Rothbard 3. Fractional Reserve Banking 95 4. Bank Notes and Deposits 103 Chapter VIII Free Banking and The Limits on Bank Credit Inflation 111 Chapter X Central Banking: Determining Total Reserves 143 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Information Management in Banking Crises∗
    Information Management in Banking Crises Joel Shapiroyand David Skeiez University of Oxford and Federal Reserve Bank of New York August 5, 2013 Abstract A regulator resolving a bank faces two audiences: depositors, who may run if they believe the regulator will not provide capital, and banks, which may take excess risk if they believe the regulator will provide capital. When the regulator’s cost of injecting capital is pri- vate information, it manages expectations by using costly signals: (i) A regulator with a low cost of injecting capital may forbear on bad banks to signal toughness and reduce risk taking, and (ii) A regula- tor with a high cost of injecting capital may bail out bad banks to increase confidence and prevent runs. Regulators perform more infor- mative stress tests when the market is pessimistic. Keywords: bank regulation, bailouts, reputation, financial crisis, sovereign debt crisis, stress tests JEL Codes: G01, G21, G28 We thank Mitchell Berlin, Elena Carletti, Brian Coulter, Frederic Malherbe, Juan Francisco Martinez, Alan Morrison, José-Luis Peydró Alcalde, Tarun Ramadorai, Peter Tufano and the audiences at the Bank of England, Ecole Polytechnique, EFMA 2013, EUI, LBS FIT working group, ISCTE, Queens College, UPF and U. Porto for helpful comments. We also thank the Editor and the Referees for detailed comments and suggestions. We thank Alex Bloedel, Mike Mariathasan, and Ali Palida for excellent research assistance. The views expressed in this paper represent those of the authors and not necessarily those of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York or the Federal Reserve System. ySaïd Business School, University of Oxford.
    [Show full text]
  • The Prospects for Economic Recovery and Inflation
    FOR RELEASE ON DELIVERY THURSDAY, MAY 15, 1975 9:30 A.M. EDT THE PROSPECTS FOR ECONOMIC RECOVERY AND INFLATION Remarks by Henry C. Wallich Member, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System at The Conference Board's Conference on the Management of Funds: Strategies for Survival in New York City Thursday, May 15, 1975 Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis THE PROSPECTS FOR ECONOMIC RECOVERY AND INFLATION Remarks by Henry C. Wallich Member, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System at The Conference Board's Conference on the Management of Funds: Strategies for Survival in New York City Thursday, May 15, 1975 I am glad to have this opportunity to address an audience of funds managers on the two principal economic problems that we must resolve: economic recovery and inflation. The Conference Board, to which we are indebted for the opportunity to engage in this discussion, has -- wisely, I think — put these topics at the beginning of a Conference on "Strategies for Survival. 11 The prospects for survival of a free enterprise economy, such as we have known, lie, I believe, in disciplining our freedoms of economic choice sufficiently to avoid the inflationary excesses that produce recessions, including inflationary actions intended to overcome recession. My message here today will be that the outlook for recovery is good and that the prospects for further progress against inflation depend very much on how we handle the recovery. If common sense can be made to prevail, you as funds managers should be able to look forward not only to survival, but hopefully to a positive rate of return.
    [Show full text]
  • Commitment Vs. Flexibility∗
    Commitment vs. Flexibility¤ Manuel Amadory Iv¶an Werningz George-Marios Angeletosx Abstract We study the optimal tradeo® between commitment and flexibility in a consumption-savings model. Individuals expect to receive relevant information regarding tastes, and thus value the flexibility provided by larger choice sets. On the other hand, they also expect to su®er from temptation, with or without self-control, and thus value the commitment a®orded by smaller choice sets. The optimal commitment problem we study is to ¯nd the best subset of the individual's budget set. We show that the optimal commitment problem leads to a principal-agent formulation. We ¯nd that imposing a minimum level of savings is always a feature of the solution. Necessary and su±cient conditions are derived for minimum-savings policies to completely characterize the solu- tion. Individuals may perfectly mimic such a policy with a portfolio of liquid and illiquid assets. We discuss applications of our results to situations with sim- ilar tradeo®s, such as paternalism, the design of ¯scal constitutions to control government spending, and externalities. ¤We thank comments and suggestions from Daron Acemoglu, Andy Atkeson, Paco Buera, VV Chari, Peter Diamond, Doireann Fitzgerald, Narayana Kocherlakota and especially Pablo Werning. We also thank seminar and conference participants at the University of Chicago, Rochester, Harvard, M.I.T., Stanford, Pennsylvania, Berkeley, New York, Yale, Maryland, Austin-Texas, Torcuato di Tella, Stanford Institute for Theoretical Economics, American Economic Association, Society of Economic Dynamics, CESifo Venice Summer Institute, the Central Bank of Portugal, and the Federal Reserve Banks of Cleveland and Boston.
