Viewed the Thesis/Dissertation in Its Final Electronic Format and Certify That It Is an Accurate Copy of the Document Reviewed and Approved by the Committee

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Viewed the Thesis/Dissertation in Its Final Electronic Format and Certify That It Is an Accurate Copy of the Document Reviewed and Approved by the Committee U UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI Date: May 22, 2009 I, Donald Mouch , hereby submit this original work as part of the requirements for the degree of: Master in Architecture It is entitled: Magnifying the Interstice: exploring the dialogue between architecture's in-betweens Student Signature: Donald Mouch This work and its defense approved by: Committee Chair: John Hancock G. Thomas Bible Approval of the electronic document: I have reviewed the Thesis/Dissertation in its final electronic format and certify that it is an accurate copy of the document reviewed and approved by the committee. Committee Chair signature: John Hancock Magnifying the Interstice: exploring the dialogue between architecture’s in-betweens May 22, 2009 A thesis submitted to the Graduate School of the University of Cincinnati in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of: Master of Architecture in the School of Architecture and Interior Design of the College of Design, Architecture, Art and Planning by Donald Mouch Bachelor of Science in Architecture, University of Cincinnati, 2007 Committee Chairs: Professor John Hancock Professor G. Thomas Bible thesisabstract 1 • Donald Mouch, Analytic, 2008 The interstice is frequently disregarded as architecture’s remnant in-between space. Yet magnifying this zone of transition provides its own dialogue for spatial, experiential, and social interactions. The interstice can investigate architecture’s transitional spaces via form, time, site, and body. At the forefront of the interstitial is the relationship of form: interactions between solid and solid, and solid and void. Voids grown out of the relationships between neighboring solids carry the potential to be experienced as unique zones of transition. This thesis, then, explores breaking down a solid form so as to accentuate the interstitial voids as transitory experiences in our constant movement through architecture. Time also provides architecture with a unique opportunity to accentuate its interstice as the transition from old to new, or from night to day. Rather than simply existing as a line of inconsistency, the interstice provides a space, a zone at which time’s transitions become manifest. Another zone of transition arises between building and site. The transition from street to building should not exist as a single doorway, but rather as a progression through an extended series of spatial experiences. Finally, the interstice engages the body through sensorial change. Architecture has the potential to awaken the senses such that design becomes a phenomenological experience expressing meaning and generating a vivid sensory experience through its magnification. The intention of this thesis is to uncover and stress the importance of architecture’s leftover interstitial spaces. The energy present at the convergence of contrasting entities deserves spatial amplification and recognition. Within a mixed-use project designed for 5th and Elm in downtown Cincinnati, this thesis project emphasizes an exploration of architecture’s common interstices, the hallway, staircase, and threshold, resulting in a magnification of these components’ everydayness. iii tablecontents of vi Image Reference viii Chapter 0: Introduction: Defining the Interstice 12 As a Dialogue Chapter 1: Form: The Dialogue Between Solid/Void and Solid/Solid 22 Chapter 2: Time: The Dialogue Between Past/Present and Night/Day 36 Chapter 3: Site: The Convergence of Spatial Layers in an Urban Fabric 50 Chapter 4: Body: The Sequential Phenomena Associated with 60 Movement and the Senses Chapter 5: Site Description and Analysis 72 Chapter 6: Design Intention 80 Chapter 7: Bibliography 90 vii featuredimages viii Introduction 1. Lederberg, Dov. “Dialogue #8,” Dialogues & Anti-Logues – 2004/09, http://www.art.net/%7Evision/dov2J.html. Accessed 24 April 2009. 