Tribally Approved American Indian Ethnographic Analysis of the Proposed Millers Solar Energy Zone

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Tribally Approved American Indian Ethnographic Analysis of the Proposed Millers Solar Energy Zone Tribally Approved American Indian Ethnographic Analysis of the Proposed Millers Solar Energy Zone Ethnography and Ethnographic Synthesis For Solar Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement and Solar Energy Study Areas in Portions of Arizona, California, Nevada, and Utah Participating Tribes Duckwater Shoshone Tribe, Duckwater, Nevada Timbisha Shoshone Tribe, Death Valley, California By Richard W. Stoffle Kathleen A. Van Vlack Hannah Z. Johnson Phillip T. Dukes Stephanie C. De Sola Kristen L. Simmons Bureau of Applied Research in Anthropology School of Anthropology University of Arizona October 2011 Solar PEIS Ethnographic Assessment Page 1 MILLERS The proposed Millers solar energy zone (SEZ) is situated in the southern end of the Big Smoky Valley, located in Esmeralda County, Nevada. The Big Smoky Valley is a north-trending basin within the Basin and Range province in south-central Nevada. The valley is roughly 567,700 acres and stretches 115 miles. The SEZ is approximately forty miles east of the California/Nevada border, fifteen miles northwest of Tonopah, Nevada, and sits just north of Interstate 95. The valley shares borders with the Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest, the closest section-sitting due north of the Millers SEZ (see Figure 1). Figure 1 Google Earth Image of Millers SEZ American Indian Study Area and Big Smoky Valley The Millers SEZ American Indian study area extends beyond the boundaries of the SEZ because of the existence of cultural resources in the surrounding landscape. The Millers SEZ American Indian study area includes plant and animal communities, geological features, water Solar PEIS Ethnographic Assessment Page 2 sources, storied lands, historic events and the trails that would have connected these features. Western Shoshone tribal representatives maintain that, in order to understand Numic connections to the SEZ, it must be placed in context with neighboring connected places. Summary of SEZ American Indian Study Area Significance The lands under consideration in the Millers SEZ American Indian study area, related to the Solar Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (PEIS), were traditionally occupied and used, aboriginally owned, and historically related to the Numic-speaking peoples of the Great Basin. People specifically involved in the Solar PEIS field consultations summarized here are from the Timbisha Shoshone Tribe (Figure 3) and Duckwater Shoshone Tribe (Figure 2) and are representing the cultural interests of the Western Shoshone people. Figure 2 Duckwater Tribal Representatives Within the Millers SEZ Figure 3 Timbisha Tribal Representatives at the Base of and on Crescent Dunes in the Millers SEZ American Indian Study Area Solar PEIS Ethnographic Assessment Page 3 Numic-speaking peoples have and continue to stipulate that they are the American Indian people responsible for the cultural resources (natural and manmade) in this study area because their ancestors were placed here by the Creator and subsequently, they have lived in these lands, maintaining and protecting these places, plants, animals, water sources, and cultural signs of their occupation. These Numic-speaking peoples further stipulate that, because they have lived in these lands since the end of the Pleistocene and throughout the Holocene (or approximately 15,000 years), they deeply understand the dramatic shifts in climate and ecology that have occurred over these millennia. Indian lifeways were dramatically influenced by these natural shifts, but certain religious and ceremonial practices persisted unchanged. These traditional ecological understandings are carried from generation to generation through the recounting of origin stories occurring in Mythic Times and by strict cultural and natural resource conservation rules. The involved American Indian tribal governments and their appointed cultural representatives have participated in this PEIS in order to explain the meaning and cultural centrality of the plants, animals, spiritual trails, healing places, and places of historic encounters that exist in these lands. Map 1 Pleistocene Lakes in Nevada and California Solar PEIS Ethnographic Assessment Page 4 The Late Pleistocene ecology of the Great Basin region was rich in fauna and flora. Central to this supportive habitat were wet forested uplands, full grasslands, and long wetlands located along a complex network of streams feeding into medium and large lakes (Grayson 1993). American Indian people hunted, gathered, made trails, and built communities throughout this area. They engaged with this topographically interesting landscape through ceremonial activities. Large mammals, like mastodons, ranged throughout these habitats from the lowest wetlands up to 8,990 feet where the Huntington mammoth remains were found—a subalpine environment in the Late Pleistocene (Grayson 1993:165). While contemporary scholars often focus their studies on charismatic species like the Mastodons, dozens of medium sized mammals have also been found, including camels, horses, ground sloths, skunks, bears, Saber-tooth cats, American lions, flat headed peccaries, muskoxen, mountain goats, pronghorn antelope and American cheetahs (Grayson 1993:159). Smaller mammals were also present. Avian species were abundant and occurred in many sizes that ranged from the largest (the Incredible Teratorn with a wingspan of 17 feet and the Merriam’s Teratorn with a wingspan of 