DOCSLIB.ORG

Small Pelagics Fishery in Sonora, Gulf of California

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Small Pelagics Fishery in Sonora, Gulf of California SCS Global Services Report SMALL PELAGICS FISHERY IN SONORA, GULF OF CALIFORNIA MSC Fishery Assessment Report Public Certification Draft Report Prepared by: Dr. Carlos Alvarez (Lead, P1 & P3 Team Member) Ms. Sandra Andraka (P2 Team Member) Ms. Gabriela Anhalzer (Coordination, P2 Support) Dr. Sian Morgan (Quality Review) Natural Resources Division +1.510.452.xxxx [email protected] For Cámara Nacional de la Industria Pesquera (CANAINPES) Sonora, Mexico April 21st, 2017 2000 Powell Street, Ste. 600, Emeryville, CA 94608 USA +1.510.452.8000 main | +1.510.452.8001 fax www.SCSglobalServices.com SCS Global Services Report List of Tables .................................................................................................................... 1 List of Figures ................................................................................................................... 3 Glossary ........................................................................................................................... 6 1. Executive Summary ....................................................................................................... 9 Fishery Operations Overview ......................................................................................................................... 9 Assessment Overview .................................................................................................................................. 10 Summary of Findings ................................................................................................................................... 11 2. Authorship and Peer Reviewers ................................................................................... 12 2.1 Assessment Team ............................................................................................................. 12 2.2 Peer Reviewers ................................................................................................................. 13 Description of the Fishery ............................................................................................... 15 2.3 Unit(s) of Assessment (UoAs) and Scope of Certification Sought ......................................... 15 2.3.1 UoA and Proposed Unit of Certification (UoC) - Considered Final as Published in the Public Certification Report ..................................................................................................................................... 15 2.3.2 Total Allowable Catch (TAC) and Catch Data ...................................................................................... 18 2.3.3 Scope of Assessment in Relation to Enhanced Fisheries .................................................................... 18 2.3.4 Scope of Assessment in Relation to Introduced Species Based Fisheries (ISBF) ................................. 18 2.4 Overview of the Fishery .................................................................................................... 18 2.4.1 History of the Fishery .......................................................................................................................... 18 2.4.2 Organization and User Rights.............................................................................................................. 19 2.4.3 Areas ................................................................................................................................................... 21 2.4.4 General Management ......................................................................................................................... 22 2.4.5 Description of Fishing Practices: Gear and Seasons ............................................................................ 22 2.5 Principle One: Target Species Background ......................................................................... 23 2.5.1 Catch and Effort of the Small Pelagics Fishery .................................................................................... 23 2.5.2 Management ...................................................................................................................................... 28 2.5.3 Pacific Sardines ................................................................................................................................... 36 2.5.4 Thread Herring .................................................................................................................................... 52 2.6 Principle Two: Ecosystem Background ............................................................................... 61 2.6.1 Observer Programs ............................................................................................................................. 61 2.6.2 Overview of Non-Target Catch ............................................................................................................ 63 2.6.3 Retained Species ................................................................................................................................. 67 2.6.4 Bycatch Species ................................................................................................................................... 75 2.6.5 Endangered, Threatened and Protected (ETP) Species ...................................................................... 78 2.6.6 Mitigation measures ........................................................................................................................... 