2. “Circulation & Movement.” Diagram provided by author. 3. “Functional Duality.” Diagram provided by author. 4. “Simple Complexity.” Diagram provided by author. 5. “Passive ‘Parallelism.” Diagram provided by author. 6. Woods, Lebbeus. “T-Knot,” T-Knot Chengdhu 2007, http://lebbeuswoods.net/. Accessed 24 April 2009. 7. Woods, Lebbeus. “Berlin Free-Zone 3-2.” New York Times, “An Architect Unshackled by Limits of Real World,” Nicolai Ouroussoff, http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/25/arts/design/25wood.html. Accessed 24 April 2009. 8. “Distorting Geometry.” Diagrams provided by author. Chapter 1: Form 1. Brychtova, Jaroslava et al. Spaces II, 1991-92. Image provided by author. 2. “Solid/Void.” Diagram provided by author. 3. “Solid/Solid.” Diagram provided by author. 4. “Smooth/Striated.” Image provided by author. 5. Eisenman Architects. “Guardiola House, 1988: Trace Diagrams.” Peter Eisenman, Written into the Void, 145. 6. Swiss Alps, Gimmelwald. Personal photograph by author. 31 July 2008. 7. Mangwanani. “Mid-Atlantic Range,” http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Mid_Atlantic_Ridge.jpg. Accessed 19 May 2009. 8. “Simmons Hall, MIT.” Image provided by Mary Carroll-Coelho. 9. “Simmons Hall, MIT.” Image provided by Mary Carroll-Coelho. 10. “Solid/Void Relationship.” Diagram provided by author. 11. Paul Warchol Photography. “Simmons Hall, MIT.” Hilary French, New Urban Housing, 114. 12. Lh1h1h7. “Lll_0016,” http://www.flickr.com/photos/liangh/140665766/sizes/l/. Accessed 21 April 2009. 13. Office for Metropolitan Architecture/Rem Koolhaas. “Jussieu Libraries.” Peter Eisenman, Ten Canonical Buildings 1950-2000, 206. 14. Office for Metropolitan Architecture/Rem Koolhaas. “Jussieu Libraries.” Peter Eisenman, Ten Canonical Buildings 1950-2000, 214. 15. Office for Metropolitan Architecture/Rem Koolhaas. “Jussieu Libraries.” Peter Eisenman, Ten Canonical Buildings 1950-2000, 215. 16. Delugan_Meissl. “Town House, Wimbergergasse.” Christian Muhr, “Delugan_Meissl: Housing and Office Block in Vienna,” A+U October 2002, 94. 17. Delugan_Meissl. “Town House, Wimbergergasse.” Hilary French, New Urban Housing, 76. 18. Spiluttini, Margherita. “Town House, Wimbergergasse.” Hilary French, New Urban Housing, 77. 19. Delugan_Meissl. “Town House, Wimbergergasse.” Christian Muhr, “Delugan_Meissl: Housing and Office Block in Vienna,” A+U October 2002, 93. ix Chapter 2: Time 1. Fuss, Adam. “Now!” Personal photograph by author. 21 October 2007. 2. Personal Photograph by author. 27 June 2007. 3. Dali, Salvador. “Montre Molle au Moment,” Easy Art, http://www.easyart.it/posters/Salvador-Dali/Montre-Molle- au-Moment-150203.html. Accessed 23 April 2009. 4. Aaa-fed. “Museo di Castelvecchio – Carlo Scarpa,” Flickr, http://www.flickr.com/photos/14173242@ N02/2066472850/. Accessed 11 February 2009. 5. Frahm, Klaus. Carlo Scarpa, 76. 6. Frahm, Klaus. Carlo Scarpa, 75. 7. Juergensen, Jochen. “museo di castelvecchio, verona-carlo scarpa,” Flickr, http://www.flickr.com/photos/ jochenjuergensen/2442344817/sizes/l/. Accessed 23 April 2009. 8. Aaa-fed. “Museo di Castelvecchio – Carlo Scarpa,” Flickr, http://www.flickr.com/photos/14173242@ N02/1810913710/. Accessed 23 April 2009. 9. Cesar, Robert. “Le Fresnoy.” Bernard Tschumi, Le Fresnoy: Architecture In/Between, 98. 10. Tschumi, Bernard. Le Fresnoy: Architecture In/Between, 59. 11. Mauss, Peter. “Le Fresnoy.” Bernard Tschumi, Le Fresnoy: Architecture In/Between, 140-41. 