12 feet—both related to the condors and vultures) to the smallest (humming birds) (Grayson 1993:168). Other birds included flamingos, storks, shelducks, condors, vultures, hawks, eagles, caracaras, lapwings, thick-knees, jays, cowbirds, and blackbirds (Grayson 1993:167). The biodiversity of the land and air was matched by the fish species and numbers in the streams and lakes. There were at least twenty species of fish including whitefish, cisco, trout, chum, dace, shiner, sucker, and sculpin (Grayson 1993:187). The fish species traveled widely across the Great Basin through a variety of interconnected lakes and streams. The Late Pleistocene lakes (Map 1) were but a central portion of this hydrological network supporting fish species and by implications, great biodiversity in flora and fauna. Grayson (1993:169) concluded his analysis with an ecological assessment of the Late Pleistocene natural conditions in the Great Basin region: The large number of species of vultures, condors, and teratorn in the Late Pleistocene Great Basin raises a number of interesting ecological questions…the fact that there were so many species of these birds here suggests that the mammal fauna of the time was not only rich in species, but also rich in number of individual animals. Naturally, the American Indian populations also were well supported by this bounty of nature. Lake Tonopah Central in the interpretation of the Millers SEZ American Indian study area is a massive Late Pleistocene lake, wetland, river, and stream hydrological system dominated by what is today called ancient Lake Tonopah. This hydrological system supported both complex biodiversity and biocomplexity for tens of thousands of years—possibly since the Pliocene, as did a similar hydrological system centered in Fish Lake Valley and Columbus Marshes to the west (see Map 2) (Reheis et al. 1993b). Indian people, according to their oral history accounts, have lived in this productive environment since time immemorial. This area, consequently, became and continues to be culturally central in their lives. Solar PEIS Ethnographic Assessment Page 5 Map 2 Big Smoky Valley Drainage Basin with Pleistocene Lakes Solar PEIS Ethnographic Assessment Page 6 The watershed of ancient Lake Tonopah extends down slope from the north to the south along what is known today as Big Smoky Valley. This enclosed hydrological system is about sixty-two miles north to south and twenty-one miles east to west. Prominent mountains and ranges surround the major wetlands, lakes, and river in this watershed (see Map 3). Viewing this watershed counterclockwise, Lone Mountain sits in the southeast, the San Antonio Mountains in the east, Mount Jefferson and Wildcat Peak are highpoints in the Toquima Mountain Range, which defines the eastern edge of Big Smoky Valley. Mahogany Mountain and Arc Dome are the southern and most visible portions of the Toiyabe Range, a portion of the Shoshone Mountains. The northern portion of Mahogany Mountain is the headwater of the major north- flowing Reese River. The southeast side of Mahogany Mountain contains Peavine Canyon, out of which flows the Peavine Creek. Royston Hills and Paradise Range define the watershed in the west as does the Monte Cristo Range in the southwest. Water flows off the slopes of all these mountains and hills but Peavine Creek is a prominent hydrological feature today, as it flows down slope along the entire length of the Big Smoky Valley and into ancient Lake Tonopah. This hydrological system was a cultural and natural center in the lives of many Shoshone people for thousands of years. Map 3 Millers SEZ American Indian Study Area and Associated Water Systems Solar PEIS Ethnographic Assessment Page 7 Special Features Big Smoky Valley (Millers SEZ American Indian study area) is a Storied Land with many important cultural features (Table 1). There are stories here about events that happened before people came to be in charge of the world. It was a time some call Mythic Time, but this term should be used carefully because in Western Culture, the term mythic means not true or fictional. In Numic culture, Mythic Time denotes
Recommended publications
  • HISTORY of the TOIYABE NATIONAL FOREST a Compilation
    HISTORY OF THE TOIYABE NATIONAL FOREST A Compilation Posting the Toiyabe National Forest Boundary, 1924 Table of Contents Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 3 Chronology ..................................................................................................................................... 4 Bridgeport and Carson Ranger District Centennial .................................................................... 126 Forest Histories ........................................................................................................................... 127 Toiyabe National Reserve: March 1, 1907 to Present ............................................................ 127 Toquima National Forest: April 15, 1907 – July 2, 1908 ....................................................... 128 Monitor National Forest: April 15, 1907 – July 2, 1908 ........................................................ 128 Vegas National Forest: December 12, 1907 – July 2, 1908 .................................................... 128 Mount Charleston Forest Reserve: November 5, 1906 – July 2, 1908 ................................... 128 Moapa National Forest: July 2, 1908 – 1915 .......................................................................... 128 Nevada National Forest: February 10, 1909 – August 9, 1957 .............................................. 128 Ruby Mountain Forest Reserve: March 3, 1908 – June 19, 1916 ..........................................
