The Corpse in the Early Bronze Age. Results of Histotaphonomic And

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Corpse in the Early Bronze Age. Results of Histotaphonomic And Archaeologia Austriaca, Band 102/2018, 135–167 © 2018 by Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften, Wien 135 doi: 10.1553/archaeologia102s135 The Corpse in the Early Bronze Age. Results of Histotaphonomic and Archaeothanatological Investigations of Human Remains from the Cemetery of Franzhausen I, Lower Austria Kirsten Mandl Friederike Novotny Maria Teschler-Nicola Estella Weiss-Krejci Abstract Zusammenfassung – Leichenbehandlung in der Frühbronze­ It has recently been suggested by British archaeologists and anthro- zeit. Resultate histotaphonomischer und archäothanatologischer pologists that mummification may have been widespread in Bronze Untersuchungen von menschlichen Überresten aus dem Gräberfeld Age Europe. This article presents the results of a study that, for the von Franzhausen I, Niederösterreich first time, investigates the question of whether the people who inhab- Jüngsten Theorien zufolge war Mumifizierung in der Bronzezeit ited central Europe during the Early Bronze Age treated the bodies in Europa weit verbreitet. Dieser Beitrag beschäftigt sich erstmals of their dead prior to deposition in order to prevent decay and pre- mit der Frage, ob die frühbronzezeitlichen Bewohner Zentraleuro- serve the soft tissue. The study relies on data from the cemetery of pas ihren Toten eine dem Erhalt des Weichteilgewebes förderliche Franzhausen I in Lower Austria. The cemetery, excavated between Behandlung zukommen ließen. Die Daten stammen vom zwischen 1981 and 1983, contained 714 Early Bronze Age graves and two pits 1981 und 1983 ausgegrabenen Gräberfeld von Franzhausen I, das with human remains. A sample of 22 skeletons from 22 graves was 714 frühbronzezeitliche Gräber und zwei Gruben mit menschlichen investigated using macroscopic, post-hoc archaeothanatological, and Skelettresten umfasst. Eine Stichprobe von 22 Skeletten aus 22 Grä- histotaphonomic analyses. Thin sections of the femora of 18 out of bern wurde makroskopischen, post-hoc archäothanatologischen und 22 individuals show high degrees of microbial tunnelling resulting histotaphonomischen Analysen unterzogen. Femur-Dünnschliffe from extensive putrefaction processes. Thin sections of femora from von 18 der 22 Individuen zeigen einen hohen Grad an mikrobiellem four individuals show less bioerosion indicating that the microbial Befall, der von Verwesungsprozessen herrührt. Femur-Dünnschliffe invasion accompanying autolysis and decomposition was arrested at von vier Individuen weisen geringere Bioerosion auf, was darauf hin- an early stage of the taphonomic process. Since the femora of these weist, dass Autolyse und Fäulnis begleitende mikrobielle Invasoren four individuals are partially discoloured green we lean towards the in einem frühen taphonomischen Stadium gestoppt wurden. Da die assumption that the good preservation of the internal bone micro- Femora dieser vier Individuen teilweise grün verfärbt sind, lässt sich structure was caused by a post-depositional uptake of heavy metals die gute Erhaltung der inneren Knochenmikrostruktur mit der post- eroding from copper and bronze grave goods, mediated by a coffin depositionalen Aufnahme von Schwermetallen aus kupfernen und environment. bronzenen Grabbeigaben in einem Sargmilieu erklären. Keywords Schlüsselbegriffe Funerary customs, mortuary archaeology, mummification, corpse Bestattungssitten, Gräberarchäologie, Mumifizierung, Leichenbe- preparation, archaeothanatology, bone diagenesis, histotaphonomy, handlung, Archäothanatologie, Knochendiagenese, Histotaphono- Early Bronze Age, Lower Austria, Franzhausen I. mie, Frühbronzezeit, Niederösterreich, Franzhausen I. 136 Kirsten Mandl et al. 1. Introduction record these forms of preparation can only be recognised Processes of decomposition that take place in a dead body under favourable conditions and through careful docu- cannot be ignored by any society. A corpse does not qui- mentation and sampling during excavation. Treatments etly disappear. When rigor mortis ends, micro-organisms