12. Richters, Christian. “Le Fresnoy.” Bernard Tschumi, Le Fresnoy: Architecture In/Between, 135. 13. Douglas. “Chapel of St. Ignatius, Seattle,” Flickr, http://www.flickr.com/photos/douglas/297097992/sizes/o/. Accessed 23 April 2009. 14. Elvis F. “Chapel of St. Ignatius,” Flickr, http://www.flickr.com/photos/fhke/3076001953/sizes/o/. Accessed 23 April 2009. 15. Elvis F. “Chapel of St. Ignatius by Steven Holl,” Flickr, http://www.flickr.com/photos/fhke/3128089896/sizes/o/. Accessed 23 April 2009. 16. Holl, Steven. “Chapel of St. Ignatius,” http://www.stevenholl.com/project-detail.php?id=40. Accessed 23 April 2009. Chapter 3: Site 1. Serra, Richard. “Clara Clara.” Personal photograph by the author. 27 August 2008. 2. Buytaert, Dries. “Random Alley,” http://www.buytaert.net/cache/images-vancouver-2004-vancouver-random-alley- 700x700.jpg. Accessed 25 April 2009. 3. Raine. “Marsh-Fence,” peekabooview.blogspot.com/ 2007/11/somenos.html. Accessed 25 April 2009. 4. Koho, Timo. Alvar Aalto - Urban Finland, 49. 5. Träskelin, Rauno. Villa Mairea: Alvar Aalto, 6. 6. Gross, David. “Villa Mairea,” Flickr, http://www.flickr.com/photos/adventurepixels/982159106/. Accessed 23 April 2009. 7. Träskelin, Rauno. Villa Mairea: Alvar Aalto, 20. 8. Träskelin, Rauno. Villa Mairea: Alvar Aalto, 26. 9. Perrault, Dominique. Dominique Perrault Architecture, 126. 10. “Horizontal Movement.” Diagram provided by author. 11. Leung, Chirstopher. “Submerged Building,” Flickr, http://www.flickr.com/photos/christopherleung/3030026286/ sizes/l/. Accessed 23 April 2009. 12. Richters, Christian. “EWHA Womans University.” Robert Ivy, “EWHA Womans University,” Architectural Record, November 2008, 155. x Chapter 4: Body 1. “Metal Mesh.” Personal Photograph by author. 28 August 2008. 2. “Hand.” Diagram provided by author. 3. Bayer, Herbert. The Lonely Metropolitan, https://blogs.warwick.ac.uk/zoebrigley/entry/_silence_and/, Accessed 26 April 2009. 4. Binet, Hélène. Peter Zumthor: Therme Vals. Peter Zumthor, Peter Zumthor: Therme Vals, 161. 5. “The Horizon of Meaning.” Diagram provided by author. 6. Holman, Cal. “Iron Bridge,” Flickr, http://www.flickr.com/photos/cal_holman/3098537269/, Accessed 23 April 2009. 7. Holl, Steven. “Stretto House,” http://www.stevenholl.com/project-detail.php?type=houses&id=26&page=1, Accessed 28 April 2009. 8. Diagram
Recommended publications
  • Navigator Core I
    CORE I NAVIGATOR GSAPP FALL 2015 5 STUDIO DECLARATIONS 1. We will work intensely and collaboratively. 2. Ideas must be valued and clearly represented. 3. High energy, open-mindedness and engagement with the wider world are prerequisites. 4. Constructive criticism and bold design responses constitute our communication. 5. Our creative palette includes the interconnection of complexity and simplicity, light and shadow, form and space, materiality and structure. EVENTS / EXCURSIONS - MATRIX 0% 50% 25% 75% PROPORTION PROCESS SYSTEM COMPOSITION TOPOGRAPHY TYPOLOGY CRISIS / FORM PARTI KINETIC HINGE 100% MODULE / PARAMETRIC EXCAVATION FIGURE GROUND MORPHOLOGY REPRESENTATION LIMIT MODEL-A-THON COLOUR/LIGHT/TIME CAMOUFLAGE 1.UNDER f d j MERGE / SUBMERGE d d h h e h e i 2. IN c b f THRESHOLDS, TRANSFORMATIONS, a a k p TRANSITIONS c o 3. ON g k b m TOPOGRAPHY, TYPOLOGY, MORPHOLOGY l 4. ABOVE n INTER-SECTION d a m k 5. BIKE DEPOT ROOF l p 6. SUBWAY ENTRANCE o e CUT, STAIR p a 7. PIER c j h b POINT, LINE, PLANE p k c c 8. BRIDGE A-SYMMETRY k 9. OVERPASS / UNDERPASS g i FIGURE GROUND m 10. PLATFORM e a. The Broken Kilometer, 393 W Broadway b b. Four Freedoms Park, Roosevelt Is. c. Cooper Hewitt : Heatherwick, 2 E 91st St g a d. Guggenheim : Doris Salcedo, 1071 5th Ave e. Abandoned Subway Station : City Hall, #6 train N f. Anthology of Film Archives, 32 2nd Ave g. Queens Museum : Moses Panorama, Flushing f h. Natural History Museum, Ctrl Park W & 79th i. The Earth Room, 141 Wooster St j.
