DOCSLIB.ORG

Recommendations for Implementing Bus Rapid Transit in Pittsburgh's

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Recommendations for Implementing Bus Rapid Transit in Pittsburgh's Recommendations for Implementing Bus Rapid Transit in Pittsburgh’s Oakland-Uptown-Downtown Transit Corridor Systems Synthesis Project Final Report Spring Semester, January - May 2011 May 6, 2011 Prepared for: Port Authority of Allegheny County Prepared by: Shenshen Cao Yang Hu Wenjuan Jiang Paul Karam Cristina Melo Carlos Patino Timothy Seidel Yunyue Wu Project Team Advisor Christopher Paul, PhD, RAND Team Leaders Paul Karam Timothy Seidel Board Relations Yunyue Wu Project Team Shenshen Cao Yang Hu Wenjuan Jiang Cristina Melo Carlos Patino i Advisory Board Port Authority of Allegheny County Steve Bland, CEO Wendy Stern, Assistant General Manager David Wohlwill, Manager of Extended Range Planning Center for Economic Development at Heinz College Greg Lagana, Director of Projects Members at Large Lucinda Beattie, V.P. Transportation, Pittsburgh Downtown Partnership Scott Bricker, Bike Pittsburgh Andrew Dash, Senior Planner, Department of City Planning Richard Feder, Consultant, Trans Associates Court Gould, Sustainable Pittsburgh Tom Halloran, Director, Community & Legislative Relations Center, Urban Redevelopment Authority Lynn Heckman, Assistant Director-Transportation Initiatives, Allegheny County Economic Development Christopher Hendrickson, Civil Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University Tom Klevan, Southwestern Pennsylvania Commission Darryl C. Phillips, Lead Traffic Engineer, Parsons Brinckerhoff Mavis Rainey, Executive Director, Oakland Transportation Management Association Patrick Roberts, Principal Transportation Planner, Department of City Planning Chris Sandvig, Pittsburgh Community Reinvestment Group Rick Stafford, Traffic 21, Carnegie Mellon University Wanda Wilson, Oakland Planning and Development Corporation iii Table of Contents Table of Figures ............................................................................................................................. xi Index of Tables ............................................................................................................................. xiii Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................... xv List of Acronyms.......................................................................................................................... xxi 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 1 2. Issue Identification and Prioritization ..................................................................................... 2 2.1. Issues Identified................................................................................................................ 2 2.2. Ranking Criteria ............................................................................................................... 4 2.3. Prioritization Matrix ......................................................................................................... 4 2.4. Analysis and Results ........................................................................................................ 5 2.4.1. Averaging .................................................................................................................. 5 2.4.2. Frequencies of Highest Rated Issues ........................................................................ 5 2.5. Issues for Further Analysis ............................................................................................... 6 3. Cases Reviewed ...................................................................................................................... 7 3.1. Albany, New York ............................................................................................................ 7 3.2. Boston, Massachusetts ..................................................................................................... 7 3.3. Cleveland, Ohio ................................................................................................................ 7 3.4. Eugene, Oregon ................................................................................................................ 8 3.5. Kansas City, Kansas ......................................................................................................... 8 3.6. Honolulu, Hawaii ............................................................................................................. 8 3.7. Los Angeles, California .................................................................................................... 8 3.8. Oakland, California .......................................................................................................... 9 3.9. Ottawa, Ontario ................................................................................................................ 9 3.10. Orlando, Florida............................................................................................................ 9 4. Financing Alternatives ...........................................................................................................11 4.1. Introduction .....................................................................................................................11 4.2. Funding Alternatives ...................................................................................................... 14 4.2.1. Federal Funding Sources......................................................................................... 14 4.2.2. Private Funding Sources ......................................................................................... 16 4.3. Case Studies ................................................................................................................... 17 4.3.1. Eugene, Oregon....................................................................................................... 17 4.3.2. Cleveland, Ohio ...................................................................................................... 19 v 4.3.3. Kansas City, Kansas ................................................................................................ 22 4.3.4. Albany, New York ................................................................................................... 23 4.4. Findings and Recommendations .................................................................................... 