Organic Production Systems Guidelines

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Organic Production Systems Guidelines Organic Production Systems Guidelines ! Beef ! Wheat ! Grapes and Wines ! Oranges ! Carrots By S McCoy and G Parlevliet Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation Organic Produce Research and Development RIRDC Publication No 00/189 ! RIRDC Project No DAW-85A © 2001 Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation. All rights reserved. ISBN 0 642 58220 3 ISSN 1440-6845 Organic Production Systems Guidelines Publication No. 00/189 Project No. DAW-85A (Stage Two) The views expressed and the conclusions reached in this publication are those of the author and not necessarily those of persons consulted. RIRDC shall not be responsible in any way whatsoever to any person who relies in whole or in part on the contents of this report. This publication is copyright. However, RIRDC encourages wide dissemination of its research, providing the Corporation is clearly acknowledged. For any other enquiries concerning reproduction, contact the Publications Manager on phone 02 6272 3186. Researcher Contact Details S. McCoy and G. Parlevliet Organic Farming Project Centre for New Industry Development Agriculture Western Australia Locked Bag No. 4 BENTLEY DELIVERY CENTRE WA 6983 Phone: (08) 9368 3219 Fax: (08) 9368 3946 Email: [email protected] RIRDC Contact Details Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation Level 1, AMA House 42 Macquarie Street BARTON ACT 2600 PO Box 4776 KINGSTON ACT 2604 Phone: 02 6272 4539 Fax: 02 6272 5877 Email: [email protected]. Website: http://www.rirdc.gov.au Published in April 2001 Printed on environmentally friendly paper by Union Offset Printers ii Foreword Consumer interest in agricultural production methods regarding safety, health and the environment has increased in the highly developed affluent markets of the world. Agriculture Western Australia in conjunction with RIRDC recognise this as an opportunity to develop export markets based on ‘organic’ and ‘clean’ agricultural production systems. In order to capture a share of these expanding markets, the Australian organic agriculture industry must develop supply capability matched to market demands. Information on target markets and target products contained in the companion Stage One report ‘The Export Market Potential for Clean and Organic Agriculture’ is important to attract and focus investment in the industry. Five products; beef, wheat, wine, oranges and carrots were selected for priority development. This publication forms Stage Two of the Organic Farming Project that aims to increase the export opportunity for clean and organic agriculture. The report outlines organic production system guidelines for each of the five priority products. Details are provided of strategies and methods used by organic growers. The report aims to assist conventional growers with interest in developing agricultural production systems that can be certified organic or biodynamic in compliance with Australian ‘National Standards for Organic and Biodynamic Agriculture’ for export. This project was funded from RIRDC Core Funds which are provided by the Federal Government and is an addition to RIRDC’s diverse range of over 600 research publications. It forms part of our Organic Products R&D program, which aims to optimise the profitability of Australian organic production in domestic and overseas markets and to promote the utilisation of organic farming systems as a means of enhancing the sustainability of Australian agricultural systems. Most of our publications are available for viewing, downloading or purchasing online through our website: • downloads at www.rirdc.gov.au/reports/Index.htm • purchases at www.rirdc.gov.au/eshop Peter Core Managing Director Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation iii Acknowledgments The authors of this report would like to thank the many people who have provided generously of their time and knowledge. Especially Jeff Hastings, Program Manager of the New Industries Program, Agriculture Western Australia and Brian Stynes, former Program Manager, who provided the support to initiate this project. The New Industries Partnership Group who supported the direction. RIRDC for support and guidance. The contribution of the many experienced organic and biodynamic growers who generously provided practical information and guidance is greatly appreciated and reflects the general willingness among organic growers to support the development of organic and biodynamic agricultural systems. The many agency staff in Departments of Primary Industry or Agriculture in all Australian states for providing information and assistance. iv Contents Foreword............................................................................................................................... iii Acknowledgments .................................................................................................................iv Executive Summary ............................................................................................................. vii 1. Introduction....................................................................................................................... 1 2. Product Distinction and Premium Markets ....................................................................... 2 3. Organic Standards and Certification ................................................................................. 5 3.1 Background - Organic/biodynamic certification and regulations in Australia............. 5 3.2 General requirements - organic certification ............................................................ 6 3.3 Step involved in obtaining organic certification......................................................... 