    [Show full text]
  • Schedule of Proposed Action (SOPA)
    Schedule of Proposed Action (SOPA) 10/01/2017 to 12/31/2017 Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest This report contains the best available information at the time of publication. Questions may be directed to the Project Contact. Expected Project Name Project Purpose Planning Status Decision Implementation Project Contact Projects Occurring in more than one Region (excluding Nationwide) Sierra Nevada Forest Plan - Land management planning Completed Actual: 09/17/2013 03/2014 Donald Yasuda Amendment (SNFPA) 09/13/2013 916-640-1168 EIS [email protected] *UPDATED* Description: Prepare a narrowly focused analysis to comply with two orders issued by the Eastern District Court of California on November 4, 2009. Correct the 2004 SNFPA Final SEIS to address range of alternatives and analytical consistency issues. Web Link: http://www.fs.fed.us/r5/snfpa/2010seis Location: UNIT - Eldorado National Forest All Units, Lassen National Forest All Units, Modoc National Forest All Units, Sequoia National Forest All Units, Tahoe National Forest All Units, Lake Tahoe Basin Mgt Unit, Carson Ranger District, Bridgeport Ranger District, Plumas National Forest All Units, Sierra National Forest All Units, Stanislaus National Forest All Units, Inyo National Forest All Units. STATE - California, Nevada. COUNTY - Alpine, Amador, Butte, Calaveras, El Dorado, Fresno, Inyo, Kern, Lassen, Madera, Mariposa, Modoc, Mono, Nevada, Placer, Plumas, Shasta, Sierra, Siskiyou, Tulare, Tuolumne, Yuba, Douglas, Esmeralda, Mineral. LEGAL - Along the Sierra Nevada Range, from the Oregon/California
    [Show full text]
  • Central Nevada
    University of Nevada Reno LATE CENOZOIC GEOLOGY AND TECTONICS OF STEWART AND MONTE CRISTO VALLEYS, WEST - CENTRAL NEVADA A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science .I by Mark Philip Molinari fit ; December, 1984 ii ABSTRACT Discontinuous right-normal-slip faults comprise the N30 0W trending, 45 kilometer long Stewart - Monte Cristo fault zone (SMCFZ). Initiation of the SMCFZ postdates the 15.5 to 11.0 m.y. Esmeralda Formation. Right-normal-slip >1 meter occurred on the southern segment of the SMCFZ during the 1932 Cedar Mountain earthquake (Ms= 7.2-7.3). Geomor- phic evidence supports at least three and possibly five or six surface faulting events on the southern segment during the latest Pleistocene and Holocene. Gentle folds in the Esmeralda Formation east of and sub-parallel to the SMCFZ are coeval with and genetically related to faulting. Structural development of the SMCFZ is similar to other right-lateral wrench faults and is consistent with labora- tory wrench fault models. The SMCFZ is the youngest and southeasternmost fault of a system of major late Cenozoic, left-stepping, en echelon right-slip faults in the central Walker Lane. - .~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ iii TABLE OF CONTENTS page ABSTRACT .................. S S ii INTRODUCTION . 0 0 1 0 * I Location and Extent of Study Area . S S S S 1 Regional Tectonic and Geologic Setting. S. S a * 0 1 Purpose and Scope ...... a a * a 5 Methodology . 6 Previous Work . 8 Physiography. 10 MESOZOIC STRATIGRAPHY. 13 Sedimentary Rocks . & 13 Mina Formation . 13 Luning Formation . 13 Plutonic Rocks .