91 2.6.7 Habitat Impacts ................................................................................................................................... 93 2.6.8 Ecosystem Impacts .............................................................................................................................. 99 2.7 Principle Three: Management System Background .......................................................... 102 2.7.1 Area of Operation and Relevant Jurisdictions................................................................................... 102 2.7.2 National Level Management ............................................................................................................. 103 2.7.3 Fishery-Specific Management ........................................................................................................... 104 2.7.4 Decision Making Processes ............................................................................................................... 106 2.7.5 Recognized Interest Groups .............................................................................................................. 107 2.7.6 Consultation Processes ..................................................................................................................... 107 2.7.7 Planned Education and Training for Interest Groups........................................................................ 109 2.7.8 Monitoring, Control, Surveillance and Enforcement ........................................................................ 110 2.7.9 Evaluation for the Management System .......................................................................................... 112 Version 1-0 (May 2016) | © SCS Global Services | Full Assessment Report MSC V2.0 SCS Global Services Report 4. Evaluation Procedure ................................................................................................ 113 4.1 Harmonized Fishery Assessment ..................................................................................... 113 4.2 Previous assessments ..................................................................................................... 115 4.3 Assessment Methodologies ............................................................................................ 118 4.4 Evaluation Processes and Techniques .............................................................................. 118 4.4.1 Site Visits ........................................................................................................................................... 118 4.4.2 Consultations .................................................................................................................................... 120 4.4.3 Evaluation Techniques ...................................................................................................................... 122 5. Traceability .............................................................................................................. 126 5.1 Eligibility Date ................................................................................................................ 126 5.2 Traceability within the Fishery ........................................................................................ 126 5.3 Eligibility to Enter Further Chains of Custody ................................................................... 129 5.4 Eligibility of Inseparable or Practicably Inseparable (IPI) stock(s) to Enter Further Chains of Custody................................................................................................................................ 130 6. Evaluation Results .................................................................................................... 132 6.1 Principle Level Scores ...................................................................................................... 132 6.3 Summary of PI Level Scores ............................................................................................. 133 6.4
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Worldwide Large-Scale Fluctuations of Sardine and Anchovy Populations
    S. AP. J. mar. Sci. 21: 289-347 1999 289 WORLDWIDE LARGE-SCALE FLUCTUATIONS OF SARDINE AND ANCHOVY POPULATIONS R. A. SCHwARTZLOSEl, J. ALHEIT2,A. BAKUN3, T. R. BAUMGARTNER4, R. CLOETE5, R. J. M. CRAWFORD6,W. J. FLETCHER7, Y. GREEN-RUIZ8, E. HAGEN2, T. KAWASAKI9, D. LLUCH-BELDAIO, S. E. LLUCH-COTA11, A. D. MacCALL12, Y. MATSUURA13,M. O. NEVAREZ-MARTINEZ14, R.H. PARRISH15, C.ROY6, R. SERRAI6, K. V.SHUST17, M. N. WARD18 and J. Z. ZUZUNAGA19 Decade-scale regimes of sardine Surdinops sagax and anchovy Engruulis spp. have been observed in the productive coastal waters of the North-Western, North-Eastem and South-Eastem Pacific and the South-Eastem Atlantic. In each of these systems, the two genera fluctuate out of phase with each other. The subdominant genus may initiate a recovery while the other species is still abundant, so population growth is not necessarily a response to a vacant niche. Rather, it appears to be triggered by formation of one or a few powerful year-classes. At high population levels, quality of sardine and their eggs decreased in Japan, leading to decreased production and survival of eggs, poor year- classes and stock collapse. Excessive fishing of strong year-classes early in the recovery stage may prevent a species from assuming dominance, so influencing the natural succession of species. This may greatly alter the structure and functioning of an ecosystem. For example, a mesopelagic forage fish may replace an epipelagic one, with severe , repercussions for predators that can only feed in the upper ocean, e.g. some seabirds.
