Bus Rapid Transit a Communiity Plan Y P Pl Nanplan

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Bus Rapid Transit a Communiity Plan Y P Pl Nanplan n j i t . busr rapid transit a communiityyp planpplplallaanan u t g e r s 1 n j i t . r u t g e r s 2 brt development partners principal investigators acknowledgements Darius Sollohub Michelle Alonso, City of Newark Perris Straughter, City of Newark Martin Robins Robert Altenkirch, NJIT Pratap Talwar, Thompson Design Group Zoe Baldwin, Tri State Transportation Campaign Georgeen Theodore, NJIT Monique Baptiste, La Casa de Don Pedro Adam Veneziano, Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority Bill Bishop, Technology Consultant Derek Ware, James Street Historic District research assistants Karen Burns, Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority Kathy Weaver, Newark Alliance Alasdair Cain, National Bus Rapid Transit Institute Tom Wright, Regional Plan Association Robert Pietrocola Richard Cammarieri, New Community Corporation Zemin Zhang, James Street Historic District Rachel Horwitz Will Carry, NJTRANSIT Susan Zielinski, University of Michigan John Cays, NJIT Jeff Zupan, Regional Plan Association Frederick Cooke, C+C Architecture Alex Dambach, City of Newark La Casa de Don Pedro Focus Group attendees, Urs Gauchat, NJIT December 1st, 2007 Gerard Noab, LISC of Greater Newark & Jersey City Jim Gilligan, NJTRANSIT Monique Baptiste James Greller, Hudson County Planning Kamely Bautista Toni Griffi n, City of Newark Frederick P. H. Cook Jack Kanarek, NJTRANSIT Pastor Lula Haas Paul Kaufman, STV Micheal Jordan Alfred Koeppe, Newark Alliance Elizabeth McGrady Linda Morgan, Cogswell Realty Edna Nampton Robin Murray, NJIT Anthony Nunez Eric Opie, NJIT Jal Nunez RJ Palladino, NJTRANSIT Justina Nunez Stefan Pryor, City of Newark Marcos Nunez Alle Ries, La Casa de Don Pedro Pedro Nunez Richard Roberts, NJTRANSIT Jonnie Rufus n Michael Salzman, NewWork Darlyn Santiago Tony Santos, NJIT JoAnn Sims j Suhaylah Shabazz, Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority Perris Straughter i t . r u t g e r s 1 table characteristics of brt introduction 3 what is brt? possible brt features for newark other brt systems 11 the case for newark typical riders smart growth destinations active communities comprehensive brt network 21 brt-oriented development springfi eld avenue orange street bloomfi eld avenue the airport station implementation 94 communities agencies governments n j funding sources i participants t glossary . references r u t g e r s 2 INTRODUCTION This document seeks to support the City of Newark and NJ TRANSIT in their effort to deploy Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) throughout Newark and its neighboring municipalities. It was written by faculty, staff and graduate students at both the New Jersey Institute of Technology and Rutgers University, and coordinates two years of academic research that included extensive community outreach, site visits, focus groups, design studios and other substantial efforts. Its publication is being fi nancially supported by members of the Newark Alliance with matching funds provided by the New Jersey Casino Reinvestment Development Authority. Its authors created it to communicate to all parties ranging from government offi cials to neighborhood residents. The report identifi es the best components that a Newark BRT should feature, where it should travel, hurdles that must be overcome for it to succeed, and the types of residential and commercial development BRT might foster. This effort continues the momentum generated by the launch of the Newark Vision Plan, organized by the Regional Plan Association and announced on the one hundredth day of Mayor Corey Booker’s administration. The Vision Plan led directly to NJ TRANSIT’S launch in April 2008 of the Go Bus, an enhanced bus service with many BRT features. The Liberty Corridor Project, a fully developed BRT that will pass through downtown Newark and connect Bloomfi eld to Newark Airport, will begin service in late 2009. With the correct guidance and community endorsement, these strong fi rst steps can ultimately lead to a fully developed BRT network throughout the City. A new transportation system in Newark can have a profound and positive impact and lay the foundation for the next generation of growth. With a new federal administration, these changes can begin sooner than expected. Newark is ready for BRT. The City is a major transportation hub with an extensive transit system in place. Over 40 bus routes carry a remarkable 205,000 passengers each day, and connect to the over 540 trains stopping at Newark’s Penn and Broad Street Stations. One of the primary advantages of deploying BRT in Newark today is the City’s urban pattern of broad streets that evolved around the trolley network of the last century. BRT can be deployed on these streets and reach most of the City without costly infrastructure changes or undue traffi c disruptions. Starting with Australia’s O-bahn Busway over 30 years ago, BRT has been implemented in many different countries and evolved into a system that offers a wide array of features. Transit providers today can select from these to create a unique system that suits local budgets, conditions