California Western Law Review Volume 41 Number 1 Article 3 2004 ESSAY: Voiceless Billy Budd: Melville's Tribute to the Sixth Amendment Juan Ramirez Jr. Judge, Third District Court of Appeal, Florida Amy D. Ronner St. Thomas University School of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.cwsl.edu/cwlr Recommended Citation Ramirez, Juan Jr. and Ronner, Amy D. (2004) "ESSAY: Voiceless Billy Budd: Melville's Tribute to the Sixth Amendment," California Western Law Review: Vol. 41 : No. 1 , Article 3. Available at: https://scholarlycommons.law.cwsl.edu/cwlr/vol41/iss1/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by CWSL Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in California Western Law Review by an authorized editor of CWSL Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact
[email protected]. Ramirez and Ronner: ESSAY: Voiceless Billy Budd: Melville's Tribute to the Sixth Amen ESSAYS VOICELESS BILLY BuDD: MELVILLE'S TRIBUTE TO THE SIXTH AMENDMENT THE HONORABLE JUAN RAMIREZ, JR.* and AMY D. RONNER** INTRODUCTION In Billy Budd, Sailor, Herman Melville's voice christens the cli- mactic chapter depicting the trial that culminates in Billy Budd's death sentence: Who in the rainbow can draw the line where the violet tint ends and the orange tint begins? Distinctly we see the difference of the colors, but where exactly does the one first blendingly enter into the other? So with sanity and insanity.' Here, the author ponders the adjudicator, Captain Edwin Fairfax Vere, who presides over the case of a morally innocent sailor accused of murdering the evil petty officer, John Claggart.2 Just before the trial, the author foists a frightening proposition upon his readers: namely, that Captain Vere, the one empowered to decide life or death, could indeed be "the sudden victim of any degree of aberration."3 What is most curious, however, is that despite the fact that the omnis- cient narrator doubts his own character's sanity, commentators have .