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliography Database of Living/Fossil Sharks, Rays and Chimaeras (Chondrichthyes: Elasmobranchii, Holocephali) Papers of the Year 2016
    www.shark-references.com Version 13.01.2017 Bibliography database of living/fossil sharks, rays and chimaeras (Chondrichthyes: Elasmobranchii, Holocephali) Papers of the year 2016 published by Jürgen Pollerspöck, Benediktinerring 34, 94569 Stephansposching, Germany and Nicolas Straube, Munich, Germany ISSN: 2195-6499 copyright by the authors 1 please inform us about missing papers: [email protected] www.shark-references.com Version 13.01.2017 Abstract: This paper contains a collection of 803 citations (no conference abstracts) on topics related to extant and extinct Chondrichthyes (sharks, rays, and chimaeras) as well as a list of Chondrichthyan species and hosted parasites newly described in 2016. The list is the result of regular queries in numerous journals, books and online publications. It provides a complete list of publication citations as well as a database report containing rearranged subsets of the list sorted by the keyword statistics, extant and extinct genera and species descriptions from the years 2000 to 2016, list of descriptions of extinct and extant species from 2016, parasitology, reproduction, distribution, diet, conservation, and taxonomy. The paper is intended to be consulted for information. In addition, we provide information on the geographic and depth distribution of newly described species, i.e. the type specimens from the year 1990- 2016 in a hot spot analysis. Please note that the content of this paper has been compiled to the best of our abilities based on current knowledge and practice, however,
    [Show full text]
  • Índice General
    INSTITUTO POLITÉCNICO NACIONAL CENTRO INTERDISCIPLINARIO DE CIENCIAS MARINAS DEPARTAMENTO DE PESQUERÍAS Y BIOLOGÍA MARINA PATRONES LATITUDINALES DE COMPOSICIÓN Y DIVERSIDAD FUNCIONAL DE PECES ASOCIADOS A LA PESCA DE CAMARÓN DEL PACÍFICO MEXICANO TESIS QUE PARA OBTENER EL GRADO DE DOCTOR EN CIENCIAS MARINAS PRESENTA DEIVIS SAMUEL PALACIOS SALGADO LA PAZ, B.C.S., JUNIO DE 2011 SIP-14 BIS .INSTITUTO POLITÉCNICO NACIONAL SECRETARIA DE INVESTIGACIÓN Y POSGRADO ACTA DE REVISIÓN DE TESIS En la Ciudad de La Paz, B.C.S., siendo las 12:00 horas del día 23 del mes de Mayo del 2011 se reunieron los miembros de la Comisión Revisora de Tesis designada por el Colegio de Profesores de Estudios de Posgrado e Investigación de CICIMAR para examinar la tesis titulada: "PATRONES LATITUDINALES DE COMPOSICIÓN Y DIVERSIDAD FUNCIONAL DE PECES ASOCIADOS A LA PESCA DE CAMARÓN DEL PACÍFICO MEXICANO" Presentada por el alumno: PALACIOS SALDADO DEIVIS SAMUEL Apellido paterno materno nombre(s) Con registro: o 7 2 1 9 Aspirante de: DOCTORADO EN CIENCIAS MARINAS Después de intercambiar opiniones los miembros de la Comisión manifestaron APROBAR LA DEFENSA DE LA TESIS, en virtud de que satisface los requisitos señalados por las disposiciones reglamentarias vigentes. LA COMISIÓN REVISORA Directores de Tesis DR. MAN TINA REJÓN or de DR. FRANCISCO ARREGUIN SÁ DR. LEONARDO ANDR lA CÁRDENAS DR. HORACIO PÉREZ ESPAÑA PRESIDENTE DEL COLEGIO DE PROFESORES IPN CICIMAR DIRECCIÓN INSTITUTO POLITÉCNICO NACIONAL SECRETARÍA DE INVESTIGACIÓN Y POSGRADO CARTA CESIÓN DE DERECHOS En la Ciudad de La Paz, B.C.S., el día 01 del mes Junio del año 2011 el (la) que suscribe MC.
