Monograph of the North American Freshwater Fish Leeches (Oligochaeta: Hirudinida ; Piscicolidae) and Molecular Phylogeny of the Family Piscicolidae

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Monograph of the North American Freshwater Fish Leeches (Oligochaeta: Hirudinida ; Piscicolidae) and Molecular Phylogeny of the Family Piscicolidae W&M ScholarWorks Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects 2007 Monograph of the North American freshwater fish leeches (Oligochaeta: Hirudinida ; Piscicolidae) and molecular phylogeny of the family Piscicolidae Julianne I. Williams College of William and Mary - Virginia Institute of Marine Science Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/etd Part of the Genetics Commons, and the Zoology Commons Recommended Citation Williams, Julianne I., "Monograph of the North American freshwater fish leeches (Oligochaeta: Hirudinida ; Piscicolidae) and molecular phylogeny of the family Piscicolidae" (2007). Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects. Paper 1539616905. https://dx.doi.org/doi:10.25773/v5-2fh1-ex38 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. MONOGRAPH OF THE NORTH AMERICAN FRESHWATER FISH LEECHES (OLIGOCHAETA: HIRUDINIDA: PISCICOLIDAE) AND MOLECULAR PHYLOGENY OF THE FAMILY PISCICOLIDAE A Dissertation Presented to The Faculty of the School of Marine Science The College of William and Mary in Virginia In partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Julianne I. Williams 2007 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. APPROVAL SHEET This dissertation is submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Alf\ Julianne I. Williams Approved, February 2007 £ U i. Eugene Burreson, Ph.D. Committee Chairman/ Advisor •lney, Ph.D. Kimberly Reece, Ph.D. MarVSiddall, Ph.D. American Museum of Natural History New York, New York Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEDGMENTS............................................................................................................v LIST OF TABLES...................................................................................................................... vii LIST OF FIGURES................................................................................................................... viii ABSTRACT...............................................................................................................................xiii CHAPTER 1: OVERVIEW......................................................................................................... 2 Biology ............................................................................................................................... 3 Anatomy of piscicolid leeches ........................................................................................4 North America taxonomy ................ ; ...........................................................................10 Higher level taxonomy ................................................................................................... 15 CHAPTER 2: MOLECULAR AND MORPHOLOGICAL PHYLOGENY OF THE FAMILY PISCICOLIDAE.........................................................................................................19 Materials and methods ................................................................................................... 19 Results.............................................................................................................................. 30 Discussion ........................................................................................................................34 CHAPTER 3: MONOGRAPH OF THE NORTH AMERICAN FRESHWATER FISH LEECHES.................................................................................................................................... 44 Materials and methods ...................................................................................................44 Cystobranchus.................................................................................................................46 Cystobranchus verrilli......................................................................................47 Gonimosobdella.........................................................................................................................51 iii Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Page Gonimosobdella klemmi................................................................................... 54 Gonimosobdella mammillata.......................................................................... 62 Gonimosobdella meyeri................................................................................... 69 Gonimosobdella salmositica............................................................................76 Gonimosobdella virginica................................................................................ 84 Myzobdella...................................................................................................................... 92 Myzobdella lugubris..........................................................................................94 Myzobdella patzcuarensis.............................................................................. 105 Myzobdella reducta......................................................................................... 110 Piscicola.........................................................................................................................117 Piscicola milneri..............................................................................................119 Piscicola punctata........................................................................................... 