DOCSLIB.ORG

Local Residents H-Q Submissions to the Lincolnshire County Council Electoral Review

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Local Residents H-Q Submissions to the Lincolnshire County Council Electoral Review Local Residents H-Q submissions to the Lincolnshire County Council electoral review This PDF document contains submissions from local residents with surnames H-Q. Some versions of Adobe allow the viewer to move quickly between bookmarks. Local Boundary Commission for England Consultation Portal Page 1 of 1 Lincolnshire County Personal Details: Name: Ashleigh Hadlow E-mail: Postcode: Organisation Name: Comment text: I am against the splitting of the Cranwell wards. Cranwell and RAF Cranwell are on community and so do not require two separate councillors. As a resident of the RAF Cranwell end of the ward it seriously concerns me that there would even be the consideration of splitting the wards.I feel that having a separate councillor to that of cranwell village is not in my best interests in the long run. Uploaded Documents: None Uploaded https://consultation.lgbce.org.uk/node/print/informed-representation/7060 28/01/2016 Mayers, Mishka From: Mrs Jane E Hansford Sent: 27 January 2016 15:31 To: reviews Subject: Proposed division of Cranwell into two separate constituencies Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Completed I wish to register my objection to this proposal. Anyone who knows Cranwell would know that as a village with not much more than 1,000 dwellings (and this includes MOD properties) the proposal cannot be justified. Jane Hansford 1 Local Boundary Commission for England Consultation Portal Page 1 of 1 Lincolnshire County Personal Details: Name: P Hart E-mail: Postcode: Organisation Name: Comment text: It makes no sense for the village to be split, with a third of it coming under another town's duristriction. The representatives of Bourne will have no relevance to the people of Deeping compared to a representative from their own village. The Deeping people in the new catchment will not be represented at all and the representative will not have any impact on those people because their focus will rightly be on being of service to the people of Bourne. It would be for sensible to group all the Deepings under one representative, rather than pedantically counting heads to make it even. Uploaded Documents: None Uploaded https://consultation.lgbce.org.uk/node/print/informed-representation/7322 09/02/2016 Local Boundary Commission for England Consultation Portal Page 1 of 1 Lincolnshire County Personal Details: Name: Martin Hay E-mail: Postcode: Organisation Name: Comment text: Please do not divide a village the size of Welton. Many issues requiring local government decision affect the whole village and its infrastructure, so it must be treated as one unit in one authority. The proposed dividing line is quite unacceptable and impractical. I have had experience in Cambridgeshire over 11 years in local government and saw a number of examples in larger villages where councillors. council officers and members of the public were confused by what was effectively dual representation. I also had experience of seeing a parish boundary moved for good, modern logical reasons and it was onerous on officers and councillors time to eventually achieve.. This makes me suggest that it is extremely important now to get the boundary dividing lines right now and the new proposals are quite unsuitable to deliver efficient local government services.. Uploaded Documents: None Uploaded https://consultation.lgbce.org.uk/node/print/informed-representation/7240 03/02/2016 Local Boundary Commission for England Consultation Portal Page 1 of 1 Lincolnshire County Personal Details: Name: James Hogg E-mail: Postcode: Organisation Name: Comment text: This proposal deprives Dunholme of any voice (as well as Welton) and takes no account of the development in housing already approved for both villages. An arbitrary division of the sort proposed takes no account of realities on the ground, local needs for representation and the overwhelming need for proper local representation.It provides a lesser voice to Dunholme just when it is expanding in tandem with Welton and both need more say in future. Lumping these townships in with others deprives both built and rural areas of proper representation Councillors should stand for well established areas on the ground, not to suit some arbitrary