Theatre Cultures Within Globalising Empires
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Juan De Mariana's De Monetae Mutatione(1609)
Quantitative Easing Four Centuries Ago: Juan de Mariana’s De monetae mutatione (1609) Wim Decock Introduction Professor Donahue has repeatedly defined himself as a “text-based legal historian,” combining rigorous philological analysis of legal texts with care- ful analysis of the historical context from which these texts emerged. He is also firmly committed to the proposition shared by many legal histori- ans that institutions and legal concepts change over time, rendering his research immune from anachronistic interpretations of historical texts.1 At the same time, Professor Donahue has always seen in the close reading of texts and their contexts an excellent way of improving the dialogue between the past and the present, and, potentially, of offering historical insights to jurists involved in the solution of current issues. Therefore, this contribu- tion will dwell on a particular text by Juan de Mariana (1535–1624), a Jesuit theologian, on monetary debasement (De monetae mutatione), an issue of not merely historical interest. While firmly rooted in a specific historical context that remains different from today’s world, Mariana’s concerns are echoed in today’s economic and political debates about monetary policy which have been raging on both sides of the Atlantic in the wake of the recent sovereign debt crises. 1. E.g. Charles Donahue, “A Crisis of Law? Reflections on the Church and the Law over the Centuries,” The Jurist (2005), 3. 355 356 Wim Decock As a matter of fact, Mariana published this tract on the Spanish gov- ernment’s monetary policy in 1607, just two years after the fourth sovereign default of Spain in five decades. -
Representations of Spain in Early Modern English Drama
Saugata Bhaduri Polycolonial Angst: Representations of Spain in Early Modern English Drama One of the important questions that this conference1 requires us to explore is how Spain was represented in early modern English theatre, and to examine such representation especially against the backdrop of the emergence of these two nations as arguably the most important players in the unfolding game of global imperialism. This is precisely what this article proposes to do: to take up representative English plays of the period belonging to the Anglo-Spanish War (1585–1604) which do mention Spain, analyse what the nature of their treat- ment of Spain is and hypothesise as to what may have been the reasons behind such a treatment.2 Given that England and Spain were at bitter war during these twenty years, and given furthermore that these two nations were the most prominent rivals in the global carving of the colonial pie that had already begun during this period, the commonsensical expectation from such plays, about the way Spain would be represented in them, should be of unambiguous Hispanophobia. There were several contextual reasons to occasion widespread Hispanophobia in the period. While Henry VIII’s marriage to Catherine of Aragon (1509) and its subsequent annulment (1533) had already sufficiently complicated Anglo-Hispanic relations, and their daughter Queen Mary I’s marriage to Philip II of Spain (1554) and his subsequent becoming the King of England and Ireland further aggravated the 1 The conference referred to here is the International Conference on Theatre Cultures within Globalizing Empires: Looking at Early Modern England and Spain, organised by the ERC Project “Early Modern European Drama and the Cultural Net (DramaNet),” at the Freie Universität, Ber- lin, November 15–16, 2012, where the preliminary version of this article was presented. -
Max Weber Programme Annual Report on 201/17
ANNUAL REPORT ACADEMIC YEAR 2016-2017 The Max Weber Programme for Postdoctoral Studies ANNUAL REPORT ACADEMIC YEAR 2016/17 MAX WEBER PROGRAMME FOR POSTDOCTORAL STUDIES European University Institute Badia Fiesolana Via dei Roccettini, 9 50014 San Domenico di Fiesole (FI) – Italy Email: [email protected] www.eui.eu/MaxWeberProgramme PUBLISHED IN ITALY IN NOVEMBER 2017 BY THE EUROPEAN UNIVERSITY INSTITUTE © EUROPEAN UNIVERSITY INSTITUTE, 2017 The European Commission supports the EUI through the European Union budget. This publication reflects the views only of the author(s), and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein. Contents FOREWORD BY RICHARD BELLAMY, DIRECTOR OF THE MAX WEBER PROGRAMME 5 MAX WEBER PROGRAMME IN 2016-2017 STATISTICS 7 1. APPLICATIONS FOR THE 2016-2017 MAX WEBER FELLOWSHIPS 7 2. MAX WEBER FELLOWS: THE 2016-2017 COHORT 9 3. MAX WEBER FELLOWS AND THE JOB MARKET 13 MAX WEBER PROGRAMME ACTIVITIES 14 1. ACADEMIC PRACTICE 14 2. MULTIDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH 19 MAX WEBER PROGRAMME ACTIVITIES FEEDBACK 36 1. EVALUATION SURVEY 36 2. ACADEMIC PRACTICE GROUP REPORTS 40 3. THEMATIC GROUP REPORTS 43 MAX WEBER PROGRAMME ACADEMIC CAREERS OBSERVATORY (ACO) 47 MAX WEBER PROGRAMME STEERING COMMITTEE 48 MAX WEBER PROGRAMME TEAM 48 MAX WEBER FELLOWS 49 MAX WEBER PROGRAMME FOR POSTDOCTORAL STUDIES Foreword his report covers the first year of the Max Weber Programme Tsince moving to its new home in Villa Paola. As the report shows, it also coincided with yet another high number of applications to the Programme, and the largest intake of new Fellows so far. -
