Historical Essays

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Historical Essays The Bureau of Reclamation: History Essays from the Centennial Symposium Volumes I and II Bureau of Reclamation U.S. Department of the Interior Denver, Colorado 2008 Table of Contents Commissioner’s Introduction ............................................................................xxvii Senior Historian’s Introduction .......................................................................... xxix Bibliography of Papers Published in other Locations ......................................xxxiii VOLUME 1 Section I: Technological and Engineering History of Reclamation Concrete Dam Evolution: The Bureau of Reclamation’s Contributions to 2002. Gregg N. Scott, Larry K. Nuss, and John LaBoon ................. 1 I. Introduction ...........................................................................................1 II. Masonry Dams and the Early Years ......................................................4 III. The Amazing Arch and Developments of the 1920s .......................... 10 IV. Prelude to Hoover Dam ...................................................................... 14 V. Hoover Dam—Quantum Leaps Forward ............................................19 V.A. Boulder Canyon Project Final Reports: Part V—Technical Investigations: Bulletin 2— Slab Analogy Experiments, Denver 1938 ........................................22 V.B. Boulder Canyon Project Final Reports: Part V—Technical Investigations: Bulletin 3—Model Tests of Boulder Dam, Denver 1939 ....................................................................................23 V.C. Boulder Canyon Project Final Reports: Part V—Technical Investigations: Bulletin 4—Stress Studies for Boulder Dam, Denver 1939 ....................................................................................23 V.D. Boulder Canyon Project Final Reports: Part V—Technical Investigations: Bulletin 6—Model Test of Arch and Cantilever Elements, Denver 1939 ....................................................................24 V.E. Boulder Canyon Project Final Reports: Part VII—Cement and Concrete Investigations: Bulletin 1—Thermal Properties of Concrete, Denver 1940 ....................................................................................24 V.F. Boulder Canyon Project Final Reports: Part VII—Cement and Concrete Investigations: Bulletin 4—Mass Concrete Investigations, Denver, 1940. ...................................................................................25 V.G. Boulder Canyon Project Final Reports: Part VII—Cement and Concrete Investigations: Bulletin 2—Investigations of Portland Cement, Denver, 1940 ....................................................................................26 VI. Hydraulics for High Concrete Dams ................................................ 26 iii VII. World War II Era - Large Gravity Dam ............................................30 VIII. The Post-War Boom—Developments Continue ...............................34 IX. The Failure of Malpasset Dam—Rock Mechanics and Foundation Design Develops ...........................................................37 X. The Double-Curvature Arch—A New Standard for Effi ciency .........................................................................................40 XI. Structural Analysis Developments ....................................................44 A. Development and Computerization of the Trial Load Method ....................................................................................44 B. Linear Structural Analysis ..........................................................49 C. Nonlinear Structural Analysis ....................................................51 C.1. Nonlinear structural analysis of Monticello Dam ................................................................51 C.2. Nonlinear Structural Analysis of Pueblo Dam ...................................................................... 54 XII. Roller-Compacted Concrete—Rapid Construction for Gravity Dams .............................................................................55 XIII. Transition to Dam Safety—Applying Technology to Reduce Risk .....................................................................................59 XIV. Conclusions ......................................................................................63 Bibliography of Sources Consulted (in the order used in the paper.) .......63 100 Years of Embankment Dam Design and Construction in the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation. Richard Lyman Wiltshire .................... 67 Introduction ...............................................................................................67 Reclamation’s Design and Construction Organizations............................ 68 Period I (1902-1918)—Reclamation’s Design and Construction Organizations ..............................................................68 Period II (1919-1933)—Reclamation’s Design and Construction Organizations ..............................................................70 Period III (1934-1944)—Reclamation’s Design and Construction Organizations ..............................................................70 Period IV (1945-1975)—Reclamation’s Design and Construction Organizations ..............................................................71 Period V (1976-2002)—Reclamation’s Design and Construction Organizations ..............................................................71 Modern Embankment Dam Design and Construction ..............................72 Reclamation’s History of Embankment Dam Design and Construction .............................................................................................. 