    [Show full text]
  • Money and Inflation
    CHAPTER 4 Money and Inflation Learning Objectives Working for Peanuts? After studying this chapter, you should be able to: In Germany in 1923, people burned paper currency rather than wood or coal. In Zimbabwe in 2008, people were 4.1 Define money and explain its functions paying for health care with peanuts, not money. Burning (pages 104–114 ) paper money and using goods instead of money to pay for goods and services are signs that a country’s money has 4.2 Explain how central banks change the money become worthless. supply (pages 114–118 ) People in most countries are used to some inflation. 4.3 Describe the quantity theory of money, and Even a moderate inflation rate of 2% or 3% per year grad- use it to explain the connection between ually reduces the purchasing power of money. For exam- changes in the money supply and the infla- ple, if over the next 30 years the average rate of inflation in tion rate (pages 118–124 ) Canada is 2% (the mid-point of the current target inflation rate (see Chapter 12 ) , a bundle of goods and services that 4.4 Discuss the relationships among the growth costs $100 now will cost over $180 in 30 years. Germany rate of money, inflation, and nominal interest rates (pages 124–127 ) and Zimbabwe experienced the much higher inflation rates known as hyperinflation , which is usually defined as 4.5 Explain the costs of a monetary policy that a rate exceeding 50% per month (or 13 000% a year). allows inflation to be greater than zero The inflation rates suffered by Germany and Zimbabwe (pages 128–132) were extreme, even by the standards of hyperinflations.
    [Show full text]
  • Instrument-Based Vs. Target-Based Rules
    Instrument-Based vs. Target-Based Rules Marina Halac Pierre Yared Yale University Columbia University January 2020 Motivation Should central bank incentives be based on instruments or targets? • Instruments: interest rate, exchange rate, money growth • Targets: inflation, price level, output growth Global central banks have moved towards inflation targets • 26 central banks since 1990, 14 EMs • But many EMs continue fixed exchange rate regimes This paper: Do target-based rules dominate instrument-based ones? What We Do Monetary model to study instrument-based vs. target based rules • Rule is optimal mechanism in setting with non-contractible information Elucidate benefits of each class, when one is preferred over the other • Compare performance as a function of the environment Characterize optimal unconstrained or hybrid rule • Examine how combining instruments and targets can improve welfare Preview of Model Canonical New Keynesian model with demand shocks Central bank (CB) lacks commitment, has private forecast of demand • Inflation/output depends on monetary policy and realized demand Incentives: Socially costly punishments (money burning); no transfers • Instrument-based rule: Punishment depends on interest rate • Target-based rule: Punishment depends on inflation Main Results In each class, optimal rule is a maximally enforced threshold • Instrument-based: Punish interest rates below a threshold • Target-based: Punish inflation above a threshold Target-based dominate instrument-based iff CB info is precise enough • More appealing on the margin if CB commitment problem is less severe Optimal hybrid rule improves with a simple implementation • Instrument threshold that is relaxed when target threshold is satisfied • E.g., interest rate rule which switches to inflation target once violated Related Literature Optimal monetary policy institutions • Rogoff 1985, Bernanke-Mishkin 1997, McCallum-Nelson 2005, Svensson 2005, Giannoni-Woodford 2017 • This paper: Mechanism design to characterize and compare rules Commitment vs.
