Corn Breeding A

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Corn Breeding A Agronomy Publications Agronomy 1988 Corn Breeding A. R. Hallauer U.S. Department of Agriculture, [email protected] Wilbert A. Russell Iowa State University K. R. Lamkey U.S. Department of Agriculture, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://lib.dr.iastate.edu/agron_pubs Part of the Agricultural Science Commons, Agronomy and Crop Sciences Commons, and the Plant Breeding and Genetics Commons The ompc lete bibliographic information for this item can be found at http://lib.dr.iastate.edu/ agron_pubs/259. For information on how to cite this item, please visit http://lib.dr.iastate.edu/ howtocite.html. This Book Chapter is brought to you for free and open access by the Agronomy at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Agronomy Publications by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Corn Breeding Abstract Corn (Zea mays L.) breeding for hybrid development was begun in the early 1900s with the work of Shull (1909), East (1908), and others, but a primitive type of breeding was conducted for thousands of years by the American Indians before the European colonists began settlement in the New World. The .SU . Corn Belt dents were derived from crosses that included germ plasm of the northeastern flint and southern dent or gourdseed types, beginning about 1850, with subsequent selection that developed the U.S. Corn Belt dents. Open-pollinated cultivars, such as Reid Yellow Dent, Krug, Learning, and Lancaster Sure Crop were developed by a type of mass selection that was based on plant, ear, and grain type. This early work, which was done primarily by farmers and seedsmen, provided the germp1asm sources from which were developed the inbred parental lines that were used to produce the first double-cross hybrids used in the USA. Even to the present time, relatively little eg rm plasm from other countries has been used in corn breeding programs in the USA (Brown, 1975). Disciplines Agricultural Science | Agronomy and Crop Sciences | Plant Breeding and Genetics Comments This is a chapter from Haullauer, A. R., W. A. Russell, and K. R. Lamkey. 1988. Corn Breeding. In G. F. Sprague and J. W. Dudley (eds.) Corn and Corn Improvement. Agronomy 18:463-564. Am. Soc. of Agron., Madison, WI. Posted with permission. Rights Works produced by employees of the U.S. Government as part of their official duties are not copyrighted within the U.S. The onc tent of this document is not copyrighted. This book chapter is available at Iowa State University Digital Repository: http://lib.dr.iastate.edu/agron_pubs/259 Published 1988 8 Corn Breeding l A. R. HALLAUER USDA-ARS Ames, Iowa WILBERT A. RUSSELL Iowa State University Ames, Iowa K.R.LAMKEY USDA-ARS Ames, Iowa Corn (Zea mays L.) breeding for hybrid development was begun in the early 1900s with the work of Shull (1909), East (1908), and others, but a primitive type of breeding was conducted for thousands of years by the American Indians before the European colonists began settlement in the New World. The U.S. Corn Belt dents were derived from crosses that included germ plasm of the northeastern flint and southern dent or gourd­ seed types, beginning about 1850, with subsequent selection that devel­ oped the U.S. Corn Belt dents. Open-pollinated cultivars, such as Reid Yellow Dent, Krug, Learning, and Lancaster Sure Crop were developed by a type of mass selection that was based on plant, ear, and grain type. This early work, which was done primarily by farmers and seedsmen, provided the germp1asm sources from which were developed the inbred parental lines that were used to produce the first double-cross hybrids used in the USA. Even to the present time, relatively little germ plasm from other countries has been used in corn breeding programs in the USA (Brown, 1975). Breeding procedures were used to improve and develop new strains of the open-pollinated cultivars in the late 1800s and early 1900s before the development of inbred lines for hybrid seed production was begun. These breeding procedures included varietal hybridization, mass selec­ tion, and ear-to-row selection. Descriptions of the procedures have been published in earlier years, and results from a few studies were summarized by Sprague and Eberhart (1977). These procedures were not successful to effect yield improvements. In some instances, varietal hybridization IJoint contribution of the USDA-ARS, and Journal Paper no. J-12562 of the Iowa Agric. and Home Econ. Exp. Stn., Ames, IA 5001 I. Project no. 2778. Copyright 1988 © ASA-CSSA-SSSA, 677 South Segoe Road, Madison, WI 537II, USA. Corn and Corn Improvement-Agronomy Monograph no. 18, 3rd edition. 