DOCSLIB.ORG

Osteobrama Bhimensis (Cypriniformes: Cyprinidae): a Junior Synonym of O

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Osteobrama Bhimensis (Cypriniformes: Cyprinidae): a Junior Synonym of O JoTT COMMUNI C ATION 3(9): 2078–2084 Osteobrama bhimensis (Cypriniformes: Cyprinidae): a junior synonym of O. vigorsii Shrikant S. Jadhav 1, Mandar Paingankar 2 & Neelesh Dahanukar 3 1 Zoological Survey of India, Western Regional Centre, Vidyanagar, Akurdi, Pune, Maharashtra 411044, India 2 Prerana Heights, Flat No. B13, Balaji Nagar, Dhankawadi, Pune, Maharashtra 411043, India 3 Indian Institute of Science Education and Research, Sai Trinity, Garware Circle, Pune, Maharashtra 411021, India Email: 1 [email protected], 2 [email protected], 3 [email protected] (corresponding author) Date of publication (online): 26 September 2011 Abstract: Osteobrama bhimensis (Singh & Yazdani) was described from the Ujani Date of publication (print): 26 September 2011 wetland on Bhima River in Maharashtra, India, about 100 km downstream of the type ISSN 0974-7907 (online) | 0974-7893 (print) locality of O. vigorsii (Sykes). Based on examination of the type material of O. bhimensis and comparison with O. vigorsii collected from different localities in the Krishna and Editor: Anonymity requested Godavari River systems, we show that O. bhimensis is conspecific with O. vigorsii. Manuscript details: Ms # o2841 Keywords: Conspecific, junior synonym, Osteobrama bhimensis, Rohtee vigorsii. Received 22 June 2011 Final received 17 July 2011 Finally accepted 15 August 2011 INTRODUCTION Citation: Jadhav, S.S., M. Paingankar & N. Dahanukar (2011). Osteobrama bhimensis (Cypriniformes:Cyprinidae): a junior synonym of O. vigorsii. Journal of Threatened Taxa 3(9): Sykes (1839) described Rohtee vigorsii (now Osteobrama) from the 2078–2084. Bhima River at Pairgaon (approx. 18.5060N & 74.7040E). Although Copyright: © Shrikant S. Jadhav, Mandar the types of this species are missing (Eschmeyer & Fricke 2011), Sykes Paingankar & Neelesh Dahanukar 2011. Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported (1841) provided a clear illustration of the species and gave an adequate License. JoTT allows unrestricted use of this description for purposes of identification. The species is widely distributed article in any medium for non-profit purposes, reproduction and distribution by providing in the Krishna, Godavari and Mahanadi river systems of peninsular India adequate credit to the authors and the source of publication. and is common throughout its range (Dahanukar 2011). Singh & Yazdani (1992) described Osteobrama bhimensis from the Ujani Wetland on Author Detail: SHRIKANT S. JADHAV is Scientist A at the Zoological Survey of India, Western Bhima River, about 100km downstream of the type locality of O. vigorsii. Regional Centre, Pune. He works on taxonomy and distribution of freshwater fishes and has Osteobrama bhimensis has since been considered a valid species by most published several papers in this area. MANDAR authors (e.g., Menon 1999; Jayaram 2010). Even though Singh & Yazdani PAINGANKAR is a molecular biologist and works on vector biology with an emphasis on host (1992) considered O. bhimensis to be closely related to O. cotio, owing to parasite interactions. He works on animal ecology as a hobby. NEELE S H DAHANUKAR works the lack of barbels, their figure ofO. bhimensis resembles O. vigorsii more in ecology and evolution with an emphasis on than it does O. cotio. Singh & Yazdani (1992) did, however, mention the mathematical and statistical analysis. He is also interested in taxonomy, distribution patterns and similarity between O. bhimensis and O. vigorsii and sought to distinguish molecular phylogeny of freshwater fishes. the two species through a number of characters (discussed below). Author Contribution: SSJ and ND put forth the Recently we had an opportunity to study all the type material, concept. SSJ, MP and ND collected the data, analyzed