    [Show full text]
  • Status of the Fisheries Report an Update Through 2008
    STATUS OF THE FISHERIES REPORT AN UPDATE THROUGH 2008 Photo credit: Edgar Roberts. Report to the California Fish and Game Commission as directed by the Marine Life Management Act of 1998 Prepared by California Department of Fish and Game Marine Region August 2010 Acknowledgements Many of the fishery reviews in this report are updates of the reviews contained in California’s Living Marine Resources: A Status Report published in 2001. California’s Living Marine Resources provides a complete review of California’s three major marine ecosystems (nearshore, offshore, and bays and estuaries) and all the important plants and marine animals that dwell there. This report, along with the Updates for 2003 and 2006, is available on the Department’s website. All the reviews in this report were contributed by California Department of Fish and Game biologists unless another affiliation is indicated. Author’s names and email addresses are provided with each review. The Editor would like to thank the contributors for their efforts. All the contributors endeavored to make their reviews as accurate and up-to-date as possible. Additionally, thanks go to the photographers whose photos are included in this report. Editor Traci Larinto Senior Marine Biologist Specialist California Department of Fish and Game [email protected] Status of the Fisheries Report 2008 ii Table of Contents 1 Coonstripe Shrimp, Pandalus danae .................................................................1-1 2 Kellet’s Whelk, Kelletia kelletii ...........................................................................2-1
    [Show full text]
  • Taverampe2018.Pdf
    Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 121 (2018) 212–223 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ympev Multilocus phylogeny, divergence times, and a major role for the benthic-to- T pelagic axis in the diversification of grunts (Haemulidae) ⁎ Jose Taveraa,b, , Arturo Acero P.c, Peter C. Wainwrightb a Departamento de Biología, Universidad del Valle, Cali, Colombia b Department of Evolution and Ecology, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, United States c Instituto de Estudios en Ciencias del Mar, CECIMAR, Universidad Nacional de Colombia sede Caribe, El Rodadero, Santa Marta, Colombia ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: We present a phylogenetic analysis with divergence time estimates, and an ecomorphological assessment of the Percomorpharia role of the benthic-to-pelagic axis of diversification in the history of haemulid fishes. Phylogenetic analyses were Fish performed on 97 grunt species based on sequence data collected from seven loci. Divergence time estimation Functional traits indicates that Haemulidae originated during the mid Eocene (54.7–42.3 Ma) but that the major lineages were Morphospace formed during the mid-Oligocene 30–25 Ma. We propose a new classification that reflects the phylogenetic Macroevolution history of grunts. Overall the pattern of morphological and functional diversification in grunts appears to be Zooplanktivore strongly linked with feeding ecology. Feeding traits and the first principal component of body shape strongly separate species that feed in benthic and pelagic habitats. The benthic-to-pelagic axis has been the major axis of ecomorphological diversification in this important group of tropical shoreline fishes, with about 13 transitions between feeding habitats that have had major consequences for head and body morphology.
    [Show full text]
  • A List of Common and Scientific Names of Fishes from the United States And
    t a AMERICAN FISHERIES SOCIETY QL 614 .A43 V.2 .A 4-3 AMERICAN FISHERIES SOCIETY Special Publication No. 2 A List of Common and Scientific Names of Fishes -^ ru from the United States m CD and Canada (SECOND EDITION) A/^Ssrf>* '-^\ —---^ Report of the Committee on Names of Fishes, Presented at the Ei^ty-ninth Annual Meeting, Clearwater, Florida, September 16-18, 1959 Reeve M. Bailey, Chairman Ernest A. Lachner, C. C. Lindsey, C. Richard Robins Phil M. Roedel, W. B. Scott, Loren P. Woods Ann Arbor, Michigan • 1960 Copies of this publication may be purchased for $1.00 each (paper cover) or $2.00 (cloth cover). Orders, accompanied by remittance payable to the American Fisheries Society, should be addressed to E. A. Seaman, Secretary-Treasurer, American Fisheries Society, Box 483, McLean, Virginia. Copyright 1960 American Fisheries Society Printed by Waverly Press, Inc. Baltimore, Maryland lutroduction This second list of the names of fishes of The shore fishes from Greenland, eastern the United States and Canada is not sim- Canada and the United States, and the ply a reprinting with corrections, but con- northern Gulf of Mexico to the mouth of stitutes a major revision and enlargement. the Rio Grande are included, but those The earlier list, published in 1948 as Special from Iceland, Bermuda, the Bahamas, Cuba Publication No. 1 of the American Fisheries and the other West Indian islands, and Society, has been widely used and has Mexico are excluded unless they occur also contributed substantially toward its goal of in the region covered. In the Pacific, the achieving uniformity and avoiding confusion area treated includes that part of the conti- in nomenclature.
