Mercury in the Headwaters Tour the Sierra Fund Presents

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Mercury in the Headwaters Tour the Sierra Fund Presents The Sierra Fund Presents Reclaiming the Sierra 2019: Mercury in the Headwaters Tour Friday, October 18 A day-long excursion to explore headwater sources of mercury and discuss opportunities to restore ecosystem and community resiliency in the Yuba and Bear River watersheds. 9:00 am- 5:00 pm Tour Agenda TIME LOCATION 8:30-9:00 am Meet at Gold Miner’s Inn- Load into Buses and Vans 9:30-11:15 am STOP 1: Englebright Dam Speaker: Carrie Monohan, Ph.D., The Sierra Fund, Hydraulic Mine Features: Debris Control Dams 11:30 am- 12:00 pm STOP 2: Blue Point Speakers: Brian Bisnett, Blue Point Partners, Blue Point Mine: Past, Present, and Future Elizabeth “Izzy” Martin, The Sierra Fund, Due Diligence on Mine-Scarred Lands 12:30-1:30 pm Sycamore Ranch Lunch and Networking 1:30-2:30 pm Hammon Grove Park Speakers: Alexandria Keeble-Toll, M.A., M.Sc., The Sierra Fund, Mercury-Contaminated Fish Carrie Monohan, Ph.D., The Sierra Fund, Yuba Goldfields: Hydraulic Mine Debris: Barriers and Opportunities Bonus Tour 3:00-5:00 pm Combie Reservoir Speakers: Carrie Monohan, Ph.D., The Sierra Fund, Hydraulic Mines and Reservoir Sedimentation Greg Jones, Nevada Irrigation District, Reservoir Maintenance: Removal of Mercury-Contaminated Sediment Nick Graham, M.S., The Sierra Fund, Combie Reservoir Monitoring Plan Englebright Dam Hydraulic Mine Features: Debris Control Dams SAWYER DECISION: Northern California was the birthplace Hydraulic mining of hydraulic gold mining in 1853. In the subsequent 30 years a altered the remarkable amount (>one billion cubic meters) of hydraulic mining sediment was generated in the northern Sierra Nevada. topography of Downstream valley farmland of the Sacramento region was repeatedly flooded and destroyed by mining debris. In response to the Sierra Nevada this, residents of Marysville formed the “Anti-Debris Association” headwaters. and implored the State Legislature to regulate mining operations. In 1882 Marysville property owner Edward Woodruff filed suit against Powerful water the North Bloomfield Mining and Gravel Company, which among other mines operated the hydraulic mine Malakoff Diggins. Hydraulic cannons washed mining was “banned” in 1884 after the California courts heard the away mountaintops Woodruff v. North Bloomfield Mining and Gravel Company case and Judge Lorenzo Sawyer ruled in favor of Woodruff. This action, which and cut into became known as the “Sawyer Decision,” is widely acknowledged as hillsides, and much California’s first environmental law. of this material Hydraulic mining recommenced after Congress passed the Caminetti Act of 1893 and continued until 1950. The Caminetti remains in the Act permitted hydraulic mining to occur as long as sediments were headwaters today. captured and not allowed to reach “navigable waters.” This resulted in numerous Debris Control Dams (DCDs) of varying size and type (log cribs, rammed earth and concrete) being built across the headwaters. The California Debris Commission (CDC) identified four locations for large debris control dams on rivers, of which two were constructed: North Fork Dam on the North Fork of the American River and Englebright Dam on the South Yuba River. DCDs have long outlived their purpose, but continue to interrupt longitudinal connectivity of habitat, and sediment and nutrient regimes in the watersheds. These man-made structures continue to accumulate hydraulic mine debris and represent a unique opportunity to remove mercury-contaminated sediment from the aquatic environment. ENGLEBRIGHT DAM: Englebright Dam, a 260 ft. high concrete barrier, was constructed in 1941 by the CDC for the specific purpose of holding back debris generated by hydraulic mining. Englebright serves as the afterbay for New Bullards Reservoir hydropower facilities but does not provide any additional benefits, such as water delivery, power generation, or flood control. With a holding capacity of 70,000 acre feet of water, since its construction, Englebright Dam has trapped ~23,000,000 cubic yards of mercury-contaminated sediment, or roughly 25% of its original storage capacity. The dam represents the upstream limit of anadromous fish passage for Spring-run and Fall-run Chinook. OPPORTUNITIES FOR RECOVERY: Removal of mercury-contaminated sediment