DOCSLIB.ORG

Evaluation of Oral Function Before and After Frenectomy in Breastfed Infants Diagnosed with Tethered Oral Tissue Cindy L

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Evaluation of Oral Function Before and After Frenectomy in Breastfed Infants Diagnosed with Tethered Oral Tissue Cindy L Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 10-20-2018 Evaluation of Oral Function Before and After Frenectomy in Breastfed Infants Diagnosed with Tethered Oral Tissue Cindy L. Parr Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations Part of the Speech Pathology and Audiology Commons Recommended Citation Parr, Cindy L., "Evaluation of Oral Function Before and After Frenectomy in Breastfed Infants Diagnosed with Tethered Oral Tissue" (2018). LSU Doctoral Dissertations. 4734. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations/4734 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please [email protected]. EVALUATION OF ORAL FUNCTION BEFORE AND AFTER FRENECTOMY IN BREASTFED INFANTS DIAGNOSED WITH TETHERED ORAL TISSUE A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College In partial fulfillment of the Requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The Department of Communication Disorders by Cindy Lane Parr B.A., Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, 2010 M.A., Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, 2014 December 2018 This work is dedicated to my husband, Scott ‘Skip’ Parr. Without his love, support, patience, and insight, this journey would not have been possible. In loving memory of my sister, Patricia Jenne Lane. You would be so proud. 1991-2018 ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank my major professor and mentor, Dr. Jan Norris, for believing in me since the very beginning. You took a chance on a girl with no background in the field of speech- language pathology and helped mold me into the woman, teacher, researcher, and clinician I am today. It is difficult to put into words the impact you and this program have had, and will continue to have, on my education, career, and personal growth. You have always supported me and never let me quit, even when I really wanted to. You are the kindest soul I have ever had the pleasure of knowing and I admire your thirst for knowledge. Thank you for all of your wisdom and guidance throughout this journey. Thank you to my committee members Dr. Paul Hoffman, Dr. Daphne Hartzheim, and Dr. Jacqueline Bach. Dr. Hoffman, thank you for your theoretical and statistical insight throughout my Ph.D. Your wisdom and sense of humor made even the toughest days better. Dr. Hartzheim, thank you for your guidance and compassion so that I could see this endeavor through the end. You have made me a better researcher and critical thinker. Thank you Dr. Bach for being a wonderful addition to my committee as the Dean’s representative. I am honored you were able to give your time and watch me grow as a researcher. To Courtney Gonsoulin, thank you for all of your support as my mentor, clinical supervisor, instructor, colleague, friend, and “Louisiana mama.” You have always treated me like family and you have always been there when I needed you the most. Your character and strength speak volumes, which I aim to emulate on a daily basis. You are truly a blessing and I would not have developed a passion for pediatric feeding and swallowing if it had not been for you. Also, your family has had a tremendous impact on my life. Papa Kent, Jack, Lee, Claire, iii and Kate (my favorite), thank you for the laughs, love, encouragement, hugs, and all the home- cooked meals along the way. I am forever grateful for you. Thank you Dr. Michael Juban for being a great mentor, colleague, and friend. I appreciate your generosity and support throughout this journey. I will always respect your determination to go above and beyond in everything you do. Let me know when work slows down so we can start publishing together. Without you and your amazing employees at Juban Dental, data collection for this study would not have been possible. A special thank you to Erin Collins for being so dependable and organized throughout the data collection process. You are an amazing speech-language pathologist and you possess a genuinely remarkable talent for helping others. I could not have done this without you and I cannot thank you enough. To my colleagues and friends (who sometimes feel more like family), especially Simone Laroussini, Emily Johnston, Ashley Larson, Melissa Lalande, Wendy Jumonville, Megan Musso, Teresa Miller, Denise Thompson, and Jamie Findley, thank you for imparting your knowledge and expertise so that we can work together to help families and to grow our professions. You have all helped me become a better clinician and, in turn, a better researcher. I admire each of you for many reasons and I am so thankful to have worked alongside you. A special thanks to Jeanne Pichoff, Ashley Waguespack, Megan