and needs. Of the many systems studied, this report showcases Boston; Curitiba, Brazil; and Los Angeles because they offer important lessons for Newark. This report proposes a comprehensive BRT network for Newark that better connects it with its surrounding communities and integrates seamlessly with existing rail service. All lines would pass through a downtown zone defi ned by major BRT stations that would support the central business district. Lines in the southern part of the City would terminate at a newly developed BRT node at the Airport Station. BRT thrives when it is integrated with land use planning. To show how this might occur in Newark, this study showcases four sites and how they can develop around BRT. These sites are at Springfi eld Avenue and South 10th Street; the Orange Street Light Rail Station, the Bloomfi eld Avenue Light Rail Station, and the Train Station at Newark Airport. Each site proposes phased n development and projects fi scal impacts. j A fi nal section outlining implementation possibilities calls for leadership and coordination between three constituencies: communities, agencies and governments. A specifi c strategy for the i deployment of BRT is described in this section. t The Transportation Research Board suggests that BRT have “a quality image and unique identity.” In working with a host of different communities, from neighborhoods to business boardrooms . downtown, we heard one voice: BRT should be the best it can be and something that all the city’s residents can take pride in. These are the fundamental goals this report seeks to achieve. r u t g e r s 3 WHAT IS BRT? describe brt There are many ways to describe BRT. Here are three brt’s relation to bus and light rail defi nitions taken from leading research organizations: BRT combines the best features of the bus and light rail providing a reliable and effi cient mode of transportation. The Federal Transit Administration ...defi nes BRT as an innovative transit system that “combines the best of buses...... the quality of rail transit and the fl exibility of buses. It can operate on bus lanes, HOV lanes, expressways, or ordinary streets. A BRT system combines a simple route layout, -Relatively lower deployment and operating costs frequent service, limited stops, Intelligent Transportation -Flexibility that allows for incremental deployment Systems (ITS) technology, passenger information systems, -Ability to travel on any roadway unrestricted by rails traffi c signal priority for transit, cleaner and quieter vehicles, rapid and convenient fare collection, high-quality passenger facilities, and integration with land use policy.” The National Bus Rapid Transit Institute the best of light rail...... ...defi nes BRT as “an innovative, high-capacity, lower-cost public transit solution that can achieve the performance and -Low boarding fl oors and wider interiors benefi ts of more expensive rail modes. This integrated system -Implementation on dedicated tracks uses buses or specialized vehicles on roadways or dedicated -Possible addition of multiple cars on one route lanes to quickly and effi ciently transport passengers to their -Reduction of vehicle dwell time due to off- board payment destinations, while offering the fl exibility to meet a variety systems of local conditions. BRT system elements can easily be customized to community needs and incorporate state-of- the-art, low-cost technologies that attract more passengers and ultimately help reduce overall traffi c congestion.” n j Report 90 of the Transit Cooperative Research Program brt i ...describes BRT as “a fl exible, rubber-tired rapid transit mode that combines stations, vehicles, services, running -Flexibility and cost effi ciency t ways, and its elements into an integrated system with a -Low fl oor buses . strong positive identity that evokes a unique image. BRT -Innovative prototypes with dynamic exteriors applications are designed to be appropriate to the market -Longer than typical buses r they serve and their physical surroundings. BRT can be -Streamlined payment systems leading to faster running u incrementally implemented in a variety of environments. In times t brief, BRT is an integrated system of facilities, services and -Guidance systems amenities that collectively improves the speed, reliability, -Improved propulsion systems g and identity of the bus transit.” -Station platform alignment e -Dedicated lanes r -Landscaped roadways s 4 POSSIBLE BRT FEATURES FOR NEWARK interior confi guration options BRT vehicles can have interiors similar to light rail with wider bodies and multi-directional seating. Seats can be arranged front, back, and towards the center of the vehicle. Vehicles can also include features like bike racks and storage systems for luggage. Low fl oors are essential as they provide for easier boarding which in turn leads to faster running times. Higher ceilings are an additional benefi t. Although there currently are state legal hurdles regarding low-fl oor vehicle’s weight, these are in the process of being revised. brt interior view raised station platforms enhanced vehicle propulsion BRT station platforms can be made level to coordinate with The early 21st century has already witnessed market-tested low-fl oor vehicles.