the data and wrote the paper. comprising the holotype and five paratypes, of O. bhimensis currently in Acknowledgements: We are thankful to Dr. the collection of the Zoological Survey of India, Western Regional Centre, R.M. Sharma, Scientist-D and Officer-in-charge, Pune. We compared the type material of O. bhimensis with specimens Zoological Survey of India, Western Regional Centre, Akurdi, Pune, and Dr. G.M. Yazdani for of O. vigorsii from the Krishna and Godavari river systems. Our study encouragement and support. We are grateful to Varsha Mysker for providing two specimens suggests that O. bhimensis and O. vigorsii are conspecific. of Osteobrama vigorsii from Bhima River at Kollakur, Karnataka. We are also grateful to two anonymous referees for critical comments on an earlier draft of our manuscript. METHODS Data collection The type material of Osteobrama bhimensis, comprising of the OPEN ACCESS | FREE DOWNLOAD holotype and five paratypes, was available in the fish collection of the 2078 Journal of Threatened Taxa | www.threatenedtaxa.org | September 2011 | 3(9): 2078–2084 Osteobrama bhimensis synonymy S.S. Jadhav et al. Zoological Survey of India, Western Regional Centre, Aurangabad, collected on 13.x.1999 by P.P. Kulkarni. Pune (ZSI Pune). Specimens of O. vigorsii and O. Osteobrama cotio peninsularis: 1 ex., WILD-11- cotio peninsularis were available in the Wildlife PIS-015, Mula-Mutha River at Yerawada (18.5420N Information Liaison Development, Coimbatore & 73.8770E), collected on 07.i.2011 by N. Dahanukar (WILD) and ZSI Pune. Morphometric and meristic & M. Paingankar; 1 ex., ZSI Pune P/2595, Indrayani data were recorded following Jayaram (2010). River at Markal (18.6730N & 73.9840E), collected Measurements were taken point to point using dial during 2009–2010 by N. Dahanukar & M. Paingankar; calipers to the nearest hundredth of an inch and then 1 ex., ZSI Pune P/2443, Nira River at Bhor (18.1530N & converted to millimetres. Subunits of the body are 73.8430E), collected on 01.i.2011 by N. Dahanukar & presented as a percent of standard length (SL) and M. Paingankar; 1 ex., ZSI Pune P/2684, Mula River at subunits of the head are presented as a percent of Paud (18.5290N & 73.6110E), collected on 08.vi.2011 head length (HL). All pored scales were counted for by N. Dahanukar & M. Paingankar; 3 ex., ZSI Pune reporting the lateral lines scales. We dissected three P/2685, Mula-Mutha River at Yerawada (18.5430N & specimens of O. vigorsii (P/2671, 110mm SL; P/2672, 73.8790E), collected on 16.vi.2011 by N. Dahanukar 105mm SL and P/2673, 128mm SL) to resolve the & M. Paingankar. structure of the urohyal bone. Material examined RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Osteobrama bhimensis: Holotype, 06.ix.1989, Bhima River, Saha Village (approx. 18.1330N & One of the most important characters that Singh 75.0930E), Indapur Taluka, Pune District, Maharashtra, & Yazdani (1992) used for diagnosing Osteobrama coll. D.F. Singh (ZSI Pune P/1235). Paratypes, 5 ex., bhimensis was the absence of barbels. Our study of collection data same as holotype (ZSI Pune P/1236). the type material of O. bhimensis revealed that the Osteobrama vigorsii: 1 ex., WILD-11-PIS-017, holotype and all the paratypes of O. bhimensis do in Mula-Mutha River at Yerawada (18.5420N & fact possess a pair of rudimentary maxillary barbels 73.8770E), collected on 14.i.2011 by N. Dahanukar & (Image 1), a character state also present in O. vigorsii. M. Paingankar; 1 ex., ZSI Pune P/2670, Bhima River at Koregaon-Bhima (18.6470N & 74.0540E), collected on 25.v.2011 by N. Dahanukar & M. Paingankar; 1 ex., ZSI Pune P/2672, Mula-Mutha River at Yerawada (18.5420N & 73.8770E), collected on 07.i.2011 by N. Dahanukar & M. Paingankar; 1 ex., ZSI Pune P/2673, Krishna River at Wai (17.9560N & 73.8790E), collected in March 2011 by N. Dahanukar & M. Paingankar; 1 ex., ZSI Pune P/2671, Nira River at Bhor (18.1530N, 73.8430E), collected in December 2009 by N. Dahanukar & M. Paingankar; 1 ex., ZSI Pune P/2674, Wasumbre tank (approx. 