482 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD- HOUSE January 20 eoncerning the speech by Sena:t;or GoRE, I investigated by AEC engineers, has been dis­ record, and the· plant has been located at promised to send you a factual account of cussed by them with representatives of the what the Corps of Engineers feel 1s a safe the incident to which he referred. Corps of Engineers' office, Memphis district. place." The Washington Daily News on Friday They concluded, after reviewing all available In this quotation, an obvious slip of the published an article which was advertised data, that the site selected by MVGC is tongue was recognized as such by all except by a front page headline in its early issue adequately protected from Mississippi River one or two of the fifty-six reporters present ..How Admiral Strauss Doctored History." floods by the Corps of Engineers project since in reporting the news conference they This article, in disregard of the facts, alleged levee." naturally relied on the prepared statement. that I caused the transcript of a news con­ · The precise and factual account of the I left town following the news conference ference which I held on December 17 to be role of the Corps of Engineers was given to but in my absence the Public Information falsified for some improper reason. I am the reporters not only in my formal state­ Division of the Commission corrected the informed the headline was withdrawn in ment but also in two of the supplemental stenographic transcript for grammatical later editions. documents which accompanied the state­ errors, et cetera, and in the course of this The news conference was called for the ment: ( 1) a reproduction of a drawing of process the transcript was conformed to the purpose of explaining, in an orderly, detailed, the site which carried an inserted legend of text of the formal statement. This was comprehensive manner, the origin and pro­ explanation, and (2) a statement as to the . done in order to eliminate anything that visions of the Mississippi Valley Generating manner in which the site was selected, in­ might appear to be a contradiction. Any Co. contract in order to put into proper per­ cluding discussions which were held among person speaking ad libitum, whether he be spective the misunderstandings which have AEC engineers, engineers of the sponsoring a Member of Congress, a witness before a been current concerning it. Each reporter companies, and the Corps of Engineers. committee, or a person ·conducting a news who entered the conference room was given After the 56 reporters attending the conference, is entitled to the assurance that a formal, written statement of 36 pages, bear­ conference had received my formal state­ the intent of his statements will be clearly ing my name; also reproductions of the ment, I turned to a large reproduction of reflected in a simultaneously presented charts, graphs, and tabulations dealing with the site drawing which had been affixed to written record. the subject which were exhibited during the the wall ar.d mentioned again how the site These facts as I have state · ~ . them were conference. had been chosen but this was only a pass­ ignored in the newspaper articl-e and which In my formal statement, pages 10 and 11, ing reference, ad lib, since the subject had purported to show that I had "doctored his­ I discussed the manner in which the site at been covered thoroughly in the formal state- tory," presumably for some insidious rea­ West Memphis, Ark., was selected and stated: ment. · sons. There was no word in the article "The Corps of Engineers has reviewed the The ad lib quotation was as follows: about my formal 36-page statement, which plot plan showing the proposed construction "The Corps of Engineers and the engi­ is factually accurate to the best of my and made certain suggestions, all of which we neers retained by sponsoring companies knowledge and belief. are assured will be complied with in the final have examined some 16 sites O'l the river and I may be unduly sensitive but it seems plans and specifications. They also have have selected this as the preferable one. to me that this whole incident has very stated that the proposed construction ap­ This elevation here shows the maximum little to do with the merits of the contro­ pears to be acceptable to the Mississippi River flood record in the river, the 1937 flood. I versy over the contract. Commission from the standpoint of naviga­ understand that records have been made Faithfully yours, tion and flood control. The site also has been since 1880 or thereabouts, some 74 years of LEwiS L. STRAUSS.

The Journal of the proceedings of act to amend section 7237 of the Internal HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES Monday, January 17, 1955, was read and Revenue Code of 1954." approved. RespectfUlly yours, THURSDAY, JANUARY 20, 1955 _ RALPH R. ROBERTS, The House met at 12 o'clock noon. MESSAGE FROM THE· PRESIDENT Clerk of the House of Representatives. Archbishop John Theodorovich, met­ A message in writing from the Presi­ ropolitan of the Ukrainian Orthodox dent of. the United States was communi­ Church of the United states, offered the cated to the House by Mr. Miller, one of ENROLLED BILLS SIGNED following prayer: his secretaries. Mr. BURLESON, from the Committee In the name of the Father, the Son, on House Administration, reported that that committee had examined and found and the Holy Ghost, let us pray. MESSAGES FROM THE SENATE Almighty God, Thou art father of all truly enrolled a bill of the House of the nations, the source of the mighty stream The SPEAKER laid before the House following title: of life in which the forward fiow is hu­ the following communications from the H. R. 2369. An act to amend section 7237 of manity. Thou gavest to our Nation to Clerk of the House of Representatives: the Internal Revenue Code of 1954. become a mighty wave in the stream of JANUARY 20, 1955. The SPEAKER. The Chair desires to humanity. Grant us, our Father, to re­ The Honorable the SPEAKER, House of Representatives. announce that pursuant to the authority member we are a hope for many en­ Sm: Pursuant to authority granted on .granted him on Monday, January 17. gulfed with the waves of oppression. January 17, 1955, the Clerk received from the 1955, he did on January 18, 1955, sign the There are the enslavers of the nations