Seeing Oursel Es in the Xenoi – Plato's Warning to the Greeks
Akropolis 3 (2019) 129-149 Marina Marren* Seeing Ourseles in the Xenoi – Plato’s Warning to the Greeks Abstract: In this essay about the story of Atlantis in Plato’s Timaeus, we focus on the crucial political message that the Atlantis tale contains. More precisely, we seek to respond to a question that may evade a completely satisfactory answer. The question is: Could Plato’s story of the rise and fall of Atlantis, in the Timaeus, be a warning tale to the Greeks of his own time? In order to root the inves- tigation prompted by this question in solid textual ground, we pay close attention to the framing of the Atlantis tale. In what follows, we analyze the series of substitutions (between mythical, ancient, and historical cities, i.e., Atlantis, Athens, and Sais) that Plato uses as he seeks to bring his readers to a point from which we can assess the politics of ancient Athens – a city that in Plato’s time stands on the brink of repeating the political blunders of the formerly glorious empire of the East. Introduction In the spirit of the tradition that takes Plato’s dialogues to be both works of literary genius and of philosophy, we pay careful attention to Plato’s narrative frames and to his choice of interlocutors in order to tease out the philosoph- ical and political recommendations that Plato has for his ancient readers and that his dialogues offer to us. To that end, in Section II, we focus on providing philosophically pertinent details related to the identity and ambitions of Critias IV who, on our interpretation, is the narrator of the Atlantis story. -
¿Quién Fue Juan De Mariana? En Busca De Un Pensador Político Europeo1
CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by University of Liverpool Repository ¿Quién fue Juan de Mariana? En busca de un pensador político europeo1 Harald E. Braun University of Liverpool ¿Quién fue Juan de Mariana? ¿Cuál es el legado de este jesuita y pensador político europeo? Las respuestas a estas preguntas dependen mayormente de a quién se interpele.2 El jesuita, ya lo sabemos, fue un hombre dotado de gran inteligencia y coraje, y que atrajo considerable polémica. Así pues, no nos puede sorprender que diferentes personas, en diferentes momentos, hayan contestado de diferentes formas. En esta ponencia propondré una respuesta. Voy a hablar de la recepción de Juan de Mariana como pensador político en Europa, fuera de España, cómo se le interpretó, cómo, a menudo, se le confundió y cómo, a veces, se le tergiversó. De la misma manera que el dominico Bartolomé de las Casas, Mariana se convirtió en parte de la leyenda negra.3 Como Las Casas, Mariana se hubiera escandalizado de ver cómo se usaron sus palabras. Hablaré también de lo que pienso que el padre Mariana quería decir y de por qué nosotros, hoy, en Europa, tendríamos que escucharle y tomar muy en serio sus palabras. Empecemos, pues, con la leyenda negra de Juan de Mariana. Examinemos la reputación de Mariana entre sus contemporáneos. Déjenme que les lleve a Londres, Inglaterra. Corre el año de 1 Este es el texto ligeramente enmendado de la conferencia pronunciada en el Congreso Internacional de Filosofía La actualidad del padre Juan de Mariana, Talavera de la Reina, 22-24 de marzo de 2017. -
Rethinking Athenian Democracy.Pdf
Rethinking Athenian Democracy A dissertation presented by Daniela Louise Cammack to The Department of Government in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the subject of Political Science Harvard University Cambridge, Massachusetts January 2013 © 2013 Daniela Cammack All rights reserved. Professor Richard Tuck Daniela Cammack Abstract Conventional accounts of classical Athenian democracy represent the assembly as the primary democratic institution in the Athenian political system. This looks reasonable in the light of modern democracy, which has typically developed through the democratization of legislative assemblies. Yet it conflicts with the evidence at our disposal. Our ancient sources suggest that the most significant and distinctively democratic institution in Athens was the courts, where decisions were made by large panels of randomly selected ordinary citizens with no possibility of appeal. This dissertation reinterprets Athenian democracy as “dikastic democracy” (from the Greek dikastēs, “judge”), defined as a mode of government in which ordinary citizens rule principally through their control of the administration of justice. It begins by casting doubt on two major planks in the modern interpretation of Athenian democracy: first, that it rested on a conception of the “wisdom of the multitude” akin to that advanced by epistemic democrats today, and second that it was “deliberative,” meaning that mass discussion of political matters played a defining role. The first plank rests largely on an argument made by Aristotle in support of mass political participation, which I show has been comprehensively misunderstood. The second rests on the interpretation of the verb “bouleuomai” as indicating speech, but I suggest that it meant internal reflection in both the courts and the assembly. -