followed by removal or modification of Englebright Dam would open up a minimum of 60 additional miles of previously unreachable habitat for anadromous fish. Additional benefits of dam removal include restored natural flow, sediment, and nutrient regimes, reduced mercury methylation potential in the reservoir, and ultimately reduced mercury exposure risk for those who consume locally caught fish. The Sierra Fund is investigating previously unexplored options of sediment removal techniques for the accumulated hydraulic mine debris behind Englebright and the potential for multiple benefits, including sellable aggregates. NEXT STEPS: Mercury and sediment removal may make it feasible to restore longitudinal and lateral connectivity in the Yuba River if it allows for dam removal options or modification. TSF worked with Great Lakes Dredging Company to develop a preliminary feasibility study for sediment removal from Englebright. Specifically, we looked at the opportunity to remove 17M yd3 of sediment using a dredge. This is the volume of sediment that would need to be removed to allow for Englebright Dam to be lowered for a fish ladder. TSF is also working with Dennis Gathard of Gathard Engineering Consulting who wrote the preliminary feasibility study for Yuba River Fish Passage Improvement Investigation for National Marine Fisheries Service in April 2014 to determine why the opportunity for modification or removal of Englebright was not pursued. In 2014 dam modification, or lowering, to allow for volitional fish passage was estimated to cost between 60-64 million dollars. Blue Point Mine Past, Present, and Future HYDRAULIC MINING: Over the period of 1853 to 1893, gold mining rapidly changed from consisting of individual miners using pans-and-hands to industrialized mining. In their fervent quest to find gold, miners developed some of the most innovative engineering feats of their time to aid in the process. Hydraulic mining altered the topography of the Sierra Nevada headwaters as powerful water cannons (hydraulic monitors) were used to wash away mountaintops and cut into hillsides in search of gold-bearing gravels deposited in ancient river beds. Hydraulic mining was very successful in the Sierra because abundant surface water was available. By 1865, miners had constructed an estimated 5,000 miles of flumes, ditches, and canals to convey water to mine sites across the western slope of the Sierra. Historically, material “power washed” from the hillsides was directed through sluice ditches and tunnels. Often, miners added mercury to the material washing through these sluice ditches and tunnels to facilitate gold recovery, subsequently discharging mercury-contaminated sediments to adjacent waterways. BLUE POINT MINE PAST: This was once the site of the Gold- Rush era town of Sucker Flat – and of the Blue Point and Blue Gravel Mines, two of the richest hydraulic mines in California. The water for the operation came from Nevada City and Grass Valley in the Excelsior and China Ditches. The hydraulic slurry was carried out in long sluice tunnels carved at great expense through hard basaltic rock. The 2/3-mile long Excelsior Tunnel was built by crews working from either end and at a mid-point air shaft. The tunnel was lined with chunks of wood and mercury was distributed throughout to capture gold as the slurry passed through. By 1877 a reported $13 million in gold had been mined from Blue Point, but the vast amounts of rock and gravel washed into the river caused tremendous destruction downstream. In 1884, the Sawyer Decision, supported by the valley’s farmers, stopped the thriving industry in its tracks. BLUE POINT MINE PRESENT: Left alone and all but forgotten for over a century, the property has largely revegetated itself. The town of Sucker Flat has vanished, and is occupied only by the cows which graze its grasses. The unique geology remains exposed on the cliff walls, where the Smartsville intrusive complex, a Jurassic volcanic and plutonic arc, is one of the only known locations on earth where basalt is seen on the surface of the geologic profile. In 2008 a reclamation project combined recycled green waste and mine tailings to create topsoil, which was spread across the valley floor and seeded, and the following spring the wildflowers returned. BLUE POINT MINE FUTURE: The Excelsior Foundation has a vision for Blue Point – that its 505 acres of natural and historic