78 Period I (1902-1918)—Reclamation’s History of Embankment Dam Design and Construction ......................................79 Upstream Impervious Zone Supported by Downstream Rockfi ll Zone ...................................................................................84 Upstream Impervious Zone Supported by Downstream Gravel Zone .....................................................................................84 iv Modifi ed Homogeneous Section ...................................................... 85 Belle Fourche Dam ...........................................................................85 Period II (1919-1933)—Reclamation’s History of Embankment Dam Design and Construction ................................... 93 Period III (1934-1944)—Reclamation’s History of Embankment Dam Design and Construction ................................... 99 Period IV (1945-1975)—Reclamation’s History of Embankment Dam Design and Construction ................................. 103 Period V (1976-2002)—Reclamation’s History of Embankment Dam Design and Construction ................................. 116 Conclusion ..............................................................................................131 Endnotes ..................................................................................................131 Historical Development of Durable Concrete for the Bureau of Reclamation. Timothy P. Dolen ................................................................ 135 Introduction .............................................................................................135 What is Concrete? ...................................................................................135 Early Obstacles to Durable Concrete ......................................................136 Mechanisms of Deterioration in the Western United States ................... 137 Sulfate Attack ....................................................................................137 Alkali-aggregate Reactions ...............................................................138 Freezing and Thawing Deterioration ................................................139 Developing the State-of-the-Art of Concrete Technology ......................139 The Early Years–The Concrete Pioneers (1902-1918) ..................... 140 The Abrams Generation (1918-1928) ...............................................142 Boulder Dam / The “Hoover Generation” (1928-1945) ................... 143 The Post-War Generation: “The Constructors” (1945-1990) ........... 146 The Present Generation and Beyond (1990- ) ................................147 Conclusions .............................................................................................147 The Author’s Closure: The Challenge for the Twenty-fi rst Century—Identify, Protect, Preserve ................................................149 Endnotes ..................................................................................................150 History of Drainage in the Bureau of Reclamation: A History of Subsurface Drainage in the Bureau of Reclamation. Rodney G. TeKrony, Glenn D. Sanders, and Billy Cummins ........... 153 Abstract ...................................................................................................153 Introduction .............................................................................................154 Legislation ..................................................................................................157 Fact Finder’s Act (December 5, 1924), (ch. 4, 43 Stat. 672 .................157 Omnibus Adjustment Act (May 25, 1926) ........................................... 157 Reclamation Project Act of 1939 (August 4, 1939) (ch. 418, 53 Stat. 1187) ....................................................................................157 v Interior Department Appropriation Act, 1953 (July 9, 1952) (ch. 597, 66 Stat. 445) ........................................................................158
Recommended publications
  • Seminoe Reservoir Inflow
    Annual Operating Plans Table of Contents Preface ..................................................................................... 5 Introduction ............................................................................. 5 System Planning and Control ................................................ 7 System Operations Water Year 2018 ................................... 10 Seminoe Reservoir Inflow ........................................................................... 10 Seminoe Reservoir Storage and Releases .............................................. 10 Kortes Reservoir Storage and Releases .................................................. 12 Gains to the North Platte River from Kortes Dam to Pathfinder Dam .................................................................................................... 13 Pathfinder Reservoir Storage and Releases ........................................... 14 Alcova and Gray Reef Reservoirs Storage and Releases .................... 17 Gains to the North Platte River from Alcova Dam to Glendo Reservoir ........................................................................................... 18 Glendo Reservoir Storage and Releases ................................................. 18 Gains to the North Platte River from Glendo Dam to Guernsey Reservoir ........................................................................................... 21 Guernsey Reservoir Storage and Releases ............................................ 22 Precipitation Summary for Water Year 2018 ..........................................