463 464 HALLAUER ET AL. gave crosses that produced better than the higher-yielding parent, but the procedure was not accepted widely for commercial use. Selection pro­ grams were successful in producing numerous strains that varied for ma­ turity, plant type, ear and grain type, and pest resistance. Corn shows conducted at the start of the 20th century also caused selection for a distinct ear and grain appearance. Close selection to type, however, may have caused some inbreeding, which may have been the primary reason that yield improvements were not realized. Mass selection and ear-to­ row selection were gradually discontinued as inbred development for hybrid use became the accepted method. Modifications to mass selection (Gardner, 1961) and ear-to-row selection (Lonnquist, 1964) have been used to enhance the effectiveness of these selection methods for improv­ ing yield in breeding populations. Results of breeding studies by Shull, East, and Jones in the early 1900s led to the establishment of programs at many U.S. agricultural experiment stations and by the USDA fQr the development and evalu­ ation of inbred lines and hybrids during the period of 1915 to 1925. Corn breeding as a private commercial enterprise came a few years later. It was the 1930s before farmer use of hybrid seed became an acceptable practice; hybrid corn occupied approximately 100% of the corn area in Iowa by 1943, 90% of the corn area in the U.S. Corn Belt, but only 60% of the corn area for the entire USA (Fig. 8-1). Double-cross hybrids were the predominant type in the USA until about 1960 when the use of single crosses began to increase. Single crosses became the predominant type in a few years, with considerably fewer hectares being planted to related­ line single crosses, three-way crosses, and double crosses. Corn breeding for the development of inbred lines and hybrids in other parts of the world expanded rapidly after World War II. Corn has proved to be a flexible species amenable to selection such that progress 100 _-0 Iowa Corn Belt _--- "" /' _-0--- 90 'i' 0_--0--- USA , / '& 80 , / Z 70 , I 0 i= 60 / / a. g 50 cC J'/ I 11..40 0 , I w 30 , " l- cC ,/ a: 20 , I / I 10 ,/;)1 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 YEARS 1930-1960 Fig. 8-1. Rate of acceptance of double-cross hybrids in Iowa, the U.S. Corn Belt, and the USA. CORN BREEDING 465 has been achieved to develop types adapted to many areas where it was not grown or was relatively unimportant in earlier years. An excellent example has been the tremendous expansion in some European countries, made possible by the selection of earlier maturity, better adapted cultivars that can be grown successfully in areas where such was not feasible 40 years ago (Trifunovic, 1978). Some inbred development and evaluation were done in a few European countries before 1940, and such programs were expanded greatly after 1945. In the first period of this expansion, materials from the USA were evaluated and some U.S. hybrids were used. Subsequently, European and U.S. lines in hybrid combinations were de­ veloped and these helped to expand the corn-growing area and to give higher yields. The European lines introduced greater cold tolerance and adaptation for earlier maturity and the U.S. lines added improved yield and standability. These combinations permitted the expansion of hybrid corn into central Europe. In France, for example, the hectarage has in­ creased more than five times from pre-World War II to the present time, and France is now a leading corn producer in Europe. Corn has become the most important feed crop in southern and central Europe. Corn ranks second to wheat in total production among the world's cereal crops (CIMMYT, 1984). World corn production now normally exceeds 400 million t. During the period 1970-72 to 1981-83, world corn production increased about 120 million t, which represents a 42% increase in the world supplies at a rate of 3.1 % yc I. More than 50% of the total world area planted with corn is in Latin America, Africa, and south and southwest Asia, but probably <25% of the total grain production is in this area (Wellhausen, 1978). Hybrids are the primary type grown in Argentina, South Africa, and parts of Brazil, but the remainder of the area uses open-pollinated cuitivars, improved synthetics, variety crosses, and hybrids. In some areas where corn grain is used primarily for human consumption, considerable work has been done to improve protein qual­ ity through the use of opaque-2. As the technology is improved, it seems likely that hybrid types will become more important in most of the trop­ ical and subtropical areas. Corn grain yields in the USA have increased from approximately 1.3 Mg ha- I in 1930 to 7.5 Mg ha- l in 1985 (Fig.