    [Show full text]
  • Stable Isotope Analysis of Juvenile White Sharks Inside a Nursery Area Reveals Foraging in Demersal-Inshore Habitats and Trophic Overlap with Sympatric
    fmars-08-687738 August 5, 2021 Time: 12:53 # 1 ORIGINAL RESEARCH published: 10 August 2021 doi: 10.3389/fmars.2021.687738 Stable Isotope Analysis of Juvenile White Sharks Inside a Nursery Area Reveals Foraging in Demersal-Inshore Habitats and Trophic Overlap With Sympatric Edited by: Sharks J. Marcus Drymon, 1† 1 † 1 † Mississippi State University, Emiliano García-Rodríguez , Sharon Z. Herzka * , Oscar Sosa-Nishizaki * , United States Christopher G. Lowe2 and John B. O’Sullivan3 Reviewed by: 1 Department of Biological Oceanography, Center for Scientific Research and Higher Education of Ensenada (CICESE), Simona Alessandra Ceriani, Ensenada, Mexico, 2 Department of Biological Sciences, California State University, Long Beach, CA, United States, Florida Fish and Wildlife Research 3 Monterey Bay Aquarium, Monterey, CA, United States Institute, United States Richard Reina, Monash University, Australia Knowledge about top predators’ trophic ecology is crucial for defining their role *Correspondence: in ecosystems, understanding habitat preferences, characterizing life stage-specific Sharon Z. Herzka feeding habits, and evaluating their interaction with fisheries. In the northeastern Pacific, [email protected] Oscar Sosa-Nishizaki white sharks (Carcharodon carcharias) occupy coastal habitats during the early life [email protected] stages, including Bahía Sebastián Vizcaíno (BSV) in Mexico, which is a known nursery †ORCID: area. Although BSV presumably provides high prey abundance, the trophic ecology of Emiliano García-Rodríguez orcid.org/0000-0002-9078-1300 immature white sharks is poorly understood. Carbon and nitrogen bulk stable isotope Sharon Z. Herzka analyses (SIA) were used to explore the trophic relationship of early life stages with orcid.org/0000-0001-7091-7656 their potential prey and to infer dietary overlap with sympatric sharks, while SIA of Oscar Sosa-Nishizaki orcid.org/0000-0002-3043-768X amino acids were used to estimate trophic position.
    [Show full text]
  • Orcas in Our Midst, Volume 2, the Next Generation
    Salish Sea Watershed and Columbia Basin The Salish Sea includes marine waters from Puget Sound, Washington to Georgia Strait, British Columbia. Orcas forage and travel throughout these inland waters, and also depend on salmon returning to the Columbia River, especially in winter months. Map courtesy of Harvey Greenberg, Department of Earth and Space Sciences, University of Washington (from USGS data). The Whales Who Share Our Inland Waters J pod, with some L pod orcas, in a formation known as “resting.” In this pattern, pods travel slowly in tight lines just under the surface for a few minutes, then rise for a series of blows for a minute or two. Photo by Jeff Hogan. Volume 2: The Next Generation Second Edition, March, 2006, updated August 2010 First edition funded by Puget Sound Action Team’s Public Involvement and Education Program by Howard Garrett Orca Network Whidbey Island, Washington Olympia, Washington www.orcanetwork.org www.psat.wa.gov Teachers: Student Activity guides by Jeff Hogan, Killer Whale Tales, Vashon, WA available at www.killerwhaletales.org or contact [email protected]. Orca Network is dedicated to raising awareness about the whales of the Pacific Northwest and the importance of providing them healthy and safe habitats. COVER: “Salmon Hunter” by Randall Scott Courtesy of Wild Wings, LLC.Lake City, MN 55041 Prints by the artist may be ordered by calling 1-800-445-4833 J1, at over 50 years old, swims in the center of a tight group of close family including newborn J38, at right. Photo by Jeff Hogan, Killer Whale Tales. Dedication To the mysterious orcas roaming these bountiful waters, to readers of all ages who seek to understand wildlife in their natural settings, to celebrate the whales’ presence here, and to help protect and restore the habitats we share with our orca neighbors.