7 4. Organic Beef Production Guidelines ................................................................................10 4.1 Introduction.............................................................................................................10 4.2 Market outlook for organic beef ..............................................................................11 4.3 General principles - organic beef production.........................................................12 4.4 Production strategies and methods - organic beef ................................................16 4.5 Whole farm planning...............................................................................................16 4.6 Soil fertility management ........................................................................................17 4.7 Areas for future research ........................................................................................33 4.8 Selected references................................................................................................34 5. Wheat - Organic Production Guidelines ...........................................................................37 5.1 Introduction.............................................................................................................37 5.2 Market outlook for organic wheat ............................................................................38 5.3 General principles - organic wheat production ......................................................39 5.4 Production strategies and methods - organic wheat..............................................41 5.5 Organic wheat production system...........................................................................52 5.6 Areas for future research ........................................................................................56 5.7 Selected references................................................................................................57 6. Grapes and Wine - Organic Production Guidelines.........................................................58 6.1 Overview ................................................................................................................58 6.2 Introduction - Australia as a source of organic wine ..............................................58 6.3 Market trends..........................................................................................................59 6.4 Organic standards, requirements and certification ..................................................61 6.5 Starting an organic vineyard ...................................................................................64 6.6 Converting existing vineyards .................................................................................64 6.7 Starting a new vineyard ..........................................................................................65 6.8 Management of an established organic vineyard ....................................................71 6.9 Making wine from organic grapes ...........................................................................85 6.10 Yields and Costs.....................................................................................................88 6.11 Research needs .....................................................................................................89 6.12 Conclusion..............................................................................................................89 6.13 References .............................................................................................................90 v 7. Oranges - A Production Guide to Growing Organic Oranges in Australia........................95 7.1 Background ............................................................................................................95
Recommended publications
  • Organic Horticulture in India
    horticulturae Communication Organic Horticulture in India Sisir Mitra 1,* and Hidangmayum Devi 2 1 Section Tropical and Subtropical Fruits, International Society for Horticultural Science, Faculty of Horticulture, Bidhan Chandra Krishi ViswaVidyalaya, Mohanpur, B-12/48, Kalyani, Nadia, West Bengal 741252, India 2 Indian Council of Agriculture Research complex for NEH Region, Tripura Centre, Lembucherra, West Tripura 799210, India; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +91-943-217-4249 Academic Editor: Douglas D. Archbold Received: 1 December 2015; Accepted: 27 September 2016; Published: 26 October 2016 Abstract: During the previous three decades, organic produce has attracted the attention of a growing health-conscious population across the globe. Both international and domestic communities are becoming aware of issues like agrochemical residues, produce quality, and food safety. Worldwide, over 37.5 million ha of land (0.87% of total agricultural land) is being managed organically by 1.9 million producers in 164 countries. In addition, there is another 31 million ha certified for wild harvest collection. Global sales of organic products have reached U.S. $75 billion, with the U.S. and Europe as the largest consumers. The concept of organic farming is not new to the Indian farming community. Several forms of organic farming are successfully practiced in diverse climates, particularly in rain-fed, tribal mountains, and hilly areas of the country. Many of the forest products of economic importance, such as herbs and medicinal plants are in this category by default. The report of the Task Force on Organic Farming appointed by the Government of India noted the vast areas of the country where limited amounts of synthetic chemicals are used, although they have low productivity, but also which could have unexploited potential for organic agriculture.
