DOCSLIB.ORG

Lest We Regret

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Lest We Regret Lest We Regret by Douglas Reed published: 1943 CONTENTS Author's Note Part One - Great Argument Part Four - Battle In England 01 To Friends And Foes 01 In Civvy Street 02 ‘Something Constructive!’ 02 When The Boys Come Home 03 When The Girls Come Home 04 Snap! Part Two - Freedom Lost! 05 Peace, The Graveyard 06 The Example Of France 01 God’s Englishman 07 The House That Jerry Built 02 Where England Stood 08 Escape! 03 Where England Stands 09 The Example Of Germany 10 ‘All Nazis And Quislings’ 11 The Breed! Part Three - Freedom Regained? 12 A Tale Of Three Mothers 13 The Children Of Israel 01 First Things First 14 On Holding Our Own 02 The Choice Of Enemies 15 Social Security 03 Whodunnit? 16 Nineteen-Sixty Corner 04 The Re-education Of England 05 Four English Freedoms Kind Friends, Adieu AUTHOR'S NOTE I would be grateful if people in many parts of the Empire, who have received no reply from me, would read this book as an acknowledgment of their letters, a token of friendship reciprocated and an answer to their questions. I was forced to choose between continuing to write books or entering into a correspondence so great, that it would have occupied all my time. Most of these letters share a common theme - anxiety for the future, however our victory in this war may appear - and this book is a joint reply to them. The clear road beyond victory, for which we long, is still not visible. That is why I chose for my title the words Battle in England, from a letter written by a young officer who served far away from this, his native island. The letter was not sent to me; it was quoted in the House of Commons. One sentence vividly expresses the thought that prompts this book: 'We still feel out here that the ultimate battle is being won or lost in England.' And so it is. With victory, the battle for our future will only begin. The years 1919-39 are close enough for us to remember that. My publisher thought that the title I chose would confuse readers, who would expect from it a book about the military battle of Britain. The cover, therefore, bears another title: Lest We Regret. The theme of the book, nevertheless, is that 'Battle in England' which will have to be fought and won in this island, after the war, if our future is not to be lost. I have interpolated in the text several quotations from letters to me; they were so apt to my theme that I have used them to illustrate it. *** this PDF prepared by www.douglasreed.co.uk *** PART ONE GREAT ARGUMENT Chapter One TO FRIENDS AND FOES It is the land that freemen till That sober-suited-Freedom shows; The land where, girt with friends or foes, A man may speak the things he will. - TENNYSON Even good things come to an end, and this, gentle reader (forgive an outmoded salutation; to be abreast of the courtly times I ought to call you 'sucker' if you applaud me and 'rat' if you do not, but being a writer called rabid I love 'gentle reader'), this is the last of the books with which I have goaded and coaxed you, one nearly every year, since 1938. This opening sentence gives any I may vex an opportunity such as comes only once and I make no charge for it. (But neither rejoice nor lament too soon, gentle reader. If you will allow me a moment to change my literary clothes, I shall soon reappear before you in another guise.) Of its kind, alone, is this book the last. It is the end of my modest foresight saga, which I began in 1938 with a book called Insanity Fair. Great were my expectations then. Foreseeing this war, I thought I might avert it - with a book. O young man in a flurry! I foresaw then that little time remained before a thing might happen, which would leave this country the choice between capitulation without a fight and a war began in the worst imaginable circumstances for itself, and this thing was, the abandonment of a little country far away, called Czechoslovakia. Many chances to avert the war, were already gone; this one remained. To-day, those thunders of yesteryear dwindle, and Insanity