resources, its ditches and trails, its escarpments and Yuba river access, be permanently protected and made available to the public, creating a total of over twelve hundred acres of conserved area stretching from Smartsville to the Yuba River and from Timbuctoo to Mooney Flat Road. Blue Point Mine Due Diligence on Mine-Scarred Lands In California’s ABANDONED MINE FEATURES: There are thousands of abandoned mine lands (AMLs) in California, many of which Gold Country, have both physical and chemical hazards associated with them. public funds Abandoned hydraulic mines and mine features are sources of have been used to mercury-contaminated sediment to downstream watersheds. acquire mining- impacted lands for conservation and LEGACY MINE SITE CHARACTERISTICS MAY INCLUDE: recreation without recognizing • Active Erosional Areas the physical and • Drain Tunnels chemical hazards •
Recommended publications
  • A History of the California Supreme Court in Its First Three Decades, 1850–1879
    BOOK SECTION A HISTORY OF THE CALIFORNIA SUPREME COURT IN ITS FIRST THREE DECADES, 1850–1879 293 A HISTORY OF THE CALIFORNIA SUPREME COURT IN ITS FIRST THREE DECADES, 1850–1879 ARNOLD ROTH* PREFACE he history of the United States has been written not merely in the “T halls of Congress, in the Executive offices, and on the battlefields, but to a great extent in the chambers of the Supreme Court of the United States.”1 It is no exaggeration to say that the Supreme Court of California holds an analogous position in the history of the Golden State. The discovery of gold made California a turbulent and volatile state during the first decades of statehood. The presence of the precious ore transformed an essentially pastoral society into an active commercial and industrial society. Drawn to what was once a relatively tranquil Mexican province was a disparate population from all sections of the United States and from many foreign nations. Helping to create order from veritable chaos was the California Supreme Court. The Court served the dual function of bringing a settled * Ph.D., University of Southern California, 1973 (see Preface for additional information). 1 Charles Warren, The Supreme Court in United States History, vol. I (2 vols.; rev. ed., Boston; Little, Brown, and Company, 1922, 1926), 1. 294 CALIFORNIA LEGAL HISTORY ✯ VOLUME 14, 2019 order of affairs to the state, and also, in a less noticeable role, of providing a sense of continuity with the rest of the nation by bringing the state into the mainstream of American law.
    [Show full text]
  • Western Legal History
    WESTERN LEGAL HISTORY THE JOURNAL OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT HISTORiCAL SOCIETY VOLUME 1, NUMBER 2 SUMMER/FALL 1988 Western Legal History is published semi-annually, in spring and fall, by the Ninth Judicial Circuit Historical Society, P.O. Box 2558, Pasadena, California 91102-2558, (818) 405-7059. The journal explores, analyzes, and presents the history of law, the legal profession, and the courts - particularly the federal courts - in Alaska, Arizona, California, Hawaii, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Oregon, Washington, Guam, and the Northern Mariana Islands. Western Legal History is sent to members of the Society as well as members of affiliated legal historical societies in the Ninth Circuit. Membership is open to all. Membership dues (individuals and institutions): Patron, $1,000 or more; Steward, $750-$999; Sponsor, $500-$749; Grantor, $250-$499; Sustaining, $100-$249; Advocate, $50-$99; Subscribing (non- members of the bench and bar, attorneys in practice fewer than five years, libraries, and academic institutions), $25-$49. Membership dues (law firms and corporations): Founder, $3,000 or more; Patron, $1,000-$2,999; Steward, $750-$999; Sponsor, $500-$749; Grantor, $250-$499. For information regarding membership, back issues of Western Legal History, and other Society publications and programs, please write or telephone. POSTMASTER: Please send change of address to: Western Legal History P.O. Box 2558 Pasadena, California 91102-2558. Western Legal History disclaims responsibility for statements made by authors and for accuracy of footnotes. Copyright 1988 by the Ninth Judicial Circuit Historical Society. ISSN 0896-2189. The Editorial Board welcomes unsolicited manuscripts, books for review, reports on research in progress, and recommendations for the journal.
