Invasive Plants

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Invasive Plants Volunteers Make a Difference in an Early Detection Rapid Response Citizen Science Program Julie Combs (PNW – IPC) September 16, 2014 UW Botanic Gardens http://www.naeppc.org/ http://www.pnw-ipc.org/ PNW- IPC Programs ● Nursery Certification Program certify nurseries that agree not to sell invasive plants ● Education / Information exchange trainings - conferences - workshops – listserve ● EDRR Citizen Science Invasive Species Program train citizen scientist to identify and document EDRR and other priority invasive species in order to: – Support county, state and federal management agencies – Reduce cost and resources spent on management – Decrease newly established invaders and threats to PNW biodiversity Early Detection Rapid Response (EDRR) Approach • Detect non-native, invasive species populations that are new to an area and in low abundance and control before they have a chance to establish and spread Benefits • Most successful approach to invasive species management after prevention • Cost effective • Less damage to the environment http://sofia.usgs.gov/sfrsf/rooms/spec ies/invasive/focus/usorigin.gif Pilot Year Survey Areas - EDRR Program 2012 Survey Areas - EDRR Program 2014 • 2012 (8 WA counties) • 2013 (15 WA counties) • 2014 (16 WA counties) PNW-IPC EDRR SPECIES LIST DEVELOPMENT AND PARTNERSHIPS 2012-2014 • PNW-IPC Board Members (e.g., S. Manning (IPC Inc.), S. Reichard (UW), W. DesCamp and A. Halpern (WA State Noxious Weed Control Board) , L. Seebacher (Dept. of Ecology), T. Harrington (USDA Forest Service), S. Bautista (USDA Forest Service) • WSDA (Washington State Dept. of Agriculture (G. Haubrich) • County Weed Coordinators and CWMA Board Members (e.g., M. Hudson, M. Baden, D. Jacobson, B. Wamsley, T. Davis, and N. Ness, K. Strathmann) • WISC (Washington Invasive Plant Council, W. Brown), WASNWB (WA State Noxious Weed Board, W. DesCamp) • State and National Parks/Forests (L. Whiteaker , Mt. Rainier NP; C. Chandler, J. Leingang, L. Swartz, C. Bartlett, USFS) Flowering rush, Butomus umbellatus Tansy ragwort, Senecio jacobaea English holly, Ilex aquifolium French broom, Genista monspessulana Class A Images by: Ben Legler Class B Image by: Ben Legler Monitor List Image by: Ben Legler Class A Image by: WSNWBC Survey Assignments General Assignments: • Any public land located in 16 counties within CWMA’s (National Forest, National Park, County and State Parks, Wildlife Rec. Areas, etc.) Specific Assignments: • Select trails on US Forest Service Land (Olympic NF, Gifford Pinchot NF and Okanogan-Wenatchee NF— Naches Ranger District) • Select NAP (Natural Area Preserve) and NRCA (Natural Resource Conservation Area) on DNR Land (E.g., Columbia Hills NAP, Chehalis River Surge Plain South Fork Skokomish Area, ONF NAP) Indian Heaven Wilderness, GPNF Columbia Hills NAP Chehalis River Surge Plain NAP Glacier View Wilderness, GPNF Volunteer Data Pathway Citizen Scientist Surveys reported to PNW-IPC: Identification (Verification) Polygonum x bohemicum infestation (Bohemian knotweed) Image: J.K. Combs • Land Agency where species was found (e.g., USDA FS) • WA County Noxious Weed Boards • WA State Noxious Weed Board • EDDMapS, national mapping/reporting system • Washington State Department of Agriculture (WSDA) • Washington Invasive Species Council (WISC) Monitoring / Outcome reporting to volunteers, partners Centaurea diffusa (diffuse and funding agencies knapweed) Image: G.D. Carr Volunteers make a difference in 2012-2014 Cyndy Dillon pulls a Jim Miltimore records Richard Rice conducting