DOCSLIB.ORG

The Case of Beauvoir, Camus, and Sartre

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

University of New Mexico UNM Digital Repository Foreign Languages & Literatures ETDs Electronic Theses and Dissertations 7-1-2016 The thicE s and Politics of Love in Postwar France: The aC se of Beauvoir, Camus, and Sartre Christian Wood Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/fll_etds Part of the Comparative Literature Commons, and the French and Francophone Language and Literature Commons Recommended Citation Wood, Christian. "The thicE s and Politics of Love in Postwar France: The asC e of Beauvoir, Camus, and Sartre." (2016). https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/fll_etds/110 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Electronic Theses and Dissertations at UNM Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Foreign Languages & Literatures ETDs by an authorized administrator of UNM Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Christian Charles Wood Candidate Foreign Languages and Literatures Department This dissertation is approved, and it is acceptable in quality and form for publication: Approved by the Dissertation Committee: Dr. Raji Vallury, Chairperson Dr. Walter Putnam Dr. Stephen Bishop Dr. Iain Thomson THE ETHICS AND POLITICS OF LOVE IN POST-WAR FRANCE: THE CASE OF BEAUVOIR, CAMUS, AND SARTRE By Christian Charles Wood B.A., Philosophy, University of California, San Diego, 1999 M.A., Philosophy, University of New Mexico, 2005 M.A., French, University of New Mexico, 2009 Ph.D., Philosophy, University of New Mexico, 2010 DISSERTATION Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy French Studies The University of New Mexico Albuquerque, New Mexico July, 2016 ! Dedication The gratitude for helping to make this project what it is extends to several layers of support, care, and guidance. To my parents, Hinano and Chris, for always believing in me. I love you. To the Department of Foreign Languages and Literatures, University of New Mexico, for your wonderful community and culture. I already miss you dearly. To Carol Raymond, for her focused generosity. A good half of this project was completed thanks to your funding. It will always mean a lot to me. To Dr. Marina Peters-Newell, who taught me so much along the way. You have tremendously shaped the person who wrote this work, always for the better. To my internal committee member Dr. Walter Putnam, whose deep understanding and questioning of amorous discourse has always kept me on my toes. Thank you for passing on those dozens of articles! To my internal committee member Dr. Stephen Bishop, for helping me to see what I don’t see. You have consistently been one of the best people I’ve known. To my outside committee member Dr. Iain Thomson, who galvanized, and still accompanies me on this long and tremendous intellectual journey. Lastly, to my dissertation Director Dr. Raji Vallury, whose unblinking guidance, and occasional punch in the arm, have shaped and hardened this project. My gratitude for your counsel and for the person you are is eternal. iii ! THE ETHICS AND POLITICS OF LOVE IN POST-WAR FRANCE: THE CASE OF BEAUVOIR, CAMUS, AND SARTRE By CHRISTIAN CHARLES WOOD B.A., Philosophy, University of California, San Diego, 1999 M.A., Philosophy, University of New Mexico, 2005 M.A., French, University of New Mexico, 2009 Ph.D., Philosophy, University of New Mexico, 2010 Ph.D., French Studies, University of New Mexico, 2016 ABSTRACT The Ethics and Politics of Love focuses primarily upon Simone de Beauvoir, Albert Camus, and Jean-Paul Sartre during the period 1935 to 1960, specifically the periods before and after the Second World War (1939 – 1945), and the Franco-Algerian War (1954 – 1962). I argue that inquiring into each thinker’s theory of love yields crucial and hitherto unexplored insights into their ethical and political theories: “love” thus represents my particular Ariadne’s thread to guide us into, and then back outside of their daunting oeuvres and singular lives. I use their documented thoughts on love as an analytical tool with which to interrogate the basic motivations for, and premises and conclusions of their ethics and politics. Their amorous theory thus essentially charts the main course of their engaged lives and works. This particular method of inquiry has been overlooked by both Anglophone and Francophone critics, and so my contribution yields new perspectives from which to critique the thought of three of the most influential authors and philosophers of twentieth-century France. The interpretive argument signposts the intellectual development of the three main iv ! protagonists alongside key historical events such as: the rise and fall of European fascism, the Occupation, the historical problematic of French colonial practices, and finally, each thinker’s respective interventions in the Franco-Algerian War. The results are significant, offering novel explanations of the grounds for their socio-economic policy, political solidarity, wartime interventions, and the key political changes in their lives and works generally construed. v ! Table of Contents Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 1! Chapter One: Camus’s Ladder: The Steps to a Politics of Love ........................................ 