17.2980N, 74.5790E) in Sangli District, collected on 16.vi.1979 by A.S. Mahabal; 1 ex., ZSI Pune P/2676, Mutha River at Warje (18.4810N, 73.8160E), collected on 24 February 1999 by N. Dahanukar; 1 ex., ZSI Pune P/2675, Mula River at Aundh (18.5680N & 73.8110E), collected on 02.vi.1999 by N. Dahanukar; 2 ex., unregistered, Bhima River at Kollakur (17.0860N & 76.7640E), collected on 10.v.2011 by Varsha Mysker; 3 ex., ZSI Pune P/2105, Godavari River at Kaigaon Image 1. Rudimentary maxillary barbels in Osteobrama bhimensis (a) holotype (ZSI Pune P/1235) and (b) one of the (approx. 19.6240N, 75.0260E) in Gangapur Taluka, paratypes (ZSI Pune P/1236). Journal of Threatened Taxa | www.threatenedtaxa.org | September 2011 | 3(9): 2078–2084 2079 Osteobrama bhimensis synonymy S.S. Jadhav et al. Indeed, if the character state ‘barbels present’ were (1992). Interestingly, Singh & Yazdani (1992) did applied to specimens of O. bhimensis using Singh & not compare O. bhimensis with O. cotio peninsularis Yazdani’s (1992) own key, the species keys out as O. described by Silas (1952) from Poona [= Pune], which vigorsii. is close to the type locality of O. bhimensis. Our Singh & Yazdani (1992) suggested that O. comparison suggests that O. bhimensis differs from O. bhimensis is related to O. cotio and compared it with cotio peninsularis in a number of characters including two subspecies of O. cotio, namely O. cotio cotio ii22–ii24 (vs. ii27–ii32 in O. c. peninsularis) anal fin and O. cotio cunma. Even though these authors rays, 26-30 (vs. 17–18) predorsal scales, 72–79 (vs. did not explicitly mention why they consider O. 55–56) lateral-line scales and head length 26.0–28.3 bhimensis to be affined to O. cotio, it appears they % SL (vs. 22.3–24.0 % SL). considered the absence of barbels in O. bhimensis The type material of O. bhimensis and the figure to be synapomorphic in the O. bhimensis-O. cotio given in Singh & Yazdani (1992, fig. 1), however, is group. Our data, however, does not suggest a closer consistent with Sykes’ (1842) description and figure relationship between O.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 203Rd Anniversary of the Bhima-Koregaon Battle
    203rd Anniversary of the Bhima-Koregaon Battle drishtiias.com/printpdf/203rd-anniversary-of-the-bhima-koregaon-battle Why in News The victory pillar (also known as Ranstambh or Jaystambh) in Bhima-Koregaon village (Pune district of Maharashtra) celebrated the 203rd anniversary of the Bhima- Koregaon battle of 1818 on 1st January, 2021. In 2018, incidents of violent clashes between Dalit and Maratha groups were registered during the celebration of the 200th anniversary of the Bhima-Koregaon battle. Key Points 1/2 Historical Background: A battle was fought in Bhima Koregaon between the Peshwa forces and the British on 1st January, 1818. The British army, which comprised mainly of Dalit soldiers, fought the upper caste-dominated Peshwa army. The British troops defeated the Peshwa army. Peshwa Bajirao II had insulted the Mahar community and terminated them from the service of his army. This caused them to side with the English against the Peshwa’s numerically superior army. Mahar, caste-cluster, or group of many endogamous castes, living chiefly in Maharashtra state and in adjoining states. They mostly speak Marathi, the official language of Maharashtra. They are officially designated Scheduled Castes. The defeat of Peshwa army was considered to be a victory against caste-based discrimination and oppression. It was one of the last battles of the Third Anglo-Maratha War (1817-18), which ended the Peshwa domination. Babasaheb Ambedkar’s visit to the site on 1st January, 1927, revitalised the memory of the battle for the Dalit community, making it a rallying point and an assertion of pride. The Victory Pillar Memorial: It was erected by the British in Perne village in the district for the soldiers killed in the Koregaon Bhima battle.
