DOCSLIB.ORG

Investigation of Fluid Behavior in Randomly Packed Columns Using Computed Tomography

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Investigation of Fluid Behavior in Randomly Packed Columns Using Computed Tomography Scuola di Ingegneria Dipartimento di Ingegneria Civile e Industriale Master’s Degree in Chemical Engineering Investigation of fluid behavior in randomly packed columns using Computed Tomography Supervisors: Candidate: Prof. Elisabetta Brunazzi Domenico Mangiaracina Prof. Wolfgang Arlt Sebastian Schug, M. Sc. Prof. Roberto Mauri Academic year 2015/2016 i Gran parte del progresso sta nella volontà del progredire. Seneca Il dizionario è l'unico posto dove successo viene prima di sudore. Vince Lombardi ii iii Abstract University of Pisa - Department of Civil and Industrial Engineering Master Thesis in Chemical Engineering Investigation of the fluid behavior in randomly packed columns using Computed Tomography Domenico Mangiaracina The qualitative investigation of the fluid behavior and the quantitative evaluation of widespread fluid dynamic parameters like liquid hold-up, wetted area and mass-transfer area in a randomly packed column are carried out using Computed Tomography CT, a totally non- invasive measuring technique. Despite the huge effort of different researchers, a lack of comprehension about the flow field within the packed bed still prevents the development of completely satisfying models, that are precisely able to predict these fluid dynamic parameters in order to achieve an economically optimized design of the column. In the present work, three commercial random packings (Raflux Ring, RMSR and RSR), belonging to different generations, are scanned in a 0.1 m diameter column in presence of two different systems: water / air and isopropanol /air. The latter is used for the first time in CT investigations despite the common industrial applications of these organic compounds. An algorithm, previously developed by Schug and Arlt. [1], is applied to compute the profile and the integral values of fluid dynamic parameters along the packed bed, highlighting the effect of the liquid load (ranged between 2 m3 / m2 h and 70 m3 / m2 h), the gas load (ranged between 0 Pa0.5 and 2 Pa0.5), the packing type. The main aims of the present work are summarized in two points: firstly, the investigation of the effect of the column’s re-packing and on the variance of the fluid dynamic parameters. The results show an extremely weak effect of the re-packing of the column, with deviation less than 4 % in terms of coefficient of variation for each fluid dynamic parameter. Secondly, these parameters are evaluated with an organic liquid (isopropanol) to assess the combined influence of significantly different physical properties like viscosity and surface tension. A better wettability of the packing and a higher mass-transfer area is recorded. Furthermore, a graphical qualitative evaluation of the liquid flow morphology and a successive classification of the present liquid structures (films and rivulets) are conducted. iv v Contents ABSTRACT ......................................................................................................................................................................... IV LIST OF FIGURES ................................................................................................................................................................ X LIST OF TABLES ........................................................................................................................................................... XVIII SYMBOLS .......................................................................................................................................................................... XX 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 OBJECTIVES AND AIMS ....................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 STRUCTURE OF THE THESIS ............................................................................................................................... 2 2 LITERATURE REVIEW ......................................................................................................................................... 4 2.1 PACKED COLUMNS .............................................................................................................................................. 4 2.1.1 OPERATING PRINCIPLES AND PACKING TYPES .................................................................................... 4 2.1.2 FLUID DYNAMIC PARAMETERS ............................................................................................................. 11 2.1.2.1 Pressure drop estimation ....................................................................................................... 11 2.1.2.2 Liquid hold-up ............................................................................................................................ 14 2.1.2.3 Flow morphology....................................................................................................................... 17 2.1.2.4 Wetted Area ................................................................................................................................. 19 2.1.2.5 Mass-transfer Area .................................................................................................................... 19 2.1.3 MASS-TRANSFER THEORIES AND PACKING HEIGHT DETERMINATION .......................................... 20 2.1.3.1 Mass-transfer theories ............................................................................................................ 20 2.1.3.2 Packing Height determination .............................................................................................. 22 2.1.3.3 Experimental evaluation of wetted and mass-transfer area .................................... 24 2.1.4 LIQUID MALDISTRIBUTION IN RANDOM PACKINGS ........................................................................... 26 2.1.4.1 Effect on HETP ............................................................................................................................ 26 2.1.4.2 Main causes .................................................................................................................................. 27 2.1.4.3 Liquid maldistribution effects .............................................................................................. 28 2.2 COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY ............................................................................................................................... 30 2.2.1 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................................... 