DOCSLIB.ORG

Rio Grande National Forest Land Management Plan Final Environmental Impact Statement: Volume II Appendix D: Public Involvement and Response to Comments

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Rio Grande National Forest Land Management Plan Final Environmental Impact Statement: Volume II Appendix D: Public Involvement and Response to Comments United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Rio Grande National Forest Land Management Plan Final Environmental Impact Statement: Volume II Appendix D: Public Involvement and Response to Comments Alamosa, Archuleta, Conejos, Hinsdale, Mineral, Rio Grande, Saguache, and San Juan Counties, Colorado April 2020 Crestone Peak viewed through the Natural Arch In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident. Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible agency or USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. Additionally, program information may be made available in languages other than English. To file a program discrimination complaint, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, AD-3027, found online at http://www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_cust.html and at any USDA office or write a letter addressed to USDA and provide in the letter all of the information requested in the form. To request a copy of the complaint form, call (866) 632-9992. Submit your completed form or letter to USDA by: (1) mail: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, D.C. 20250-9410; (2) fax: (202) 690-7442; or (3) email: [email protected] (link sends e-mail). USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender. Rio Grande National Forest Land Management Plan Final Environmental Impact Statement: Volume ll Appendix D: Public Involvement and Response to Comments i Contents Contents ........................................................................................................................................ iii Public Involvement and Response to Comments ...................................................................... 1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................. 1 Air Quality (AIR) ......................................................................................................................... 14 Climate Change (CC) ................................................................................................................. 16 Congressionally Designated Trails (CDT) ................................................................................. 19 Cultural Resources (CR) ............................................................................................................ 39 Fire (FIRE) ................................................................................................................................. 41 Fisheries (FISH) ......................................................................................................................... 43 Geology, Energy, and Minerals (MIN) ....................................................................................... 47 Infrastructure (INFR) .................................................................................................................. 53 Aquatic and Terrestrial Nonnative Invasive Species and Noxious Weeds (NNIS) .................... 60 Lands and Special Uses (LAND) ............................................................................................... 65 Management and Geographic Areas (MGA) ............................................................................. 66 Monitoring .................................................................................................................................. 74 National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) ................................................................................ 77 National Forest Management Act (NFMA) ................................................................................. 82 Plan Components (PC) .............................................................................................................. 84 Public Participation .................................................................................................................... 92 Range (RNG) ............................................................................................................................. 96 Recreation (REC) ..................................................................................................................... 106 Riparian .................................................................................................................................... 118 Roadless .................................................................................................................................. 126 Socioeconomics and Ecosystem Services (SOCIO) ............................................................... 127 Soils (SOIL) .............................................................................................................................. 133 Special Interest Areas and Research Natural Areas (SIA) ...................................................... 135 Vegetation (VEG) ..................................................................................................................... 139 Water (WA) .............................................................................................................................. 175 Wilderness (WILD) ................................................................................................................... 188 Wildlife (WLDF) ........................................................................................................................ 198 Wild, Scenic, and Recreational Rivers (WSRR) ...................................................................... 232 iii List of Tables Table 1. Name of commenters to the draft environmental impact statement and draft forest plan ................. 1 Table 2. Treatment of nonnative invasive species on the Forest, 2004–2018 ...............................................62 Table 3. Primitive and semiprimitive motorized route miles by alternative ...................................................111 Table 4. Recreation opportunity spectrum class acres in upper tier roadless areas (percentage) ...............111 Table 5. Existing motorized and nonmotorized trail miles, by alternative .....................................................113 Table 6. Regional guidelines for old forest criteria .......................................................................................151 Table 7. Criteria used to determine old forest ..............................................................................................152 List of Figures Figure 1. Comparison of annual forest products production estimates between the 1992 plan, 2017 DEIS, and 2019 FEIS .............................................................................................................................................145 iv Rio Grande National Forest Land Management Plan Final Environmental Impact Statement Volume II: Appendix D Public Involvement and Response to Comments Public Involvement and Response to Comments This document contains the responses