number. Uploaded Documents: None Uploaded https://consultation.lgbce.org.uk/node/print/informed-representation/7446 09/02/2016 Local Boundary Commission for England Consultation Portal Page 1 of 1 Lincolnshire County Personal Details: Name: Marie Holmes E-mail: Postcode: Organisation Name: Na Comment text: Hi we do not agree that the boundary should be separated. Splitting will not only break the small community up, I believe that this will just create confusion and probably add cost.... It really is a ridiculous idea..... Why is the question ...... Uploaded Documents: None Uploaded https://consultation.lgbce.org.uk/node/print/informed-representation/7131 03/02/2016 Mayers, Mishka From: Percy Hunt Sent: 26 January 2016 14:45 To: reviews Cc: Peter Williams Subject: Parish of Boothby Pagnell > Proposed local boundary changes Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged Dear Sir, As a result of the proposals Boothby Pagnell would move from Glenside to Colsterworth Rural. I propose that it stays within Glenside or the proposed Upper Glens ward. Currently Boothby is one of seven parishes within North Beltisloe benefice and therefore works with the other parishes of Braceby, Ingoldsby, Lenton, Old Somerby (which includes the Humby villages), Ropsley and Sapperton. All these parishes would be in the proposed Upper Glens ward. Additionally Boothby is one of the parishes covered by The Legend a bi‐monthly community magazine that is distributed to Ingoldsby, Lenton with Hanby, Kelsby and Osgodby. All these parishes would be in the proposed Upper Glens ward. As the rural communities and the links between them grow ever more fragile I think it important that Boothby Pagnell remains in a ward where it has some links rather than into a ward where it has no links. I do not have the time or resources to do the full “balancing” argument that is suggested but suspect that the transfer of ~150 souls would be within the sensitivities of the draft proposal. Many thanks, Percy __________________________________ R m m This email has been sent from a virus-free computer protected by Avast. www.avast.com 1 Mayers, Mishka From: Clive Ingall Sent: 07 February 2016 16:58 To: reviews Subject: local Government Boundry Commision (LGBC)draft recommendations Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Completed Sent from my iPad Lincolnshire County Council Review. I think it is absolutely wrong that the village of Heighington should be be split in to two wards And having two separate electoral divisions heighington should be kept as one ward Heighington should be in with the ward with our neighbours Branston without doubt Two separate wards will be detrimental to the running of our local council Whoever thought this plan up has no idea regarding the the local layout of the area signed. Clive Ingall Muriel Ingall 9 Daniel Crescent 1 Mayers, Mishka From: Alex Ireland Sent: 29 January 2016 13:17 To: reviews Subject: Boundary commission splitting Cranwell Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Completed I am writing to object to the splitting of East and west cranwell into two separate electoral constituencies. We are one community and the permanent residents of Cranwell that are living close to the military houses need the continuity of being fully linked to Cranwell Village. Many attend St Andrews Church, the village social club and are active members of the community. It is madness to consider splitting our village. Yours faithfully, Alexander Ireland Sent from my iPad Sent from Outlook 1 Mayers, Mishka From: Rebecca Ireland Sent: 29 January 2016 13:14 To: reviews Subject: Boundary commission splitting Cranwell Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Completed I am writing to object to the splitting of East and west cranwell into two separate electoral constituencies. We are one community and the permanent residents of Cranwell that are living close to the military houses need the continuity of being fully linked to Cranwell Village. Many attend St Andrews Church, the village social club and are active members of the community. It is madness to consider splitting our village. Yours faithfully, Rebecca Ireland Sent from my iPad 1 Mayers, Mishka From: Tracy LE Sent: 15 January 2016 12:51 To: reviews Subject: electorial changes to LCC Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged I am slightly concerned with the boundary changes regarding Sibsey and Stickney. At present they are covered by the Boston and Skegness MP , Matt Warman. They are also grouped together as the Distract seat. The new LCC county councillor boundary change would mean that the area would be covered by the Coningsby area county councillor. I would think that as most people shop in Boston , as it is only a few miles away and have a district councillor that serve the area , they should stay under the Boston Skegness zone. They also access the Doctors surgery and William Lovell academy , located in Stickney. Tracy Lamy‐Edwards Stickney Parish councillor. 