Recommended publications
  • What Is Still Limiting the Deployment of Cellulosic Ethanol? Analysis of the Current Status of the Sector
    applied sciences Review What is still Limiting the Deployment of Cellulosic Ethanol? Analysis of the Current Status of the Sector Monica Padella *, Adrian O’Connell and Matteo Prussi European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Directorate C-Energy, Transport and Climate, Energy Efficiency and Renewables Unit C.2-Via E. Fermi 2749, 21027 Ispra, Italy; [email protected] (A.O.); [email protected] (M.P.) * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 16 September 2019; Accepted: 15 October 2019; Published: 24 October 2019 Abstract: Ethanol production from cellulosic material is considered one of the most promising options for future biofuel production contributing to both the energy diversification and decarbonization of the transport sector, especially where electricity is not a viable option (e.g., aviation). Compared to conventional (or first generation) ethanol production from food and feed crops (mainly sugar and starch based crops), cellulosic (or second generation) ethanol provides better performance in terms of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions savings and low risk of direct and indirect land-use change. However, despite the policy support (in terms of targets) and significant R&D funding in the last decade (both in EU and outside the EU), cellulosic ethanol production appears to be still limited. The paper provides a comprehensive overview of the status of cellulosic ethanol production in EU and outside EU, reviewing available literature and highlighting technical and non-technical barriers that still limit its production at commercial scale. The review shows that the cellulosic ethanol sector appears to be still stagnating, characterized by technical difficulties as well as high production costs.
    [Show full text]
  • Corn - an A-Maizing Plant
    Corn - An A-Maizing Plant Grade Level: 4-6 Approximate Length of Activity: Two to three class periods Objectives: Teacher: 1. Guide students in a discussion on corn production. 2. Help students understand the history of corn production. Students: 1. Locate and label the states on a U.S. map that make up the "Corn Belt". 2. Become familiar with the parts of the corn kernel. 3. Recognize products made from corn used in our daily lives. 4. Be able to distinguish, through dissection, the four different parts of a corn kernel. Michigan Content Standards: (Social Studies) II.2.2; II.2.3; IV.2.3 Introduction: The Corn Belt is a group of states where most of the corn in the United States is produced. Illinois, Iowa, Nebraska, and Minnesota produce 50 percent of all the corn grown in the US. Other major corn growing states include Indiana, Wisconsin, Michigan, South Dakota, Kansas, Missouri, Kentucky, and Ohio. These 12 states make up the Corn Belt. Corn is the major feed grain grown by farmers in the U.S., leading all other crops in value and volume of production. Corn is a major component in foods like cereals, peanut butter, and snack foods. An ear of corn has an average of 16 rows with 800 kernels. A pound of corn consists of approximately 1,300 kernels. An acre (about the size of a football field) of corn, yielding 100 bushels, produces approximately 7,280,000 kernels. Most of the weight of a bushel of corn is the starch, oil, protein, and fiber, with some natural moisture.