to the public comments that were received for the Rio Grande National Forest Draft Revised Land Management Plan. Introduction The draft environmental impact statement and forest plan were released for public review for 90 days. The Notice of Availability of the draft environmental impact statement and draft forest plan appeared in the Federal Register on September 29, 2017. Some of the specific changes made to the selected alternative based on public and interagency engagement includes: • Combining and correcting direction in the forest plan; • Reframing management approaches and how they are used in the direction; • Refining direction for Canada lynx based on the best available science that became available after the public comment period. Other components of the involvement and transparency of the public involvement efforts associated with this planning effort include the information made available to the public through the forest plan revision website. As a result of this review, approximately 465 letters of comment were received. People who submitted comments on the draft environmental impact statement and draft forest plan are listed in Table 1. Table 1. Name of commenters to the draft environmental impact statement and draft forest plan Letter Signatories Title/Organization Number 1 Brady Van Matre 2 C. Howes 3 Ian Nelson 4 Stu Mennitt 5 David Spencer 6 Meryl Ennis 7 Douglas W. Camp DMA 8 James 9 Kristina "Kay" Crowder Project Coordinator, Solid Waste Management/San Luis Valley 10 Kelsey Urie Ecosystem Council 11 Ana Ruiz 12 Dan and Liz Murray 13 Karl Ford 1 USDA Forest Service
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Gilia Sedifolia Brandeg. (Stonecrop Gilia): a Technical Conservation Assessment
    Gilia sedifolia Brandeg. (stonecrop gilia): A Technical Conservation Assessment Prepared for the USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region, Species Conservation Project August 9, 2004 David G. Anderson Colorado Natural Heritage Program 8002 Campus Delivery — Colorado State University Fort Collins, CO 80523 Peer Review Administered by Society for Conservation Biology Anderson, D.G. (2004, August 9). Gilia sedifolia Brandeg. (stonecrop gilia): a technical conservation assessment. [Online]. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region. Available: http://www.fs.fed.us/r2/projects/scp/ assessments/giliasedifolia.pdf [date of access]. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This research was facilitated by the helpfulness and generosity of many experts, particularly Bill Jennings, Susan Komarek, Peggy Lyon, J. Mark Porter, and James Reveal. Their interest in the project and time spent answering questions were extremely valuable, and their insights into the distribution, habitat, classification, and ecology ofGilia sedifolia were crucial to this project. The rediscovery of this species and its subsequent documentation are solely the work of Susan Komarek; without her efforts very little could be said about this species. J. Mark Porter’s thoughts and insights into this species have contributed greatly to our understanding of G. sedifolia. Greg Hayward, Gary Patton, Jim Maxwell, Andy Kratz, Beth Burkhart, and Joy Bartlett assisted with questions and project management. Jane Nusbaum, Carmen Morales, Betty Eckert, Candyce Jeffery, and Barbara Brayfield provided crucial financial oversight. Amy Lavender assisted with the production of the potential habitat distribution map. Annette Miller provided information for the report on seed storage status. Nan Lederer and Tim Hogan provided valuable assistance and insights at the CU Herbarium, as did Janet Wingate and Loraine Yeatts at the Kalmbach Herbarium.
    [Show full text]
  • San Juan Landscape Rangeland Environmental Assessment, March
    United States Department of Agriculture Environmental Forest Service Assessment March 2009 San Juan Landscape Rangeland Assessment Ouray Ranger District and Gunnison Ranger District Grand Mesa, Uncompahgre, and Gunnison National Forests Ouray, Gunnison, Hinsdale Counties, Colorado Cover photo: Box Factory Park courtesy of Barry Johnston The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of an individuals income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, DC 20250-9410, or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Environmental Assessment San Juan Landscape Rangeland Assessment San Juan Landscape Rangeland Assessment Environmental Assessment Ouray, Gunnison, Hinsdale Counties, Colorado Lead Agency: USDA Forest Service Grand Mesa, Uncompahgre and Gunnison National Forests Responsible Officials: Tamera
    [Show full text]
  • Profiles of Colorado Roadless Areas
    PROFILES OF COLORADO ROADLESS AREAS Prepared by the USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region July 23, 2008 INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 2 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS ARAPAHO-ROOSEVELT NATIONAL FOREST ......................................................................................................10 Bard Creek (23,000 acres) .......................................................................................................................................10 Byers Peak (10,200 acres)........................................................................................................................................12 Cache la Poudre Adjacent Area (3,200 acres)..........................................................................................................13 Cherokee Park (7,600 acres) ....................................................................................................................................14 Comanche Peak Adjacent Areas A - H (45,200 acres).............................................................................................15 Copper Mountain (13,500 acres) .............................................................................................................................19 Crosier Mountain (7,200 acres) ...............................................................................................................................20 Gold Run (6,600 acres) ............................................................................................................................................21
    [Show full text]
  • Grand Mesa, Uncompahgre, and Gunnison National Forests DRAFT Wilderness Evaluation Report August 2018
    United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Grand Mesa, Uncompahgre, and Gunnison National Forests DRAFT Wilderness Evaluation Report August 2018 Designated in the original Wilderness Act of 1964, the Maroon Bells-Snowmass Wilderness covers more than 183,000 acres spanning the Gunnison and White River National Forests. In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident. Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. Additionally, program information may be made available in languages other than English. To file a program discrimination complaint, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, AD-3027, found online at http://www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_cust.html and at any USDA office or write a letter addressed to USDA and provide in the letter all of the information requested in the form.
