LANDSCAPE & VISUAL ASSESSMENT

LDO SITE ROYAL BATH & WEST SHOWGROUND

Revison C - 20-10-2014

STANIFORTH architects Ltd Architects & Masterplanners

1 1. Executive Summary The LDO zone heights range from 94m in the south to 107m . - . in the north. The proposal does not break the skyline and is - \ 1.0 A Landscape and Visual Assessment (LVA) has been carried .. in scale with its setting. The key view from Prestleigh, from out following standard procedure. M - the A371, is well screened and landscaping will reinforce this - - t hedgerow to enhance its setting. 1.1 The site lies within the north of the of -·----...-'''~ ,- ~~\) the ‘ Scarplands’ (NCA 140) close to the boundary with 1 1.4 Landscape response to the impacts. ‘Mid - Hills (NCA143) & (NCA 142) • ~ \ Lo6:IT: ) The landscape and built form proposals result from the - , ) ~ ·~ ~, . . to the west. ‘’ lies approximately 2 kilometers to () <:..:, ~-- (1'"' ' ' analysis of the landscape and visual impacts .The majority of the north.This varied landscape is a result of the complicated existing hedgerows will be retained and reinforced. geologies within this area.

The building sizes have been carefully considered with 1-2 1.2 At a local level, the site lies within the Lias lowlands & ridges <)'"'" • storey (smaller buildings) to the perimeter and road frontage. - ~ Principle Character Area and within this is the ‘Whitelake - -0 .,. \: \ ) The medium size units will be more central set against the Lowlands Landscape Character area. The Whitelake Lowlands backdrop of the existing showground buildings. area is described as: , ~~ . \. -,,_),g-♦ The internal layout of the LDO has been designed creating • Gently-undulating farmland a structure of new swales with screen planting. The layout has -- ~~~ ~ --" ~- been carefully considered to re-establish the hedgerow pattern ,~~ - • Very open areas with low hedges and create distinct plots within the zone .Mounding and bunds • will be used for specific plot screening, as the site develops. • More enclosed areas with small hedge arable and pasture in distinct zones figure 1 .LDO site location within the showground site 1.5 Change within the showground context.

• Large villages and showground are locally prominent The development will conserve and enhance the character of the showground and the site. The additional landscape • Views of surrounding ridges measures will provide effective screens, together with an overall improvement of landscape character, and wildlife • Lias Limestone building habitat potential in a landscape where it is declining.

The site itself partly reflects this character, in its openness The provision of landscape proposals and management but lacks the enclosure provided by the hedges. This character plan will ensure that the scheme enhances and respects the has been eroded over time by the nature of the showgrounds previous planning framework for the overall site. functional requirements.

1.3 Views and Visibility. The site is locally prominent but after a distance of 1.5km the visual impact on the views become merged within the existing Northern part of the site viewed toward Prestleigh context of the showground.

2 2. Introduction

2.1 This Landscape and Visual Assessment, prepared by 2.2 The statement is structured as follows Staniforth Architects Ltd relates to a previous planning framework approval dated March 2011 for the Royal • Landscape and Visual Methodology. Bath and West Showground, in Somerset • Baseline Site Description .It has been prepared to consider the potential effects of • Local Landscape Character the proposed LDO (Local Development Order) on the Royal • Baseline Visual Analysis Bath and West Showground and the surrounding area in the • Development Description context of the previous planning framework • Landscape effects • Visual Effects The main objectives of the LVA are as follows: • Mitigation • Conclusion 1 To identify, evaluate and describe the current landscape character of the site and its surroundings and also any 2.3 A baseline landscape assessment was carried out to notable individual landscape features within the site; determine the current features and character of the landscape within a study area of approximately 20km. This 2 To determine the sensitivity of the landscape to the type of involved an initial desktop study of: development proposed;

• Ordnance survey maps at 1:50,000, 1:25,000 scales 3 To identify potential visual receptors (i.e. people who would • Aerial photographs of the site and surrounding area be able to see the development) and evaluate their sensitivity • Datasets for rural designations from the MAGIC website to the type of changes proposed; and to map these. (Multi Agency) • Geographic Information for the Countryside) 4 To identify and describe any effects of the development in • Relevant planning policy. so far as they affect the landscape and/or views of it and to • National and regional scale landscape character evaluate the magnitude of change due to these effects. assessments • Following the desk top study a field study and photographic 5 Mitigation and Residual Effects surveys were undertaken in March 2014-May 2014. Best practice in the assessment of the effects of development requires that the significance of potential effects be assessed, mitigation proposals identified and the residual effect (with mitigation in place) then reassessed to demonstrate the effectiveness of the mitigation proposed.

6. It is considered that the construction works would have no adverse effect on the views .

3 3. Landscape and Visual resource relies on the adoption of certain basic principles 3.10 The degree to which a particular landscape type or area can Methodology. about the positive (or beneficial ) and negative (or adverse) accommodate change arising from a particular development, effects of change . Due to the inherently dynamic nature of without detrimental effects on its character, will vary with the landscape, change arising from a development may not existing land use, pattern and scale of the landscape., 3.1 A Landscape and Visual Assessment of the LDO has been necessarily be significant. Visual effects relate to the changes visual enclosure or openness of views, distribution of visual conducted broadly based on ‘Guidelines for Landscape that arise in the composition of available views as a result of receptors and the scope for mitigation which would be and Visual Impact Assessment, 3rd Edition’ (‘GLVIA3’) changes to the landscape, to people’s responses to these, in character with the existing landscape is known as the published by the LI & IEMA, 2013 Landscape Character and to the overall effects with respect to visual amenity. sensitivity or capacity of the landscape resource. Variations of Assessment Guidelines for & Scotland ‘Published these characteristics within the local landscape and within the by The Countryside Agency (now ) and 3.5 Assessment and design are part of an iterative process . An site need to be identified. There is no standard methodology Scottish Natural Heritage .2002 has also been taken into iterative approach enables site planning and detailed design for the quantification of the magnitude or scale of landscape consideration. to be informed by the ongoing assessment .The amended effects . However, it is generally based on the scale or degree proposals then feed back into the assessment process, until of change to the landscape resource, the nature of the effect 3.2 These documents do not provide a prescriptive approach the preferred design solution is reached. This approach has and its duration. but identify principles and good practice. The methodology been adopted here for the landscape design. is described below and is based on this approach. 3.11 The sensitivity of visual receptors and views will be dependent 3.6 The purpose of mitigation is to avoid, reduce and on the location and context of the viewpoints and the 3.3 GLVIA 3 states that the Landscape impact assessment, where possible remedy adverse effects arising from the expectations and occupation or activity of the receptor. in common with any assessment of environmental development .Mitigation is not solely concerned with effects, includes a combination of objective and subjective “damage limitation” but may also consider measures that 3.12 The most sensitive receptors include outdoor recreational judgements, and it is therefore important that a structured could compensate for unavoidable residual effects. This is facilities (especially including public rights of way ), whose and consistent approach is used . It is necessary to the case at the showground LDO site. attention or interest may be focused on the landscape, differentiate between judgements that involve a degree of communities (where development results in changes in subjective opinion (as in the assessment of landscape value ) 3.7 Mitigation measures are generally more effective if they are the landscape setting or valued views enjoyed by the from those that are normally more objective and quantifiable. designed as an integral part of the iterative process referred community) and the occupiers of residential properties with GLVIA 3 also states “Landscape and visual assessments to above. views affected by the development. are separate, although linked procedures .The landscape baseline ,its analysis and the assessment of landscape 3.9 Following the baseline landscape studies, the assessment 3.13 The least sensitive receptors are likely to be people at their effects all contribute to the baseline for visual assessment stage includes the systematic identification of potential place of work, or engaged in similar activities such as the use studies .The assessment of the potential effect on the impacts, prediction of their magnitude and assessment of of roads, whose attention may be focused on their work or landscape is carried out as an effect on an environmental their significance. In the context of landscape and visual activity and who therefore may be potentially less susceptible resource, i.e the landscape . Visual effects are assessed as assessment, the term landscape character is used . to changes in the view. one or the interrelated effects on population”. This refers to distinct and recognisable pattern of elements that occurs consistently in a particular type of landscape, 3.14 The magnitude or scale of visual change described by 3.4 Landscape effects derive from changes in the physical and how this pattern is perceived .It reflects particular reference to the scale of change of view, the degree of landscape, which may give rise to changes in its character combinations of geology, landform soils, vegetation, land use contrast or integration of any new features, the duration and and how this is experienced .This may in turn affect the and human settlement and creates the particular sense of nature of the effect, the angle of view, the distance of the perceived value ascribed to the landscape. place of different areas of the landscape. viewpoint and the extent of the area over which the changes The description and analysis of effects on a landscape would be visible.