such as burning are easily recognised because they contrib- become highly active and the corpse begins to rot. The ute to disarticulation and fragmentation and leave visible transformation is accompanied by bloating, the emanation structural changes in the bones. Some forms of treatment of methane and a sulphurous smell, discolouration and the such as active excarnation, dehydration, and chemical and gradual detachment of the upper skin layer.1 In some in- thermal modification,9 may not be as apparent, especially stances the body may even produce a noise.2 All of these when there is no disarticulation of the bones10 and only the processes set the human senses on alert. Unless abandon- soft tissue has been affected. Depending on the method, cut ment is an option,3 the biological reality of the dead body marks on the bones may be an indicator of either defleshing and its predisposition to decay means that it is imperative or of evisceration, especially when the thoracic viscera are for survivors to do something about it.4 In today’s Europe, also removed. In the latter case one would expect cuts on the usual response is to remove the corpse from the place either the ventral side of the lower thoracic vertebrae or on of death as soon as possible, to cool it and to store it in a the sternum and the ribs. However, it should be emphasised morgue until its burial in the ground or cremation. In the that evisceration is not a prerequisite for mummification.11 prehistoric past, responses were probably much more var- Enhanced dehydration can also be accomplished using the iable, although exactly how variable is not always easy to heat emanating from a fire and by draining the body fluids determine. Today we are probably only looking at a small with a cloth or some other absorbent substance.12 section of a much larger prehistoric population that, due to Prehistoric mummified corpses that, over the course various taphonomic processes, has not been preserved in the of centuries or millennia have been transformed into skel- archaeological record.5 etons, can easily be mistaken for ‘primary burials’.13 This ‘mummy problem’14 can have serious implications for ar- 1.1. Treatment of the Corpse chaeological interpretation. If articulated, mummified, and A society’s response to the rotting corpse and the employ- macerated corpses are moved around15 but their treatment, ment of distinctive post-mortem corpse treatments can pro- manipulation, and re-deposition go unnoticed, the assump- vide a window into ancient attitudes towards death and the tions about the form of the original burial, the chronological afterlife, offer an understanding of the relationship between relationship with associated artefacts, the level of people’s body and ‘soul’6 and unmask group identities and social dis- engagement with the corpse, the identity of the deceased, tinctions.7 The minimum preparation8 afforded to a deceased per- 9 Aufderheide 2003. son who died under regular circumstances usually consists 10 According to recent taphonomic studies, Neolithic bodies from Ҫ of washing, shrouding, or dressing. In the archaeological atalhöyük had probably been excarnated through partial consump- tion by vultures. Within the first days or weeks after death they still retained their ligaments and were deposited in a fully articulated state. 1 Iserson 1994, 42–43. – Hochmeister, Grassberger, Stimpfl – Pilloud et al. 2016. 2007, 19. – Reiter, Ilbeygui, Stein 2007, 16–17. 11 We apply the term ‘mummification’ to all corpse treatments that 2 It is no coincidence that in the past decaying corpses were instinc- result in soft-tissue preservation, be it via natural processes (as for tively feared in societies that practiced inhumation. Barber 1987 example with Ötzi the Iceman) or by artificial means (Rameses II, argues that the belief in revenants arose out of misconceptions con- Lenin, Evita Perón, etc.). However, we would like to emphasise that cerning the nature of decomposition. we only maintain this loaded term, which immediately brings to mind 3 In the past, abandonment of the corpse was a frequent response to Egyptian or South American mummies, in the absence of an accept- death among hunter-gatherer populations: e.g. Fourie 1928, 95. able alternative. 