a bouquet of tansy ragwort GPS coordinates to survey and marking yellow on a roadside in the document occurrence flag iris with DNR volunteers Olympic National Forest of a new priority in Preacher Slough, a small Image: John Dillon invasive species parallel tidal slough of the (Arctium lappa; Chehalis River Surge Plain NAP burdock) in the Gifford Image: Bud Hardwick Pinchot National Forest Image: Carol Miltimore Volunteers make a difference in 2012-2014 Image: WSNWB Image: Marianna Bissonnette • Marianna finds a few scattered plants of Geranium lucidum (Class A) at the Hoffstadt Bluffs Visitor Center at Mount St. Helens. • Reported to Wendy DesCamp (WSNWB) and Angelica Velazquez (Cowlitz Noxious Weed Coordinator). Angelica coordinated treatment with 24 hours of finding. Volunteers make a difference in 2012-2014 Images: Quasar Surprise • Students from Avanti High School in Olympia, WA survey for Geranium robertianum (herb Robert) in the Olympic National Park as part of their Sustainable Agriculture course. Volunteers make a difference in 2012-2014 Images: Bud Hardwick • Bud finds a few scattered plants of Spartina angelica (Class A) on the Kukutali Preserve (Skagit Co.) jointly managed by WA State Park and Swinomish Indian Tribe. • Jon Boe from the Swimomish Tribe responded “…We didn’t really expect to find anything there but it just shows you never know.” Plants were subsequently dug out and sight will be monitored in future. Volunteers make a difference in 2012-2014 Image from WTU Herbarium collection. Label data: Whatcom Co. In lightly forested area along NW Road, .5 miles from Bellingham city limits. Moist to dry soil. R.J. Taylor Images: Bud Hardwick 7/30/89 • Bud finds small populations plants of Epipactis helleborine (broad-leaved helleborine orchid) in several locations in Skagit Co. (e.g., Mt. Blanchard Conservation/Recreation Area DNR and WFDW). • Wendy DesCamp (WA State Noxious Weed Control Board) just informed us that this plant is now listed as a “monitor” species on the State Noxious Weed list as a result of Bud’s findings and others who have reported to Laurel Baldwin (Whatcom Co. Noxious Weed Coordinator) this species popping up recently in Whatcom and Snohomish Counties. Volunteers make a difference in 2012-2014 Metrics of Success • Trained 237 citizens to conduct surveys to search for EDRR and other priority invasive species • 160 volunteers enrolled # Surveys % Surveys that Acres Surveyed Miles Volunteer conducted documented EDRR Travelled Hours populations 145 54% 1,827 15,836 1,712 English holly Yellow archangel (Class B) (Monitor list) Tansy ragwort (Class B) Image by: WSNWBC and Shiny geranium (Class A) Image by: Ben Legler Image by: Ben Legler W. DesCamp Image by: WSNWBC Programmatic Challenges 1. Large scope of survey area and choosing priority plants 2. How to increase volunteer participation? Out of 160 volunteers who go through training and sign up to volunteer ~ 15% participates • Offer more insensitive trainings • More frequent follow up over the course of the season e.g., send out “Featured Hikes” e-mails • Reduce time volunteers spend on reporting e.g., streamline data reporting with on-line reporting system similar to other programs (e.g., King County Weed Watchers…Sasha, how is that going?) “The PNW IPC works to protect Pacific Northwest landscapes from invasive non-indigenous plants.” We Thank Our Volunteers, Partners and Funding Agencies (NFWF, NFF, WSDA, DNR) For further questions and information visit our website (www.pnw-ipc.org) or contact Julie Combs, EDRR Citizen Science Program Director ([email protected]) Whatcom County NWCB.