    [Show full text]
  • North Platte Project, Wyoming and Nevraska
    North Platte Project Robert Autobee Bureau of Reclamation 1996 Table of Contents The North Platte Project ........................................................2 Project Location.........................................................2 Historic Setting .........................................................4 Project Authorization.....................................................7 Construction History .....................................................8 Post-Construction History................................................20 Settlement of Project ....................................................26 Uses of Project Water ...................................................30 Conclusion............................................................32 Suggested Readings ...........................................................32 About the Author .............................................................32 Bibliography ................................................................33 Manuscript and Archival Collections .......................................33 Government Documents .................................................33 Articles...............................................................33 Newspapers ...........................................................34 Books ................................................................34 Other Sources..........................................................35 Index ......................................................................36 1 The North Platte Project
    [Show full text]
  • Code of Colorado Regulations 1 H
    DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES Division of Wildlife CHAPTER W-1 - FISHING 2 CCR 406-1 [Editor’s Notes follow the text of the rules at the end of this CCR Document.] _________________________________________________________________________ ARTICLE I - GENERAL PROVISIONS #100 – DEFINITIONS See also 33-1-102, C.R.S and Chapter 0 of these regulations for other applicable definitions. A. "Artificial flies and lures" means devices made entirely of, or a combination of, natural or synthetic non-edible, non-scented (regardless if the scent is added in the manufacturing process or applied afterward), materials such as wood, plastic, silicone, rubber, epoxy, glass, hair, metal, feathers, or fiber, designed to attract fish. This definition does not include anything defined as bait in #100.B below. B. "Bait" means any hand-moldable material designed to attract fish by the sense of taste or smell; those devices to which scents or smell attractants have been added or externally applied (regardless if the scent is added in the manufacturing process or applied afterward); scented manufactured fish eggs and traditional organic baits, including but not limited to worms, grubs, crickets, leeches, dough baits or stink baits, insects, crayfish, human food, fish, fish parts or fis h eggs. C. "Chumming" means placing fish, parts of fish, or other material upon which fish might feed in the waters of this state for the purpose of attracting fish to a particular area in order that they might be taken, but such term shall not include fishing with baited hooks or live traps. D. “Game fish” means all species of fish except unregulated species, prohibited nongame, endangered and threatened species, which currently exist or may be introduced into the state and which are classified as game fish by the Commission.
    [Show full text]
  • Report No. REC-ERC-90-L, “Compilation Report on the Effects
    REC-ERC-SO-1 January 1990 Denver Office U. S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation 7-2090 (4-81) Bureau of Reclamation TECHNICAL REEPORT STANDARD TITLE PAG 3. RECIPIENT’S CATALOG ~0. 5. REPORT DATE Compilation Report on the Effects January 1990 of Reservoir Releases on 6. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE Downstream Ecosystems D-3742 7. AUTHOR(S) 6. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION E. Cheslak REPORT NO. J. Carpenter REC-ERC-90-1 9. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS 10. WORK UNIT NO. Bureau of Reclamation Denver Office 11. CONTRACT OR GRANT NO. Denver CO 80225 13. TYPE OF REPORT AND PERIOD COVERED 12. SPONSORING AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS Same 14. SPONSORING AGENCY CODE DIBR 15. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES Microfiche and/or hard copy available at the Denver Office, Denver, Colorado. Ed: RDM 16. ABSTRACT Most of the dams built by the Bureau of Reclamation were completed before environmental regulations such as the Clean Water Act, National Environmental Protection Act, or Toxic Substances Control Act existed. The management and operation of dams was instituted under conditions where the ecology of the downstream habitat was unknown and largely ignored. Changing or modifying structures, flow regimes, and land use patterns are some of the efforts being pursued by the Bureau to reconcile or mitigate the effects of impoundment to comply with these environmental policies and to maximize the potential for recreation, fisheries, and water quality in tailwater habitats for the water resource users. The purpose of this report is to provide a reference document intended to aid in the management, compliance, and problem solving processes necessary to accomplish these goals in Bureau tailwater habitats.