127 CHAPTER 4: SUMMARY..................................................................................................... 135 DISCLAIMER........................................................................................................................... 137 LITERATURE CITED.............................................................................................................138 VITA............................................................................................................................................147 iv Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I thank the following people for assistance in collecting specimens: Toby Bolton, Lincoln Marine Science Centre, South Australia for Austrobdella translucens\ Donald Buth, University of California at Losa Angeles (UCLA) for Malmiana buthr, Janine Caira, University of Connecticut for Pterobdella amara from Australia and Zeylanicobdella arugamensis and Branchellion sp. from Borneo; Steve Coles, Bishop Museum, Hawaii for Stibarobdella macrothela', Ross Daley, CSIRO, Hobart, Tasmania for Stibarobdella tasmanica ; Bill Font, Southeastern Louisiana University for Myzobdella lugubris and Aestabdella abditovesiculata from Hawaii; Jim Gartland and the trawl survey, VIMS for Aestabdella leiostomr, Dave Gauthier, VIMS for Stibarobdella macrothela from Virginia; Simon Jones, Pacific Biological Station, Department of Fisheries and Oceans, Vancouver, BC, Canada for assistance in collecting Cystobranchus salmositicus\ Julianne Kalman, UCLA for Austrobdella californiana; Egil Karlsbakk, University of Bergen, Norway for Platybdella anarrhichae and Calliobdella lophir, Rasul Khan, Memorial University of Newfoundland, Canada for Johanssonia arctica\ Kristen Kuhn, University of Delaware for Notobdella nototheniae from subAntarctic islands; Sarah Muffelman, VIMS for Myzobdella lugubris from Virginia estuaries; Jack Musick and the 2004 Ichthyology class, VIMS for assistance in collecting Myzobdella lugubris from freshwater; Robert Olson, Hatfield Marine Science Center, Oregon State University for Branchellion lobata and for assistance in collecting Aestabdella abditovesiculata and Malmiana virida from Oregon; Michel Segonzac, IFREMER, France for Bathybdella sawyerr, Mark Siddall, American Museum of Natural History, New York for Stibarobdella macrothela from Heron Island, Australia and Branchellion ravenellir, Michele Treloar, CSIRO, Hobart, Tasmania for Austrobdella bilobata\ and Serge Utevsky, V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, Ukraine for Piscicola geometra. I owe special thanks to Weldon Newton, Lac en Coeur, Quebec, Canada for noticing leeches on lake trout and contacting my advisor about their identity. He subsequently invited us to stay at his cottage and took us fishing v Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. to collect live specimens. Without his curiosity and gracious hospitality, and that of the entire Lac en Coeur community, we would not have been able to solve the P. geometra/P. milneri identification issue. I thank Bill Moser of the Smithsonian National Museum of Natural History for help with specimen loans, depositing of specimens, and searching for rare literature. I thank Jean-Marc Gagnon for allowing me to examine specimens of Piscicola at the Canadian Museum of Nature, Ottawa, Canada. I thank Kim Reece, Nancy Stokes, Mark Siddall, Elizabeth Borda, Rebecca Budinoff, Rita Crockett, and Susan Denny for essential help with sequencing and sectioning. I thank
Recommended publications
  • Research Article Genetic Diversity of Freshwater Leeches in Lake Gusinoe (Eastern Siberia, Russia)
    Hindawi Publishing Corporation e Scientific World Journal Volume 2014, Article ID 619127, 11 pages http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/619127 Research Article Genetic Diversity of Freshwater Leeches in Lake Gusinoe (Eastern Siberia, Russia) Irina A. Kaygorodova,1 Nadezhda Mandzyak,1 Ekaterina Petryaeva,1,2 and Nikolay M. Pronin3 1 Limnological Institute, 3 Ulan-Batorskaja Street, Irkutsk 664033, Russia 2 Irkutsk State University, 5 Sukhe-Bator Street, Irkutsk 664003, Russia 3 Institute of General and Experimental Biology, 6 Sakhyanova Street, Ulan-Ude 670047, Russia Correspondence should be addressed to Irina A. Kaygorodova; [email protected] Received 30 July 2014; Revised 7 November 2014; Accepted 7 November 2014; Published 27 November 2014 Academic Editor: Rafael Toledo Copyright © 2014 Irina A. Kaygorodova et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The study of leeches from Lake Gusinoe and its adjacent area offered us the possibility to determine species diversity. Asa result, an updated species list of the Gusinoe Hirudinea fauna (Annelida, Clitellata) has been compiled. There are two orders and three families of leeches in the Gusinoe area: order Rhynchobdellida (families Glossiphoniidae and Piscicolidae) and order Arhynchobdellida (family Erpobdellidae). In total, 6 leech species belonging to 6 genera have been identified. Of these, 3 taxa belonging to the family Glossiphoniidae (Alboglossiphonia heteroclita f. papillosa, Hemiclepsis marginata,andHelobdella stagnalis) and representatives of 3 unidentified species (Glossiphonia sp., Piscicola sp., and Erpobdella sp.) have been recorded. The checklist gives a contemporary overview of the species composition of leeches and information on their hosts or substrates.