Recommended publications
  • National Register of Historic Places Registration
    NFS Form 10-900 OMB NO. 10024-0018 (Oct. 1990) RECEIVED 2280 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service AU6-820GO National Register of Historic Places Registration Form NA1 REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES ' NATIONAL PARK SERVICE This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. See instructions in How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form (National Register Bulletin 16A). Complete each item by marking "x" in the appropriate box or by entering the information requested. If an item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional entries and narrative items on continuation sheets (NFS Form 10-900a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer, to complete all items. 1. Name of Property____ Four Corners Historic District historic name N/A other names/site number 2. Location__________________________________________ street & number Roughly bounded by Raymond Blvd., Mulberry St., Hf St. & Washington Stn not for publication city or town Newark_____________________________________________ D vicinity state. New Jersey______ __ __ codeii NJ county Essex code °13 zip code 07102 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended. I hereby certify that this B nomination D request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property B meets D does not meet the National Register criteria.
    [Show full text]
  • Computer Modeling and Simulation of Nj Transit Penn Station Newark
    FHWA-NJ-2004-016 COMPUTER MODELING AND SIMULATION OF NJ TRANSIT PENN STATION NEWARK FINAL REPORT August 2004 Submitted by Dr. Lazar N. Spasovic, Keir Opie, Professor Principal Transportation Engineer School of Management NCTIP/IITC New Jersey Institute of Technology University Heights, Newark, NJ 07102-1982 NJDOT Research Project Manager Nicholas Vitillo In cooperation with New Jersey Department of Transportation Division of Research and Technology and U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration DISCLAIMER STATEMENT The contents of this report reflect the views of the authors who are responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official views or policies of the New Jersey Department of Transportation or the Federal Highway Administration. This report does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation. TECHNICAL REPORT STANDARD TITLE PAGE 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient’s Catalog No. FHWA-NJ-2004-016 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date Computer Modeling And Simulation Of NJ Transit August 2004 Penn Station Newark 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Dr. Lazar N. Spasovic and Keir Opie 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. National Center for Transportation and Industrial Productivity New Jersey Institute of Technology 11. Contract or Grant No. 323 Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd. University Heights Newark, NJ 07102-1982 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered U.S. Department of Transportation N.J. Department of Transportation Research and Special Programs 1035 Parkway Avenue Administration P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • Newark Community Impacts of Mobile Source Emissions a Community-Based Participatory Research Analysis
    Newark Community Impacts of Mobile Source Emissions A Community-Based Participatory Research Analysis November 2020 Contents Introduction and Executive Summary ........................................................................................................... 1 Study Design and Local Community Leadership and Engagement .............................................................. 3 Methodology ................................................................................................................................................. 4 Phase One: Emissions Inventory .............................................................................................................. 4 Phase Two: Emissions Evaluation ............................................................................................................ 6 Key Findings ................................................................................................................................................. 8 Discussion ................................................................................................................................................... 17 Conclusion .................................................................................................................................................. 19 Table of Figures Figure 1. Key Demographics of Study Area..................................................................................................3 Figure 2. Geographic Scope and Study Area.................................................................................................4
    [Show full text]
  • N-Tree Provides a Framework of and Place