    [Show full text]
  • Colorado-Big Thompson Project
    75TH CONGRESS} DOCUMENT 1" Session . SENATE { No. 80 COLORADO-BIG THOMPSON PROJECT SYNOPSIS OF REPORT ON COLORADO-BIG THOMPSON PROJECT, PLAN OF DEVELOPMENT AND COST ESTIMATE PRE­ PARED BY THE BUREAU OF RECLAMA­ TION, DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR PRESENTED BY MR. ADAMS JUNE 15, 1937-0rdered to be printed without illustrations UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON: 1931 Pare Letter of Northern Colorado Water Users' Association ___________ . ____ _ VII Letter of the Western Slope Protective Association ___________________ _ VII Outline of con.struction and operating conditions·___________ ~ ____ .:. _____ _ 1 Manner of operation of,project facilities ,and auxiliary features_, _______ _ 2 Summa.ry-Colorado-Blg Thompson proJect __________ .. ______________ _ 5 Histo~----------_--------------------_----------------- 5 Irrigation use ________________________ ._______ - _ - __ --- __ - __________ _ 6 Need of sopplemental water __________________________ . ________ _ 6: Supplemental 'water supply ________________________________________ _ 8 Land classification-Colorado River areas _______________________ _ 9 Water supply ___________________________________ ~ ____ ._ - ___ - __ . ___ _ 10 Yield of Granby Reservoir __________ ~ __ - _~ _____ --- _---- _ - ______ _ 11 Effect of the diversion on western slope development. _____________ _ 13 Diversion plan and structures ______________________ - _______________ _ Replacement _________________________________________________ _ 14 14 Granby Reservoir storage ______________________________________
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix M. Wilding and Sanderson. a Pictorial Guide to Riparian
    Appendix M A Pictorial Guide to Riparian Changes Following Flow Alteration This page left intentionally blank. A pictorial guide to riparian changes following flow alteration Thomas Wilding, Colorado State University John Sanderson, The Nature Conservancy There are many examples in the scientific literature of how stream and river ecosystems respond to flow modification (for a starting point, see Poff et al. 1997). A pilot study for the Roaring Fork basin presented “flow-ecology” relationships that describe the relationship of flow modification with cottonwood, warmwater fish, trout and invertebrates (Watershed Flow Evaluation Tool Pilot; CDM 2009). After receiving feedback on the pilot study from the basin roundtable, improved flow-ecology relationships were then developed for the upper Colorado River. This included further work on cottonwood and willow plant communities (Wilding and Sanderson 2010), warmwater fish (Wilding et al. 2011b), and invertebrates (Wilding et al. 2011a). Predicting how ecosystems and species respond to flow alteration is key to environmental flow assessments. The predictions from scientific models, including flow- ecology relationships, are represented as numbers. If you cannot picture what these numbers translate to in reality then the models are not particularly informative for understanding the consequences of flow alteration. So we were asked to show how the numbers translate to real-life examples, presenting pictures of how plants and animals respond to flow change. Our objective is to present examples that clearly and succinctly illustrate flow-induced changes for riparian vegetation (plants beside streams). For each example, the information presented includes the source, flow alteration and a picture showing the ecological change.