6! The Phenomenon of Love in Camus’s Early Life: Stability’s Shortcomings ............... 9! Donjuanism as a Lucid, Solitary Way of Understanding in an Absurd World........... 18! “For Fear of Suffering Again”: The Ripples from Camus’s First Stable Love .......... 30! The Decisive Lesson of Camus’s First Love: Detachment Leads to Liberation ........ 34! The Decisive Step: Solidarity, Liberation, and Love .................................................. 46! Ways in which Letters to a German Friend Leads to Combat: Love’s Rebirth......... 51! The Importance of Combat: Love Leads to Victory ................................................... 58! What was Combat? ..................................................................................................... 59! Camus at Combat ........................................................................................................ 60! Camus’s Quickened Heart: Lessons from 1944 - 1946 .............................................. 62! A Just, Communitarian Love ...................................................................................... 76! Conclusion: Love’s Future Promise ........................................................................... 80! Works Cited ................................................................................................................ 82! Primary sources:.............................................................................................. 82! Secondary sources:.......................................................................................... 83! Works consulted (websites): ........................................................................... 83! Chapter Two: Beauvoir and Sartre—Love as a Normative Principle ............................. 84! 2.1: A Portrait of Two Young Lovers: Latent Tendencies ......................................... 87! Jean-Paul Sartre .............................................................................................. 87! Simone de Beauvoir ...................................................................................... 102! vi ! 2.2: What Is a Love Pact? Beauvoir and Sartre in Practice ...................................... 117! 2.3: To Engineer a Family (1938 – 1943): Cells, and The Intersubjective Circle .... 131! 2.4: The Ethics of Their Love: 1943 - 1945.............................................................. 155! Conclusion: Redemption? ......................................................................................... 166! Works Cited .............................................................................................................. 168! Primary sources ............................................................................................. 168! Secondary sources ......................................................................................... 168! Articles .......................................................................................................... 169! Chapter Three: The Politics of Love: Camus, Algeria .................................................... 170! 3.1: Camus’s Political Legacy, Algeria, and the Anticipated Argument .................. 172! 3.2: Situating Camus’s Politics in Form and Content ............................................... 175! 3.3: Rereading the Heart and Love Politically .......................................................... 183! 3.4: The Rebel’s Critique of Modern Revolutions .................................................... 190! 3.5: The Romantic Character of Camusian Politics .................................................. 203! 3.6: Critiquing the Scholarship via Camus’s Theory of Love .................................. 215! 3.7: Rethinking Algeria: Romantic Tragedy ............................................................. 227! Conclusion ................................................................................................................ 246! Works Cited .............................................................................................................. 247! Primary sources ............................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Francois Mauriac and Le Journal D'un Cure