    [Show full text]
  • Comprehensive Assessment of Organic Apple Production in Vermont: Experience from Two Orchard Systems, 2006-2013 Terence L
    University of Vermont ScholarWorks @ UVM Graduate College Dissertations and Theses Dissertations and Theses 2015 Comprehensive Assessment of Organic Apple Production in Vermont: Experience from Two Orchard Systems, 2006-2013 Terence L. Bradshaw University of Vermont Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.uvm.edu/graddis Part of the Agricultural Economics Commons, and the Horticulture Commons Recommended Citation Bradshaw, Terence L., "Comprehensive Assessment of Organic Apple Production in Vermont: Experience from Two Orchard Systems, 2006-2013" (2015). Graduate College Dissertations and Theses. 327. https://scholarworks.uvm.edu/graddis/327 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Dissertations and Theses at ScholarWorks @ UVM. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate College Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks @ UVM. For more information, please contact [email protected]. COMPREHENSIVE ASSESSMENT OF ORGANIC APPLE PRODUCTION IN VERMONT: EXPERIENCE FROM TWO ORCHARD SYSTEMS, 2006-2013 A Dissertation Presented by Terence L. Bradshaw to The Faculty of the Graduate College of The University of Vermont In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Specializing in Plant and Soil Science May, 2015 Defense Date: March 25, 2014 Dissertation Examination Committee: Josef H. Gorres, Ph. D., Advisor Robert L. Parsons, Ph.D., Chairperson Lorraine P. Berkett, Ph.D. Sidney C. Bosworth, Ph.D. Cynthia J. Forehand, Ph.D., Dean of the Graduate College ABSTRACT Despite substantial consumer demand and willingness to pay premium prices for organically grown fruit, apple growers in Vermont and other New England states have been slow to adopt certified organic practices.
    [Show full text]
  • Effect of Different Organic Wastes on Soil Pro- Perties and Plant Growth and Yield: a Review
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES EFFECT OF DIFFERENT ORGANIC WASTES ON SOIL PRO- pertieS AND PLANT GROWTH AND YIELD: A REVIEW M.Z. Hossain1, P. von Fragstein und Niemsdorff2, J. Heß2 1Khulna University, Agrotechnology Discipline, Khulna, Bangladesh 2University of Kassel, Faculty of Organic Agricultural Sciences, Department of Organic Farming and Cropping System, Nordbahnhofstr. 1a, 37213 Witzenhausen, Germany The use of organic wastes in agriculture plays a great role in recycling essential plant nutrients, sustaining soil security as well as protecting the environment from unwanted hazards. This review article deals with the effect of different kinds of organic wastes on soil properties and plant growth and yield. Municipal solid waste is mainly used as a source of nitrogen and organic matter, improving soil properties and microbial activity that are closely related to soil fertility. Biowaste and food waste in- crease pH, nitrogen content, cation exchange capacity, water holding capacity, and microbial biomass in soil. Sewage sludge contains various amounts of organic matter and huge amounts of plant nutrients. Manure is a common waste which improves soil properties by adding nutrients and increases microbial and enzyme activity in soil. It also reduces toxicity of some heavy metals. These organic wastes have a great positive impact on soil physical, chemical, and biological properties as well as stimulate plant growth and thus increase the yield of crops. municipal solid waste, soil nutrients, sewage sludge, food waste, manure doi: 10.1515/sab-2017-0030 Received for publication on October 14, 2016 Accepted for publication on April 22, 2017 INTRODUCTION puropse to improve soil properties and increase crop yield is a good solution for minimizing these problems.