Dewberry, Crystal Sewell, and a number of lactation consultants in the state of Louisiana for your talents and support throughout this study. Thank you to my fellow doctoral students who have persevered alongside me throughout this program. You truly understand what it’s like on the inside and can attest to the blood, sweat, and tears it takes to get to the finish line. Thank you, especially, Dr. Laura Delrose (my forever officemate), Dr. Rebecca Parker, Dr. Chantelle Varnado, Dr. Cara Tyson, Dr. Ashley Meaux, Dr. Crystal Randolph, Dr. Jan Bradshaw, Dr. Andy Rivière, Dr. Lindsey Turner, Dr. Kyomi iv Gregory, Dr. Christy Seidel, Dr. Christina Tausch, and Dr. Christy Moland for showing that it can be done. To Matthew Vansant and Lindsey Parker, who are on their way to the finish line as well, thank you for your unending support and encouragement. To the student volunteers in the Language Intervention Lab at Louisiana State University, thank you for your hard work and dedication throughout the years. It has been an honor being your lab manager and mentor. I have had the pleasure of knowing many enthusiastic and devoted students throughout this doctoral program and it has been extremely rewarding working with you all. Thank you to the mothers and infants who participated in this study. Being a mother is tough, but being the mother of an infant who has difficulty feeding and swallowing is especially challenging. The time and commitment it took to complete the evaluations, undergo treatment, and pursue follow-up care are appreciated beyond belief and are what made this study possible. And last, but certainly not least, thank you to my family. Mom, thank you for always encouraging me to “do whatever makes you happy” and to pursue my dreams. Dad, thank you for your unwavering support and for always believing in me. I am so thankful for you and my wonderful stepmother, Debra, and your words of wisdom. To my sisters, Julie and Katie, thank you for always loving me and being my biggest cheerleaders in life. You are the greatest support system. I am blessed to have married a man who also gave me a family full of endless love and support. Also, to my grandparents, aunts, uncles, cousins, thank you all. I am one lucky girl. v TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ........................................................................................................... iii LIST OF TABLES ....................................................................................................................... viii LIST OF FIGURES ........................................................................................................................ x ABSTRACT ................................................................................................................................... xi INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 1 LITERATURE REVIEW ............................................................................................................... 3 METHODS .................................................................................................................................. 39 RESULTS .................................................................................................................................... 60 DISCUSSION ............................................................................................................................. 108 REFERENCES ........................................................................................................................... 117 APPENDIX A: IRB INFORMATION ...................................................................................... 122 APPENDIX B: SLP TRAINING CHECKLIST ........................................................................ 127 APPENDIX C: LATCH TOOL ................................................................................................. 129 APPENDIX D: ASSESSMENT TOOL FOR LINGUAL FRENULUM FUNCTION (ATLFF) ..................................................................................................................................................... 130 APPENDIX E: LINGUAL FRENULUM PROTOCOL WITH SCORES FOR INFANTS ..... 132 APPENDIX F: SYMPTOM/COMPLAINT CHECKLIST ........................................................ 136 APPENDIX G: PRE-FRENECTOMY QUESTIONNAIRE ...................................................... 138 APPENDIX H: POST-FRENECTOMY QUESTIONNAIRE
Load more

Recommended publications
  • (FNE) and Nasal Endoscopy in Ireland During COVID-19 Pandemic Rev 1
    Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland Coláiste Ríoga na Máinleá in Éirinn Interim Clinical Guidance on Flexible Nasendoscopy (FNE) and Nasal Endoscopy in Ireland during COVID-19 pandemic Rev 1 INTERIM CLINICAL GUIDANCE ON FLEXIBLE NASENDOSCOPY (FNE) AND NASAL ENDOSCOPY IN IRELAND DURING COVID-19 PANDEMIC Rev 1 INTERIM CLINICAL GUIDANCE ON FLEXIBLE NASENDOSCOPY (FNE) AND NASAL ENDOSCOPY IN IRELAND DURING COVID-19 PANDEMIC Table of Contents 1. Overview ............................................................................................................................................................................. 2 2. Purpose ............................................................................................................................................................................... 2 3. Authorship ......................................................................................................................................................................... 2 4. Target Audience .............................................................................................................................................................. 2 5. Introduction ....................................................................................................................................................................... 2 6. Risk of infection associated with FNE .................................................................................................................. 2 7. Aerosol Generating Procedures
    [Show full text]
  • Surgical Treatment of Snoring and Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome
    Medical Policy Surgical Treatment of Snoring and Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome Table of Contents Policy: Commercial Coding Information Information Pertaining to All Policies Policy: Medicare Description References Authorization Information Policy History Policy Number: 130 BCBSA Reference Number: 7.01.101 Related Policies None Policy Commercial Members: Managed Care (HMO and POS), PPO, and Indemnity Medicare HMO BlueSM and Medicare PPO BlueSM Members Uvulopalatopharyngoplasty (UPPP) may be MEDICALLY NECESSARY for the treatment of clinically significant obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) in appropriately selected adult patients who have failed an adequate trial of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) or failed an adequate trial of an oral appliance (OA). Clinically significant OSA is defined as those patients who have: Apnea/hypopnea Index (AHI) or Respiratory Disturbance Index (RDI) 15 or more events per hour, or AHI or RDI 5 or more events and 14 or less events per hour with documented symptoms of excessive daytime sleepiness, impaired cognition, mood disorders or insomnia, or documented hypertension, ischemic heart disease, or history of stroke. Hyoid suspension, surgical modification of the tongue, and/or maxillofacial surgery, including mandibular- maxillary advancement (MMA), may be MEDICALLY NECESSARY in appropriately selected adult patients with clinically significant OSA and objective documentation of hypopharyngeal obstruction who have failed an adequate trial of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) or failed an adequate trial of an oral appliance (OA). Clinically significant OSA is defined as those patients who have: AHI or RDI 15 or more events per hour, or AHI or RDI 5 or more events and 14 or less events per hour with documented symptoms of excessive daytime sleepiness, impaired cognition, mood disorders or insomnia, or documented hypertension, ischemic heart disease, or history of stroke.
    [Show full text]
  • Home Care After Sleep Surgery-Uvulopalatopharyngoplasty (UP3) And/Or Tonsillectomy
    Home Care after Sleep Surgery-Uvulopalatopharyngoplasty (UP3) and/or Tonsillectomy The above surgeries are all performed on patients to help relieve or lessen the symptoms of sleep apnea. All address the palate, or the upper part of your throat. General Information You may lack energy for several days, and may also be restless at night. This will improve over the next 10 to 14 days. It is quite common to feel progressively worse during the first five to six days after surgery. You may also become constipated during this time for three reasons: you will not be eating a regular diet, you will be taking pain medications, and you may be less active. Wound Care All of the above surgeries are performed within the mouth on the upper throat. No external incisions are made, all are internal. Depending on the surgery, you may feel and/or see some suture on your palate (upper throat). This is normal and will dissolve over the next two weeks. No specific wound care is necessary for these procedures. Diet It is important for you to drink plenty of fluids after surgery. Drink every hour while awake. A soft diet is recommended for the first 14 days (anything that you may eat without teeth constitutes as a soft diet). Avoid hot liquids/solids. It is alright if you don’t feel like eating much, as long as you drink lots of fluids. Signs that you need to drink more are when the urine is darker in color (urine should be pale yellow). A high fever that persists may also be a sign that you are not taking in enough fluids.