25 5. Investment Opportunities and Economic Development along the BRT Corridor ................ 27 5.1. Introduction .................................................................................................................... 27 5.2. Case Studies ................................................................................................................... 27 5.2.1. Overview ................................................................................................................. 27 5.2.2. Cleveland, Ohio ...................................................................................................... 28 5.2.3. Boston, Massachusetts ............................................................................................ 30 5.2.4. Ottawa, Ontario ....................................................................................................... 32 5.3. Transit Revitalization Investment Districts (TRID) ....................................................... 33 5.3.1. Overview of TRID .................................................................................................. 33 5.3.2. South Hills Transit Revitalization Investment District Planning Study.................. 34 5.4. Potential Investment Resources ..................................................................................... 34 5.4.1. Urban Redevelopment Authority of Pittsburgh (URA) .......................................... 34 5.5. Potential Investment Strategies by Neighborhood ......................................................... 39 5.5.1. Oakland ................................................................................................................... 39 5.5.2. Uptown .................................................................................................................... 41 5.5.3. Downtown ............................................................................................................... 44 5.5.4. Other Potential Investments Groups ....................................................................... 46 6. Stop Selection ....................................................................................................................... 47 6.1. Introduction .................................................................................................................... 47 6.2. Literature Review ........................................................................................................... 47 6.2.1. Corridor Selection Criteria from Bus Rapid Transit Planning Guide ..................... 47 6.2.2. Stop Selection Criteria from Recommended Practices for BRT Services Design .. 48 6.3. Stop Selection Process ................................................................................................... 50 6.3.1. Selecting Fifth Avenue over Forbes Avenue ........................................................... 50 6.3.2. Proposed BRT Route ............................................................................................... 50 6.3.3. Main Criteria Evaluated to Select Stops ................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Pittsburgh Interchanges
    I - 376 Corridor New Exit Numbers Pittsburgh Interchanges I-376 Exit Name County Old Route Old Exit New Route New I-376 Exit Route # Status Youngstown Mercer PA 60 I-376 1A I-80 West Approved Mercer Mercer PA 60 I-376 1B I-80 East Approved Mercer/West Middlesex (Eastbound) Mercer PA 60 I-376 1C PA 318 Approved West Middlesex Mercer PA 60 I-376 2PA 18Approved New Wilmington/Pulaski Lawrence PA 60 25 I-376 5 PA 208 Approved Mitchell Road Lawrence PA 60 24 I-376 9 To PA 18 Approved Youngstown/Sampson St. (Westbound) Lawrence PA 60 I-376 12 US 422 West/Business 422 East Approved Youngstown (Eastbound) Lawrence PA 60 I-376 12A To US 422 West Approved Sampson Street (Eastbound) Lawrence PA 60 I-376 12B Business US 422 East Approved State Street/Poland, Ohio Lawrence PA 60 I-376 13 US 224 Approved Butler Lawrence PA 60 45 I-376 15 US 422 East Approved Mt. Jackson Lawrence Toll 60 43 Toll 376 17 PA 108 Approved Moravia Lawrence Toll 60 40 Toll 376 20 PA 168 Approved PA Turnpike Harrisburg/Ohio Beaver Toll 60 33 Toll 376 26 I-76/PA Turnpike Approved Beaver Falls Beaver Toll 60 31 Toll 376 29 PA 551/To PA 18 Approved Chippewa Beaver PA 60 15 I-376 31 PA 51 Approved Brighton Beaver PA 60 14 I-376 36 Approved Beaver/Midland (Eastbound) Beaver PA 60 13 I-376 38 PA 68 Approved Midland (Westbound) Beaver PA 60 13-B I-376 38-A PA 68 West Approved Beaver (Westbound) Beaver PA 60 13-A I-376 38-B PA 68 East Approved Monaca/Shippingport Beaver PA 60 12 I-376 39 PA 18 Approved Center Beaver PA 60 11 I-376 42 Approved Aliquippa Beaver PA 60 10 I-376 45 Approved
    [Show full text]
  • BRTOD – State of the Practice in the United States
    BRTOD – State of the Practice in the United States By: Andrew Degerstrom September 2018 Contents Introduction .............................................................................................1 Purpose of this Report .............................................................................1 Economic Development and Transit-Oriented Development ...................2 Definition of Bus Rapid Transit .................................................................2 Literature Review ..................................................................................3 BRT Economic Development Outcomes ...................................................3 Factors that Affect the Success of BRTOD Implementation .....................5 Case Studies ...........................................................................................7 Cleveland HealthLine ................................................................................7 Pittsburgh Martin Luther King, Jr. East Busway East Liberty Station ..... 11 Pittsburgh Uptown-Oakland BRT and the EcoInnovation District .......... 16 BRTOD at home, the rapid bus A Line and the METRO Gold Line .........20 Conclusion .............................................................................................23 References .............................................................................................24 Artist rendering of Pittsburgh's East Liberty neighborhood and the Martin Luther King, Jr. East Busway Introduction Purpose of this Report If Light Rail Transit (LRT)
    [Show full text]
  • Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) What Is the MUTCD?