Recommended publications
  • Vaccinium Processing in the Washington Cascades
    Joumul of Elhoobiology 22(1): 35--60 Summer 2002 VACCINIUM PROCESSING IN THE WASHINGTON CASCADES CHERYL A 1viACK and RICHARD H. McCLURE Heritage Program, Gifford Pirwhot National Forest, 2455 HighlL¥1lf 141, Dou! Lake, WA 98650 ABSTRACT,~Among Ihe native peoples of south-central Washington, berries of the genus Vaccil1ium hold a signHicant place among traditional foods. In the past, berries were collected in quantity at higher elevations in the central Cascade Mmmtains and processed for storage. Berries were dried along a shallow trench using indirect heat from d smoldering log. To date, archaeological investigations in the Gifford Pinchot National Forest have resulted in lhe identil1cation of 274 Vatcin;um drying features at 38 sites along the crest of the Cascades. Analyses have included archaeobotanical sampling,. radiocarbon dating. and identification of related features, incorporating ethnohistonc and ethnographic studies, Archae­ ological excavations have been conducted at one of the sites. Recent invesHgations indicate a correlation behveen high feature densities and specific plant commu­ nities in the mountain heml()(~k zone. The majority of the sites date from the historic period, but evidence 01 prehistoflc use is also indicated, Key words: berries, Vaccinium~ Cascade rv1ountains, ethnornstory, ardtaeubotanical record. RESUMEN,~-Entre los indig~.nas del centro-sur de Washinglon, las bayas del ge­ nero Vaccinium occupan un 1ugar significati''ilo entre los alirnentos tradicionales. En 121 pasado, estas bayas se recogfan en grandes canlidades en las zonas elevadas del centro de las rvtontanas de las Cascadas y se procesaban para e1 almacena­ miento, Las bayas Be secabl''ln n 10 largo de una zanja usando calor indirecto prod­ uddo POt un tronco en a"'icuas.
    [Show full text]
  • Layout 1 Copy 1
    Events Contact Information Map and guide to points Festivals Goldendale From the lush, heavily forested April Earth Day Celebration – Chamber of Commerce of interest in and around Goldendale 903 East Broadway west side to the golden wheat May Fiddle Around the Stars Bluegrass 509 773-3400 W O Y L country in the east, Klickitat E L www.goldendalechamber.org L E Festival – Goldendale S F E G W N O June Spring Fest – White Salmon E L County offers a diverse selection Mt. Adams G R N O H E O July Trout Lake Festival of the Arts G J Chamber of Commerce Klickitat BICKLETON CAROUSEL July Community Days – Goldendale 1 Heritage Plaza, White Salmon STONEHENGE MEMORIAL of family activities and sight ~ Presby Quilt Show 509 493-3630 seeing opportunities. ~ Show & Shine Car Show www.mtadamschamber.com COUNTY July Nights in White Salmon City of Goldendale Wine-tasting, wildlife, outdoor Art & Fusion www.cityofgoldendale.com WASHINGTON Aug Maryhill Arts Festival sports, and breathtaking Sept Huckleberry Festival – Bingen Museums scenic beauty beckon visitors Dec I’m Dreaming of a White Salmon Carousel Museum–Bickleton Holiday Festival 509 896-2007 throughout the seasons. Y E L S Open May-Oct Thurs-Sun T E J O W W E G A SON R R Rodeos Gorge Heritage Museum D PETE O L N HAE E IC Y M L G May Goldendale High School Rodeo BLUEBIRDS IN BICKLETON 509 493-3228 HISTORIC RED HOUSE - GOLDENDALE June Aldercreek Pioneer Picnic and Open May-Sept Thurs-Sun Rodeo – Cleveland Maryhill Museum of Art June Ketcham Kalf Rodeo – Glenwood 509 773-3733 Aug Klickitat County Fair and Rodeo – Open Daily Mar 15-Nov 15 Goldendale www.maryhillmuseum.org Aug Cayuse Goldendale Jr.