    [Show full text]
  • Review and Meta-Analysis of the Environmental Biology and Potential Invasiveness of a Poorly-Studied Cyprinid, the Ide Leuciscus Idus
    REVIEWS IN FISHERIES SCIENCE & AQUACULTURE https://doi.org/10.1080/23308249.2020.1822280 REVIEW Review and Meta-Analysis of the Environmental Biology and Potential Invasiveness of a Poorly-Studied Cyprinid, the Ide Leuciscus idus Mehis Rohtlaa,b, Lorenzo Vilizzic, Vladimır Kovacd, David Almeidae, Bernice Brewsterf, J. Robert Brittong, Łukasz Głowackic, Michael J. Godardh,i, Ruth Kirkf, Sarah Nienhuisj, Karin H. Olssonh,k, Jan Simonsenl, Michał E. Skora m, Saulius Stakenas_ n, Ali Serhan Tarkanc,o, Nildeniz Topo, Hugo Verreyckenp, Grzegorz ZieRbac, and Gordon H. Coppc,h,q aEstonian Marine Institute, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia; bInstitute of Marine Research, Austevoll Research Station, Storebø, Norway; cDepartment of Ecology and Vertebrate Zoology, Faculty of Biology and Environmental Protection, University of Lodz, Łod z, Poland; dDepartment of Ecology, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Comenius University, Bratislava, Slovakia; eDepartment of Basic Medical Sciences, USP-CEU University, Madrid, Spain; fMolecular Parasitology Laboratory, School of Life Sciences, Pharmacy and Chemistry, Kingston University, Kingston-upon-Thames, Surrey, UK; gDepartment of Life and Environmental Sciences, Bournemouth University, Dorset, UK; hCentre for Environment, Fisheries & Aquaculture Science, Lowestoft, Suffolk, UK; iAECOM, Kitchener, Ontario, Canada; jOntario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry, Peterborough, Ontario, Canada; kDepartment of Zoology, Tel Aviv University and Inter-University Institute for Marine Sciences in Eilat, Tel Aviv,
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Conditions Influencing the Leech Infestation by Myzobdella
    Environmental conditions influencing the leech infestation by Myzobdella platensis (Hirudinea: Piscicolidae) on the swimming crabs (Callinectes spp.) (Decapoda: Portunidae) in a Brazilian tropical estuary EVANDRO SEVERINO-RODRIGUES & LUIS FELIPE DE ALMEIDA DUARTE* Instituto de Pesca (APTA/SAA/SP), Av. Bartolomeu de Gusmão, 192, 11030-906, Santos, SP, Brazil. Tel: +55 (13) 3261-2342. * Corresponding author: [email protected] Abstract. There is a global lack in the literature on the studies of parasitism in tropical estuaries, particularly about the effects of estuarine conditions on the parasite population dynamics among the crustacean hosts. Here, we evaluate whether the environment conditions and biotic factors could influence the infestation by Myzobdella platensis in swimming crabs (genus Callinectes) captured in a Brazilian estuarine system. We collected a total of 1,097 crabs, and records the physical-chemical parameters monthly for two years at three sites in the estuary to analysis the effect of estuarine conditions (i.e. depth, floor temperature, dissolved oxygen, and salinity). There were cocoon and leeches feeding effectively on swimming crabs’ hemolymph in the three species studied between the sexes, years, and at the three study sites. The study reveals a large infestation for C. bocourti with a prevalence of 91.5% by leeches and of 96.0% by cocoon, and 87.5% by leeches and of 90.2% by cocoon to C. sapidus, while for C. danae it was lower with 26.2% by leeches and 32.6% by cocoon, respectively. We did not observe neither leeches and nor cocoon in crabs smaller than 7.0 cm. Salinity and dissolved oxygen seem to have inverse correlation with infestations probably due to the higher sensitivity of the parasite to these parameters.