    [Show full text]
  • The Importance of Orofacial Myofunctional Therapy Before and After CO2 Laser Frenectomy in Achieving Optimal Orofacial Function
    LASERfocus The Importance of Orofacial Myofunctional Therapy Before and After CO2 Laser Frenectomy in Achieving Optimal Orofacial Function by Karen M. Wuertz, DDS, ABCDSM, DABLS, FOM, and Brooke Pettus, RDH, BSDH, COMS Frenectomy Methods ing, speaking, and breathing patterns may be Frenotomies performed with a scalpel or scissors can be accompanied by caused by incorrect oral posture and oral re- significant bleeding, obscuring the surgical field making it difficult to ensure strictions. Therefore, in the authors’ opinion, if the restriction has been completely removed. Because of the increased risk the removal of oral restrictions is necessary to of early primary closure of the site, postoperative active wound care is es- attain optimal orofacial function, and must be sential to reduce the risk of potential scarring. To properly restore and main- combined with regular pre- and post-frenecto- tain optimum function, active wound care should be implemented as soon my orofacial myofunctional therapy (OMT).1,4 as possible. However, if sutures are placed, the active wound care may be OMT helps re-educate the tongue and orofa- delayed so as not to cause early tearing of tissue. Due to the contact nature of cial muscles during movement and at rest to conventional procedure, there is a certain potential for infection; in addition, create new neuromuscular patterns for proper higher levels of postoperative pain and discomfort have been reported.1,2 Elec- oral function, including chewing, swallowing, trocautery and a hot glass tip of dental diodes may leave a fairly substantial speaking, and breathing.5,6 Camacho et al.7 zone of thermal tissue change3 and may result in delayed healing.
    [Show full text]
  • Six Steps to the “Perfect” Lip Deborah S
    September 2012 1081 Volume 11 • Issue 9 Copyright © 2012 ORIGINAL ARTICLES Journal of Drugs in Dermatology SPECIAL TOPIC Six Steps to the “Perfect” Lip Deborah S. Sarnoff MD FAAD FACPa and Robert H. Gotkin MD FACSb,c aRonald O. Perelman Department of Dermatology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY bLenox Hill Hospital—Manhattan Eye, Ear & Throat Institute, New York, NY cNorth Shore—LIJ Health Systems, Manhasset, NY ABSTRACT Full lips have always been associated with youth and beauty. Because of this, lip enhancement is one of the most frequently re- quested procedures in a cosmetic practice. For novice injectors, we recommend hyaluronic acid (HA) as the filler of choice. There is no skin test required; it is an easily obtainable, “off-the-shelf” product that is natural feeling when skillfully implanted in the soft tissues. Hyaluronic acid is easily reversible with hyaluronidase and, therefore, has an excellent safety profile. While Restylane® is the only FDA-approved HA filler with a specific indication for lip augmentation, one can use the following HA products off-label: Juvéderm® Ultra, Juvéderm Ultra Plus, Juvéderm Ultra XC, Juvéderm Ultra PLUS XC, Restylane-L®, Perlane®, Perlane-L®, and Belotero®. We present our six steps to achieve aesthetically pleasing augmented lips. While there is no single prescription for a “perfect” lip, nor a “one size fits all” approach for lip augmentation, these 6 steps can be used as a basic template for achieving a natural look. For more comprehensive, global perioral rejuvenation, our 6-step technique can be combined with the injection of neuromodulating agents and fractional laser skin resurfacing during the same treatment session.