    [Show full text]
  • Odia: Dhudhiya Magara / Sorrah Magara / Haladia Magara
    FISH AND SHELLFISH DIVERSITY AND ITS SUSTAINABLE MANAGEMENT IN CHILIKA LAKE V. R. Suresh, S. K. Mohanty, R. K. Manna, K. S. Bhatta M. Mukherjee, S. K. Karna, A. P. Sharma, B. K. Das A. K. Pattnaik, Susanta Nanda & S. Lenka 2018 ICAR- Central Inland Fisheries Research Institute Barrackpore, Kolkata - 700 120 (India) & Chilika Development Authority C- 11, BJB Nagar, Bhubaneswar- 751 014 (India) FISH AND SHELLFISH DIVERSITY AND ITS SUSTAINABLE MANAGEMENT IN CHILIKA LAKE V. R. Suresh, S. K. Mohanty, R. K. Manna, K. S. Bhatta, M. Mukherjee, S. K. Karna, A. P. Sharma, B. K. Das, A. K. Pattnaik, Susanta Nanda & S. Lenka Photo editing: Sujit Choudhury and Manavendra Roy ISBN: 978-81-938914-0-7 Citation: Suresh, et al. 2018. Fish and shellfish diversity and its sustainable management in Chilika lake, ICAR- Central Inland Fisheries Research Institute, Barrackpore, Kolkata and Chilika Development Authority, Bhubaneswar. 376p. Copyright: © 2018. ICAR-Central Inland Fisheries Research Institute (CIFRI), Barrackpore, Kolkata and Chilika Development Authority, C-11, BJB Nagar, Bhubaneswar. Reproduction of this publication for educational or other non-commercial purposes is authorized without prior written permission from the copyright holders provided the source is fully acknowledged. Reproduction of this publication for resale or other commercial purposes is prohibited without prior written permission from the copyright holders. Photo credits: Sujit Choudhury, Manavendra Roy, S. K. Mohanty, R. K. Manna, V. R. Suresh, S. K. Karna, M. Mukherjee and Abdul Rasid Published by: Chief Executive Chilika Development Authority C-11, BJB Nagar, Bhubaneswar-751 014 (Odisha) Cover design by: S. K. Mohanty Designed and printed by: S J Technotrade Pvt.
    [Show full text]
  • Pune District Geographical Area
    73°20'0"E 73°30'0"E 73°40'0"E 73°50'0"E 74°0'0"E 74°10'0"E 74°20'0"E 74°30'0"E 74°40'0"E 74°50'0"E 75°0'0"E 75°10'0"E PUNE DISTRICT GEOGRAPHICAL AREA To war a ds K ad (MAHARASHTRA) aly nw an- ha Dom m bi ra vali B P ds imp r a a l ¤£N g w H a o -2 T 19°20'0"N E o KEY MAP 2 2 n N Jo m 19°20'0"N g a A e D CA-01 TH THANE DINGORE 46 H CA-02 # S ta OTUR o Ma # B n JUNNAR s CA-03 ik AHMADNAGAR /" rd Doh D a ± CA-04 am w PUNE GEOGRAPHICAL o AREA (MNGL) TO BE CA-10 EXCLUDED FROM PUNE T DISTRICT GEOGRAPHICAL AREA UMBRAJ 0 # -5 CA-01 H N£ CA-05 DHALEWADI TARF HAVELI ¤ CA-09 CA-11 # Y ed ALE gaon Re T servoir Lake # ow 2 CA-06 22 a CA-08 H- r 19°10'0"N d RAJURI N s RAIGARH # £¤ T 19°10'0"N ak CA-07 CA-12 #NARAYANGAON #BORI BK. li D ho CA-13 ke Dim WARULWADI BELHE sh SOLAPUR bhe # w SATARA Da # S a m H r 5 1 KALAMB Total Population within the Geographical Area as per Census 2011 # T ow 46.29 Lacs (Approx.) GHODEGAON ar Total Geographical Area (Sq KMs) No. of Charge Areas ds S /" CA-02 H 1 Sh 14590 13 12 MANCHAR (CT) iru WADA r # .! Charge Area Identification Taluka Name C CA-01 Junnar 19°0'0"N ha CA-02 Ambegaon sk 19°0'0"N am an D CA-03 Khed a m CA-04 Mawal CA-05 Mulshi S PETH H 5 # CA-06 Velhe 4 i G d CA-07 Bhor h a T od Na o d w CA-08 Purandhar i( e w R CA-03 i n KADUS v CA-09 Haveli a e K a # r u r v ) k CA-10 Shirur d a d A s i G R CA-11 Daund N RAJGURUNAGAR i s H v e d a CA-12 Baramati /" r r v a M i w CA-13 Indapur M Wa o d i A v T u H 54 a le Dam S 62 18°50'0"N m SH D N SHIRUR 18°50'0"N b £H-5 ¤0 N a /" i CA-04 #DAVADI AG #KENDUR LEGEND KHADKALE
    [Show full text]
  • (2015), Volume 3, Issue 9, 1471- 1480
    ISSN 2320-5407 International Journal of Advanced Research (2015), Volume 3, Issue 9, 1471- 1480 Journal homepage: http://www.journalijar.com INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED RESEARCH RESEARCH ARTICLE Biodiversity, Ecological status and Conservation priority of the fishes of river Gomti, Lucknow (U.P., India) Archana Srivastava1 & Achintya Singhal2 1. Primary School , SION, Chiriya Gaun, Varanasi 2. Department of Computer Science, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi Manuscript Info Abstract Manuscript History: The studies of fish fauna of different water bodies were made by different workers. However, the study of ichthyofauna of the Gomti River at Lucknow Received: 15 July 2015 is scanty. This paper deals with the fish fauna of the Gomti river at Lucknow Final Accepted: 16 August 2015 o o Published Online: September 2015 (Latitude: 26 51N and Longitude: 80 58E). A systematic list of 70 species have been prepared containing two endangered, six vulnerable, twelve Key words: indeterminate and fifty not evaluated species, belonging to nine order, twenty one families and forty two genera respectively. Scientific names, Fish fauna, river Gomti, status, morphological character, fin-formula, local name, common name etc. of each biodiversity, conservation species was studied giving a generalized idea about finfishes of Lucknow. *Corresponding Author Copy Right, IJAR, 2015,. All rights reserved Archana Srivastava INTRODUCTION Biodiversity in relation to ecosystem function is one of the emerging areas of the research in environmental biology, and very little is known about it at national and international level. It is a contracted form of biological diversity encompassing the variety of all forms on the earth. It is identified as the variability among living organisms and the ecological complexes of which they are part including diversity between species and ecosystems.