Secretary of the Senate on January 19, 1955, following enrolled bill o~ the House: hiding the shame of slavery in our time the following messages: H. R. 2369. An act to amend section 7237 That the Senate has passed with amend­ behind the iron curtains. of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954~ Have mercy, 0 Lord, on these victims ments the bill H. R. 2091, entitled "An act of mass execution, exile, slave camps, making appropriations for the fiscal year And the following enrolled joint reso­ starvation. Have mercy on Thy minis­ ending June 30, 1955, and for other pur­ lution of the Senate: poses"; and· ters, tortured and killed for Thy name's That the Senate insists upon its amend­ S. J. Res. 4. Joint resolution to provide for sake. Grant the nations crushed under ments to the bill H. R. 2091 and requests a the continuation in office of certain members the tyrant's heel the blessings of liberty, conference with the House of Representatives of the Commission on Governmental Opera­ independence, and national statehood. on the disagreeing votes of the two Houses tions. Give our great Nation the 'strength thereon, and appointed Mr. HAYDEN, Mr. and courage to keep bright the beacon RUSSELL, Mr. CHAVEZ, Mr. BRIDGES, and Mr, SALTONSTALL, conferees on the part of the JOINT COMMITTEE ON THE of liberty and justice. Give·us the wis­ ECONOMIC REPORT dom to help our brothers in Ukraine and Senate. all the other suppressed nations striving Respectfully yours, . The SPEAKER. Pursuant to the pro­ RALPH R. ROBERTS, visions of title 15, section 1024, United for freedom and national independence. Clerk of the House of Representatives. May the day come, 0 God, when all States Code, the Chair appoints as mem­ nations and peoples shall live in a true JANUARY 18, 1955. bers of the Joint Committee on the Eco­ state of coexistence devoid of iron cur­ The Honorable the SPEAKER, nomic Report the following members on tains and tyrants and slavery. And grant House of Representatives. the part of the House: Mr. PATMAN of that all men may live in their own lands Sm: Pursuant to authority granted on Texas, Mr. BoLLING of Missouri, Mr. in liberty and independence under their January 17, 1955, the Clerk received from the Secretary of the Senate on January 18, 1955, MILLS of Arkansas, Mr. KELLEY of own governments in Thy ways and ac­ the following message: , Pennsylvania, Mr. WoLcoTT of Michigan, cording to Thy will. That the Senate has passed without Mr. TALLE of Iowa, and Mr. CURTIS of May Thy kingdom come. Amen. amendment the bill H. R. 2369, entitled "An Missouri. J9-s5 · CONGRESSIONAL RECORD'-- HOUSE 483 E"CONOMIC REPORT-MESSAGE The role of the Federal Government was to take actions that created confi­ FROM THE PRESIDENT OF THE in the achievement of these goals is to dence in the future and stimulated busi­ UNITED STATES

' Number of empl~yees in non- Percentage Number of employees in non- Percentage agricultural industries (in of employees ~ff:' .. agricultural industries (in o{ employees thousands) in nonagri- thousands) in nonagri- 50 in- cultural es- 50 in- cultural es.- dus- tabllshments dus- tablisbments Indus~ try Dependent upon dependent Industry try Dependent upon dependent r-o exports upon exports .. 1-0 -exports upon exports codest Total cod est Total Total Di- Indl- Di- Di- Indi- Di- rectly rectly Total rectly Total rectly rectly Total rectly ------TotaL------~--- .. ----- 37,413.4 22,526.6 1,322.4 1, 204.2 6.8 3.5 Agricultural, mining, and con------struction machinery------20 293.6 57.5 50.5 7.0 19.6 17.2 Food and kindred products •• .: •• 2 1, 583.9 95.0 64.9 30.1 6.0 4.1 Metalworking machinery ______21 248.3 41.0 27.8 13.2 16.5 · 11.2 Tobacco manufacturers ..•••••••• 3 104.0 12.6 8. 5 4.1 12.1 8.2 Other machinery except elec- Textile-mill products .••••••••••• .4 1, 050.8 153.8 100. 8 53.0 14.5 9. 5 trlcaL ______------__ 22 1, 019.2 140.6 97.8 42.8 13.8 9.6 AppareL.------_------5 1,396. 0 44, 7 . 32.1 12.6 3.2 2.3 Motors and generators ______23 128.9 21.1 10.0 11.1 16.4 7.8 Lumber and wood products _____ 6 838. 3 57.8 23.4 34.4 6.9 2.8 Radios. ___ _-- ---. ______------24 201.0 . 18.9 13. "5 5.4 9.4 6. 7 Furniture and fixtures ______7 340.0 8.5 4.1 4.4 2.5 1.2 Other electrical machinery __.• : . 25 598. 7 52.1 25.7 26.4 8. 7 4.3 Paper and allied products ______8 464.8 44.6 9. 3 35. 3 9.6 2.0 Motor vehicles ______26 776.2 90. 0 55.9 34.1 11.6 7.2 Printing.and publishing ______9 747.2 44.8 8.2 3fi. 6 6.0 1.1 Other transportation equipment. 27 489.8 57.3 39.7 17.6 11.7 8.1 Chemicals ______------10 694.6 91.0 40. 3 50. 7 13. 1 5. 8 Professional and scientific equip- Products of petroleum and coal. 11 397.1 52.8 19.8 33.0 13.3 5.0 ment______------28 264.9 32.1 23.6 - 8.5 12.1 8.9 Rubber prqducts .•. ~------12 270.4 31.9 16.2 15.7 11.8 6.0 Miscellaneous manufacturing ____ 29 460.6 32.7 18.9 13.8 7.1 4.1 Leather and leather products ____ 13 408.5 18.0 9.0 9.0 4. 4 2.2 Coal, gas, and electric power •••• 30 916.1 87.9 35. . 7 52.2 9.6 3.9 Stone, clay, and glass products .. 14 598. 8 55.1 25.2 29.9 9.2 4. 2 Railroad transportation.------31 1, 530.1 172.9 90. 3 82.6 11.3 5.9 Iron and stooL------15 964.5 160.1 47.2 112.9 16.6 4.9 Ocean transportation______32 220. 9 148.2 . 129.2 19.0 67.1 58.5 Nonferrous metals ______16 338.0 47. 0 9.1 37.9 13.9 2. 7 Other transportation ______33 1, 201.9 88. 9 38.4 50.5 7. 4 3.2 Plumbing and beating supplies. 17 171.1 6. 7 4.1 2.6 3.9 2.4 Trade ______------34 6, 984.8 265.4 167.6 97.8 3. 8 2.4 Fabricated structural metal Communications .• __------____ -- 35 619.8 26.0 7.4 18.6 4.2 1.2 products. __ ------18 205.6 10.5 6. 0 4. 5 5.1 2.9 Other nonmanufacturing indus- Other fabricated metal products. 19 616.9 70.9 26.5 44.4 11.5 4.3 tries------36--44 10,258.1 188.2 35.7 152.5 1.8 ~3 I 1 The industry classifications indicated in this table do not necessarily coincide State and local government. A minor difference also results from the use of revised -with those for which BLS employment data are regularly published. data not as yet reflected in the published BLS total of nonfarm employment for 1947. 2 The total of nonagricultural employment presented in this table differs from the J)ublished total owing primarily to the exclusion of construction and Federal and Source: U. S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Division of Interindustry Economics, Nov. 5, 1952.