    [Show full text]
  • Hydrographic Basins Information
    A p p e n d i x A - B a s i n 54 Crescent Valley Page 1 of 6 Basin 54 - Crescent Valley Crescent Valley is a semi-closed basin that is bounded on the west by the Shoshone Range, on the east by the Cortez Mountains, on the south by the Toiyabe Range, and on the north by the Dry Hills. The drainage basin is about 45 miles long, 20 miles wide, and includes an area of approximately 750 square miles. Water enters the basin primarily as precipitation and is discharged primarily through evaporation and transpiration. Relatively small quantities of water enter the basin as surface flow and ground water underflow from the adjacent Carico Lake Valley at Rocky Pass, where Cooks Creek enters the southwestern end of Crescent Valley. Ground water generally flows northeasterly along the axis of the basin. The natural flow of ground water from Crescent Valley discharges into the Humboldt River between Rose Ranch and Beowawe. It is estimated that the average annual net discharge rate is approximately 700 to 750 acre-feet annually. Many of the streams which drain snowmelt of rainfall from the mountains surrounding Crescent Valley do not reach the dry lake beds on the Valley floor: instead, they branch into smaller channels that eventually run dry. Runoff from Crescent Valley does not reach Humboldt River with the exception of Coyote Creek, an intermittent stream that flows north from the Malpais to the Humboldt River and several small ephemeral streams that flow north from the Dry Hills. Surface flow in the Carico Lake Valley coalesces into Cooks Creek, which enters Crescent Valley through Rocky Pass.
    [Show full text]
  • Position Outreach Announcement
    USDA FOREST SERVICE INTERMOUNTAIN REGION, R4 HUMBOLDT-TOIYABE NATIONAL FOREST AUSTIN/TONOPAH RANGER DISTRICTS Rangeland Management Specialist December 17, 2009 About thePosition… The Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest will soon be filling a Rangeland Management Specialist position, GS-0454-5/7/9, located in Austin, Nevada on the Austin/Tonopah Ranger Districts. The Austin/Tonopah Ranger Districts administer grazing on 47 cattle allotments and 2 sheep allotments. The Districts also manage thirteen wild horse and burro territories. This position offers a variety of opportunities for individuals to develop skills and enjoy a variety of challenging experiences. Are you Interested? Interested applicants, or those desiring further information, should contact Steven Williams, Austin/Tonopah District Ranger, at (775) 964-2671 or email at: [email protected] ; or Heather Mobley 775-964-2671 or email at [email protected] For additional Forest and District information, check out the H-T website… http://www.fs.fed.us/htnf/ The Forest … At over 6.3 million acres, the Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest is the largest National Forest in the contiguous United States. The Forest spans the entire state of Nevada, with one million acres of land in the eastern part of California, along the Eastern Sierra Front. The Districts … The Austin/Tonopah Ranger Districts have two offices one in Austin and the other in Tonopah, Nevada. The Districts are managed as one unit under one District Ranger, with employees working out of both offices. The Austin/Tonopah Ranger Districts are responsible for the management of approximately 2.2 million acres of National Forest System Lands.
    [Show full text]
  • F I N a L Mineral Assessment Report
    BLM F I N A L MINERAL ASSESSMENT REPORT Battle Mountain District Office - Nevada J A N U A R Y 2 0 1 2 This page intentionally left blank Bureau of Land Management Mineral Assessment Report SUMMARY The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Battle Mountain District Office (BMDO) is in the process of revising the district’s Resource Management Plan (RMP). As part of the RMP revision process, the BLM is required to prepare a Mineral Assessment Report providing information regarding mineral occurrences and potential within the BMDO Planning Area (planning area). This report provides an intermediate level of detail for mineral assessment as prescribed in BLM Manual 3060 (BLM 1994). Information presented in this report will be summarized and incorporated into an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the proposed RMP and into the final RMP. The geologic history of central and southern Nevada and the planning area is very complex and includes two major cycles of sedimentation (western and eastern facies sources), episodic thrust faulting, mountain building, and associated intrusive and igneous activity. More recent geologic history includes a period of crustal extension that was accompanied by bimodal (rhyolite-basalt) volcanism, large volume caldera volcanism, and basin and range block-faulting resulting in high-levels of shallow crustal heat flow. The regional and local geologic setting has been instrumental in the location of and potential for numerous economic metallic mineral deposits in the planning area, as well as development of economic geothermal resources. MINING AND MINERAL ACTIVITY IN NEVADA Mineral exploration, particularly for gold, is an ongoing enterprise in Nevada by both operators of existing mines and by other exploration companies.