    [Show full text]
  • Insights Into the Genetic and Environmental Bases of Mycotoxin Contamination in Kenyan Maize
    INSIGHTS INTO THE GENETIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL BASES OF MYCOTOXIN CONTAMINATION IN KENYAN MAIZE A Dissertation Presented To the Faculty of the Graduate School of Cornell University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Samuel Kilonzo Mutiga January 2015 © 2015 Samuel Kilonzo Mutiga ii INSIGHTS INTO THE GENETIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL BASES OF MYCOTOXIN CONTAMINATION IN KENYAN MAIZE Samuel Kilonzo Mutiga, Ph.D. Cornell University, 2015 Mycotoxins are toxic fungal secondary metabolites that contaminate an estimated 25% of foods globally. Aflatoxin and fumonisin are major mycotoxins that contaminate maize in tropical countries. Kenya’s frequent aflatoxicosis outbreaks and the associated human fatality rates have received global attention. The objective of this dissertation was to investigate the extent and the drivers for mycotoxin contamination in Kenyan maize. Between May 2009 and March 2010, surveys were conducted in three provinces (Rift Valley, Western and Nyanza) of western Kenya, the country’s grain basket and a region where mycotoxin outbreak had not been recognized. Aflatoxin contamination above the regulatory limit of 10 ppb was observed in 15% of the flour samples that had been collected from the patrons of local mills. Drought and monocropping were identified as drivers for increased aflatoxin contamination. A longitudinal survey in farmers’ storage sheds and at local mills in Western Province revealed vulnerability of the most popular varieties to mycotoxins. Surveys were conducted in 10 districts of Eastern Province during an aflatoxin outbreak in 2010. Aflatoxin contamination above 10 ppb was observed in 39% of the flour samples from patrons (n=1500) of local mills, while 37% were above the 1 ppm regulatory limit for fumonisin.
    [Show full text]
  • Conversion of Corn-Kernel Fiber in Conventional Fuel-Ethanol Plants National Corn to Ethanol Research Center
    Project No. 0340-19-03 (short version) November 11, 2018 Conversion of Corn-Kernel Fiber in Conventional Fuel-Ethanol Plants National Corn to Ethanol Research Center Executive Summary Ethanol derived from corn-kernel fiber is qualified as cellulosic biofuel since its production results in a 60% reduction in greenhouse gas production relative to a 2005 baseline for petroleum fuels according to the Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) (U.S. EPA). A conventional fuel-ethanol plant can achieve a potential 9% increase in ethanol production (compared with the starch based ethanol), if they can successfully convert and ferment the cellulose and hemicellulose (xylose and galactose) in corn-kernel fiber; and achieve an additional 3% increase in ethanol production if they can ferment the arabinose derived from hemicellulose. Although complete conversion of all the corn-kernel fiber sugars to ethanol (total of 12% increase) is not possible because some byproducts are always produced, the economic benefits through the production of cellulosic ethanol for a conventional fuel-ethanol plant are much greater than 12%. Commercial technologies have been developed to optimize the conversion of corn-kernel fiber to ethanol, and they are currently available in three categories: (1) in situ technologies, in which fiber is converted to ethanol simultaneously with starch conversion, (2) technologies in which fiber is physically separated from other components of the corn kernel followed by processing of the fiber-rich material independently of the starch process train, and (3) technologies in which post-distillation residual solids from the conventional starch-based ethanol process provide the feedstock for conversion of the fiber fraction into ethanol.
    [Show full text]
  • AP-42, CH 9.9.7: Corn Wet Milling
    9.9.7 Corn Wet Milling 9.9.7.1 General1 Establishments in corn wet milling are engaged primarily in producing starch, syrup, oil, sugar, and byproducts such as gluten feed and meal, from wet milling of corn and sorghum. These facilities may also produce starch from other vegetables and grains, such as potatoes and wheat. In 1994, 27 corn wet milling facilities were reported to be operating in the United States. 9.9.7.2 Process Description1-4 The corn wet milling industry has grown in its 150 years of existence into the most diversified and integrated of the grain processing industries. The corn refining industry produces hundreds of products and byproducts, such as high fructose corn syrup (HFCS), corn syrup, starches, animal feed, oil, and alcohol. In the corn wet milling process, the corn kernel (see Figure 9.9.7-1) is separated into 3 principal parts: (1) the outer skin, called the bran or hull; (2) the germ, containing most of the oil; and (3) the endosperm (gluten and starch). From an average bushel of corn weighing 25 kilograms (kg) (56 pounds [lb]), approximately 14 kg (32 lb) of starch is produced, about 6.6 kg (14.5 lb) of feed and feed products, about 0.9 kg (2 lb) of oil, and the remainder is water. The overall corn wet milling process consists of numerous steps or stages, as shown schematically in Figure 9.9.7-2. Shelled corn is delivered to the wet milling plant primarily by rail and truck and is unloaded into a receiving pit.