It is obvious that unless our trade poli­ Number of workers producing goods eq1tivalent to increases in annual imports after temporary cy permits exporting countries abroad tariff suspension to earn the necessary dollars they will [Based on estimated increases in imports in event of tariff suspension, by Howard S. Piquet in Aid, Trade and the be unable to buy the products of our ex­ Tariff] . port industries and the jobs of these people will be in jeopardy. Number of workers producing goods equivalent to- I'BOGBESSIVJ: TRADE POLICY ADVANTAGEOUS TO THE UNITED STATES Estimated minimum import Estimated maximum import What is even more significant is that, increases increases on balance, American competitive in­ Types of import increases in case of tariff genuity easily competes in the world suspension and area of employment Employed in- Employed in- market in many fields. It is clearly to our advantage to have expanded foreign Total Nonagrl- Agricul- Total Nonagrl- Agricul· cultural tural in· cultural tural in· trade since it will redound to the overall industries dustries 1 industries dustries 1 economic advantage of the United States. This may sound like having your cake and eating it too but it seems to me that A. All commodities •••••••••••••••••••••••• 189,090 57,360 131,730 404,990 135,040 269,950 the arguments for a progressive trade 1. Direct employment •••••••••••••• 109,040 40,060 68,980 237,820 97,540 140,280 80,050 17,300 policy lead tQ that conclusion. lt is 2. Indirect employment'------62,750 167,170 37,500 129,670 clearly to our national interest in terms B. Commodities in "area of maximum of the political situation in the world to­ import competition".------121,210 36,770 84,440 255,550 85,210 170,340 day to be the leader in trade policy as 1. Direct employment.••••••••••••• 69,900 25,680 44,220 150,070 61,550 88,520 well as in political and military policy. 2. Indirect employment. ••••••••••. 51,310 11,090 40,220 105, 480 23,660 81,820 It seems equally obvious to me that we 0. Commodities which would be likely to cause some displacement of domestic stand to gain more by a wide margin 96,240 than we stand to lose with a progressive goods - ----~------23,870 72,370 202,650 57,640 145,010 trade policy. As with England in the 1. Direct employment•••••••••••••• 59,660 18,280 41,380 127,730 44,960 82,770 19th century a liberal trade policy will 2. Indirect employment. ••••••••••. 36,580 5, 590 30,990 74,920 12,680 62,240 clearly aid in the growth of the Ameri­ 1 Agricultural employment figures are based upon Bureau of Agricultural Economics data. can economy to a very significant de­ 2 Includes estimates of offsetting employment in ocean transportation and insurance arising from assumed import gree. increases. Turning to the other side of the coin Source: U. S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Branch of Interindustry Economics. there are those people and industries who would be affected by any lowering It is therefore obvious that a gradual pie and the industries rapidly readjust of tariffs. The most accurate statistics program of liberalizing trade barriers to more competitive lines. Certainly, available in the staff papers of the Ran­ would have an adverse effect on a very the benefiting industries would pick up dall Commission illustrate that the num­ small number of people in the United much of the slack. However, we do rec­ ber of workers dependent on tariff pro­ States, while at the same time benefit­ ognize that people have gone into the tection is much smaller than those work­ ing a great many more people. How­ protected industries in good faith based ers who depend upon exports. Based on ever, the problem of adjustment would upon the assumption that continued the hypothesis that all tariffs would be affect a selected number of industries taritf protection would be afforded them. temporarily suspended, the Bureau of and the workers in them. Xherefore, if we are to arrive at a na­ Labor Statistics estimated that approxi­ GOVERNMENT ASSISTANCE NECESSARY FOR tional policy which benefits the vast ma­ mately 200,000 persons would be adverse­ READJUSTMENT jority but which will have some tempo­ ly affected. This is on the assumption Thus, it appears to me that in jus­ rary adverse effects on a small minority, that all tariffs would be suspended which, tice-since this is a decision of the Fed­ the Federal Government has a responsi­ of course, is a drastic position which is eral Government-the Federal Govern.. bility to assure readjustment of the being advocated by no one. ment should be concerned that the peo- select minority. CONGRESSIONAL REC6R.O ~HOUSE 499 ·. ~ With · this r in · mind, i: have inttoduced· -occur eventUall:f even in' the'' al5senc~ of could economically-be located· in these· areas a trade-adjustment bill. This bill would such assistance. It is· neither compen­ and still meet their own production and aid ind~tries--presentlY affected by our sation nor subsidy legislation. · It would marketing requirements, the problem of un­ tari11 employment from import competition would policy, as well as those which might make easier the adjustments that would be largely solved. be affected in the future. It seems to occur in the absence of Government as­ Carrying out a program of this kind under me that even .those who. disagree with sistance. At present, the same decisions private auspices might be done through an the proposition I have asserted regard­ by the President leave affected industries industrial development corporation, fash­ ing gradua.l liberalization of trade bar­ completely on their own. ioned after the ·community and State in­ riers will agree that this bill, in itself, The bill would provide for technical dustrial development corporations but oper­ is. neutral on the trade question. Re­ assistance to companies and communi­ ating on a national seale. The more that gardless of what we do on the tariff issue, ties needing it. Such assistance would private industry can utilize the skills of we all can support this trade-adjustment be directed toward the diversification of j;hese displaced workers through other means bill to aid those presently affected by output into products less vulnerable to the smaller the task left to the Government. our trade policy.- import competition than those that they Employees of industries and compa­ This bill is not in any sense of the have been producing. Federal funds nies .found eligible for assistance under word a compen.sation bill. It would not would be used to provide consulting en­ the program outlined in this bill would authorize compensation to either capital gineers, market researchers, and other be made eligible for extended unemploy­ or labor for losses incurred because of technicians whose services might prove ment compensation assistance. Such as_. import competition. What it seeks to helpful. This responsibility would be sistance would be administered through accomplish is facilitation of the neces­ assigned to the Department of Com­ our present Federal-State machinery; sary adjustments that increased im­ merce. but the added assistance would be ports in a few cases have made or might The same sort of assistance would be financed by Federal funds. The bill pro­ in the future make necessary. Such ad­ made available to communities. Export vides that benefits in cases where ad­ justments are, and would be, negligible industries might be encouraged to estab­ justment to increased imports is involved in comparison with the economy as a lish l>ranch plants in communities that should be extended from the present whole, and, in the aggregate, would cost are particularly vulnerable to import maximum of 26 weeks to a maximum of very little. competition. In the case of communi­ 52 weeks. WHAT THE BILL WOULD DO ties, one objective would be to encourage · Counseling and placement and special the broadening ·of the economic base in The bill introduced by: Senator KEN­ training allowances would also be ·pro­ order to provide as wide a variety of jobs vided for, together with special moving NEDY and myself would not provide for the establishment of any new Govern­ as possible for the population. allowances. Older workers who are un­ ment bureau or agency. It would estab­ In some cases supplementary financ­ employable would become eligible for re­ lish an ad hoc Adjustment Assistance ing might be necessary. In a number of tirement at age 60 rather than at age 65, Board consisting of representatives of States privately financed industrial de­ as at present, without prejudice to their interested Government departments. velopment corporations have been estab­ rights at the regular