4 Medium Some loss or alteration to part of an existing High Areas that exhibit a strong positive character. 3.15 Scale of change in the view would be assessed with landscape feature May be open or exposed with a remote character and an absence of man-made respect to the loss or addition of features and changes in High Total or major loss of an existing landscape features. They are often highly visible from its composition. This includes the proportion of the view feature adjacent landscapes and exhibit a high density of sensitive landscape features. Includes occupied by the proposed development. In the degree of Table - magnitude of change for landscape features (above) the most aesthetically attractive landscapes e.g. contrast or integration consideration might include changes nationally designated areas such as National Parks, in the landscape with the existing or remaining landscape Sensitivity of Landscape Character Levels of sensitivity for landscape character (above) elements and characteristics in terms of form, scale, mass,

line height colour and texture. The duration and nature of the 3.17 The sensitivity of landscape character is an expression of Negligi- No notable introduction of new features into the effect would include consideration of whether temporary or a landscapes capacity to accommodate change. It varies ble landscape or change to the scale, landform, landcover or pattern of landscape permanent, intermittent or continuous . The angle of view is depending on factors such as the scale and form of the Low Introduction of minor new features into the considered in relation to the main activity of the receptor. landscape, landscape pattern, sense of enclosure, sense landscape or some minor change to the scale, of tranquillity and remoteness, the settlement pattern and landform, land cover or pattern of landscape transport network etc. The sensitivity of landscape character Medium Introduction of some notable features into the landscape or some notable change to the scale, is described as high, medium or low and the judgement High Introduction of major features into the landscape Sensitivity of Landscape Features about how sensitive the character areas are has been or some major change to the scale, landform, land cover or pattern of landscape landform, made by extrapolating this information from the relevant land cover or pattern of landscape 3.16 The sensitivity of an individual landscape feature reflects regional and local landscape character studies. Professional Criteria for magnitude of change for landscape character (above) factors such as its quality,value, contribution to landscape judgement has been used to determine the magnitude character and the degree to which the particular element change on landscape character (see below). 3.18 Overall visual impact is determined by combining the can be replaced. A particular feature may be more sensitive sensitivity of the receptor with the magnitude of visual change in one location than in another. It is therefore not possible to Low Areas that exhibit a negative character. Robust landscape. May have a strong sense of enclo- Professional judgement is used to determine the overall simply place different landscape features into sure that reduces visual sensitivity, are likely to significance of impact based on these two elements .Overall sensitivity bands. Professional judgement has been used be already affected by man-made features, have reduced tranquillity, are likely to have little significance is classified as Very Substantial,Substantial, to determine the magnitude of direct physical impacts on inter-visibility with adjacent landscapes and ex- Moderate, Slight or Negligible and the effects can be Adverse individual existing landscape features (see Table below). hibit a low density of sensitive landscape fea- tures. Includes detractors such as power-lines, or Beneficial. industrial derelict or inappropriate built forms Low Landscape features in below average or poor with no aesthetic value or evidence of strategic condition e.g. C or R grade trees (BS 5837) planning. There is a lack of mature vegetation Medium Landscape features in good condition but with cover and no Environmental designations no statutory protection e.g. A and B grade trees apply. (BS 5837) Medium Areas that exhibit a positive character. May have High Landscape features with statutory protection some sense of enclosure, or be affected by e.g. Tree Preservation Order some man-made features, or have little inter- visibility with adjacent landscapes and exhibit Levels of sensitivity for landscape features (above) a moderate density of sensitive landscape features. There is a reasonable distribution of semi-natural vegetation, trees and shrub cover Negligi- No loss or very minor alteration to part of an ex- and the overall view of the area is pleasant. ble isting landscape feature Local Environmental designations of cultural Low Minor loss or alteration to part of an existing and historic value may be present. landscape feature

5

The site is situated on the southern slope of a gentle valley, which lies in the wider context of the Mendip Hills. 4 Baseline site description LDO Location Site Location The proposed LDO (Local Development Order) area is 4.1 The site is located within the Royal Bath and West situated in zone 3 of the site on the north eastern boundary Showground,which is located within the predominantly rural just south of the Prestleigh, shaded red on the figure 1 Page District of Mendip in Somerset. It is around 3km to the south 4. The area is in line with the previous planning framework of the nearest market town of Shepton Mallet and 1.5 km document approved in 2011 , which is to provide support for west of the large village of . The town of Wells the Rural Economy by way of creating a business zone. lies approximately 9.5 kilometres to the north-west,and the

town of lies approximately 12 kilometres to the Landscape Context west. The site is mainly surrounded by open agricultural land, although it borders the small village of Prestleigh to the 4.5 The wider area consists of an undulating landscape with north east.The small sized towns include , which steep slopes leading to frequent hilltops, the vales are lies approximately 7 kilometres to the south of the site and generally wide in scale. To the west the land gently falls Wincanton, which lies approximately 13.5 kilometres to the away to the flatter landscape of the Somerset Levels and south-east. Moors. The ‘Mendip Hills’ AONB is located to the north- west, and Cranbourne Chase and the ‘West Wiltshire 4.2 Primary access is via the A371 which runs to the east of the Downs’AONB is located to the south-east. site and connects it to Castle Cary train station approximately