1 increase further, I believe it could have a significant impact on his ability to potentially carry out his duties effectively for so many proposed constituents. I fully support South Holland District Council (SHDC) but also feel that its views have not been taken into account and I am not surprised that SHDC are prepared to raise a judicial review against the Boundary Committee with regard to this matter. This has gone on for almost 10 years, all at a cost to me, the taxpayer. In summary, I feel pragmatically that this is nothing more that a purely political stunt which will only prove costly to the taxpayer, with no benefit at all to areas where it actually matters to the local people.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Xrades. (Lincolnshire
    784 FAR XRADES. (LINCOLNSHIRE. FARVERS-Continued. Drust George, South Kelsey,Lincoln; Edwards Thomas, Wombwell house,. Drakes Daniel, Morton, Lincoln & at Swallow Fishtaft Toad, Skirbeck, Boston Drakes Daniel (exors. of),The Grange, Drust James, Brandy whaTf, Kirton- Edwards William, Bridge end, Horb- Ludford Magna, Linooln in-Lindsey ling, Folkingham Drakes Ezra, Kingerby, Lincoln Ducker Benj. Barrow Haven, Bull Edwards Wm. Riley, Wrangle, BostoD Drakes James, Bracon, Doncaster Thtcker Herbert, Langholme, West- Edwardson C. Heapham, Gainsboro' Drakes John, Brooklyn house, Lud- woodside, Doncaster Effield John, ~lareham-le-l"en, BostuD ford Parva, Lmcoln Duckering A. West Barkwiih, Wragby Eggleston W. Theddlethorpe S~- Drakes John, Tathwell grange, Tath- Duckering H. Northorpe,Gainsboro' Helen, Louth well, Louth Duckering N. East Barkwith, Lincoln Eggleton Benjamin, Fen, Holbeach Drakes Joseph, Panton, Wragby Duckering Mrs. S. Martin. Lincoln Elding Joseph, Sibsey, Boston Drakes Joseph, Stainton hall, Market Dudding H. (exors. of), Riby,Grmsby Eley George, Roman bank, Skegnes!§ Rasen Duddles Mrs. A. Woodside, Tumby, Eley John Thos. Fulletby, Horncastle- Drakes Mrs. Mildred, Cold Hanworth, Boston Elkington Miss .Ann, Tumby, Boston J..incoln Dudley Hem·y, Sudbrook, Grantham Elkington John, Quad•ring, Spalding Drakes U. West Rasen, Market Rasen Duffield Geo. Owston Ferry,Doncaster Ellerby Fred, Muckton, Louth Drakei Thomas, Beltoft, Doncaster Duffield William, Owston, Owston Ellerby George, Carr lane, Ulceby D1·akes William, Tealby, Lincoln Ferry, Doncaster Ellerby George, Claxby, Lincoln Drakes William, Waddingham, Kir- Duffin G. Croft, Wainfleet .All Saints Ellerby Harry,West .Ashby,Horncastle- ton-in-Lindsey Duffin George, Kelby, Grantham Ellerby John, Northfi.eld, Ulceby Drakes William Wade, Swinhope, Duffin William, Fen, Billingborough, Elletson Job, Habrough, Grimsby :Sorth Thoresby Folkingham Ellinitt W.
    [Show full text]
  • Design & Access Statement
    DESIGN & ACCESS STATEMENT – Plot 2, 23 Brookside, Rearsby. DESIGN & ACCESS STATEMENT Planning Application for Erection of 1 no. New Dwelling 23 Brookside Rearsby Leicestershire PARKINSON DODSON & CHEUNG Chartered Architects 217 Scraptoft Lane, Leicester LE5 2HT t: 0116 2416236 f: 0116 2419068 DESIGN & ACCESS STATEMENT – Plot 2, 23 Brookside, Rearsby. This design and access statement is to accompany a planning application to Charnwood Borough Council for the proposal to take down barn and erect 1no. residential dwelling at 23 Brookside, Rearsby, Leicestershire. The proposal involves the demolition of a redundant and dilapidated barn and the building of a dwelling within the footprint of the original barn unit. OVERVIEW This area of Rearsby is in the centre of the village on the main Leicester-Melton (A607) road and is in North-East Leicestershire, about 7 ½ miles from both towns. It has a population of just under a 1000 and has a number of new housing developments but retains its rural character strong community spirit. The main route through the village is now much quieter following the opening of the Rearsby Bypass and Gaddesby Lane is now a Cul-de-sac. The river Wreake passes beyond the village at Rearsby Mill and is joined by Rearsby brook at the centre of the village. Rearsby still retains its Post Office (at its present time), its local primary school and two Public Houses. In terms of its accessibility, the village is well served with regular bus services between Melton and Leicester at every 20 minute intervals, Monday to Saturday and an hourly service on Sundays.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft South East Lincolnshire Local Plan 2011-2036 (2016)