retirement age. . The new Board would not duplicate the· lished, and these could be helpful in Statements made by-other members of functions of the Tariff Commission or this connection. One function of the the Randall Commission regarding the any other Government body. It would Adjustment Assistance Board would be proposals of Mr. MacDonald indicate .assume responsibility only after the to facilitate the establishment and func­ that there is keen interest in this ap­ President found it necessary, in the na .. tioning of such corporations or similar proach to the problem. Some members tiona! interest, not to accept :findings of private bodies. In cases where financing indicated that, although they are in favor injury by the Tariff Commission but to by such means is not forthcoming, the of the general idea, they did not see how continue the duties in question in effect. Small Business Administration Act would it could be applied with regard to adjust­ Furthermore, the Board would be au­ be amended to permit larger loans for ments made necessary by increased im­ thorized to invoke the provisions of the this purpose, if necessary. ports while not being available also to act only after the President directed it to Companies found eligible for assist­ assist in making adjustments necessi· do so. If the President thought it best, ance would also have the privilege of tated by other actions of Government. he could decide not to invoke it and allow accelerated tax amortization on new I can see some reason for such hesi .. the industry and the workers concerned plant and equipment for the purpose of tancy. But does it follow that because to make whatever adjustments are neces­ introducing new products or expanding there are other cases than those caused sary without Government assistance. production in lines other than those by increased imports that are in need He could, of course, choose to follow the affected by tariff changes. of assistance that we should not concen­ recommendations of the Tariff Commis­ These proposals follow, in many re­ trate at this time upon the one currently sion and increase the rate of duty or im­ spects, the recommendations made by before us? It seems to me that rather pose a quota in order to prevent injury, Mr. David MacDonald in his statement than holding ourselves back from doing as existing law provides. regarding adjustment to increased im­ anything, in the absence of a fully Once the President made his decision, ports in the report of the Randall Com­ rounded program, we should take care the Adjustment Assistance Board would, mission. Mr. MacDonald, president of of the present problem. That is what in those cases where the President so the United Steel Workers of America, this proposed legislation is all about. ·directed, be charged with the responsi­ was labor's representative on the Randall IS THIS SOCIALISM? bility of determining eligibility for the Commission. Even though the majority There may be some who will call the benefits provided for in the bill. The of the Commission did not choose to go program outlined in this bill socialism·. only change this represents is that, at along with him in these recommenda- . Nothing could be more incorrect. There present, the President can and very fre­ tions, they did think sufficiently well of is nothing compulsory about the assist­ quently does refuse to accept Tariff Com­ the recommendations to give them great ance provided for in this bill. Nothing mission recommendations despite find­ prominence in the final report of the in it would give to the State, or any of ings of injury. Under this legislation, Commission. its representatives, any power to push when he does so, he could invoke the With regard to community adjust­ people around or to force them to shift provisions of the act to aid affected in­ ment, Mr. MacDonald said: from one line of activity to another. In­ dustries if he feels that such aid is Large sectors of expanding American in­ stead, it would, in quite democratic needed. dustry have a substantial interest in pro­ moting export trade and, consequently, in fashion, lend a helping hand to those The Adjustment Assistance Board lowering barriers to increased imports. Most who happen· to be situated in uneco­ would keep in close touch with the situ­ of these manufacturers are in fast-growing nomic endeavors. It is not central plan­ ation and whenever in its opinion the industries and have long-term plans for ex·­ ning. On the contrary, it would facili­ benefits provided are no longer neces­ panding their plant and equipment. If a tate the adjustments that would occur sary, it would order their termination. number of such firms would undertake to in the natural course of events in the place a. relatively small proportion of their The intention of the leg-islation is not to branch plant expansion in areas with pres­ absence of Government interference. create a new set of vested interests but ent or prospective labor surpluses resulting Instead of allowing the natural forces to to facilitate adjustment for affected in­ •from import competition, selecting from work themselves out slowly, it would dustries which in all li~elihood would their expansion plans .such operations as speed them up. . 500 CONGRESSJONAL_ RECORD_- HOUSE January 20.

This is the precise opposition of so­ RussiallS she had domination Qver at th~ effect of their tariff concessions .. or cialism. It would not substitute deci· close of Wprld War I:t. Can anyone reductions. · · · · · · · sions of the State for decisions by in.; truthfully say world peace has been Mr. Speaker, the following are some dividuals, but would, rather make the advanced? . of the general effects of tari1! reductions decisions of individuals meaningful. Second, Mr. Speaker, what about world upon our American. industries: . . This legislation would, in my opinion, prosperity? Are we any nearer world First. The American jeweled watch make the individual enterprise system prosperity today than we were in 1934? industry has been practically closed out even stronger than it now is, relative to To try to bring about world prosperity as a result of our tariff reductions since totalitarian systems. It would go a long we 'have given away over $100 billion in 1934. We formerly had 20 jeweled watch way toward dissipating unreasoning the last 15 years-$60 billion lend-lease companies in the United States; now we fear and, at the same time, would during the war and $50 billion· since the have 3-the Waltham Watch Co., the strengthen our own economy by bring­ war-to say nothing of the $200 billion Elgin Watch Co., and the Hamilton ing the economies of the other countries we have spent for national defense in Watch Co. Eighty percent of the Ameri.,. of the free world closer to ours. Unity the cold war. Has world prosperity been can market for jeweled watches has been here means economic strength. Eco­ advanced by the Reciprocal Trad~ taken over ·by Swiss watch manufac­ nomic strength makes spiritual courage Agreements Act? Certainly, our own turers. and determination easier, and, together prosperity has not been advanced, be­ Second. Lowered tariffs in the fresh with the military preparedness that is cause we are in debt today to the tune and frozen fish industry have resulted in already underway, such strength can go of over $300 billion, which is more than such large fish imports at such· cheap a long way toward the creation of a truly all the other nations _of the world owe, rates that American fishermen are un­ sttong free world. all put together; and more than twice able to compete. Some of our largest fish as much as all the nations of Europe owe, processing plants have moved to· other all put together. countries where wage rates are lower. OUR SO-CALLED RECIPROCAL Thira, Mr. Speaker, what about amity TRADE AGREEMENT PROGRAM Third. Widespread unemployment is among nations? Is good will or amity now prevalent iri our industries that The SPEAKER pro tempore . [Mr. among nations any nearer today than make chinaware, pottery, glassware, and DEANE]. Under previous order of ·the it was before 1934? Let us be specific: kitchen articles. All industries classified House, the· gentleman from Illinois [Mr. Has the relationship between France and as handcrafts are affected, industries MAsoN] is recognized for 20 minutes. .. Germany improved since 1934? Between that depend largely upon hand skills. Mr. MASON. Mr. Speaker, I' ask Pakistan and India? Between Palestine This is the direct result of tariff reduc· unanimous consent to revise and extend and Arabia? Between Italy and Yugo-::­ tions and the greatly increased imports my remarks and include an editorial. . slavia ?.