    [Show full text]
  • Jack Stewart Publications
    NBMG publications by John H. Stewart Bulletin 65: Precambrian and Lower Cambrian rocks, by J.H. Stewart; in Mineral and water resources of Nevada: Cornwall (1964) Bulletin 78: Geology and mineral deposits of Esmeralda County, Nevada: Albers and Stewart (1972) Bulletin 88: Geology and mineral deposits of Lander County, Nevada: Stewart, McKee, and Stager (1977) Map 50: Geologic map of north-central Nevada: Stewart and Carlson (1976) 1:250,000 Map 52: Cenozoic rocks of Nevada--four maps and brief description of distribution, lithology, age, and centers of volcanism: Stewart and Carlson (1976), 1:1,000,000 Map 57: Million-scale geologic map of Nevada: Stewart and Carlson (1977) 1:1,000,000 Map 118: Geologic map of the Carson City 30 x 60 minute quadrangle, Nevada: Stewart (1999) 1:100,000 Open-File Report 02-4: Evidence of a hidden hydrothermal system: The North Valley hydrothermal explosion craters, western Nevada, USA, by Stewart and Roddy Special Publication 4: Geology of Nevada: a discussion to accompany the Geologic map of Nevada (USGS): Stewart (1980) Geologic map of Nevada, compiled by John H. Stewart and John E. Carlson, prepared by U.S. Geological Survey in cooperation with Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology (1978) 1:500,000 USGS and other publications by John H. Stewart Many publications done by John Stewart and listed below were published by the U.S. Geological Survey in cooperation with the Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology. You can view the USGS citations with online links at their website. Go to this link and search by author: http://pubs.er.usgs.gov/ Albers, J.P.
    [Show full text]
  • A History of SMOKY VALLEY, NEVADA
    A History of SMOKY VALLEY, NEVADA A History of SMOKY VALLEY, NEVADA Robert D. McCracken Central Nevada Historical Society Tonopah Nevada All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, recording, or information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. A History of Smoky Valley, Nevada by Robert D. McCracken © Copyright 1997 by Robert D. McCracken Library of Congress Catalog Card Number: 97-067669 ISBN: 0-9652908-2-4 Designed by Paul Cirac, White Sage Studios, Virginia City, Nevada Cover design by Erin Kirk New, Watkinsville, Georgia Composition by Jean 0. Charney, Fort Collins, Colorado Printed in the United States of America To the memory of my father, Robert G. McCracken, a true man of the West. Contents Preface Acknowledgments PART ONE The Early History of Central Nevada 1 - Prologue: Origin of a World-Class Gold Mine The Big Bang Stars: The Engines of Creation Star Cookers The Earth's Crust Develops The Mountains Rise Making a Gold Deposit Origin of a World-Class Gold Deposit 2 - Smoky Valley: The First Inhabitants The Terrain The Environment The Clovis First Theory The Search for Remnants Paleolithic Life at Lake Tonopah The Pre-Archaic Period Surviving the Archaic Period The Numic Spread Theory The Western Shoshone The Coming of the White Man Notes 3 - Exploration of Central Nevada The Phantom River A White Man Crosses the Great Basin Ogden's Snake Country Expeditions Walker's Expedition
    [Show full text]
  • Mining Districts of Nevada
    NEVADA BUREAU OF MINES AND GEOLOGY REPORT 47 Second Edition MINING DISTRICTS OF NEVADA Joseph V. Tingley MACKAY SCHOOL OF MINES 1998 UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA RENO CONTENTS Historical background Development of mining districts in Nevada Previous work Organization of report Acknowledgments District descriptions References Appendix A List of Nevada mining district names Appendix B Nevada mining districts listed by county Appendix C Nevada mining districts listed by commodity Figure 1. Record of proceedings of miners’ meeting at Gold Hill, 1859 Figure 2. Mining laws of the Reese River mining district Figure 3. DeGroot’s map of Nevada Territory, 1863 Figure 4. Menardi’s map of Nevada, 1908 Plate 1 Mining districts of Nevada Note: Hyperlinks are denoted by underlined blue text. PREFACE TO THE SECOND EDITION Most of the major changes included in the second edition of Mining Districts of Nevada resulted from mineral assessment work carried out in south central Nevada between 1992 and 1996 (Tingley and others, 1993, 1997). Six new mining districts, Cedar Spring, Gold Range, Jamestown, Pocopah, Rainstorm, and Trappmans, have been added in Nye County and two districts, Joe May Canyon and White Caps, have been added in Clark County. Six Nye County districts, Antelope Springs, Cactus Springs, Clarkdale, Kawich, Wellington, and Wilsons, and three districts in Lincoln County, Don Dale, Groom, and Papoose, have boundary modifications and new material has been added to their descriptions in the text. In the northern part of the state, the boundary of the Argenta district, Lander County, has been modified to reflect the development of a major gold mine; gold has now surpassed barite as the major commodity produced from this district.