    South East Lincolnshire Local Plan 2011-2036 Draft for Public Consultation (including site options for development) January 2016 Contents 1. INTRODUCTION 1 2. CONTEXT 6 3. PROMOTING SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES IN SOUTH EAST LINCOLNSHIRE 10 POLICY 1: Presumption in favour of Sustainable Development 11 POLICY 2: Spatial Strategy 11 POLICY 3: Development Management 17 POLICY 4: Strategic Approach to Flood Risk 20 POLICY 5: Meeting Physical Infrastructure and Service Needs 21 POLICY 6: Developer Contributions 23 4. PROMOTING EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES 27 POLICY 7: Improving South East Lincolnshire’s Employment Land Portfolio 28 POLICY 8: Specific Occupier and Restricted Use Sites 32 POLICY 9: Spalding Rail-Freight Interchange 34 POLICY 10: Employment Development in the Countryside 36 5. QUALITY HOUSING FOR ALL 38 POLICY 11: Meeting Objectively Assessed Housing Needs 38 POLICY 12: Distribution of New Housing 40 POLICY 13: A Sustainable Urban Extension for Housing in Spalding 42 POLICY 14: Providing a Mix of Housing 45 POLICY 15: Affordable Housing 46 POLICY 16: Rural Exception Sites 48 POLICY 17: Accommodation for Gypsies, Travellers and Travelling Showpeople 49 POLICY 18: Houses in Multiple Occupation and the Sub-Division of Dwellings 51 POLICY 19: Replacement Dwellings in the Countryside 54 POLICY 20: Conversion of Redundant Buildings to Residential Use 56 POLICY 21: Agricultural, Forestry and other Rural Workers Dwellings 58 6. VIBRANT TOWN CENTRES AND ACCESSIBLE SHOPS AND SERVICES 62 POLICY 22: The Retail Hierarchy 63 POLICY 23: Primary Shopping Frontages 67 POLICY 24: Additional Retail Provision 69 7. A DISTINCTIVE, GREENER, CLEANER, HEALTHIER ENVIRONMENT 72 POLICY 25: The Natural Environment 73 POLICY 26: The Historic Environment 76 POLICY 27: Pollution 80 POLICY 28: Climate Change and Renewable and Low Carbon Energy 81 POLICY 29: Design of New Development 84 POLICY 30: Promoting Safe, Accessible Open Space, Sport and Recreational Facilities 86 8.
    [Show full text]
  • Queniborough Neighbourhood Plan Questionnaire Results
    Queniborough Neighbourhood Plan Questionnaire Results Page | 0 Contents 1. Introduction P. 2 2. Questionnaire Methodology P. 2 3. Summary P. 2 4. Results P. 5 Vision for Queniborough in 2028 P. 6 Traffic & Transport P. 9 Facilities & Services P. 15 Housing P. 19 Heritage P. 32 Environment P. 33 Employment & Business P. 42 Anything Else P. 47 5. Appendix 1 – The Questionnaire P. 56 Page | 1 Residents Questionnaire 1) Introduction The Neighbourhood Plan process will provide residents, businesses, service providers and local organisations with a unique opportunity to help guide development within the designated area, plan the future delivery of local services and facilities, and ensure that Queniborough remains a vibrant and sustainable place to live, work, and do business. To support the successful development of the Queniborough Neighbourhood Plan, the Rural Community Council (Leicestershire & Rutland) supported Queniborough Neighbourhood Plan Steering Group to undertake a consultation with households in the designated area. 2) Questionnaire Methodology A questionnaire was developed by the Neighbourhood Plan Steering Group in conjunction with the Rural Community Council (Leicestershire & Rutland). The final version of the questionnaire (see Appendix 1) and the basis of this report, was available for every household. The questionnaire was 16 sides of A4 in length including the instructions, guidance notes providing further background and context and a map of the designated area. Approximately 1500 questionnaires were delivered to households in the designated area during March 2019 by members and volunteers of the Neighbourhood Plan Steering Group and included an envelope into which the completed questionnaires could be enclosed, sealed and returned at 3 drop of points around the parish.