    [Show full text]
  • Garden Organic (Formerly Known As HDRA - the Henry Doubleday Research Association) Is the UK’S Leading Organic Growing Charity
    Composting for Gardeners Image credit: iStock/Allkindza Composting for Gardeners Garden Organic (formerly known as HDRA - the Henry Doubleday Research Association) is the UK’s leading organic growing charity. We have been at the forefront of the organic horticulture movement since 1958, with over 20,000 members across the UK and overseas. Dedicated to promoting organic gardening in homes, communities and schools, the charity encourages people to grow in the most sustainable way, and demonstrates the lasting benefi ts of organic growing to the health and wellbeing of individuals and the environment. For more information please visit www.gardenorganic.org.uk. Garden Organic is a registered charity in England and Wales (298104) and Scotland (SC046767). VAT no. 258 0869 69 Why make compost? Compost is nature’s black gold. It will help you grow healthy plants. And making it yourself reduces pollution, supports the natural environment, saves money and protects endangered natural habitats. How? By recycling your garden debris and kitchen scraps. It’s as simple as that. This book will tell you what to compost, how to make it, and how to use it. Compost makes your garden grow Compost, a rich soil-like material, works wonders in the growing area. It • lightens and breaks up heavy soils • bulks up light sandy soils and helps them hold more water • feeds plants and other vital soil organisms • helps control diseases Compost saves you money Home-made compost helps cut down on buying garden products. It acts as a • soil improver • fertiliser • mulch Compost helps reduce pollution Making compost contributes towards a cleaner environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Super-Compost at Missouri Organic 7700 E
    Soil Regeneration Super-Compost at Missouri Organic 7700 E. US 40 Highway, KC, MO 64129 Winter 2017 Since June 2016, a few of us have worked together to make a better commercial compost. Our team collaborated with the goal to produce a “premium compost” able to deliver consistent, reliable results for effective use in commercial food production, horticulture and landscaping. Kevin Anderson, Vice President of Missouri Organic, was enthusiastic, did his own research, contributed his own ideas and materials. Despite setbacks, Kevin persisted to advance this effort a huge leap forward. In a recent email, Kevin set the bar high for our first test batch by naming it carbon that increases water-holding capacity and improves "super-compost." I’m confident we can deliver that quality – fertilizer efficiency. This boosts Cation Exchange Capacity but maybe not fully on the first try. (CEC), and adds Anion Exchange Capacity (AEC) to also capture nitrogen and phosphorus. Finally, the biomass is Monday January 30, we built the first experimental inoculated by a broader diversity of microbes beyond the usual digesting bacteria. The ultimate result of these improvements is compost with measurably higher fertility, higher performance, higher yield, and higher quality crops. Our first experiment began as a 300-foot long, 900- cubic-yard windrow of ground yard waste, with restaurant and retail food waste. Assorted minerals were blended into biochar, then moistened with wood vinegar and sea minerals. This was spread on top of the windrow. After two passes with a compost turner, minerals and biochar were nicely, finely mixed into a soft, porous pile of biomass.
    [Show full text]
  • Innovative Strategies and Machines for Physical Weed Control in Organic and Integrated Vegetable Crops
    211 A publication of CHEMICAL ENGINEERING TRANSACTIONS The Italian Association VOL. 44, 2015 of Chemical Engineering Online at www.aidic.it/cet Guest Editors: Riccardo Guidetti, Luigi Bodria, Stanley Best Copyright © 2015, AIDIC Servizi S.r.l., ISBN 978-88-95608-35-8; ISSN 2283-9216 DOI: 10.3303/CET1544036 Innovative Strategies and Machines for Physical Weed Control in Organic and Integrated Vegetable Crops Marco Fontanelli*a, Christian Frasconia, Luisa Martellonib, Michel Pirchiob, Michele a a Raffaelli , Andrea Peruzzi aDepartment of Agriculture Food and Environment, University of Pisa, Via del Borghetto 80, 56124, Pisa, Italy b Centro di Ricerche Agro-Ambientali “Enrico Avanzi”, Università di Pisa, Via vecchia di Marina 6, 56122, San PIero a Grado, Pisa, Italy [email protected] Weed control is one of the most serious problems in vegetable crops, limiting cultivated plants correct development, yields, product quality and farmers income. Therefore, the aim of this work was to set up and improve innovative strategies and machines for physical (mechanical and thermal) weed control in organic or “integrated” vegetables production in many important areas of Northern, Central and Southern Italy. Therefore, on-farm experiments were carried out since 1999 on fresh marketable spinach, processing and fresh market tomato, cauliflower, savoy cabbage, greenhouse cultivated leaf beet, garlic, chicory, fennel and carrot. These research activities started are still ongoing. The traditional farm weed management system was always compared to one or more innovative strategies that were defined according to the characteristics of the environment (i.e. soil type and conditions, water availability, etc.), typology of cultivation, crop rotation, expected technical and economical results.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparison of Financial Returns During Early Transition from Conventional to Organic Vegetable Production
    78.713 D46 4P-94-12 Working Papers Series Working Paper WP94/12 October 1994 WAITE MEMORIAL SOUK COLLECTION DEPT'. OF AG. AND APPUED ECONOMICS 1994 BUFORD AVE. -232 COB UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA ST. PAUL, MN 55108 U.S.A. A COMPARISON OF FINANCIAL RETURNS DURING EARLY TRANSITION FROM CONVENTIONAL TO ORGANIC VEGETABLE PRODUCTION by Daniel Sellen Jeff H. Tolman D. Glenn R. McLeod Alfons Weersink Emmanuel K. Yiridoe UNIVERSITY piGUELPH Department ofAgricultural Economics and Business University of Guelph Guelph, Ontario Canada N1G 2W1 . 37S.7/3 646 to /649-/ A COMPARISON OF FINANCIAL RETURNS DURING EARLY TRANSITION FROM CONVENTIONAL TO ORGANIC VEGETABLE PRODUCTION by Daniel Sellenl Jeff H. Tolman2 D. Glenn R. McLeod2 Alfons Weersinkl Emmanuel K. Yiridoel WAITE MEMORIAL BOOK COLLECTION DEPT. OF AG. AND APPLIED ECONOMICS 1994 BUFORD AVE. - 232 COB UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA ST. PAUL, MN 55108 U.S.A. 1Department of Agricultural Economics and Business, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1; 2Research Centre, Research Branch, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, 1391 Sandford St., London, Ontario, N5V 4T3. WORKING PAPERS ARE PUBLISHED WITHOUT FORMAL REVIEW WITHIN THE DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS c, A COMPARISON OF FINANCIAL RETURNS DURING EARLY TRANSITION FROM CONVENTIONAL TO ORGANIC VEGETABLE PRODUCTION ABSTRACT Relative profitability was compared for five vegetables (sweet corn, green bean, cabbage, tomato, Spanish onion) during the second and third years of transition from conventional to organic production practice. Input and output data developed in field experiments in 1991 and 1992 revealed average organic yields were significantly lower than those from conventional production systems. jDecreases ranged from 8 percent for green bearho 45 percent for tomato Input costs were generally higher for organically grown crops than for those produced conventionally.
    [Show full text]
  • Weed Biology and Weed Management in Organic Farming
    We are IntechOpen, the world’s leading publisher of Open Access books Built by scientists, for scientists 5,400 134,000 165M Open access books available International authors and editors Downloads Our authors are among the 154 TOP 1% 12.2% Countries delivered to most cited scientists Contributors from top 500 universities Selection of our books indexed in the Book Citation Index in Web of Science™ Core Collection (BKCI) Interested in publishing with us? Contact [email protected] Numbers displayed above are based on latest data collected. For more information visit www.intechopen.com 10 Weed Biology and Weed Management in Organic Farming Anneli Lundkvist and Theo Verwijst Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU) Sweden 1. Introduction Weed biology, including the ecology, physiology and population dynamics of weed species, does not differ from plant biology apart from the notion that the plants under investigation are considered to be “unwanted”. Weeds are unwanted and undesirable plants which interfere with the utilization of land and water resources and thus adversely affect human welfare (Rao, 1999). Weed biology research consequently aims to generate knowledge that is expected to be applied in the practical control of weeds, and should include integrated research, from basic to applied, with all elements contributing to real improvements in weed management (Moss, 2008). Management of weeds is performed for the benefit of different interests, ranging from clean and non slippery pavements, to minimizing yield losses in agriculture. The occurrence of weeds in agricultural crops leads to substantial yield reductions causing economic losses all over the world. Crop damage from weeds generally is larger than from other pests (Oerke, 2006).