    [Show full text]
  • Upper Colorado River Basin Water Resources Planning Model User's
    Upper Colorado River Basin Water Resources Planning Model User’s Manual July 2016 Table of Contents TABLE OF FIGURES ............................................................................................................................. IV TABLE OF TABLES ............................................................................................................................... VI 1. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................ 1‐1 1.1 BACKGROUND .................................................................................................................................. 1‐1 1.2 DEVELOPMENT OF THE UPPER COLORADO RIVER BASIN WATER RESOURCES PLANNING MODEL ...................... 1‐1 1.3 RESULTS .......................................................................................................................................... 1‐2 1.4 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ....................................................................................................................... 1‐3 2. WHAT’S IN THIS DOCUMENT .................................................................................................... 2‐1 2.1 SCOPE OF THIS MANUAL ..................................................................................................................... 2‐1 2.2 MANUAL CONTENTS .......................................................................................................................... 2‐1 2.3 WHAT’S IN OTHER CDSS DOCUMENTATION ..........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Facilities in the North Platte River Drainage Basin Above and Including Guernsey Dam and the Four Inland Lakes Near Scottsbluff, Nebraska
    PREFACE This report documents the operation of all Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation) facilities in the North Platte River Drainage Basin above and including Guernsey Dam and the four Inland Lakes near Scottsbluff, Nebraska. This area of the North Platte River Drainage Basin is simply referred to in this report as the Basin. References to average in this document will refer to the average of the historical record for the years 1981-2010, except for water year 2012 information which uses the years 1982-2011. In each coming year this period will be advanced by one year to maintain a running 30-year average. INTRODUCTION The System of dams, reservoirs, and powerplants on the North Platte River (referred to as the "System" in this text) is monitored and in most cases operated and managed from the Wyoming Area Office in Mills, Wyoming. The operation and management of the System is aided by the use of a Programmable Master Supervisory Control, computerized accounting processes, an extensive network of Hydromet stations, control crest measurement weirs at gaging stations, SNOw TELemetry (SNOTEL) stations, and a snowmelt runoff forecasting procedure used by the Water Management Branch. The System consists of a number of individual water resource projects that were planned and constructed by Reclamation. The individual projects and features are operated as an integrated system to achieve efficiencies that increase multipurpose benefits. The drainage basin which affects the System covers an area from northern Colorado to southeastern Wyoming, encompassing 16,224 square miles. Storage reservoirs in the System include four off stream reservoirs known as the Inland Lakes in western Nebraska as shown in Figure 21.
    [Show full text]
  • Windy Gap Firming Project Water Resources Technical Report
    Windy Gap Firming Project Water Resources Technical Report U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation Great Plains Region December 2007 Water Resources Technical Report Windy Gap Firming Project prepared by ERO Resources Corporation 1842 Clarkson Street Denver, Colorado 80218 and Boyle Engineering Corporation 215 Union Blvd., Suite 500 Lakewood, Colorado 80228 Acronyms and Abbreviations AF acre-feet BESTSM Boyle Engineering Stream Simulation Model C-BT Colorado-Big Thompson Project CDSS Colorado Decision Support System cfs cubic feet per sect CRWCD Colorado River Water Conservation District CWCB Colorado Water Conservation Board DW Denver Water EIS Environmental Impact Statement EOM end-of-month HUP Historic User’s Pool MPWCD Middle Park Water Conservancy District Non-Participants Windy Gap unit holders not participating in the Firming Project NRCS Natural Resources Conservation Service NCWCD Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District PACSM Platte and Colorado Simulations Model Participants Windy Gap Firming Project Participants Reclamation U.S. Bureau of Reclamation SEO State Engineer’s Office USFWS U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service USGS U.S. Geological Survey WCFC Willow Creek Feeder Canal WGFP Windy Gap Firming Project WWTP Wastewater treatment plant Alternatives Alternative 1 — No Action, Enlarge Ralph Price Reservoir Alternative 2 — Proposed Action, Chimney Hollow Reservoir with Prepositioning Alternative 3 — Chimney Hollow Reservoir and Jasper East Reservoir Alternative 4 — Chimney Hollow Reservoir and Rockwell/Mueller
