Industrial Disputes Referred for Adjudication
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
© Regn. No. KERBIL/2012/45073 tIcf k¿°m¿ dated 5-9-2012 with RNI Government of Kerala Reg. No. KL/TV(N)/634/2018-20 2019 tIcf Kkddv KERALA GAZETTE B[nImcnIambn {]kn≤s∏SpØp∂Xv PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY 2019 Unkw-_¿ 17 Xncph\¥]pcw, hmeyw 8 17th December 2019 \º¿ sNmΔ 1195 [\p 1 1st Dhanu 1195 50 } Thiruvananthapuram, } Vol. VIII No. 1941 A{K-lm-b\w 26 Tuesday 26th Agrahayana 1941 PART I Notifications and Orders issued by the Government Labour and Skills Department And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is Labour and Skills (A) necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication; ORDERS Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 (1) (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct G.O. (Rt.) No. 1377/2019/LBR. that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication Thiruvananthapuram, 8th November 2019. to the Labour Court, Ernakulam. The Labour Court will pass the award within a period of three months. Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between Shri A. S. Gopinadh, ANNEXURE Proprietor, M/s. Oriental Exim Agency, Willington Island, “Whether the denial of employment to Kochi-682 003 and the workmen of the above referred Sri P. K. Reghuvaran and Sri T. M. Asharaf, establishment represented by Shri. Joy Joseph, General Secretary, Private Motor Thozhilali Union (AITUC), AITUC Drivers, by the management of M/s. Oriental District Council Office, Near Public Library, TD Road, Exim Agency, Willington Island, Kochi-682 003 is Kochi-682 035 in respect of matters mentioned in the justifiable or not? If not what relief the workers annexure to this order; are entitled to get?” Gaz. No. 50/2019/DTP (Part I). 7 17th Dec. 2019] KERALA GAZETTE 204 (2) ANNEXURE G.O. (Rt.) No. 1378/2019/LBR. “Whether the termination of employment of Thiruvananthapuram, 8th November 2019. Sri Padmanabhan, Security Guard by the management of Kilban Foods India Pvt. Ltd., Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an Poovattuparambu, Kozhikode is justifiable ? industrial dispute exists between the Managing Director, If not what relief he is entitled to?” Kasaragod Jilla Sahakarana Rubber Marketing Society Limited No. C-325, H. O. Chittarikkal, (4) Kasaragod-671 326 and the workman of the above referred G.O. (Rt.) No. 1399/2019/LBR. establishment Sri Bino George, Thaipparampil, Kuruncheri, Thiruvananthapuram, 15th November 2019. Bheemanadi P. O., Kasaragod-671 314 in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order; Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is industrial dispute exists between the (1) Secretary, necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication; Mundoor Service Sahakarana Bank Limited R-189, Anjoor P. O., Mundoor, Thrissur-680 541 (2) the President, Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 Mundoor Service Sahakarana Bank Limited R-189, Anjoor (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct P. O., Mundoor, Thrissur-680 541 and the workman of the that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication above referred establishment Sri K. Sugathan, to the Labour Court, Kannur. The Labour Court will pass S/o Velayudhan, Kolothu House, Mundoor P. O., Thrissur- the award within a period of three months. 680 541 in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order; ANNEXURE “Whether the dismissal of Sri Bino George, unskilled And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is worker, Kasaragod Latex Factory by the necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication; management of the Kasaragod District Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred Co-operative Rubber Marketing Society Ltd. No. by Section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 C-325 is justifiable, If not what are the relief he (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct entitled to?” that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Thrissur. The Industrial Tribunal (3) will pass the award within a period of three months. G.O. (Rt.) No. 1390/2019/LBR. ANNEXURE Thiruvananthapuram, 12th November 2019. “Whether the termination of employment of Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an Sri K.Sugathan, Manager in charge, by the industrial dispute exists between Sri Muhammed Salih, management of Mundoor Service Co-operative Managing Director, Kilban Foods India Private Limited, Bank Ltd. R-189 is justifiable ? If not what Poovattuparambu,Kozhikode and the workman of the above referred establishment Sri P. Padmanabhan, relief he is entitled to get?” Puvannur