    [Show full text]
  • Outing Description Day, Date, Summer 2013 Difficulty Rating, Departure Time Printer-Friendly Version
    Outing Description Day, Date, Summer 2013 Difficulty Rating, Departure Time Printer-friendly version Total Length & Logistics, outing rules, meeting places, and difficulty ratings & Departure Place E-mail schedule changes and updates to: Lyle Hancock. Elevation Schedule changes and trip updates are in red Gain If you have received this schedule by mail, please keep in mind that additions and changes are continually being made. Please ask someone with internet access to inform you when these updates occur or go to a friends computer or the library to view the updates at www.seniorsoutdoors.org. Participation in Seniors Outdoors! activities by non-members is limited to two outings per year. Visitors who wish to actively participate are expected to join Seniors Outdoors! Participants (new & old) as we start the season please review the Guidelines for Outing Participants found on the SO! Web Site. It contains important information about our requirements and general alpine safety. Meeting Place Abbreviations: ACP: Animas City Park; TC: Trimble Crossing; Tam: Tamarron; DMR: Durango Mountain Resort; SRP: Santa Rita Park; RC: Rec Center Sun June 9 Hike Fourmile Falls. Hike to Fourmile falls, enjoying views of Eagle Peak on Moderate to the way. There are several falls to view in this area, so mileage depends on falls. Hard to SRP 8:30 am how much we explore. Carpool $9. lake 6 8 miles RSVP: Sandy Hoagland 247-3678 or [email protected] 800' Mon June 10 Cascade to Coal Bank: Hike to Engineer Plateau via Engineer Mtn. Trail from FS Hard work center near Cascade and then down to Coal Bank on the Pass Creek Trail.
    [Show full text]
  • Summits on the Air – ARM for USA - Colorado (WØC)
    Summits on the Air – ARM for USA - Colorado (WØC) Summits on the Air USA - Colorado (WØC) Association Reference Manual Document Reference S46.1 Issue number 3.2 Date of issue 15-June-2021 Participation start date 01-May-2010 Authorised Date: 15-June-2021 obo SOTA Management Team Association Manager Matt Schnizer KØMOS Summits-on-the-Air an original concept by G3WGV and developed with G3CWI Notice “Summits on the Air” SOTA and the SOTA logo are trademarks of the Programme. This document is copyright of the Programme. All other trademarks and copyrights referenced herein are acknowledged. Page 1 of 11 Document S46.1 V3.2 Summits on the Air – ARM for USA - Colorado (WØC) Change Control Date Version Details 01-May-10 1.0 First formal issue of this document 01-Aug-11 2.0 Updated Version including all qualified CO Peaks, North Dakota, and South Dakota Peaks 01-Dec-11 2.1 Corrections to document for consistency between sections. 31-Mar-14 2.2 Convert WØ to WØC for Colorado only Association. Remove South Dakota and North Dakota Regions. Minor grammatical changes. Clarification of SOTA Rule 3.7.3 “Final Access”. Matt Schnizer K0MOS becomes the new W0C Association Manager. 04/30/16 2.3 Updated Disclaimer Updated 2.0 Program Derivation: Changed prominence from 500 ft to 150m (492 ft) Updated 3.0 General information: Added valid FCC license Corrected conversion factor (ft to m) and recalculated all summits 1-Apr-2017 3.0 Acquired new Summit List from ListsofJohn.com: 64 new summits (37 for P500 ft to P150 m change and 27 new) and 3 deletes due to prom corrections.
    [Show full text]
  • Aliciella Sedifolia (Brandegee) J.M
    1. Species [12.53 1]: Aliciella sedifolia (Brandegee) J.M. Porter [syn. = Gilia sedifolia Brandeg.] (stonecrop gilia). 2. Status: Table 1 summarizes the current status of this plant by various ranking entity and defines the meaning of the status. Table 1. Current status of Aliciella sedifolia Entity Status Status Definition NatureServe G1 Critically Imperiled—At very high risk of extinction due to extreme rarity (often 5 or fewer populations), very steep declines, or other factors. CNHPa G1 Globally critically imperiled; typically 5 or fewer occurrences. CNHP S1 State critically imperiled; typically 5 or fewer occurrences. USDA Forest Sensitive Species identified by a regional forester for which population viability is a concern, as Service evidenced by: a) significant current or predicted downward trends in population numbers or density, or b) significant current or predicted downward trends in habitat capability that would reduce a species’ existing distribution. USDI FWSb Not Not federally recognized under the Endangered Species Act (ESA) as endangered, Listed threatened, proposed, or candidate species. a Colorado Natural Heritage Program. b US Department of Interior Fish and Wildlife Service. The 2012 U.S. Forest Service Planning Rule defines Species of Conservation Concern (SCC) as “a species, other than federally recognized threatened, endangered, proposed, or candidate species, that is known to occur in the plan area and for which the regional forester has determined that the best available scientific information indicates substantial concern about the species' capability to persist over the long- term in the plan area” (36 CFR 219.9). This overview was developed to summarize information relating to this species’ consideration to be listed as a SCC on the Rio Grande National Forest, and to aid in the development of plan components and monitoring objectives.