    [Show full text]
  • A Checklist of the Fishes of the Monterey Bay Area Including Elkhorn Slough, the San Lorenzo, Pajaro and Salinas Rivers
    f3/oC-4'( Contributions from the Moss Landing Marine Laboratories No. 26 Technical Publication 72-2 CASUC-MLML-TP-72-02 A CHECKLIST OF THE FISHES OF THE MONTEREY BAY AREA INCLUDING ELKHORN SLOUGH, THE SAN LORENZO, PAJARO AND SALINAS RIVERS by Gary E. Kukowski Sea Grant Research Assistant June 1972 LIBRARY Moss L8ndillg ,\:Jrine Laboratories r. O. Box 223 Moss Landing, Calif. 95039 This study was supported by National Sea Grant Program National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration United States Department of Commerce - Grant No. 2-35137 to Moss Landing Marine Laboratories of the California State University at Fresno, Hayward, Sacramento, San Francisco, and San Jose Dr. Robert E. Arnal, Coordinator , ·./ "':., - 'I." ~:. 1"-"'00 ~~ ~~ IAbm>~toriesi Technical Publication 72-2: A GI-lliGKL.TST OF THE FISHES OF TtlE MONTEREY my Jl.REA INCLUDING mmORH SLOUGH, THE SAN LCRENZO, PAY-ARO AND SALINAS RIVERS .. 1&let~: Page 14 - A1estria§.·~iligtro1ophua - Stone cockscomb - r-m Page 17 - J:,iparis'W10pus." Ribbon' snailt'ish - HE , ,~ ~Ei 31 - AlectrlQ~iu.e,ctro1OphUfi- 87-B9 . .', . ': ". .' Page 31 - Ceb1diehtlrrs rlolaCewi - 89 , Page 35 - Liparis t!01:f-.e - 89 .Qhange: Page 11 - FmWulns parvipin¢.rl, add: Probable misidentification Page 20 - .BathopWuBt.lemin&, change to: .Mhgghilu§. llemipg+ Page 54 - Ji\mdJ11ui~~ add: Probable. misidentifioation Page 60 - Item. number 67, authOr should be .Hubbs, Clark TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 1 AREA OF COVERAGE 1 METHODS OF LITERATURE SEARCH 2 EXPLANATION OF CHECKLIST 2 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 4 TABLE 1
    [Show full text]
  • Peces De La Fauna De Acompañamiento En La Pesca Industrial De Camarón En El Golfo De California, México
    Peces de la fauna de acompañamiento en la pesca industrial de camarón en el Golfo de California, México Juana López-Martínez1, Eloisa Herrera-Valdivia1, Jesús Rodríguez-Romero2 & Sergio Hernández-Vázquez2 1. Centro de Investigaciones Biológicas del Noroeste, S.C. Km 2.35 Carretera a Las Tinajas, S/N Colonia Tinajas, Guaymas, Sonora, México C. P. 85460; [email protected], [email protected] 2. Centro de Investigaciones Biológicas del Noroeste, S.C. Apdo. postal 128 La Paz, B.C.S. C.P. 23000; [email protected], [email protected] Recibido 19-VII-2009. Corregido 15-III-2010. Aceptado 16-IV-2010. Abstract: Bycatch fish species from shrimp industrial fishery in the Gulf of California, Mexico. The shrimp fishery in the Gulf of California is one the most important activities of revenue and employment for communi- ties. Nevertheless, this fishery has also created a large bycatch problem, principally fish. To asses this issue, a group of observers were placed on board the industrial shrimp fleet and evaluated the Eastern side of the Gulf during 2004 and 2005. Studies consisted on 20kg samples of the capture for each trawl, and made possible a sys- tematic list of species for this geographic area. Fish represented 70% of the capture. A total of 51 101 fish were collected, belonging to two classes, 20 orders, 65 families, 127 genera, and 241 species. The order Perciformes was the most diverse with 31 families, 78 genera, and 158 species. The best represented families by number of species were: Sciaenidae (34) and Paralichthyidae (18) and Haemulidae and Carangidae (16 each).