Journal of Bengali Studies
ISSN 2277-9426 Journal of Bengali Studies Vol. 6 No. 1 The Age of Bhadralok: Bengal's Long Twentieth Century Dolpurnima 16 Phalgun 1424 1 March 2018 1 | Journal of Bengali Studies (ISSN 2277-9426) Vol. 6 No. 1 Journal of Bengali Studies (ISSN 2277-9426), Vol. 6 No. 1 Published on the Occasion of Dolpurnima, 16 Phalgun 1424 The Theme of this issue is The Age of Bhadralok: Bengal's Long Twentieth Century 2 | Journal of Bengali Studies (ISSN 2277-9426) Vol. 6 No. 1 ISSN 2277-9426 Journal of Bengali Studies Volume 6 Number 1 Dolpurnima 16 Phalgun 1424 1 March 2018 Spring Issue The Age of Bhadralok: Bengal's Long Twentieth Century Editorial Board: Tamal Dasgupta (Editor-in-Chief) Amit Shankar Saha (Editor) Mousumi Biswas Dasgupta (Editor) Sayantan Thakur (Editor) 3 | Journal of Bengali Studies (ISSN 2277-9426) Vol. 6 No. 1 Copyrights © Individual Contributors, while the Journal of Bengali Studies holds the publishing right for re-publishing the contents of the journal in future in any format, as per our terms and conditions and submission guidelines. Editorial©Tamal Dasgupta. Cover design©Tamal Dasgupta. Further, Journal of Bengali Studies is an open access, free for all e-journal and we promise to go by an Open Access Policy for readers, students, researchers and organizations as long as it remains for non-commercial purpose. However, any act of reproduction or redistribution (in any format) of this journal, or any part thereof, for commercial purpose and/or paid subscription must accompany prior written permission from the Editor, Journal of Bengali Studies. -
A Dictionary of Literary and Thematic Terms, Second Edition
A DICTIONARY OF Literary and Thematic Terms Second Edition EDWARD QUINN A Dictionary of Literary and Thematic Terms, Second Edition Copyright © 2006 by Edward Quinn All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by any information storage or retrieval systems, without permission in writing from the publisher. For information contact: Facts On File, Inc. An imprint of Infobase Publishing 132 West 31st Street New York NY 10001 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Quinn, Edward, 1932– A dictionary of literary and thematic terms / Edward Quinn—2nd ed. p. cm. Includes index. ISBN 0-8160-6243-9 (hc : alk. paper) 1. Criticism—Terminology. 2. Literature— Terminology. 3. Literature, Comparative—Themes, motives, etc.—Terminology. 4. English language—Terms and phrases. 5. Literary form—Terminology. I. Title. PN44.5.Q56 2006 803—dc22 2005029826 Facts On File books are available at special discounts when purchased in bulk quantities for businesses, associations, institutions or sales promotions. Please call our Special Sales Department in New York at (212) 967-8800 or (800) 322-8755. You can fi nd Facts On File on the World Wide Web at http://www.factsonfi le.com Text design by Sandra Watanabe Cover design by Cathy Rincon Printed in the United States of America MP FOF 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 This book is printed on acid-free paper. Contents Preface v Literary and Thematic Terms 1 Index 453 Preface This book offers the student or general reader a guide through the thicket of liter- ary terms. -
Rogues, Vagabonds and Sturdy Beggars, a New Gallery of Tudor
poofe 3^ebieiusi Rogues, Vagabonds, and Sturdy Beggars: A New Gallery of Tudor and Early Stuart Rogue Literature edited by Arthur F. Kinney; 18 illusfrations by John Lawrence. 328 pp. $18.95, paper University of Massachusetts Press Reviewed by John Mucci. Mr. Mucci is Associate Editor of The Elizabethan Review. On the endless road of popular culture, there has always been a genre of entertainment which supposedly reveals the mysteries of the under world. Although whatever insight might be exposed, from the canting jargon to the details of a crime, accuracy seems to take a back seat to satisfying curiosity and a need for sensationalism. Today, there are interesting things to be leamed about ourselves by reading the pecuUar genre of EUzabethan pamphleteering known as rogue literature. Popular with all levels of literate society, these slender books purported to set down the manner by which con artists of all types might abscond with decent peoples' money and goods. Ostensibly written as a public service, to wam and arm society against rogues of all types, in their fascinating variety, they are an Elizabethan version of mob stories, with curious and lurid detail. This interest with the underworld and the seamiest side of life is one which has obvious parallels in modem times, particularly with readers who are most threatened by and distanced from such criminals. This so-caUed practical element of defending the populace against these all-too-prevalent creatures falls to second place against the pleasure ofreading about others who have been hoodwinked by them (and better still, hearing the details about rogues who have been caught in the act and punished). -