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Confirmation of the North American Leech Placobdella Ornata (Verrill, 1872) (Hirudinida: Glossiphoniidae) in Europe
    BioInvasions Records (2015) Volume 4, Issue 3: 185–188 Open Access doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3391/bir.2015.4.3.05 © 2015 The Author(s). Journal compilation © 2015 REABIC Rapid Communication Molecular confirmation of the North American leech Placobdella ornata (Verrill, 1872) (Hirudinida: Glossiphoniidae) in Europe Jan Soors1*, Joost Mertens2, William E. Moser3, Dennis J. Richardson4, Charlotte I. Hammond4 and Eric A. Lazo-Wasem5 1Research Institute for Nature and Forest, Kliniekstraat 25, 1070 Brussels, Belgium 2Vlaamse Milieumaatschappij (VMM), Raymonde de Larochelaan 1, 9051 Sint-Denijs-Westrem, Belgium 3Smithsonian Institution, National Museum of Natural History, Department of Invertebrate Zoology, Museum Support Center MRC 534, 4210 Silver Hill Road, Suitland, MD 20746 USA 4School of Biological Sciences, Quinnipiac University, 275 Mt. Carmel Avenue, Hamden, Connecticut 06518 USA 5Division of Invertebrate Zoology, Peabody Museum of Natural History, Yale University, P.O. Box 208118, New Haven, Connecticut 06520 USA E-mail: [email protected] (JS), [email protected] (JM), [email protected] (WEM), [email protected] (DJR), [email protected] (CIH), [email protected] (EALW) *Corresponding author Received: 28 January 2015 / Accepted: 15 May 2015 / Published online: 12 June 2015 Handling editor: Vadim Panov Abstract Specimens of the North American leech, Placobdella ornata (Verrill, 1872) were confirmed from the Donkmeer, a freshwater lake in the province of East Flanders, Belgium, by morphological and molecular analysis. Leech specimens from Belgium were morphologically consistent with the syntype series and description of P. ornata by Verrill (1872). Molecular comparison of the Belgian specimens to specimens of P. ornata from the type locality (New Haven, Connecticut, USA) using the cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) gene revealed a similarity of 99.5%.
    [Show full text]
  • Parasites and Their Freshwater Fish Host
    Bio-Research, 6(1): 328 – 338 328 Parasites and their Freshwater Fish Host Iyaji, F. O. and Eyo, J. E. Department of Zoology, University of Nigeria, Nsukka, Enugu State, Nigeria Corresponding author: Eyo, J. E. Department of Zoology, University of Nigeria, Nsukka, Enugu State, Nigeria. Email: [email protected] Phone: +234(0)8026212686 Abstract This study reviews the effects of parasites of fresh water fish hosts. Like other living organisms, fish harbour parasites either external or internal which cause a host of pathological debilities in them. The parasites live in close obligate association and derive benefits such as nutrition at the host’s expense, usually without killing the host. They utililize energy otherwise available for the hosts growth, sustenance, development, establishment and reproduction and as such may harm their hosts in a number of ways and affect fish production. The common parasites of fishes include the unicellular microparasites (viruses, bacteria, fungi and protozoans). The protozoans i.e. microsporidians and mixozoans are considered in this review. The multicellular macroparasites mainly comprised of the helminthes and arthropods are also highlighted. The effects of parasites on their fish hosts maybe exacerbated by different pollutants including heavy metals and hydrocarbons, organic enrichment of sediments by domestic sewage and others such as parasite life cycles and fish population size. Keywords: Parasites, Helminths, Protozoans, Microparasites, Macroparasites, Debilities, Freshwater fish Introduction the flagellates have direct life cycles and affect especially the pond reared fish populations. Several studies have revealed rich parasitic fauna Microsporidians are obligate intracellular parasites in freshwater fishes (Onyia, 1970; Kennedy et al., that require host tissues for reproduction (FAO, 1986; Ugwuzor, 1987; Onwuliri and Mgbemena, 1996).