    Francois Mauriac and Le Journal D'un Cure

    A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF LE NOEUD DE VIPERES BY FRANCOIS MAURIAC AND LE JOURNAL D'UN CURE DE CAMPAGNE BY GEORGES BERNANOS A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF ATLANTA UNIVERSITY IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS BY JULIAN KENNETH SMITH DEPARTMENT OF FRENCH ATLANTA, GEORGIA JULY 1970 I) ABSTRACT FRENCH SMITH, JULIAN KENNETH B.A., Morris Brown College, 1962 A Comoagative Analysis of Le Hoead de vipe»gea bv Francois Mauglac and Le Journal d'un cur^ de eampame by Georges Bernanos Adviser: Professor Benjamin F. Hudson Master of Ares degree conferred July 1970 Thesis dated July 1970 The principal aim of the paper is to analyse on© novel by Francois Mauriac, and one by Georges Bernanos. After analysing the novels, the writer desires to compare the character development, the plot, the style and the themes of each novel. The results should reveal certain sim ilarities and differences in each of the novels studied. The study consists of four chapters. Chapter one, the introduction, is devoted to a presentation of the social, cultural and political milieu in which Mauriac and Bernanos lived. It includes a brief biographical sketch of each author. An analysis of Le Moeud de vloeres is given in Chapter two, and in Chapter three, an analysis of Le Journal d'un cure de campagne is presented. The fourth chapter is the major pare of the study. In this chapter, the writer seelce to compare the s&nilarities and differences of the novels under consideration* It is observed that Mauriac and Bernanos used religious hypoerlcy, marital or family discord, pride and avarice as a basis to discuss sin and evil in the society of their times.
  • REVIEW Alain Badiou, Theory of the Subject (New York: Continuum, 2009)

    REVIEW Alain Badiou, Theory of the Subject (New York: Continuum, 2009)

    Tomas Marttila 2010 ISSN: 1832-5203 Foucault Studies, No. 10, pp. 173-177, November 2010 REVIEW Alain Badiou, Theory of the Subject (New York: Continuum, 2009), ISBN: 978-0826496737 (1) Badiou’s Post-Political Ontology of the Subject Alongside Jacques Ranciere, Jean-Luc Nancy, Gilles Deleuze and Claude Lefort, Alain Badiou is one of the most influential and productive French philosophers of our times. Contemporary French post-foundational philosophy is split into a Lacanian and a Heideggerian stream. The Lacanian stream is more relevant than ever today, as it has been predominant in the works of, amongst others, Ernesto Laclau, Slavoj Žižek and, more recently, Jason Glynos and Yannis Stavrakakis. Marchart has observed the ‘Heideggerian’ influence above all in the works of Alain Badiou, Gilles Deleuze, Jacques Derrida and Michel Foucault.1 Alain Badiou’s Theory of the Subject (French: Théorie du Sujet), published for the first time in 1982, combines both La- canian and Heideggerian philosophy and, in this regard, reflects some of the most central philosophical ideas in recent French post-foundational philosophy. In today’s globalized post-cold-war neo-liberal world, the developments in communist China and the Soviet Union described in Theory of the Subject appear out of time. This anachronism does not, however, account for Badiou’s thought as such. Based on the works of Hegel, Hei- degger and Lacan, Theory of the Subject provides a universal ontology of the political subject. Despite its slightly misleading title, Theory of the Subject is a book about politics as a particular truth event, which makes the political subject appear as the promise of the truth to come.
  • Badiou Beyond Formalization? on the Ethics of the Subject

    Badiou Beyond Formalization? on the Ethics of the Subject

    FILOZOFIA ___________________________________________________________________________Roč. 72, 2017, č. 9 BADIOU BEYOND FORMALIZATION? ON THE ETHICS OF THE SUBJECT JAN-JASPER PERSIJN, Centre for the History of Philosophy and Continental Philosophy (HICO), Department of Philosophy and Moral Sciences, Ghent University, Belgium PERSIJN, J.-J.: Badiou beyond Formalization? On the Ethics of the Subject FILOZOFIA 72, 2017, No. 9, pp. 724-735 The paper addresses the tension between Badiou’s claim that his theory of the sub- ject must be considered first of all as a ‘formal’ theory, and a certain genealogical history of his notion of the subject. In the latter case, it seems that a very specific political experience has played a crucial role (at least) for Badiou in his early con- ception of the subject. More particularly, the paper addresses this tension from an ethical perspective. As for the claim repeatedly made in his work (that the subject poses in the first place a formal problem), one can identify an implicitly ethical disposition in the formalization itself. At the same time, there are several formula- tions in his writings that seem to exceed the formal level. The paper examines four concepts or formulations appearing in his three main books (Theory of the Subject, Being and Event, Logics of Worlds) that seem to express a more or less explicit ethical dimension, namely his theory of affects, the principle ‘to decide the unde- cidable’, the contrast between ‘fidelity’ and ‘confidence’ and Badiou’s answer to the question What is it to live? The paper’s aim is to pinpoint the difference be- tween the ethical stance implied in the formal description of Badiou’s theory of the subject and an explicit ‘ethics of the subject’.
  • Freedom Quotes, May 2015 May 1. Freedom Is Not Worth Having If It