-to say nothing about the _con­ of those articles. The SPEAKER. Is there objection to ditions in the Far East. Fourth. Thousands of lead and zinc the request of the gentleman from What about internal dissensions and miners are today out_of work and on re­ Illinois?. strife? Italy with her 36 percent Com:­ lief because of greatly incr~ased imports There was no objection. munist vote in the last election; France of both lead and zinc. ~ecently our zinc Mr. MASON. Mr. Speaker, I want to with 25 percent of her national legisla­ factories have been reducing their work­ take the time assigned to me to present ture composed of Communist members? ing forces or going on a part-time basis the other _side of the picture that the gen­ What about Nationalist China and Com­ because 'of the importation of processed tleman has just .Presented. munist China? What .about England, zinc. Mr. Speaker, today the United States torn between her Socialist Labor Party has the lowest tariff walls in our entire and her conservative Churchill Party? Fifth. An excellent example of the way history-almost the lowest tariff walls in Has good will among men and amity import licenses work is the American the world-with an average tariff rate among nations been advanced by the motorcycle. American producers for­ of 5.1 percent. This is a lower average Reciprocal Trade Agreements Act? merly enjoyed a substantial market for motorcycles in Great Britain, in Aus~ tariff rate than any one of our principal I say, ''Not so that anyone can no­ trade competitors, with the exception of tralia, and in other British areas. The tice it." British duty on motorcycles was reduced · Japan. Today we stand eighth from the Finally, Mr. Speaker, have world-trade bottom of all the nations of the world on under the reciprocal trade agreements, barriers been reduced? Do we have a but under the British import license sys­ tariff rates, while Great Britain, our chief freer flow of goods today across national competitor, stands fourth from the top tem American motorcycles have been ab­ borders than we had in 1934? Dr. Clair solutely shut out of British markets. No with an average tariff rate of 25.6 per­ Wilcox, one of the best posted men in cent, exactly 5 times as high as our amount of . persuasion by would-be America on problems of foreign trade, American exporters has been able to average tariff rate. We. have traveled formerly director of international trade a long way-a very long way-in the last alter this situation; so today we ship no for the State Department, stated in a motorcycles to England or to Australia, 60 yea-rs, from the position of being one recent speech: of the highest tariff countries in the but they ship their motorcycles and their world to that of being one of the lowest. The trade of the world today is more bicycles into our ports and have taken tightly regimented than it ever has been over a considerable portion of our Dare we lower our tariff rates still fur­ before in history, in time of peace. ther? American market .. Mr. Speaker, our Reciprocal Trade True, tariff wall~ have been lowered Mr. Speaker, these are just a few sam· Agreements Act has been in effect exactly until today world tariff walls are only pies of the direct result of our reciprocal 21 years. It has reached its majority. about half as high as they were in 1934. trade agreements program, and the· re­ What has it accomplished? It was en,. But while world tariff walls have· been sults are only beginning to become evi­ acted in order to advance world peace, lowered, other obstacles or barriers more dent. In the face of these facts-and world prosperity, and amity among na­ effective than tariffs have been erected they are cold hard facts-can anyone say tions. Has it done so? in their place, such as import and ex­ that our reciprocal trade agreements First, Mr. Speaker, has world peace port licenses, trade preferences, cur­ program has been a success? Should been advanced? During the 21 years the rency manipulations, multiple currencies, the program be continued? Should the Reciprocal Trade Agreements Act has quotas, subsidies, state trading, and so President be given the power to lower our been on the books we have had World forth. So, in the face of these facts I tariffs still further.? War II. We have had the Korean inci.. ask, what is the use of lowering tariff These three questions must be met and dent. We have had the so-called Span­ barriers if the nations of the world erect answered by 'the Congress and by the ish civil war. We have had ·a years of other and more effective barriers in the people of the United States. Upon the war in Indochina. We have had trouble place of those that have been lowered? correct answers to these ·questions de­ between England and Egypt, between It is a fact, and we must face it, that pend the future welfare .of -this Nation, India and Pakistan. We have had Com­ under the Reciprocal Trade Agreements its economic welfare, its .financial wel· munist Russia extending her Iron CUr· Act, practically every foreign country fare, yes, its soci~l and spiritual welfare tain beyond her borders until she now that has lowered its tariff duties has as well. ' · has control and domination over 900 erected other barriers against United Mr._ Spealter: the following editorial million people instead of the 300 milli9n States imports, thereby nullifying the taken from ~ th .e . Rich~ond Time~- 1955 CONGRESSIONAL -RECORD--HOUSE 501' Dispatch of Friday, January 14, 195s_::. Mr. EDMONDSON. - Mr. Sp-eaker, in relief at the courthouse, except in real one of the best newspapers in the United the latest issue of the magazine News­ emergency. States, a dyed-in-the-wool Jeffersonian week a distinguished former colleague of There are hungry people in Oklahoma Democratic newspaper--expresses my ours who is now Ambassador to Italy is today, and they number in the thous­ position and feelings so well in regard to quoted as calling the Democrats trouba­ ands. world tariff problems, that I feel I must dours of trouble and crooners of catas­ I call it catastrophe. I call it real include it as a part of my remarks in trophe. trouble. order to reinforce my position on the I have no ambition to be classified by I will continue to speak of it, with all tariff question: Ambassador Luce or anyone else as a the vigor and force I can muster, until . President Eisenhower said in his recent _ blues singer, but I cannot evade the duty the problem is met as this Congress is message to Congress concerning foreign eco­ of reporting to the Congress some very capable of meeting it. · nomic policy: "We and our friends abroad alarming facts· about our Nation's Let me give you several additional must together undertake the lowering of drought catastrophe. pieces of evidence concerning the gravity unjustifiable barriers to trade and invest­ Most Democrats are aware of the fact of our problem. ment, and we must do it on a mutual basis that catastrophes are not confined to so that the benefits may be shared by all." On January 4, 1955, ·the Tulsa World Wall Street, and economic trouble can reported that- So far, so good, but the President did not appear in other zones of national life indicate the extent of the discrimination besides the stock market. Most Demo­ Oklahoma and four other southern Gre'at against our goods overseas, and neither do Plains States may experience dust storms most other American advocates of lowered crats also feel it their duty to bring eco­ this year. worse than any since the thirties. tariff walls. nomic problems of the American people An estimated 1,112,000 acres of parched It should be noted that many govern­ to the attention of Congress, as often land in western Oklahoma are in a "condi­ ments are much more socialistic than ours, and as forcefully as necessary, where our tion to -blow" this winter or spring, the and . hence are in a position to exercise far national interest is involved. Soil Conservation Service has revealed. more control over exports and imports than I prefer to believe that most Republi­ The SCS, in a report circulated at the we do. Great Britain is an exampl~. cans in this House share this breadth of Agriculture Department, said the five-State The picture there may have changed view, and share likewise the Democratic O'l4tlook on soil conditions is more than twice slightly in the past 18 months, but a sum­ philosophy that any national disaster as bad as it was at this time last year. Other mary of the situation in the summer of 1953 · southern Great Plains States are Texas, appeared in U. S. News & World Report, as which is too big for local and State han­ Kansas, New Mexico, and