    [Show full text]
  • The Wild Cascades
    THE WILD CASCADES Fall, 1984 2 The Wild Cascades PRESIDENT'S MESSAGE ONCE THE LINES ARE DRAWN, THE BATTLE IS NOT OVER The North Cascades Conservation Council has developed a reputation for consistent, hard-hitting, responsible action to protect wildland resources in the Washington Cascades. It is perhaps best known for leading the fight to preserve and protect the North Cascades in the North Cascades National Park, the Pasayten and Glacier Peak Wilderness Areas, and the Ross Lake and Lake Chelan National Recreation Areas. Despite the recent passage of the Washington Wilderness Act, many areas which deserve and require wilderness designation remain unprotected. One of the goals of the N3C must be to assure protection for these areas. In this issue of the Wild Cascades we have analyzed the Washington Wilderness Act to see what we won and what still hangs in the balance (page ). The N3C will continue to fight to establish new wilderness areas, but there is also a new challenge. Our expertise is increasingly being sought by government agencies to assist in developing appropriate management plans and to support them against attempts to undermine such plans. The invitation to participate more fully in management activities will require considerable effort, but it represents a challenge and an opportunity that cannot be ignored. If we are to meet this challenge we will need members who are either knowledgable or willing to learn about an issue and to guide the Board in its actions. The Spring issue of the Wild Cascades carried a center section with two requests: 1) volunteers to assist and guide the organization on various issues; and 2) payment of dues.
    [Show full text]
  • Northeast Chapter Volunteer Hours Report for Year 2013-2014
    BACK COUNTRY HORSEMEN OF WASHINGTON - Northeast Chapter Volunteer Hours Report for Year 2013-2014 Work Hours Other Hours Travel Equines Volunteer Name Project Agency District Basic Skilled LNT Admin Travel Vehicle Quant Days Description of work/ trail/trail head names Date Code Code Hours Hours Educ. Pub. Meet Time Miles Stock Used AGENCY & DISTRICT CODES Agency Code Agency Name District Codes for Agency A Cont'd A U.S.F.S. District Code District Name B State DNR OKNF Okanogan National Forest C State Parks and Highways Pasayten Wilderness D National Parks Lake Chelan-Sawtooth Wilderness E Education and LNT WNF Wenatchee National Forest F Dept. of Fish and Wildlife (State) Alpine Lakes Wilderness G Other Henry M Jackson Wilderness M Bureau of Land Management William O Douglas Wilderness T Private or Timber OLNF Olympic National Forest W County Mt Skokomish Wilderness Wonder Mt Wilderness District Codes for U.S.F.S. Agency Code A Colonel Bob Wilderness The Brothers Wilderness District Code District Name Buckhorn Wilderness CNF Colville National Forest UMNF Umatilla National Forest Salmo-Priest Wilderness Wenaha Tucannon Wilderness GPNF Gifford Pinchot National Forest IDNF Idaho Priest National Forest Goat Rocks Wilderness ORNF Oregon Forest Mt Adams Wilderness Indian Heaven Wilderness Trapper Wilderness District Codes for DNR Agency B Tatoosh Wilderness MBS Mt Baker Snoqualmie National Forest SPS South Puget Sound Region Glacier Peak Wilderness PCR Pacific Cascade Region Bolder River Wilderness OLR Olympic Region Clear Water Wilderness NWR Northwest Region Norse Peak Mt Baker Wilderness NER Northeast Region William O Douglas Wilderness SER Southeast Region Glacier View Wilderness Boulder River Wilderness VOLUNTEER HOURS GUIDELINES Volunteer Name 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Seattle Backpacking Washington Experience