    Freedom Quotes, May 2015 May 1. Freedom Is Not Worth Having If It

    Freedom Quotes, May 2015 May 1. Freedom is not worth having if it does not include the freedom to make mistakes. Mahatma Ganhdi May 2. When a man is denied the right to live the life he believes in, he has no choice but to become an outlaw. Nelson Mandela May 3. The most important kind of freedom is to be what you really are. You trade in your reality for a role. There can’t be any large-scale revolution until there’s a personal revolution, on an individual level. It’s got to happen inside first. Jim Morrison May 4. Freedom lies in being bold. Robert Frost May 5. People demand freedom of speech as a compensation for the freedom of thought they seldom use. Soren Kierkegaard May 6. Those who deny freedom to others, deserve it not for themselves. Abraham Lincoln May 7. I am free, no matter what rules surround me. If I find them tolerable, I tolerate them; if I find them too obnoxious, I break them. I am free because I know that I alone am morally responsible for everything I do. Robert A. Heinlein May 8. If we don’t believe in freedom of expression for people we despise, we don’t believe in it at all. Noam Chomsky May 9. Freedom is nothing else but a chance to be better. Albert Camus May 10. ---To be free is not merely to cast off one’s chains, but to live in a way that respects and enhances the freedom of others. Nelson Mandela May 11.
  • A Musing with Alain Badiou À La 'Dialogue Between a Chinese

    A Musing with Alain Badiou À La 'Dialogue Between a Chinese

    Volume Four, Number One A Musing with Alain Badiou à la ‘Dialogue Between a Chinese Philosopher and a French Philosopher’,1 or, An Exercise in Self-Reference Kyoo Lee John Jay College, CUNY, NYC Free Badiou! The Same, Sex Problem in Alain Badiou on Love, and One Possible, Queer Solution from the Master Himself […] or Herself? 1 The event: ‘Alain Badiou: Dialogue between a Chinese Philosopher and French Philosopher’, 13 December 2014, The Educational Alliance, NYC. Badiou Studies 2 And “What is Love?” Alain Badiou asks and answers: Page | 124 […] The question of sex is the primary obscurity, a difference thinkable only at the cost of a laborious determination of identity that it puts to work. Let us add that contemporary philosophy addresses itself at all times to women. It might even be suspected that it is, as discourse, partly a strategy of seduction. Cogito Interruptus:3 Or subtraction, you mean? Besides, it is from the bias of love that philosophy touches upon the sexes, to the extent that it is to Plato that Lacan must look for what hold thought has over the love of transference. Such or any, as one might already know, truth is essentially an empty category for Badiou – it is produced, in Badiou’s own words, as a hole in knowledge, an unnameable element. It is essentially something which is indiscernible to either language or mathematical counting. Hence, Badiou’s recourse to a philosophy of foundations grounded on mathematical logic 2 Alain Badiou, “What is Love?,” UMBR (a), 1996, p.37. 3 Kyoo Lee, ‘Cogito Interruptus: The Epistolary Body in the Elisabeth-Descartes Correspondence, June 22, 1645-November 3, 1645’, philoSOPHIA 1.2 (2011), 173-94.
  • Uyghur Dispossession, Culture Work and Terror Capitalism in a Chinese Global City Darren T. Byler a Dissertati