4 Nilsson Stutz 2008. 12 See Beckett et al. 2017 on mummification without evisceration 5 Parker Pearson 1999, 5. – Weiss-Krejci 2011a, 68. – Booth, among the Ibaloy of North Luzon, Philippines. Madgwick 2016, 14. 13 A primary burial is defined as an untreated corpse, deposited in 6 We would like to stress that the term ‘soul’ is probably inadequate the flesh shortly after death and not disturbed at any later point in as a description of prehistoric conceptions of the spiritual essence of time. – See also Pilloud et al. 2016, 3. a person. 14 Weiss-Krejci 2011a, 78. – Weiss-Krejci 2011b, 166. 7 Binford 1971. – Carr 1995. – Scherer 2015. 15 Desiccated articulated royal corpses of the Inca were regularly 8 We follow terminology by Binford 1971, 21 and Carr 1995, 130 brought into the public domain in order to attend state ceremonies who differentiate body preparation (e.g. washing) from body treat- and answer important questions. – Brundage 1963, 179. – McEwan ment (mummification, cremation, mutilation, etc.).Sprague 2005, 70 2006, 140. – Weiss-Krejci 2013. – For further examples see Aufder- calls them all ‘body treatments’. heide 2003. The Corpse in the Early Bronze Age 137 and even the archaeological age of the dead body may be mound near the Heuneburg, Germany. Here the presence misinterpreted.
Recommended publications
  • Durham Research Online
    Durham Research Online Deposited in DRO: 18 October 2018 Version of attached le: Published Version Peer-review status of attached le: Peer-reviewed Citation for published item: Caswell, E. and Roberts, B.W. (2018) 'Reassessing community cemeteries : cremation burials in Britain during the Middle Bronze Age (c. 16001150 cal BC).', Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society., 84 . pp. 329-357. Further information on publisher's website: https://doi.org/10.1017/ppr.2018.9 Publisher's copyright statement: c The Prehistoric Society 2018. This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in DRO • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full DRO policy for further details. Durham University Library, Stockton Road, Durham DH1 3LY, United Kingdom Tel : +44 (0)191 334 3042 | Fax : +44 (0)191 334 2971 https://dro.dur.ac.uk Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society, page 1 of 29 © The Prehistoric Society. This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
    [Show full text]
  • Theory Discussion
    02 Theory discussion 16 2.1 Introduction Corpse Disposal Methods This thesis aims to design a burial site, which practices sustainable corpse disposal, prevents placelessness through locally grounding, and focuses on the experience of the living user. This theory chapter is divided into two sections: 1. Sustainable corpse disposal 2. Placelessness and user experience In the first section current corpse disposal methods as well as the influence of culture on selecting how to dispose of a loved one’s corpse is discussed. Following this, sustainable and appropriate corpse disposal methods for this thesis is selected and explained. Section two is a theoretical discussion on the loss of identity and increased placelessness of cemeteries, as well as how the experience of the user can be made meaningful through a narrated landscape. Section 1: Sustainable corpse disposal 2.2 Unsustainable burial practice Figure 7. Current corpse disposal methods (Author 2015). Johannesburg’s Cemeteries are quickly filling up and the city is rapidly running out of burial space (SAPA 2010). This calls for a change in the long established conventional burial, is the placing of a corpse underground in a casket or coffin custom of traditional burial. A less land intensive and more sustainable corpse (Leuta & Green 2011). The grave is traditionally marked with a tombstone to disposal method is required. Cremation and traditional burial are the only legal commemorate the deceased. body disposal methods in South Africa, however many other methods are used internationally; Figure 7 illustrates some of these methods. The coffin is lowered two meter into the soil and covered with the backfill soil.