    [Show full text]
  • Tonsillotomy (Partial) and Complete Tonsillectomy
    OPEN ACCESS ATLAS OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY, HEAD & NECK OPERATIVE SURGERY TONSILLOTOMY (PARTIAL) & COMPLETE TONSILLECTOMY - SURGICAL TECHNIQUE Klaus Stelter and Goetz Lehnerdt Acute tonsillitis is treated with steroids e.g. first and easiest-to-reach station of the dexamethasone, NSAIDs e.g. ibuprofen and mucosa associated lymphoid tissue system beta-lactam antibiotics e.g. penicillin or cef- (MALT) 2-4. As the main phase of the im- uroxime. Only 10 days of antibiotic therapy mune acquisition continues until the age of has proven to be effective to prevent rheu- 6yrs, the palatine tonsils are physiological- matic fever and glomerulonephritis. ly hyperplastic at this time 5, 6. This is followed by involution, which is reflected Tonsillectomy is only done for recurrent by regression of tonsil size until age 12yrs acute bacterial tonsillitis, or for noninfec- 7. tious reasons such as suspected neoplasia. The lymphoid tissue is separated by a cap- Partial tonsillectomy (tonsillotomy) is the sule from the surrounding muscle (superior 1st line treatment for snoring due to tonsillar pharyngeal constrictor) 8. The blood supply hyperplasia. It is low-risk, and postopera- originates from four different vessels, the tive pain and risk of haemorrhage are much lingual artery, the ascending pharyngeal less than with tonsillectomy. It is immate- artery and the ascending and descending rial whether the tonsillotomy is done with palatine arteries. These vessels radiate laser, radiofrequency, shaver, coblation, bi- mainly to the upper and lower tonsillar polar scissors or monopolar electrocautery, poles, as well as to the centre of the tonsil as long as the crypts remain open and some from laterally 9.
    [Show full text]
  • Macroanatomical Investigations on the Oral Cavity of Male Porcupines (Hystrix Cristata)
    Walaa Fadil Obead et al /J. Pharm. Sci. & Res. Vol. 10(3), 2018, 623-626 Macroanatomical investigations on the oral cavity of male Porcupines (Hystrix cristata) Walaa Fadil Obead1, Abdularazzaq baqer kadhim2 , fatimha Swadi zghair2 1Department of Anatomy and Histology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine'' University of Kerbala, Iraq. 2Division of Anatomy and Histology'', Faculty of Veterinary Medicine'' University of Qadysiah, Iraq. Abstract: ''Six adult males hystrix crestate was utilizes to decide the district anatomy of their mouth. The mouth was the advent via disjunct the temporo-mandibular united and the topographically and Morphometric tagged of the tongue, cheek pouch, major salivary glands, palate, lips and teeth were studied. The upper flange discovered a philtrum rollover from ''the median bulkhead of the nostrils and terminating at the oral chapping in a dissimilarity triangle to depiction the elongated incisors''. The lower flange bent a smooth arch ventral to the upper flange. A standard number of jagged Palatine ridges are eight. Histological appearance of the tongue was confirmed after staining of the eosin and the haematoxylin. The parotid, the mandibular, and the sublingual are major salivary glands were well developed''. This labor information baseline investigates data on the anatomy of the Hystrix cristata mouth and will have usefulness informative the adaptive appearance in this rodent to its lifestyle, habitat and diet. Keyword: Oral cavity, Tongue, Salivary gland, Palate, Hystrix crestate. INTRODUCTION sublingual organs be inverse and fine urbanized.'' (9, 10).The aim ''Rodents include main and the majority varied collection of of the study anatomy and histology of oral cavity of porcupian. mammals through over 1700 dissimilar types (1).
    [Show full text]
  • The Myloglossus in a Human Cadaver Study: Common Or Uncommon Anatomical Structure? B
    Folia Morphol. Vol. 76, No. 1, pp. 74–81 DOI: 10.5603/FM.a2016.0044 O R I G I N A L A R T I C L E Copyright © 2017 Via Medica ISSN 0015–5659 www.fm.viamedica.pl The myloglossus in a human cadaver study: common or uncommon anatomical structure? B. Buffoli*, M. Ferrari*, F. Belotti, D. Lancini, M.A. Cocchi, M. Labanca, M. Tschabitscher, R. Rezzani, L.F. Rodella Section of Anatomy and Physiopathology, Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy [Received: 1 June 2016; Accepted: 18 July 2016] Background: Additional extrinsic muscles of the tongue are reported in literature and one of them is the myloglossus muscle (MGM). Since MGM is nowadays considered as anatomical variant, the aim of this study is to clarify some open questions by evaluating and describing the myloglossal anatomy (including both MGM and its ligamentous counterpart) during human cadaver dissections. Materials and methods: Twenty-one regions (including masticator space, sublin- gual space and adjacent areas) were dissected and the presence and appearance of myloglossus were considered, together with its proximal and distal insertions, vascularisation and innervation. Results: The myloglossus was present in 61.9% of cases with muscular, ligamen- tous or mixed appearance and either bony or muscular insertion. Facial artery pro- vided myloglossal vascularisation in the 84.62% and lingual artery in the 15.38%; innervation was granted by the trigeminal system (buccal nerve and mylohyoid nerve), sometimes (46.15%) with hypoglossal component. Conclusions: These data suggest us to not consider myloglossus as a rare ana- tomical variant.