    [Show full text]
  • OLMSTED TRACT; Torrance, California 2011 – 2013 SURVEY of HISTORIC RESOURCES
    OLMSTED TRACT; Torrance, California 2011 – 2013 SURVEY OF HISTORIC RESOURCES II. HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT A. Torrance and Garden City Movement: The plan for the original City of Torrance, known as the Olmsted Tract, owes its origins to a movement that begin in England in the late 19th Century. Sir Ebenezer Howard published his manifesto “Garden Cities of To-morrow" in 1898 where he describes a utopian city in which man lives harmoniously together with the rest of nature. The London suburbs of Letchworth Garden City and Welwyn Garden City were the first built examples of garden city planning and became a model for urban planners in America. In 1899 Ebenezer founded the Garden City Association to promote his idea for the Garden City ‘in which all the advantages of the most energetic town life would be secured in perfect combination with all the beauty and delight of the country.” His notions about the integration of nature with town planning had profound influence on the design of cities and the modern suburb in the 20th Century. Examples of Garden City Plans in America include: Forest Hills Gardens, New York (by Fredrick Law Olmsted Jr.); Radburn, New Jersey; Shaker Heights, Ohio; Baldwin Hills Village, in Los Angeles, California and Greenbelt, Maryland. Fredrick Law Olmsted is considered to be the father of the landscape architecture profession in America. He had two sons that inherited his legacy and firm. They practiced as the Olmsted Brothers of Brookline Massachusetts. Fredrick Law Olmsted Junior was a founding member of The National Planning Institute of America and was its President from 1910 to 1919.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of the American Institute of ARCH Itecr·S
    Journal of The American Institute of ARCH ITEcr·s PETEil HARRISON November, 1946 Fellowship Honors in The A.I.A. Examinations in Paris-I Architectural Immunity Honoring Louis Sullivan An Editorial by J. Frazer Smith The Dismal Fate of Christopher Renfrew What and Why Is an Industrial Designer? 3Sc PUBLISHED MONTHLY AT THE OCTAGON, WASHINGTON, D. C. UNiVERSITY OF ILLINOJS SMALL HOM ES COUNCIL MUMFORD ~O U SE "JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS NOVEMBER, 1946 VoL. VI, No. 5 Contents Fellowship Honors in The Ameri- Architectural Immunity 225 can Institute of Architects .... 195 By Daniel Paul Higgins By Edgar I. Williams, F.A.I.A. News of the Chapters and Other Honors . 199 Organizations . 228 Examinations in Paris-I .... 200 The Producers' Council. 231 By Huger Elliott The Dismal Fate of Christopher Architects Read and Write: Renfrew . 206 By Robert W. Schmertz "Organic Architecture" . 232 By William G. Purcell Honoring Louis Sullivan By Charles D. Maginnis, Advertising for Architects. 233 F.A.I.A. 208 By 0. H. Murray By William W. Wurster . 209 A Displaced Architect without Chapters of The A.I.A. 213 Documents . 233 By ]. Frazer Smith By Pian Drimmalen What and Why Is an Industrial News of the Educational Field. 234 Designer?. 217 By Philip McConnell The Editor's Asides . 236 ILLUSTRATIONS Tablet marking birth site of Louis H. Sullivan in Boston .. 211 Fur Shop in the Jay Jacob Store, Seattle, Wash .......... 212 George W. Stoddard and Associates, architects Remodeled Country House of Col. Henry W . Anderson, Dinwiddie Co., Va. 221 Duncan Lee, architect Do you know this building? ......