    [Show full text]
  • Central Lincolnshire Five Year Land Supply Report January 2019 Inc
    Central Lincolnshire Five Year Land Supply Report 1 April 2019 to 31 March 2024 (Published January 2019) Contents 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................ 1 2. POLICY CONTEXT ........................................................................................................ 1 NATIONAL CONTEXT ................................................................................................ 1 THE LOCAL CONTEXT .............................................................................................. 2 3. THE FIVE YEAR REQUIREMENT ................................................................................. 3 PAST COMPLETIONS AND SHORTFALL/SURPLUS ................................................ 3 ADDING BUFFERS .................................................................................................... 5 4. THE FIVE YEAR SUPPLY .............................................................................................. 6 SITES IN THE SUPPLY .............................................................................................. 6 WINDFALL ALLOWANCE .......................................................................................... 7 Small Sites in the Lincoln Urban Area .................................................................. 8 Small Sites in Smaller Settlements and the Rural Area........................................ 8 Other small sites .................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Adopted Central Lincolnshire Local Plan
    CENTRAL LINCOLNSHIRE Local Plan Adopted April 2017 Central Lincolnshire | Local Plan - Adopted April 2017 Foreword Ensuring a flourishing future for Central Lincolnshire Central Lincolnshire is characterised by its diverse and enticing landscape. The magnificent city of Lincoln is embedded within our beautiful landscape and is surrounded by a network of picturesque towns and villages: these places, along with the social and economic opportunities in the area, make Central Lincolnshire a fantastic place to live, work and visit. But there is so much potential to make Central Lincolnshire an even better place. An even better place to live, with quality homes people can afford, easier access to shops, services and facilities, and new thriving communities, which are welcoming and safe. An even better place to work, where new facilities and infrastructure mean that businesses choose to expand or relocate here, bringing jobs and stimulating investment. An even better place to visit, a place where people choose to come to enjoy our nature, our history, our shops, our eateries and attractions, while at the same time significantly contributing to our rural and urban economies. A new Local Plan for Central Lincolnshire can do this. This is the adopted Local Plan for Central Lincolnshire. It was prepared with the benefit of your very helpful comments we received at various draft stages. Inside this adopted Local Plan are policies for the growth and regeneration of Central Lincolnshire over the next 20 years and beyond, including sites allocated for development and other areas designated for protection. The policies within the Local Plan will make sure that our settlements grow in the right way, ensure we have homes and employment where we need them, and ensure our new communities are sustainable, accessible and inclusive.
    [Show full text]
  • The Delius Society Journal Spring 2001, Number 129
    The Delius Society Journal Spring 2001, Number 129 The Delius Society (Registered Charity No. 298662) Full Membership and Institutions £20 per year UK students £10 per year US/\ and Canada US$38 per year Africa, Aust1alasia and far East £23 per year President Felix Aprahamian Vice Presidents Lionel Carley 131\, PhD Meredith Davies CBE Sir Andrew Davis CBE Vernon l Iandley MA, FRCM, D Univ (Surrey) Richard I Iickox FRCO (CHM) Lyndon Jenkins Tasmin Little f CSM, ARCM (I Ions), I Jon D. Lilt, DipCSM Si1 Charles Mackerras CBE Rodney Meadows Robc1 t Threlfall Chain11a11 Roge1 J. Buckley Trcaswc1 a11d M11111/Jrrship Src!l'taiy Stewart Winstanley Windmill Ridge, 82 Jlighgate Road, Walsall, WSl 3JA Tel: 01922 633115 Email: delius(alukonlinc.co.uk Serirta1y Squadron Lcade1 Anthony Lindsey l The Pound, Aldwick Village, West Sussex P021 3SR 'fol: 01243 824964 Editor Jane Armour-Chclu 17 Forest Close, Shawbirch, 'IC!ford, Shropshire TFS OLA Tel: 01952 408726 Email: [email protected] Website: http://www.dclius.org.uk Emnil: [email protected]. uk ISSN-0306-0373 Ch<lit man's Message............................................................................... 