    [Show full text]
  • Freshwater Fish Fauna of Andhra Pradesh with Comments on the Threatened and Endemic Species
    ZOOlWICAlOF INDIA SURVEY . .. IIU~_., ....'f~. " ~ -.,.. ' ~ Rec. ZOO!. Surv. India: l09(Part-l) : 41-47, 2009 FRESHWATER FISH FAUNA OF ANDHRA PRADESH WITH COMMENTS ON THE THREATENED AND ENDEMIC SPECIES R. P. BARMAN Zoological Survey of India, FPS Building, Kolkata-700 016 INTRODUCTION Andhra Pradesh is one of the eight maritme states of our country lying on the southeastern coast of the Indian Peninsula. Three major mountain ranges are located in the state. The Eastern Ghats which constitute a chain of hill ranges fringing the east coastal line, the Deccan plateau with the Sahyadri range of Adilabad district to the north border and the Horseley & other hills of the Chittoor and Anantapur districts to the south border of this state. Two major rivers of South India. viz., the Godavari and the Krishna River with their several tributaries form the chief perennial river systems of this state. There are a large number of medium and small sized rivers in addition to several Man made reservoirs in this state. Moreover, there are several wetlands including one of the National Wetlands, viz., Kolleru Lake in this state. The state is known to contain 158 species under 68 genera, 27 families and 10 orders of freshwater fishes (Barman, 1993). The freshwater fish fauna of this state has been reviewed in respect of the threatened and endemic freshwater fishes of our country. This has revealed that Andhra Pradesh contains 53 threatened freshwater fishes of India as per Molur & Walker (1998) and Menon (1999 and 2004). Out ofth 53 threatened species, Endangered, Vulnerable, Rare and near threatened species are represented by 15, 27, 5 and .6 species respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • 15. Fish Diversity of Triyuga River
    OurShrestha Nature / Our│December Nature (2016), 2016 │ 1414 (1):(1): 124-134 124-134 ISSN: 1991-2951 (Print) ISSN: 2091-2781 (Online) Our Nature Journal homepage: http://nepjol.info/index.php/ON Fish diversity of Triyuga River, Udayapur District, Nepal Jay Narayan Shrestha Department of Zoology, Post Graduate Campus, Biratnagar, Tribhuvan University, Nepal E-mail: [email protected] Abstract The present paper deals with a synopsis of 48 fish species under 35 genera belonging to 17 families and 6 orders from Triyuga River. Some interesting fish species reported from this river are Barilus shacra, Garra annandalei, Psilorhynchoides pseudecheneis, Badis badis, Olyra longicoudata, Tor putitora, Labeo dero and Anguilla bengalensis . Fish diversity of Triyuga river is rich, thus further extensive study is essential for their conservation. Key words : Barilus shacra , Fish, Fattehpur, Mahabharat hill DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3126/on.v14i1.16452 Manuscript details: Received: 28.08.2016 / Accepted: 25.11.2016 Citation: Shrestha, J.N. 2016. Fish diversity of Triyuga River, Udayapur District, Nepal . Our Nature 14(1) :124-134. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3126/on.v14i1.16452 Copyright: © Shrestha 2016. Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. Introduction Initially two small streams, in the form of Udayapur district (26 o39'-27 o22'N and drainage of the lake, take their form from 86 o9'-87 o10'E) is located in the eastern de- two separate spots of the lake and both of velopment region of Nepal. It is bounded them run down towards the south slope by nine districts,Dhankuta and Sunsari in then confluence and become the river Tri- the east, Saptari and Siraha in the south, yuga.