    [Show full text]
  • Il\)S-Fred'y\ -Ptow ~Ystem
    ·"' EFFECTS OF Y'.:..OW PA'rTERNS BELOW LARGE a stronger preference for overhead bank cover than do smaller DAMS ON STRE..bJi BENTHOS: ~ REVIEW though competition and territoriality may explain this James V. Ward ., difference. ,,.· Department of Zoology and Entomology 2) The been d~vei~ped is a habitat Colorado State University .. · Fort Collins, Colorado 80523 ioss of available trout I' ABSTRACT and the I sections investigated, The variously modified flow patterns below dams ~e considered in rela­ ' to exist between le cov;: and. standing tionship to the effects Qn ecological factors of importance to the benthic crop. this area is needed to allow the biologist communities of receiving streams. Species composition and diversity are coo­ the siderably modified by upstream impoundments. Benthic standing crop may be ~0 uantify the biological significance of dewatering enhanced or reduced, largely depending on the flow regime. Daily flow fluctu­ of various stream reaches. ations, if not too severe, may b~ associated with dense benthic populations as long as a relatively constant seasonal flow pattern is maintained. Little is known regarding subtle, sublethal effects of dams on life cycle phenomena and biotic interactions and more data are needed on current preferenda of import­ ant fish food species. Any flow regime which significantly reduces habitat diversity should be avoided. A diverse substrate with silt-free interstices will considerably reduce deleterious effects of periods of reduced flow, I 1: fluctuating flow and high current velocity. In establishing flow criteria for benthos, each dam must be considered individually. INTRODUCTION The productivity, diversity and composition of the stream benthic community is extremely important to the total functioning of the stream eco­ Needs • Soui€e.e.~ Il\)s-fred'Y\ -Ptow ~ystem.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Quality and Trend Analysis of Colorado-Big Thompson System
    Water Quality and Trend Analysis of Colorado–Big Thompson System Reservoirs and Related Conveyances, 1969 Through 2000 By Michael R. Stevens Prepared in cooperation with the NORTHERN COLORADO WATER CONSERVANCY DISTRICT, BUREAU OF RECLAMATION, and the CITY OF FORT COLLINS Water-Resources Investigations Report 03–4044 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior Gale A. Norton, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Charles G. Groat, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2003 For sale by U.S. Geological Survey, Information Services Box 25286, Denver Federal Center Denver, CO 80225 For more information about the USGS and its products: Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov/ Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. iii Contents Abstract.......................................................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................... 2 Purpose and Scope ............................................................................................................................. 2 Previous Studies and Acknowledgments........................................................................................ 3 Description of Study Area .................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Leaf Litter Processing in a Regulated Rocky Mountain Stream
    The above data clearly demonstrate selectivity in the Aureliu rmurita L. (Scyphozoa, Semaeostomae). Wiss. diets of the four colnrnon species that show predation Martin Luther Univ. HaBle-i$litter-aberg hfath. Naturwiss on other coelenterates. However. no predator was de- Reihe 33) : 479-482. M. pendent on a single prey species. Tt is difficult to evaluate HYMN, L. 2940. Ob5ervations and experiments on the physiology of medusae. Biol. Bull. (Woods Hole) 79: the degree of competition involved. Not only do the 282-296. four species vary in period of maximum abundance in LEBOUK,M. V. 1922. The food of plankton organisnas. J. Mar the bay but all four species will accept noncoelenterate Riol. Assoc. U.M. 12: 644-677. prey. This study will be extended to investigate preda- 1923. The food of plankton organisms HI. J. Mar. tion on other possible prey including fish larvae. Biol. Assoc. U.K. 13: 70-92. LC)C;INOVA,N. P., AND N. M. PERZOVA.1967. Some data on Acknowledgnie~zts- We are very grateful for the facil- ecology of feeding of pelagic Coelemterata in the White ities of the Pacific Biological Station, Nanaimo, B.C., where Sea. Issled. Fauny Morei 7415): 21-28. (In Russian) this study was carried out and the cooperation of the staff. ~~CCORMICK,J. M. 1969. Trophic relationships of hydro- Dr Z. Kabata kindly translated several Russian papers. Miss medusae in Yaquina Bay, Oregon. Northwest Sci. 43: Valerie Overend assisted in collection of specimens. The 207-2 14. project was supported by NRC Grant A2007 to M.N.A.
    [Show full text]