6 km to the south. There is a secondary site access from the 4.7 There are many villages scattered throughout the A37 to the west. surrounding area, the larger villages most relevant to the proposed site are Evercreech, which lies approximately 1.6 4.3 The site is accessible from Bristol or Bath, which are both kilometres to the south-east of the site; , which lies around 35 km north of the Showground. Junction 23 of the approximately 3.5 kilometres to the south; and Pilton, which M5 lies approximately 35km to the west. lies approximately 3.5 kilometres to the west. The smaller villages most relevant to the site are Prestleigh, which lies Site Description approximately 600 metres to the north-east and East Compton which lies approximately 1.8 kilometres to the 4.4 The LDO site area of 8.22 hectares (see figure 1) is part of north-west. a core Showground area with related buildings,structures and open space. Land outside of the core Showground, to 4.8 Farm complexes and small holdings are widely dispersed the north west and south, is used for parking and camping throughout the area, frequently set back from the highway, during large events, as well as some permanent uses, down long access tracks the closest being Bagborough including a Land Rover off-road course to the north,and farm to the west and Maes Down to the east boundary. a works compound with workshops and hardstanding for outdoor storage to the west.

6 .. ~... --· · R . dmore Ffb, .

j : 75 ,• •4

•• •• • • ,I', ✓.• ·soUthl/4ood ~ .....4 .. 1- Co,nmon _ •. -- · / C ' ~ / M i\ ~ -.; r -I,.....-(_ ... ,,,/ ..... 7'-6,. ---- d lands f'm f!, ~ Lamy . -.....,.,- .~' • Lo

I ., ..... ,.

Topography Map

7 Planning Framework - LDO Area - boundary in red

ZONE 2: OTENTIAL fl PPORTUNJTY Contours within the LDO area

;/ I/ I , The site sits within zone 3 of the showground .The contours continue to 123m to the north of the showground site, and fall to 78m to the south, at the lowest point of the showground 8 4.9 The area surrounding the site is a large scale managed Transport existing road network agricultural landscape, primarily under arable production, with an element of pasture. The field pattern is generally 4.11 There is a strong network of roads in the surrounding area. regular, comprising of medium sized rectilinear fields The larger towns and villages are linked by A roads, with B bounded by hedgerows and fences. A minority of fields are roads, and small roads and lanes linking smaller locations. smaller and more irregular in shape, often associated with The closest A roads to the site are the A371 which runs variations in landform. north south approximately 550 metres to the east of the site and the A37 which runs north-south approximately 750 Topography metres to the west, sections of which follow the Roman

road of the Fosse Way. The A361 runs through Shepton 4.17 The site lies in low lying ground, sitting in a natural Mallet to Glastonbury, and the A371 links Wells with depression, the main 100 m contour runs through the Shepton Mallet. The roads generally have high hedgerows, centre of the site. It is bounded by Beard Hill (150m AOD) this provides good screening to the showground, and to the North and Mae Down hill (206m AOD) to the east. restricted views from many areas. Bagborough Farm (80mAOD) is lower on the western edge but again the site is well screened by high hedgerows and 4.12 The East Somerset Railway, a preserved steam railway, the Plantation. runs east from the outskirts of Shepton Mallet joining the mainline route linking to . Public rights of way 4.10. The topography of the LDO site is a gentle slope rising

some 14 m. It ranges from 93m(AOD) to 107m.(AOD) 4.13 A high voltage overhead line, supported on metal pylons It sits within the context of the showground, which has crosses just north ,from the west (between Glastonbury its low part at the southern end. The northern part of the and Wells), approximately 600 metres in distance, from the showground site slopes up towards the northern boundary, site and continuing east towards Frome. A network of low rising approximately 50m over a distance of 1600m from voltage overhead lines, generally supported on wooden the lower showground boundary. The land form to the north poles, cross the surrounding area. of the site is undulating, rising to around 170-200 metres

(AOD). To the south of the showground site the land form Existing Buildings showground falls gently away to the foot of a valley at around 70 metres

(AOD, along which the watercourse known as Whitelakes 4.14 The Showground and the site has been the subject of runs. The LDO site has been carefully chosen as it sits sporadic development since the 1960s. The existing site well,within the framework of the existing showground. plan shows the existing buildings and features of the showground site and broadly indicates the function of The topography lends itself to the development of a series the areas. The majority of the permanent buildings are of swales which will help the local character, this increase concentrated within the central ‘core’ area, where there are in the waterways and swales within the site will make use a number of large multi-use buildings, as well as a theatre, of the natural contours and linkage to sustainable drainage, a grandstand, the show-ring, and the Society’s offices. and greatly enhance bio-diversity within the site. These buildings were mainly developed between the 1960s and 1980s and are of varying quality. Close to the main

9 entrance there is a children’s nursery in a single storey prefabricated building and a number of small wooden cabins

LDO Siting

4.15 The proposed LDO area will be situated within the north- eastern section of the Royal Bath and West Showground, within an area consisting of a number of grassed spaces designed for outdoor exhibitions/stands; these areas are delineated by a network of hard surfaced routes.

4.16 The site area is well screened, except for one section where the entrance to the road has been left clear for visibility purposes, it is the intention to enhance this landscaping with additional hedgerows and screening.

Landscape Public Rights of Way-adjacent the site 4.18 Within the boundaries of the Royal Bath and West Showground there are a number of woodland areas: the most notable being a linear woodland buffer running down the western edge known as ‘The Plantation’. This is the largest area of woodland consisting very largely of Corsican Pine (Pinus Nigra) Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) Grand Fir Abies grandis, Lawson’s Cypress (Chamaecyparis lawsoniana), Beech (Fagus sylvatica), Ash (Fraxinus excelsior) and Douglas Fir (Pseudot menziesii)

The Beech wood is a linear woodland to the northern edge predominantly beech with a few ash, Lawson’s Cypress and Japanese larch. A linear woodland buffer to the eastern edge is more sporadic but adds to the enclosure.

There is a watercourse running through the central and southern part of the showground site feeding a lake in the south west part of the showground.