    [Show full text]
  • By Thesis Submitted for the Degree of Vidyavachaspati (Doctor of Philosophy) Faculty for Moral and Social Sciences Department Of
    “A STUDY OF AN ECOLOGICAL PATHOLOGICAL AND BIO-CHEMICAL IMPACT OF URBANISATION AND INDUSTRIALISATION ON WATER POLLUTION OF BHIMA RIVER AND ITS TRIBUTARIES PUNE DISTRICTS, MAHARASHTRA, INDIA” BY Dr. PRATAPRAO RAMGHANDRA DIGHAVKAR, I. P. S. THESIS SUBMITTED FOR THE DEGREE OF VIDYAVACHASPATI (DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY) FACULTY FOR MORAL AND SOCIAL SCIENCES DEPARTMENT OF SOCIOLOGY TILAK MAHARASHTRA VIDHYAPEETH PUNE JUNE 2016 CERTIFICATE This is to certify that the entire work embodied in this thesis entitled A STUDY OFECOLOGICAL PATHOLOGICAL AND BIOCHEMICAL IMPACT OF URBANISATION AND INDUSTRILISATION ON WATER POLLUTION OF BHIMA RIVER AND Its TRIBUTARIES .PUNE DISTRICT FOR A PERIOD 2013-2015 has been carried out by the candidate DR.PRATAPRAO RAMCHANDRA DIGHAVKAR. I. P. S. under my supervision/guidance in Tilak Maharashtra Vidyapeeth, Pune. Such materials as has been obtained by other sources and has been duly acknowledged in the thesis have not been submitted to any degree or diploma of any University or Institution previously. Date: / / 2016 Place: Pune. Dr.Prataprao Ramchatra Dighavkar, I.P.S. DECLARATION I hereby declare that this dissertation entitled A STUDY OF AN ECOLOGICAL PATHOLOGICAL AND BIO-CHEMICAL IMPACT OF URBANISNTION AND INDUSTRIALISATION ON WATER POLLUTION OF BHIMA RIVER AND Its TRIBUTARIES ,PUNE DISTRICT FOR A PERIOD 2013—2015 is written and submitted by me at the Tilak Maharashtra Vidyapeeth, Pune for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy The present research work is of original nature and the conclusions are base on the data collected by me. To the best of my knowledge this piece of work has not been submitted for the award of any degree or diploma in any University or Institution.
    [Show full text]
  • Government of Maharashtra State Common Entrance Test Cell, Maharashtara State
    Government of Maharashtra State Common Entrance Test Cell, Maharashtara State Vacant seats after last date of reporting of Final CAP Round II to be filled by Institute for Admission to First Year Under Graduate Technical Course in B.Pharmacy & Post Graduate Pharm.D for the Academic Year 2020-21 Published Date:30/01/2021 Autonomous Institute 3016 - Bombay College of Pharmacy, Santacruz(E), Mumbai Government-Aided Autonomous Vacant CAP Seats:15 Choice Code Course Name SI MS Minority Seats All India Institute Orphan Seats Seats 301682310 Pharmacy 60 15 0 0 0 0 Category OPEN SC ST VJ/DT NTB NTC NTD OBC Total General / Ladies G L G L G L G L G L G L G L G L G + L State Level 2 2 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 3 1 14 PWD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PWD Common Reserved Seats : 0 DEF 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 DEF Common Reserved Seats : 1 Economically Weaker Section (EWS) Seats: 0 TFWS Choice Code : 301682311T Seats: 0 3016 - Bombay College of Pharmacy, Santacruz(E), Mumbai Un-Aided Autonomous Vacant CAP Seats:12 Choice Code Course Name SI MS Minority Seats All India Institute Orphan Seats Seats 301682370U Pharmacy 40 11 0 1 0 0 Category OPEN SC ST VJ/DT NTB NTC NTD OBC Total General / Ladies G L G L G L G L G L G L G L G L G + L State Level 3 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 10 PWD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PWD Common Reserved Seats : 0 DEF 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 DEF Common Reserved Seats : 0 Economically Weaker Section (EWS) Seats: 0 TFWS Choice Code : 301682371UT Seats: 0 3036 - Institute of Chemical Technology, Matunga, Mumbai Government Autonomous Vacant CAP Seats:3 Choice Code Course Name SI MS Minority Seats All India Institute Orphan Seats Seats 303682310 Pharmacy 30 3 0 0 0 0 Category OPEN SC ST VJ/DT NTB NTC NTD OBC Total General / Ladies G L G L G L G L G L G L G L G L G + L F:Only For Female, T: Tuition FeeWaiver Scheme ,HU:Home University,OHU:Other than Home University ,PWD:Persons with Disabilities , DEF:Defence seats,Common Reserved:Combined Common for All Reserved Categories Note: -Vacancy position may vary.