    N- N- N- TREE ! TREE ! TREE ! OUtlINE VS. FIll BRICKS AND TREES FROM THE GROUND UP FABRIC TRANSFORMATION BUILDING BLOCKS TOGETHER Our goal is to organize, coordinate and capitalize on Newark’s social capital Just as a strong family network is the building block of a community, the brick “When we come together there’s nothing we can’t create.” not just to build one-off “Gateways” on its periphery, but to transform its and the tree are the building blocks of the city. Newark is still known as Brick —Mayor Cory A. Booker interior social and urban fabric. Newark can’t be defined by an outline or city. Not just because it’s made of brick but because of the admirable way disparate “points of entry” because its edge is too diffuse to remember, and Newark turned the arrangement of a simple module and hard work into a The building blocks of Newark are bricks, trees and people. Arranging brick because many of its key gateways happen inside the city. Newark is bordered city. We propose the introduction of a second building block, the tree and after brick builds a city, planting tree after tree initially creates a line of by diverse conditions and is diverse inside, so it’s a bit hard to know when you an inspirational plan on how to build with it. Using the tree as a new build- trees, then a field of lines identifying and beautifying Newark. In light of have arrived. To strengthen its identity, Newark needs definition and presence ing block, Newark citizens and local businesses and communities can improve today’s economy and municipal budget cuts, N-Tree provides a framework of and place.
    [Show full text]
  • Roth, Race, and Newark
    Roth, Race, and Newark Larry Schwartz Photo by Marlon Holmes In recent years, one of the ways in which Philip Roth's literary reputation has been advanced is through the proposition he has "universalized" his Newark cityscape comparable to Joyce's Dublin or Faulkner's Yoknapatawpha County.1 It argues for the view that Roth's Jewish neighborhood, Weequahic, is indeed representative of Newark and, in turn, his vision of Newark illuminates urban/ethnic, postwar America. However, from my perspective, Roth and his reviewers are disturbingly uncritical about race and its legacy in Newark. His recent American trilogy (American Pastoral [1997], I Married A Communist [1998] and The Human Stain [2000]) when taken together with the two non- fiction works that preceded the novels (The Facts: A Novelist's Autobiography [1988] and Patrimony: A True Story [1991]) offer a very blinkered view of Newark and its racial politics. In these books, there is a willingness to stereotype post-1965 Newark as a crime- ridden burnt-out city of Blacks and, unfortunately, to contribute to a liberal, racist mentality about Newark as an unlivable city especially when contrasted to "the good old" days of the 1940s and 1950s. For the few short years of Roth's adolescence (1945 to 1950), Newark's almost two decades of industrial decline was held in check. Roth and his generation were the inheritors of an efflorescence that was the culmination of Newark's "golden" era, but one that was built on long-term, cynical exploitation of racism and deep, pervasive political corruption. What undermined many northern cities was de-industrialization, which in Newark had started in the 1920s (despite the economic boom), accelerated by the Depression, briefly reversed during World War II, and then resumed with breath-taking speed shortly after the War.
    [Show full text]
  • Montclair's Train Stations
    Montclair’s Train Stations Compiled by Montclair History Center Trustee, Helen Fallon September, 2018 l www.montclairhistory.org l [email protected] Lackawanna Station 291 Bloomfield Avenue • Montclair has six train stations. • There have been three different train station buildings at this Bloomfield Avenue site. • Rail service to this Bloomfield Avenue station began in 1856, when Montclair was still known as West Bloomfield. The line was first operated by the Newark & Bloomfield Rail Company; shortly thereafter it became part of the Morris & Essex Railroad; and in 1868 the line became part of the Delaware Lackawanna & Western Railroad (DL&W).1 • The first station, from the mid-1800s, was fairly simple – seen in the photos and drawing that follow. • From this Montclair terminus, commuters or travelers (or goods) could ride to Hoboken, where they would switch to the ferry to New York City. Travel time was said to be 1.5 hours each way. First Lackawanna Station 291 Bloomfield Avenue First Lackawanna Station 291 Bloomfield Avenue First Lackawanna Station 291 Bloomfield Avenue Second Lackawanna Station 291 Bloomfield Avenue • The next series of maps and photos show the second station building—a bit more elegant than the first, but, in keeping with other train stations of the time, designed to accommodate freight as much as passengers. • The map details – from 1890 and 1906 – show the extensive network of sidings and some of the industrial/commercial uses around the station. • I especially enjoy the photo with the white Borden’s Condensed Milk carriages lined up next to the train—either loading or unloading.