    National Committee on Uniform Traffic Control Devices Bus/BRT Applications Introduction • I am Steve Andrle from TRB standing in for Randy McCourt, DKS Associates and 2019 ITE International Vice President • I co-manage with Claire Randall15 TRB public transit standing committees. • I want to bring you up to date on planned bus- oriented improvements to the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) What is the MUTCD? • Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) – Standards for roadway signs, signals, and markings • Authorized in 23 CFR, Part 655: It is an FHWA document. • National Committee on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (NCUTCD) develops content • Sponsored by 19 organizations including ITE, AASHTO, APTA and ATSSA (American Traffic Safety Services Association) Background • Bus rapid transit, busways, and other bus applications have expanded greatly since the last edition of the MUTCD in 2009 • The bus-related sections need to be updated • Much of the available research speaks to proposed systems, not actual experience • The NCUTCD felt it was a good time to survey actual systems to see what has worked, what didn’t work, and to identify gaps. National Survey • The NCUTCD established a task force with APTA and FTA • Working together they issued a survey in April of 2018. I am sure some of you received it. • The results will be released to the NCUTCD on June 20 – effectively now • I cannot give you any details until the NCUTCD releases the findings Survey Questions • Have you participated in design and/or operations of
    [Show full text]
  • Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority
    Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority Joe Calabrese - General Manager RTA Ridership by Mode ! 500 Buses - 75 % ! 60 Heavy Rail Vehicles - 10% ! 24 RTV’s (BRT) - 8% ! 48 Light Rail Vehicles - 6% ! Paratransit - 100 vehicles - 1% RTA Fleet GCRTA HealthLine Euclid Avenue Transformation Euclid Avenue History Euclid Avenue History Alternatives Analysis - late 1990’s ! Subway ! Light Rail ! Do Nothing (keep the #6 bus) ! Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Mode Selection Criteria ! Capacity (30,000 + daily customers) ! Connectivity ! Funding possibilities (FTA) ! Cost - capital and operating ! Economic development potential " Renew Aging Infrastructure Vision for the “Silver Line” BRT ! “Rail Like” Image ! Fast ! Simple ! Safe ! First Class ! Help Revitalize Corridor Euclid Corridor Project ! 9.38 miles long ! 36 stations (from 100 bus stops) ! Travel time from 40 to 28 minutes ! Building face to building face ! Pedestrian and bicycle friendly ! Landscape/hardscape treatment ! Pubic Art - Integrated/stand-alone Exclusive Right of Way Funding Pie Charts FTA 80% ODOT 20% 2000 ODOT FTA 25% 50% City MPO RTA 2004 Ground Breaking October 2004 “Silver Line” Construction “Silver Line” Construction (3.5 years) “Silver Line” Construction “Silver Line” Construction “Silver Line” Construction “Rail Like” Image ! Reduced Travel Time " Multi-Door Boarding " Exclusive Right-of-Way " Traffic Signal Prioritization " Higher Travel Speeds " Level Boarding " Precision Docking " Rear Facing Wheel Chair Restraints " Off-Board Fare Collection “Rail Like” Image ! Hi-Frequency
    [Show full text]
  • 2 Mount Royal
    2 MOUNT ROYAL P13 MOUNT ROYAL FLYER SERVICE NOTES MONDAY THROUGH FRIDAY SERVICE MONDAY To Millvale - Etna - Shaler - Hampton - Route P13 does not operate on Saturdays, To Downtown Pittsburgh THROUGH McCandless Sundays, New Year's Day, Memorial Day, FRIDAY Independence Day, Labor Day, Thanksgiving SERVICE or Christmas. To Downtown Pittsburgh North Hills Village Target Ross Rd McKnight past Ross Park Mall Dr Ross Park Mall (at shelter) Hampton Ferguson Rd at Blvd Royal Mt at Etna Butler St opp. Freeport St Millvale North Ave at Grant Ave East Deutschtown E Ohio St past ChestnutSt Downtown St 9th at Penn Ave Downtown St 9th at Penn Ave East Deutschtown E Ohio St St Heinz at Millvale North Ave at Lincoln Ave Etna Butler St at Freeport St Hampton Ferguson Rd past Mt Royal Blvd Ross Rd McKnight opp. Ross Park Mall Dr Ross Park Mall (at shelter) Ross Rd McKnight at North Hills Village North Hills Village Target 3:53 4:00 .... 4:15 4:27 4:37 4:44 4:50 4:50 4:58 5:06 5:14 5:25 5:38 .... 5:41 5:44 4:18 4:24 .... 4:40 4:53 5:04 5:13 5:20 5:20 5:28 5:36 5:44 5:55 6:08 .... 6:11 6:14 4:48 4:54 .... 5:10 5:23 5:34 5:43 5:50 5:50 5:58 6:06 6:14 6:25 6:38 .... 6:45 6:48 5:05 5:12 .... 5:27 5:41 5:52 6:03 6:10 6:10 6:19 6:29 6:37 6:50 ...