    [Show full text]
  • F. W. HOWAY. Twenty Years of York Factory, 1694-1714: Leremie's Account of Hudson Strait and Bay. Translated from the French
    70 Book Reviews David Thompson on the stretch of the Columbia River from Blae­ berry Creek to the Boat Encampment. For many years it has been quite unobtainable. Very rarely did it appear in the old book catalogues. Students are indebted to the enterprise of Mr. Douglas of the Geographic Board of Canada for its reissue. It is to be regretted that of the four cuts only one has been repro­ duced. The pagination of the original edition has been preserved through about three-quarters of the volume. Mr. Moberley died in the city of Vancouver, British Columbia, in May, 1915. F. W. HOWAY. Way Sketches, Containing Incidents of Travel Across the Plains. By LORENZO SAWYER. With Historical Notes Compiled from Rare Sources and an Introduction by Edward Eberstadt. (New York: Edward Eberstadt, 1926. Pp. 125. $5.00.) The publication in book form of Lorenzo Sawyer's Way Sketches is a welcome addition to the literature of the West. The position and importance of this narrative is indicated by the following annotation drawn from Mr. H. R. Wagner's The Plains and the Rockies, page 96: "These sketches appeared in the Family Visitor of Cleveland, probably copied from the Ohio Statesman, during the fall of 1850 and the wintel of 1850-51. They were written by Lorenzo Sawyer, afterward Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of California, in the form of a day by day journal and form one of the most readable of all the overland narratives of gold rush days that I have read." The journal covers a trip from St.
    [Show full text]
  • The Truth Behind California's Gold Rush
    A Golden Myth: The Truth Behind California's Gold Rush Eric Rapps McGill University 2 The California Gold Rush of 1848 was one of the most transformational events in American history. In terms of America’s demographics, California became one of the most attractive destinations for Chinese, French, and Latin American immigrants, in addition to the 250,000 American migrants who moved there in search of gold.1 The abundance of gold in California and the economic contribution that gold mining made to the American economy in the second half of the nineteenth century were the main reasons why California earned statehood after only three years as a territory.2 From a social history perspective, Californians developed an identity based on materialism because their sole motivation for moving out west had been to get rich off of gold—the ultimate symbol of wealth.3 However, popular romanticism of the Gold Rush overlooks the environmental impacts of the event. Not only did the hydraulic mining associated with the Gold Rush destroy some of California’s most important water sources, but the mining and dredging that went along with it led to the deforestation of significant portions of California’s landscape as well. While it seemed that America’s major corporations at the time were willing to sacrifice the environment for financial gain, the Southern Pacific Transportation Company played an important role in promoting environmental regulations. It was largely thanks to their activism that the federal government adopted legislation to preserve sites like Yosemite, Sequoia, and the Sierra National Forest, which successfully prevented mining companies from further damaging California’s landscape.