    [Show full text]
  • Therapeutic and Inclusive Organic Horticulture: an University- Society Collaborative Learning Experience
    EGU2020-8063 https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu2020-8063 EGU General Assembly 2020 © Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Therapeutic and inclusive organic horticulture: an University- society collaborative learning experience Juana Labrador1, Aída Pérez2, Marta M. Moreno3, and Francisco Pérez-Vera2 1University of Extremadura, Badajoz. Spain 2Fundación Sorapán de Rieros, Badajoz . Spain 3University of Castilla-La Mancha, School of Agricultural Engineering / Escuela de Ingenieros Agrónomos, Vegetal Production and Agriculture Technology, Ciudad Real, Spain Therapeutic horticulture is a discipline which belongs to both society and health sciences that has its own identity, which differentiates it from others. It arises as a result of the complementary fusion of two disciplines: horticulture and therapy or rehabilitation. In the therapeutic field, it incorporates some knowledges about physical, cognitive and sensory disabilities, different pathologies, psychosocial problems and special needs. Around horticulture, it allows us to develop knowledge about agriculture, gardening, landscaping, environment and others. It has been used, for educational and socialization purposes, for more than half a century, since then with great implantation and recognition in many countries. The implementation of an organic garden with pedagogical purposes for students of Agroecology in the School of Agricultural Engineering of the University of Extremadura (Spain), has been the scene for the realization of a collaborative project of integrative - teaching - learning strategy between the University and the “Sorapán de Rieros” Foundation. This project has allowed the use of the ecological orchard created for pedagogical purposes based on the needs of students with mental disorders of different nature with whom the Foundation works, connecting then different points of view.
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of Soil Remineralization by Rock Dust on the Emergence and Early Growth of Banana (Musa Acuminata) Smart M.O., Adesida O.A., Okunlola T.O., Isola J.O
    GSJ: Volume 7, Issue 9, September 2019 ISSN 2320-9186 763 GSJ: Volume 7, Issue 9, September 2019, Online: ISSN 2320-9186 www.globalscientificjournal.com EFFECTS OF SOIL REMINERALIZATION BY ROCK DUST ON THE EMERGENCE AND EARLY GROWTH OF BANANA (MUSA ACUMINATA) SMART M.O., ADESIDA O.A., OKUNLOLA T.O., ISOLA J.O ABSTRACT The study evaluated the effects of soil remineralization by rock dust on the emergence and early growth of Banana (Musa acuminata). Pot experiments were conducted to determine the effect of remineralization of soil using granite and basalt rock dusts as soil remineralizers. There were seven treatments including control used for the experiment and these were replicated four times. The treatments were T1 (0.5tons/ha of granite dust per 2kg of top soil), T2 (0.5tons/ha of basalt dust per 2kg of top soil), T3 (1.0tons/ha of granite dust per 2kg of top soil), T4 (1.0tons/ha of basalt dust per 2kg of top soil), T5 (1.5tons/ha of granite dust per 2kg of top soil), T6 (1.5tons/ha of basalt dust per 2kg of top soil), T7 (Control). The experiment was laid out in Completely Randomized Design (CRD). Data were collected on days of emergence, number of leaves, plant height (cm) and stem girth (cm) for 5 weeks. Watering was done twice daily both in the morning and evening. Data collected were subjected to Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) and no significance means among the treatments except for number of leaves at 0.05 level of significance. The results showed that T6 (1.5tons/ha basalt) had the best mean days to emergence (16.75) while T7 (control) had the least mean performance for emergence (33.50).