    [Show full text]
  • Cooperbaschdissertation.Pdf
    THE EVOLUTION OF VICTORIA FOUNDATION FROM 1924 TO 2003 WITH A SPECIAL FOCUS ON THE NEWARK YEARS FROM 1964 TO 2003 by IRENE COOPER-BASCH A Dissertation submitted to the Graduate School-Newark Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey & New Jersey Institute of Technology in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Joint Graduate Program in Urban Systems-Education Policy Written under the direction of Dr. Alan R. Sadovnik, Rutgers University Chair and approved by _____________________________________________ Dr. Alan R. Sadovnik, Rutgers University _____________________________________________ Dr. Gabrielle Esperdy, New Jersey Institute of Technology _____________________________________________ Dr. Clement A. Price, Rutgers University _____________________________________________ Dr. Christopher J. Daggett, Geraldine R. Dodge Foundation, Morristown, NJ Newark, New Jersey May, 2014 © 2014 Irene Cooper-Basch ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION The Evolution of Victoria Foundation From 1924 to 2003 With a Special Focus on the Newark Years From 1964 to 2003 By IRENE COOPER-BASCH Dissertation Director: Professor Alan Sadovnik This dissertation examines the history of Victoria Foundation from its inception in 1924 through 2003, with a special emphasis on its place-based urban grantmaking in Newark, New Jersey from 1964 through 2003. Insights into Victoria’s role and impact in Newark, particularly those connected to its extensive preK-12 education grantmaking, were gleaned through an analyses of the evolution of Newark, the history of education in Newark, and the history of foundations in America. Several themes emerged from the research, an examination of the archives, and 28 oral history interviews including: charity vs. philanthropy, risk-taking, scattershot grantmaking, self-reflection, issues of race, and evaluation.
    [Show full text]
  • Irvington Avenue: Creating a Complete Corridor Connecting People, Places, and Potential
    IRVINGTON AVENUE: CREATING A COMPLETE CORRIDOR CONNECTING PEOPLE, PLACES, AND POTENTIAL. A LOCAL DEMONSTRATION PROJECT AUGUST 2014 New Street Tree Add sections PROJECT PARTNERS PROJECT CONTRIBUTORS Maplewood Township Adassa Day Care Township of South Orange Village Diamond Gym City of Newark Garden Academy Essex County Town and Country Pharmacy Maplewood Chamber of Commerce United Vailsburg Services Organization NJ TRANSIT PROJECT TEAM EE&K a Perkins Eastman Company Larisa Ortiz Associates Fitzgerald & Halliday TABLE OF CONTENTS TOGETHER NORTH JERSEY 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4 1. ANALYSIS: WHERE ARE WE NOW? WHERE ARE WE HEADED? 7 I. Irvington Avenue Corridor 8 II. Corridor Mobility 12 III. Maplewood Corners 16 IV. Outreach Methodology 26 V. Outreach Outcomes 27 VI. Other Plans 28 2. VISION: WHERE DO WE WANT TO GO? 31 I. Streetscape Recommendations 32 II. Expanding the TOD Radius: Corridor Bike Route 33 III. Key Places in Maplewood Corners 38 IV. Pedestrian Environment and Safety 42 3. IMPLEMENTATION: HOW DO WE GET THERE? 47 I. Implementation 48 II. State Agency Walk, Talk and Act Tour 52 Planning and Implementation Agenda (11”x17” format) Attached 2 Irvington Avenue: Creating a Complete Corridor ABOUT TOGETHER NORTH JERSEY In November 2011, the U.S. Department of ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Housing and Urban Development (HUD) awarded TOGETHER NORTH JERSEY (aka, • 13 County Governments in the NJTPA Region SUSSEX North Jersey Sustainable Communities PASSAIC Consortium) a $5 million Sustainable • Edward J. Bloustein School for Planning Communities Regional Planning Grant. BERGEN and Public Policy at Rutgers University WARREN The grant is matched with an additional Paterson • North Jersey Transportation Planning MORRIS $5 million in leveraged funds from project ESSEX Authority (NJTPA) HUDSON partners.