    [Show full text]
  • Bronze Age Iron Age Anglo-Saxons the Mayflower Thames Tunnel The
    Monday 11th – Friday 15th May 2020 History Think about what the word ancient means. Which description below do you think is the most accurate? 1. Ancient means a period of time five years ago. 2. Ancient means a period of time five hundred years ago. 3. Ancient means a period of time five thousand years ago. This half term, we will be looking at a time in history when people lived many thousands of years ago. People who lived many thousands of years ago lived in what we call ancient times. There were three main time periods (long lengths of time) in ancient times in Britain (the country we live in). We call these periods of time the Stone Age, the Bronze Age and the Iron Age. Bronze and iron are types of metal. Why do you think these periods of time were named after metals? Look at the pictures below. Can you match the ancient artefact (object) to the right time period? What clues can you see? We will be looking in more detail at the Bronze Age and Iron Age – they both happened after the Stone Age. The Bronze Age began around 2,100BCE (over 4,000 years ago). It lasted for around 1500 years until 750BCE when the Iron Age began. Bronze Age Anglo-Saxons Thames Tunnel 2,100BCE 750BCE 55BCE 0 410 1620 1825 1940 2020 Iron Age The Mayflower The Blitz Just like the Stone Age when early humans made tools from stone, the Bronze Age was called that because humans started making tools from…bronze! The Bronze Age started at different times around the world – depending on when humans in different countries discovered how to make bronze by mixing other metals together.
    [Show full text]
  • Neolithic Report
    RESEARCH DEPARTMENT REPORT SERIES no. 29-2011 ISSN 1749-8775 REVIEW OF ANIMAL REMAINS FROM THE NEOLITHIC AND EARLY BRONZE AGE OF SOUTHERN BRITAIN (4000 BC – 1500 BC) ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES REPORT Dale Serjeantson ARCHAEOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Department Report Series 29-2011 REVIEW OF ANIMAL REMAINS FROM THE NEOLITHIC AND EARLY BRONZE AGE OF SOUTHERN BRITAIN (4000 BC – 1500 BC) Dale Serjeantson © English Heritage ISSN 1749-8775 The Research Department Report Series, incorporates reports from all the specialist teams within the English Heritage Research Department: Archaeological Science; Archaeological Archives; Historic Interiors Research and Conservation; Archaeological Projects; Aerial Survey and Investigation; Archaeological Survey and Investigation; Architectural Investigation; Imaging, Graphics and Survey; and the Survey of London. It replaces the former Centre for Archaeology Reports Series, the Archaeological Investigation Report Series, and the Architectural Investigation Report Series. Many of these are interim reports which make available the results of specialist investigations in advance of full publication. They are not usually subject to external refereeing, and their conclusions may sometimes have to be modified in the light of information not available at the time of the investigation. Where no final project report is available, readers are advised to consult the author before citing these reports in any publication. Opinions expressed in Research Department Reports are those of the author(s) and are not necessarily those of English Heritage. Requests for further hard copies, after the initial print run, can be made by emailing: [email protected]. or by writing to English Heritage, Fort Cumberland, Fort Cumberland Road, Eastney, Portsmouth PO4 9LD Please note that a charge will be made to cover printing and postage.