    [Show full text]
  • Read Full Article
    PEDIATRIC/CRANIOFACIAL Pharyngeal Flap Outcomes in Nonsyndromic Children with Repaired Cleft Palate and Velopharyngeal Insufficiency Stephen R. Sullivan, M.D., Background: Velopharyngeal insufficiency occurs in 5 to 20 percent of children M.P.H. following repair of a cleft palate. The pharyngeal flap is the traditional secondary Eileen M. Marrinan, M.S., procedure for correcting velopharyngeal insufficiency; however, because of M.P.H. perceived complications, alternative techniques have become popular. The John B. Mulliken, M.D. authors’ purpose was to assess a single surgeon’s long-term experience with a Boston, Mass.; and Syracuse, N.Y. tailored superiorly based pharyngeal flap to correct velopharyngeal insufficiency in nonsyndromic patients with a repaired cleft palate. Methods: The authors reviewed the records of all children who underwent a pharyngeal flap performed by the senior author (J.B.M.) between 1981 and 2008. The authors evaluated age of repair, perceptual speech outcome, need for a secondary operation, and complications. Success was defined as normal or borderline sufficient velopharyngeal function. Failure was defined as borderline insufficiency or severe velopharyngeal insufficiency with recommendation for another procedure. Results: The authors identified 104 nonsyndromic patients who required a pharyngeal flap following cleft palate repair. The mean age at pharyngeal flap surgery was 8.6 Ϯ 4.9 years. Postoperative speech results were available for 79 patients. Operative success with normal or borderline sufficient velopharyngeal function was achieved in 77 patients (97 percent). Obstructive sleep apnea was documented in two patients. Conclusion: The tailored superiorly based pharyngeal flap is highly successful in correcting velopharyngeal insufficiency, with a low risk of complication, in non- syndromic patients with repaired cleft palate.
    [Show full text]
  • Core Curriculum for Surgical Technology Sixth Edition
    Core Curriculum for Surgical Technology Sixth Edition Core Curriculum 6.indd 1 11/17/10 11:51 PM TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Healthcare sciences A. Anatomy and physiology 7 B. Pharmacology and anesthesia 37 C. Medical terminology 49 D. Microbiology 63 E. Pathophysiology 71 II. Technological sciences A. Electricity 85 B. Information technology 86 C. Robotics 88 III. Patient care concepts A. Biopsychosocial needs of the patient 91 B. Death and dying 92 IV. Surgical technology A. Preoperative 1. Non-sterile a. Attire 97 b. Preoperative physical preparation of the patient 98 c. tneitaP noitacifitnedi 99 d. Transportation 100 e. Review of the chart 101 f. Surgical consent 102 g. refsnarT 104 h. Positioning 105 i. Urinary catheterization 106 j. Skin preparation 108 k. Equipment 110 l. Instrumentation 112 2. Sterile a. Asepsis and sterile technique 113 b. Hand hygiene and surgical scrub 115 c. Gowning and gloving 116 d. Surgical counts 117 e. Draping 118 B. Intraoperative: Sterile 1. Specimen care 119 2. Abdominal incisions 121 3. Hemostasis 122 4. Exposure 123 5. Catheters and drains 124 6. Wound closure 128 7. Surgical dressings 137 8. Wound healing 140 1 c. Light regulation d. Photoreceptors e. Macula lutea f. Fovea centralis g. Optic disc h. Brain pathways C. Ear 1. Anatomy a. External ear (1) Auricle (pinna) (2) Tragus b. Middle ear (1) Ossicles (a) Malleus (b) Incus (c) Stapes (2) Oval window (3) Round window (4) Mastoid sinus (5) Eustachian tube c. Internal ear (1) Labyrinth (2) Cochlea 2. Physiology of hearing a. Sound wave reception b. Bone conduction c.