    [Show full text]
  • National City Branches to Be Divested
    Attachment A National City Branches to Be Divested Branch Name Address City State Zip County Deposits as of June 30, 2008 WOOs) South Hills Village 1825 Washington RD Pittsburgh PA 15241 Allegheny $216,481 Pleasant Hills 10 Old Clairton Rd Pittsburgh PA 15236 Allegheny $164,980 Squirrel Hill, 1730 Murray Ave. Pittsburgh PA 15217 Allegheny $136,946 Murray Ave Monroeville Mall 711 Monroeville Mall Monroeville PA 15146 Allegheny $127,86<1 1/ North Hills 6203 Babcock Pittsburgh PA 15237 Allegheny $91,47c Boulevard Elizabeth 810 McKeesport Rd Elizabeth PA 15037 Allegheny $82,87= Bellevue 484 Lincoln Avenue Pittsburgh PA 15202 Allegheny $79,11" Natrona Heights 1509 Freeport Road Natrona Heights PA 15065 Allegheny $78,42 Mckees Rocks 527 Chartiers Avenue McKees Rocks PA 15136 Allegheny $78,095 Hillcrest 4996 Library Road Bethel Park PA 15102 Allegheny $77,984 Waterworks II 831 FreeDortRoad Pittsburgh PA 15238 Allegheny $73,040 mperial 100 W. Allegheny Rd Imperial PA .15126 Allegheny $71,279 £ngomar 9605 Harmonv Dr Ingomar PA 15127 Allegheny $70,953 Oliver Avenue 300 Sixth Avenue Bldg Pittsburgh PA 15222 Allegheny $58,583 Smithfield Street 445 Smithfield Street Pittsburgh PA 15222 Allegheny $58,00" IAllisonPark 2412 Ferguson Road Allison Park PA 15101 Allegheny $56,01 lLebanon Shops 305 Mt. Lebanon Blvd. Pittsburgh PA 15234 Allegheny $54,95<1 Mcknight Road 4808 McKnight Road Pittsburgh PA 15237 Allegheny $53,74( llegheny 2/ 1020 Western Avenue Pittsburgh PA 15233 Allegheny $53,411 East Mckeesport 1135 Fifth Avenue East McKeesDort PA 15035 Allegheny
    [Show full text]
  • BUS STATIONS AS TOD ANCHORS REPORT Prepared in Accordance with California Senate Bill 961, 2017-2018 Regular Session
    Housing Financing Tools and Equitable, Location-Efficient Development in California BUS STATIONS AS TOD ANCHORS REPORT Prepared in Accordance with California Senate Bill 961, 2017-2018 Regular Session Prepared for: Governor's Office of Planning and Research December 29, 2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................... 1 I. INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................... 5 Report Purpose ....................................................................................................................... 5 Report Organization ................................................................................................................ 5 II. BACKGROUND ON THE SECOND NEIGHBORHOOD INFILL FINANCE AND TRANSIT IMPROVEMENTS ACT ................................................................................................................ 7 Definition of Bus Transit ......................................................................................................... 7 Extent of Use ........................................................................................................................... 7 III. LITERATURE REVIEW ............................................................................................................ 9 Literature Overview ................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Discover the Ideal Location on Pittsburgh's North Shore