    [Show full text]
  • Proposal for Use of Forest Land for Non-Forest Purpose
    PROPOSAL FOR USE OF FOREST LAND FOR NON-FOREST PURPOSE CONSTRUCTION OF APPROACH ROAD FOREST LAND REQUIRED 0.30 HA. AT-VILLAGE KOREGAONBHIMA TAL-SHIRUR DIST-PUNE COMPTT. No.303 S.No.151GUT No. 675 TALUKA-SHIRUR , DISTRICT-PUNE. No.FP/MH/Others/31657/2018 PROPOSAL SUBMITTED BY Asst.Manager, Poshs Metal Industries, Gut No.746, Sanaswadi, Tal-Shirur Dist- Pune-410 508 1 Reference: Index Sr. No.1 APPENDIX (See rule 6) FORM – A Form for seeking prior approval under section 2 of F.C.A.1980.Proposal by State Government and other Authorities (See Rule 6) PART – I (To be filled up by user agency) 1. Project Details I) Short narrative of the Purpose:- Proposal for Constructed approach proposal and project / road regulised for Gut No.745, 746, 898A, & 898B, scheme for which the forest land is required. to located factory premises. This area is declared industrial zone by town planning department. There are many small scale industries/ factories are going on and basic amenities are being developed in this industrial area, such as 1) Poshs Metal, 2) Praj Industries, 3) Wakratund Ispat & 4) Hirschvogel Components India Pvt. Ltd. In above industries there are average employing is 1500 to 2000 per day & their lilvelihood depend on this industrial work. The existing village road is near from our companies and it is 360 mtr away from factory premises. As the forest area Comptt.No.303 S.No.151 Gut No. 675 lies exactly in between the industrial zone and existing village road. East side of parallel boundary of Forest Comptt.No.303 S.No.151 Gut No.
    [Show full text]
  • Pmrda Village List
    List of Villages under Bhor S.No. Villages Wadi 1 Bhambavade 2 Bhongavli 3 Degaon 4 Dhangawadi 5 Didghar 6 Divale 7 Gunand 8 Hrishchandri 9 Jambhali 10 Kambare 11 Kamthadi 12 Kanjale 13 Kapurhol 14 Karandi 15 Kasurdi 16 Kelavade 17 Kenjal 18 Ketkavane (Nimme) 19 Khadki 20 Khopi 21 Kikavi 22 Kolavadi 23 Kurungvadi 24 Kusgaon 25 Malegaon 26 Morwadi 27 Nasrapur 28 Naygaon 29 Nhavi 30 Nidhan 31 Nigade 32 Pande 33 Panjalwadi 34 Parvadi 35 Rajapur 36 Ranje 37 Salavade 38 Sangavi Bk. 39 Sangavi Kh. 40 Sarole 41 Sasewadi 42 Savardare 43 Shindewadi 44 Shivare 45 Sonavadi 46 Taprewadi 47 Umbare 48 Varve Bk. List of Villages under Bhor S.No. Villages Wadi 49 Varve Kh. 50 Vathar Kh. 51 Velu 52 Virwadi 53 Wagajwadi List of Villages under Daund S.No. Villages Wadi 1 Amoni Mal 2 Bhandgaon 3 Bharatgoan 4 Boratewadi 5 Boriaindi 6 Boribhadak 7 Boripardhi 8 Dahitane 9 Dalimb 10 Dapodi Ekeriwadi 11 Delvadi 12 Deshmukh Mala 13 Devkarwadi 14 Dhaygudewadi 15 Dhumalicha Mala 16 Galandwadi 17 Ganesh Road 18 Handalwadi 19 Jawjebuwachiwadi 20 Kamatwadi 21 Kasurdi 22 Kedgaon 23 Kedgaon Station 24 Khamgaon 25 Khopodi 26 Khutbav 27 Koregaon Bhiwar 28 Ladkatwadi 29 Mirwadi 30 Nandur 31 Nangaon 32 Nathachiwadi 33 Nimbalkar Wasti 34 Panwali 35 Pargaon 36 Patethan 37 Pilanwadi 38 Pimpalgaon 39 Rahu 40 Sahajpurwadi 41 Takali 42 Tambewadi 43 Tamhanwadi 44 Telewadi 45 Undavadi 46 Vadgaon Bande 47 Valki 48 Varwand List of Villages under Daund S.No. Villages Wadi 49 Wakhari 50 Yawat 51 Yawat Station List of Villages under Haveli S.No.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Riverine Fisheries and Linking with Water Quality Restoration Programme - River Godavari in Maharshatra