    Route Details for the Bronze Backpack, Silver Backpack, and Gold Backpack Award Badges Because the objective of the badges is to experience the variety of backpacking regions available in Washington, it’s not necessary to do each route exactly as described in the Routes & Places database or the references. A trip that follows approximately the same route with extensions or minor variations can be substituted. However, for routes whose descriptions include a “Key Experience” alternate routes must include that experience in order to qualify. Reference(s) Region Route Distance Gain Days Key Experience Notes WTA Books Olympic Peninsula Beaches 100 Classic Hikes in Washington, 2nd Edition #99 Olympic Coast North: The Shipwreck Coast 20.2 260 3 North Coast Route Backpacking Washington 1st Edition #1 South Coast Wilderness Trail - 100 Classic Hikes: Washington, 3rd Edition #2 Olympic Coast South: The Wildcatter Coast 17.5 1900 3 Toleak Point Backpacking Washington 1st Edition #2 Ozette Triangle 9.4 400 2 Cape Alava Loop (Ozette Triangle) 100 Classic Hikes: Washington, 3rd Edition #3. Shi Shi Beach and Point of the Shi Shi Beach 8.8 200 2 Arches 100 Classic Hikes: Washington, 3rd Edition #4. Olympic Peninsula Inland 100 Classic Hikes: Washington, 3rd Edition #6 Enchanted Valley 26.5 1800 3 Enchanted Valley Backpacking Washington #3 Spend at least one night in the Seven 100 Classic Hikes: Washington, 3rd Edition #8 Seven Lakes Basin 20 4000 3 Lakes Basin area. High Divide Loop Backpacking Washington #4 100 Classic Hikes in Washington 2nd Edition #98 Upper Lena Lake 14 3900 2 Upper Lena Lake Backpacking Washington #11 Hoh River to Glacier Meadows Walk the Hoh River Trail and camp at 34 4500 4 Glacier Meadows.
    [Show full text]
  • Wilderness Camping & Campfire Restrictions
    0 R D E R GOAT ROCKS WILDERNESS, WILLIAM 0. DOUGLAS WILDERNESS, TRAPPER CREEK WILDERNESS, INDIAN HEAVEN WILDERNESS MT. ADAMS WILDERNESS, TATOOSH WILDERNESS, AND GLACIER VIEW WILDERNESS Gifford Pinchot and Wenatchee National Forests In order to protect the vegetation around lakes, streams, and meadows, to reduce soil compaction and erosion in heavily used areas and to enharice the Wilderness character and resource, the following acts, pursuant to 36 CFR 261.50 (a), are prohibited within Goat Rocks Wilderness, William 0. Douglas Wilderness, Trapper Creek Wilderness, Indian Heaven Wilderness, Mt. Adams Wilderness, Tatoosh Wilderness, and Glacier View Wilderness located within the Snoqualmie National Forest and the Gifford Pinchot National Forest and administered by the Wenatchee National Forest, until further notice. I Camping within 100 feet slope distance from the shoreline of any lake and/or the Pacific Crest National Scenic Trail, EXCEPT at Dana Yelverton Shelter within Goat Rocks Wilderness, 36 CFR 261.58e. II Building, maintaining, or using a campfire, 36 CFR 261.52a. A. Within Goat Rocks Wilderness: within Shoe Lake Basin, at Dana Yelverton Shelter or within 1/4 mile of the shoreline of Goat Lake. B. Within Mt. Adams Wilderness: (1) Above the Round-The-Mountain Trail #9 from the Gifford Pinchot National Forest Boundary west to Pacific Crest Trail #2000 and (2) Above Pacific Crest Trail #2000 north to the intersection of Highline Trail #114 and (3) Above trail #114 north and east to the Gifford Pinchot Forest Boundary. C. Within Tatoosh Wilderness within Tatoosh Lakes Basin. D. Within William 0. Douglas Wilderness within 1/4 mile of the shoreline of Dewey Lakes.