    [Show full text]
  • Check-Up 2-14 Englisch-05
    CHECK-UP CLIENT INFORMATION OF PRIVATBANKIERS REICHMUTH & CO, INTEGRAL INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT CH-6000 LUCERNE 7 RUETLIGASSE 1 PHONE +41 41 249 49 49 WWW.REICHMUTHCO.CH MAY 2014 EDITORIAL THE PROFIT IS IN THE PURCHASE PRICE In recent years, the financial world FEW ATTRACTIVE BUYING OPPORTUNITIES AT PRESENT has been preoccupied with crises and how to deal with them, and a typi - ne year ago, controls on the move - Buy low, sell high cal trial and error process has en - Oment of capital were introduced for As the saying goes, the profit is in the sued. There now appears to be some - the first time in the Eurozone, namely in purchase price. Investments bought cheap thing of a fresh dawn emerging for Cyprus. A new bank bail-in model was are more likely to turn a profit than the banking sector, and the ground also tested at the same time, which tar - ex pensive ones. However, equities are rules for the future are becoming geted client deposits. This model has usually only cheap when things don't clear er. Although we take little plea - since been declared as the future stan - look so good. This was the case in Italy sure in what in some cases is excessive dard for bank bail-ins in the Eurozone. a year ago, but today more so for Russia regulation, we are nonetheless pleased Fast forward twelve months, and there or the emerging markets. In such a phase, to see this degree of clarity. After all, is jubilation as Greece returns to the ca - the risks are undeniable, but as long as this is essential if we are to be able pital market, issuing a new 5-year bond the problems are common knowledge once again to focus our services with a yield of under 5%.
    [Show full text]
  • Banking on the Underworld <~>
    Banking on the Underworld <~> A strictly Economic appreciation of the Chinese practice of burning (token) Money Guido Giacomo Preparata* * I am greatly indebted to Professor Jien-Chieh Ting of the Academia Sinica, in Taipei, for the truly precious help, knowledge, and guidance, which he has so generously offered me, and which have been essential for carrying out the research on Buddhism, welfare community, and monetary economics during my stay in Taiwan. 1 Abstract The custom of burning mock-money as a symbolic offering of nutrients and sustenance to one’s ancestors is here analyzed in terms of its economic meaning and significance. The theme is treated from two different angles. One is that of the political economy of the gift, which concerns itself with the final uses to which society conveys its economic surplus. The other is that of monetary institutionalism, which seeks to understand what the practice itself actually represents in light of the monetary arrangements that rule the economic exchange within the community itself. The thesis is that, at a first remove, the custom appears to fall into the category of “wasteful expenditure,” in that it is not manifestly conducive to any augmentation of the system’s efficiency. But on a subtler level, it is not exactly so for two orders of reasons. First, because the custom is habitually accompanied by subsidiary donations; and, second, because, in this donative moment, the custom importantly reveals, through its conversion of real cash into “sacrificial” token-money, a constitutive, yet hidden, property of money, namely its perishability. Keywords: Ghost-money, Burning, Ancestors, Perishability, Gift, China, Taiwan, Afterlife, Superstition, Religion 2 One of my Quanzhou interviewees pulled out several leaves of the Taiwan top-of-the-line Triad Gold from a chest of drawers as if she was storing some great heirloom; the way she handled it, I could scarcely imagine her burning it, although burning it is the proper way of storing its value.
    [Show full text]
  • Nber Working Paper Series Commitment Vs. Flexibility
    NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES COMMITMENT VS. FLEXIBILITY Manuel Amador Iván Werning George-Marios Angeletos Working Paper 10151 http://www.nber.org/papers/w10151 NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138 December 2003 We’d like to thank comments and suggestions from Daron Acemoglu, Andy Atkeson, Peter Diamond and especially Pablo Werning. The views expressed herein are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the National Bureau of Economic Research. ©2003 by Manuel Amador, Iván Werning, and George-Marios Angeletos. All rights reserved. Short sections of text, not to exceed two paragraphs, may be quoted without explicit permission provided that full credit, including © notice, is given to the source. Commitment Vs. Flexibility Manuel Amador, Iván Werning, and George-Marios Angeletos NBER Working Paper No. 10151 December 2003 JEL No. H0, O0 ABSTRACT This paper studies the optimal trade-off between commitment and flexibility in an intertemporal consumption/savings choice model. Individuals expect to receive relevant information regarding their own situation and tastes - generating a value for flexibility - but also expect to suffer from temptations - generating a value for commitment. The model combines the representations of preferences for flexibility introduced by Kreps (1979) with its recent antithesis for commitment proposed by Gul and Pesendorfer (2002), or alternatively, the hyperbolic discounting model. We set up and solve a mechanism design problem that optimizes over the set of consumption/saving options available to the individual each period. We characterize the conditions under which the solution takes a simple threshold form where minimum savings policies are optimal. Our analysis is also relevant for other issues such as situations with externalities or the problem faced by a "paternalistic" planner, which may be important for thinking about some regulations such as forced minimum schooling laws.