10 Internal circulation -hardcore and concrete roads Royal Bath & West Showground Site Boundary LDO- within the Planning Framework

1 The Beech Wood 13 Woodland & Wildlife 2 The Quarry 14 Orchard 3 Woods 15 Leylandii 4 The Darling Pond 16 The Berm 5 Poplars 17 Sycamore 6. The Geoffrey Rouse walk 18. Limes 7. Girl Guide Belt 19 Poplars 8 The James Myatt Belt 20 Limes 9 Beadles Arboretum 21 Willows 10 The Plantation 22 Limes 11 The Oak Avenue 23 Orchard 12 The Coppice 24 Limes

Tree map- showground boundary context- landscape Site Boundary LDO- within the Planning Framework

11 Built Form A371. The route of the existing footpaths is marked on the as well as regeneration proposals at the Bath and West Constraints Plan . The first runs from Higher Bagborough Showground. These ventures have attracted businesses The southern edge is more open but the showground itself Farm, runs north across the showground then turns offering higher skilled and higher paid work. The Bath and provides the backdrop for the proposed development with east to link with the A371 at Prestleigh, a branch of this West Showground, adjacent to Shepton Mallet and lying in only tops of roofs visible. The buildings range from single footpath cuts south-east across the northern corner of a central geographical position away from major centres, storey 3m (toilet blocks) to 8-10m for the main showground the showground then back in-between two Prestleigh also provides leisure facilities and visitor accommodation buildings.It is the intention to keep broadly within this properties to the A371. The second runs again from Higher serving the central and western parts of the district. The building scale within the LDO site, so the massing will be Bagborough Farm east across the showground to link with wider network of cycleways and footpaths provide links in keeping with the existing buildings on the site. The LDO the A371 south. There are no public footpaths within or from the site into the town encouraging healthier lifestyles site will follow the principle already set down in the planning effected by the LDO site. and reducing reliance on the car.” framework document which is 4.25 Local Plan Policy Q1 states that 4.22 As part of the visual assessment it is noted that the existing development proposals should relate satisfactorily to site “15.4.1 Having regard to the rural setting and the scale of line of the public right of way will be retained just north of surroundings in terms of, inter alia, landscape. most buildings on the site (outside of the Showground’s the site. The rights of way are subject to the showgrounds core), it is intended that,in terms of massing, the overriding constraints and are generally not picturesque in nature. 4.26 Neither the Showground nor the surrounding land is scale of the development will be relatively low key with only subject to any nationally or regionally significant landscape a few selected buildings potentially exceeding two storeys Constraints designations. Locally, the Landscape Assessment of the in height.” Mendip Hills (1997) identifies the site as within the Lias 4.22 The Constraints Plan (see page 22) also identifies a variety Lowlands and Ridges Landscape Character Area, within 4.19 The Vehicular access will be via the main access points of infrastructure services (pipes and cables) which cross which the site is in the Whitelake Lowlands area. This part along the A371 to the east focused on the northern access. the showground site and have associated way-leaves. In of the district is described as follows: It is proposed to enhance the landscape in these areas addition, there are two wayleaves across the south west of ‘Much of the area is quite flat and open, with low hedges, with more formal landscaping (see Design Statment). the showground from Bagborough Lane, which are also few hedgerow trees and large irregular fields. On the identified on the Constraints Plan. lowest ground these open areas are pasture, but in the Internal Circulation east, particularly east of the A37 Fosse Way, there is 4.23 A single existing wind turbine is located within the Royal extensive arable. Here the Bath and West Showground, 4.20 Circulation within the existing site is by a grid system of Bath and West Showground. This operational wind turbine and the villages of Evercreech and Stoney roadways. Outside of the central area, the land between is 18 metres height to tip. From Maes down farm this is Stratton are quite prominent’ (para12.2.6). the access roads is mostly laid to grass and used for tents partly hidden by the row of popular trees in the centre of Flooding and temporary trade stands and other structures during the site.

events. In the showground site to the north of the main 4.26 The proposed LDO site has a very low risk of flooding ring, permanent buildings are limited to toilet blocks and Planning Context being at the high end of the showground site. scattered trade stand buildings. 4.24 MENDIP DISTRICT LOCAL PLAN 2006-2028 PART I: Public Rights of Way 4.27 The whole showground site lies wholly within Zone 1 of STRATEGY AND POLICIES states in its Vision the EA Flood Map (version 2.8.2), where there is a risk of

4.21 There are two public foot paths crossing the showground 1 in 1,000 year (0.1% AEP) or less for river flooding. The “Employment and trade has been stimulated by the site from east to west, which can be accessed from the general flood risk in this area is considered to be of a low release of new employment land on the fringes of the town

12 probability. There are no records of past flooding within the area of

Chara ct er Area 140 the Showground, but there are some reports of localised flooding to Ycol'il S ca rplands -~ the south of the Showground in extreme weather, which may be the . · ,_ _l w.. 'F

Dlil:Txt boundary Qi -- - - , and surface water run-off. mpu, / \ ' INCANTON No,

So~ No,

~:-tCJ"O ------7 600-SOO' info. 400-000' !l,\1--AA'./' 0-ZUO'

illllpisham !Olan

;

,. I' . . . ., -·. ". . - , t '- .... • .. ----- 1... 't:-':!:rtl ~-r ,_r :__ ,~ N '--J.J_;. ...._ L ..,! ' . - ._ SllXly orea llOUn::la,y ' : .,._,f ' .. . I THE SITE

$;;;,,_~ ~rr,..... (d I

J;-.

'(

' ;"'::_~·-· 5. Local Landscape Character ' Whitelake Lowlands

• ,-11\.!:: El Whl ta lnko Vnlloy E11 Cannard's Gro vo Shull E1 2 Pllton.Y.tootor,Slopcs- 5.1 Research from Mendip District Council Local Plan shows that, - .,, -'-- E1.3 \','hhL'lktl lc""'l.'lrds ~--- .. E2 Bwo Valtoy, · - :- - .. Figure 11 neither the Showground nor the surrounding land is subject to any E2.1 Brut'! l nwl.:i~ E2.2 B.l~aJSbotOl..!)11 fnrmtarvts end Orthaids · · 11 The Lias Lowla nd s E3 Poldo n Rldgo . and Ridges nationally or regionally significant landscape designations. E4 l:s lo or Avalon -- · Landscape Character Areas \ EG Pcnn1Hd Rldgo 7 - - .. ~ • · .• 11V:,,(,;::-: ,.~ft".S :.4 j ~ '-'• :f':

13 Mendip Hills 141

Mid Somerset Hills 143

. -• - teanbow ar~ It Fm Dairy Unit ,r: Yeovil Scarplands m ~ ~~t~t'.!:, ~S: ,,,, '>}r, 140

~~wits.. \ __ Rifdmorei-ro 1 : ' f : 75 . •, , •. /. .-'so'o:.thwood · •.✓,' _ /- . Cort,n'lon • ,,---- / C , ,,;-:;- / M•~ __ ,.-A,-:-;;:- " T ____ ,,,;r _ ' Redlands ofm ;--.;§.~/ . ~.. • .. O' ,¥' ur's: Br CJ'- ,::-1-, ~.-:::: Udatabase ri

Character map - indicating the bordering National Character Areas

14 5. Local Landscape Character Whitelake Lowlands

5.1 Research from Mendip District Council Local Plan shows that, neither the Showground nor the surrounding land is subject to any nationally or regionally significant landscape designations. 5.2 Locally, the Landscape Assessment of the Mendip Hills (1997) identifies the site as within the ‘Lias Lowlands and Ridges’ Principal Character Area, within which the site is in the Whitelake Lowlands area. This part of the district is described as follows:

5.3 ‘Much of the area is quite flat and open, with low hedges, few hedgerow trees and large irregular fields. On the lowest ground these open areas are pasture, but in the east, particularly east of the A37 Fosse Way, there is extensive arable. Here the Bath and West Showground, and the villages of Evercreech and Stoney Stratton are quite prominent’ (para12.2.6).