Fair and its three children go their rounds, soon to be joined by this, the fourth and last. I did not guess, when I began, that I should write more than one book, or suspect how much personal satisfaction I should reap, in spite of the disappointment of the hope which inspired the original book. For the first time in my life, excluding the war service which I shared with millions of others, I cast from me thoughts of money, security, a career and the future, and acted from a patriotic impulse too strong to be thwarted. Yet the financial calamity I feared, like Shaw's disasters, never happened: in place of the calling I reluctantly gave up, I gained a better; and I surprise myself by the pleasure I still derive from having punched on the nose the craven imp, 'Safety First', and said the thing I would and the thing I knew. In that listless England, I 'did something', the most I could, and if this was but a book which has now joined the legion of others it was mine own. If I could plant the seed of adventure and the ideal of upholding what you think right at all costs, in any youngsters' minds to-day, by writing this, I should be glad, for I know that they would gain by it. Enough is enough. I gather that I do not bore others, but refuse to bore myself. Not for me, to outstay my encores (and I once saw even that happen, at the Scala in Berlin, when an English band leader was so clamantly applauded that he gave an encore, then two, five, ten encores, turning between each to ask 'Do you want more?' until the audience became silent, then restive, and finally called 'No, no more!') Prognostication is the thief of time, and I have other things to do. Because I believe our future salvation can only come from, through, or be taken from us by our Parliament, which robbed us of the last victory, I shall try to enter that building, where voices for England speak so seldom and so often for all else. When peace comes, I want also to go abroad and write of what goes on there, in the hope that the people of this country, if they are accurately informed, will not let themselves be hoodwinked again. But first, this book, the last of it's line. It is a fitting finish to the logical sequence. Insanity Fair was an urgent warning of the imminent outbreak of war. Lest We Regret is an urgent warning of a greater danger, the approaching outbreak of peace. This statement was greeted as a jest when I made it to a luncheon audience in London. The English take their leisure sadly and like to beguile it by listening to a speaker with whom they disagree while eating food which disagrees with them. Between indignation and indigestion, they have a grand time. They pay much for a bad meal and nothing for a good speaker (the odd belief prevails that the hotel- keeper deserves payment for his wares but not the speaker). But this was no joke! To-day millions of people have their every want cared for; to-morrow, they will need to fend for themselves. To-day all have work; to-morrow, each will have to seek it. To-day the young people take no thought for the morrow; to-morrow, they must think hard for the day. To-day, all clearly see their task, to win the war; and think they see clearly how to accomplish it, by serving. To-morrow, they will wish to live in peace, found families and prosper, but will they see the way to achieve that? To-day is filled with the adventure of war; to-morrow will be filled with humdrum. Such, at least, was the last peace. It was not peace. It was worse than the last war, worse than this war. These words protest against being written, yet they are true. The last peace, which was to endure for ever, held for twenty years. Twenty years of mass unemployment, derelict areas, a decaying countryside, growing disbelief and despair; twenty years, during which the men who came back from the last war saw their victory wantonly thrown away, while the rising generation lost faith in the future and the new war approached. That was the peace of 1919-39. That is the world to which the boys and girls will return unless they make it different. That is where I and this book come in: Having a son, a fighter pilot who got his wings at the age of eighteen, and a daughter who, after serving as an A.T.S. private in a mixed anti-aircraft battery for twelve months, now has a commission, I have come in contact during the past three years with a great number of the ordinary rank-and-file of the young generation. I feel convinced that these intelligent, deep-thinking boys and girls are not going to leave the making of the new world to anyone but themselves, when the war is won.