30 vi 2.2.2 OPERATION PRINCIPLE .......................................................................................................................... 31 2.2.3 X-RAYS - MATTER INTERACTION .......................................................................................................... 32 2.2.4 HARDWARE: DESCRIPTION OF THE MAIN COMPONENTS .................................................................. 34 2.2.4.1 Source of X-rays ......................................................................................................................... 35 2.2.4.2 Detector ......................................................................................................................................... 36 2.2.4.3 Gantry-System and Computer-System .............................................................................. 36 2.2.5 IMAGES RECONSTRUCTION .................................................................................................................... 37 2.3 PREVIOUS INVESTIGATIONS OF PACKED COLUMNS USING CT ...................................................................... 40 3. MATERIALS AND METHODS ............................................................................................................................. 46 3.1 EXPERIMENTAL SET-UP.................................................................................................................................... 46 3.1.1 EXPERIMENTAL SET-UP DESCRIPTION ................................................................................................ 46 3.1.2 SCANNED PACKING TYPES ..................................................................................................................... 47 3.1.2.1 Raflux Ring ................................................................................................................................... 48 3.1.2.2 RSMR (RVT Metal Saddle Ring) ........................................................................................... 48 3.1.2.3 RSR (Raschig SuperRing) ....................................................................................................... 48 3.1.3 CUSTOM-DESIGNED CT SYSTEM .......................................................................................................... 49 3.2 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURE ........................................................................................................................... 51 3.3 EXPERIMENTAL CAMPAIGN .............................................................................................................................. 52 3.4 IMAGE PROCESSING ........................................................................................................................................... 53 3.4.1 IMAGE PROCESSING WITH IMAGEJ ......................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • HETP Evaluation of Structured and Randomic Packing Distillation Column
    3 HETP Evaluation of Structured and Randomic Packing Distillation Column Marisa Fernandes Mendes Chemical Engineering Department, Technology Institute, Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro Brazil 1. Introduction Packed columns are equipment commonly found in absorption, distillation, stripping, heat exchangers and other operations, like removal of dust, mist and odors and for other purposes. Mass transfer between phases is promoted by their intimate contact through all the extent of the packed bed. The main factors involving the design of packed columns are mechanics and equipment efficiency. Among the mechanical factors one could mention liquid distributors, supports, pressure drop and capacity of the column. The factors related to column efficiency are liquid distribution and redistribution, in order to obtain the maximum area possible for liquid and vapor contact (Caldas and Lacerda, 1988). These columns are useful devices in the mass transfer and are available in various construction materials such as metal, plastic, porcelain, ceramic and so on. They also have good efficiency and capacity, moreover, are usually cheaper than other devices of mass transfer (Eckert, 1975). The main desirable requirements for the packing of distillation columns are: to promote a uniform distribution of gas and liquid, have large surface area (for greater contact between the liquid and vapor phase) and have an open structure, providing a low resistance to the gas flow. Packed columns are manufactured so they are able to gather, leaving small gaps without covering each other. Many types and shapes of packing can satisfactorily meet these requirements (Henley and Seader, 1981). The packing are divided in random – randomly distributed in the interior of the column – and structured – distributed in a regular geometry.
    [Show full text]
  • Structured Packing Performancesexperimental Evaluation of Two Predictive Models
    1788 Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2000, 39, 1788-1796 Structured Packing PerformancesExperimental Evaluation of Two Predictive Models James R. Fair,*,† A. Frank Seibert,† M. Behrens,‡ P. P. Saraber,‡ and Z. Olujic‡ Department of Chemical Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712, and Laboratory for Process Equipment, Delft University of Technology, 2628 CA Delft, The Netherlands A comprehensive total reflux distillation study of sheet metal structured packings was carried out with the cyclohexane/n-heptane test mixture. The experiments covered a wide range of pressures, two corrugation angles, two surface areas, and two surface designs. Experimental results include pressure drop, capacity, and mass-transfer efficiency. The database generated has been used to evaluate generalized performance models developed independently at The University of Texas Separations Research Program (SRP model)) and at Delft University of Technology (Delft model). This paper reports the experimental results and compares them with predictions from the two models. Deviations of predictions from measurements are discussed in terms of likely contacting mechanisms in the packed bed. Introduction consistent data. And, of course, the data had to be made available to the public if studies could be continued by Corrugated structured packings are used widely in others. distillation columns. Early versions were fabricated Recent experiments at the SRP have provided the from metal gauze and had a specific surface area of needed data. To achieve meaningful and consistent 2 3 about 500 m /m . Later versions were fabricated from comparative results, we felt it necessary to use the the more economical sheet metal and had a specific packings of a single manufacturer.