5.4 The Mendip Landscape Assessment does not set out any requirements for new development within the context of these landscape areas. In accordance with Local Plan Policy Q1,improvement proposals for the site would need to be sensitive to the character of the Whitelake Lowlands area, but would be considered within the context of the existing development at the Showground.

5.5 The Whitelake Lowlands is an area of undulating ground forming the lower part of the Whitelake valley, bounded by the Pilton- Wooton slopes to the north and by the Pennard Ridge and higher ground around Southwood to the south .To the west it abuts the moors landscape and a band of moors landscape extends into the area around Pennard Midlle Rhyme

Various view - prestleigh village indicating natural colour pallet and local lias limestone

15 5.6 Prestleigh is the closest village to the site having a direct boundary to the north . As you drive along the A371 you pass a few residential dwellings and a converted chapel. Buildings are a mixture of the local vernacular, adhoc extensions and farm buildings. The street has various buildings dating from the 1850’s. Pear tree cottage is on the edge of the boundary nearest the site entrance. Presteigh Inn overlooks the site to the north.

Showground Landscape context - Yeovil Scarplands

5.7 The site lies within north of the National Character Area of the ‘Yeovil Scarplands’ (NCA 140) close to the boundary with ‘Mid -Somerset Hills (NCA143) & Somerset Levels NCA 142 to the west. ‘Mendip Hills’ lies approximately 2 kilometers to the north. This varied landscape is a result of the complicated geologies within this area.

5.8 The immediate context of the site itself contains few landscape features of interest, being open fields with grassland and concrete showground service areas.

5.9 There are hedgerows on the site that are worthy of retention and enhancement (refer to Landscape Strategy).

Character area; Pressures for change.

5.10 The landscape character has been subject to pressure from the general loss of woodland and hedgerows and the loss of the tradition of pollarding ash trees which no longer continues. Various views - indicating building types within the showground generally of run down appearance There is continuing lack of woodland management and some conversion of deciduous woodland to conifers.

There is continued development pressure on large villages and towns resulting in the further loss of open land.

16 1 2 4 5 6 9 10 7 8

11 3

.. , . , ·•-~ 9

~, .. ",' -·· , .... .· ' / t/dat~base rig ied service.

Contour map key to views

17 6 Baseline Visual Analysis fields predominantly used for parking. The main views Key Views within the site are along the existing internal road network Viewpoint 1 Beards Hill Farm and particularly north to south along Avenues A and D Viewpoint Information 6.1 The southern half of the site is largely flat. The northern half 6.6 Turning to views of the showground from the wider area, Date and time of photograph 21-03-2014 @11:36 slopes upwards from 93m AOD to a highpoint of the1997 Landscape Assessment identifies the showground OS reference 363015,140784 approximately 107m AOD in the north, but the showground as being quite prominent. The exhibition halls and the Viewpoint height 145m site rises up further to 125m . Along the north eastern surrounding hardstanding within the core area of the Direction of view 157.5° boundary, where the site adjoins Prestleigh, there are a showground to have the greatest landscape impact. That angle of view 90° number of houses and a public house with gardens that said, the showground is not highly visible from the majority Camera Nikon D5000 18-55 adjoin the showground. of viewpoints in the largely flat sounding area. The northern half of the showground is visible from the top of Prestleigh 6.8 This has been taken from private land viewing south, 6.2 Views from some of these properties extend to the west Hill, although public viewpoints in this area, other than from approximately 500m from the site . In the foreground are and south west across the north half of the showground the directly adjacent properties, are limited. electricity pylons and the site is hidden behind the Beech site, where existing built development is limited. This wood. boundary is identified as ‘sensitive’ on the Constraints 6.7 The showground is visible as a distant landscape feature Plan see page 22 (issued as part of the Development from two hills – Pennard Ridge approximately 2.5km to the 6.9 The deciduous trees are not yet in full leaf and the framework Document in Section 15). south west of the site and Beacon approximately screening effect will be substantial when the trees are in full 4km to the south east. leaf. 6.3 On the southern edge, the showground borders Lower Bagborough Cottages, representing another potentially The buildings on the showground site are generally of a run 6.10 The buildings will not be visible primarily due to this fact sensitive boundary. However, this part of the site is flat and down appearance, due to their age. and the nature of the topography falling away. views are more limited with mature hedgerows installed along this boundary to limit the visual impact of the They are a mixture of agricultural building types and consist 6.11 The small wind turbine is barely visible and the key adjacent car parking area for residents. of a variety of materials and colours . showground buildings are barely visible to the west of Beech Wood. Bagborough farm can be seen in the 6.4 The A371 runs along the eastern boundary of the site and distance. presents the showground’s most commonly viewed aspect. Although views into the site along this frontage are broken by trees and fencing, it is possible to see glimpsed views into the centre of the site. There are no views beyond the showground across the site, other than distant views of Pennard Ridge which lies to the south.

6.5 From within the site, views out of, or across the showground are limited by the existing buildings, trees and hedgerows. Even from the northern tip of the site, which is the highest point, there are not clear views of the southern

18 Viewpoint 2 Mae Down View 3 Lower Easton Farm 6.23 This is indicative of the area and compounded with the Viewpoint Information Viewpoint Information relatively low setting of the site means that views are only Date and time of photograph 21-03-2014 @12:13 Date and time of photograph 21-03-2014 @12:47 obtainable from breaks in the hedgeline. OS reference 364581,140705 OS reference 362508,138291 Viewpoint height 206m Viewpoint height 75m View 4 - Prestleigh A371 looking south. Direction of view 261° Direction of view 11° angle of view 90° angle of view 90° Viewpoint Information Camera Nikon D5000 18-55 Camera Nikon D5000 18-55 Date and time of photograph 21-03-2014 @11:46 OS reference 363476, 140292 6.12 The view from Mae down is approximately 1.5km from the 6.16 The view from Lower Easton farm is approximately 2 km Viewpoint height 106m centre of the site .The view is from private land . from the site and shows that the proposed site will be behind Direction of view 179° the existing buildings of the showground . angle of view 90° 6.13 The tree lined avenue is visible as are the main showground Camera Nikon D5000 18-55 buildings. These buildings set the context for the site. The 6.17 The main buildings are tucked behind existing hedgerows proposed view shows how the buildings will blend into the and Maes down Hill can be seen clearly on the skyline. 6.24 The view just past the cottages on the A371 is some 30m landscape pattern, with the backdrop being the existing from the site where the site is at its most prominent to car showground buildings. This proximity to the other buildings 6.18 The row of pylons breaks the skyline in this view but drivers. The vehicles will get glimpses of the buildings fronting is important as it defines the additions as being part of the the proposed buildings will be within the context of the the main road. At present there is some screening to the showground development. showground. site and some post and rail fencing. The existing flag poles denote the start of the showground site.The telegraph pole in 6.14 It is clear from the montage that with the correct colour 6.19 Farm buildings can be clearly seen in the foreground, these the foreground denotes the entrance.and carries two traffic approach these buildings will nestle into the landscape, and help set the character of the area, being industrial in nature . highway signs. with further screening provided will enhance the hedgerow pattern. 6.20 The low visual impact from this view is demonstrated as the 6.25 The photo montage clearly shows the existing hedge line proposed buildings will sit behind the Exmoor halls, Edmund aids the screening of the buildings from this view . 6.15 The western planting including the plantation can be seen as Rack and the showground restaurant. a backdrop screening Bagborough farm in the distance. 6.26 The view has been indicated in its winter and summer form 6.21 Prestleigh Inn is just visible behind the hedge line due to the to indicated the seasonal screening. fact that the trees are deciduous, it also marks the highest point of the showground site, and the development is some 16m below the top of the site and 30m above the bottom of the proposed site.