    For Lease: Discover the Ideal Location $21.95 PSF Full Service on Pittsburgh’s North Shore 503 MARTINDALE STREET PITTSBURGH, PA 15212 Available Space 7th Floor: 1,800 SF+ 5th Floor: 5,345 SF+ & 3,243 SF+ 3rd Floor: 34,814 SF+ (Full Floor) 2nd Floor: 7,180 SF+ Subdividable 3,425 SF+ & 3,755 SF+ 7th Floor: 1,800 SF+ Prime Location 5th Floor: 5,345 SF+ 3,243 SF+ Located on Martindale Street between PNC Park and Heinz field, the D. L. Clark Building is just steps away from many new restaurants, nighttime activities, 3rd Floor: and ongoing North Shore Full Floor: 34,814 SF+ projects and redevelopments. The D.L. Clark Building has 2nd Floor: excellent access to downtown 7,180 SF+ (Subdividable) Pittsburgh and all major arteries. Building Specifics Historic Building on the North Shore Building Size: 197,000 SF+ Six Floors: 32,540 SF+ to 34,084 SF each with a 5,000 SF+ Penthouse Great views of Pittsburgh, the North Shore & North Side and Allegheny Commons Park 2,000 Parking Spaces Available Surrounding the Building at Monthly Rates Attractive Interiors Fire Protection: Security guards provide tenants’ employees with escort Building Specifications The Building is completely protected by modern fire suppression, service to the designated parking areas upon request. The emergency lighting and fire alarm systems. Building is 100% building has twenty-nine (29) security cameras mounted sprinklered by an overhead wet system. for viewing at the guard’s desk. The elevators have a key- lock system after 6 p.m. The D. L. Clark Office Building offers the finest quality equipment and state-of-the-art building Windows: Amenities: systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Toolbox: BRT Person Throughput-Vehicle Congestion Tradeoffs
    Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Toolbox: BRT Person Throughput-Vehicle Congestion Tradeoffs Jingquan Li, Jacob Tsao, Ching-yao Chan, Kun Zhou, and Wei-Bin Zhang UCB-ITS-PRR-2015-02 California PATH University of California Berkeley March 11, 2015 Page 1 of 54 ADA Notice Individuals with sensory disabilities, this document is available in alternative formats. For information call (916) 654-6410, or TDD (916) 654-3880 or write STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Records and forms Management, 1120 N Street, MS- 89, Sacramento, CA 95814 TECHNICAL REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE TR0003 (REV. 10/98) 1. REPORT NUMBER 2. GOVERNMENT ASSOCIATION NUMBER 3. RECIPIENT’S CATALOG NUMBER CA 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE 5. REPORT DATE December 2014 Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Toolbox: BRT Person Throughput- 6. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE Vehicle Congestion Tradeoffs 7. AUTHOR(S) 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NO. Jingquan Li, Jacob Tsao, Ching-yao Chan, Kun Zhou, UCB-ITS-PRR-2015-02 and Wei-Bin Zhang 9. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS 10. WORK UNIT NUMBER California PATH Program, University of California at Berkeley 1357 46th St., Richmond, CA 94804 11. CONTRACT OR GRANT NUMBER Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California at Irvine 4000 Anteater Instruction and Research Bldg., Irvine, CA 92697 12. SPONSORING AGENCY AND ADDRESS 13. TYPE OF REPORT AND PERIOD COVERED California Department of Transportation Division of Research and Innovation 14. SPONSORING AGENCY CODE P.O. Box 942873, MS 83 Sacramento, CA 94273-0001 15. SUPPLEMENTAL NOTES 16. ABSTRACT This report documents a research effort to understand the current practice and issues associated with Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) planning and deployment.