    [Show full text]
  • Texas Creek, (2,600 Acres)
    GRAND MESA, UNCOMPAHGRE, AND GUNNISON NATIONAL FOREST Agate Creek, (11,800 acres)............................................................................................................ 3 American Flag Mountain, (11,900 acres) ....................................................................................... 4 Baldy, (2,300 acres) ........................................................................................................................ 5 Battlements, (24,400 acres)............................................................................................................. 6 Beaver (3,700 acres) ....................................................................................................................... 7 Beckwiths, (18,400 acres) ............................................................................................................... 8 Calamity Basin, (12,500 acres) ....................................................................................................... 9 Cannibal Plateau, (14,500 acres) .................................................................................................. 10 Canyon Creek (10,900 acres); Canyon Creek/Antero, (1,700 acres) ........................................... 11 Carson, (6,000 acres) .................................................................................................................... 13 Castle, (9,400 acres) ...................................................................................................................... 14 Cataract,
    [Show full text]
  • Eagle's View of San Juan Mountains
    Eagle’s View of San Juan Mountains Aerial Photographs with Mountain Descriptions of the most attractive places of Colorado’s San Juan Mountains Wojtek Rychlik Ⓒ 2014 Wojtek Rychlik, Pikes Peak Photo Published by Mother's House Publishing 6180 Lehman, Suite 104 Colorado Springs CO 80918 719-266-0437 / 800-266-0999 [email protected] www.mothershousepublishing.com ISBN 978-1-61888-085-7 All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced without permission in writing from the copyright owner. Printed by Mother’s House Publishing, Colorado Springs, CO, U.S.A. Wojtek Rychlik www.PikesPeakPhoto.com Title page photo: Lizard Head and Sunshine Mountain southwest of Telluride. Front cover photo: Mount Sneffels and Yankee Boy Basin viewed from west. Acknowledgement 1. Aerial photography was made possible thanks to the courtesy of Jack Wojdyla, owner and pilot of Cessna 182S airplane. Table of Contents 1. Introduction 2 2. Section NE: The Northeast, La Garita Mountains and Mountains East of Hwy 149 5 San Luis Peak 13 3. Section N: North San Juan Mountains; Northeast of Silverton & West of Lake City 21 Uncompahgre & Wetterhorn Peaks 24 Redcloud & Sunshine Peaks 35 Handies Peak 41 4. Section NW: The Northwest, Mount Sneffels and Lizard Head Wildernesses 59 Mount Sneffels 69 Wilson & El Diente Peaks, Mount Wilson 75 5. Section SW: The Southwest, Mountains West of Animas River and South of Ophir 93 6. Section S: South San Juan Mountains, between Animas and Piedra Rivers 108 Mount Eolus & North Eolus 126 Windom, Sunlight Peaks & Sunlight Spire 137 7. Section SE: The Southeast, Mountains East of Trout Creek and South of Rio Grande 165 9.
    [Show full text]
  • Outing Description
    Day, Date, Outing Description Difficulty Departure Time Summer 2011 Outing Schedule Rating, & Total Length Departure Printer-friendly version & Place Elevation Logistics, rules, meeting places, and difficulty ratings Gain E-mail schedule changes and updates to: [email protected]. Schedule changes and trip updates are in red. Participation in Seniors Outdoors! activities by non-members is limited to two outings per year. Visitors who wish to actively participate are expected to join Seniors Outdoors! Please review the Guidelines for Outing Participants found on the SO! Website. These guidelines contain important information about Seniors Outdoors! requirements and general backcountry safety. Meeting Place Abbreviations: ACP: Animas City Park; TC: Trimble Crossing; Tam: Tamarron; DMR: Durango Mountain Resort; SRP: Santa Rita Park; RC: Rec Center MOUNTAIN EXPLORATIONS Hikes under the Mountain Exploration label will generally be hard hikes, but at a moderate pace, and with a limited number of participants. There will be stops for breathing, photography, looking at flowers and scenery, eating, etc., but the group stays with the leader. Expect an exploratory hike with some or all off trail, and sometimes with exposure and scrambling. Hikes will usually be in the range of 1,000 to 3,000 feet vertical, and 6 to 10 miles distance. Due to the exploratory nature of the hikes, when the outing is listed on the schedule only a general location will be given and without the customary details. The route for the day will be up to the trip leader. Return to vehicle times will be unpredictable. Wed Jun 8 WW hike: Colorado Trail to Gudys Rest.