    [Show full text]
  • Page 1464 TITLE 16—CONSERVATION § 1132
    § 1132 TITLE 16—CONSERVATION Page 1464 Department and agency having jurisdiction of, and reports submitted to Congress regard- thereover immediately before its inclusion in ing pending additions, eliminations, or modi- the National Wilderness Preservation System fications. Maps, legal descriptions, and regula- unless otherwise provided by Act of Congress. tions pertaining to wilderness areas within No appropriation shall be available for the pay- their respective jurisdictions also shall be ment of expenses or salaries for the administra- available to the public in the offices of re- tion of the National Wilderness Preservation gional foresters, national forest supervisors, System as a separate unit nor shall any appro- priations be available for additional personnel and forest rangers. stated as being required solely for the purpose of managing or administering areas solely because (b) Review by Secretary of Agriculture of classi- they are included within the National Wilder- fications as primitive areas; Presidential rec- ness Preservation System. ommendations to Congress; approval of Con- (c) ‘‘Wilderness’’ defined gress; size of primitive areas; Gore Range-Ea- A wilderness, in contrast with those areas gles Nest Primitive Area, Colorado where man and his own works dominate the The Secretary of Agriculture shall, within ten landscape, is hereby recognized as an area where years after September 3, 1964, review, as to its the earth and its community of life are un- suitability or nonsuitability for preservation as trammeled by man, where man himself is a visi- wilderness, each area in the national forests tor who does not remain. An area of wilderness classified on September 3, 1964 by the Secretary is further defined to mean in this chapter an area of undeveloped Federal land retaining its of Agriculture or the Chief of the Forest Service primeval character and influence, without per- as ‘‘primitive’’ and report his findings to the manent improvements or human habitation, President.
    [Show full text]
  • Page 1517 TITLE 16—CONSERVATION § 1131 (Pub. L
    Page 1517 TITLE 16—CONSERVATION § 1131 (Pub. L. 88–363, § 10, July 7, 1964, 78 Stat. 301.) Sec. 1132. Extent of System. § 1110. Liability 1133. Use of wilderness areas. 1134. State and private lands within wilderness (a) United States areas. The United States Government shall not be 1135. Gifts, bequests, and contributions. liable for any act or omission of the Commission 1136. Annual reports to Congress. or of any person employed by, or assigned or de- § 1131. National Wilderness Preservation System tailed to, the Commission. (a) Establishment; Congressional declaration of (b) Payment; exemption of property from attach- policy; wilderness areas; administration for ment, execution, etc. public use and enjoyment, protection, preser- Any liability of the Commission shall be met vation, and gathering and dissemination of from funds of the Commission to the extent that information; provisions for designation as it is not covered by insurance, or otherwise. wilderness areas Property belonging to the Commission shall be In order to assure that an increasing popu- exempt from attachment, execution, or other lation, accompanied by expanding settlement process for satisfaction of claims, debts, or judg- and growing mechanization, does not occupy ments. and modify all areas within the United States (c) Individual members of Commission and its possessions, leaving no lands designated No liability of the Commission shall be im- for preservation and protection in their natural puted to any member of the Commission solely condition, it is hereby declared to be the policy on the basis that he occupies the position of of the Congress to secure for the American peo- member of the Commission.
