Optimizing Tracking Software for a Time Projection Chamber Wilson H
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science Volume 49 Article 18 1995 Optimizing Tracking Software for a Time Projection Chamber Wilson H. Howe University of Arkansas at Little Rock Christine A. Byrd University of Arkansas at Little Rock Amber D. Climer University of Arkansas at Little Rock Wilfred J. Braithwaite University of Arkansas at Little Rock Jeffrey T. Mitchell Brookhaven National Laboratory Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarworks.uark.edu/jaas Part of the Nuclear Commons Recommended Citation Howe, Wilson H.; Byrd, Christine A.; Climer, Amber D.; Braithwaite, Wilfred J.; and Mitchell, Jeffrey T. (1995) "Optimizing Tracking Software for a Time Projection Chamber," Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science: Vol. 49 , Article 18. Available at: http://scholarworks.uark.edu/jaas/vol49/iss1/18 This article is available for use under the Creative Commons license: Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-ND 4.0). Users are able to read, download, copy, print, distribute, search, link to the full texts of these articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UARK. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science by an authorized editor of ScholarWorks@UARK. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science, Vol. 49 [1995], Art. 18 a Time Projection Chamber Wilson H. Howe, Christine A.Byrd, Amber D. Climer, W.J. Braithwaite Department of Physics and Astronomy University of Arkansas at Little Rock LittleRock, Ar 72204 Jeffrey T.Mitchell Brookhaven National Laboratory Upton, NY11973 Abstract International research collaborations willbe using accelerators in the U.S. and Europe to produce and detect t5 phase transition in high-density nuclear matter called the Quark-Gluon Plasma, formed in collisions between pairs < A=200 nuclei, for projectiles with kinetic energies large compared to their rest mass energies. Each collaboration willus time projection chambers (TPC) to track thousands of secondary charged particles formed in the aftermath of each cen- tral primary collision. Creating and optimizing TPC tracking software is difficultin such a highmultiplicity environment, particularly for particles with a low momentum (below 300 MeV/C). Athigh momenta, energy loss is low enough for par- ticle-tracking to use unchanging helix parameters. However, at low momenta, tracking requires changing helix parameters as energy is lost along the path. Tracking software, written flOrparticles of high momenta, may identify the track of a sin- gle low momentum particle as two or three separate tracks. This tracking problem was corrected by changing the main tracking algorithm to merge together these two-or-three fragmented, low-momentum particle tracks. Event displays were found exceedingly helpful indiagnosing the problems and optimizing the algorithms. Introduction (Pb) beams on a fixed lead target. The second effort is planned at Brookhaven National Laboratory using RHIC Within the first microsecond after the big bang, the (the Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider), where heavy nuclei Standard Model predicts that mass-energy densities were willcollide inpairs. RHIC and its detectors are on sched- so high, the dominant form of matter in the universe was ule for completion by the end of the century (Schukraft, the quark-gluon plasma or QGP (Schukraft, 1993). QGP 1993). is a state in which quarks and gluons move freely at a RHIC is expected to provide the energy necessary to much higher mass-energy density than that of nuclear produce the QGP by colliding gold nuclei, where each is matter. At lower mass-energy density, quarks and gluons moving within 1 part in 20,000 light speed. At such are usually bound together in particles such as protons, speeds, the kinetic energy of each colliding gold nucleus neutrons, pions, etc. Except, possibly, in the cores of neu- is over 100 times its rest mass energy. The Standard tron stars, densities and temperatures do not rise high Model predicts the QGP willbe formed at these high enough to permit quarks and gluons to break free from energy densities, so even ifthe QGP is not formed, these protons and neutrons, so QGP is not readily observed in efforts willprovide a significant test of the Standard nature (Schukraft, 1993). Attempts to produce QGP have Model. been made using the SPS (Super Proton Synchrotron) at AtRHIC, the effort to observe the QGP willbe car- CERN and using the AGS (Alternating Gradient ried out by analyzing the particles emerging from the Synchrotron) at Brookhaven National Laboratory. In aftermath ofcentral collisions between relativistic pairs of each case relativistic nuclei collide with stationary nuclei gold nuclei. Thousands of charged secondary particles, in fixed targets. None of these experiments have reported produced ineach primary collision, willbe used to inves- the detection of the QGP (Schmidt, 1993). tigate the physics of the primary collision. Detectors at Two distinct attempts are now being made to pro- RHIC are being built to track charged particles generated duce the phase transition from normal nuclear matter to in the aftermath of each central primary collision. Several QGP, using relativistic beams of heavy nuclei. One effort, thousand charged secondary particles (called a high mul- which is underway, uses the SPS at CERN to provide lead tiplicity environment) make tracking a difficult experi- Proceedings Arkansas Academy of Science, Vol.49, 1995 75 Published by Arkansas Academy of Science, 1995 75 ? Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science, Vol. 49 [1995], Art. 18 mental problem. The TPC is a coaxial cylinder, 4.2 meters long, with The Solenoidal Tracker (STAR) is one of two large an outside diameter of 4 meters and an inside diameter instruments located at RHIC at one of its six colliding- of 2 meters. The cylinder is located within the Solenoidal beam crossover points. Secondary charged particles pro- Magnet and around the vertex tracking detector. Particles duced at RHIC are observed using different sub-dectors with momenta greater than 125 MeV / c can make it of STAR, which is made up of a solenoidal magnet con- through the TPC geometry, but tracking lower-momen- taining these sub-detectors. The solenoidal magnet sur- tum particles is left to the vertex detector. The TPC miss- rounds the beam pipe of RHIC, creating a magnetic field es some high momentum particles due to its geometry, (0.5 T) along the beam line. Charged particles willbend but overall it tracks about 50% of the secondary charged in this B-field, and the charge and momentum of these particles created in each central collider event (STAR, particles willbe determined by measuring the curvature 1992). The TPC cylinder is divided inhalf by a high volt- of their tracks. The STAR sub-detectors are being built to age membrane which creates an electric field (130 V / determine pixel-by-pixel coordinates of each particle's tra- cm). The endcaps are made up of rows of pads at low jectory, so all can be tracked simultaneously. potential (1265 V), where the signals for tracking parti- The main sub-detector in STAR is the Time cles are induced. The track density is great near the ver- Projection Chamber (TPC), which measures the trajecto- tex; thus, pads close to the vertex are small (2.85 x 11.5 ries of charged particles in three spatial dimensions. The mm) providing good track separation. TPC pads farther TPC is complemented by several other detectors; these from the vertex are larger (6.2 x 19.5 mm), providing bet- include: a tracker near the collider vertex responsible for ter particle identification (STAR, 1992). measuring all charged particle tracks, especially those The TPC is designed to detect charged particles, with low transverse momentum (below 150 MeV / c) or identify them, and obtain the momentum and charge of short half-lives; trigger detectors for measuring when and each. The TPC can be viewed as electronically "taking a where each gold on gold event occurs; and an three-dimensional picture of the particle trajectories" as Electromagnetic Calorimeter used to measure particle the particles ionize its gas, as seen in Fig. 1. The electric energies (STAR, 1992). field causes the ionization electrons to drift toward the Fig. 1. Ionization electrons are shown drifting toward the endcaps of a Time Projection Chamber, lhe size or the beam pipe is exaggerated. Proceedings Arkansas Academy of Science, Vol.49, 1995 ? ? 76 http://scholarworks.uark.edu/jaas/vol49/iss1/18 76 Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science, Vol. 49 [1995], Art. 18 ends of the TPC chamber. There the signal from each difficult since their tracks can start anywhere in the TPC electron is amplified at a thin anode wire; a signal is then instead of starting at the vertex. Allparticle tracks do induced on a pad under the wire. The placement of the have common characteristics, and these characteristics signal on the pad gives two coordinates of the track, and are used in designing tracking software. For instance, the drift time gives the third coordinate. Up to 45 (x,y,z) charged particles follow helical paths inmagnetic fields, pixel coordinates may be associated with a single track; so the tracking algorithm uses a helix to link hits into par- tracking software groups these three-dimensional coordi- ticle tracks. nates into particle tracks. The tracking algorithm starts by making groups out Measuring charged particle tracks is important of all the hits on the outside of the TPC. Because of the because these tracks can be used to infer fundamental lower track density, this algorithm begins with the outer- information about the primary central collision which most hit and moves inward toward the vertex.