    [Show full text]
  • Bronze Age Warfare in Barbaric Europe - Current Trends and Perspectives in the Future
    Perspective Glob J Arch & Anthropol Volume 4 Issue 1 - May 2018 DOI: 10.19080/GJAA.2018.04.555628 Copyright © All rights are reserved by Davide Delfino Bronze Age Warfare in Barbaric Europe - Current Trends and Perspectives in the Future Davide Delfino* Center for Geosciences of the University of Coimbra, Instituto Terra e Memória, Portugal Submission: February 02, 2018; Published: May 11, 2018 *Corresponding author: Davide Delfino, Center for Geosciences of the University of Coimbra, Instituto Terra e Memória, Portugal, Email: Abstract Research on prehistoric warfare is in progress since 60 years. But investigation specifically on Bronze Age period, when some tools are exclusively created for fight and the warrior societies are emerging, is always young. Scholars there were mainly interested on the origins of violence in mankind, on the fighting in the Neolithic or, if Bronze Age, on the wars in the empires of the Near East or in the Minoan civilization. But the warfare in the European Bronze Age up to a decade ago, it was dealt marginally. Violence and warfare in Bronze Age in “barbarian Europe”, to use an expression by Jaques Briard, can be defined as a “fashion” since the mid-2000s. Recent trends are analyzed according to various perspectives: generals, theoretical, study of material cultures and context, and interpretative tendencies. So will be discuss what the commonly acceptedKeywords: theories and what also remain subject of doubt and debate to draw a perspective for the future. European Bronze Age; Warfare; Literature review;
    [Show full text]
  • Session 1. Archaeology Is a Political Matter
    SESSION 1. ARCHAEOLOGY IS A POLITICAL MATTER (Wednesday, 21st Dec., Lecture Theatre C) Rob Lennox, Council for British Archaeology, Chartered Institute of Archaeologists, University of York, and Lorna-Jane Richardson Umeå University, Council for British Archaeology 09:00 – 09:10 Introduction 09:10 – 09:30 The politics of Brexit. Why archaeologists need to be concerned, Kevin Wooldridge, Freelance archaeologist 09:30 – 09:50 Quitting my archaeological job as a political deed, Marjolijn Kok, Bureau Archeologie en Toekomst, Netherlands 09:50 – 10:10 Commercial archaeology and narratives of British exceptionalism, Florence Smith Nicholls, Compass Archaeology 10:10 – 10:30 Selling a political framework for the Public Value Era, Rob Lennox, University of York 10:30 – 10:50 Breaking ground, fighting back; Unite Digging for a Living Wage, Matthew Seaver, Unite Archaeological Branch, Ireland 10:50 – 11:10 Coffee Break 11:10 – 11:30 Time to bite the hand that feeds? Or, at the very least, give it a long, hard squeeze, David Jennings, University of York 11:30 – 11:50 "Another Brick in the Wall" - Archaeological Outreach in Schools as a Political Act, Penelope Foreman, Bournemouth University 11:50 – 12:10 DNA and Soil: Archaeology, Palaeogenetics and Nationalism, Tom Booth, Natural History Museum, London 12:10 – 12:30 Where history meets legend… and produces political sparks; presenting Tintagel Castle, Cornwall, Susan Greaney, Cardiff University/ English Heritage 12:30 – 12:50 Turf Wars: Politics and Peatland Archaeology in Ireland, Ben Gearey,
    [Show full text]
  • Patterns in the Modification of Animal and Human Bones in Iron Age Wessex: Revisiting the Excarnation Debate
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Online Research @ Cardiff Chapter 8 Patterns in the modification of animal and human bones in Iron Age Wessex: revisiting the excarnation debate Richard Madgwick Abstract Social practices concerning the treatment of human and animal remains in the Iron Age have long been a focus of debate in archaeological literature. The absence of evidence of a formal burial rite and the regular retrieval of human remains from ‘special’ deposits or ABG’s has led to widespread discussion surrounding what majority rite was practised in Iron Age Wessex and excarnation has been a popular explanation. The deposition of unusual configurations of faunal remains, often associated with human remains may be suggestive of an interrelated pre-depositional and depositional practise between the different classes of remains. This paper explores how a holistic analysis of bone taphonomy can contribute to the understanding of social practises surrounding the pre-depositional treatment of humans and animals. In a case study of the sites of Winnall Down and Danebury, it was demonstrated that humans and animals were treated significantly differently. Human remains exhibited far less modification than faunal material, suggesting that excarnation was unlikely to have been the majority rite. However, results indicate that either exposure in a protective environment or exhumation was practised so that partial or total disarticulation could occur with little taphonomic modification. Taphonomic analysis of faunal material demonstrates that it is not only humans and animals that were treated differently, as dog and horse remains exhibit significantly different patterns of modification to other animals.