    [Show full text]
  • Pacific Northwest Wilderness
    pacific northwest wilderness for the greatest good * Throughout this guide we use the term Wilderness with a capital W to signify lands that have been designated by Congress as part of the National Wilderness Preservation System whether we name them specifically or not, as opposed to land that has a wild quality but is not designated or managed as Wilderness. Table of Contents Outfitter/Guides Are Wilderness Partners .................................................3 The Promise of Wilderness ............................................................................4 Wilderness in our Backyard: Pacific Northwest Wilderness ...................7 Wilderness Provides .......................................................................................8 The Wilderness Experience — What’s Different? ......................................9 Wilderness Character ...................................................................................11 Keeping it Wild — Wilderness Management ...........................................13 Fish and Wildlife in Wilderness .................................................................15 Fire and Wilderness ......................................................................................17 Invasive Species and Wilderness ................................................................18 Climate Change and Wilderness ................................................................19 Resources ........................................................................................................21
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Columbia Cascade Ecoprovince Wildlife Assessment and Inventory
    Draft Columbia Cascade Ecoprovince Wildlife Assessment and Inventory Submitted by Paul Ashley and Stacey H. Stovall Table of Contents Table of Contents........................................................................................................................... i List of Figures .............................................................................................................................. iii List of Tables................................................................................................................................. v 1.0 Wildlife Assessment Framework .......................................................................................1 1.1 Assessment Tools.......................................................................................................3 2.0 Physical Features..............................................................................................................3 2.1 Land Area....................................................................................................................3 2.2 Physiography...............................................................................................................4 3.0 Socio-Political Features ....................................................................................................5 3.1 Land Ownership ..........................................................................................................5 3.2 Land Use.....................................................................................................................7
    [Show full text]
  • Public Law 98-339 98Th Congress
    PUBLIC LAW 98-339-JULY 3, 1984 98 STAT. 299 Public Law 98-339 th Congress 98 An Act To designate certain National Forest System lands in the State of Washington for July 3, 1984 inclusion in the National Wilderness Preservation System, and for other purposes. [S. 837] Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the Washington United States of America in Congress assembled, That this Act may State Wilderness be referred to as the "Washington State Wilderness Act of 1984". Act of 1984. SEC. 2. (a) The Congress finds that- National (1) many areas of undeveloped National Forest System lands Wilderness Preservation in the State of Washington possess outstanding natural charac­ System. teristics which give them high values as wilderness and will, if National Forest properly preserved, contribute as an enduring resource of wil­ System. derness for the benefit ofthe American people; (2) the Department of Agriculture's second roadless area review and evaluation (RARE II) of National Forest System lands in the State of Washington and the related congressional review of such lands have identified areas which, on the basis of their landform, ecosystem, associated wildlife, and location, will help to fulfill the National Forest System's share of a quality National Wilderness Preservation System; and (3) the Department of Agriculture's second roadless area review and evaluation of National Forest System lands in the State of Washington and the related congressional review of such lands have also identified areas which do not possess outstanding wilderness attributes or which possess outstanding energy, mineral, timber, grazing, dispersed recreation and other values and which should not now be designated as components of the National Wilderness Preservation System but should be available for nonwilderness multiple uses under the land man­ agement planning process and other applicable laws.
    [Show full text]
  • Wilderness Areas Along the Pacific Crest Trail
    Vancouver C A N A B D R I T I A S H C O Wilderness Areas L U M B MT BAKER- 1 I A OKANO G SNOQ 2 AN- UALMIE along the WE N ATCHEE NATIONAL 3 LO YMPIC NATIONAL NATIONAL FOREST Pacific Crest Trail FOREST Seattle 4 FOREST 5 50 years of Wilderness on the PCT W A S H I N On Sept. 3, 1964, President Lyndon B. Johnson signed the Wilderness Act into law, recognizing 7 6 G T O placesN “where the earth and its community of life are untrammeled by man, where man himself 8 GIFFORD PINCH is a visitor who does not remain.” O NATIONALT 9 FOREST Countless people have passed and will continue to pass through America’s most treasured land- 10 scapes, including the 48 wilderness areas that include the Pacific Crest Trail. 11 Portland The Wilderness Act established the National Wilderness Preservation System and set aside an 12 initial 9.1 million acres of wild lands for the use and benefit of the American people. Over the past MT HOOD 13 50 years, Congress has added more than 100 million acres to this unique land preservation system. NATIONAL FOREST To learn more about the country’s wilderness areas, visit www.wilderness.net. SIUSL A W NATIONAL FOREST O 1 Pasayten Wilderness – Oct. 2, 1968 R 14 E G 15 O N 2 Stephen Mather Wilderness – Nov. 16, 1988 (Wash. Park Wilderness Act of 1988) WILLAMETTE 16 NATIONAL DESCHUTES 3 Glacier Peak Wilderness – Sept. 3, 1964 (Wilderness Act) FOREST NATIONAL 4 Henry M.
    [Show full text]