Monitoring'2020
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
New National and Regional Bryophyte Records, 63
Journal of Bryology ISSN: 0373-6687 (Print) 1743-2820 (Online) Journal homepage: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/yjbr20 New national and regional bryophyte records, 63 L. T. Ellis, O. M. Afonina, I. V. Czernyadjeva, L. A. Konoreva, A. D. Potemkin, V. M. Kotkova, M. Alataş, H. H. Blom, M. Boiko, R. A. Cabral, S. Jimenez, D. Dagnino, C. Turcato, L. Minuto, P. Erzberger, T. Ezer, O. V. Galanina, N. Hodgetts, M. S. Ignatov, A. Ignatova, S. G. Kazanovsky, T. Kiebacher, H. Köckinger, E. O. Korolkova, J. Larraín, A. I. Maksimov, D. Maity, A. Martins, M. Sim-Sim, F. Monteiro, L. Catarino, R. Medina, M. Nobis, A. Nowak, R. Ochyra, I. Parnikoza, V. Ivanets, V. Plášek, M. Philippe, P. Saha, Md. N. Aziz, A. V. Shkurko, S. Ştefănuţ, G. M. Suárez, A. Uygur, K. Erkul, M. Wierzgoń & A. Graulich To cite this article: L. T. Ellis, O. M. Afonina, I. V. Czernyadjeva, L. A. Konoreva, A. D. Potemkin, V. M. Kotkova, M. Alataş, H. H. Blom, M. Boiko, R. A. Cabral, S. Jimenez, D. Dagnino, C. Turcato, L. Minuto, P. Erzberger, T. Ezer, O. V. Galanina, N. Hodgetts, M. S. Ignatov, A. Ignatova, S. G. Kazanovsky, T. Kiebacher, H. Köckinger, E. O. Korolkova, J. Larraín, A. I. Maksimov, D. Maity, A. Martins, M. Sim-Sim, F. Monteiro, L. Catarino, R. Medina, M. Nobis, A. Nowak, R. Ochyra, I. Parnikoza, V. Ivanets, V. Plášek, M. Philippe, P. Saha, Md. N. Aziz, A. V. Shkurko, S. Ştefănuţ, G. M. Suárez, A. Uygur, K. Erkul, M. Wierzgoń & A. Graulich (2020): New national and regional bryophyte records, 63, Journal of Bryology, DOI: 10.1080/03736687.2020.1750930 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/03736687.2020.1750930 Published online: 18 May 2020. -
2013 Alpine Club Antarctic Expedition Report.Pdf
EXPEDITION REPORT 2013 Alpine Club Antarctic Expedition December 28th 2012 – January 31st 2013 The Alpine Club team approaching the north buttress of Alencar Peak. Photo: Phil Wickens Contents SUMMARY ................................................................................1 Summary Itinerary ..............................................................1 Mountains Climbed.............................................................1 INTRODUCTION .........................................................................2 MEMBERS ................................................................................4 SAILING SOUTH ........................................................................5 ACCESSING THE KIEV PENINSULA ..............................................6 ALENCAR PEAK (1592M)...........................................................7 PEAK 1333M (1333M) ..............................................................8 ‘BELGICA DOME’ (2032M) .........................................................9 VALIENTE PEAK (2270M) ........................................................10 PEAK C.1800M (C.1800M) ......................................................11 PEAK 1475M (1475M) ............................................................12 LANCASTER HILL (642M & 616M) ............................................13 RETURN JOURNEY ..................................................................14 SEA ICE .................................................................................15 WEATHER ..............................................................................16 -
New National and Regional Bryophyte Records, 63 L
JOURNAL OF BRYOLOGY https://doi.org/10.1080/03736687.2020.1750930 BRYOLOGICAL NOTES New national and regional bryophyte records, 63 L. T. Ellisa, O. M. Afoninab, I. V. Czernyadjevab, L. A. Konorevab, A. D. Potemkinb, V. M. Kotkovab, M. Alataşc, H. H. Blomd, M. Boikoe, R. A. Cabralf, S. Jimenezf, D. Dagninog, C. Turcatog, L. Minutog, P. Erzbergerh, T. Ezeri,j, O. V. Galaninak,b, N. Hodgettsl, M. S. Ignatovm,n, A. Ignatovan, S. G. Kazanovskyo, T. Kiebacherp, H. Köckingerq, E. O. Korolkovar,s, J. Larraínt, A. I. Maksimovu, D. Maityv, A. Martinsw, M. Sim-Simw, F. Monteirow, L. Catarinow, R. Medina x, M. Nobisy, A. Nowakz, R. Ochyra aa, I. Parnikozaab,ac, V. Ivanetsac, V. Plášekad, M. Philippeae, P. Sahaaf, Md. N. Azizaf, A. V. Shkurkoag, S. Ştefănuţah, G. M. Suárezai,aj, A. Uyguraj, K. Erkulak, M. Wierzgońal and A. Graulicham aDepartment of Life Sciences, The Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, UK; bKomarov Botanical Institute, St Petersburg, Russia; cDepartment of Bioengineering, Munzur University, Tunceli, Turkey; dNorwegian Institute of Bioeconomy Research, Division of Forest and Forest Resources, Bergen, Norway; eDepartment of Botany, Kherson State University, Ukraine; fInstituto de Botánica del Nordeste, Corrientes, Argentina; gDepartment of Earth, Environment and Life Sciences (DISTAV), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy; hBerlin, Germany; iDepartment of Biology, Niğde Ömer Halisdemir University, Niğde, Turkey; jDepartment of Landscape Architecture, Niğde Ömer Halisdemir University, Niğde, Turkey; kInstitute of Earth -
An Observation of a Gentoo Penguin Pygoscelis Papua Feeding an Adélie Penguin P