    [Show full text]
  • What Is Popcorn?
    What is Popcorn? Who doesn't love popcorn? Popcorn dates back to the early 1600s and is related to aztec indian ceremonies however it is mainly used today as a popular movie snack. Popcorn is produced in the central part of the US including Iowa, Nebraska, Kansas, Missouri, Illinois, Ohio, Kentucky, Michigan and Indiana. It can also be eaten in many different recipes and events and is a common snack for people trying to eat a healthier diet as 1 cup of air popped corn contains 31 calories, 1 gram of Protein, 6 grams of Carbs, 1 gram of Fiber and a tiny bit of Fat. Have you ever thought about how it pops or what's inside the hard kernel? This lesson is to help give you some of this information. Popcorn is a whole grain. Popcorn differs from other types of corn because its hull is the right thickness to allow it to burst open. Other types of corn include sweet, dent, and flint. The corn kernel is made up of 3 different components: the germ, endosperm and pericarp (hull or bran). Endosperm is the starch and is white or yellow in color, it is also ​ ​ a carbohydrate that provides energy to the germ, the living part of the kernel. The ​ ​ pericarp or hull is the outer shell and is made of cellulose. The hull can be many colors ​ ​ ​ on different types of corn. Along with the 3 different components, each kernel contains some moisture inside a circle of soft starch all within the hull. It needs to have between 13.5 and 14% moisture in order to pop.
    [Show full text]
  • Tapping the Treasure
    RefinedRefined Corn Corn Products Products DefinitionsDefinitions cont.cont. Definitions Crystalline Fructose TappingTapping thethe Starch, Unmodified (Native) Crystalline fructose is made by separating the fructose from glucose in high fructose One of nature’s preeminent renewable resources and a mainstay of our food and corn syrup. It is provided in crystalline form and used primarily as a replacement industrial economy, starch is a complex carbohydrate composed of chains of glucose for sucrose in dry mix, baking and snack food applications. molecules. Basic consumer necessities such as paper and textiles are examples of its use in major industrial applications, where it is used in sizing, surface coating and Corn Oil TreasureTreasure adhesives. Cornstarch serves as the raw material from which a host of products are Corn oil is made from the oil-rich germ of the corn kernel. It is used mainly in The sight of tasseled corn swaying gently in the wind is a familiar scene in made, including baby powder, laundry spray starch and cooking starch. It is also cooking oil, salad oil and margarine. High in mono and poly unsaturated fats, corn summer in many regions of the country. In fact, corn is the most abundant crop found in other common household items such as matches, batteries, diapers and a oil is a top choice for reducing saturated fat and trans fat in numerous food products. produced in the United States today. It accounts for more planted acres and wide variety of food products. Corn Gluten Feed has a higher value than any other commodity. Starch, Modified Corn gluten feed is the protein and fiber co-product of corn processing.