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Chronological Table of Productions at the Theatre Royal
    1 CHRONOLOGICAL TABLE OF PRODUCTIONS AT THE THEATRE ROYAL 1884 17 - 20 December Richelieu 22 - 24 December Belphegor The Loan of a Lover 26 December-9 Jan Proof 1885 10 January The Lady of Lyons 12 - 17 January The Duke’s Motto 19 - 21 January East Lynne 22 - 23 January Leah 24 - 30 January Richard III 31 January The Stranger Robert Macaire 2 - 6 February Ambition (Catherine Howard) 7 February William Tell East Lynne 9 - 21 February Never Too Late to Mend 23 - 28 February Drink 2 - 4 March Macbeth 5-7 March Hamlet 9 - 14 March The Danites 16 - 20 March Streets of London 21 March Don Caezar de Bazan Black Eyed Susan 23 - 25 March The Octoroo 26 - 27 March The Merchant of Venice The Royalist and the Republican 28 March The Bells Black Eyed Susan 30 March - 1 April The Colleen Bawn 2 April Ingomar The Watermen 3 April CLOSED (GOOD FRIDAY) 4 April Othello 6 - 11 April Mazeppa The Little Pest 13 - 14 April Othello 15 - 16 April Belphegor 17 April Ingomar 18 April Pizarro Cartouche 20 - 22 April Ticket of Leave Man 23 April The Honeymoon Withered Leaves 24 April Ticket of Leave Man 25 April - 1 May Forsaken 2 May The Beggar’s Petition Forsaken (two acts) 4 - 5 May Rob Roy 2 6 May The Shaughraun 7 May Don Caesar de Bazan 8 May The Shaughraun 9 May The Devil in Paris Poor Joe 11 May Chevalier St George 12 May Richelieu 13 May Hamlet 14 May Romeo and Juliet 15 May Richard III 16 May Romeo and Juliet 18 - 20 May My Comrade 21 May Arra-na-pogue 22 May My Comrade 23 - 30 May Uncle Tom’s Cabin 1 - 13 June My Sweetheart 15 - 20 June Mardo 22 June -
    [Show full text]
  • The Image of the Journalist in Silent Film, Part One: 1890 to 1919
    Journalist in Silent Film 35 The Image of the Journalist in Silent Film, 1890 to 1929: Part One 1890 to 1919 Joe Saltzman Professor of Journalism Director of the Image of the Journalist in Popular Culture (IJPC) A Project of the Norman Lear Center Annenberg School for Communication and Journalism University of Southern California Los Angeles, CA [email protected] with Liz Mitchell Senior Research Associate Image of the Journalist in Popular Culture (IJPC) Annenberg School for Communication and Journalism University of Southern California Los Angeles, CA [email protected] Introduction This is the first installment in the landmark study of “The Image of the Journalist in Silent Film, 1890 to 1929.” It covers 1,948 films from 1890 to 1919. Part Two will cover the years from 1920 to the beginning of recorded sound in 1929. This is the first comprehensive study of the beginning of cinema’s earliest depictions of the journalist, mostly newspaper reporters, editors, and publishers. Newspaper fiction flourished at a time when journalism “was a revolutionary force, tearing up traditions, redefining public morality, and lending voice and encouragement to the disenfranchised. It reflected currents sweeping through every phase of American life. The skyrocketing circulations, the manic search for exclusive news, the sensational headlines, and the concentration of newspaper ownership were signs of an America changing from a rural society to an urban and industrial one. Since journalism so clearly mirrored and so loudly supported the new order, it became the preeminent symbol for the mechanization, standardization, democratization, and vulgarization of culture.”1 Historian Howard Good points out that the 1890s “represented a watershed not only in American journalism but also in American history.