    Uyghur Dispossession, Culture Work and Terror Capitalism in a Chinese Global City Darren T. Byler a Dissertati

    Spirit Breaking: Uyghur Dispossession, Culture Work and Terror Capitalism in a Chinese Global City Darren T. Byler A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Washington 2018 Reading Committee: Sasha Su-Ling Welland, Chair Ann Anagnost Stevan Harrell Danny Hoffman Program Authorized to Offer Degree: Anthropology ©Copyright 2018 Darren T. Byler University of Washington Abstract Spirit Breaking: Uyghur Dispossession, Culture Work and Terror Capitalism in a Chinese Global City Darren T. Byler Chair of the Supervisory Committee: Sasha Su-Ling Welland, Department of Gender, Women, and Sexuality Studies This study argues that Uyghurs, a Turkic-Muslim group in contemporary Northwest China, and the city of Ürümchi have become the object of what the study names “terror capitalism.” This argument is supported by evidence of both the way state-directed economic investment and security infrastructures (pass-book systems, webs of technological surveillance, urban cleansing processes and mass internment camps) have shaped self-representation among Uyghur migrants and Han settlers in the city. It analyzes these human engineering and urban planning projects and the way their effects are contested in new media, film, television, photography and literature. It finds that this form of capitalist production utilizes the discourse of terror to justify state investment in a wide array of policing and social engineering systems that employs millions of state security workers. The project also presents a theoretical model for understanding how Uyghurs use cultural production to both build and refuse the development of this new economic formation and accompanying forms of gendered, ethno-racial violence.
  • Six Political Philosophies in Search of a Virus: Critical Perspectives on the Coronavirus Pandemic

    Six Political Philosophies in Search of a Virus: Critical Perspectives on the Coronavirus Pandemic

    LSE ‘Europe in Question’ Discussion Paper Series Six political philosophies in search of a virus: Critical perspectives on the coronavirus pandemic Gerard Delanty LEQS Paper No. 156/2020 May 2020 Editorial Board Dr Bob Hancké Dr Vassilis Monastiriotis Dr Sonja Avlijas Dr Cristóbal Garibay-Petersen Dr Pieter Tuytens Mr Toon Van Overbeke All views expressed in this paper are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of the editors or the LSE. © Gerard Delanty Six political philosophies in search of a virus: Critical perspectives on the coronavirus pandemic Gerard Delanty * Abstract The Coronavirus (Covid-19) poses interesting questions for social and political thought. These include the nature and limits of the ethical responsibility of the state, personal liberty and collective interests, human dignity, and state surveillance. As many countries throughout the world declared states of emergency, some of the major questions in political philosophy become suddenly highly relevant. Foucault’s Writings on biopolitical securitization and Agamben’s notion of the state of exception take on a new reality, as do the classical arguments of utilitarianism and libertarianism. In this paper, I discuss six main philosophical responses to the pandemic, including provocative interventions made by Agamben, Badieu, and Zizek, Latour on the governance of life and death as Well as the Kantian perspective of Habermas on human dignity. Keywords: Agamben, Badieu, Utilitarianism, Habermas, libertarianism, Latour, nudge theory, Zizek, * School of Law, Politics and Sociology, University of Sussex Email: [email protected] Acknowledgments This is an expanded version of a short essay that appeared in the Hong Kong Review of Books in May 2020.
  • Georges Bernanos and Francis Poulenc Catholic Convergences in Dialogues of the Carmelites

    Georges Bernanos and Francis Poulenc Catholic Convergences in Dialogues of the Carmelites