    [Show full text]
  • Fo1j711 31 I S E
    ;fo1J711 31I S E fi1 &'('~~t?rmd n1t'eS SOURCES OF DATA FOR EVALUATION OF SELECTED GEOTHERMAL AREAS IN NORTHERN AND CENTRAL NEVADA By F.H. Olmsted, P.A. Glancy, J.R. Harrill, F.E. Rush, and A.S. Van Denburgh U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations 44-73 August 1973 ,. y ' UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Rogers C. B. Morton, Secretary GIDWGICAL SURVEY Vincent E. McKelvey, Director For additional information write to: Franklin H. Olmsted, Hydrologist Water Resources Division U. S. Geological Survey 345 Middlefield Road Menlo Park, California 94025 • Contents Page Introduction-------------------------------------------------------- 1 Black Rock Desert area---------------------------------------------- 5 ~ars on Desert------------------------------------------------------- 10 Brady's Hot Springs area-------------------------------------------- 14 Ruby Va l ley--------------------------------------------------------- 16 Crescent Valley-Whirlwind Valley area------------------------------- 18 Washoe area--------------------------------------------------------- 21 Pueblo Valley-Continental Lake region------------------------------- 25 Mason Valley-------------------------------------------------------­ 27 Grass Valley-------------------------------------------------------- 29 / Dixie-Fairview Valley area-----------------------------------------­ 32 , Buffalo Valley and lower Reese River Valley------------------------- ~ · Northern Big Smoky valley------------------------------------------- 38 Smith Creek Valley-------------------------------------------------­
    [Show full text]
  • Interpreting the Timberline: an Aid to Help Park Naturalists to Acquaint Visitors with the Subalpine-Alpine Ecotone of Western North America
    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers Graduate School 1966 Interpreting the timberline: An aid to help park naturalists to acquaint visitors with the subalpine-alpine ecotone of western North America Stephen Arno The University of Montana Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Arno, Stephen, "Interpreting the timberline: An aid to help park naturalists to acquaint visitors with the subalpine-alpine ecotone of western North America" (1966). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 6617. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/6617 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INTEKFRETING THE TIMBERLINE: An Aid to Help Park Naturalists to Acquaint Visitors with the Subalpine-Alpine Ecotone of Western North America By Stephen F. Arno B. S. in Forest Management, Washington State University, 196$ Presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Forestry UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA 1966 Approved by: Chairman, Board of Examiners bean. Graduate School Date Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. UMI Number: EP37418 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted.
    [Show full text]
  • HUMBOLDT-TOIYABE NATIONAL FOREST 2019 Year in Review
    HUMBOLDT-TOIYABE NATIONAL FOREST 2019 Year In Review United States Forest Department of Service Agriculture USDA is an Equal Opportunity Employer & Provider. Forest Supervisor’s Message MESSAGE he Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest had another successful year in T 2019. As I reflect on the past year’s accomplishments, I cannot help but think of the USDA Forest Service’s mission statement: “To sustain the health, diversity, and productivity of the Nation’s forests and grass- lands to meet the needs of present and future generations.” Every initiative we undertake tiers to this mission and it is the backbone of our Forest’s strategic plan and our daily work. You will see that in the last year we accomplished a number of key initia- tives and projects with the States of Nevada and California, Tribes, local communities, and collaborative groups. Especially significant in 2019, a Shared Stewardship Agreement was signed by the Nevada Governor, Intermountain and Pacific Southwest Regional Foresters, Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Nevada State Director, and Pacific Southwest Region- al U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) Director. Nevada becomes the ninth state in the nation to sign such an agreement, 2019 LEADERSHIP HIGHLIGHTS but it is the only state so far to also include the BLM and USFWS in the agreement. We encouraged this given the ownership boundaries of fed- • Completed 24,069 acres of hazardous fuels treatments helping the Forest become more eral lands in the state. fire-resilient and healthy. While “shared stewardship” or working across jurisdictions and taking an • Hired a Tribal Relations Specialist to continue “all lands” approach is not new for the employees on the Humboldt-Toi- to build stronger relationships and work col- laboratively with local tribes.
    [Show full text]