Polar Biology (2021) 44:217–219 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00300-020-02779-z SHORT NOTE An observation of a gentoo penguin Pygoscelis papua feeding an Adélie penguin P. adeliae chick Fabrice Genevois1 · Christophe Barbraud2 Received: 2 March 2020 / Revised: 23 November 2020 / Accepted: 27 November 2020 / Published online: 3 January 2021 © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH, DE part of Springer Nature 2021 Abstract Interspecifc feeding refers to behavior where an adult of one species feeds the young of another species, with the exclusion of brood parasitism. In birds, most of observed cases concern passerines and this behavior has so far never been described among seabirds. We report on interspecifc feeding provided by an adult gentoo penguin Pygoscelis papua to an Adélie penguin P. adeliae chick on the Antarctic Peninsula. Keywords Interspecifc feeding · Penguin · Antarctic Introduction Methods The ecology and evolution of helping behavior in birds During the Antarctic summer 2019–2020, one of us (FG) continues to engender considerable interest among behav- visited Petermann Island (65° 10′ S–064° 10′ W), a popu- ioral ecologists (Skutch 1961; Koenig and Dickinson 2004), lar tourist destination, situated of the northwest coast of including interspecifc feeding, or the feeding of non-brood Kiev Peninsula in Graham Land, Antarctic Peninsula. parasitic ofspring of another species. The behavior is gener- Petermann Island is located in Penola Strait, in the Wilhelm ally rare and has been of theoretical interest since it appears archipelago, a short distance south of Booth Island and the to provide little evolutionary beneft to the feeding bird (Shy Lemaire Channel. -
Mineral Magnetic Properties of Granodiorite, Metagabbro and Microgabbro of Petermann Island, West Antarctica
CZECH POLAR REPORTS 8 (1): 94-106, 2018 Mineral magnetic properties of granodiorite, metagabbro and microgabbro of Petermann Island, West Antarctica Vitalii Pavlovych Ponomar1, Liubomyr Igorovych Gavryliv2* 1Department of Physics of Mineral Structures and Biomineralogy, Institute of Geochem- istry, Mineralogy and Ore Formation of NAS of Ukraine, 34 Palladina prospect, Kyiv, 03680, Ukraine 2Department of Geochemistry, Mineralogy and Petrography, Institute of Geology, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, 90 Vasylkivska street, Kyiv, 03022, Ukraine Abstract The research focuses on studying the magnetic properties and mineralogy of iron-bearing minerals of granodiorite, metagabbro, and microgabbro of Petermann Island, West Ant- arctica. The predominant iron-bearing minerals of the rocks are ilmenite, magnetite, and iron sulphides. Magnetite in metagabbro and microgabbro is pointed out to be present as two morphological types with different grain size and morphology. The rocks owe their magnetic properties to the presence of different amounts of magnetite with the Curie temperatures of 570–575°C for granodiorite, 555–560°C for metagabbro and 560–565°C for microgabbro. Magnetite in the rocks is stable under heating to 650°C. A slight de- crease in magnetisation at 350–400°C is attributed to the conversion of maghemite or maghemite-like phase into hematite. Variation of the magnetite content within each sample has a strong expression in the saturation magnetisation. The latter increases in sequence: granodiorite (0.8–1.3 Am2/kg), microgabbro (1.8–3 Am2/kg) and metagabbro (3.1–3.5 Am2/kg). The saturation magnetisation of rocks increases with the increasing content of iron. However, the inverse relation is observed for metagabbro and micro- gabbro due to the replacement of titanite for magnetite in the latter. -
Assessment of the Possible Cumulative Environmental Impacts of Commercial Ship-Based Tourism in the Antarctic Peninsula Area
Assessment of the Possible Cumulative Environmental Impacts of Commercial Ship-Based Tourism in the Antarctic Peninsula Area Proceedings of a Workshop Held in La Jolla, California, 7–9 June 2000 Cover photograph: Gentoo penguins at a rookery near the Antarctic Peninsula. Credit: NSF photograph Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this report are those of the partic- ipants, and do not necessarily represent the official views, opinions, or policy of the National Science Foundation. Assessment of the Possible Cumulative Environmental Impacts of Commercial Ship-Based Tourism in the Antarctic Peninsula Area Proceedings of a Workshop Held in La Jolla, California, 7–9 June 2000 Edited by Robert J. Hofman (retired), Marine Mammal Commission Joyce Jatko, Environmental Officer, Office of Polar Programs Contents Executive Summary.............................................................................................. v 1. Introduction................................................................................................ 1 2. Overview of commercial ship-based tour operations in the Peninsula area................................................................................ 2 3. Examples of possible cumulative environmental impacts .............. 5 4. Site variables affecting possible cumulative effects ....................... 7 5. Activity variables possibly affecting cumulative impacts ............ 10 6. Possible impact avoidance/mitigation measures ............................ 10 7. Assessing the