    Mark Bosco, SJ Georges Bernanos and Francis Poulenc Catholic Convergences in Dialogues of the Carmelites Francis Poulenc’s Dialogues of the Carmelites ranks as one of the most Catholic operas of the twentieth century, as theologi- cally insightful as it is lyrically beautiful. Except perhaps for Olivier Messiaen’s modernist masterpiece Saint François d’Assise (which has sadly had only one U.S. production to date, San Francisco Opera, 2000), no other opera in the canon combines twentieth-century musical sensibilities with such profound theological themes on Catholic mysticism, martyrdom, and redemption. In this regard Dialogues has no peer in stature, recognition, and performance. Part of the opera’s beauty is due to Poulenc’s own musical genius; part is due to Georges Bernanos’s text that Poulenc was inspired to use as his libretto; and part is due to the deep understanding of Catholic faith that both Poulenc and Bernanos shared. Composed in 1956, the opera is based on the true story of six- teen Carmelite nuns of Compiènge, guillotined during the final throes of the French Revolution’s Reign of Terror. Their story of martyrdom is a remarkable episode in the history of the Catholic faith in revolutionary France. As early as September 1792, the Car- melites of Compiènge, like all other monastic religious institutions logos 12:2 spring 2009 18 logos in France, were forced to leave their cloister and disband. Forbid- den by law to meet or hold religious services, they decided secretly to make a corporate “act of consecration whereby they would of- fer themselves as a sacrifice that the ills afflicting the Church and our unhappy kingdom might cease.”1 The disbanded nuns were thus arrested on June 21, 1794, for the crime of assembling illegally.
  • Albert Camus and Absurd Communication: from Undecidability to Übercommunication

    Albert Camus and Absurd Communication: from Undecidability to Übercommunication

    Albert Camus and Absurd Communication: From Undecidability to Übercommunication by Jorge Lizarzaburu B.A., USFQ, 2010 A thesis submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Colorado in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Master of Arts Department of Communication 2012 This thesis entitled: Albert Camus and Absurd Communication: From Undecidability to Übercommunication written by Jorge M. Lizarzaburu has been approved for the Department of Communication Gerard Hauser Janice Peck Robert Craig Date 5/31/2012 The final copy of this thesis has been examined by the signatories, and we Find that both the content and the form meet acceptable presentation standards Of scholarly work in the above mentioned discipline iii Lizarzaburu, Jorge M. (M.A., Communication, Department of Communication) Albert Camus and Absurd Communication: From Undecidability to Übercommunication Thesis directed by professor Gerard Hauser Communication conceived as understanding is a normative telos among scholars in the field. Absurdity, in the work of Albert Camus, can provide us with a framework to go beyond communication understood as a binary (understanding and misunderstanding) and propose a new conception of communication as absurd. That is, it is an impossible task, however necessary thus we need to embrace its absurdity and value the effort itself as much as the result. Before getting into Camus’ arguments I explain the work of Friedrich Nietzsche to understand the French philosopher in more detail. I describe eternal recurrence and Übermensch as two concepts that can be related to communication as absurd. Then I explain Camus’ notion of absurdity using a Nietzschean lens.
  • The Uniqueness of Persons in the Life and Thought of Karol Wojtyła/Pope John Paul II, with Emphasis on His Indebtedness to Max Scheler

    The Uniqueness of Persons in the Life and Thought of Karol Wojtyła/Pope John Paul II, with Emphasis on His Indebtedness to Max Scheler