    Final Report ASSESSMENT OF RIVERINE FISHERIES AND LINKING WITH WATER QUALITY RESTORATION PROGRAMME - RIVER GODAVARI IN MAHARSHATRA 2011 Maharashtra Pollution Control Board Central Institute of Fisheries Education Indian Council of Agricultural Research Versova, Mumbai - 400061 CONTENTS 1. BACKGROUND 2 2. OBJECTIVES 6 3. STUDY AREA 7 4. METHODOLOGY 11 4.1. Sampling Procedure 11 4.2. Identification of Fish 12 4.3. Physicochemical Parameter Analysis 12 4.4. Heavy Metal Analysis 12 4.5. Plankton Analysis 12 4.6. Periodicity and Frequency of Sampling 12 5. PHYSICOCHEMICAL PARAMETERS 13 5.1. Water and Sediment Quality 14 5.2. Discussion 19 6. FISH AND FISHERIES 23 6.1. Fishing Craft and Tackle 23 6.1.1. Craft 23 6.1.1.1. Raft 23 6.1.1.2. Motor vehicle tubes 23 6.1.1.3. Boat 23 6.1.2. Gear 23 6.1.2.1. Set gillnet 23 6.1.2.2. Large seine 23 6.1.2.3. Small seine 23 6.1.2.4. Cast net 24 6.2. Fishery Status 24 6.2.1. Fish diversity 24 6.2.2. Fish species 25 6.2.3. Salient identifying characters of finfishes of River 46 Godavari 6.3. Discussion 71 7. PLANKTON 78 7.1. Distribution 78 7.2. Discussion 78 8. HEAVY METALS 84 8.1. Water 84 8.2. Sediment 85 8.3. Fish 85 8.4. Discussion 86 9. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 106 9.1. Conclusions 106 9.2. Recommendations 107 10. REFERENCES 109 1 1. BACKGROUND From time immemorial, the rivers are said to be the lifeline for living beings, as all types of developments, directly or indirectly relate to them.
    [Show full text]
  • Pethia Gelius (Dwarf Barb) Ecological Risk Screening Summary
    Dwarf Barb (Pethia gelius) Ecological Risk Screening Summary U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, May 2011 Revised, July 2018 Web Version, 8/7/2019 Photo: F. M. Greco. Licensed under CC BY 3.0. Available: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Pethia_gelius.jpg. (July 2018). 1 Native Range and Status in the United States Native Range From Dahanukar (2015): “Pethia gelius has a wide distribution in India (Madhya Pradesh, Uttar Pradesh, Orissa, West Bengal, Assam, Bihar) and Bangladesh (Jayaram 1991, Menon 1999).” Status in the United States Nico and Neilson (2018) report Pethia gelius from Florida (Southeast Coast and South Atlantic- Gulf Region). The earliest observation occurred in 1974 and the last observation occurred in 1984. From Nico and Neilson (2018): “Failed in Florida.” This species is in trade in the United States. For example, from Bluegrass Aquatics (2018): “$4.62 […] DWARF GOLDEN BARB::: Barbus gelius […]” 1 Means of Introductions in the United States From Nico and Neilson (2018): “Probable escape from fish farm.” Remarks From Nico and Neilson (2018): “[…] Pethiyagoda et al. (2012) reassigned this species from Puntius to Pethia, […]” The name Puntius gelius still commonly appears in scientific literature and as a trade name, so it was also used when researching in preparation of this report. 2 Biology and Ecology Taxonomic Hierarchy and Taxonomic Standing From ITIS (2018): “Kingdom Animalia Subkingdom Bilateria Infrakingdom Deuterostomia Phylum Chordata Subphylum Vertebrata Infraphylum Gnathostomata Superclass Actinopterygii Class Teleostei Superorder Ostariophysi Order Cypriniformes Superfamily Cyprinoidea Family Cyprinidae Genus Puntius Species Puntius gelius (Hamilton, 1822)” From Eschmeyer et al. (2018): “Current status: Valid as Pethia gelius (Hamilton 1822).
    [Show full text]