    [Show full text]
  • San Andreas: Architecture for the Fault
    CourseNo: ARCHA4104_003_2013_1 Instructor Information: Geoffrey M Manaugh Nicola Ann Twilley ADV STUDIO IV - TUTORIAL: San Andreas: Architecture for the Fault Image: Lebbeus Woods, from San Francisco Project: Inhabiting the Quake, Quake City, 1995 Course: GSAPP Advanced Studio IV, Spring 2013 Instructor: Geoff Manaugh | [email protected] Schedule: Monday/Wednesday, 2-6pm Tutorial; Friday, 2-6pm Research & Work The San Andreas Fault is an 800-mile tectonic feature cutting diagonally across the state of California, from the coastal spit of Cape Mendocino, roughly 200 miles north of San Francisco, to the desert shores of the Salton Sea near the U.S./Mexico border. Described by geologists as a “transform fault,” the San Andreas marks a stark and exposed division between the North American and Pacific Plates. It is a landscape on the move—“one of the least stable parts of the Earth,” in the words of paleontologist Richard Fortey. Seismologists estimate that, in only one million years’ time, the two opposing sides of the fault will have slid past one another to the extent of physically sealing closed the entrance to San Francisco Bay, while, at the other end of the state, Los Angeles will be dragged more than 15 miles north of its present position. Then another million years will pass—and another, and another—violently and irreversibly distorting Californian geography, with the San Andreas as a permanent, sliding scar. In some places, the fault is a picturesque landscape of rolling hills and ridges; in others, it takes the form of a broad valley, marked by quiet streams, ponds, and reservoirs; in yet others, it is not visible at all, hidden beneath the rocks and vegetation.
    [Show full text]
  • Faith Reforming
    Reforming Faith by Design Frank Furness’ Architecture and Spiritual Pluralism among Philadelphia’s Jews and Unitarians Matthew F. Singer Philadelphia never saw anything like it. The strange structure took shape between 1868 and 1871 on the southeast corner of North Broad and Mount Vernon streets, in the middle of a developing residential neighborhood for a newly rising upper middle class. With it came a rather alien addition to the city’s skyline: a boldly striped onion dome capping an octagonal Moorish-style minaret that flared outward as it rose skyward. Moorish horseshoe arches crowned three front entrances. The massive central At North Broad and Mount Vernon streets, Rodeph Shalom’s first purpose-built temple—de- doorway was topped with a steep gable signed by Frank Furness—announced the growing presence and aspirations of the newly developed neighborhood’s prospering German Jewish community. beneath a Gothic rose window that, in HISTORICAL SOCIETY OF PENNSYLVANIA turn, sat within another Moorish horse- shoe. Composed of alternating bands of phia. In a city of red-brick rowhouses built full Jewish emancipation and equality and yellow and red sandstone, the arches’ halo- primarily in neoclassical styles, Rodeph sparked new spasms of anti-Semitism. like tops appeared to radiate from central Shalom’s new temple mixed Islamic, Pedestrians gazing upon Rodeph disks incised with abstracted floral shapes. Byzantine and Gothic elements. Shalom may have wondered whether their Buttresses shored the sides of the building, Founded in 1795 as the first Ashkenazi wandering minds conjured an appari- which stood tall and vertical like a Gothic (Central and Eastern European) Jewish tion from a faraway time and place.
    [Show full text]
  • Architectural Styles/Types
    Architectural Findings Summary of Architectural Trends 1940‐70 National architectural trends are evident within the survey area. The breakdown of mid‐20th‐ century styles and building types in the Architectural Findings section gives more detail about the Dayton metropolitan area’s built environment and its place within national architectural developments. In American Architecture: An Illustrated Encyclopedia, Cyril Harris defines Modern architecture as “A loosely applied term, used since the late 19th century, for buildings, in any of number of styles, in which emphasis in design is placed on functionalism, rationalism, and up‐to‐date methods of construction; in contrast with architectural styles based on historical precedents and traditional ways of building. Often includes Art Deco, Art Moderne, Bauhaus, Contemporary style, International Style, Organic architecture, and Streamline Moderne.” (Harris 217) The debate over traditional styles versus those without historic precedent had been occurring within the architectural community since the late 19th century when Louis Sullivan declared that form should follow function and Frank Lloyd Wright argued for a purely American expression of design that eschewed European influence. In 1940, as America was about to enter the middle decades of the 20th century, architects battled over the merits of traditional versus modern design. Both the traditional Period Revival, or conservative styles, and the early 20th‐century Modern styles lingered into the 1940s. Period revival styles, popular for decades, could still be found on commercial, governmental, institutional, and residential buildings. Among these styles were the Colonial Revival and its multiple variations, the Tudor Revival, and the Neo‐Classical Revival. As the century progressed, the Colonial Revival in particular would remain popular, used as ornament for Cape Cod and Ranch houses, apartment buildings, and commercial buildings.