    [Show full text]
  • Sweet Corn Processing
    SWEET CORN PROCESSING 1 INTRODUCTION CEREAL GRAINS Cereal grains (or simply grains) are small, hard and edible dry seeds that grow on grass-like plants called cereals. They are a staple food in most countries, and provide more food energy worldwide than any other food group, by far. Grains have played a major role in human history, and grain agriculture is one of the main advancements that fueled the development of civilization. They are eaten by humans, and also used to feed and fatten up livestock. Then grains can be processed into various different food products. 2 INTRODUCTION Cereals form a major portion of human diet and are an important source of starch and other dietary carbohydrates (dietary fibre), which play an important role in the energy requirement and nutrient intake of human. 3 TYPES OF CEREAL GRAINS IMAGE NAME DESCRIPTION Rice is an excellent source of calories because of its starch content. It contains 75-80% of starch, 7% of protein, 0.4-0.8% Rice (Oryza sativa). of lipids and 12% of water. Rice oats protein is of highly digestible quality and contains lysine 4.1mg/100g of protein higher than wheat. It is highly nutritious and important for malting. Mostly used as a breakfast cereal with Barley. oat, it is also used as a feed for animals. It is mostly grown on land which is not capable of growing wheat. 4 TYPES OF CEREAL GRAINS IMAGE NAME DESCRIPTION Highly nutritious and used as a feed for livestock. Sorghum Mostly grown Asia and Africa, wheat porridge is popular in Millet China, Russia and Germany.
    [Show full text]
  • Stability Analysis of Kernel Quality Traits in Exotic-Derived Doubled Haploid Maize Lines
    Agronomy Publications Agronomy 3-2019 Stability Analysis of Kernel Quality Traits in Exotic- Derived Doubled Haploid Maize Lines Adam Vanous Iowa State University, [email protected] Candice Gardner United States Department of Agriculture, [email protected] Michael Blanco United States Department of Agriculture Adam Martin-Schwarze Iowa State University Jinyu Wang Iowa State University, [email protected] SeFoe nelloxtw pa thige fors aaddndition addal aitutionhorsal works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/agron_pubs Part of the Agriculture Commons, Agronomy and Crop Sciences Commons, and the Plant Breeding and Genetics Commons The ompc lete bibliographic information for this item can be found at https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/ agron_pubs/536. For information on how to cite this item, please visit http://lib.dr.iastate.edu/ howtocite.html. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Agronomy at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Agronomy Publications by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Stability Analysis of Kernel Quality Traits in Exotic-Derived Doubled Haploid Maize Lines Abstract Variation in kernel composition across maize (Zea mays L.) germplasm is affected by a combination of the plant’s genotype, the environment in which it is grown, and the interaction between these two elements. Adapting exotic germplasm to the US Corn Belt is highly dependent on the plant’s genotype, the environment where it is grown, and the interaction between these components. Phenotypic plasticity is ill-defined when specific exotic germplasm is moved over large latitudinal distances and for the adapted variants being created.
    [Show full text]
  • ANTHOCYANINS from ROSE MAIZE (Zea Mays L.) GRAINS
    ANTHOCYANINS FROM ROSE MAIZE (Zea mays L.) GRAINS Lucía Barrientos Ramírez, Hilda E. Ramírez Salcedo, María Fernanda Fernández Aulis, Mario Alberto Ruíz López, Arturo Navarro Ocaña and J. Jesús Vargas Radillo SUMMARY Here we present the anthocyanin composition of grains of Peonidin, and Pelargonidin, while HPLC profile revealed rose corn (Zea mays L.). Extraction was performed using that the most abundant anthocyanin was Cyanidin-3-(6-mal- methanol:water:HCl in an ultrasound bath for 20min. Antho- onyl-glucoside), a malonic derivative of Cyanidin. The re- cyanins were isolated from maize using the combination of sults increase available data regarding the presence of these column chromatography and HPTLC plates, whereas HPLC- compounds in varieties of pigmented corn grains, and thus UV/Vis and HPLC-MS were used for analysis and identifi- help to promote the consumption of these varieties for their cation. Compounds found include the glycosides Cyanidin, beneficial health effects. Introduction or more sugar molecules (gly- for cosmetic or pharmaceutical Traditionally, it is used to cosylated type), and may also applications (Ignat et al., make tortillas, pozole, gordi- The immediate predecessor contain acyl radicals in the 2011). They also have func- tas, and sweet atole (Ron of domesticated maize, the form of aliphatic organic acid tional properties, since they Parra et al., 2006). The pres- Teocintle, is considered native derivatives linked to sugar cause a slow digestion of ent study aims to assess the of Mesoamerica and, thus, (acylated type) which show starch that has been associat- types and characteristics of Mexico is considered to be the greater stability at different ed with beneficial health ef- anthocyanin metabolites in this origin of maize (Zea mays L., pH levels (Eng et al., 2017).