Colorado. follows: dling is worthy of immediate attention SCS specialists reported that more dam­ "In Britain, the United States merchant and aggressive action by our Govern- a,se was done last year than in any single cannot sell autos, radios, or TV sets. He can ment. · year of the thirties. sell only token amounts of washing ma­ No one can deny the national scope of September, October, and November of 1954 chines, refrigerators, vacuum cleaners, our drought disaster. At present, 944 were generally dry or below average in pre­ dresses, cosmetics, and other nonessentials. counties in 18 States are recognized by cipitation, according to the report. He finds the Government regulating trade "Soil-moisture reserves have not been re­ in cotton, tobacco, machine tools, and other the Department of Agriculture as drought emergency areas. The drought plenished to carry the wheat through the necessities. His customers are bound by winter and next spring, except in a few quotas · and ·licenses, which -tell how much area extends from North Carolina west­ localities," the SCS said. can be bought from the United States and­ ward to Utah and Wyoming, and in­ Drought conditions over the past several by whom. They need permits for dollars to cludes in addition the great States of years have not produced cover for the land pay." Alabama, Arkansas, Colorado, Georgia, and much land does not have crop residues Not only is the foregoing true of the coun­ Kansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, or structure or surface roughness. try which is perhaps our best friend on Nevada, New Mexico, Oklahoma, South the international scene, but Britain has been Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, and Virginia. This basic condition of the soil is the treating other European countries better reason why rains and snow which have than it treats us-Germany, to take one ex­ Farmers home disaster loans have been made available in 8 of these 18 been falling during the current month­ ample. Germany is permitted to export au­ while very helpful and greatly appre­ tomobiles to Britain, for instance, whereas States-Kansas, Louisiana, Missouri, we are forbidden to do so. New Mexico, Mississippi, Oklahoma, ciated-are not likely to avert a continu­ It should be pointed out that this latter Tennessee, and Texas. ation of drought conditions in 1955. type of discrimination was put into effect We have had the attention of our On the contrary, Oklahoma A. and M. throughout western Europe with the consent National Government, all right, and to climate experts have officially predicted of our own authorities, who were seeking a limited extent we have had Federal another dry year in 1955. to build up European industries so as to get On January 18, Gov. Raymond , them off the backs of the American taxpayer. action. Now that those industries have been built On the basis of considerable mail as of Oklahoma, wired me that- up, it seems highly desirable that this type well as first hand observation in the Only small areas in Oklahoma have had of discrimination be terminated. drought areas of Oklahoma, I cannot any moisture and prospects for production Various other devices for keeping out avoid this conclusion regarding our Fed­ of hay this coming spring and summer are American goods should also be terminated .. eral drought program: Relief has not not good. Two years of normal rainfall It would be absurd for us to lower our bar­ only been too little and too late, but all needed to bring native pastures back to nor­ riers substantially, while Europe, Japan, and mal. Long-range forecast indicates below other countries kept theirs virtually station­ too often the relief has been given in normal rainfall for next 12 months. ary, or raised them. the wrong place. Nor is there any point in minimizing the There is strong and mounting evidence From the Pawhuska Journal of Decem­ tremendous obstacles inherent in the social­ that the small farmer and cattleman ber 12, 1954, comes this confirming evi­ istic, planned economies of many countries. with limited resources and most urgent dence of the drought's severity: Controls and economic planning usually go need for drought assistance is not re­ Oklahoma's worst drought year since 1910 hand in hand. ceiving substantial help from the present 1s rapidly drawing to a close with profound Mr. Eisenhower's emphasis on mutual con­ program. effects on the State's agricultural economy, cessions is precisely right, ·but let's never lose The Department of Agriculture can an Associated Press survey showed Saturday. sight of the fact that barriers to a free flow The resulting hardships are multiplied be­ of trade are even higher abroad than they show some handsome figures on feed cause the entire State has already been stag­ 'are at home. As such, they will have to be assistance and FHA loans, but those of gered by a dry cycle which has had agriculture brought down proportionately with ours, if us in hard-hit drought areas can cite on the skids for some years now. any effective and meaningful lowering of far too many instances of wholesale herd More than 100,000 persons are receiving these barriers on an international scale is 'to liquidations, farm sell-outs and food food and other relief directly from the State be had. relief cases. Emergency Relief Board exclusive of the gen­ In my own State, 115,000 people are eral welfare aid in a revival of the program reported on direct food relief, and the used in the depression. THE NATION'S DROUGHT More Oklahomans were looking for work CATASTROPHE total is expected to reach 125,000 by March 1 of 1955. Farm officials tell me December 1 than any comparable time since The SPEAKER pro tempore. Unqer 1946. that more than one-half of these people Farmers and ranchers have just completed previous order of the House, the gentle­ are farmers and their families. a poor crop and livestock year, and the con­ man from Oklahoma [Mr. EDMONDSON] I know the farm people of Oklahoma, tinuing drought has placed a dark cloud over is recognized for 30 minutes. and I know they would not seek food their prospects for next year. 502 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD- HOUSE January-20

In the same article are these b1eak dropped almost $3¥2 billion in 1954. Ag~ also recognize, on a permanent basis, the figures on crop yields in 1954: riculture is the only segment of our econ~ national and enduring character of the This drought year saw the cotton yield omy showing no gain in 1954, and it is problem qf drought; which is nothing decline one-third from the . 467,000 oa~es in the only one anticipating nothing but but critical shortage of water at a given 1953. reductions in 1955. time and point. Wheat, the State's big money crop, is not The national figures on farm income I am hopeful the President's forth­ even up to a stand in many areas, and this and farm equities, when added to the re~ , coming recommendations for drought year's crop was below average at around 70 million bushels. gional catastrophe of drought, are addi­ legislation, promised us on January 6, Corn, once a major crop, climaxed several tional cause for genuine alarm over the will recognize this need for a permanent years of near failures with the worst yield in announced budget plans in the field of national program. I am hopeful it will history--3,258,000 bushels, about one-eighth agriculture. remedy the financial shortcomings of of what the State once harvested. The figures offer small promise of ad­ the budget message in this field with Confronted with a shortage of hay and ditional strengthening of our declining an urgent request for additional funds grain feeds, farmers are having to spend more farm income-and certainly are a danger to finance the battle on drought. than ever for feed with the knowledge they In the hope of lending some small as~ may not break even. Federal aid in the form signal for all who are interested in of cheaper feed, loans, and lower hay freight seeing a realistic and helpful drought sistance in the legislative field, I plan to rates has helped, but fell far short of solving program. follow this brief talk in a few days with the problem. A frontline fighting force in the bat~ a detailed report on the subject of a The cattleman is the major victim of the tle against drought damage is the Soil drought program. drought, in the opinion of Harley Custer, Conservation Service, which the presi~ Because the first step in improvement manager of the National Livestock Commis­ dential budget proposes to cut from $59,~ is to locate and understand mistakes in sion Co. 085,671 in fiscal year 1955 to $55,696,200 what we now have, the first portion