    [Show full text]
  • To Center City: the Evolution of the Neighborhood of the Historicalsociety of Pennsylvania
    From "Frontier"to Center City: The Evolution of the Neighborhood of the HistoricalSociety of Pennsylvania THE HISToRICAL SOcIETY OF PENNSYLVANIA found its permanent home at 13th and Locust Streets in Philadelphia nearly 120 years ago. Prior to that time it had found temporary asylum in neighborhoods to the east, most in close proximity to the homes of its members, near landmarks such as the Old State House, and often within the bosom of such venerable organizations as the American Philosophical Society and the Athenaeum of Philadelphia. As its collections grew, however, HSP sought ever larger quarters and, inevitably, moved westward.' Its last temporary home was the so-called Picture House on the grounds of the Pennsylvania Hospital in the 800 block of Spruce Street. Constructed in 1816-17 to exhibit Benjamin West's large painting, Christ Healing the Sick, the building was leased to the Society for ten years. The Society needed not only to renovate the building for its own purposes but was required by a city ordinance to modify the existing structure to permit the widening of the street. Research by Jeffrey A. Cohen concludes that the Picture House's Gothic facade was the work of Philadelphia carpenter Samuel Webb. Its pointed windows and crenellations might have seemed appropriate to the Gothic darkness of the West painting, but West himself characterized the building as a "misapplication of Gothic Architecture to a Place where the Refinement of Science is to be inculcated, and which, in my humble opinion ought to have been founded on those dear and self-evident Principles adopted by the Greeks." Though West went so far as to make plans for 'The early history of the Historical Soiety of Pennsylvania is summarized in J.Thomas Scharf and Thompson Westcott, Hisiory ofPhiladelphia; 1609-1884 (2vols., Philadelphia, 1884), 2:1219-22.
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Registration Form
    NFS Form 10-900 __ OMB No. 1024-0018 (Rev. 10-90) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES REGISTRATION FORM This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties dnd^Tt^^^j^ul^RtfcfiSinl^fl'itli iw li iT*i nn| ill h the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form (National Register Bulletin 16A). Complete each itarr ry r^itftfft'Tii 111 ' Hl'iTp'rht" h™ or by entering the information requested. If any item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for TOl1 applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional entries and narrative items on continuation sheets (NPS Form 10-900a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer, to complete all items. 1. Name of Property__________________________________________________________ historic name Foord & Massev Furniture Company Building___________________________________________ other names/site number CRS# N-7590____________________________ 2. Location street & number 701 N. Shiolev Street_______________________ not for publication N/A city or town Wilmington_________________ vicinity N/A state Delaware________ code DE county New Castle____ code 003 zip code 19801 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1986, as amended, I hereby certify that this \X^ nomination __ request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property y meets __ does not meet the National Register Criteria.
    [Show full text]
  • THE WILMINGTON TRAIN STATION an the Railbed Has Three the ARCHITECT Tracks
    1907 100th Anniversary 2007 THE WILMINGTON TRAIN STATION AN The railbed has three THE ARCHITECT tracks. Two are used mainly ENGINEERING for Amtrak, the other for Frank Furness, who was born in Philadelphia Train SEPTA’s local service. in 1839, studied architecture by working with pro- MARVEL level fessional architects in Philadelphia and New York. The Wilmington Station is When the Civil War unique in that the rail bed that broke out in 1861, Fur- carries the trains through the ness (pronounced like station is above the lobby. Most furnace) joined the rchitectural em train stations are built with the train 6th Pennsylvania An A G level as a walk-down, not a walk-up. This Volunteer Cavalry. required the architect, Frank Furness, to As an officer, he Designed by Frank Furness in the Gothic A DISTINCTIVE LOOK design supports strong enough to hold the was noted for his The station has the characteristic bold incredible weight. courage and dar- Romanesque Revival style, the station’s unique Frank Furness look of fiery red He accomplished this by using 28 steel ing. At the Battle brick with arched windows and columns that support the iron crossbeams. of Trevilian Sta- elegant terra-cotta adornments. They continue from the train level though tion in Virginia in structure and historical significance are a city treasure Terra cotta is a masonry the lobby floor and are anchored by 1864, an outpost of building material popular in the huge concrete pyramids. Ron his company was United States from the late 19th Edwards, Amtrak’s district Closed area cut off and running By RICK MULROONEY The arched century until the 1930s and is still manager for the Wilmington The station’s out of ammunition, The News Journal windows are a common material found in city Station, says the old waiting construction is strong so he volunteered to Romanesque buildings.