    [Show full text]
  • Checklists of Parasites of Fishes of Salah Al-Din Province, Iraq
    Vol. 2 (2): 180-218, 2018 Checklists of Parasites of Fishes of Salah Al-Din Province, Iraq Furhan T. Mhaisen1*, Kefah N. Abdul-Ameer2 & Zeyad K. Hamdan3 1Tegnervägen 6B, 641 36 Katrineholm, Sweden 2Department of Biology, College of Education for Pure Science, University of Baghdad, Iraq 3Department of Biology, College of Education for Pure Science, University of Tikrit, Iraq *Corresponding author: [email protected] Abstract: Literature reviews of reports concerning the parasitic fauna of fishes of Salah Al-Din province, Iraq till the end of 2017 showed that a total of 115 parasite species are so far known from 25 valid fish species investigated for parasitic infections. The parasitic fauna included two myzozoans, one choanozoan, seven ciliophorans, 24 myxozoans, eight trematodes, 34 monogeneans, 12 cestodes, 11 nematodes, five acanthocephalans, two annelids and nine crustaceans. The infection with some trematodes and nematodes occurred with larval stages, while the remaining infections were either with trophozoites or adult parasites. Among the inspected fishes, Cyprinion macrostomum was infected with the highest number of parasite species (29 parasite species), followed by Carasobarbus luteus (26 species) and Arabibarbus grypus (22 species) while six fish species (Alburnus caeruleus, A. sellal, Barbus lacerta, Cyprinion kais, Hemigrammocapoeta elegans and Mastacembelus mastacembelus) were infected with only one parasite species each. The myxozoan Myxobolus oviformis was the commonest parasite species as it was reported from 10 fish species, followed by both the myxozoan M. pfeifferi and the trematode Ascocotyle coleostoma which were reported from eight fish host species each and then by both the cestode Schyzocotyle acheilognathi and the nematode Contracaecum sp.
    [Show full text]
  • Arhynchobdellida (Annelida: Oligochaeta: Hirudinida): Phylogenetic Relationships and Evolution
    MOLECULAR PHYLOGENETICS AND EVOLUTION Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 30 (2004) 213–225 www.elsevier.com/locate/ympev Arhynchobdellida (Annelida: Oligochaeta: Hirudinida): phylogenetic relationships and evolution Elizabeth Bordaa,b,* and Mark E. Siddallb a Department of Biology, Graduate School and University Center, City University of New York, New York, NY, USA b Division of Invertebrate Zoology, American Museum of Natural History, New York, NY, USA Received 15 July 2003; revised 29 August 2003 Abstract A remarkable diversity of life history strategies, geographic distributions, and morphological characters provide a rich substrate for investigating the evolutionary relationships of arhynchobdellid leeches. The phylogenetic relationships, using parsimony anal- ysis, of the order Arhynchobdellida were investigated using nuclear 18S and 28S rDNA, mitochondrial 12S rDNA, and cytochrome c oxidase subunit I sequence data, as well as 24 morphological characters. Thirty-nine arhynchobdellid species were selected to represent the seven currently recognized families. Sixteen rhynchobdellid leeches from the families Glossiphoniidae and Piscicolidae were included as outgroup taxa. Analysis of all available data resolved a single most-parsimonious tree. The cladogram conflicted with most of the traditional classification schemes of the Arhynchobdellida. Monophyly of the Erpobdelliformes and Hirudini- formes was supported, whereas the families Haemadipsidae, Haemopidae, and Hirudinidae, as well as the genera Hirudo or Ali- olimnatis, were found not to be monophyletic. The results provide insight on the phylogenetic positions for the taxonomically problematic families Americobdellidae and Cylicobdellidae, the genera Semiscolex, Patagoniobdella, and Mesobdella, as well as genera traditionally classified under Hirudinidae. The evolution of dietary and habitat preferences is examined. Ó 2003 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
    [Show full text]
  • The Leeches (Hirudinea) of the "Karas Lake" Reserve in Poland
    ©Erik Mauch Verlag, Dinkelscherben, Deutschland,33 Download unter www.biologiezentrum.at Lauterbornia 52: 33-38, D-86424 Dinkelscherben, 2004-12-30 The leeches (Hirudinea) of the "Karas Lake" reserve in Poland Aleksander Bielecki, Adam Jawniak and Joanna Kalinowska With 3 figures and 1 table Keywords: Hirudinea, Karas Lake, Polen, reserve, dominance, faunistics Schlagwörter: Hirudinea, Karas, Polen, Dominanz, Faunistik During research on the "Karas Lake" reserve, 16 species of leeches were found and described here, inclusive of the very rare taxaBatracobdelloides moogi, Boreobdella verrucata, Piscicola borow ieci and Piscicola pojmanskae. 1 Introduction The studies began in 2002 in the "Karas Lake" reserve in Poland (Fig. 3). The aim of this investigation was to recognize the quantitative and qualitative com­ munities of leeches in the reserve. "Karas Lake" is the shallow and eutrophic basin in the ending stage of the land-forming process. Prevailing winds from the West and North cause organic matter deposition mainly on the windward side of the lake. There are intensive peat-forming processes on this side of the lake and, as a result, these have formed a wide peat bog. There is mineral-organic soil on the southeast side of the lake, where the floral zones are wide and surface water occurs only in the spring (Krupa & al. 2000). 2 Material and methods The study was conducted between 20 April and 30 July 2002. The material was collected from plants, mainly from Typha latifolia and from the sticks driven into the bottom. In next part of the study, material was collected for conserva­ tion. Leech preservation is difficult, and for measurements and dissection the leeches should be extended and not twisted.