6.22 The view angle from the farm is fairly narrow due to the high hedgerows in this area. For the majority of the road from Evercreech to Pylle the view is obscured with high hedgerows.

19 Viewpoint 5 Prestleigh Inn Carpark View 7- Bagborough Lane Viewpoint Information 6.20 This view is looking towards the LDO and has a high Date and time of photograph 14-05-2014 @12:25 Viewpoint Information hedgrow protecting the view into the site. The foreground has OS reference 363312,140526 Date and time of photograph14-05-2014 @12:54 a poor mix of signage, telephone and electricity poles will Viewpoint height 123m OS reference 363280, 139100 add to the visual clutter of this view. Direction of view 157.° Viewpoint height 75m angle of view 90° Direction of view 7° The hedgerow will be further enhanced with additional Camera Nikon D5000 18 angle of view 90° indiginous planting, which will help filter some of the clutter Camera Nikon D5000 18 visually. 6.12 The view from the car park has the showground and the LDO site in full view. 6.18 This view is looking directly at farmland . Both the View 10- View from Bagborough Lane Showground Entrance Showground and the LDO site are hidden from view, 6.13 The majority of the large scale showground buildings are in screened by the Plantation and the Berm. The showgrounds Viewpoint Information view form this angle, although they sit in the natural dip. avenue of tall limes are barely visible in the background . Date and time of photograph 14-05-2014 @13:12 OS reference 362903 ,139631 6.14 It is clear from the montage that with the correct colour View 8- A371- Bagborough Lane Junction Viewpoint height 83m approach these buildings will nestle into the landscape, and Direction of view 46 with further screening provided will enhance the hedgerow Viewpoint Information angle of view 90° pattern.This enhancement is essential to blend the LDO site Date and time of photograph 14-05-2014 @13:15 Camera Nikon D5000 20 within its context. OS reference 363614, 138853 Viewpoint height 74m 6.21 This is a cluttered view that is unaffected by the development View 6 View from A371- B3081 Junction Direction of view 1° proposal .It is a mixture of industrial and agricultural buildings angle of view 90° and shipping containers in the foreground. Viewpoint Information Camera Nikon D5000 18 Date and time of photograph 14-05-2014 @12:35 The LD0 site is well hidden from view by the existing planting. OS reference 363519,140048 6.19 This view is looking directly up the A371 which rises slowly in Viewpoint height 99m the distance. The LDO is not visible due to the nature of the Direction of view 337° hedgerows, the topography and the existing planting around angle of view 90° the perimeter of the showground. Camera Nikon D5000 24 View 9- View from B3081 Prestleigh road towards the LDO Site 6.15 The view is taken looking towards Prestleigh along the A371 Viewpoint Information 6.17 The main buildings are tucked behind existing hedgerows, Date and time of photograph 14-05-2014 @12:35 with the hedgerows being dominant in this view.The OS reference 363553 ,140032 proposed buildings are visible through a landscape frontage Viewpoint height 99m that will enhance the setting .Additional planting will be added Direction of view 303° to break the linear height of the hedgrows and add further angle of view 90° visual interest. Camera Nikon D5000 20

20 Viewpoint 11 Pylle A37

Viewpoint Information Date and time of photograph 14-05-2014 @13:18 OS reference 361579,138021 Viewpoint height 101m Direction of view 24.° angle of view 90° Camera Nikon D5000 22

6.21 The view from Pylle Hill has the showground in the far distant. The houses to Pylle lane are prominent in the foreground.

The LDO site will just be visible at its high end, with the landscaping blending in to the existing patchwork, of hedgelines and planting belts.It will be negligible in its impact on this setting.

21 .· MERGENCY ENTRANCE

~

CONSTRAINTS PLAN

22 WJ1IM(Y ~NT PAR!gllg / CMIPptG' AR~

MalnShowc.arP.nb~ 1. Pul:JI'• 2. Qun J . lll!ld 4 . 'l'allDII ,S . ~lu,e

(iEIIERAl OJEll1MEAS FOR: Sl:IOWGRDllJIID USE I iTEMPOllMl.¥ EY.Etlif s;fRIJCI\Jlt'ES

~ PERMNNENTU:SES:

t::..::::J A• Squastrlan .....,_ - s - xtnme -tK4 Coun• and Gama·ror the IN'sltllldl f;: • !eight llmtuSIT'.111

IIAflD§;TAJIDINGI AREA FOil STO.ltAG E I IM.RllNGl I rElilfOIRl)T EY.ENiir S11UJC'IUltES

EXISTING SITE PLAN I 23 Existing landscape features The site itself has very little vegetation of note with hedgerows dividing the various showground sections. The buildings consist of toilet block, gatehouses and low quality agricultural buildings. There are two entrances to this part of the site and one will be retained as access through the site for showground purposes. The two significant trees worthy of retention are on the higher part of the showground site and will remain untouched. Although there are no specific areas of high landscape quality, existing vegetation will be retained within the LDO area where possible. Boundary hedgerows are to be retained and enhanced in line with the development framework document and Landscape Strategy.