    [Show full text]
  • Study of Redevelopment Zones and Their Potential Impacts on Identified Historic Properties
    STUDY OF REDEVELOPMENT ZONES AND THEIR POTENTIAL IMPACTS ON IDENTIFIED HISTORIC PROPERTIES TOWNSHIP OF MONTCLAIR, ESSEX COUNTY, NEW JERSEY 07042 Prepared for: THE MONTCLAIR HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION Prepared by MARY DELANEY KRUGMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. (MDKA) December 2018 STUDY OF REDEVELOPMENT ZONES AND THEIR POTENTIAL IMPACTS ON IDENTIFIED HISTORIC PROPERTIES TOWNSHIP OF MONTCLAIR, ESSEX COUNTY, NEW JERSEY 07042 Prepared for THE MONTCLAIR HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION Montclair Municipal Building 205 Claremont Avenue Montclair, New Jersey 07042 Contact: Kathleen M. Bennett, Chairperson Prepared by MARY DELANEY KRUGMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. (MDKA) Historic Preservation Consultants 62 Myrtle Avenue, Montclair, New Jersey 07042 Preparer: Mary Delaney Krugman, JD, MSHP December 2018 STUDY OF REDEVELOPMENT ZONES AND THEIR POTENTIAL IMPACTS TO IDENTIFIED HISTORIC DISTRICTS IN THE TOWNSHIP OF MONTCLAIR, NJ Page | 3 Montclair Township Interactive Planning Map: https://mtnjplanning.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=cb868e4816b94e52960fec6a3acfb1ff ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This study was financed by the Historic Preservation Commission of the Township of Montclair, New Jersey. Special thanks to Commission Chair Kathleen M. Bennett, and Stephen Rooney, Planning Board Liaison, whose comments and guidance helped shape the final product, and to Graham Petto, P.P., AICP, Commission Secretary, who supervised the administration of the study. HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MEMBERS Kathleen M. Bennett Chair* Jason Hyndman, Vice Chair Stephen
    [Show full text]
  • Working Towards an Equitable Lower Broadway Equitable Neighborhood Development Plan Newark, New Jersey
    NALCAB Working Towards an Equitable Lower Broadway Equitable Neighborhood Development Plan Newark, New Jersey Developed in partnership with Mission The mission of La Casa de Don Pedro is to foster self-sufficiency, empowerment and neighborhood revitalization. Through La Casa’s resident-centered education and development strategies, neighborhood revitalization initiatives, and family stabilizing programs and services, the organization works to ensure that Greater Newark’s residents engage in and benefit from the region’s growth. Lower Broadway Equitable Neighborhood Development Plan Table of Contents 01 | Introduction 4 02 | About the Neighborhood 8 03 | Vision for the Neighborhood 14 04 | Goals, Strategies, and Actions 16 05 | Metrics of Success 22 lacasanwk.org • 3 La Casa utilizes a service delivery model designed to meet the ever changing social services needs embedded across the life cycle of the children, individuals, and families in Newark’s underserved communities. 01 | Introduction Overview La Casa serves approximately 50,000 people each year. The agency’s primary service area is Newark’s North Founded in 1972, La Casa began as an activist, End, with a comprehensive community development community-based, grassroots organization committed initiative for its Lower Broadway community. Our to empowering the then marginalized Puerto Rican community reflects a diverse demographic profile and Latino communities. Named in honor of Puerto of largely Hispanic and African-Americans, with a Rican nationalist, Don Pedro Albizu Campos who growing West African community. advocated the twin virtues of self-sufficiency and La Casa provides services in the following areas: empowerment, La Casa was born out of collaborative Affordable Housing Development; Emergency and unifying efforts to reverse the trajectory of social, Financial Assistance; Housing Counseling, including cultural, political, and economic dislocations and First Time Homebuyer Education and Foreclosure marginalization of children and families.