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Nomination
    JAN 1 6 2013 NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 (EK ~ires 5131 /2012) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service I\ d ) II I I National Register of Historic Place• Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. See instructions InN ational Register Bulletin, How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Fonn. If any item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "NIA" for "not applicable." For functions, architectu ral classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and .subcategories from the instructions. Place additional certification comments, entries, and narrative items on continuation sheets if needed (NPS Form 10-900a). 1. Name of Property historic name Keokuk Union Depot other names/site number ..::C::...B=&-=Q:..:D=.e.::Jp<:.Co::..:t:......_ _ _________________________ 2. Location street & number 200 Exchange Street ~ not for publication city or town ..:.K.::e:.:o:.:k.:.:u:.:.k:..._ _______________________ ~vicinity Iowa code lA county Lee code 111 zip code 52632 state ~~---------- ~~~------- 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, I hereby certify that this _L nomination _ request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property _lL_ meets __ does not meet the National Register Criteria. I recommend that this property be considered significant at the following level(s) of significance: X local ~~~~u?~O ~-~~yh~~~3 ____ _ ~~w~~:&M_ SOCICTY OF IOWA v-z.
    [Show full text]
  • Lines Not Splines VISUAL STUDIES: Fall 2019 Professor : Christoph A
    GSAPP Columbia University Lines not Splines VISUAL STUDIES: Fall 2019 Professor : Christoph a. Kumpusch, PhD THURSDAYS 7-9pm, 505 Avery Session A/ Session B LINES NOT SPLINES “Drawing is not the form; it is the way of seeing the form.” 1 "To draw does not simply mean to reproduce contours; the drawing does not simply consist in the idea: the drawing is even the expression, the interior form, the plan, the model. Look what remains after that!" 2 FOCUS This intensive workshop‐formatted course is rooted in three propositions: that and GOAL drawing is as much a way of seeing as it is a means of representation; that > drawing is not bound to digital versus analog categorizations; and that drawing remains the primary vehicle to record, communicate and create architecture. We will review the “Top Twenty Great Architectural Drawings” as a series of case studies linked to a film project on the drawing process. We will attempt drawings of one line and drawings of 1,000 lines in the same spans of time. We will draw what we see, what we cannot see, what we want and what we wish we could achieve. The word “rendering” will have NO place in this seminar. A series of readings will augment class assignments and discussions. Students are expected to surrender their typical drawing habits in favor of a rigorous drawing routine which will challenge notions of style, assumptions about “start” and “finish,” ideas about surface, shadow and scale. Diverse media will be deployed, subjects will include studio work, urban fragments, body parts and inward visions.
    [Show full text]
  • A Historical Bibliography of Commercial Architecture in the United States
    A HISTORICAL BIBLIOGRAPHY OF COMMERCIAL ARCHITECTURE IN THE UNITED STATES Compiled by Richard Longstreth, 2002; last revised 7 May 2019 I have focused on historical accounts giving substantive coverage of the commercial building types that traditionally distinguish city and town centers, outlying business districts, and roadside development. These types include financial institutions, hotels and motels, office buildings, restaurants, retail and wholesale facilities, and theaters. Buildings devoted primarily to manufacturing and other forms of production, transportation, and storage are not included. Citations of writings devoted to the work of an architect or firm and to the buildings of a community are limited to a few of the most important relative to this topic. For purposes of convenience, listings are divided into the following categories: Banks; Hotels-Motels; Office Buildings; Restaurants; Taverns, etc.; Retail and Wholesale Buildings; Roadside Buildings, Miscellaneous; Theaters; Architecture and Place; Urbanism; Architects; Materials-Technology; and Miscellaneous. Most accounts are scholarly in nature, but I have included some popular accounts that are particularly rich in the historical material presented. Any additions or corrections are welcome and will be included in updated editions of this bibliography. Please send them to me at [email protected]. B A N K S Andrew, Deborah, "Bank Buildings in Nineteenth-Century Philadelphia," in William Cutler, III, and Howard Gillette, eds., The Divided Metropolis: Social and Spatial Dimensions
    [Show full text]