    [Show full text]
  • NMFS 2014 Biological Opinion for Daguerre Point
    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE West Coast Region 650 Capitol Mall, Suite 5-1 00 Sacramento, California 9581 4-4 700 In response refer to: MAY 1 2 2014 WCR-2013-1 Michael J. Farrell Colonel, U.S. Army Commander U.S. Army Engineer District, Sacramento 1325 J Street Sacramento, California 95814-2922 Dear Colonel Farrell: This document transmits NOAA's National Marine Fisheries Service's (NMFS) biological opinion (Enclosure) for the U.S. Army Corps ofEngineers' (Corps) operation and maintenance ofDaguerre Point Dam on the Yuba River. The biological opinion reviews the effects of the action on federally listed threatened Central Valley spring-run Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha), threatened California Central Valley steelhead (0. myldss), the threatened Southern distinct population segment of green sturgeon (Acipenser medirostris), and their designated critical habitat in accordance with section 7(a)(2) of the Endangered Species Act (ESA) of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). On August 13, 2013, the U.S. District Court, Eastern District of California, ordered NMFS to file a new biological opinion by May 12, 2014. Your request for reinitiation of formal consultation, which included the final biological assessment, was received on October 22, 2013. The proposed action is the Corps' continued operation and maintenance ofDaguerre Point Dam on the lower Yuba River. Operation and maintenance at Daguerre Point Dam includes operation of the fish ladders (flow gates, baffle boards, debris removal), sediment management, flashboard management, a river stage gage, a contract for operation of fish counting system in the fish ladders and a contract for the installation of flashboards on the dam.
    [Show full text]
  • Deep Storage of Contaminated Hydraulic Mining Sediment Along the Lower Yuba River, California
    Nakamura, TK, et al. 2018. Remains of the 19th Century: Deep storage of contaminated hydraulic mining sediment along the Lower Yuba River, California. Elem Sci Anth, 6: 70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.333 RESEARCH ARTICLE Remains of the 19th Century: Deep storage of contaminated hydraulic mining sediment along the Lower Yuba River, California Tyler K. Nakamura*, Michael Bliss Singer†,‡ and Emmanuel J. Gabet* Since the onset of hydraulic gold mining in California’s Sierra Nevada foothills in 1852, the environmental damage caused by displacement and storage of hydraulic mining sediment (HMS) has been a significant ecological problem downstream. Large volumes of mercury-laden HMS from the Yuba River watershed were deposited within the river corridor, creating the anthropogenic Yuba Fan. However, there are outstanding uncertainties about how much HMS is still contained within this fan. To quantify the deep storage of HMS in the Yuba Fan, we analyzed mercury concentrations of sediment samples collected from borings and outcrops at multiple depths. The mercury concentrations served as chemostratigraphic markers to identify the contacts between the HMS and underlying pre-mining deposits. The HMS had mercury con- centrations at least ten-fold higher than pre-mining deposits. Analysis of the lower Yuba Fan’s volume suggests that approximately 8.1 × 107 m3 of HMS was deposited within the study area between 1852 and 1999, representing ~32% of the original Yuba Fan delivered by 19th Century hydraulic gold mining. Our estimate of the mercury mass contained within this region is 6.7 × 103 kg, which is several orders of magnitude smaller than what was estimated to have been lost to the mining process.
    [Show full text]
  • Western Legal History
    WESTERN LEGAL HISTORY THE JOURNAL OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT HISTORICAL SOCIETY VOLUME 2, NUMBER 2 SUMMER/FALL 1989 Western Legal History is published semi-annually, in spring and fall, by the Ninth judicial Circuit Historical Society, 620 S. W Main Street, Room 703, Portland, Oregon 97205, (503) 326-3458. The journal explores, analyzes, and presents the history of law, the legal profession, and the courts - particularly the federal courts - in Alaska, Arizona, California, Hawaii, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Oregon, Washington, Guam, and the Northern Mariana Islands. Western Legal History is sent to members of the Society as well as members of affiliated legal historical societies in the Ninth Circuit. Membership is open to all. Membership dues (individuals and institutions): Patron, $1,000 or more; Steward, $750-$999; Sponsor, $500-749; Grantor, $250-$499; Sustaining, $100-$249; Advocate, $50-$99; Subscribing (non- members of the bench and bar, attorneys in practice fewer than five years, libraries, and academic institutions), $25-$49. Membership dues (law firms and corporations): Founder $3,000 or more; Patron $1,000-$2,999: Steward, $750-$999; Sponsor, $500-$749; Grantor, $250-$499. For information regarding membership, back issues of Western Legal History, and other Society publications and programs, please write or telephone. POSTMASTER: Please send change of address to: Editor Western Legal History 620 S. W. Main Street Room 703 Portland, Oregon 97205 Western Legal History disclaims responsibility for statements made by authors and for accuracy of footnotes. Copyright by the Ninth Judicial Circuit Historical Society. ISSN 0896-2189. The Editorial Board welcomes unsolicited manuscripts, books for review, reports on research in progress, and recommendations for the journal.