    [Show full text]
  • Occasional Papers
    NUMBER 69, 55 pages 25 March 2002 BISHOP MUSEUM OCCASIONAL PAPERS RECORDS OF THE HAWAII BIOLOGICAL SURVEY FOR 2000 PART 2: NOTES NEAL L. EVENHUIS AND LUCIUS G. ELDREDGE, EDITORS BISHOP MUSEUM PRESS HONOLULU C Printed on recycled paper Cover: Metrosideros polymorpha, native ‘öhi‘a lehua. Photo: Clyde T. Imada. Research publications of Bishop Museum are issued irregularly in the RESEARCH following active series: • Bishop Museum Occasional Papers. A series of short papers PUBLICATIONS OF describing original research in the natural and cultural sciences. Publications containing larger, monographic works are issued in BISHOP MUSEUM five areas: • Bishop Museum Bulletins in Anthropology • Bishop Museum Bulletins in Botany • Bishop Museum Bulletins in Entomology • Bishop Museum Bulletins in Zoology • Pacific Anthropological Reports Institutions and individuals may subscribe to any of the above or pur- chase separate publications from Bishop Museum Press, 1525 Bernice Street, Honolulu, Hawai‘i 96817-0916, USA. Phone: (808) 848-4135; fax: (808) 848-4132; email: [email protected]. The Museum also publishes Bishop Museum Technical Reports, a series containing information relative to scholarly research and collections activities. Issue is authorized by the Museum’s Scientific Publications Committee, but manuscripts do not necessarily receive peer review and are not intended as formal publications. Institutional libraries interested in exchanging publications should write to: Library Exchange Program, Bishop Museum Library, 1525 Bernice Street,
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Pond-Breeding of Cyprinids in Sweden and Finland
    CHAPTER 4 Historical Pond-Breeding of Cyprinids in Sweden and Finland Madeleine Bonow and Ingvar Svanberg This chapter describes and analyses the history of pond-breeding of fish in Sweden and Finland (which was an integral part of Sweden until 1809) from late medieval times until around 1900.1 Very little is known about the history of aquaculture in Sweden and Finland. Most published overviews are superficial. There are very few studies based on sources and hardly anything has been written by historians using modern methods and source criticism. We are therefore uncovering a long, although now broken, tradetion of fish cultivation in ponds which has left scant traces in the written record or the physical environment. We need to make some clear distinctions about types of aquaculture since much confusion arises from writers not differentiating among natural fish populations in natural or artificial ponds, unselective capture for stocking or storage of wild fish, selective stock and grow operations, and human management of breeding and species-specific stocking and artificial feeding or nutrient management. We deal mainly with the last case. We do not include marine aquaculture, which is a very recent phenomenon in Scandinavia. The overall purpose of our chapter is to discuss how fish kept in fishponds have been introduced, farmed and spread in Sweden and Finland in early 1 This chapter was written as part of “The story of Crucian carp (Carassius carassius) in the Baltic Sea region: history and a possible future” led by Professor Håkan Olsén at Södertörn University (Sweden) and funded by the Baltic Sea Foundation.