    [Show full text]
  • Llght Rall Translt Statlon Deslgn Guldellnes
    PORT AUTHORITY OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT V.4.0 7/20/18 STATION DESIGN GUIDELINES ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Port Authority of Allegheny County (PAAC) provides public transportation throughout Pittsburgh and Allegheny County. The Authority’s 2,600 employees operate, maintain, and support bus, light rail, incline, and paratransit services for approximately 200,000 daily riders. Port Authority is currently focused on enacting several improvements to make service more efficient and easier to use. Numerous projects are either underway or in the planning stages, including implementation of smart card technology, real-time vehicle tracking, and on-street bus rapid transit. Port Authority is governed by an 11-member Board of Directors – unpaid volunteers who are appointed by the Allegheny County Executive, leaders from both parties in the Pennsylvania House of Representatives and Senate, and the Governor of Pennsylvania. The Board holds monthly public meetings. Port Authority’s budget is funded by fare and advertising revenue, along with money from county, state, and federal sources. The Authority’s finances and operations are audited on a regular basis, both internally and by external agencies. Port Authority began serving the community in March 1964. The Authority was created in 1959 when the Pennsylvania Legislature authorized the consolidation of 33 private transit carriers, many of which were failing financially. The consolidation included the Pittsburgh Railways Company, along with 32 independent bus and inclined plane companies. By combining fare structures and centralizing operations, Port Authority established the first unified transit system in Allegheny County. Participants Port Authority of Allegheny County would like to thank agency partners for supporting the Light Rail Transportation Station Guidelines, as well as those who participated by dedicating their time and expertise.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 State of Downtown Pittsburgh
    20 STATE OF DOWNTOWN PITTSBURGH19 TABLE OF CONTENTS For the past eight years, the Pittsburgh Downtown Partnership has been pleased to produce the State of Downtown Pittsburgh Report. This annual compilation and data analysis allows us to benchmark our progress, both year over year and in comparison to peer cities. In this year’s report, several significant trends came to light helping us identify unmet needs and better understand opportunities for developing programs and initiatives in direct response to those challenges. Although improvements to the built environment are evident in nearly every corridor of the Golden Triangle, significant resources are also being channeled into office property interiors to meet the demands of 21st century companies and attract a talented workforce to Pittsburgh’s urban core. More than $300M has been invested in Downtown’s commercial office stock over the 4 ACCOLADES AND BY THE NUMBERS last five years – a successful strategy drawing new tenants to Downtown and ensuring that our iconic buildings will continue to accommodate expanding businesses and emerging start-ups. OFFICE, EMPLOYMENT AND EDUCATION Downtown experienced a 31% growth in residential population over the last ten years, a trend that will continue with the opening 6 of hundreds of new units over the next couple of years. Businesses, from small boutiques to Fortune 500 companies, continued to invest in the Golden Triangle in 2018 while Downtown welcomed a record number of visitors and new residents. HOUSING AND POPULATION 12 Development in Downtown is evolving and all of these investments combine to drive the economic vitality of the city, making Downtown’s thriving renaissance even more robust.
    [Show full text]
  • Neighborhood Parks Shelter Guide
    Neighborhood Parks Shelter Guide Banksville Park $225.00 / $150.00 (without alcohol) Indoor heated facility/ Portable toilets/ Equipped kitchen/ Access to playground and ball field. Capacity: 70 people Location: Crane Ave. and Carnahan Rd. Open: Year round Please Note: playgrounds, swimming pools, fields, etc. are not exclusively reserved for the permit holder unless indicated otherwise. Brighton Heights Park $150.00 / $75.00 (without alcohol) Open-air shelter/ Portable toilet(s)/ No electric. Capacity: 24 people Location: Brighton Woods Rd. & Weltz Way Open: May thru September Only available weekdays from 1PM-9PM June 8th-August 31st. Please Note: playgrounds, swimming pools, fields, etc. are not exclusively reserved for the permit holder unless indicated otherwise. Brookline Park $150.00 / $75.00 (without alcohol) Open-air shelter/ Portable toilet(s)/ Outdoor grill/ No electric/ Playground and fields available. Capacity: 24 people Location: 1400 Brookline Blvd. Open: May thru September Please Note: playgrounds, swimming pools, fields, etc. are not exclusively reserved for the permit holder unless indicated otherwise. Chartiers Park $115.00 / $40.00 (without alcohol) Open-air shelter/ Portable Toilet(s)/ Access to fields. Capacity: 10 people Location: Chartiers Ave and Eyre Way Open: May thru September Please Note: playgrounds, swimming pools, fields, etc. are not exclusively reserved for the permit holder unless indicated otherwise. McKinley Park $150.00 / $75.00 (without alcohol) Open-air shelter/ Portable toilet(s)/ Outdoor grill/ No electric/ Access to playground, ball field, tennis, and hockey courts available. Capacity: 24 people Location: Bausman St. Open: May thru September Please Note: playgrounds, swimming pools, fields, etc. are not exclusively reserved for the permit holder unless indicated otherwise.
    [Show full text]