    [Show full text]
  • 38 October 5, 2004 E-Mail from Sarah Williams to Sara Cacabelos 39 April
    38 October 5, 2004 E-mail from Sarah Williams to Sara Cacabelos 39 April 29, 2008 letter from Sarah Williams to the Mariposa Department of Public Works 40 Hansen v. Bd. ojSupervisors (1996) 12 Cal.4th 553 41 March 11, 2010 Findings forWestem Aggregates,LLCVested Rights Determination, pp. 11-15 42 Historic photographs at the Mine site 43 State Mining and Geology Board Executiye Officer's Report for Meeting Date ofFebruaryJ4, 2008 1099972,,5 For Meeting Date: March 11, 2010 Agenda Item No.4: Adoption of State Mining and Geology Board's Final Decision on Vested Rights Pertaining to Western Aggregates, LLC (CA Mine ID #91·58·0001), Kerry Shapiro (Agent), Western Aggregates, LLC (Operator), Yuba County. INTRODUCTION: The State Mining and Geology Board (SMGB) is the lead agency pursuant to the Surface Mining and Reclamation Act (SMARA) for the County of Yuba. On August 6, 2009, the SMGB commenced the special public hearing to determine whether Western Aggregates, LLC. (Western) had vested rights for 4,125 acres, which included its current surface mining operations, located in the Yuba Goldfields. At its public hearing held on September 11, 2009, the SMGB accepted the findings set forth by the California Geological Survey (CGS), and determined that a preponderance of evidence existed that demonstrated Western has vested rights for all Sections with exception to Sections 25 and 30, and the southwest corner of Section 34. The SMGB at its February 11, 2010, regular business meeting considered limitations in terms of annual production associated with this determination of vested rights, and determined that no limitations or restrictions on annual production would be imposed.
    [Show full text]
  • Yick Wo at 125: Four Simple Lessons for the Contemporary Supreme Court
    Michigan Journal of Race and Law Volume 17 2012 Yick Wo at 125: Four Simple Lessons for the Contemporary Supreme Court Marie A. Failinger Hamline University School of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mjrl Part of the Civil Rights and Discrimination Commons, Courts Commons, Law and Race Commons, Legal History Commons, and the Supreme Court of the United States Commons Recommended Citation Marie A. Failinger, Yick Wo at 125: Four Simple Lessons for the Contemporary Supreme Court, 17 MICH. J. RACE & L. 217 (2012). Available at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mjrl/vol17/iss2/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Michigan Journal of Race and Law by an authorized editor of University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. YICKWOAT 125: FOUR SIMPLE LESSONS FOR THE CONTEMPORARY SUPREME COURT Marie A. Failinger* The 125th anniversary of Yick Wo v. Hopkins is an important opportunity to recognize the pervasive role of law in oppressive treatment of Chinese immigrants in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. It is also a good opportunity for the Supreme Court to reflect onfour important lessons gleaned from Yick Wo. First, the Court should never lend justification to the evil of class discrimination, even if it has to decline to rule in a case. Second, where there is persistent discrimination against a minority group, the Court must be similarly persistent in fighting it.