    [Show full text]
  • A Review on Gas-Liquid Mass Transfer Coefficients in Packed-Bed
    chemengineering Review A Review on Gas-Liquid Mass Transfer Coefficients in Packed-Bed Columns Domenico Flagiello * , Arianna Parisi, Amedeo Lancia and Francesco Di Natale The Sustainable Technologies for Pollutants Control Laboratory, Department of Chemical, Materials and Production Engineering, University of Naples Federico II, P.le Tecchio, 80, 80125 Naples, Italy; [email protected] (A.P.); [email protected] (A.L.); [email protected] (F.D.N.) * Correspondence: domenico.fl[email protected]; Tel.: +39-081-7685942; Fax: +39-081-5936936 Abstract: This review provides a thorough analysis of the most famous mass transfer models for random and structured packed-bed columns used in absorption/stripping and distillation processes, providing a detailed description of the equations to calculate the mass transfer parameters, i.e., −2 −1 gas-side coefficient per unit surface ky [kmol·m ·s ], liquid-side coefficient per unit surface kx −2 −1 2 −3 [kmol·m ·s ], interfacial packing area ae [m ·m ], which constitute the ingredients to assess the mass transfer rate of packed-bed columns. The models have been reported in the original form provided by the authors together with the geometric and model fitting parameters published in several papers to allow their adaptation to packings different from those covered in the original papers. Although the work is focused on a collection of carefully described and ready-to-use equations, we have tried to underline the criticalities behind these models, which mostly rely on the assessment of fluid-dynamics parameters such as liquid film thickness, liquid hold-up and interfacial area, or the real liquid paths or any mal-distributions flow.
    [Show full text]
  • Application of Packed Bed Reactor in Industry
    Application Of Packed Bed Reactor In Industry Suggestible and ophiologic Henry copolymerized his depilation witches condenses analogically. benignantlyPeaceful and after shipshape Art canoes Lambert and tiptoenever balletically,lays his epilator! polypetalous Daryle mapand epicritic.his flanches colligate live or In the combustion beds in packed bed of application reactor industry is dispersed solid particles and of reformer tubes of accuracy as reactant concentrations was limited As the design can therefore require provisions for bed of application in packed reactor? Request PDF Packed-Bed Bioreactor and Its Application in Dairy Food and skate Industry Packed-bed bioreactors are tubular types of. Handbook of handling high velocities between these applications of reactor? Part of the envirogen offers numerous fields of cells interact, currently under a comprehensive competitive product could easiely be obtained with a reactor of construction reduces the! Thanks for industrial setting up bioreactors are consistent bubble characteristics apart, which is generally carried out, which is a compact treatment can be kept at. For these types of studies small fixed-bed reactors are typically chosen. Although, the observation method is a savage and lowcost method, nonetheless it is not opportunity to providing complement understanding of union and liquid interaction in the reactor due to the bully within liver bed in different seat near your wall. This higher under each. Uses several authors are presented in high purities is packed bed in reactor of application industry; sbc tests will be validated adequately characterize chaos. In swap process plant, brew is invade to move mater. Sampling valve selection can take some processes. Packed bed new bed three-phase fixed bubble to bubble slurry column CSTR slurry three-phase fluidized-bed ReaCat uses interactive windows to.
    [Show full text]
  • Choosing Trays and Packings for Distillation Tower-Related Problems Can Be Diffi Cult, Time-Consuming, and Expensive to Diagnose and fi X
    Back to Basics Choosing Trays and Packings for Distillation Tower-related problems can be diffi cult, time-consuming, and expensive to diagnose and fi x. Here’s how to avoid diffi culties and improve operating effi ciency. Mark Pilling Sulzer Chemtech USA Bruce S. Holden The Dow Chemical Co. istillation towers are essential to the chemical product purity and the column’s economics. process industries (CPI), so it is imperative that they System characteristics that affect the design and con- Dare properly designed and operated. Tower internals struction of the tower internals, including constraints such are arguably the most important piece of process equipment, as maximum temperatures, fouling tendencies, and ongoing since they cannot easily be accessed after startup. If the chemical reactions, must be carefully evaluated. In addi- tower internals malfunction, the distillation tower will fol- tion, the corrosivity of the process fl uids and their sensitiv- low suit and the entire chemical process will suffer. ity to contamination dictate the selection of materials of This article explains how process simulations of the construction for the internals. distillation tower provide the necessary data for engineers Once the designer understands these considerations as to select proper tower internals. These internals can be trays well as the hydraulic requirements of the separation, the or packings, each of which has a set of characteristics that tower internals can be selected and designed. makes one more appropriate for a particular separation application than the other. Trays vs. packings Tower internals can be trays, random packing, or Understand the process structured packing. Generally speaking, trays are used in Selection of distillation tower internals requires an applications with liquid rates of 30 m3/m2-h and above, understanding of the purpose of the separation, the required and/or those where solids are present or fouling is a con- range of vapor and liquid fl ows, and the physical properties cern.