    [Show full text]
  • Pericarp Thickness, Tenderness, and Freeze-Drying of Super-Sweet Maize a .Thesis Submitted to The. Graduate Division of the Univ
    PERICARP THICKNESS, TENDERNESS, AND FREEZE-DRYING OF SUPER-SWEET MAIZE A .THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE. GRADUATE DIVISION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE IN HORTICULTURE AUGUST 1980 By Glenn Mitsuji Ito Thesis Comittee: James L. Brewbaker, Chairman Richard A. Criley James H. Moy ii We certify that we have read this thesis and that in our opinion it is satisfactory in scope and quality as a thesis for the degree of Master of Science in Horticulture. iii ABSTRACT Mass selection for tenderness was conducted on the variety 'Hawaiian Super-sweet No. 9' corn which was found to vary widely in tenderness. Selection was carried out on a 10 % selection intensity using criteria of pericarp thickness and bite-test. Selection was carried out for 3 cycles by pericarp thickness measurements and for 4 cycles by bite-testing. All cycles of selection were evaluated by both bite-testing and by pericarp thickness measurements. In the first cycle of selection where pericarp thickness and bite-test measurements were taken on the same ear, a signi­ ficant product moment correlation coefficient [ r = 98%) was found between bite-test scores and pericarp thickness measurements. Pericarp thickness evaluation on the cycles of selection indicated that pericarp thickness decreased by a greater margin when selected for by pericarp thickness than by bite-testing. However, when all cycles of selection were evaluated by bite-testing, the bite-test scores dropped more significantly for selection by bite-testing than by pericarp thickness measurements. There was no significant interaction between the germinal and abgerminal posi­ tions measured on the pericarp and the cycles of selection.
    [Show full text]
  • Products of Corn
    NCGA CORN CURRICULUM - WWW.NCGA.COM UNIT 9: FEED YOUR FACE! LESSON 1: EXAMPLE 1 Products of Corn Cornstarch Corn Syrup Industrial Uses Acids, commercial (lactic, acetic, Industrial Uses Industrial Uses gluconic, etc.) Abrasive paper and cloth Adhesives (plasticizing agent) Adhesives Adhesives (glues, mucilages, gums, etc.) Chemicals Amino acids Batteries, dry cell Dyes and inks Chemicals (calcium, lactate, sodium Binder or binding agents Explosives lactate, etc.) Board (corrugating, laminating, solid fiber- Leather tanning (chrome process) Citric board, cardboard) Metal plating Dyes Boiler compounds Paper, glassine and parchment Electroplating and galvanizing Bookbinding Plasticizer Enzymes Briquettes Ceramics (as clay binder) Polish, shoe Lactic acid polymers Chemicals Cleaners, detergents Rayon (viscose process) Leather tanning Coatings on wood, metal and paper Textiles, for finishing Lysine Color carrier (in paper and textile printing) Theatrical makeup Mannitol Cord polishing, sizing Tobacco and tobacco products Paper manufacturing Cork products Rubber (cold process) Crayon and chalk (as a binder) Sizing materials Dispersing and standard- izing agent Food, Drug Uses; Sorbitol Dressing, surgical Textiles, dyeing and finishing Dyes (as a bodying agent, carrier diluent, liquid or dried form Threonime etc.) Baby foods Tryptophan Fermentation processes Bakery products (bread, rolls, biscuits, Fiberglass size doughnuts, pies, cakes, cookies, pretzels, Fireworks etc.) Food, Drug Uses Insecticide powders Beverages, brewed (beer, ale, etc.)
    [Show full text]