of Custer, a keen observer of the livestock in fiscal 1956. this report will deal with some of the situation who has appraised h~rds all over the State, says the rancher today is definitely Loan authority for the Farmers' Home shortcomings of the present disaster not making any money. Administration, chief source of disaster program. Like most Members from the "He can't get enough fo:~;: a calf to pay keep­ loans, has been reduced from $166 mil~ . drought areas, I have had many letters ing the cow all year and still pay his over­ lion in 1954 to $153 million in 1955, and and telephone calls on this subject. head,' he said. "The cow that used to bring $147 million in 1956. The charges against our present pro~ a $150 calf now brings a $75 calf. The cost The agricultural conservation pro~ gram include the general complaint of of keeping her is still at least $40. Virtually all the profit is absorbed, and only a big gram, in charge . of soil-building and inadequacy, many specific complaints of operator with a good quality herd can sur­ water-conserving practices, has its new discrimination against the small and vive for long." money cut from a $226 million actual ex~ lightly financed farmer and rancher, and penditure in .1954 to a recommended the serious charge that bigtime feed and It is a tribute to the toughness and $175 million in fiscal1956. Although $15 seed dealers, speculating and profiteer~ courage of the Oklahoma farmer and million was appropriated for emergency. ing in many cases with Government sur~ rancher, in addition to the relief meas~ wind damage control in 1954, absolutely plus commodities, have been the chief ures which have been undertaken thus nothing is recommended for this worth..:. beneficiaries of our drought relief pro~ far, that so many have been able to sur~ while purpose in the new budget. gram. vive as long as they have. Further darkening the picture of To some extent, at least, my forth~ The figures on farm income for 1954 funds recommended to meet the farm~ coming report will document these are further evidence of the national ers' needs, we read in the budget of a charges. character of the problem we face. $15 million cut in funds for commodity I also have in preparation several The December 16, 1954, release by t:he procurement for the school-lunch pro~ pieces of proposed legislation, designed Department of Agriculture on the farm gram. to repair at once some of the weaknesses income situation illustrates the plight of The announced intention of continu~ in our present disaster program, and to all farmers. According to this report, ing to provide sw·plus foods for this pro~ provide the framework for a permanent cash receipts from farm marketings for gram, while commendable, does little to and constructive approach to drought the first 10 months of 1954 were more meet the problem of declining farmer control. than a billion dollars below those for the income. . I am sure the Members of the 84th same period of 1953. Although farm Like most Americans from our coun­ Congress, in large part, share my earnest marketings for the first 11 months aver~ try's drought areas, I was cheered by belief that we cannot hope for a prosper­ aged 4 percent less than in the same these words in President Eisenhower's ous America without a prosperous farm period of 1953, marketings in October state of the Union message · on Janu~ economy. were 9 percent below October of 1953. ary 6: Unless we defeat the grim menace of In Oklahoma, one of the two States Because drought also remains a serious drought damage, there is little hope for in which all counties have been declared agricultural problem, I shall recommend nationwide farm prosperity in the next eligible for drought-emergency assist~ legislation to strengthen Federal" disaster as­ few years. ance, cash receipts from crops marketed sistance programs. The people of Oklahoma are grateful in October 1954 were more than $14 I awaited the budget message with the for the national recognition already ex~ million below October 1953, a drop of al~ earnest hope that it would include money tended to the drought emergency which most 34 percent. In the other State of recommendations which would make they share with other States. As one of 100-percent drought damage, South possible the needed liberalization of ex­ their Representatives in this great delib~ Carolina, crop receipts were down almost isting drought disaster programs, includ­ erative body, I respectfully urge that this $27 million or almost 50 percent. ing expansion of soil conservation and Congress lose no time in translating that Total crop receipts in October 1954 ACP activities, greater lending authority recognition into constructive and ade­ w~re about $241 million below October for !"HA, money for needed refinancing quate action. 19li3. In only 11 States among those loans on a long-term basis and at low Mr. ALBERT. Mr. Speaker, will the listed in the drought-emergency cate~ interest rateG. gentleman yield? gory, crop receipts were down $286 mil~ We urgently need a truly long-term Mr. EDMONDSON. I yield to the gen~ lion in the same month. Crop receipts approach to the problem of drought. tleman from Oklahoma. · in Mississippi, a . State hard hit by which is just as devastating and cr1,1el Mr. ALBERT. I want to congratulate drought, were down more than $70 mil­ in its huma,n and property damage as my colleague upon the very informative. lion in October, a drop of about 50 per­ the menace of floods. well worked out and splendid statement cent. In my opinion, the time has come for he has made to the House. I want also The income outlook for most of our a national drought-control program-a to compliment him for the work he has farmers is a dark one indeed. Farm program as well planned, organized, and done on behalf of the drought-stricken prices are down and it appears to be financed as our flood -control program. people of Oklahoma. He has given more the purpose of the Department o!f Agri­ Everyone recognizes the national and attention to this subject than any Mem~ culture's present leadership to drive enduring character of the problem of ber of this House. them still lower. According to the flood-of a surplus of water at a . given Mr. EDMONDSON. I thank the gen~ chamber of commerce, farm equities 'time and point-and the Congress should tleman. He is certainly one .of our 1955 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD- HOUSE 503 State's great legislative leaders and one Mr. EDMONDSON. I thank the gen­ without any mental reservation or who has done and is doing more for the tleman, and I appreciate his breadth of purpose of evasion; and that I will farmers than any other Member of Con­ vision and his interest on this point, be­ well and faithfully discharge the gress from Oklahoma. cause if we do not have a prosperous duties of the office on which I am Mr. of Louisiana. Mr. farm economy, it is not possible for our about to enter. So help me God." Speaker, will the gentleman yield? farmers to buy the products of the in­ has been subscribed to in person and Mr. EDMONDSON. I yield to the dustrial East and North and other sec­ flied in duplicate with the Clerk of the gentleman from Louisiana. tions of our country. House of Representatives by each of the Mr. BROOKS of Louisiana. I want to following Members and Delegates of the compliment the gentleman on his very EXTENSION OF REMARKS 84th Congress, pursuant to Public Law splendid presentation of the problem in­ 412 of the 80th Congress entitled "An volving the drought-stricken rancher By unanimous consent, permission to act to amend section 30 of the Revised and farmer. My section of Louisiana is extend remarks in the RECORD, or to re­ Statutes of the United States" (U. S. c., in that disaster area and has been desig­ Vise and extend remarks, was granted to: title 2, sec. 25), approved February 18, nated so by the President of the United Mr. ASHMORE. 1948: States. The program has been placed in Mr. GENTRY. ALABAMA effect in that area. Mr. BARTLETT and to include an edi­ 1. Frank W. Boykin. In line with what the gentleman has torial. 2. George M. Grant. said I want to comment brie:fiy, if the Mr. RODINO. 3. George W. Andrews. gentleman will permit me in his time, Mr. ANFuso