Aerial LDO area

Figure 1

View from gate towards North Entrance 24 View from centre of the site towards Prestleigh Inn

View south to southern gate Entrance Gate

25 LDO AREA (20.32acres) 8.22 Hectares

Public right of way

5 6 VISITOR PHOTO VOLTAIC DESTINATION AND ENERGY PARK ZONE RURAL ECONOMY ZONE Myrtle Cottage Broadclose BUSINESS ZONE

Georgian House Yew Tree 3 Building positions show for indicative purposes only

Prestleigh Inn (PH)

Ivy thorn Cottage 4 1 BATH & WEST SHOWGROUND RURAL & COUNTRY LEISURE ZONE

2 POTENTIAL FUTURE OPPORTUNITY ZONE

0 10 50 100 125 Meters at scale 1:2500

Layout of buildings within the LDO is provided for illustrative purposes only 26 Beech Wood Small wind turbine Showground restaurant Pylon north of the site Exmoor halls Edmund rack Main ring

11

Views position

View 1 Existing view from Beard Hill Position of proposed buildings indicated by the defined line for clarity as visibility is miniimal

View 1 Illustrative view from Beard Hill

27 Showground restaurant Exmoor halls Edmund rack Glastonbury Tor A371 Boating Main ring Showground restaurant Existing vegetation to the Lake / train northern boundary track

2

Views position

View 2 Existing view from Maes Down looking west across the site

Roof colours to create a New rural economy Tree lined avenue existing Hotel position patchwork business zone

View 2 Illustrative sketch view from Maes Down looking west across the site 28 3 Views position

Position of proposed buildings indicated by the defined line for clarity as visibility is miniimal View 3 Existing view from Lower Easton farm

View 3 Illustrative view from Lower Easton farm

29 4

View 4 Existing view from Prestleigh

View 4 Illustrative view from Prestleigh

30 Showground restaurant Exmoor halls Edmund rack Line of existing Main ring hedgerow

Tree avenue Entrance Gate 5

View 5 Existing View from Prestleigh Inn

View 5 Illustrative View from Prestleigh Inn

31 6

View 6 Existing view from A371 -B3081 Junction

Illustrative 6 Existing view from A371 -B3081 Junction

32 7

View 7 Existing view from Bagborough Lane

View 7 Illustrative view from Bagborough Lane

33 8

View 8 Existing view from A371 - Bagborough Lane Junction

View 8 Illustrative view from A371 - Bagborough Lane Junction

34 9

View 9 Existing view from B3081 Prestleigh road towards site

View 9 Illustrative view from B3081 Prestleigh road towards site

35 10

View 10 Bagborough Lane showground entrance existing

View 10 Bagborough Lane showground entrance Illustrative

36 11

View 11 Existing view A37 adjacent Pylle lane

View 11 Illustrative view A37 adjacent Pylle lane

37 • Replacement of existing less attractive buildings; 7 Development Proposals. 7.7 Buildings will be designed to minimise site cut and to make • New and improved buildings of appropriate scale and the most of orientation and massing. high quality design, with a suitable ‘rural’ appearance, 7.1 The Showground is in a rural location, which is central to incorporating local vernacular features; its purpose and function. As such, a key consideration has 7.8 The larger buildings will be located to the western been to ensure that its visual impact on the landscape is boundary with the backdrop of the existing showground 7.14 There is a need for a coherent approach moving forward, minimised. buildings. bringing landscape, showground space and hard standing into the context of the masterplan moving forward. 7.2 The existing site is a relatively sparse area of the show- 7.9 Colours and materials will be chosen to both enhance and ground with some existing hedgerows.There are some create a cohesive development. 7.15 There are opportunities to enhance the showground using internal circulation routes and low key building structures landscape both in visual terms and from a sustainability including a gatehouse and toilet block it is the intention to 7.10 The intermittent vegetation to the A371 frontage will be point of view. remove these. enhanced to create a key frontage to the development. The introduction of the proposed contiguous planting 7.16 The entrances to the site are functional and would benefit 7.3 The proposed site has been laid out to create a central scheme of native species will have the additional benefit of from various upgrades over a phased period. spine road and landscaping corridor creating a central providing an enhanced habitat for wildlife. focus. The entrance road provides linkage to the existing 7.17 Certain elements of the site are open by the nature of showground routes. 7.11 The key species will be retained around the brick cottage the exhibition space needed for the showground site. namely the beech and scotts pine whilst lesser and dying This brings special challenges when dealing with the 7.4 Access to the site is off the existing northern entrance, the species will be removed. masterplanning of both the LDO site and the showground. landscape to this will be enhanced. The existing screening vegetation belt is to be retained and thickened with under 7.12 Although not on the site itself,the public right of way to the 7.18 A Landscaping Strategy for the LDO site has been story shrubs and occasional forest sized trees, augmented north of the site is seen as integral to the proposal for the prepared within the Design Statement. with earth mounding. The road frontage is provided with landscaping to the north. Within the long term landscape a new dense hedge belt. It is particularly important to strategy it will be upgraded seeking to encourage further u provide screening at this location, which is very close to the sage for dog walking and hikers. 8 Landscape effects residential properties on the southern side of Prestleigh. 7.13 As part of the development frame work there has 8.1 This section details the landscape effects arising from the 7.5 The landscape to the cottages will be reinforced with been a comittment to the showground improvement development of the site. These effects are considered with structural landscaping and sympathetic mounding as part and it provides the opportunity to manage and reduce reference to the landscape designations, ( the appraisal of the overall framework for the showground. both the LDO’s site’s visual impact and aid long term of landscape and individual landscape components and the appearance of the showground through measures features.) the sensitivity and the magnitude of change. 7.6 Swales and balancing features will create a rural setting including: in keeping with the local character, and enhancing bio 8.2 The proposed site lies within the Yeovil Scarplands diversity. A series of basins ,connected by above ground • Maintenance of substantial open Showground areas, character area and the Whitelake lowlands consisting drainage swales and linear wetlands will attenuate surface which will continue to be used for open showground of gently undulating farmland with open areas and low water ,cleaning it naturally and providing water bodies function and temporary structures; hedges.Villages and showground are locally prominent. attractive to people and wildlife.

38 9 Visual Effects 8.3 Direct landscape impact occurs to the area affected by Visual sensitivity: medium development. Whilst in the short term the new development Visual magnitude of change: Low adverse 9.1 A comprehensive visual assessment has been undertaken to is visible, this would always be in the context of the existing Overall significance: Slight Adverse determine the visual effects upon the surrounding receptors showground, and the overall character of the area is not of the development. Using the methodology outlined in adversely affected. After 5 years the tree planting will reduce the visual impact. Section 2 receptor views to the development have been assessed in terms of sensitivity, pro posed changes to view 8.4 In the longer term as the new hedgerow structure and Visual sensitivity: medium and the resulting overall significance. trees establish this could have a beneficial effect on the Visual magnitude of change: low surrounding landscape character, providing a stronger Overall significance: Slightly Beneficial. 9.2 Receptor 1 .Beard hill and footpath network degree of visual enclosure, strengthening the lowland The sites view from the farm to the south is restricted by the character and providing a better transition between both the existing woodland planting. The pylons are the prominent showground LDO site and the rural areas. 9.4 Receptor 3- Low Easton farm feature to the skyline. The footpath passes north of the site and any walks will only h ave a visual sensitivity when you 8.5 The landscape sensitivity (or capacity) is assessed as From the low level area looking up at the showground the enter the showground site directly. medium considering the scale of the landscape, and the existing plantation and woodlands mask the site. Prestleigh relatively small impact the site has on both the existing and the cottages define the high ground of the showground The magnitude of visual change is low and the overall impact showground setting, and the wider context, the magnitude of site. Bagborough farm provides the forground context and is negligible. any change would be low. in keeping with the scale of the showground buildings. In the background to the east Maes down and Small down knoll Visual sensitivity: Low 8.6 There are no valued landscape components that are lost to rise to 206m and 222 m well above the medium 150m of the Visual magnitude of change: Low adverse development. Existing hedgerows have been retained where LDO site. Overall significance: negligible development allows, and impact on the individual landscape features would therefore be minimal . Visual sensitivity: Low 9.3 Receptor 2 - Maes Hill Visual magnitude of change: Low adverse The view from Maes hill is approximately 1.5 km looking 8.7 Landscape impact on the surrounding character areas would Overall significance: Negligibly Adverse down on the showground from a height of 206m. not be significant. 9.5 Receptor 4.Prestleigh The A371 is prominent as are the existing showground 8.8 Overall the wider landscape impact arising from the devel- buildings. The tree lined avenue appears in the showground opment has been assessed as slightly adverse in the short The view down the A371 is dominated by the road and low setting. term. In the medium and long term as the hedgerow and hedgerows and dry stone wall that define the perimeter. woodland planting establishes the magnitude of the change The signage and flag poles currently mark the entrance to The contours sweep down from Pylle and Ditcheat to create would be low and there are likely to be beneficial landscape the showground site. The perimeter is marked with a post a valley type view.Glastonbury Tor can just be seen in the effects for example the removal of incongruous features and and rail fence giving it rural setting ,and the grass verge is distance. increased bio-diversity and habitat creation. merged and rural. The road slopes up on the way to Ditcheat giving glimpsed The proposed development will nestle in the existing valley views of the proposed site. with the showground context ( a mixture of agricultural monopitched and gabled buildings ) and Bagborough farm is