    [Show full text]
  • Nber Working Paper Ser~S Price Level Targeting Vs
    NBER WORKING PAPER SER~S PRICE LEVEL TARGETING VS. INFLATION TARGETING: A FREE LUNCH? Lars E. O. Svensson Working Paper 5719 NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138 August 1996 Part of the work for this paper was done during a visit to the International Finance Division at the Federal Reserve Board, Washington D. C., in July 1995, I am grateful to the Division for its hospitality. I thank George Akerlof, Alan Blinder, Guy Debelle, Jon Faust, Stanley Fischer, John Hassler, Dale Henderson, Miles Kimball, David Lebow, Frederic Mishkin, Torsten Persson, Carl Walsh and participants in seminars at the CEPR Money Workshop at IGIER, Milan, BES, Institute for Graduate Studies, Geneva, NBER Summer Institute Monetary Economics Workshop, Tilburg University, University of California, Berkeley, and University of California, Santa Cruz, for discussions and comments. I also thank Marten Blix for research assistance, and Maria Gil and Christina tinnblad for secretarial and editorial assistance. Expressed views as well as any errors and obscurities are my own responsibility. This paper is part of NBER’s research programs in International Finance and Macroeconomics, and Monetary Economics. Any opinions expressed are those of the author and not those of the National Bureau of Economic Research. O 1996 by Lars E. O. Svensson. All rights reserved. Short sections of text, not to exceed two paragraphs, may be quoted without explicit permission provided that full credit, including O notice, is given to the source, NBER Working Paper5719 August 1996 PRICE LEVEL TARGETING VS. INFLATION TARGETING: A FREE LUNCH? WAGE ABSTRACT Price level targeting (without base drift) and inflation targeting (with base drift) are compared under commitment and discretion, with persistence in unemployment.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mytery of Banking
    THE MYSTERY OF BANKING o Murray N. Rothbard RICHARDSON & SNYDER 1983 First Edition The Mystery of Banking ®1983 by Murray N. Rothbard ISBN: 0--943940-04-4 Library of Congress in publication Data: 1. Rothbard, Murray N. 2. Banking 16th Century-20th Century 3. Development of Modern Banking 4. Types of Banks, by Function, Bank Fraud and Pitfalls of Banking Systems 5. Money Supply. Inflation DEDICATION CONTENTS o Chapter I Money: Its Importance and Origins 1 1. The Importance of Money 1 2. How Money Begins 3 3. The Proper Qualities of Money 6 4. The Money Unit 9 Chapter II What Determines Prices: Supply and Demand 15 Chapter III Money and Overall Prices 29 1. The Supply and Demand for Money and Overall Prices 29 2. Why Overall Prices Change 36 Chapter IV The Supply of Money 43 1. What Should the Supply of Money Be? 44 2. The Supply of Gold and the Counterfeiting Process 47 3. Government Paper Money 51 4. The Origins of Government Paper Money 55 Chapter V The Demand for Money 59 1. The Supply of Goods and Services 59 2. Frequency of Payment 60 3. Clearing Systems 63 4. Confidence in the Money 65 5. Inflationary or Deflationary Expectations 66 Chapter VI Loan Banking 77 Chapter VII Deposit Banking 87 1. Warehouse Receipts 87 2. Deposit Banking and Embezzlement 91 3. Fractional Reserve Banking 95 4. Bank Notes and Deposits 103 Chapter VIII Free Banking and 111 The Limits on Bank Credit Inflation Chapter IX Central Banking: Removing the Limits 127 Chapter X Central Banking: Determining Total Reserves 143 1.
    [Show full text]