    [Show full text]
  • Packed Bed Flooding.Pdf
    Previous Page 14-58 EQUIPMENT FOR DISTILLATION, GAS ABSORPTION, PHASE DISPERSION, AND PHASE SEPARATION For structured packing, Kister and Gill [Chem. Eng. Symp. Ser. 128, A109 (1992)] noticed a much steeper rise of pressure drop with flow parameter than that predicted from Fig. 14-55, and presented a mod- ified chart (Fig. 14-56). The GPDC charts in Figs. 14-55 and 14-56 do not contain specific flood curves. Both Strigle and Kister and Gill recommend calculating the flood point from the flood pressure drop, given by the Kister and Gill equation ∆ = 0.7 Pflood 0.12Fp (14-142) Equation (14-142) permits finding the pressure drop curve in Fig. 14-55 or 14-56 at which incipient flooding occurs. For low-capacity random packings, such as the small first-generation > −1 packings and those smaller than 1-in diameter (Fp 60 ft ), calculated flood pressure drops are well in excess of the upper pressure drop curve in Fig. 14-55. For these packings only, the original Eckert flood correlation [Chem. Eng. Prog. 66(3), 39 (1970)] found in pre-1997 edi- tions of this handbook and other major distillation texts is suitable. The packing factor Fp is empirically determined for each packing FIG. 14-54 Efficiency characteristics of packed columns (total-reflux distillation.) type and size. Values of Fp, together with general dimensional data for individual packings, are given for random packings in Table 14-13 (to = −1 Fp packing factor, ft go with Fig. 14-55) and for structured packings in Table 14-14 (to go ν=kinematic viscosity of liquid, cS with Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of Modeling Rotating Packed Beds and Improving Their Parameters: Gas–Liquid Contact
    sustainability Review A Review of Modeling Rotating Packed Beds and Improving Their Parameters: Gas–Liquid Contact Farhad Ghadyanlou 1, Ahmad Azari 1,* and Ali Vatani 2 1 Faculty of Petroleum, Gas and Petrochemical Engineering, Persian Gulf University, Bushehr P.O. Box 75169-13817, Iran; [email protected] 2 School of Chemical Engineering and Institute of LNG, College of Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran P.O. Box 14779-56315, Iran; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] or [email protected]; Tel.: +98-917-323-8639; Fax: +98-773-344-5182 Abstract: The aim of this review is to investigate a kind of process intensification equipment called a rotating packed bed (RPB), which improves transport via centrifugal force in the gas–liquid field, especially by absorption. Different types of RPB, and their advantages and effects on hydrodynamics, mass transfer, and power consumption under available models, are analyzed. Moreover, different approaches to the modeling of RPB are discussed, their mass transfer characteristics and hydrody- namic features are compared, and all models are reviewed. A dimensional analysis showed that suitable dimensionless numbers could make for a more realistic definition of the system, and could be used for prototype scale-up and benchmarking purposes. Additionally, comparisons of the results demonstrated that Re, Gr, Sc, Fr, We, and shape factors are effective. In addition, a study of mass transfer models revealed that the contact zone was the main area of interest in previous studies, and this zone was not evaluated in the same way as packed beds. Moreover, CFD studies revealed that Citation: Ghadyanlou, F.; Azari, A.; the realizable k-" turbulence model and the VOF two-phase model, combined with experimental Vatani, A.
    [Show full text]
  • Glasteel® Column Systems
    Column Systems C1 V3 5/19/98 9:06 AM Page 3 Glasteel ® Column Systems Column Systems C1 V3 5/19/98 9:05 AM Page 1 Column Systems Designed and built to withstand highly corrosive and reactive environments. Pfaudler packed Glasteel columns efficiently handle process operations such Mist Eliminator as: distillation, absorption, stripping and extraction. Glasteel packed columns are built to your complete process specifications and Liquid Feed Pipe designed in accordance with ASME Code. Liquid Distributor Plate Pfaudler supplies the columns as complete systems with all inter- Bed Limiter nals including random Packing Fill Nozzle or structured packing. Random Packing Packing Dump Nozzle Rosette Redistributor Packing Fill Nozzle Packing Dump Nozzle Multi-Arch Support Plate Gas Sparger Vortex Breaker Column Systems C1 V3 5/19/98 9:06 AM Page 4 Glasteel Column • The fire polished surface of With all these features the glass lining provides Pfaudler pioneered the devel- and benefits, you now opment and use of Glasteel anti-stick properties, thus as a material of construction. minimizing fouling factors. have the flexibility to Advanced enameling technol- minimize cost, improve ogy is used to produce glass Glasteel columns are available in: product purity and lining for column shells, bonnets and support rings. • Sizes ranging from 6 inch column performance to 78 inch diameter. Pfaudler Glasteel columns efficiency. combine the inert properties • Single shell or jacketed of glass with the structural design. strength of steel. Glass lining • Wide range of pressure offers many advantages ratings to meet various over other lining materials: process requirements. • Highly resistant to strong • Temperature ratings ranging acids, powerful oxidizers from -20º F to +450º F.
    [Show full text]