    [Show full text]
  • Surgical Treatments for Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA) Policy Number: PG0056 ADVANTAGE | ELITE | HMO Last Review: 06/01/2021
    Surgical Treatments for Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA) Policy Number: PG0056 ADVANTAGE | ELITE | HMO Last Review: 06/01/2021 INDIVIDUAL MARKETPLACE | PROMEDICA MEDICARE PLAN | PPO GUIDELINES This policy does not certify benefits or authorization of benefits, which is designated by each individual policyholder terms, conditions, exclusions and limitations contract. It does not constitute a contract or guarantee regarding coverage or reimbursement/payment. Self-Insured group specific policy will supersede this general policy when group supplementary plan document or individual plan decision directs otherwise. Paramount applies coding edits to all medical claims through coding logic software to evaluate the accuracy and adherence to accepted national standards. This medical policy is solely for guiding medical necessity and explaining correct procedure reporting used to assist in making coverage decisions and administering benefits. SCOPE X Professional _ Facility DESCRIPTION Sleep apnea is a disorder where breathing nearly or completely stops for periods of time during sleep. In obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), the brain sends the message to breathe, but there is a blockage to air flowing into the chest. It is a condition in which repetitive episodes of upper airway obstruction occur during sleep. The obstruction may be localized to one or two areas, or may encompass the entire upper airway passages to include the nasal cavity (nose), oropharynx (palate, tonsils, tonsillar pillars) and hypopharynx (tongue base). The hallmark symptom of OSA is excessive daytime sleepiness, and the typical clinical sign of OSA is snoring, which can abruptly cease and be followed by gasping associated with a brief arousal from sleep. The snoring resumes when the patient falls back to sleep, and the cycle of snoring/apnea/arousal may be repeated as frequently as every minute throughout the night.
    [Show full text]
  • Oral-Peripheral Examination
    Oral-Peripheral Examination SCSD 632 Week 2 Phonological Disorders 3. General Cautions Relating to the Oral-Peripheral Examination a. Use your initial impressions of the child’s speech and facial characteristics to guide your examination. b. Remember that one facial or oral abnormality may be associated with others. c. If you suspect an abnormality in structure or function you may want to get a second opinion from a more experienced SLP or an SLP who specializes in craniofacial or motor-speech disorders before initiating referrals to other professionals. d. Remember that in the case of most “special” conditions, it is not your role to diagnose the condition; rather it is your responsibility to make appropriate referrals. e. Remember that in Canada you cannot usually refer directly to a specialist; be sensitive in your approach to the family doctor or referring physician. f. Be sensitive about how you present your results to parents, especially when you are recommending referrals to other professionals. The parents have the right to refuse the referral. g. An oral-peripheral examination is at least as important for your young patients as for your older patients. 1 Oral-Peripheral Examination | Oral and Facial Structure z Face z Lips z Teeth z Hard palate z Soft palate z Tongue When you perform an oral-peripheral examination what are you looking for when you examine each of the following structures? a. Facial Characteristics: overall expression and appearance, size, shape and overall symmetry of the head and facial structures b. Teeth: maxillary central incisors should extend just slightly over the mandibular central incisors; the lower canine tooth should be half-way between the upper lateral incisor and the upper canine tooth c.
    [Show full text]