    [Show full text]
  • Oreshoot Zoning in the Carlin-Type Betze Orebody, Goldstrike Mine, Eureka County, Nevada
    Oreshoot Zoning in the Carlin-type Betze Orebody, Goldstrike Mine, Eureka County, Nevada By Stephen G. Peters1, Gregory C. Ferdock2, Maria B. Woitsekhowskaya1, Robert Leonardson3, and Jerry Rahn3 Open-File Report 98–620 1998 This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey editorial standards or with the North American Stratigraphic Code. Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY 1U.S. Geological Survey, Reno Field Office, Mackay School of Mines, MS-176, University of Nevada, Reno, Nevada 89557-0047 2Department of Geological Sciences, Mackay School of Mines, University of Nevada, Reno, Nevada 89557-0047 3Mine Geology Department, Barrick Goldstrike Mines, Inc., P.O. Box 29, Elko, Nevada 89803. Oreshoot Zoning in the Carlin-type Betze Orebody, Goldstrike Mine, Eureka County, Nevada by Stephen G. Peters1, Gregory C. Ferdock2, Maria B. Woitsekhowskaya1, Robert Leonardson3, and Jerry Rahn3 1U.S. Geological Survey, Reno, Nevada. 2Mackay School of Mines, University of Nevada, Reno, Nevada. 3Barrick Goldstrike Mines, Inc., Elko, Nevada Abstract Field and laboratory investigations of the giant Betze gold orebody, the largest Carlin-type deposit known, in the north-central Carlin trend, Nevada document that the orebody is composed of individual high-grade oreshoots that contain different geologic, mineralogic, and textural characteristics. The orebody is typical of many structurally controlled Carlin-type deposits, and is hosted in thin-bedded, impure carbonate or limy siltstone, breccia bodies, and intrusive or calc-silicate rock.
    [Show full text]
  • Colorado Rare Plant Conservation Strategy
    Plants have too long been hidden in plain sight. The prospect of continued threats to the nation’s plant life, coupled with the large proportion of the flora already at risk, argues that now is the time to bring plants out from COLO R A D O RA R E P L A nt the background, and to put the conservation needs of our nation’s flora COnsERVATION StrATEgy squarely into view. -Stein and Gravuer, NatureServe, 2008 Printed on recycled paper. BY: THE RARE PLAnt COnsERVATION InITIATIVE | MAY 2009 Plants are essential to both wildlife and humans through provision of key services such as food, shelter, fiber, and medicine ... protecting our wild flora goes to the heart of the human condition. Yet without focused conservation attention to the growing plight of the nation’s plant species, we are at risk of losing significant portions of our wild heritage, and the ecological resilience that comes with that diversity. -Stein and Gravuer, NatureServe, 2008 North Park phacelia © Frank Weston RECOMMENDED CITATION Neely, B., S. Panjabi, E. Lane, P. Lewis, C. Dawson, A. Kratz, B. Kurzel, T. Hogan, J. Handwerk, S. Krishnan, J. Neale, and N. Ripley. 2009. Colorado Rare Plant Conservation Strategy. Developed by the Colorado Rare Plant Conservation Initiative. The Nature Conservancy, Boulder, Colorado. 117 pp. AUTHORS Carol Dawson, Bureau of Land Management Jill Handwerk, Colorado Natural Heritage Program Tim Hogan, University of Colorado Herbarium Andrew Kratz, U.S. Forest Service Sarada Krishnan, Colorado Native Plant Society and Denver Botanic Gardens Brian Kurzel, Colorado Natural Areas Program Eric Lane, Colorado Department of Agriculture Paige Lewis, The Nature Conservancy Jennifer Neale, Denver Botanic Gardens Betsy Neely, The Nature Conservancy Susan Spackman Panjabi, Colorado Natural Heritage Program Nicola Ripley, Betty Ford Alpine Gardens COLORADO RARE PLANT CONSERVATION INITIATIVE MEMBERS David Anderson, Colorado Natural Heritage Program (CNHP) Rob Billerbeck, Colorado Natural Areas Program (CNAP) Leo P.
    [Show full text]