    [Show full text]
  • The Invasion of the Leech Piscicola Respirans (Hirudinea: Piscicolidae
    Biologia 66/2: 294—298, 2011 Section Zoology DOI: 10.2478/s11756-011-0019-0 TheinvasionoftheleechPiscicola respirans (Hirudinea: Piscicolidae) on the fins of European grayling Thymallus thymallus Aleksander Bielecki1, Joanna M. Cichocka1,JanuszTerlecki2 & Andrzej Witkowski3 1Department of Zoology, University of Warmia and Mazury, Oczapowskiego St. 5, 10-718 Olsztyn, Poland; e-mail: [email protected] 2Department of Applied Ecology, University of Warmia and Mazury, Oczapowskiego St. 5, 10-718 Olsztyn, Poland 3Museum of Natural History, Wroclaw University, Sienkiewicza St. 21, 50-335 Wroclaw, Poland Abstract: This study presents the parasitical relationships between the leech Piscicola respirans and European grayling Thymallus thymallus. It determines leech invasion intensity and extensity as well as describes the preferences of fin selection by the parasite as a place to attach and feed. It also shows the significance of fin selection by the leech in the initial phase of life cycle. Finally, the study defines P. respirans as a predominantly fin-parasite of fishes. Most probably the host-searching mechanism is based on positive phototaxis. Key words: leech; Hirudinea; Piscicolidae; European grayling Introduction fore using statistical analysis was not easy (Lestage 1936; Sitowski 1937; Epure 1945; Hoffman 1955a, b; Freshwater species of fish leeches (piscicolids), with Wojtas 1959; Bielecki 1977). a few exceptions, live in Holarctic continental waters Piscicola respirans always occurs on fishes in huge (Utevsky & Trontelj 2004; Utevsky 2007). Piscicolid amounts, resulting in economic losses. Moreover, par- leeches are parasites of many fish species (Sket & Tron- asite infestation discourages fishermen from catching telj 2008) although a few species also feed on crus- such infected fish (Bielecki 1977, fishermen’s oral in- taceans and octopus blood (Epshtein 1959; Burreson formation).
    [Show full text]
  • Parasites of the Common Carp Cyprinus Carpio L., 1758 (Teleostei: Cyprinidae) from Water Bodies of Turkey: Updated Checklist and Review for the 1964–2014 Period
    Turkish Journal of Zoology Turk J Zool (2015) 39: 545-554 http://journals.tubitak.gov.tr/zoology/ © TÜBİTAK Research Article doi:10.3906/zoo-1401-42 Parasites of the common carp Cyprinus carpio L., 1758 (Teleostei: Cyprinidae) from water bodies of Turkey: updated checklist and review for the 1964–2014 period 1, 1 2 Lorenzo VILIZZI *, Ali Serhan TARKAN , Fitnat Güler EKMEKÇİ 1 Faculty of Fisheries, Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University, Kötekli, Muğla, Turkey 2 Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey Received: 18.01.2014 Accepted/Published Online: 14.11.2014 Printed: 30.07.2015 Abstract: A synopsis is provided of the parasites of common carp Cyprinus carpio L. from water bodies of Turkey based on literature data from 1964 to 2014. In total, 45 studies were included in the review and these provided data from 41 water bodies, comprising 12 man-made reservoirs, 21 natural lakes, and 8 water courses. Forty-one different taxa (including molluscan Glochidium sp.) in total were recorded. Of these taxa, 2 had not been previously reviewed for Turkey, and 4 were excluded from the list because of dubious identification. The Turkish parasite fauna of common carp living under natural conditions was dominated by ciliates (Ciliophora) among the protozoans and by flatworms (Platyhelminthes) among the metazoans, and this was both in terms of occurrence on fish and across water bodies. The absence of 7 taxa from both the European and North American checklists can be explained by the location of Turkey at the frontier between Asia and Europe. Additionally, the parasite fauna of the common carp in Turkey was consistently different from that of the far eastern species’ specimens.
    [Show full text]