    [Show full text]
  • Many Faces One Mission
    You Are Viewing an Archived Report from the New Jersey State Library 2014 NJ TRANSIT ANNUAL REPORT MANY ONE FACES MISSION 2014 NJ TRANSIT ANNUALYou Are Viewing an Archived REPORT Report from the New TABLE Jersey State Library OF CONTENTS facebook.com/NJTRANSIT twitter.com/NJ_TRANSIT youtube.com/user/TheNewJerseyTransit Messages 04 Chairman’s Message 05 Executive Director’s Message FY2014 Highlights 06 Scorecard 08 Improving the Customer Experience 08 Service Swee Ang 09 Equipment Access Link System Analyst 10 Facilities 13 Infrastructure 14 Studies 15 Technology 16 Safety & Security 18 Financial Performance 18 Corporate Accountability 21 Superstorm Sandy Recovery and Resiliency On-Time Performance 22 On-time Performance by Mode William Crawford 23 Rail Methodology Rail Machinist 24 Light Rail Methodology 25 Bus Methodology Board, Committees and Management Team 26 Board of Directors 30 Advisory Committees 31 Executive Management Team 33 FY2014 Financial Report Michele Turel Police Detective 2 MANY ONE 2014 NJ TRANSIT ANNUAL REPORT TABLE OF CONTENTS You Are Viewing an Archived Report from the New Jersey State Library FACES MISSION NJTransit.com Addie Solomon Laurie DiMenno NLR Mechanical Technician Access Link Sr. Financial Support Analyst William Crawford Aaron Jordan Rail Machinist Bus Starter Rocio Munoz Michele Turel Jonathan Bak OPRA Specialist Police Detective Customer Service Rep 3 2014 NJ TRANSIT ANNUALYou Are Viewing an Archived REPORT Report from the New CHAIRMAN’S Jersey State Library MESSAGE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR’S MESSAGE It is an honor and privilege for me the former Curtiss-Wright plant in evening hours in FY2014 to to rejoin the NJ TRANSIT team Bergen County.
    [Show full text]
  • Bay Street Station Montclair Nj Train Schedule
    Bay Street Station Montclair Nj Train Schedule Churchward and huddled Alfred reffed: which Luther is indefinite enough? Spinozistic and gradualism Sanderson never cave his prank! Unmemorable and petrous Miguel often intimidate some calescence full or liberalised nigh. Once a rail bed, the trail is wide, level and generally flat. Do pet people live longer? Use our detailed filters to find the perfect place, then get in touch with the property manager. Get breaking Middlesex County news, weather, real estate, events, restaurants and more from Edison, New Brunswick, Piscataway and others. Currently the shortest route from Bard College to Red Hook. This is less expensive to implement than wholly newservices, and does not require expensive marketing. Projected Annual Highway Infrastructure Renewal Costs. Click on the map to view detailed information. Lewis Historical Publishing Company. Office Staff does not coach tenants towards the proper ways to participate in our community and then, does not follow up with discipline action. Bob Allen was a young, nationally known, clay target shooter before the war, who later parlayed his aerial gunner instructor duties into a combat assignment in the South Pacific. Construction modeling workflows are hard. Bus Schedule in Carteret on YP. Report of motor vehicle accident. North Bergen is being rehabilitated. View and download individual routes and schedules, or create a personalized bus book. Traveling on this company you can ride in several types of bus. Stay dry inside and out with this breathable lightweight waterproof technology. Comment on the news, see photos and videos and join forum. On the last car of trains operating from Hoboken.
    [Show full text]