House, Kanniparambu P.O., Mavoor, (5) Kozhikkode-673 661 in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order; G.O. (Rt.) No. 1409/2019/LBR. Thiruvananthapuram, 18th November 2019. And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication; Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an industrial dispute exists between Smt. Shyni Jose, Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 Propritrics, Qmax Assay Hallmarking Centre, Pallikulam (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct Road, Thrissur-680 001 and the workman of the above that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication referred establishment Smt. Meena P. Nair, Madathil to the Labour Court, Kozhikkode. The Labour Court will Veedu, P. O. Avannur, Thrissur-680 581 in respect of pass the award within a period of three months. matters mentioned in the annexure to this order; 8 17th Dec. 2019] KERALA GAZETTE 205 And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is (7) necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication; G.O. (Rt.) No. 1411/2019/LBR. Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred Thiruvananthapuram, 18th November 2019. by Section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct industrial dispute exists between (1) Falak Gandhi, that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication Manager (HR), Abbot Health Care (P) Ltd., Floor 18, to the Industrial Trbunal, Thrissur. The Industrial Tribunal Godrej BKC, Plot No. C-68, BKC, Near MCA Club, Bandra (E), will pass the award within a period of three months. Mumbai-400 051 (2) Sreekanth M. V., Zonal Manager, Abbot Health Care (P) Ltd., 3rd Floor, Thunga Tower, ANNEXURE 94KH Road, Double Road, Bangalore-560 027 and the “Whether the denial of employment to workmen of the above referred establishment represented Smt. Meena P. Nair, Worker by the management by the District Secretary, Bharatheeya Medical & Sales of Qmax Assay Hallmarking Centre, Pallikulam Representative Association, Kallai Road, Road, Thrissur is justifiable ? If not what relief Kozhikode-673 002 in respect of matters mentioned she is entitled to get?” in the annexure to this order; (6) And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication; G.O. (Rt.) No. 1410/2019/LBR. Thiruvananthapuram, 18th November 2019. Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct industrial dispute exists between the Managing Director, that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication Kasaragod Jilla Sahakarana Rubber Marketing to the Labour Court, Kozhikkode. The Labour Court will Society Limited No. C-325, H. O. Chittarikkal, pass the award within a period of three months. Kasaragod-671 326 and the workman of the above ANNEXURE referred establishment Sri Babu Mathew, Idasseril House, Mangode P. O., Kottamala, Neeleswaram (Vazhi), “Whether the denial of employment to Kasaragod-671 314 in respect of matters mentioned Sri Ragesh, Sales Executive by the management of Abbot Health Care (P) Ltd., Floor 18, Godrej in the annexure to this order; BKC, Plot No. C-68, BKC Near MCA Club, And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is Bandra (E), Mumbai-400 051 is justifiable? necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication; If not what relief he is entitled to get? ” Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred (8) by Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 G.O. (Rt.) No. 1413/2019/LBR. (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct Thiruvananthapuram, 18th November 2019. that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an to the Labour Court, Kannur. The Labour Court will pass industrial dispute exists between the President, Payyannur the award within a period of three months. Urban Co-operative Society Limited No. C-1556, ANNEXURE Payyannur, Kannur District, Pin-670 307 the workman of “Whether the dismissal of Sri Babu Mathew, the above referred establishment Sri. Muraleedharan, C. M. S/o Kunjikkannan Nair, Peralam, Kozhummal Post, Kannur- unskilled worker, Kasaragod Latex Factory by 670 521 in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure the management of the Kasaragod District to this order; Co-operative Rubber Marketing Society Limited No. C-325 is justifiable or not? If not what And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is relief he is entitled to get?” necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication; 9 17th Dec. 2019] KERALA GAZETTE 206 Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred Fortqueen Hotel, Kochi-2 and the worker of the above by Section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 referred establishment represented by Smt.