visible behind.

39 This view is only some 30m away from the site and needs Receptor 6 view from A371 -B3081 Junction careful consideration as it has a close proximity to Prestleigh. The view down the road will seen from passing traffic. The Receptor 9 View from B3081 Prestleigh road towards site A defining break is needed to avoid merging of the entrance view has the context of the showground setting. yet this needs to be subtle in the landscape context. This view is head on towards the LDO site .The existing The road corridor would suit a strengthened vegetation The strengthened landscaping to the eastern belt, helps hedgerow will soften the development and this is to be proposal of quality, which could be further enhanced by the screen the site. This will be enhanced and thickened . reinforced. correct rural fencing and signage approach. This road corridor suits the strengthened vegetation proposal Buildings are seen at an oblique angle so their visual impact this will need to be a quality addition, which could be further Visual sensitivity: medium is reduced. enhanced by the correct rural fencing and signage approach Visual magnitude of change: Low adverse as the development progress’s. Overall significance: Slight Adverse Visual sensitivity: Low/medium Visual sensitivity: medium Visual magnitude of change: Low adverse Visual magnitude of change: Low adverse After 5 years the tree planting will reduce the visual impact. Overall significance: Negligibly Adverse Overall significance: Slight Adverse

Visual sensitivity: medium After 5 years the tree planting will reduce the visual impact. Visual magnitude of change: low Beneficial Overall significance: Neglibly Beneficial. Visual sensitivity: medium Receptor 7 view Bagborough Lane Visual magnitude of change: low Beneficial Overall significance: Neglibly Beneficial. Receptor 5- Prestleigh Inn The view down from the lane remains unchanged .

The view from the car park takes in the showground and the Receptor 10 Bagborough Lane showground entrance LDO view. Visual sensitivity: Low. existing This is a complicated viewpoint as at many times of the year Visual magnitude of change: Low it is impacted by the show events. Overall significance: Negligible The view down from the lane remains unchanged . The LDO site varies from 107m to 93m and as such its visual impact is reduced . The existing hedge lines shield the site from view and allows it to filter into the landscape. Visual sensitivity: Low. Receptor 8 Bagborough Lane Junction Visual magnitude of change: Low Overall significance: Negligible Visual sensitivity: Low/medium The view down from the lane remains unchanged . Receptor 11 Proposed view A37 adjacent Pylle lane Visual magnitude of change: Low adverse Overall significance: Negligibly Adverse This view is a very distant one and as such the addition of the Visual sensitivity: Low. LD0 site will create very little change. This view is also seen Visual magnitude of change: Low in the wider context of the showground, which has various Overall significance: Negligible events taking place throughout the year.

40 The eye tends be drawn to the nearer properties on Pylle lane as this is a fairly fast moving road and has no footpaths.

It is for these reasons that the change of view is seen as minimal.

Visual sensitivity: Low. Visual magnitude of change: Low Overall significance: Negligible

41 10 Conclusions 10.7 The sustainable drainage system is being utilised to enhance The area to the north of the site adjacent Prestleigh will both the visual environment and the ecology with new be zoned as B1.This will help reduce noise levels in this 10.1 A Landscape and Visual Assessment of the proposed wetlands features including pollarded ash and meandering area, and allow a more suitable use against this sensitive scheme has been conducted following standard procedure . swales. boundary.

10.2 The site lies within north of the National Character Area of 10.8 The building materials chosen will be natural in colour the ‘Yeovil Scarplands’ (NCA 140) close to the boundary with making reference to the local stone colour, and the roof ‘Mid -Somerset Hills (NCA143) & Somerset Levels (NCA 142) lines will be broken with colour that adds to the patchwork of to the west. ‘Mendip Hills’ lies approximately 2 kilometers to existing roofscape. the north.This varied landscape is a result of the complicated geologies within this area. 10.9 The proposed new development is not incongruous to the

showground development, and indeed will aid its setting by 10.3Locally, the Landscape Assessment of the Mendip Hills creating a cohesive boundary treatment and enhancement of (1997) identifies the site as within the ‘Lias Lowlands and the interior environment. Ridges’ Principal Character Area, within which the site is in the ‘Whitelake Lowlands’ LCA. This part of the district is 10.10 The opportunities for landscape conservation and described as follows: enhancement are seen as key to achieving a coherent approach with the previous guidelines provided by the ‘Much of the area is quite flat and open, with low hedges, planning framework approval. few hedgerow trees and large irregular fields. On the lowest ground these open areas are pasture” 10.11 The overall landscape character would be little affected and the proposals would enhance the setting of the It is this character that the LDO landscape proposals seek to showground. reinforce .

10.12 Because of the topography, views of the development can 10.4 Locally the site is visually prominent, restricted by the be obtained from very few residential and other receptors nature of being in a low-lying position relative to Shepton Many of these views would be screened as both the existing Mallet, Pylle and Prestleigh. There is good screening to the showground and the new LDO planting matures. Most visual boundaries, with large areas of mature screening to the west impact for these receptors would, following the landscape and north and existing hedgerow boundaries to the east and scheme be in the moderate beneficial category. south.It is the intention to add to this screening both externally and within the site boundary to the north. 10.13 The overall visual impact will be linked to the phasing of the landscape works . 10.5 The enhancement of the hedgerow and hedgerow tree The key structure planting will be planted in the first available patterns are seen as being key to the new LDO development. planting season having due regard to the plateauing works.

10.6 The proposed scheme will enhance the wildlife habitats and add to the interest and texture of the landscape.

42