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to the Coastal Marine Fishes of California
    STATE OF CALIFORNIA THE RESOURCES AGENCY DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME FISH BULLETIN 157 GUIDE TO THE COASTAL MARINE FISHES OF CALIFORNIA by DANIEL J. MILLER and ROBERT N. LEA Marine Resources Region 1972 ABSTRACT This is a comprehensive identification guide encompassing all shallow marine fishes within California waters. Geographic range limits, maximum size, depth range, a brief color description, and some meristic counts including, if available: fin ray counts, lateral line pores, lateral line scales, gill rakers, and vertebrae are given. Body proportions and shapes are used in the keys and a state- ment concerning the rarity or commonness in California is given for each species. In all, 554 species are described. Three of these have not been re- corded or confirmed as occurring in California waters but are included since they are apt to appear. The remainder have been recorded as occurring in an area between the Mexican and Oregon borders and offshore to at least 50 miles. Five of California species as yet have not been named or described, and ichthyologists studying these new forms have given information on identification to enable inclusion here. A dichotomous key to 144 families includes an outline figure of a repre- sentative for all but two families. Keys are presented for all larger families, and diagnostic features are pointed out on most of the figures. Illustrations are presented for all but eight species. Of the 554 species, 439 are found primarily in depths less than 400 ft., 48 are meso- or bathypelagic species, and 67 are deepwater bottom dwelling forms rarely taken in less than 400 ft.
    [Show full text]
  • Proposal to Retire the Orca Tokitae/Lolita to Her Native Habitat in the Pacific Northwest
    PROPOSAL TO RETIRE THE ORCA LOLITA TO HER NATIVE HABITAT IN THE PACIFIC NORTHWEST Lolita in the 80’ long x 35’ wide x 20’ deep tank in Miami. Lolita’s seapen rehabilitation and retirement home in the San Juan Islands. Lolita’s seapen site in the San Juan Islands. The location for Lolita's seapen in the San Juan Islands. Depths are at low mean tide, in fathoms. Seapen site in the San Juan Islands. TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction II. Executive Summary III. Background IV. Lolita’s Retirement Plan A. Step by step plan B. Goals C. Permitting D. Transport I. Introduction (revised Feb. 17, 2018) The original proposal for Lolita’s rehabilitation and retirement was first prepared by Center for Whale Research, Friday Harbor, WA, in April, 1995, (see Marine Biologist Ken Balcomb's Comprehensive Retirement Plan - A pre-proposal to return and rehabilitate a captive killer whale named Lolita to her home waters in Greater Puget Sound. Prepared by Center for Whale Research, April, 1995, For the 1995 Annual Meeting of the Association of Zoos and Aquariums in Seattle) and has been developed in collaboration with Orca Network in Freeland, WA. This draft proposal for Lolita’s retirement assumes that all concerned want the best outcome for Lolita, and further assumes that moving Lolita from Miami to her native waters in the Pacific NW in a carefully phased and professionally conducted transport, rehabilitation, and retirement program, with prescribed contingencies to meet all foreseeable circumstances, would be physically and mentally therapeutic and beneficial for her overall health and well-being.
    [Show full text]