    [Show full text]
  • Yuba Goldfields Fish Barrier Project Preliminary
    YUBA GOLDFIELDS FISH BARRIER PROJECT PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING REPORT YUBA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES CENTRAL DISTRICT NOVEMBER 1999 YUBA GOLDFIELDS FISH BARRIER PROJECT PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING REPORT YUBA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES CENTRAL DISTRICT NOVEMBER 1999 Contents Page Number Organization .................................................................................................................. iv Project Background......................................................................................................... 1 Hydrology....................................................................................................................... 2 Yuba River Flows ........................................................................................................... 4 Design Objectives ........................................................................................................... 6 Design Alternatives......................................................................................................... 7 Design Description........................................................................................................ 10 Final Design.................................................................................................................. 14 Project Cost Estimate .................................................................................................... 15 Environmental Setting..................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Remediation Options for Mercury-Contaminated Sediments Within the Yuba River Watershed Tara Fitzgerald University of San Francisco, [email protected]
    The University of San Francisco USF Scholarship: a digital repository @ Gleeson Library | Geschke Center Master's Projects and Capstones Theses, Dissertations, Capstones and Projects Fall 12-12-2014 Remediation options for mercury-contaminated sediments within the Yuba River watershed Tara Fitzgerald University of San Francisco, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.usfca.edu/capstone Part of the Water Resource Management Commons Recommended Citation Fitzgerald, Tara, "Remediation options for mercury-contaminated sediments within the Yuba River watershed" (2014). Master's Projects and Capstones. 107. https://repository.usfca.edu/capstone/107 This Project/Capstone is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, Capstones and Projects at USF Scholarship: a digital repository @ Gleeson Library | Geschke Center. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Projects and Capstones by an authorized administrator of USF Scholarship: a digital repository @ Gleeson Library | Geschke Center. For more information, please contact [email protected]. This Master's Project Remediation Options For Mercury-Contaminated Sediments Throughout the Yuba River Watershed by Tara Fitzgerald is submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of: Master of Science in Environmental Management at the University of San Francisco Submitted: Received: ...................................……….. ................................…………. Tara Fitzgerald 12-07-14 Maggie Winslow, Ph.D. 12-07-14
    [Show full text]
  • Mineral Land Classification: Concrete Aggregate in the Greater Sacramento Area Production-Consumption Region
    Special Report 245 MINERAL LAND CLASSIFICATION: CONCRETE AGGREGATE IN THE GREATER SACRAMENTO AREA PRODUCTION-CONSUMPTION REGION 2018 STATE OF CALIFORNIA EDMUND G. BROWN JR. GOVERNOR THE NATURAL RESOURCES DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION AGENCY DAVID BUNN JOHN LAIRD DIRECTOR SECRETARY FOR RESOURCES CALIFORNIA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WILLIAM R. SHORT, ACTING STATE GEOLOGIST Copyright © 2018 by the California Department of Conservation, California Geological Survey. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced without written consent of the California Geological Survey. “The Department of Conservation makes no warranties as to the suitability of this product for any particular purpose. SPECIAL REPORT 245 MINERAL LAND CLASSIFICATION: CONCRETE AGGREGATE IN THE GREATER SACRAMENTO AREA PRODUCTION-CONSUMPTION REGION By Matt D. O’Neal and Fred W. Gius (PG 7788) 2018 CALIFORNIA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY’S PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICES: Southern California Regional Office Library and Headquarters Office Bay Area Regional Office 320 West 4th Street, Suite 850 801 K Street, MS 14-31 1900 S. Norfolk St., Suite 300 Los Angeles, CA 90013 Sacramento, CA 95814-3531 San Mateo, CA 94403 (213) 239-0878 (916) 445-5716 (650) 350-7301 Table of Contents INDEX OF ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ........................................................................ v EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................................... vii PART I – INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]