    [Show full text]
  • Dickens's Characters and Rousseau's Philosophy Jane Phares
    Florida State University Libraries Electronic Theses, Treatises and Dissertations The Graduate School 2009 Natural, Civilized, Citizen: Dickens's Characters and Rousseau's Philosophy Jane Phares Follow this and additional works at the FSU Digital Library. For more information, please contact [email protected] THE FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES NATURAL, CIVILIZED, CITIZEN: DICKENS‘S CHARACTERS AND ROUSSEAU‘S PHILOSOPHY By JANE PHARES A Dissertation submitted to the Department of English in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Degree Awarded: Fall Semester, 2009 The members of the committee approve the dissertation of Jane Phares defended on October 21, 2009. __________________________________ John Fenstermaker Professor Directing Dissertation __________________________________ Neil Jumonville University Representative __________________________________ Fred Standley Committee Member __________________________________ Eric Walker Committee Member Approved: _____________________________________ Ralph M. Berry, Chair, Department of English The Graduate School has verified and approved the above-named committee members. v I dedicate this to my great cloud of witnesses, who never gave up hope that I would complete my degree, and whose spirits continued to encourage me throughout the process: Bill Caddell June Smith My aunt, Marie Kyzer And most especially, My beloved mother, Rachel Phares vi ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS My sincere appreciation goes to Sally Allocca, for her assistance with proofreading and checking citations; to the members of my committee, Dr. Neil Jumonville, Dr. Fred Standley, and Dr. Eric Walker; and to Dr. John Fenstermaker, who provided invaluable help on this project, showed unending patience, and inspired my love for Dickens. vii TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Abbreviations ................................................................................. vi Abstract ...............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Re-Imagining the War in British Film, 1945-1955
    RE-IMAGINING THE WAR IN BRITISH FILM, 1945-1955 BY MICHAEL WILLIAM BOYCE A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Department of English University of Manitoba Winnipeg, Manitoba © April, 2007 ii ABSTRACT In the immediate post-war years, the war is curiously, although not totally, absent in British film, which seem to be occupied with “getting on” with life and offering distraction from the realities of post-war life. It is the time of the celebrated Ealing comedies, such as Kind Hearts and Coronets (1949) and The Ladykillers (1955), Dickens adaptations, and the Archers’ most ambitious projects. Critics tend to ignore these films that suppress the presence of the war when drawing connections to the post-war situation. However, the impact of the war is very much present in these films through the types of characters portrayed and common themes of displacement and isolation. In looking at representation of middle-class women and men in British film of the post-war period, I examine the screen personae of Celia Johnson and Deborah Kerr, and Michael Redgrave and Alec Guinness. I look at how, through their various film incarnations, these four actors create screen personae of solid, dependable middle-class men and women, with their accompanying ideals of duty, community responsibility and obligation. I contextualize these identities in hardships of post-war life, using Angus Calder’s The People’s War. Focussing on Carol Reed’s The Third Man (1949) and Jules Dassin’s Night and the City (1951), I re-examine British film noir, suggesting these films reveal British vulnerability and anxieties about their own displacement by America during the so-called “American Occupation” of Britain.
    [Show full text]
  • Picture Show Annual (1929)
    Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2015 https://archive.org/details/pictureshowannua00amal_4 {Fox.) Gloria Swanson changes her pertonalil^ with every film she makes. ‘ Sadie Thompson ” is one of her latest Photo ; Iroini ChiJno0 John Gilbert, whose work as the Russian prirtce in “ His " Hour first brought him into far-flung fame, returns to a Russian role in his latest film. The Cossacks. Others irtclude “ Twelve " Miles Out, and “ Flesh and the Devil. Pkoto : Ruth HutHet Louise / Photo : Cent Robert Richet ^ola cNe^ri Princea Pola of the Screen anJ Society, tnhoae smouldering eyes and sudden i flashing smile are seen at their best “ % in The Secret Hour," plara M io bring to k the screen the life M k Rachel, the of great W i i \ French tragedierme. f Photo ; Irving ChiJnoff oMarion Davies, as the screens Phabe Throssel, the shy, demure heroine of Barrie's ** Quality Street, which marked a distinct de- parture from the sprightly roles in which she won so rrmch fame. Donald Colman, f>tro of many a romantic drama such as The Night of Love, “ The Magic Flame,” ar\d the screen version of Baroness Orczy's love-drama of Old Spain, * Leatherface," ai he appears in the last-rrtentioned film. Photo : Kenneth Alexander •V — — Picture Show Annual 9 Members of ihe old Triangle-Fine Sir Herbert Tree, Owen Moore, Arts Company. Reading from left and Wilfred Lucas. Seated, the to right, in the back ’’ow are i/I the celebrities are Douglas Fairbanks, Dorothy Gish, Seena Owen and Bessie Love, Constance Talmadge, Norma Talmadge.
    [Show full text]