    [Show full text]
  • Bioherbicides in Organic Horticulture
    horticulturae Review Bioherbicides in Organic Horticulture Xiaoya Cai and Mengmeng Gu * Department of Horticultural Sciences, Texas A&M AgriLife Extension Service, College Station, TX 77843, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-979-845-8657; Fax: +1-979-845-8906 Academic Editor: Douglas D. Archbold Received: 8 October 2015; Accepted: 4 January 2016; Published: 29 March 2016 Abstract: Organic horticulture producers rank weeds as one of their most troublesome, time-consuming, and costly production problems. With the increasing significance of organic horticulture, the need for new bioherbicides to control weeds has grown. Potential bioherbicides may be developed from pathogens, natural products, and extracts of natural materials. Fungal and bacteria pathogens are two important types of microbial agents that have potential to be used as bioherbicides. The byproducts of natural sources such as dried distillers grains with solubles (DDGS), corn gluten meal (CGM), and mustard seed meals (MSMs) have shown herbicidal activities in controlling many weed species. Some essential oil extracts have shown bioherbicide potential as well. The efficacy of a bioherbicide is the main limiting factor for its application, and it may be affected by environmental factors such as humidity and moisture, the application method, the spectrum of the bioherbicide, and the type of formulation. In addition to efficacy, costs and concerns about potential human health threats are also limitations to bioherbicide use. As the integration of bioherbicide technology into current weed management systems may help manage herbicide resistance, reduce production costs, and increase crop yields, future research should involve the development of more cost-effective and efficient bioherbicides for control of weeds, as well as the optimization of production methods and cultural practices with use of candidate bioherbicides.
    [Show full text]
  • IFOAM Organics International: Vision, Activities and R&D/I Agenda Setting for Organic Horticulture
    IFOAM Organics International: Vision, Activities and R&D/I Agenda Setting for Organic Horticulture Uygun Aksoy, IFOAM Organics International Markus Arbenz, IFOAM International Executive Director 11 April, 2016 Aksoy & Arbenz; IFOAM Organics International; 3rd ISHS OGH İzmir-Turkey Outline 1. Description of IFOAM Organics International 2. Organic Policy 2.1. Standards and role of IFOAM Organics International 2.2. Organic 3.0 3. Major Activities 3.1. Projects 3.2. World Congress and other activities 4. Sector Platforms 4.1. Seeds 4.2. TIPI 4.3. INOFO 5. Conclusion 2 IFOAM Organics International Historical Background • The International Federation of Organic Agriculture Movements (IFOAM) is the worldwide umbrella organization for the organic movement, which represents close to 800 affiliates in 100 countries , • Founded in Versailles, France, on November 5, 1972, during an international congress on organic agriculture, • Five founding members representing different organizations: Lady Eve Balfour representing the Soil Association of Great Britain, Kjell Arman representing the Swedish Biodynamic Association , Pauline Raphaely representing the Soil Association of South Africa , Jerome Goldstein representing Rodale Press of the United States, and Roland Chevriot representing Nature et Progrès of France decided to have a unified and organized voice. 3 World Board 4 General Assembly GA: Every three years during the World Congress 18th Organic World Congress (13-15 october 2014) held in Istanbul/TURKEY 5 Organic Agriculture offers the world an alternative to address global challenges Food security • Climate change mitigation/adaptation Biodiversity conservation Sustainable natural resources (water, soil) 6 • Principles of OA • Definition of OA • Scope of OA • Family of Standards • IFOAM positions • IFOAM policy briefs • IFOAM Best Practice Guidelines 7 Other terms used are: Bio, Biological, Eco, Ecological, Ecological Organic Agriculture, Agro-ecological Farming, Low Input Agriculture, Sustainable Agriculture, Natural Farming, Biodynamic, Permaculture etc.
    [Show full text]