    [Show full text]
  • Boom and Bust in Bronze Age Britain: Major Copper Production from the Great Orme Mine and European Trade, C
    Boom and bust in Bronze Age Britain: major copper production from the Great Orme mine and European trade, c. 1600–1400 BC R. Alan Williams1,* & Cécile Le Carlier de Veslud2 The Great Orme Bronze Age copper mine in Wales is one of Europe’s largest, although its size has been attributed to a small-scale, sea- sonal labour force working for nearly a millen- nium. Here, the authors report the results of interdisciplinary research that provides evi- dence that Great Orme was the focus of Brit- ain’s first mining boom, c. 1600–1400 BC, probably involving a full-time mining com- munity and the wide distribution of metal- work from Brittany to Sweden. This new interpretation suggests greater integration than previously suspected of Great Orme metal into the European Bronze Age trade/ exchange networks, as well as more complex local and regional socio-economic interactions. Keywords: Wales, Bronze Age, copper mining, ores, lead isotopes, archaeometallurgy, trade/ exchange Introduction Over the last few decades, an increasing number of prehistoric copper mines have been dis- covered around the world (O’Brien 2015; Ben-Yosef 2018). Archaeologists studying these complex and difficult-to-excavate sites face major challenges, especially when seeking to link mine ores to metalwork, establishing the scale of production and tracing associated trade/exchange networks. To achieve these aims requires the development of a methodology 1 Department of Archaeology, Classics and Egyptology, University of Liverpool, 12–14 Abercromby Square, Liverpool L69 7XZ, UK
    [Show full text]
  • Bronze Age Review
    A Bronze Age Review The international journal of research into the archaeology of the British and European Bronze Age Volume 1, November 2008 SHERIDAN BRONZE AGE REVIEW VOL. 1, NOVEMBER 2008 Creating a research agenda for the Bronze Age in Britain For the first volume of the Bronze Age Review, the editor invited senior scholars to draw on their experience and expertise and write on what they would like to see happening in Bronze Age research in Britain in the future. They were asked to look as broadly as they can and explore issues and areas of study that they feel are currently missing or underdeveloped. The aim is to provide a period of open consultation until 31 January 2009 with suggestions, comments and proposed new chapters to the editor who can be contacted at [email protected]. The authors will subsequently revise their articles for inclusion in a volume published by the British Museum Press. Contents 1-6 A canon for the Bronze Age? Anna Brindley 7-22 The Bronze Age climate and environment of Britain Tony Brown 23-33 Prospects and potential in the archaeology of Bronze Joanna Brück Age Britain 34-47 The agenda gap? Approaches to the Bronze Age in Jonathan Last current research frameworks 48-56 Information, interaction and society Ben Roberts 57-78 Towards a fuller, more nuanced narrative of Alison Sheridan Chalcolithic and Early Bronze Age Britain 2500–1500 BC 79-96 Bronze Age pottery and settlements in southern Ann Woodward England SHERIDAN BRONZE AGE REVIEW VOL. 1, NOVEMBER 2008 Towards a fuller, more nuanced narrative of Chalcolithic and Early Bronze Age Britain 2500–1500 BC Alison Sheridan (National Museums Scotland) Abstract This contribution considers some of the many recent advances in our understanding of Chalcolithic and Bronze Age Britain and uses these to highlight the weak points in our current state of knowledge.