    Chapter 3 The Uniqueness of Persons in the Life and Thought of Karol Wojtyła/Pope John Paul II, with Emphasis on His Indebtedness to Max Scheler Peter J. Colosi In a way, his [Pope John Paul II’s] undisputed contribution to Christian thought can be understood as a profound meditation on the person. He enriched and expanded the concept in his encyclicals and other writings. These texts represent a patrimony to be received, collected and assimilated with care.1 - Pope Benedict XVI INTRODUCTION Throughout the writings of Karol Wojtyła, both before and after he became Pope John Paul II, one finds expressions of gratitude and indebtedness to the philosopher Max Scheler. It is also well known that in his Habilitationsschrift,2 Wojtyła concluded that Max Scheler’s ethical system cannot cohere with Christian ethics. This state of affairs gives rise to the question: which of the ideas of Scheler did Wojtyła embrace and which did he reject? And also, what was Wojtyła’s overall attitude towards and assessment of Scheler? A look through all the works of Wojtyła reveals numerous expressions of gratitude to Scheler for philosophical insights which Wojtyła embraced and built upon, among them this explanation of his sources for The Acting Person, Granted the author’s acquaintance with traditional Aristotelian thought, it is however the work of Max Scheler that has been a major influence upon his reflection. In my overall conception of the person envisaged through the mechanisms of his operative systems and their variations, as presented here, may indeed be seen the Schelerian foundation studied in my previous work.3 I have listed many further examples in the appendix to this paper.
  • Briefings on Existence

    Briefings on Existence

    Briefings on Existence A Short Treatise on Transitory Ontology Alain Badiou TRANSLATED. LDITLD, AND WITH AN INTRODUCTION BY Norman Madarasz State University of New York Press Tins work is published with support from the French Ministry of Culture / National Book Center. Ouvrage public arec I'aide du Ministere fran^ais charge de la Culture’ / Centre national du livre. Originally published in France under the title Court Traitc d’ontologie transitoire Copyright: © 1998, Editions de Seuil All rights reserved English translation made by agreement with Editions du Seuil Published by State University of New York Press, Albany English translation © 2006 State University of New York All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America For information, address State University of New York Press 194 Washington Avenue, Suite 305, Albany, NY 12210-2384 Production by Diane Ganeles Marketing by Susan M. Petrie Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Badiou, Alain. [Court traite d'ontologie transitoire. English] Briefings on existence : a short treatise on transitory ontology / Alain Badiou ; translated, edited and with an introduction by Norman Madarasz. p. cm. — (SUNY series, intersections— philosophy and critical theory) Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN-13: 978-0-7914-6803-6 (hardcover : alk. paper) ISBN-10: 0-7914-6803-8 (hardcover : alk. paper) ISBN-13: 978-0-7914-6804-3 (pbk. : alk. paper) ISBN-10: 0-7914-6804-6 (pbk. : alk. paper) 1. Ontology. 1. Madarasz, Norman. II. Title. III. Intersections (Albany, NY) BD3 12.B3213 2006 I I I— dc22 2005033878 10 98765432 I I call “transitory ontology” the ontology unfolding between the sci­ ence of Being qua Being, that is, the theory of the pure manifold, and the science of appearing, that is, the logic of the consistency of actually presented universes.
  • Albert Camus' Dialogue with Nietzsche and Dostoevsky Sean Derek Illing Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, Sillin12@Gmail.Com

    Albert Camus' Dialogue with Nietzsche and Dostoevsky Sean Derek Illing Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, [email protected]

    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 2014 Between nihilism and transcendence : Albert Camus' dialogue with Nietzsche and Dostoevsky Sean Derek Illing Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations Part of the Political Science Commons Recommended Citation Illing, Sean Derek, "Between nihilism and transcendence : Albert Camus' dialogue with Nietzsche and Dostoevsky" (2014). LSU Doctoral Dissertations. 1393. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations/1393 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please [email protected]. BETWEEN NIHILISM AND TRANSCENDENCE: ALBERT CAMUS’ DIALOGUE WITH NIETZSCHE AND DOSTOEVSKY A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The Department of Political Science by Sean D. Illing B.A., Louisiana State University, 2007 M.A., University of West Florida, 2009 May 2014 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This dissertation is the product of many supportive individuals. I am especially grateful for Dr. Cecil Eubank’s guidance. As a teacher, one can do no better than Professor Eubanks. Although his Socratic glare can be terrifying, there is always love and wisdom in his instruction. It is no exaggeration to say that this work would not exist without his support. At every step, he helped me along as I struggled to articulate my thoughts.