5 Edilot ial....................... .... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ... 6 ARTICLES BJigg Fair, by Robert Matthew Walker................................................ 7 Frede1ick Delius and Alf1cd Sisley, by Ray Inkslcr........... .................. 30 Limpsficld Revisited, by Stewart Winstanley....................................... 35 A Forgotten Ballet ?, by Jane Armour-Chclu
    [Show full text]
  • Lincolnshire. [Kelly's
    650 l'UB LINCOLNSHIRE. [KELLY'S PUBLICAMS--continued. Indian Queen, George Thomas Lee, 4 Dolphin lane, Boston G-reat Northern inn, T. Plum tree, Seas end,Surfleet,Spalding Ingleby Arms, John Chas. Schacht, Morton, Gainsborough G-reat Northern hotel, Robert Stuart, High street, Lincoln Iron Horse, William Marsden, Gunhouse, Doncaster G-reat Northern, W. Vaughan,Water st.St.Martin's,Stamford Ivy tavern, Joseph Sharp, 51 Newport, Lincoln G-r~t Northern commercial hotel & posting house, John John Bull, Geo. Drewery, The Heath, Hracebridge, Lincoln Hannam, Corby station, Grantham Joiner's Arms, Henry Ogden, Welbourne S.O Great Northern Railway hotel, T. Colton, Station st. Boston Jolly Sailor, James Dyer, 92 Eastgate, Louth Green Dragon, Dickenson Lynn, Swineshead, Boston Jolly Sailors, William Neal, Fishtoft, Boston Green Dragon, Mrs. Betsy Nundy, West Ashby, Horncastle Jolly Scotchman, Henry 'fhompson, Southgate, Sleaford Green Dragon, Robert Reid, Magpies square, Lincoln King's Arms, William Cox, Hurton Pedwardine, Sleaford Green Man, William Baines, 29 Scotgate, Stamford King's Arms, John Holmes, Theatre yard, High st. Lincoln Green Man, Gunthorpe Green, Scamblesby, Horncastle King's Arms, John Clacton Lee, 13 Horncastle road, Boston Green Man, "\Villiam Ureen, Ropsley, Grantham King's Arms, Walker Moody, Haxey, Bawtry Green Man, George Jas. Murrant, Little Bytham, Granthm King's Head, William Baxter, Morton, Bourn Green Man, Christopher Shepherd, Stallingborough, Ulceby King's Head, Samuel Thomas Beales, East end, Alford Green Man, William Templeman, Gosberton, Spalding King's Head, John Hreeton, 16 Bull ring, Horncastle Green Tree, George Pepper, Fen, Branston, Lincoln King's Head, Wm. Burton,sen. North st.
    [Show full text]
  • Permit: Holmefield Farm Services Limited
    Permit with introductory note The Environmental Permitting (England & Wales) Regulations 2016 Holmefield Farm Services Limited Brandy Wharf Piggery Waddingham Road South Kelsey Market Rasen LN7 6PN Permit number EPR/MP3133QD Permit number EPR/MP3133QD 1 Brandy Wharf Piggery Permit number EPR/MP3133QD Introductory note This introductory note does not form a part of the notice. The main features of the permit are as follows. Brandy Wharf Piggery is situated approximately two kilometres south west of the village of South Kelsey in Lincolnshire. The installation is approximately centred on National Grid Reference TF 02200 97675. The installation is operated by Holmefield Farm Services Limited and is a farrowing to finish operation, comprising of seven pig houses, referenced A, B, C, D, 1, 2 and 3, with a capacity for 650 sows, 2,240 pigs reared up to 30kg, 4,000 production pigs > 30kg and 2 boars. All seven pig houses are ventilated by roof fans with an emission point higher than 5.5 metres above ground level and an efflux speed greater than 10 metres per second. All the houses are fully slatted with slurry stored in underground sealed tanks to a depth of no more than 800mm with frequent removal at least every 10 weeks, to a slurry store or via an exterior valve on the tanks allowing removal of slurry via pumps and an umbilical system. The slurry is spread on neighbouring land owned by a third party. Dirty water from the wash out of pig houses is channelled to underground slurry tanks. Roof water from all houses is collected via gutters and downpipes and directed to a nearby dyke to the east of the installation boundary which is heavily vegetated, and ultimately drains to the Old River Ancholme.