National Movement in India
NATIONAL MOVEMENT IN INDIA SUBJECT CODE : 18BPA66S PREPARED BY : Dr.R.Anitha Guest lecturer DEPARTMENT : PG and Research Department Of Public Administration CONTACT NO : 9003500812 E Mail ID : [email protected] Material prepared according to textbook and reference books given in the syllabus. SYLLABUS British rule in India Establishment of British rule in India: Factors behind British success against Indian powers:- ● The British had firmly established their position by the middle of the nineteenth century and a large part of India came under their direct rule. ● The areas that remained independent were indirectly under British influence. There are various reasons for the success of the British rule against Indian rulers and some of them are listed as follows: Vacuum of power:- ● There was a vacuum of power in India after the Mughal Empire got fractured falling under its own weight. ● Its various governors and rebel commanders established their superiority at different places and started fighting against each other. This gave the British the opportunity to establish their trading posts in India. Flag followed the trade:- ● These trading posts were used to store the goods and for that British built many warehouses, which gave them an excuse to build forts and to build up armies to "protect" them. ● The East India Company made treaties with most of the kings to keep them satisfied so that they would not try and fight against the British. Lack of unity among Indian states:- ● Even though there were powerful Indian states like Punjab, Mysore and the Marathas that ruled Indian subcontinent during the mid-19th century, many of them were fighting with each other for different reasons. -
Hundred and Fifty Years of the Revolt of 1857: a Historiographical Construction
Karatoya: NBU J.Hist. Vol. II. 37-47 (2008) Hundred and Fifty years of the Revolt of 1857: A Historiographical Construction Ratna Roy Sanyal Professor Department of History North Bengal University In the 150th years of the revolt of 1857, a good number of seminars have been organized at different parts of the country to commemorate the great event through the lens ofhundr ed and fifty years. Voluminous literature, articles, monographs have been published on the various aspects ofthe Revolt. A project has been taken by the Indian Council ofHistorical Research to prepare an exhaustive bibliography ofthe works on the Revolt of 1857. In the year 2006, the number of collections had exceeded eight hundred. No doubt, the Great Revolt of 1857 is 1 a much discussed event in our history • Even after 150 years, scholars are not unanimous with regard to the nature of the Revolt. There is scarcity of singularity in the interpretation and characterization of the uprising. This is partly because of the hypothetical proverb that "All history is contemporary history" and partly for the information mostly documented in the official records and also for the historian's analysis ofthe matter from their own paradigmatic outlook. After Independence, archival documents, letters, especially Rebel's Proclamations, newspaper accounts have been published and are now accessible to scholars. Taken all the projections (as far as possible) on the subject, the present discourse will try to make a historiographical construction ofthe Great Revolt ofl 857 in hundred and fifty years perspective. Imperialist historians have documented the uprising as a 'Sepoy Mutiny'2 that was 3 "wholly unpatriotic and selfish . -
St. Lawrence High School 27, Ballygunge Circular Road
3/23/2021 Entab - CampusCare®| School ERP Software ST. LAWRENCE HIGH SCHOOL 27, BALLYGUNGE CIRCULAR ROAD ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Class : 10 Subject : HISTORY Term : SECOND TERM Max Marks : 80 Q 1 : The word ‘Ulgulan’ mean Marks : 1 1 . War 2 . Great Revolt ( This Answer is Correct ) 3 . Rebellion 4 . Revolution ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Q 2 : Who built a fortress to defend themselves from the British known as ‘Baser Kella’ Marks : 1 1 . Dudumiyan 2 . Titumir ( This Answer is Correct ) 3 . Syed Ahmed Barelvi 4 . Haji Shariatulla ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Q 3 : Who was popularly known as the ‘Father of revolutionary thought' Marks : 1 1 . Raja Rammohan Roy 2 . Akshay Kumar Dutta 3 . Bipin Chandra Pal ( This Answer is Correct ) 4 . Balgangadhar Tilak ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Q 4 : Who wrote ‘A Grammar of the Bengali Language’? Marks : 1 1 . M.Minto 2 . Halhed ( This Answer is Correct ) 3 . Clarence Rozario 4 . Ambrose Arokia ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Q 5 : Name the first principal of Calcutta Medical College. Marks : 1 1 . Dr.M.J.Baramley ( This Answer is Correct ) 2 . Dr.A.Swamy 3 . Dr.Nath Deb 4 . Dr.Andrew