H. R. 2758. A bill ior the relief of Schlllerla, . H. R. 2777. A' bill fqr "t lie i'ellef' of Geor~e By Mr. WESTLAND' (by request): Rifka, ·and Kalman Blady; to the Committee L. Goetz; to the Committee on the Judiciary: H. R. 2794. A bill for the relief of Bjorne on the Judiciary. · By Mr. ROGERS of Colorado: Norman deBough; to the Committee on the H . R. 2759. A bill for the relief of the Yahya H. R. 2778. A bill for the relief of Jacob Judiciary. Aryeh family; Malekjahan, Moussa, Nouriel, Grynberg; to the Committee on the Judi·: By Mr. WICKERSHAM: Gabriel, Emanuel, Parvin, Curiel, Ouziel, ciary. H . R. 2795. A bill authorizing the President Eliahou, and Samuel Aryeh; to the Commit­ H. R. 2779. A bill for the relief of Mikie of the United States to present in the n ame tee on the Judiciary. Sato and Haruhiro Sato; to t}+e Committee: of Congress a Medal of Honor to Joseph H. R. 2760. A bill for the relief of the estate on the Judiciary. Oklahombi; to . the Committee on Armed of William B. Rice; to the Committee on the By Mr. SCHERER: Services. Judiciary. H. R. 2780. A bill for the relief of Dr. Byung By Mr. WIDNALL: H. R. 2761. A bill for the relief of Maria Hack Youn; to the Committee on the Ju-· H. R. 2796. A bill for the relief of Mrs. (Henriette) Zagrabowicz; to the Committee diciary. Khatoun Malkey Samuel; to the Committee on the Judiciary. · By Mr. SEELY-BROWN: on the Judiciary. H. R. 2762. A bill for the relief of Bent H. R . 2781. A bill for the relief of Anna G. By Mr. WILLIAMS of New Jersey: Petersen; to the Committee on the Judi­ Pruczinski Wood; to the Committee on the H. R. 2797. A bill for the relief of Mrs. Seyre ciary. Judiciary. Odichou; to the Committee on the Judiciary. H. R. 2763. A bill for the relief of Aurelio· By Mr. SHEPPARD: By Mr. WILSON of California: Guidi, Andreina Guidi, and Giorgio Guidi; . H. R. 2782. A bill for the relief of Josefa H. R. 2798. A bill for the relief of Alfred to the Committee on the Judiciary. Martinez Infante; to the Committee on the Johann Hoinski; to the Committee on the H. R. 2764. A bill for the relief of Victor Judiciary. Judiciary. and Irene-Wanda Goldstein; to the Commit· By Mr. SHORT: H. R. 2799. A bill for the relief of Milan P. tee on the Judiciary. H. R. 2783. A bill for the relief of Andrew, Vojvodic; to the Committee on the Judiciary. H. R. 2765. A bill for the relief of Joseph, Wing-Huen Tsang; to the Committee on the By Mr. MARTIN: Brocha, and Jehoushija Genger; to the Com­ Judiciary: H . J. Res. 158. Joint resolution authorizing mittee on the Judiciary. By Mr. SHUFORD: the appointment - of General of the Army By Mr. PATTERSON: . H . R. 2784. A bill for the relief of Dixie. Douglas MacArthur as general of the armies H. R. 2766. A bill for the -relief of Jose Novelty Co.; to the Committee on the Ju­ of the United States·; to the Committee on Maria Lopes Ramos and his wife and minor diciary. Armed Services. children; to the Committee on the Judiciary., By Mr. SMITH of Virginia: By Mr. POAGE; · H. R. 2785. A bill for the relief of Anesti N. H. R. 2767. A bill for the relief of Edward­ Baicoushe1f; to the. Committee on the Ju· PETITIONS, ETC. Mixson; to the Committee on the Judiciary. diciaryBy Mr. TRIMBLE:: Under clause 1 of rule XXII, petitions H. R. 2768. A bill for the relief of Charles' R. Law, Jr.; to the Committee on the Judi·. H. R: 2786. A bill for the relief of Mrs. Jean~ and papers were laid on the Clerk's desk ciary. Barbara Laing Vance; to the Committee on and referred as follows: H. R. 2769. A bill for the relief of Tennessee tbe Judiciary. · 56. By Mr. -CANFlELD: Petition of the New c. Batts; to the Committee on the Judiciary. By Mr; UDALL: Jersey State League of Municipalities oppos- By Mr. RAY: . H. R. 278'7. A bill to authorize the accept- fng any proposal by Congress to tax the in­ H. R. 2770. A bill for the relief of Elly S. ance on behalf of the United States of the come of municipal a~d other public agency (Angelides) Christofllos; to the Committee conveyance and release by the Aztec Land· bonds; to the Committee on Ways and Means. on the Judiciary. & Cattle Co., Ltd., of its right, title, and in-. 57. Also, petition of the New Jersey State By Mr. REECE of Tennessee: terest in lands within the Coconino and League of Municipalities supporting the H. R. 2771. A bill for the relief of Mrs. Sitgreaves National Forests, in the State ·bf actions of the American Municipal Associa­ Soledad Tejera Suarez Herreros and her son, Arizona, and the payment to said company· tion in urging Congress to provide payments Rafael; to the Committee on the Judiciary. of the value of such lands, and for other· to municipalities in lieu· of taxes on federally H. R. 2772. A bill for the relief of Jamil purposes; to the Committee on Interior and. owned property; to the Committee on In- Masri; to the Committee on the Judiciary.' Insular Affairs. terior and Insular Affairs. H. R. 2773. A bill conferring jurisdiction By Mr. UTT: - 58. By Mr. JENNINGS: Petition of the upon the United States District Court for H. R. 2788. A bill for the relief of Miguel· Smyth County Farmers Union urging that · the Eastern District of Tennessee to hear, Sandoval-Michel (also known as Arturo, legislation be enacted to permit the Korean determine, and render judgment upon any Rodriguez-Gomez); to the Committee on the war veterans to receive the same benefits claim arising out of personal property dam-· Judiciary. as those of World Warn in regard to institu­ age sustained by the Security Feed and Seed . H. R. 2789. A bill for the x:ellef of Andrija· tional on-farm training; to the Committee on' Co. of Johnson City, Tenn.; to the Committee Artukovic; to the Committee on the Judi-, Veterans' Affairs. on the Judiciary. ciary. 59. By Mr. SMITH of Wisconsin: Resolu- By Mr. RHODES of Arizona: H. R. 2790. A bill for the relief of Ana Marta· tion of the Veterans of Foreign wars, Depart­ H. R. 2774. A bill to authorize the accept·· Artukovic, Visnja M. Artukovlc, Zorica D u ment of Wisconsin, in a meeting held at ance on behalf of the United"States of the Artukovic, and Radoslav Artuk.ovic; to the Kenosha, Wis., in December 1954 "that the conveyance and release by the Aztec Land and Committee on the Judiciary. time has come for the United States to de· Cattle Co., Ltd., of its right, title, and in· By Mr. WATTS: fend its citizens by delivering an ultimatum terest in lands within the Coconino and H. R. 2791. A bill for the relief of Ofelia to Red China to set free all prisoners, both Sitgreaves National Forests, in the State of Martin; to the Committee on the Judiciary.: military and civilian, who are being unjustly Arizona, and the payment to said company By Mr. WESTLAND: confined; further that in the event of a re- of the value of such lands, _and for other . H. R. 2792. A bill for the relief of Glen fusal by Red China to comply with such re· purposes; to the Committee on Interior and Miner; to the Committee on the Judiciary. quest, that-the United States take such post- Insular Affairs. H. R. 2793. A bill conferring jurisdictioll' tive action as is deemed necessary to accom­ By Mr. ROBSION of Kentucky: upon the Court of Claims· of the United plish the purpose of this resolution"; to the . H. R. 2775. A bill for the relief of Chrisavge States to hear, examine, adjudicate, and: Committee on Foreign Affairs . Christodoulopoulou; to the Committee on render judgment on any and all claims in 60. Also, resolution of the Rock County, the Judiciary. . law or equity, which Maquinna Jangle Clap- Wis., Bar Association unanimously adopted H. R. 2776. A bill for the relief of Lillian lanhoo, of Neah Bay, Wash., may have against on December--16, 1954:, in protest against the ~rensen Howell; to the Committee on the the United States; to the Committee on the 1.ncreasing complexity of Federal income tax Judiciary. Judiciary. laws; to the Committee on Ways and Means.

_E,XTENSt'ONS OF .REMAR_KS Set Net Legislation Alaska fishery are made and enforced ery. The Fish and Wildlife Service im­ by the Fish and Wildlife Service of the mediately announced that as a conse-. EXTENSION OF REMARKS Department of the Interior. -By custom quence of this ruling 1955 regulations OP and, it must be assumed, because con~ would require these nets to. be not less servation would best be served thereby, than 1,800 feet distant one from another HON.E.L.BARTLETT set nets, a form of gear for the taking o( or a much greater distance than has DELEGATE FROM ALASKA salmon, have been spaced at di1Ierent been the case in most. areas of. Alaska. IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVFS distances in different sections of Alaska: It is generally agreed that this would Last summer a Federal judge of the dis-. create :chaos, no less. Therefore bills Thursday, January 20, 1955 trict court for Alaska held that set nets have been introduced in the Congress Mr. BARTLETI'. Mr. Speaker, under are fixed gear· within the meaning of the seeking legislative cure.· It is my under­ Federal law, regulations governing the organic act concerning the Alaska fish- standing that in principle they are en-