    [Show full text]
  • FARMERS Continued. Teasdale E
    TRADES DIRECTORY. 387 FARMERS continued. Teasdale E. Swineshead, Spalding Thorlby J. Fen, Helpringham, Sleaford Talton J. Altoft end, Friestonl Boston Teat T. Ancaster, Grantham Thorlby W. Helprin~ham, Sleaford Tasker R. Vawthorpe, Gainsborough Tebb M. Fen .Algarkirk, Spalding Thornbury D. Washmgborough,Lincoln Tasker T. Mablethorpe, Alford Tebb T. North end,Swineshead,Spalding Thorndike T. Sloothby Willoughby, Tasker W. Seremby, Spilsby Tebbutt E. Woodhall, Horncastle Spilsby 1 Tatam H. H. Moulton, Holbeach Tebbutt Miss J. Thimbleby, Horncastle ThornhiU R. ~le, Newark Tatam J. Moulton, Holbeacb TebbuttJ. Baumber, Horncastle Thornton G. Ealand, Crowle Tatam T. Dales, Blankney, Sleaford Teesdale I. Fen, Fosdyke, Spaldmg Thornton J, Dorrington, Sleaford Tatam W. Langrick ville, Boston Teesdale I. Hacconby, Bourn Thornton J. Ealand, Crowle Tate J. Tattershall road, Boston Teesdale J. Bilsby, Alford Thornton S. B. Crowle Tateson Charles, offices, King street, Teesdale J. Holbeach marsh, Holbeach Thornton W. jun. Burringham, Bawtry }larket Rasen Teesdale J. Moulton, Holbeach Thornton W. sen. Burringham, Bawtry' Ta teson C. W elton, Lincoln Temperton J. W estgate, Bel ton Thorogood J. Quadring~ Spalding Tawn A. Moulton, Holbeach Temperton J. West Butterwick Thorp I. Holme, Kirton, Boston Tayles W. Fiskerton, Lincoln Temperton R. Woodhouse, Belton Thorp J. Whaplode, Holbeach Taylor J. & G. Gunby,nearColsterwortb Tempest T. Cowbit, Spalding Thorp T. Ewerby Sleaford Taylor A. C. Horbling, Falkingham TempleJ. Crossgate, Algarkirk, Spaldng Thorp W. Fen, ilgarkirk, Spalding Taylor B. SuttonSt.Edmund's,Crowland Temple S. Cowbridge, Boston Thorpe D. Fen, Heckington, Sleafol'd Taylor E. Cove, Ha.uy Temple S. Fishtoft, Boston Thorpe F. Moulton chapel, Holbeach Taylor E. Alvingham, Louth TempleS.
    [Show full text]
  • REPORT on the Trail of Lincolnshire Plesiosaurs
    REPORT average iron content of 20-22%. Production reached a peak of 70,000 tons in 1880 as working proceeded northwards alongside and west of the railway. The On the trail of Lincolnshire plesiosaurs Marlstone consisted of two layers that were extracted separately due to their different contents of iron minerals and calcium carbonate. The search for the Lincolnshire plesiosaurs started It seems most likely that the wall was built from the with the message ‘Geology, not Archaeology’, on a upper layer, a light yellowish-brown, fissile, flaggy Saturday morning telephone call from environmental limestone that contrasted with the lower, darker, less archaeologist James Rackham. A local builder had just calcareous beds. Local concentrations of brachiopods phoned him to report what appeared to be some bones occurred in these upper beds, including rhynchonellids stuck in a stone. Since the discovery had been made in (that could be seen in places between the bones on the the next village to the author’s home in Lincolnshire, specimen prior to cleaning). During recent re-mapping he went to have a look. of the area the brachiopods were more fully identified On the outskirts of Caythorpe, he found Andy and were taken to indicate a Tilton subprovince of the Craig, a Derbyshire champion dry stone waller, spinatum zone of the Upper Pliensbachian Stage of the repairing an old ironstone wall. He had picked up a Middle Lias, although no zonal ammonites were large stone that had not fitted into the next space, so he discovered (Brandon, 1987). had turned it over to see if it fitted better the other way Andy Craig returned to repair the next section of up.
    [Show full text]
  • Frisby on the Wreake Neighbourhood Plan Referendum Version
    FRISBY ON THE WREAKE NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN REFERENDUM VERSION Date: April 2018. Frisby on the Wreake: Neighbourhood Plan CONTENTS Contents ..............................................................................................................................................................2 Our Vision for Frisby on the Wreake ...................................................................................................................4 Introduction to Neighbourhood Planning ...........................................................................................................5 1. Why Neighbourhood Plans are important .............................................................................................6 2. Community Values .................................................................................................................................6 3. Introducing the Neighbourhood Plan .....................................................................................................8 Frisby on the Wreake’s Heritage ............................................................................................................9 Designated Area for Neighbourhood Plan .......................................................................................... 12 Demographic Factors .......................................................................................................................... 12 Sustainable Development ..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]