    [Show full text]
  • Changing Times: the Emergence of a Bronze Age on the Isle of Man
    Changing times: the emergence of a Bronze Age on the Isle of Man. Rachel Joanne Crellin Doctor of Philosophy School of History, Classics and Archaeology Newcastle University February 2014 i Abstract In this thesis I consider the study of change. I present a critique of existing approaches to the study of change and time in a prehistoric context. I develop an approach that moves beyond explanations of change where change is the result of singular causation located in a single moment of time. I critically consider how change is understood in the work of key relational thinkers such as Latour, Bennett, Ingold and DeLanda, developing an understanding of change which stresses the interplay between continuously fluxing assemblages and episodes of dramatic change (phase transitions). The theoretical position established is applied to interpreting change during the Ronaldsway Late Neolithic and Early Bronze Age on the Isle of Man in an evidence-led analysis of material culture, mortuary practices and transformation of place. I focus on axes of stone and bronze and use them as a means to explore the effects of changing technology. New use-wear analysis on the Early Bronze Age corpus of metalwork from the Isle of Man is presented as a means of exploring the impact of bronze as a new material. I consider burial practices from 3000-1500 cal BC supported by twelve new radiocarbon dates. I also address changing relations with earth, drawing together diverse evidence including Earthfast Jar practices, the construction of burial monuments and the settlement evidence from the period. A new narrative for the period emerges highlighting the strength of an approach that draws on relational thinking.
    [Show full text]
  • Bronze Age Weight Systems As a Measure of Market Integration in Western Eurasia
    Bronze Age weight systems as a measure of market integration in Western Eurasia Nicola Ialongoa,1, Raphael Hermanna, and Lorenz Rahmstorfa aSeminar für Ur- und Frühgeschichte, Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, D-37073 Göttingen, Germany Edited by Kristian Kristiansen, Goteborgs Universitet, Gothenburg, Sweden, and accepted by Editorial Board Member Elsa M. Redmond May 20, 2021 (received for review March 26, 2021) Weighing technology was invented around 3000 BCE between The very phrasing of the reform implies that the king did not Mesopotamia and Egypt and became widely adopted in Western even introduce a new unit but simply ratified as official a value Eurasia within ∼2,000 y. For the first time in history, merchants that was already widely used (14). Furthermore, the diffusion of could rely on an objective frame of reference to quantify economic weighing technology in prestate societies in Europe and Anatolia value. The subsequent emergence of different weight systems goes indicates that the existence of a state was not even a requirement. hand in hand with the formation of a continental market. However, Once weighing technology became widespread, strong public we still do not know how the technological transmission happened institutions—where they existed—would have probably played a and why different weight systems emerged along the way. Here, we role in regulating weight systems. In Mesopotamia, for example, show that the diffusion of weighing technology can be explained as the existence of public institutions with outstanding economic ca- the result of merchants’ interaction and the emergence of primary pacity and a great need for imported goods played a substantial weight systems as the outcome of the random propagation of error role in creating opportunities for trade.
    [Show full text]
  • Prehistoric Britain
    Prehistoric Britain Plated disc brooch Kent, England Late 6th or early 7th century AD Bronze boars from the Hounslow Hoard 1st century BC-1st century AD Hounslow, Middlesex, England Visit resource for teachers Key Stage 2 Prehistoric Britain Contents Before your visit Background information Resources Gallery information Preliminary activities During your visit Gallery activities: introduction for teachers Gallery activities: briefings for adult helpers Gallery activity: Neolithic mystery objects Gallery activity: Looking good in the Neolithic Gallery activity: Neolithic farmers Gallery activity: Bronze Age pot Gallery activity: Iron Age design Gallery activity: An Iron Age hoard After your visit Follow-up activities Prehistoric Britain Before your visit Prehistoric Britain Before your visit Background information Prehistoric Britain Archaeologists and historians use the term ‘Prehistory’ to refer to a time in a people’s history before they used a written language. In Britain the term Prehistory refers to the period before Britain became part of the Roman empire in AD 43. The prehistoric period in Britain lasted for hundreds of thousands of years and this long period of time is usually divided into: Palaeolithic, Mesolithic, Neolithic (sometimes these three periods are combined and called the Stone Age), Bronze Age and Iron Age. Each of these periods might also be sub-divided into early, middle and late. The Palaeolithic is often divided into lower, middle and upper. Early Britain British Isles: Humans probably first arrived in Britain around 800,000 BC. These early inhabitants had to cope with extreme environmental changes and they left Britain at least seven times when conditions became too bad.
    [Show full text]